Knowledge

Talk:Tourism in Karnataka

Source 📝

459:
picture I still believe it is an over estimate but that it may be close. The shoulders are probably between 23 and 26 feet wide. The Base seems to be about 33 feet wide. After making some rough estimates of the dimensions I'm estimating it is about 200 cubic meters. If it is average density of a typical stone it would be about 2.5 tons per cubic meter. That would be about 500 tons. this estimate has a large margin of error since it is based on rough guesses and incomplete dimensions. This is one of the greatest wonders of the ancient world. Only a few of the Egyptian statues are larger than this. Any information about how far they transported it, what type of rock it is carved out of or more specific dimensions will be welcome. My initial asumption was that it was carved in place but that doesn't seem to be the case acording to some of the text. There are some reference to it being erected and it seems highly unlikely that it would have been standing up naturaly on the top of a hill. There are also reference to the steps being carved out of the rock. This implies that there may be a lot of rock on the hill therefore it could have been close but it still would have been tough to erect. Like the Trilithon stones it may have been moved up hill. Some of this is speculation so if anyone can confirm or refute it please do so. This is one of a dozen or so sites that moved colossal stones 100 to 1,000 tons in the ancient world.
447:
Gomateswara is of particular interest. This statue is as tall as the Colossi of Memnon. It is not as deep or as heavy but it probably still weighs 3-6 hundred tons and must have been extremely difficult to move. This was erected over 1,000 years ago with primitave technology. If you know more about it and can site sources please do so. I have found several sources on the web and in the library. The web sources are:
222: 144: 117: 86: 154: 32: 258: 528:. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly. 365:
If it's going to take the form of a tourist guide, it doesn't belong in wikipedia. I'm not sure how you could restructure this. List of landmarks? Normally this sort of stuff would get broken out. Places to visit go in geography or history or culture, same with other activities and attractions,
458:
They all agree that the statue is 17 meters tall not 13 as was recorded on your article. I corrected it since I had several sources that agreed. I initionaly assumed that the 26 feet estimated width of the sholders is way off based on the proportions shown in the picture after looking at a clearer
515:
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Knowledge. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good
446:
Please don't eliminate this page or move it to the travel page. It has some historical content although I do agree that some of it may belong on the travel page. I would like to see the parts about architecture and ancient sculpure preserved assuming it is acurate. The Statue of Jain Saint
624: 389:
are of this nature. Either point me to a tourism related article which is apt for encyclopedia (so that I can restructure this article to that tone) or delete all the articles in that category.
47: 524:. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the 496:
I am guessing that many items in the external links section are spam due to the names. I am having trouble accessing them, probably because of my ISP. Pls check and prune the list. Thanks.
591: 675: 355:
You mean you dont like the tone of the article (I can edit to remove original research and unsupported claims) or you think tourism article should not be an encyclopedia entry?
398:
Actually, most of them aren't. They all seem to be about places that are tourist destinations in themselves, rather than specialized articles that present tourist guides.
660: 520:. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the 437:
I will restructure it then. I will try to make it a general article which links to particular tourist places. It might take some time though. So please be patient.
670: 236: 482:. It needs to be thoroughly evaluated to make sure that it is not as tainted as that article was. That article has lost much of its content over this. -- 680: 655: 212: 202: 66:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see 685: 665: 478:
This article was heavily edited in 2008 by IP 203.143.176.253, whose pattern of copy-pasting content is well documented by now at
650: 231: 127: 328:, or rewriting it to be more in line with our content policies and style guide. I'd especially recommend that you read up on 324:, so it's not really appropriate to use the same sort of voice or topic. You might want to try submitting that material at 521: 517: 617: 632: 599: 97: 177: 167: 122: 43: 584: 501: 464: 613:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
628: 595: 283: 565: 305:
I added a gallery which makes the article easy to navigate. Dewan S. Ahsan 08:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
103: 63: 85: 525: 497: 483: 460: 428: 424: 407: 403: 375: 371: 345: 341: 291: 553: 453: 17: 313: 290:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
59: 560: 270: 479: 438: 390: 356: 580:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
516:
link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the
420: 399: 367: 337: 336:
policy, which prohibits inserting opinions (your own or others) into articles as fact.
329: 644: 609:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
333: 321: 317: 416: 159: 316:
is an interesting article, but it seems wholly inappropriate for wikipedia, which
636: 603: 570: 505: 486: 468: 441: 432: 411: 393: 386: 379: 359: 349: 450: 325: 221: 149: 552:
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact
143: 116: 278:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
175:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 172: 576:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
282:] The anchor (#Tourism) is no longer available because it was 252: 79: 26: 419:
definitely needs work though, it's pretty atrocious in tone.
454:
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2000/20000326/spectrum/main5.htm
220: 532:
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
