142:. The same subject matter could possibly be covered in an encyclopedic way: it could talk about economic significance, tourist demographics, and objectively present a summary of the main destinations (supported by relevant information such as visitor numbers). However, this just looks like promotional material from a tourist board and there is almost nothing here that could be salvaged.-
258:
statements would need to be removed. The unencyclopedic sections like "Tourism
Circuits in North Karnataka" and bare lists of places to visit would also have to be replaced by encyclopedic information such as the effects of tourism upon the economy and the environment. In short, it may be easier to
134:. All the notable tourist destinations are covered in their own articles and there is no additional encyclopedic information here at all. There are large, unencyclopedic sections such as "Top 10 Tourist Attractions of North Karnataka", and the whole thing is extremely
413:
is slightly smaller in area than the
American state of Nebraska. Although eastern Nebraska has more exciting nightlife than western Nebraska, I would not support articles for either of those two sections of a defined area.
439:. No clear justification for cretaing this subpage + it anyways needs to be rewritten to comply with wikipedia's sourcing and NPOV policies. Even the official organizations for tourism promotion (
488:
is a substantial article, but not so long as to require the forking off of subarticles, at least not yet. That article has a section on North
Karnataka which will be a suitable merge target.
464:
Karnataka is a big, beautiful state with a lot of tourist attractions. Despite it being not well referenced as it is now, it still appears to have the potential to stand on its own. --
259:
delete it and rewrite it completely as I think it takes the wrong approach to the subject. I'll try to strip out some of the most problematic parts and we can see how it looks.
445:) deal with the whole state rather than this region alone; and encyclopedic content like number of domestic/international tourists per year is also compiled statewide AFAIK.
162:
Thanks for your comments on the article "Tourism in North
Karnataka". I am ready to take your suggestions; I will try to modify the article to meet the standard of wikipedia.
123:
90:
85:
94:
313:
77:
188:
This article is necessary to provide the information related to
Tourism in North Karnataka. I hope you will not suggest this article after modification.
285:
81:
17:
497:
477:
454:
423:
396:
369:
346:
328:
297:
268:
238:
210:
151:
59:
73:
65:
512:
342:
36:
409:, which is probably what this is spun off of. There is no state called "North Karnataka". The Indian state of
511:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
234:
206:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
493:
392:
293:
264:
147:
485:
432:
406:
338:
47:
450:
419:
230:
202:
180:
131:
489:
388:
289:
260:
143:
284:
terms and tagging all the unreferenced material, converting it to list format and moving it to
436:
323:
281:
251:
139:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
471:
446:
415:
167:
As you already know North
Karnataka is known for the historical places associated with
387:.... No need to have them in a separate article such as this. You are duplication.. --
380:
277:
255:
135:
363:
320:
53:
111:
379:
each piece of this to the articles of the districts of North
Kanaranata such as
172:
466:
410:
356:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
168:
176:
384:
440:
443:
505:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
250:: Thanks for your reply, Manjunath. At a bare minimum, all
118:
107:
103:
99:
361:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
515:). No further edits should be made to this page.
286:List of tourist attractions in North Karnataka
225:I hope you will not suggest this article for
8:
314:list of India-related deletion discussions
308:
312:: This debate has been included in the
435:and clean up to remove the excessive
7:
276:: How about stripping out all the
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
130:I am listing this article per
1:
532:
498:13:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
478:04:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
455:00:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
424:15:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
397:00:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
389:Athos, Porthos, and Aramis
370:00:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
347:22:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
329:14:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
298:13:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
269:13:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
239:13:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
231:Manjunath doddamani Topics
211:13:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
203:Manjunath doddamani Topics
152:12:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
74:Tourism in North Karnataka
66:Tourism in North Karnataka
60:23:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
508:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
274:Alternative suggestion
220:last line correction :
486:Tourism in Karnataka
433:Tourism in Karnataka
407:Tourism in Karnataka
229:after modification.
201:Manjunath Doddamani
48:Tourism in Karnataka
181:Vijayanagara Empire
196:Thanks and Regards
44:The result was
372:
337:North Karnataka.
331:
317:
523:
510:
474:
469:
366:
360:
358:
326:
318:
121:
115:
97:
56:
34:
531:
530:
526:
525:
524:
522:
521:
520:
519:
513:deletion review
506:
472:
467:
364:
354:
339:ChildofMidnight
324:
117:
88:
72:
69:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
529:
527:
518:
517:
501:
500:
480:
458:
457:
426:
374:
373:
359:
351:
350:
349:
332:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
242:
241:
222:
221:
216:
214:
213:
198:
197:
192:
190:
189:
185:
184:
164:
163:
159:
158:
128:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
528:
516:
514:
509:
503:
502:
499:
495:
491:
490:Peterkingiron
487:
484:
481:
479:
476:
475:
470:
463:
460:
459:
456:
452:
448:
444:
441:
438:
434:
430:
427:
425:
421:
417:
412:
408:
404:
401:
400:
399:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:Uttar Kannada
378:
371:
368:
367:
357:
353:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
333:
330:
327:
322:
315:
311:
307:
306:
299:
295:
291:
290:Papa November
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
261:Papa November
257:
256:point-of view
253:
252:peacock terms
249:
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
223:
219:
218:
217:
212:
208:
204:
200:
199:
195:
194:
193:
187:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
165:
161:
160:
156:
155:
154:
153:
149:
145:
144:Papa November
141:
137:
133:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
507:
504:
482:
465:
461:
428:
402:
377:Merge/Delete
376:
375:
362:
355:
334:
309:
273:
247:
226:
215:
191:
132:WP:NOTTRAVEL
129:
52:
45:
43:
31:
28:
183:and others.
173:Rastrakutas
473:What's up?
437:peacockery
282:WP:PEACOCK
447:Abecedare
416:Mandsford
411:Karnataka
169:Chalukyas
46:merge to
227:deletion
177:Kadambas
157:Hi Papa,
140:peacocky
124:View log
462:Neutral
385:Dharwar
365:MBisanz
321:the wub
248:Comment
91:protect
86:history
55:MBisanz
468:Docku:
278:WP:POV
136:WP:POV
119:delete
95:delete
483:Merge
431:with
429:Merge
403:Merge
335:Merge
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
494:talk
451:talk
420:talk
393:talk
343:talk
325:"?!"
310:Note
294:talk
265:talk
254:and
235:talk
207:talk
148:talk
138:and
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
405:to
319:--
496:)
453:)
442:,
422:)
395:)
383:,
345:)
316:.
296:)
288:?
280:,
267:)
237:)
209:)
179:,
175:,
171:,
150:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
51:.
492:(
449:(
418:(
391:(
341:(
292:(
263:(
233:(
205:(
146:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.