Knowledge

Talk:Tarski's World

Source 📝

218: 202: 186: 22: 88: 53: 98: 299:
The book is the manual for the program and they came as a package when I bought it with the disk stuck in the book. The reviews are about the program and the manual. But I think the program seemed more important as the focus for our article Best wishes,
269:
I think the issue might be with the style of referencing being used in which the authors were included in the source. This is obviously not appropriate. I'll tidy them up and delete the notability tag and hope that is OK.
377: 193: 63: 329:
The article was about the program as that was the thing I first saw and I think is the most notable thing but it does come with a book and so now I have mentioned this. Hope is ok now (
407: 285:
That looks better. It's now clear that the references are four book reviews of a book with which this program is associated. Is this significant coverage of the program itself?
382: 372: 412: 402: 119:
on Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
225: 71: 367: 156: 146: 315:
If the book and the computer program are a package, the article needs to say so — I got the impression the article was only about the computer program.
362: 392: 121: 397: 387: 111: 58: 33: 209: 67: 21: 320: 290: 259: 250:
Is this program notable? The references appear to be entirely by the authors of the work in question.
39: 251: 334: 305: 275: 103: 316: 286: 255: 217: 201: 185: 356: 330: 301: 271: 116: 93: 338: 324: 309: 294: 279: 263: 115:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to 87: 52: 254:
guidelines call for evidence from reliable independent sources.
15: 216: 200: 184: 167: 378:Low-importance philosophical literature articles 408:Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles 8: 383:Philosophical literature task force articles 373:Stub-Class philosophical literature articles 413:Contemporary philosophy task force articles 403:Stub-Class Contemporary philosophy articles 164: 47: 19: 49: 125:about philosophy content on Knowledge. 7: 109:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 368:Low-importance Philosophy articles 14: 131:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy 96: 86: 51: 20: 151:This article has been rated as 134:Template:WikiProject Philosophy 363:Stub-Class Philosophy articles 1: 393:Low-importance logic articles 339:21:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 325:07:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 310:23:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 295:21:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 280:20:58, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 264:19:20, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 429: 157:project's importance scale 398:Logic task force articles 388:Stub-Class logic articles 224: 208: 192: 163: 150: 81: 46: 194:Philosophical literature 226:Contemporary philosophy 168:Associated task forces: 221: 205: 189: 112:WikiProject Philosophy 28:This article is rated 220: 204: 188: 252:Knowledge:Notability 137:Philosophy articles 222: 206: 190: 122:general discussion 34:content assessment 243: 242: 239: 238: 235: 234: 231: 230: 104:Philosophy portal 420: 175: 165: 139: 138: 135: 132: 129: 106: 101: 100: 99: 90: 83: 82: 77: 74: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 428: 427: 423: 422: 421: 419: 418: 417: 353: 352: 248: 173: 136: 133: 130: 127: 126: 102: 97: 95: 75: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 426: 424: 416: 415: 410: 405: 400: 395: 390: 385: 380: 375: 370: 365: 355: 354: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 247: 244: 241: 240: 237: 236: 233: 232: 229: 228: 223: 213: 212: 207: 197: 196: 191: 181: 180: 178: 176: 170: 169: 161: 160: 153:Low-importance 149: 143: 142: 140: 108: 107: 91: 79: 78: 76:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 425: 414: 411: 409: 406: 404: 401: 399: 396: 394: 391: 389: 386: 384: 381: 379: 376: 374: 371: 369: 366: 364: 361: 360: 358: 340: 336: 332: 328: 327: 326: 322: 318: 314: 313: 311: 307: 303: 298: 297: 296: 292: 288: 284: 283: 281: 277: 273: 268: 267: 266: 265: 261: 257: 253: 245: 227: 219: 215: 214: 211: 203: 199: 198: 195: 187: 183: 182: 179: 177: 172: 171: 166: 162: 158: 154: 148: 145: 144: 141: 124: 123: 118: 114: 113: 105: 94: 92: 89: 85: 84: 80: 73: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 249: 152: 120: 110: 72:Contemporary 40:WikiProjects 317:Deltahedron 287:Deltahedron 256:Deltahedron 357:Categories 246:Notability 128:Philosophy 117:philosophy 64:Literature 59:Philosophy 30:Stub-class 331:Msrasnw 302:Msrasnw 272:Msrasnw 155:on the 36:scale. 210:Logic 68:Logic 335:talk 321:talk 306:talk 291:talk 276:talk 260:talk 147:Low 359:: 337:) 323:) 312:) 308:) 293:) 282:) 278:) 262:) 174:/ 70:/ 66:/ 62:: 341:) 333:( 319:( 304:( 300:( 289:( 274:( 270:( 258:( 159:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Philosophy
Literature
Logic
Contemporary
WikiProject icon
Philosophy portal
WikiProject Philosophy
philosophy
general discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
Philosophical literature
Taskforce icon
Logic
Taskforce icon
Contemporary philosophy
Knowledge:Notability
Deltahedron
talk
19:20, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Msrasnw
talk
20:58, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Deltahedron
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.