Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Tobacco politics

Source 📝

390: 369: 400: 285: 264: 295: 552: 507: 190: 233: 919:
considering creating a global article by copying parts of this article, but the only thing I could find to salvage into a global article was the lead sentence. Everything else is about the US specifically. If I knew more about this topic I might be able to create a global article, but I don't, so better to free up this title for someone who can.
1022:, but would be a very thin stub. Trying to globalize this article won't work. I just spent 5 minutes looking at sources and thinking about doing it, and I'm strongly in favour of globalizing all articles, but this one, put simply, is a US subject, but that isn't clear from the current title. We could consider turning hatnoting back from 694:
see some reference to the manipulation of data to fit the preconceived "conclusion" that secondhand smoke is harmful, which is the biggest fraud perpetrated on health care consumers since a Los Alamos scientist said that radiation poisoning results in "a pleasant death." How about we try for some real balance in this article?
1318:
I think the introduction, taxation section, lobby section, and history section can be expanded. It looks like citations need to be added for several points, and the grounds of claims and defenses sections have been marked as needing expansion. I also think a section on e-cigarettes should be included
1456:
The article looks very thorough already! Perhaps finding some more recent reviews/sources would provide more up-to-date information about tobacco politics (most recent seems to be 2013). Additionally, some of the information might be re-organized/elaborated upon to make the article flow better (e.g.
693:
As is usual on Knowledge (XXG), important information is being suppressed by interested parties that don't want it to be known. Why does an article on tobacco politics not go into the social engineering addiction of the anti-smoking Nazis and their well-oiled machine? For one thing, I would like to
918:
This article is about the US specifically, it's not a global article that just focuses too much on the US. By being at this title its preventing the creation of a global article. It'd be easier to create a global article then it would be to turn this US article into a global article. I was
564: 796:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! --
928:
About the redirect, I share you're concern and I don't know what to do about it, but preventing the creation of a global article, and destroying the US article, is not the answer. We can always send the redirect to RFD if we can't figure out what to do with it.
1269:
the proposed move. If the scope of this topic is really and appropriately just the USA (which seems unlikely but is possible) then there's no call to move. If not then expand in time. What's the rush? Yes, a merge might work. But this move proposal doesn't.
511: 1131:
produces only 1 hit "governments and the tobacco industry in Denmark, New Zealand and the United Kingdom" and a whole slew of hits where "governments" means US State governments. At this point in this RM anyone arguing a stub
623:
discuss a central aspect of a larger subject: politics. Where as litigation discusses judiciary aspect, while lobby discusses legislative interest. Because of this, the two can be combined to provide a larger more complete
1018:- this isn't a normal globalisation issue. Outside the US there is virtually no such thing as tobacco politics (at least print sources don't seem to produce notable coverage)... yes there is a bit of info on EU appeals 1457:
vary sentence length in "Litigation" or expand upon Sir Richard Doll's study). Some of the terms under "Grounds of claims" have a lot of potential to be further explained, as well (e.g. strict liability). Great work!
153: 1136:
be produced in future is getting near to being obliged to demonstrate it by starting the stub here and now. The bytes in this RM have already been four times what is needed for a basic stub.
1565: 430: 987:
claim that such content is not readily extractable from open sources leads me to believe that this is unlikely to happen soon. Let the title of this article reflect its actual content.
1127:(which is what "politics" means in this context since tobacco companies can't vote they can only lobby) article that covers more than US. Note that searching for usable sources on 1325: 731:
What sources do you have concerning second hand smoke not being harmfull? And i am a little confused about what nazi's and social engineering addiction has to do with anything?
1189:
from even older articles) and has been tagged with {{globalize}} for a year and a half but remains almost exclusively about the U.S. Move the article to the proposed title and
447: 147: 483: 1340: 1491:) is an annuale free e-book written by the . It shows a list of abstracts of free academic papers providing an overview of the Tobacco politics for each country. 1560: 473: 437: 1153:: You lost me there. I'm not arguing another article should be created. I'm saying this topic is limited to the U.S., so there's no need to move the page per 1128: 1360: 79: 1417: 351: 1570: 442: 1545: 576: 527: 341: 44: 85: 1555: 1423: 649:
be done. Until then, the strong dispersion that exist now makes it difficult to articulate to the reader, and difficult to write and coordinate.
