Knowledge

Talk:Tourism in Karnataka

Source 📝

448:
picture I still believe it is an over estimate but that it may be close. The shoulders are probably between 23 and 26 feet wide. The Base seems to be about 33 feet wide. After making some rough estimates of the dimensions I'm estimating it is about 200 cubic meters. If it is average density of a typical stone it would be about 2.5 tons per cubic meter. That would be about 500 tons. this estimate has a large margin of error since it is based on rough guesses and incomplete dimensions. This is one of the greatest wonders of the ancient world. Only a few of the Egyptian statues are larger than this. Any information about how far they transported it, what type of rock it is carved out of or more specific dimensions will be welcome. My initial asumption was that it was carved in place but that doesn't seem to be the case acording to some of the text. There are some reference to it being erected and it seems highly unlikely that it would have been standing up naturaly on the top of a hill. There are also reference to the steps being carved out of the rock. This implies that there may be a lot of rock on the hill therefore it could have been close but it still would have been tough to erect. Like the Trilithon stones it may have been moved up hill. Some of this is speculation so if anyone can confirm or refute it please do so. This is one of a dozen or so sites that moved colossal stones 100 to 1,000 tons in the ancient world.
436:
Gomateswara is of particular interest. This statue is as tall as the Colossi of Memnon. It is not as deep or as heavy but it probably still weighs 3-6 hundred tons and must have been extremely difficult to move. This was erected over 1,000 years ago with primitave technology. If you know more about it and can site sources please do so. I have found several sources on the web and in the library. The web sources are:
211: 133: 106: 75: 143: 21: 247: 517:. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly. 354:
If it's going to take the form of a tourist guide, it doesn't belong in wikipedia. I'm not sure how you could restructure this. List of landmarks? Normally this sort of stuff would get broken out. Places to visit go in geography or history or culture, same with other activities and attractions,
447:
They all agree that the statue is 17 meters tall not 13 as was recorded on your article. I corrected it since I had several sources that agreed. I initionaly assumed that the 26 feet estimated width of the sholders is way off based on the proportions shown in the picture after looking at a clearer
504:
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Knowledge. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good
435:
Please don't eliminate this page or move it to the travel page. It has some historical content although I do agree that some of it may belong on the travel page. I would like to see the parts about architecture and ancient sculpure preserved assuming it is acurate. The Statue of Jain Saint
613: 378:
are of this nature. Either point me to a tourism related article which is apt for encyclopedia (so that I can restructure this article to that tone) or delete all the articles in that category.
36: 513:. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the 485:
I am guessing that many items in the external links section are spam due to the names. I am having trouble accessing them, probably because of my ISP. Pls check and prune the list. Thanks.
580: 664: 344:
You mean you dont like the tone of the article (I can edit to remove original research and unsupported claims) or you think tourism article should not be an encyclopedia entry?
387:
Actually, most of them aren't. They all seem to be about places that are tourist destinations in themselves, rather than specialized articles that present tourist guides.
649: 509:. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the 426:
I will restructure it then. I will try to make it a general article which links to particular tourist places. It might take some time though. So please be patient.
659: 225: 471:. It needs to be thoroughly evaluated to make sure that it is not as tainted as that article was. That article has lost much of its content over this. -- 669: 644: 201: 191: 55:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see 674: 654: 467:
This article was heavily edited in 2008 by IP 203.143.176.253, whose pattern of copy-pasting content is well documented by now at
639: 220: 116: 317:, or rewriting it to be more in line with our content policies and style guide. I'd especially recommend that you read up on 313:, so it's not really appropriate to use the same sort of voice or topic. You might want to try submitting that material at 510: 506: 606: 621: 588: 86: 166: 156: 111: 32: 573: 490: 453: 602:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
617: 584: 272: 554: 294:
I added a gallery which makes the article easy to navigate. Dewan S. Ahsan 08:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
92: 52: 74: 514: 486: 472: 449: 417: 413: 396: 392: 364: 360: 334: 330: 280: 542: 442: 302: 279:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
48: 549: 259: 468: 427: 379: 345: 569:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
505:
link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the
409: 388: 356: 326: 325:
policy, which prohibits inserting opinions (your own or others) into articles as fact.
318: 633: 598:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
322: 310: 306: 405: 148: 305:
is an interesting article, but it seems wholly inappropriate for wikipedia, which
625: 592: 559: 494: 475: 457: 430: 421: 400: 382: 375: 368: 348: 338: 439: 314: 210: 138: 541:
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact
132: 105: 267:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
164:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 161: 565:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
271:] The anchor (#Tourism) is no longer available because it was 241: 68: 15: 408:
definitely needs work though, it's pretty atrocious in tone.
443:
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2000/20000326/spectrum/main5.htm
