Knowledge

Talk:Tolkien's prose style/GA1

Source 📝

726: 547: 405: 257: 693: 652: 592: 518: 486: 442: 376: 347: 228: 42: 502:
Most of this implicitly focuses on the Lord of the Rings, which is rightfully the focus, but Tolkien's posthumously published works are a different kettle of fish when it comes to prose style. There are a couple of mentions of The Silmarillion here, but I think they deserve to be grouped in a section
750:
Something that relates to item 4 but doesn't explicitly fall under the GA rubric is the general ordering of topics could use a more deliberate plan. The "Initial hostile reception" along with everything from "Simple but varied" to the end of the article (including Rosebury's reply) mostly concerns
565:
The contrast between earlier and later perspectives is over-emphasized and framed too much as a contest. The emphatic phrasing "systematically rebuts Stimpson's attack" is not impartial. As already mentioned, it should definitely not be the first statement of the lede. It doesn't even necessarily
751:
language itself (syntax/diction). There is another theme on the use of langauge as a tool for characterization, which includes most of "Hobbits as mediators of the heroic" through "Distinctive individuality". Grouping sections accordingly would make the article more digestible.
763:
I do not find the article to presently meet the GA standard, but the potential is there. While the problems are not severe, they are not necessarily trivial to solve. It you prefer, I am content to consider it "on hold" without a particular deadline for now.
578:
it would be better not to define a section by hostility. After describing Stimpson's views, Rosebury's reply should immediately follow rather than being somewhere else entirely. This dovetails with a concern I will detail in item 7.
566:
need to be the first thing in the body just because the criticisms were early chronologically. I would rather inform the reader about what some characteristics of the prose actually are before talking about detractors.
421:
Stating that "The 2014 A Companion to J. R. R. Tolkien in particular marked Tolkien's acceptance in the literary canon" without a secondary source to that effect may not be consistent with
396:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). 244:
I do not note any errors along these lines. Many of the sentences carry multiple clauses, which could be broken into more discrete units of thought, but this is not a requirement for GA.
47: 393: 742:
At a minimum, the issues in 1b. and 4. need to be addressed before reaching GA status. There is substantial high-quality content here, so I look forward to seeing it refined.
237: 282: 80: 680:
The original source of the image does not carry licensing information, but the artist has apparently confirmed to the WMF that it is available under CC BY-SA 4.0
297:
by starting with a neutral description of the topic. Instead it begins with a statement that it has been criticized. (Which I will further address in item 4.)
70: 52: 669: 126: 363:
I particularly appreciate the clear demarcation of primary and secondary sources. This appears to be a common practice in Tolkien-related articles.
286: 278: 122: 270: 107: 706: 99: 274: 557: 205: 75: 451: 414: 156: 17: 661: 309:. Carving off independent clauses into full sentences per the prior suggestion would accomplish most of this expansion. 673: 385: 389: 266: 713:
It's hard to imagine any better way of rising to the challenge of illustrating prose style using a picture.
665: 527: 332: 187: 605: 495: 317:
Guidelines for fiction are followed, relying on secondary sources and avoiding in-universe perspective.
115: 305:
The lede should also be slightly expanded to read as a concise stand-alone version of the article, per
455: 779:
Smashing! I find all concerns fully addressed and have no problem endorsing this as a Good Article.
503:
and expanded if possible. At least one notable review of Children of Hurin dwelt on the prose style.
575: 504: 784: 769: 702: 183: 170: 150: 355:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with 638: 634: 462:
Nothing obviously reads like a book excerpt. Spot checking text with Google yields no hits.
92: 642: 422: 561:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 788: 773: 191: 174: 160: 356: 780: 765: 166: 146: 306: 526:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see 604:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 294: 612:
There is no evidence of conflict in the edit log or talk page.
509:
Silmarillion mentions grouped. Children of Húrin added.
134: 103: 429:
Higgins is a reliable secondary source, reviewing the
238:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 570:Reworded, and (per next item) also regrouped. 8: 583:Section merged (so R follows S) and renamed. 534:Nothing here seems outside the topic area. 433:and stating that it marks such recognition. 30: 198: 61: 33: 182:Many thanks, I'll get to it promptly. 7: 240:; spelling and grammar are correct. 755:Regrouped subsections as indicated. 236:. the prose is clear, concise, and 24: 724: 691: 650: 590: 545: 516: 484: 440: 403: 374: 345: 255: 226: 485: 18:Talk:Tolkien's prose style 394:could reasonably be challenged 1: 670:valid non-free use rationales 293:The lede does not conform to 725: 692: 651: 591: 546: 517: 441: 404: 375: 346: 256: 227: 789:15:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC) 774:20:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC) 192:18:43, 1 January 2022 (UTC) 175:18:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC) 161:18:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC) 805: 357:the layout style guideline 622: 472: 327: 214: 204: 313:Split several sentences. 201: 705:to the topic, and have 301:Reordered and reworded. 265:. it complies with the 477:Broad in its coverage 608:or content dispute. 452:copyright violations 415:no original research 338:no original research 574:Going further, per 494:. it addresses the 392:. All content that 736:Overall assessment 666:copyright statuses 629:, if possible, by 287:list incorporation 761: 760: 707:suitable captions 672:are provided for 450:. it contains no 165:Beginning review 89: 88: 796: 728: 727: 695: 694: 674:non-free content 654: 653: 594: 593: 549: 548: 520: 519: 488: 487: 444: 443: 407: 406: 386:reliable sources 378: 377: 349: 348: 259: 258: 230: 229: 199: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 804: 803: 799: 798: 797: 795: 794: 793: 269:guidelines for 267:Manual of Style 210:Review Comment 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 802: 800: 792: 791: 759: 758: 757: 756: 748: 747: 739: 729: 721: 720: 719: 718: 710: 696: 688: 687: 686: 685: 677: 655: 647: 646: 620: 619: 618: 617: 609: 595: 587: 586: 585: 584: 572: 571: 562: 550: 542: 541: 540: 539: 531: 521: 513: 512: 511: 510: 499: 498:of the topic. 489: 481: 480: 470: 469: 468: 467: 459: 445: 437: 436: 435: 434: 418: 413:. it contains 408: 400: 399: 397: 379: 371: 370: 369: 368: 360: 350: 342: 341: 325: 324: 323: 322: 315: 314: 303: 302: 290: 279:words to watch 260: 252: 251: 250: 249: 241: 231: 223: 222: 212: 211: 208: 203: 197: 196: 195: 194: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 801: 790: 786: 782: 778: 777: 776: 775: 771: 767: 754: 753: 752: 745: 744: 743: 740: 737: 733: 730: 723: 722: 716: 715: 714: 711: 708: 704: 700: 697: 690: 689: 683: 682: 681: 678: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 656: 649: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 625: 621: 615: 614: 613: 610: 607: 603: 599: 596: 589: 588: 582: 581: 580: 577: 569: 568: 567: 563: 560: 559: 554: 551: 544: 543: 537: 536: 535: 532: 529: 528:summary style 525: 522: 515: 514: 508: 507: 506: 505: 500: 497: 493: 490: 483: 482: 478: 475: 471: 465: 464: 463: 460: 457: 453: 449: 446: 439: 438: 432: 428: 427: 426: 424: 419: 416: 412: 409: 402: 401: 398: 395: 391: 387: 383: 380: 373: 372: 366: 365: 364: 361: 358: 354: 351: 344: 343: 339: 335: 334: 330: 326: 320: 319: 318: 312: 311: 310: 308: 300: 299: 298: 296: 291: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 271:lead sections 268: 264: 261: 254: 253: 247: 246: 245: 242: 239: 235: 232: 225: 224: 220: 217: 213: 209: 207: 200: 193: 189: 185: 184:Chiswick Chap 181: 180: 179: 178: 177: 176: 172: 168: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 762: 749: 741: 735: 731: 712: 701:. media are 698: 679: 660:. media are 657: 630: 626: 623: 611: 601: 597: 576:WP:STRUCTURE 573: 564: 556: 552: 533: 523: 501: 496:main aspects 491: 476: 473: 461: 447: 430: 420: 410: 390:cited inline 381: 362: 352: 337: 331: 328: 316: 304: 292: 262: 243: 233: 219:Well-written 218: 215: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 664:with their 627:Illustrated 104:visual edit 746:Addressed. 456:plagiarism 367:Thank you! 333:Verifiable 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 431:Companion 307:MOS:INTRO 206:Attribute 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 781:Sennalen 766:Sennalen 703:relevant 633:such as 606:edit war 423:WP:RS/AC 295:MOS:OPEN 167:Sennalen 157:contribs 147:Sennalen 76:Criteria 558:Neutral 283:fiction 127:history 108:history 94:Article 717:Noted. 684:Noted. 668:, and 662:tagged 635:images 616:Noted. 602:Stable 538:Noted. 466:Noted. 321:Noted. 285:, and 275:layout 248:Noted. 643:audio 641:, or 639:video 631:media 336:with 202:Rate 136:Watch 16:< 785:talk 770:talk 388:are 188:talk 171:talk 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 530:). 454:or 787:) 772:) 738:. 734:. 709:. 699:6b 676:. 658:6a 645:: 637:, 624:6. 600:. 555:. 524:3b 492:3a 479:: 474:3. 458:. 448:2d 425:. 417:. 411:2c 384:. 382:2b 359:. 353:2a 340:: 329:2. 289:. 281:, 277:, 273:, 263:1b 234:1a 221:: 216:1. 190:) 173:) 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 783:( 768:( 732:7 598:5 553:4 186:( 169:( 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:Tolkien's prose style
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Sennalen
talk
contribs
18:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Sennalen
talk
18:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Chiswick Chap
talk
18:43, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Attribute
understandable to an appropriately broad audience
Manual of Style
lead sections
layout

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.