1550: 1326:
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1965/09/the-quiet-victory-of-the-cigarette-lobby-how-it-found-the-best-filter-yet-congress/304762/
413: 374: 317: 1518: 1355: 197: 30: 829:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1345: 943:
Moving this article does nothing to prevent future work on the topic on a global scale. But keeping the article at the wrong title for
934: 871: 714: 210: 1540: 1498: 747: 425: 1119:, I think at this point the Crystal Ball aspect of this really needs to be justified by actual edits before assuming that there will 900:. Better to keep a broader title to allow for expansion of the article. It's already tagged as needing globalizing. While the rename 99: 671:
This section has been deleted for not having any real value to the article. However, you can still access a previous revision of it
1341:
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/11/02/500212602/why-tobacco-companies-are-spending-millions-to-boost-a-cigarette-tax
308: 269: 206: 104: 20: 1408: 848: 421:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
74: 1124: 168: 709:
Don't know about your consiracy claims, but yes, this information is worth mentioning here and should be expanded upon in the
244: 1165: 1061: 930: 867: 510:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
135: 1403: 1361:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/big-tobacco-is-still-in-the-business-of-deceiving-americans_us_5a202d96e4b0392a4ebbf5f3
65: 1330: 863: 1418:
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2017/04/23/commentary/japan-commentary/poverty-politics-tobacco-policy/#.WpMUlma-IWo
1391: 1472: 820: 1368: 218: 769:
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at
1350: 1090:
limited to the U.S. but the propensity for anyone to write about it at Knowledge (XXG) in the near future is low.
129: 109: 969:
Not at all, unless you assume there are no political issues with tobacco in other countries worth discussing. --
1522: 657: 1424:
https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-political-mapping-of-chinas-tobacco-industry-and-anti-smoking-campaign/
1298: 948: 889: 830: 250: 1319:(possibly within lobbying). There could also be a cross-national section to look at other countries as well. 125: 1502: 1141: 1034: 718: 699: 1494: 1460: 735: 743: 1487:
The 5th International Conference of the European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (archived on
55: 1356:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/13/tobacco-industry-america-poor-west-virginia-north-carolina
695: 316:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
175: 1190: 627:
The topic can be further expanded to encompass enforcement and conflicts between other interest groups.
70: 213:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 1346:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/big-tobacco-in-2017-full-steam-ahead_us_590a3e36e4b05279d4edc24b
845: 779:
This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
405: 1154: 1049: 646: 232: 1245: 1210: 1201:
suggests above. Alternatively create a new stub or redirect page to allay the fears of those like
1093: 1074: 990: 954: 653: 161: 1381: 1228:
I would not object to that; I would only object to the base title redirecting to a longer form. --
1198: 1161: 1150: 1137: 1057: 1030: 984: 631: 616: 600: 584: 555:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
535: 1186: 389: 368: 1409:
https://www.publicintegrity.org/2016/03/25/19468/how-big-tobacco-lobbies-safeguard-e-cigarettes
893: 1373: 1315:
I will be working on improving this page over the next few weeks. Here are some ideas I have:
1275: 802: 739: 679: 141: 51: 642: 1468: 1438: 1206: 1194: 1027: 1023: 1019: 904:
better reflect the article's current scope, it would also limit that scope in the future. --
859: 785:
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
608: 214: 202: 24: 1048:. Unless I'm missing something, the idea of tobacco politics is limited to the U.S. Thus 782:
There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
983:
I do not. I agree with you in spirit but years of no such content being added along with
842: 300: 1404:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/03/us/politics/e-cigarettes-vaping-cigars-fda-altria.html
1288: 1331:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/13/tobacco-industry-trump-administration-ties
568: 1392:
http://www.publichealthlawcenter.org/topics/tobacco-control/tobacco-control-litigation
294: 284: 263: 1534: 1233: 1157: 1116: 1053: 974: 909: 635: 620: 604: 580: 531: 418: 1271: 798: 770: 763: 675: 1369:
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/settlement/timelines/fullindex.html
641:
These pages can be recreated when Tobacco politics reaches sufficient size: where
638:
are considerably small, therefore a merge can be done without any loss in content.