209: 521:
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
526:
http://www.pearlsindiatour.com/badami-cave-temple.html
60: 56: 27: 376:http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Tourism_in_India 160:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 612:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 579:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 665:C-Class Karnataka articles of High-importance 8: 440:http://www.kamat.com/kalranga/jain/monu.htm 545:and ask him to program me with more info. 100: 650:C-Class India articles of Mid-importance 500:Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 102: 72: 548:From your friendly hard working bot.— 7: 154:This article is within the scope of 91:It is of interest to the following 660:High-importance Karnataka articles 14: 245: 141: 131: 104: 73: 19: 298:Appropriate encyclopedia entry? 196:This article has been rated as 670:WikiProject Karnataka articles 1: 645:Mid-importance India articles 507:request page for whitelisting 476:22:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 458:06:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 218:This article is supported by 626:14:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC) 560:18:24, 8 December 2013 (UTC) 431:19:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 422:19:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 401:19:19, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 383:19:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 369:19:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 349:18:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 339:17:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 593:08:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC) 176:Knowledge:WikiProject India 691: 675:WikiProject India articles 655:C-Class Karnataka articles 202:project's importance scale 179:Template:WikiProject India 28:Tourism in North Karnataka 495:12:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 217: 195: 126: 99: 59:; for its talk page, see 532:\bpearlsindiatour\.com\b 374:Most of the articles in 640:C-Class India articles 607:Karnataka topo deu.png 534:on the local blacklist 511:blacklist request page 311:is not a tourist guide 214: 81:This article is rated 221:WikiProject Karnataka 213: 515:request page on meta 323:No original research 53:Tourism in Karnataka 47:. Its contents were 43:with a consensus to 618:Community Tech bot 585:Community Tech bot 543:User:Cyberpower678 463:Copyright concerns 307:is an encyclopedia 215: 87:content assessment 31:was nominated for 574:Malpe Beach 2.jpg 321:, along with the 303:Karnataka tourism 287: 286: 273:deleted by a user 262:in most browsers. 240: 239: 236: 235: 232: 231: 157:WikiProject India 67: 66: 682: 552: 533: 281:Reporting errors 249: 248: 242: 184: 183: 180: 177: 174: 151: 146: 145: 144: 135: 128: 127: 122: 119: 108: 101: 84: 78: 77: 69: 23: 22: 16: 690: 689: 685: 684: 683: 681: 680: 679: 630: 629: 614:nomination page 600: 581:nomination page 567: 558: 550: 531: 502: 483: 469:North Karnataka 465: 300: 292: 283: 265: 264: 263: 246: 226:High-importance 181: 178: 175: 172: 171: 147: 142: 140: 120: 114: 85:on Knowledge's 82: 20: 12: 11: 5: 688: 686: 678: 677: 672: 667: 662: 657: 652: 647: 642: 632: 631: 610: 609: 599: 596: 577: 576: 566: 563: 556: 539: 538: 537: 536: 501: 498: 487:Anna Frodesiak 482: 479: 473:Moonriddengirl 464: 461: 450:Zacherystaylor 373: 352: 351: 299: 296: 291: 288: 285: 284: 278: 277: 276: 260:case-sensitive 254: 253: 252: 250: 238: 237: 234: 233: 230: 229: 216: 206: 205: 198:Mid-importance 194: 188: 187: 185: 182:India articles 153: 152: 136: 124: 123: 121:Mid‑importance 109: 97: 96: 90: 79: 65: 64: 39:was closed on 37:The discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 687: 676: 673: 671: 668: 666: 663: 661: 658: 656: 653: 651: 648: 646: 643: 641: 638: 637: 635: 628: 627: 623: 619: 615: 608: 605: 604: 603: 597: 595: 594: 590: 586: 582: 575: 572: 571: 570: 564: 562: 561: 555: 553: 546: 544: 535: 530:Triggered by 528: 527: 525: 524: 523: 522: 518: 516: 512: 508: 499: 497: 496: 492: 488: 480: 478: 477: 474: 470: 462: 460: 459: 455: 451: 445: 444: 441: 437: 433: 432: 429: 424: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 402: 398: 394: 390: 385: 384: 381: 377: 371: 370: 366: 362: 358: 350: 347: 343: 342: 341: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 309:. Knowledge 308: 304: 297: 295: 289: 282: 274: 270: 269: 268: 261: 257: 251: 244: 243: 227: 224:(assessed as 223: 222: 212: 208: 207: 203: 199: 193: 190: 189: 186: 169: 168: 163: 159: 158: 150: 139: 137: 134: 130: 129: 125: 118: 113: 110: 107: 103: 98: 94: 88: 80: 76: 71: 70: 62: 58: 54: 50: 46: 42: 41:26 March 2009 38: 34: 30: 29: 25: 18: 17: 611: 601: 578: 568: 547: 540: 529: 520: 519: 503: 484: 466: 446: 438: 434: 425: 406:Nelliampathi 404: 386: 372: 353: 301: 293: 266: 258:Anchors are 255: 219: 197: 167:project page 165: 155: 149:India portal 93:WikiProjects 44: 40: 26: 551:cyberbot II 355:and so on. 57:its history 634:Categories 428:Leotolstoy 380:Leotolstoy 346:Leotolstoy 315:Wikitravel 410:Night Gyr 389:Night Gyr 357:Night Gyr 327:Night Gyr 117:Karnataka 481:Linkfarm 33:deletion 319:WP:NPOV 290:Gallery 275:before. 200:on the 83:C-class 557:Online 89:scale. 49:merged 173:India 162:India 112:India 51:into 45:merge 622:talk 589:talk 491:talk 454:talk 414:talk 393:talk 361:talk 331:talk 256:Tip: 61:here 616:. — 583:. — 192:Mid 35:. 636:: 624:) 591:) 493:) 456:) 420:) 418:Oy 399:) 397:Oy 367:) 365:Oy 337:) 335:Oy 228:). 115:: 620:( 587:( 489:( 452:( 416:/ 412:( 395:/ 391:( 363:/ 359:( 333:/ 329:( 204:. 170:. 95:: 63:.

Index

Tourism in North Karnataka
deletion
The discussion
merged
Tourism in Karnataka
its history
here

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
India
Karnataka
WikiProject icon
India portal
WikiProject India
India
project page
Mid
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Karnataka
High-importance
case-sensitive
deleted by a user
Reporting errors
Karnataka tourism
is an encyclopedia
is not a tourist guide
Wikitravel

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.