750:"it would have come up by now." Sorry, that holds no logical ground. What you might be saying would mean every word ever spoken in the history of politics from X years ago has been researched to and determined its factual basis. Complete nonsense. Furthermore, EVERY article on Knowledge (XXG) needs to be rewritten. You do understand the idea of Knowledge (XXG), right? Everyone keeps adding information to make a better article. There is no perfection that never needs editing. If you believe your article cannot be improved, you need to re-read the wiki instructions. I'm not claiming to have wordsmithed the sentence to perfection. I'm claiming my version provides the reader additional information. I do not understand your reluctance to add information. It seems you have an agenda here to keep the casual reader from knowing the source by burying it in the footnotes. A few words in the article achieves clarity for the reader. Let me make this perfectly clear - I am not questioning the factual content. I'm attempting to let the reader understand the source. Why is it necessary to NOT let the reader know in the article? While I did not read "according to" in a negative sense, I accepted some might. We should be working together to find the words that convey both his military record and let the reader know the source of it. --
715:
wording that makes the reader understand without digging through the footnotes. Lacking a true independent source, I feel the military service line ought to be shown as coming from Bates. The City of
Berkeley website is controlled by Bates - his bio is his words. The SFC article is quoting him on his service. All the same source with none of them doing any fact checking or original research. That makes it a single source. When someone in the coffee house says they served, I believe them. No different from Bates saying he served. But if I were to relay that information to a third party, I would not claim it as a fact, but rather I would say the guy from the coffee house says he served. "Bates says..." or "In Bates' bio..." or "Bates' uncontested statement..." or whatever might be appropriate and neutral for making sure a reader understand this. --
1146:"Shortly after his successful 2002 campaign for mayor, he admitted to throwing away about one thousand copies of The Daily Californian on the day before the election after the student-run campus newspaper endorsed his opponent, then-Mayor Shirley Dean. He was charged with an infraction and was fined $ 100. During his term, Mayor Bates worked with the City Council to pass a law outlawing the stealing of free newspapers. Additionally, he took the opportunity to speak to Berkeley public school students about the consequences of his actions." Seems it's covered. --
435:
414:
657:]. Please find a third party source. As I read the "rules" the sentence could be struck without a third-party verifiable source. Neither of us intend to do so. Letting people know that the source of the information is the subject is the correct thing to do. You think it belongs hidden in the footnote linked pages, and I believe it belongs in a few simple words. We could rewrite the sentence as a quotation from a recent news clip. I do not like that style. --
534:
378:
284:
185:
257:
294:
845:
an intern or fact checker spend an hour filling out a FOIA request? In any event, you can submit a FOIA request on your own (and fax the
Chronicle the letter if it turns out Bates is lying), or write a letter to the Chronicle and tell them you think Bates is lying. They'll check it if they haven't already. Until then, please respect the number of editors asking you to leave this sentence of the article alone.
123:
95:
1060:, one of the nation's largest newspapers, states Bates was a Captain without dispute or attributing the fact to Bates. The article doesn't say Bates said he served in the army; the article says he did. The Berkeley City Biography is also a credible third party source. It is provided by the City of Berkeley. Bates is not the City of Berkeley. "Bates said" is unnecessarily wordy and causes a
209:
524:
503:
366:
64:
221:
133:
1165:, which according to its article is about "Berkeley, California's attempt to green the city—partly by passing Measure G in Berkeley in 2007." But there's no mention in the "Mayor" section of his involvement in greening the city or Measure G. If it's worthy of a movie, surely it's worthy of inclusion in the article.
686:
As the source would be considered reliable, and there is no evidence of dispute or conflict regarding the veracity of the material, it would be inappropriate to challenge the material within the article as that would put a POV slant on the material. Wording such as "according to Bates" can be read as
682:
from which the information comes would be considered a reliable source as it is a local government source. It wouldn't matter for our purposes who wrote it - Bates or an assistant - as we would assume in the absence of any other evidence that the local government - in this case the City of
Berkeley -
1129:
I'm surprised, given the various accusations that were leveled at him, that there is no mention of them in this article. Is there a reason for this, or has someone removed the fact that he walked off with every copy of a free newspaper that was running an article criticizing him during the election?