1464: 1434: 551: 519: 515: 506: 1351:
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/05/low-tar-cigarettes/481116/
1297:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
710: 395: 290: 1335: 417:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 1526: 1506: 1476: 1442: 1279: 1254: 1237: 1219: 1169: 1145: 1102: 1065: 1038: 999: 978: 963: 938: 913: 875: 853: 806: 788:
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
751: 722: 703: 683: 661: 588: 539: 1229: 1202: 970: 905: 313: 1386: 1086:
Sorry, I misread your comment. The idea of tobacco politics is
1517:
The Smoking Lobby website is now for sale. Should we keep it?--
1382:
https://www.gq.com/gallery/blowing-smoke-tobacco-us-politicians
897: 885: 226: 184: 15: 1488: 1374:
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/19/tobacco.decline/
819:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
672: 892:
doesn't make much sense, just as we wouldn't redirect
160: 1287:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
599:
The following pages have been proposed to be merged:
546:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
501:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
1394:(could also be used for grounds of claims/defenses) 312:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1185:. This article has been around for several years ( 1071:The idea might not be limited but this article is. 833:. No further edits should be made to this section. 174: 1301:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1566:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 762:removing POV tag with no active discussion per 8: 947:future expansion goes against the spirit of 1492: 1458: 363: 258: 1336:http://www.who.int/tobacco/en/atlas24.pdf 1125:Governments and tobacco industry lobbying 577:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 528:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 458:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States 1378:DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-165X.2012.tb00732.x 1205:who fear that lack of an article titled 575:Above undated message substituted from 526:Above undated message substituted from 365: 260: 230: 1489:March 29 2021 from semanticscholar.org 1397:DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00555.x 1129:"governments and the tobacco industry" 1561:Low-importance United States articles 864:Tobacco politics in the United States 7: 838:The result of the move request was: 411:This article is within the scope of 326:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics 306:This article is within the scope of 1387:http://www.jstor.org/stable/3331040 249:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1571:WikiProject United States articles 560: 556: 461:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 1513:Smoking Lobby website is for sale 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 1546:Low-importance politics articles 563:. Further details are available 550: 505: 398: 388: 367: 293: 283: 262: 231: 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 711:Anti- smoking movement article 611:. The rationale is as follows: 478:This article has been rated as 346:This article has been rated as 1556:C-Class United States articles 1209:would stymie future input. — 1: 1551:WikiProject Politics articles 1443:20:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC) 1280:01:52, 12 November 2013 (UTC) 1103:03:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 854:22:09, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 713:. Perhaps you should add it? 667:TOBACCO NOT GOOD FOR YOU..... 329:Template:WikiProject Politics 320:and see a list of open tasks. 201:for general discussion about 42:Put new text under old text. 1431:DOI: 10.1136/tc.2006.016956 1255:00:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC) 1238:23:30, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 1220:23:29, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 1170:04:52, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 1146:00:49, 8 November 2013 (UTC) 1083:23:29, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 1066:03:51, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 1039:08:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 1000:00:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC) 979:23:30, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 964:23:29, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 939:13:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 914:17:30, 5 November 2013 (UTC) 876:22:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC) 752:23:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC) 723:17:01, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 704:23:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 684:22:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC) 