537:
http://www.pearlsindiatour.com/badami-cave-temple.html
71: 67: 38: 387:http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Tourism_in_India 171:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 623:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 590:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 676:C-Class Karnataka articles of High-importance 8: 451:http://www.kamat.com/kalranga/jain/monu.htm 556:and ask him to program me with more info. 111: 661:C-Class India articles of Mid-importance 511:Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 113: 83: 559:From your friendly hard working bot.— 7: 165:This article is within the scope of 102:It is of interest to the following 671:High-importance Karnataka articles 25: 256: 152: 142: 115: 84: 30: 309:Appropriate encyclopedia entry? 207:This article has been rated as 18:Talk:Tourism in North Karnataka 681:WikiProject Karnataka articles 1: 656:Mid-importance India articles 518:request page for whitelisting 487:22:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 469:06:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 229:This article is supported by 637:14:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC) 571:18:24, 8 December 2013 (UTC) 442:19:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 433:19:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 412:19:19, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 394:19:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 380:19:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 360:18:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 350:17:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 604:08:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC) 187:Knowledge:WikiProject India 702: 686:WikiProject India articles 666:C-Class Karnataka articles 213:project's importance scale 190:Template:WikiProject India 39:Tourism in North Karnataka 506:12:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 228: 206: 137: 110: 70:; for its talk page, see 543:\bpearlsindiatour\.com\b 385:Most of the articles in 651:C-Class India articles 618:Karnataka topo deu.png 545:on the local blacklist 522:blacklist request page 322:is not a tourist guide 225: 92:This article is rated 232:WikiProject Karnataka 224: 526:request page on meta 334:No original research 64:Tourism in Karnataka 58:. Its contents were 54:with a consensus to 629:Community Tech bot 596:Community Tech bot 554:User:Cyberpower678 474:Copyright concerns 318:is an encyclopedia 226: 98:content assessment 42:was nominated for 585:Malpe Beach 2.jpg 332:, along with the 314:Karnataka tourism 298: 297: 284:deleted by a user 273:in most browsers. 251: 250: 247: 246: 243: 242: 168:WikiProject India 78: 77: 16:(Redirected from 693: 563: 544: 292:Reporting errors 260: 259: 253: 195: 194: 191: 188: 185: 162: 157: 156: 155: 146: 139: 138: 133: 130: 119: 112: 95: 89: 88: 80: 34: 33: 27: 21: 701: 700: 696: 695: 694: 692: 691: 690: 641: 640: 625:nomination page 611: 592:nomination page 578: 569: 561: 542: 513: 494: 480:North Karnataka 476: 311: 303: 294: 276: 275: 274: 257: 237:High-importance 192: 189: 186: 183: 182: 158: 153: 151: 131: 125: 96:on Knowledge's 93: 31: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 699: 697: 689: 688: 683: 678: 673: 668: 663: 658: 653: 643: 642: 621: 620: 610: 607: 588: 587: 577: 574: 567: 550: 549: 548: 547: 512: 509: 498:Anna Frodesiak 493: 490: 484:Moonriddengirl 475: 472: 461:Zacherystaylor 384: 363: 362: 310: 307: 302: 299: 296: 295: 289: 288: 287: 271:case-sensitive 265: 264: 263: 261: 249: 248: 245: 244: 241: 240: 227: 217: 216: 209:Mid-importance 205: 199: 198: 196: 193:India articles 164: 163: 147: 135: 134: 132:Mid‑importance 120: 108: 107: 101: 90: 76: 75: 50:was closed on 48:The discussion 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 698: 687: 684: 682: 679: 677: 674: 672: 669: 667: 664: 662: 659: 657: 654: 652: 649: 648: 646: 639: 638: 634: 630: 626: 619: 616: 615: 614: 608: 606: 605: 601: 597: 593: 586: 583: 582: 581: 575: 573: 572: 566: 564: 557: 555: 546: 541:Triggered by 539: 538: 536: 535: 534: 533: 529: 527: 523: 519: 510: 508: 507: 503: 499: 491: 489: 488: 485: 481: 473: 471: 470: 466: 462: 456: 455: 452: 448: 444: 443: 440: 435: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 414: 413: 409: 405: 401: 396: 395: 392: 388: 382: 381: 377: 373: 369: 361: 358: 354: 353: 352: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 320:. Knowledge 319: 315: 308: 306: 300: 293: 285: 281: 280: 279: 272: 268: 262: 255: 254: 238: 235:(assessed as 234: 233: 223: 219: 218: 214: 210: 204: 201: 200: 197: 180: 179: 174: 170: 169: 161: 150: 148: 145: 141: 140: 136: 129: 124: 121: 118: 114: 109: 105: 99: 91: 87: 82: 81: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 52:26 March 2009 49: 45: 41: 40: 36: 29: 28: 19: 622: 612: 589: 579: 558: 551: 540: 531: 530: 514: 495: 477: 457: 449: 445: 436: 417:Nelliampathi 415: 397: 383: 364: 312: 304: 277: 269:Anchors are 266: 230: 208: 178:project page 176: 166: 160:India portal 104:WikiProjects 55: 51: 37: 562:cyberbot II 366:and so on. 68:its history 645:Categories 439:Leotolstoy 391:Leotolstoy 357:Leotolstoy 326:Wikitravel 421:Night Gyr 400:Night Gyr 368:Night Gyr 338:Night Gyr 128:Karnataka 492:Linkfarm 44:deletion 330:WP:NPOV 301:Gallery 286:before. 211:on the 94:C-class 568:Online 100:scale. 60:merged 184:India 173:India 123:India 62:into 56:merge 633:talk 600:talk 502:talk 465:talk 425:talk 404:talk 372:talk 342:talk 267:Tip: 72:here 627:. — 594:. — 203:Mid 46:. 647:: 635:) 602:) 504:) 467:) 431:) 429:Oy 410:) 408:Oy 378:) 376:Oy 348:) 346:Oy 239:). 126:: 631:( 598:( 500:( 463:( 427:/ 423:( 406:/ 402:( 374:/ 370:( 344:/ 340:( 215:. 181:. 106:: 74:. 20:)

Index

Talk:Tourism in North Karnataka
Tourism in North Karnataka
deletion
The discussion
merged
Tourism in Karnataka
its history
here

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
India
Karnataka
WikiProject icon
India portal
WikiProject India
India
project page
Mid
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Karnataka
High-importance
case-sensitive
deleted by a user
Reporting errors
Karnataka tourism
is an encyclopedia
is not a tourist guide

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.