835:
I read over this discussion again, and on this reading I find the IP's contention that the
Chronicle has only reported Bates's statement and has done no fact checking of its own to be ludicrous. The Chronicle story presented Bates's military service as a fact, not a claim. The Chronicle knows very
820:
And the language "Bates has said" has been inserted again. I reverted. Bates's service is independently verifiable. What he has claimed and the independent sources agree with each other, so there is no need to present this information like Bates is making an unsupported claim. Hypothetically, if
690:
The phrase "according to" is used on Wiki, but generally where the information is in dispute. As there is no dispute here - the information is out there in the public domain, and has not been challenged - it would be inappropriate to use that phrase in this article to refer to the information on the
844:
requests for information on any veteran. Why would they have left this stone unturned? They are in the business of selling newspapers. The irony of Bates having lied about his Army commission, in the middle of the flap with the Marine Corps, would make a great story. Why would they not have had
1041:
based on widely accepted interpretation of
Knowledge (XXG) rules and the voices of established editors with long edit histories. Failure to comply with consensus and wikipedia rules might lead to this page becoming semi-protected, preventing non-experienced users and those without registered user
1004:
Without getting personal, it does seem to be the way pages you edit are handled. I am completely befuddled by your insistence to deny the attribution of one uncontested fact to the reader. I do not care the words if you feel the way I've edited show bias. I do not think they do, but find the words
786:
story is sufficient proof that Bates served in the Army as a
Captain. There is no need to qualify the article's statement about his army service. Obviously, as a graduate of UC Berkeley, he would have been much more likely to have had a commission in the reserve instead of the regular army, so I
767:
Every article that meets the
Featured Article status would have to be written. Bill Clinton's article, Hilary Clinton's article, highly regarded articles with high editor traffic (like there would be 3 editors weighing in on our dispute in a few minutes) would be have to be rewritten. We need an
1019:
The referenced material is the same ultimate source. The reader deserves to know this without going on a fact finding mission. If you think the phrasing is bias, find better words! Just deleting the words is unproductive, and it shows your own bias in the matter. I've been open to finding simple,
714:
The source is the same - Bates himself. I am not questioning whether he is being truthful or not. I'm just attributing the source for the reader. We can keep iterating on the words until we are both happy, but simply removing anyone else's edits is being a bit childish. Let's find the appropriate
654:
The official
Knowledge (XXG) policy is to clarify to the reader the information. When the subject is the sole source of information, the read is entitled to know that. It does not change the information, but it does provide clarity. No accusation is laid that the information is false. I'm merely
1099:
above, in which I basically argued that the
Chronicle is a responsible newspaper and that we assume that responsible newspapers do their jobs unless we have specific evidence contradicting them. Likewise for the City of Berkeley--governments in America are assumed to be responsible sources of
886:
The article as it stands now gives the false impression that Mr. Bates had a change of mind regarding the
Marines. However, he still does not support their continued presence in the city. I can understand issues with style of composition but not erasing factual additions.
949:
I feel your pain. Removing facts seems to the way this article is going. I can only suggest you keep adding them back. Editing and improving articles is the best means for achieving the facts. Even if someone keeps removing them, you can restore them. Good luck.
734:
Bates is a very public figure who has been in politics for a very long time. If he was not telling the truth about his military service, it would have come up by now. If we were to use your line of reasoning, many articles on wikipedia would need to be
1104:
that are available simply don't support your claim that this a solely a self-published statement by Bates. Otherwise, Calbear22 is right--this ends up with some kind of protection to keep you from editing the article at all, which would be unfortunate.
894:"I think it's unwanted," Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates said. "I think it stands (that) we didn't want them here and they came here. And (they are) unwelcome, you know we'd like them to leave voluntarily. So I don't think an apology is in order."1
612:
Some facts are only supported by the subject's own words. No record of his military service is verifiable. Actual dates of deployment are fuzzy. If the only reference is the person's own biography, it needs to be stated as such.
984:
Sorry for the confusion calbear22, however the person who removed the factual posting has whatever reason chosen not to respond to this thread. Hopefully, this is not how all California Democrat politician pages are handled.
805:
I did a Google search, and it appears nobody has found a scintilla of evidence that Mr. Bates did not serve in the Army. You don't need "Bates said." He served. It is obvious. I have spoken. (Small, furtive grin.) Sincerely,
821:
a politician has been accused of a heinous crime, issues a denial, and then is universally supported in his denial by independent media, we don't report just the denial, we say that everyone agrees that he didn't do it.
911:
During the meeting, Bates said, "The Marines have a right to be in Berkeley, but I don't like it. I think it's bad judgment and I wish they would leave and we can suggest that it would be good for them to move on."2
391:
267:
1203:
199:
1064:
problem. "Bates said" or any other wording that claims Bates is the source of the fact of his military service implies that he might have not served in the military. Without a source, such an implication is
882:
There is no clear indication why a factual quote from Mr. Bates with a referenced source regarding his political stance regarding the US Marine Recruiting station would not provide context to the issue.