662:05:09, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 589:11:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 540:11:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 1413:Cross-national perspective 1587: 1507:22:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC) 1477:05:13, 25 March 2018 (UTC) 689:Truncated scope of article 484:project's importance scale 352:project's importance scale 1541:C-Class politics articles 1527:20:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC) 931:Emmette Hernandez Coleman 868:Emmette Hernandez Coleman 807:03:57, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 477: 414:WikiProject United States 383: 345: 278: 257: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1294:Please do not modify it. 890:Foo in the United States 826:Please do not modify it. 419:United States of America 1483:Sources for the article 464:United States articles 239:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 1308:Possible improvements 567:. Student editor(s): 514:. Student editor(s): 243:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 866:– To reflect scope. 406:United States portal 309:WikiProject Politics 205:. Any such comments 105:No original research 432:Articles Requested! 1199:User:In ictu oculi 985:User:In ictu oculi 632:Tobacco litigation 617:Tobacco litigation 601:Tobacco litigation 565:on the course page 518:. Peer reviewers: 512:on the course page 245:content assessment 200: 86:dispute resolution 47: 1509: 1497:comment added by 1479: 1463:comment added by 1257: 1168: 1105: 1084: 1064: 1002: 966: 851: 755: 738:comment added by 498: 497: 494: 493: 490: 489: 362: 361: 358: 357: 332:politics articles 225: 224: 196: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1578: 1296: 1252: 1251: 1243: 1217: 1216: 1207:tobacco politics 1195:Tobacco industry 1160: 1100: 1099: 1091: 1081: 1080: 1072: 1056: 1028:Tobacco industry 1024:Tobacco politics 997: 996: 988: 961: 960: 952: 860:Tobacco politics 849: 828: 754: 732: 609:Tobacco politics 591: 562: 558: 554: 542: 509: 466: 465: 462: 459: 456: 408: 403: 402: 401: 392: 385: 384: 379: 371: 364: 334: 333: 330: 327: 324: 303: 298: 297: 287: 280: 279: 274: 266: 259: 242: 236: 235: 227: 215:Tobacco politics 203:Tobacco politics 192: 191: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 25:Tobacco politics 16: 1586: 1585: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1531: 1530: 1519:129.222.138.185 1515: 1485: 1451: 1310: 1305: 1292: 1247: 1246: 1212: 1211: 1193:the article to 1095: 1094: 1076: 1075: 1052:is applicable. 992: 991: 956: 955: 824: 814: 767: 733: 691: 669: 597: 574: 561:3 December 2021 548: 525: 503: 463: 460: 457: 454: 453: 452: 438:Become a Member 404: 399: 397: 377: 331: 328: 325: 322: 321: 301:Politics portal 299: 292: 272: 240: 189: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1584: 1582: 1574: 1573: 1568: 1563: 1558: 1553: 1548: 1543: 1533: 1532: 1514: 1511: 1484: 1481: 1450: 1447: 1309: 1306: 1304: 1303: 1289:requested move 1283: 1282: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1242:I would, too. 1223: 1222: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1042: 1041: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 949:WP:CRYSTALBALL 923: 922: 921: 920: 857: 836: 835: 821:requested move 815: 813: 812:Requested move 810: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 786: 783: 766: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 726: 725: 690: 687: 668: 665: 654:ChyranandChloe 651: 650: 639: 628: 625: 596: 595:Merge proposal 593: 557:31 August 2021 547: 544: 502: 499: 496: 495: 492: 491: 488: 487: 480:Low-importance 476: 470: 469: 467: 451: 450: 445: 440: 435: 428: 426:Template Usage 422: 410: 409: 393: 381: 380: 378:Low‑importance 372: 360: 359: 356: 355: 348:Low-importance 344: 338: 337: 335: 318:the discussion 305: 304: 288: 276: 275: 273:Low‑importance 267: 255: 254: 248: 237: 223: 222: 219:Reference desk 207:may be removed 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1583: 1572: 1569: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1559: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1544: 1542: 1539: 1538: 1536: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1512: 1510: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1490: 1482: 1480: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1454: 1448: 1446: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1429: 1426: 1425: 1420: 1419: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1405: 1401: 1400:E-cigarettes 1398: 1395: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1384: 1383: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1366: 1363: 1362: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1332: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1313: 1307: 1302: 1300: 1295: 1290: 1285: 1284: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1268: 