Knowledge

Talk:Tannaka–Krein duality

Source 📝

263:
observable algebra is described, together with all its charged sectors (=superselection structure), as the fix point subalgebra of the (operator) field algebra under the action of a group of unitary operators (global gauge group). Multiplets of unobservable fields realise the Tannaka-Krein category, and are associated with the morphisms of the observable algebra. In principle, the observable algebra in the vacuum sector should contain all the informations about the theory. The problem then was: is it possible to reconstruct the gauge group, the unobservable fields and the superselection structure, starting from the observable algebra in the vacuum sector? Here the would-be dual category has the morphisms of the observable algebra as it objects, there is no way to understand them as vector spaces, and the Tannaka Krein duality cannot be used. The DR duality can.
84: 74: 53: 22: 262:
The objects in the Tannaka-Krein category are vector spaces. The objects in the Doplicher Roberts category are abstract, only the categorical structure is relevant. An example of application from mathematical physics (which was the motivation of Doplicher and Roberts). In quantum field theory, the
179:
Thanks Charles(I meant Charles, spaced today), whoever you are:) I started this because I saw it had been on the requested list for two years. My mathematical interest is very much a lay-persons. I figured someone with a far better grasp of mathematics than I could expand based on their own
234:
have the same character table. But one can reconstruct them from their representation category by Tannaka duality. Can someone explain what the additional information contained in the representation category is? Thanks.
140: 175:
I think this statement is incorrect. Tannaka-Krein duality is the natural extension to the non-Abelian case of the Pontryagin duality. I don't know about Grothendieck duality.
232: 281: 130: 276: 106: 97: 58: 33: 21: 240: 255: 39: 83: 168: 251: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89: 197: 73: 52: 236: 259: 244: 184: 181: 270: 163: 102: 79: 194:
One cannot reconstruct a finite group from its character table, e.g.
190:
one cannot reconstruct a finite group from its character table
15: 200: 180:
knowledge, an understanding of the links, or both.--
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 226: 8: 19: 47: 218: 205: 199: 49: 7: 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 282:Low-priority mathematics articles 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 277:Start-Class mathematics articles 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 162:" Its natural extension to the 135:This article has been rated as 1: 185:01:29, 3 September 2005 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 245:22:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 227:{\displaystyle D_{4},Q_{8}} 169:Grothendieck duality theory 298: 260:07:30, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 141:project's priority scale 98:WikiProject Mathematics 228: 28:This article is rated 229: 198: 121:mathematics articles 224: 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 289: 233: 231: 230: 225: 223: 222: 210: 209: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 297: 296: 292: 291: 290: 288: 287: 286: 267: 266: 214: 201: 196: 195: 192: 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 295: 293: 285: 284: 279: 269: 268: 265: 264: 221: 217: 213: 208: 204: 191: 188: 177: 159: 158:Older comments 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 294: 283: 280: 278: 275: 274: 272: 261: 257: 253: 249: 248: 247: 246: 242: 238: 219: 215: 211: 206: 202: 189: 187: 186: 183: 176: 173: 171: 170: 165: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 237:Ringspectrum 193: 178: 174: 167: 166:case is the 161: 137:Low-priority 136: 96: 62:Low‑priority 40:WikiProjects 164:non-Abelian 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 30:Start-class 271:Categories 182:T. Anthony 252:Gherardo 139:on the 36:scale. 256:talk 241:talk 172:. " 131:Low 273:: 258:) 250:-- 243:) 254:( 239:( 220:8 216:Q 212:, 207:4 203:D 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale
non-Abelian
Grothendieck duality theory
T. Anthony
01:29, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Ringspectrum
talk
22:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Gherardo
talk
07:30, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Categories
Start-Class mathematics articles
Low-priority mathematics articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.