1218:
1198:
239:
1069:. Bates claiming his military service, from the sources we have, is in fact erroneous. Not one of our sources states "Bate said" he served in the military. Such an inventive claim qualifies as
485:
194:
105:
1268:
475:
655:
stating that only he is the source of the information. Why would you wish to bury information in the footnote linked pages? Provide the reader the information when possible. Please read
1248:
396:
1273:
1213:
451:
43:
1042:
names from editing this page. IP users make many strong contributions to wikipedia and it would be a shame to have them blocked from editing this page. Please respect the rules.
1208:
590:
1253:
234:
109:
1263:
1283:
580:
442:
419:
1243:
902:
In a brief interview after the council finished voting Wednesday, Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates said there was no reason for the council to apologize for its Jan. 29 vote.
898:
Additionally, another source dated Feb 13, 2008, provides even more context on Mr. Bates position regarding the U.S. Marines Recruiting Station located in Berkeley.
48:
1288:
556:
356:
1223:
1188:
1238:
687:
an implication that the person is lying. Not everyone would read it that way, but some might, and that would be potentially damaging to Bates' reputation.
346:
31:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
1020:
better words. Let's not just trash other people's words because we are in love with our own. Let's find the means to convey the idea without prejudice. --
1278:
636:
450:, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
151:
23:
547:
508:
1258:
322:
1228:
155:
676:
This dispute is about the source of the information regarding Bates' military service. The dispute is between calbear22 and 70.237.206.144.
1233:
1131:
1021:
1006:
951:
751:
716:
658:
620:
150:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
1193:
1166:
307:
262:
1073:
which is also banned as one of the core pillars of Knowledge (XXG). Your last comments directed at me were also not in the spirit of
986:
159:
146:
100:
935:
1100:
information for a free society, etc. To pursue this further, bring in other sources that specifically back you up--right now the
1095:
I missed the discussion jumping down to here. Same topic, why the move? Anyway, I figured there was a chance that you'd missed
967:
As I noted on 71.62.121.8's talk page, I didn't delete that quote and I referred 71.62.121.8 to the user that did to ask him why.
75:
1070:
837:
383:
879:
to the Tom Bates Wiki deleted a properly sourced quote from Mr. Bates and the entry was labeled as 'unconstructive'.
32:
1005:
you approve that inform the reader who the source of the information is from. Then we can end this silliness. --
1025:
1010:
955:
755:
720:
662:
624:
447:
1135:
81:
1170:
1057:
783:
539:
1078:
931:
616:
990:
434:
413:
1038:
939:
811:
555:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
321:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
42:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
1106:
846:
822:
792:
63:
1110:
1086:
1047:
972:
850:
826:
796:
773:
740:
644:
926:
701:
46:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
1074:
39:
299:
1061:
807:
552:
138:
533:
1101:
1147:
1082:
1043:
968:
769:
736:
640:
184:
1182:
694:
680:
226:
283:
256:
920:
208:
122:
94:
529:
373:
317:
312:
289:
216:
128:
908:
Referring to the Marines, Bates said, "They were uninvited and unwelcome."
523:
502:
446:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
365:
158:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1066:
840:. This is a guide, published in the Chronicle, of how to submit
1174:
1150:
1139:
1114:
1090:
1051:
1029:
1014:
994:
976:
959:
943:
854:
841:
830:
815:
800:
777:
759:
744:
724:
704:
666:
648:
628:
691:
City of Berkeley website. Any questions, please get in touch.
683:
would be responsible for ensuring that the facts are correct.
57:
38:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
15:
364:
207:
183:
1204:
Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
311:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1096:
876:
1219:
Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
1199:
C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
921:
Berkeley Mayor To Marines: 'Don't Expect An Apology'
551:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
460:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject University of California
635:This is not the official policy of wikipedia. See
1269:Low-importance University of California articles
836:well how to check on the records of a veteran:
639:. Added source to military service regardless.
1249:Mid-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
1000:Military service sourcing discussion continued
1274:WikiProject University of California articles
1214:C-Class biography (sports and games) articles
637:Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons
463:Template:WikiProject University of California
8:
1161:The article mentions that Bates features in
565:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject College football
1209:Politics and government work group articles
1254:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
497:
408:
251:
89:
1264:C-Class University of California articles
905:"What would we apologize for?" he asked.
1284:Low-importance college football articles
838:How to Check Records Of Military Service
1244:C-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
927:Berkeley: No Apology For Marines Stance
499:
410:
253:
91:
61:
768:outside source to settle this dispute.
331:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject California
195:the politics and government work group
1289:WikiProject College football articles
1125:No mention of his campaign for mayor?