1265: 1264: 1256: 1253: 1250: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1221: 1218: 1215: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1181: 1180: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1151:In ictu oculi 1149: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1138:In ictu oculi 1135: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1117:User:Hot Stop 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1079: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1031:In ictu oculi 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1001: 998: 995: 986: 982: 981: 980: 976: 972: 968: 967: 965: 962: 959: 950: 946: 942: 941: 940: 936: 932: 927: 926: 925: 924: 917: 916: 915: 911: 907: 903: 899: 895: 891: 887: 883: 880: 879: 878: 877: 873: 869: 865: 861: 856: 855: 852: 846: 844: 841: 834: 832: 827: 822: 817: 816: 811: 809: 808: 804: 800: 787: 784: 781: 780: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 772: 765: 761: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 730: 729: 728: 727: 724: 720: 716: 715:132.38.190.22 712: 708: 707: 706: 705: 701: 697: 696:BidingMyTime2 688: 686: 685: 681: 677: 674: 666: 664: 663: 659: 655: 648: 644: 640: 637: 636:Tobacco lobby 633: 629: 626: 622: 621:Tobacco lobby 618: 614: 613: 612: 610: 606: 605:Tobacco lobby 602: 594: 592: 590: 586: 582: 578: 572: 570: 566: 553: 545: 543: 541: 537: 533: 529: 523: 521: 517: 513: 508: 500: 485: 481: 475: 472: 471: 468: 455:United States 449: 446: 444: 441: 439: 436: 434: 433: 429: 427: 424: 423: 420: 416: 415: 407: 396: 394: 391: 387: 386: 382: 376: 375:United States 373: 370: 366: 353: 349: 343: 340: 339: 336: 319: 315: 311: 310: 302: 296: 291: 289: 286: 282: 281: 277: 271: 268: 265: 261: 256: 252: 246: 238: 234: 229: 228: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 199: 195:This page is 194: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1516: 1499:84.223.69.34 1493:— Preceding 1486: 1459:— Preceding 1455: 1452: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1421: 1415: 1412: 1407: 1402: 1399: 1396: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1377: 1372: 1367: 1364: 1359: 1354: 1349: 1344: 1339: 1334: 1329: 1324: 1321: 1317: 1314: 1311: 1293: 1286: 1266: 1248: 1213: 1182: 1133: 1120: 1096: 1087: 1077: 1070: 1045: 1015: 993: 957: 944: 901: 884:Redirecting 881: 858: 839: 837: 825: 818: 795: 771:Template:POV 768: 764:Template:POV 740:MilkStraw532 734:— Preceding 692: 670: 652: 598: 573: 549: 524: 504: 479: 443:Project Talk 431: 412: 347: 307: 251:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1453:Hi Kmm257! 1449:Suggestions 1299:move review 1026:to generic 831:move review 645:suggests a 198:not a forum 148:free images 31:not a forum 1535:Categories 1155:WP:CONCISE 1050:WP:CONCISE 843:Cúchullain 211:refactored 1249:AjaxSmack 1214:AjaxSmack 1097:AjaxSmack 1078:AjaxSmack 1020:like this 994:AjaxSmack 958:AjaxSmack 894:Foo (bar) 569:Ajameson1 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1495:unsigned 1473:contribs 1461:unsigned 1428:Defense 1365:History 1312:Hello, 1203:User:BDD 1191:redirect 1187:compiled 1166:contribs 1158:Hot Stop 1062:contribs 1054:Hot Stop 945:possible 840:No move. 748:contribs 736:unsigned 624:picture. 581:PrimeBOT 532:PrimeBOT 323:Politics 314:politics 270:Politics 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1422:China: 1416:Japan: 1272:Andrewa 1183:Support 1016:Support 799:Khazar2 676:Willbat 647:spinoff 643:WP:SIZE 482:on the 350:on the 241:C-class 217:at the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1465:Eli 17 1445:Kathy 1435:Kmm257 1322:Lobby 1267:Oppose 1046:Oppose 882:Oppose 520:Eli 17 516:Kmm257 448:Alerts 247:scale. 126:Google 1123:be a 902:would 630:Both 615:Both 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1523:talk 1503:talk 1469:talk 1439:talk 1276:talk 1234:talk 1162:talk 1142:talk 1121:ever 1058:talk 1035:talk 975:talk 935:talk 910:talk 872:talk 803:talk 744:talk 719:talk 700:talk 680:talk 673:here 658:talk 634:and 619:and 603:and 585:talk 559:and 536:talk 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1291:. 1230:BDD 1197:as 1134:can 1088:not 971:BDD 906:BDD 898:Foo 896:to 888:to 886:Foo 607:to 579:by 530:by 474:Low 342:Low 209:or 176:TWL 1537:: 1525:) 1505:) 1475:) 1471:• 1441:) 1278:) 1244:— 1236:) 1144:) 1092:— 1073:— 1037:) 989:— 977:) 953:— 937:) 912:) 874:) 862:→ 823:. 805:) 773:: 750:) 746:• 721:) 702:) 682:) 660:) 587:) 571:. 538:) 522:. 156:) 54:; 1521:( 1501:( 1467:( 1437:( 1274:( 1232:( 1164:- 1140:( 1060:- 1033:( 973:( 951:. 933:( 908:( 870:( 850:c 847:/ 801:( 742:( 717:( 698:( 678:( 656:( 583:( 534:( 486:. 354:. 253:: 221:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Tobacco politics
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
not a forum
Tobacco politics
may be removed
refactored
Tobacco politics
Reference desk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.