568:Template:WikiProject College football
168:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography
7:
1224:Sports and games work group articles
545:This article is within the scope of
443:WikiProject University of California
440:This article is within the scope of
305:This article is within the scope of
144:This article is within the scope of
1189:Biography articles of living people
80:It is of interest to the following
1239:Low-importance California articles
14:
1279:C-Class college football articles
1163:Power Trip: Theatrically Berkeley
1071:Knowledge (XXG):Original Research
466:University of California articles
392:San Francisco Bay Area task force
890:Here is the the original quote:
532:
522:
501:
433:
412:
376:
292:
282:
255:
219:
131:
121:
93:
62:
21:This article must adhere to the
1259:WikiProject California articles
791:official biography about that.
585:This article has been rated as
480:This article has been rated as
351:This article has been rated as
334:Template:WikiProject California
235:the sports and games work group
1229:WikiProject Biography articles
171:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
1115:12:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
1091:09:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
1052:05:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
1030:00:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
1015:13:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
995:12:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
977:05:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
960:04:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
944:17:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
855:18:05, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
831:13:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
816:19:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
801:14:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
778:00:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
760:23:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
745:07:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
725:05:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
705:16:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
667:14:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
649:06:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
629:04:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
559:and see a list of open tasks.
454:and see a list of open tasks.
389:This article is supported by
384:San Francisco Bay Area portal
325:and see a list of open tasks.
232:This article is supported by
192:This article is supported by
24:biographies of living persons
548:WikiProject College football
156:contribute to the discussion
1234:C-Class California articles
1077:because they do not assume
36:must be removed immediately
1305:
1194:C-Class biography articles
1175:06:08, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
1151:11:19, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
1140:06:33, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
1079:Knowledge (XXG):good faith
591:project's importance scale
486:project's importance scale
357:project's importance scale
1039:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus
584:
571:college football articles
517:
479:
428:
372:
350:
277:
215:
191:
116:
88:
1037:This matter has reached
787:think we can accept his
457:University of California
448:University of California
420:University of California
1058:San Francisco Chronicle
784:San Francisco Chronicle
540:College football portal
106:Politics and Government
914:
896:
369:
308:WikiProject California
268:San Francisco Bay Area
212:
188:
70:This article is rated
1075:Knowledge (XXG):Civil
900:
892:
368:
211:
187:
147:WikiProject Biography
74:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1062:Knowledge (XXG):NPOV
871:Direct Quote Deleted
337:California articles
608:Subjects own words
370:
213:
189:
174:biography articles
76:content assessment
946:
934:comment added by
877:edit by Calbear22
631:
619:comment added by
605:
604:
601:
600:
597:
596:
496:
495:
492:
491:
407:
406:
403:
402:
300:California portal
250:
249:
246:
245:
56:
55:
1296:
1102:reliable sources
929:
703:
697:
614:
573:
572:
569:
566:
563:
562:College football
553:college football
542:
537:
536:
526:
519:
518:
513:
509:College football
505:
498:
468:
467:
464:
461:
458:
437:
430:
429:
424:
416:
409:
386:
381:
380:
379:
339:
338:
335:
332:
329:
302:
297:
296:
295:
286:
279:
278:
273:
270:
259:
252:
229:
224:
223:
222:
176:
175:
172:
169:
166:
152:join the project
141:
139:Biography portal
136:
135:
134:
125:
118:
117:
112:
110:Sports and Games
97:
90:
73:
67:
66:
58:
44:this noticeboard
16:
1304:
1303:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1179:
1178:
1159:
1127:
1002:
873:
732:
712:
695:
692:
674:
610:
570:
567:
564:
561:
560:
538:
531:
511:
465:
462:
459:
456:
455:
422:
382:
377:
375:
336:
333:
330:
327:
326:
298:
293:
291:
271:
265:
225:
220:
218:
173:
170:
167:
164:
163:
137:
132:
130:
103:
71:
12:
11:
5:
1302:
1300:
1292:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1181:
1180:
1158:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1132:69.232.239.205
1126:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1083:User:calbear22
1054:
1044:User:calbear22
1022:70.237.216.165
1007:70.237.216.165
1001:
998:
982:
981:
980:
979:
969:User:calbear22
952:70.237.206.144
872:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
770:User:calbear22
752:70.237.206.144
748:
737:User:calbear22
731:
728:
717:70.237.206.144
711:
708:
673:
670:
659:70.237.206.144
652:
651:
641:User:calbear22
621:70.237.206.144
609:
606:
603:
602:
599:
598:
595:
594:
587:Low-importance
583:
577:
576:
574:
557:the discussion
544:
543:
527:
515:
514:
512:Low‑importance
506:
494:
493:
490:
489:
482:Low-importance
478:
472:
471:
469:
452:the discussion
438:
426:
425:
423:Low‑importance
417:
405:
404:
401:
400:
397:Mid-importance
388:
387:
371:
361:
360:
353:Low-importance
349:
343:
342:
340:
323:the discussion
304:
303:
287:
275:
274:
272:Low‑importance
260:
248:
247:
244:
243:
240:Low-importance
231:
230:
214:
204:
203:
200:Low-importance
190:
180:
179:
177:
143:
142:
126:
114:
113:
98:
86:
85:
79:
68:
54:
53:
49:this help page
33:poorly sourced
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1301:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1186:
1184:
1177:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1167:86.44.199.106
1164:
1156:
1152:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1124:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1103:
1098:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1040:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1017:
1016:
1012:
1008:
999:
997:
996:
992:
988:
978:
974:
970:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
957:
953:
947:
945:
941:
937:
933:
928:
923:
922:
917:
913:
909:
906:
903:
899:
895:
891:
888:
884:
880:
878:
870:
856:
852:
848:
843:
839:
834:
833:
832:
828:
824:
819:
818:
817:
813:
809:
804:
803:
802:
798:
794:
790:
785:
781:
780:
779:
775:
771:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
757:
753:
747:
746:
742:
738:
729:
727:
726:
722:
718:
709:
707:
706:
702:
699:
698:
688:
684:
681:
677:
672:Third opinion
671:
669:
668:
664:
660:
656:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
633:
632:
630:
626:
622:
618:
607:
592:
588:
582:
579:
578:
575:
558:
554:
550:
549:
541:
535:
530:
528:
525:
521:
520:
516:
510:
507:
504:
500:
487:
483:
477:
474:
473:
470:
453:
449:
445:
444:
439:
436:
432:
431:
427:
421:
418:
415:
411:
398:
395:(assessed as
394:
393:
385:
374:
367:
363:
362:
358:
354:
348:
345:
344:
341:
324:
320:
319:
314:
310:
309:
301:
290:
288:
285:
281:
280:
276:
269:
264:
261:
258:
254:
241:
238:(assessed as
237:
236:
228:
227:Sports portal
217:
210:
206:
205:
201:
198:(assessed as
197:
196:
186:
182:
181:
178:
161:
160:documentation
157:
153:
149:
148:
140:
129:
127:
124:
120:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
99:
96:
92:
87:
83:
77:
69:
65:
60:
59:
51:
50:
45:
41:
37:
34:
30:
26:
25:
20:
18:
17:
1162:
1160:
1128:
1018:
1003:
987:71.62.113.98
983:
948:
924:
918:
915:
910:
907:
904:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
874:
788:
749:
733:
713:
693:
689:
685:
679:This source
678:
675:
653:
611:
586:
546:
481:
441:
390:
352:
316:
306:
233:
193:
145:
82:WikiProjects
47:
35:
28:
22:
936:71.62.121.8
930:—Preceding
808:GeorgeLouis
615:—Preceding
1183:Categories
735:rewritten.
328:California
318:California
313:U.S. state
263:California
1157:Measure G
1148:Falcorian
1107:Darkspots
916:Sources:
847:Darkspots
823:Darkspots
793:Darkspots
789:statement
730:Follow up
165:Biography
101:Biography
40:libellous
932:unsigned
710:Response
696:SilkTork
617:unsigned
1097:my edit
589:on the
484:on the
355:on the
72:C-class
78:scale.
1067:libel
1171:talk
1136:talk
1111:talk
1087:talk
1056:The
1048:talk
1026:talk
1011:talk
991:talk
973:talk
956:talk
940:talk
851:talk
842:FOIA
827:talk
812:talk
797:talk
782:The
774:talk
756:talk
741:talk
721:talk
663:talk
645:talk
625:talk
154:and
875:An
581:Low
476:Low
347:Low
315:of
29:BLP
1185::
1173:)
1142:)
1138:)
1113:)
1089:)
1050:)
1028:)
1013:)
993:)
975:)
958:)
950:--
942:)
925:2
919:1
853:)
829:)
814:)
799:)
776:)
758:)
743:)
723:)
665:)
647:)
627:)
399:).
266::
242:).
202:).
108:/
104::
1169:(
1134:(
1130:(
1109:(
1085:(
1081:.
1046:(
1024:(
1009:(
989:(
971:(
954:(
938:(
849:(
825:(
810:(
795:(
772:(
754:(
739:(
719:(
700:*
661:(
643:(
623:(
593:.
488:.
359:.
162:.
84::
52:.
27:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
