1961:. However, even if technophobia is defined as referring to an automatic process, Nesse and Williams noted in the references I cited above that negative emotional responses like anxiety, phobia, and low mood are not in and of themselves disorders or abnormalities because, while they are unpleasant, so is coughing, sneezing, and vomiting and those physiological mechanisms are not diseases or abnormalities either but instead are adaptive defenses. Nesse and Williams further argued that because evolution selects for reproduction and not health, the absence of adaptive phobias like
475:
451:
287:
269:
675:
385:
367:
21:
185:
615:
164:
565:
701:
395:
297:
133:
2025:. By contrast, the technophobia typology cited in the lede sounds more like marketing language for the computer industry to sell more of its products to consumers who do not want them or feel like they do not need them. While I slightly disagree with the previous commenter about technophobia as a mental health issue, I most certainly agree that the lede is biased. --
195:
946:? Is there a generational difference? If so, or not, why? And is there a blind or irrational aspect necessary to its rise? (Ever heard an eco-zealot criticise modern technology, & in the same breath say terrestrial solar cells are the planet's salvation, without a hint of understanding of the inherent contradiction?)
1094:
criteria, it should be understood that MASS DELETION IS COUNTER PRODUCTIVE. It is very frustrating to find large sections of texted deleted before we figure out the right way to reference it. So thank you for your time and productive critisisms, but please understand we are not completely used to this system. ~mrm62
1646:
I want to thank all editors who have contributed to this article, either by editing it or by reviewing it and offering help on this talk page. While the article has fallen short of the Good
Article criteria, it has been obviously significantly improved, moving from stub/start class to solid C or even
1130:
With the exception of very, very few WikiProjects, which do review articles for B class, vast majority of articles are not reviewed for B (or lower) classes in any kind of a formal process. In other words, any editor may at any point review that article and comment on whether it deserves or does not
1067:
This page is in the process of being updated as part of an academic group project. During this time a history section was added, the
Technophobic groups section is being edited, and later the in the arts section will also be edited and expanded. Many of the quality standard issues are in the process
2093:
Self-explanatory here, though should the
Technophobia article include the mention of blockchain and NFT technologies? I bring it up due to a huge wave of backlash for these technologies being based on ideas stemming from technophobia (e.g., fear of change, technology take over, etc.). Mainly citing
1093:
07/ 27/08 I understand that some of the material is unferenced and am attempting to remedy them in the Groups
Section, while continuing to expand. It should be noted that members of this assignment are not fully accustomed to wikipedia formating and referencing system. So as we strive to meet these
1367:
Just want to say thanks to those who decided it was best to delete entire paragraphs and blocks of texts without giving us a chance to find more acceptable sources. Like someone said, we are trying to improve this article for a sociology class at our university. It doesn't help when people just
1825:
The introductory two paragraphs seem particularly biased. While there are people who have a psychological fear of technology, the majority of the time the term technophobia is used it's referring to people who take a principled stance against technology, as shown by the rest of the article with
752:. However, a phobia is, as defined by Merriam-Webster, "an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation." While NPOV is very important, I do believe that it reduces the accuracy of the entry to not mention that aspect of the word.
1507:", so works well. Same for the trailing '}}' pair and whitespace before and after a parameter "=", so there's room to make things a bit more legible. Some parameters will react and include whitespace before, and always after text, so the proofing helps sensitize you to those template foibles.
1368:
mass delete things. The first day I was editing, I had to deal with DiscoSpinster deleting things I was writing before I even had a chance to change things. It would be more helpful if you just left things alone, and tell us what we can do to improve it, rather than delete it altogether.
1956:
for organisms to keep track of new objects, it is not clear why technophobia is a failure of such a mechanism to function as it evolved to if it is defined as referring to an explicit, conscious, and reflective disliking of or concern about technology since that would be the consequence of a
816:
Being frustrated by talking to a machine is NOT an example of technophobia nor more than being angry at a waiter than can't get your order right is a fear of the food service. It's just technology that isn't very good. The other examples are not as bad but particularly weak. Adding
1701:
I am Amish and while I know that this is a common misunderstanding of my religion, I am offended by its placement here. We
Mennonites are Christians and are not at all afraid of technology. Can you tell me, would I be sitting here typing at a computer if such a thing were true?
769:
If the reader will consult such a book as italicized(Recent
Economic Changes), by David A. Wells, published in 1889, he will find passages that, except for the dates and absolute amount involved, might have been written by our technophobes (if I may coin a needed word) of today.
1628:(University of Toronto, 2001), which has some quite interesting comments on the causes or inspirations of modern society, which might be of use in explaining the reasons for technophobia. (If not, it might be worth reading in itself, for anybody interested in the subject...)
1683:"In this way, the Old Order Mennonites are technophobic due to community conformities relating to the restricted use of technologies considered to be luxuries." Since i'm far from convinced a religious faith is technophobic, & it's unsourced, I'm removing it.
1778:
Can someone please remove the sentence about Trump and Putin in this text and review this article generally? This is clearly not objective, scientific information and not relevant to the topic of the page. Thank you. 11:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
880:
The humans united against robots looks like a joke. Looking at the "organisation's" site, it sure don't look like a serious anti-techno organisation that this article makes it out to be. Unless anyone has any objections, I'm going to remove it.
1518:
which assigns the same footnote code number, but subscripted a, b, c... etc. The only place that doesn't work well is if you are quoting an excerpt... the quote should then support each place you use that named reference. Hard huh!?? <g:
833:
Can a person who despises technology due to its widely commercialised nature or its associations with consumerism be called a technophobe? Or a person who does not actually fear technology but just deems it to be superfluous?
1505:
will "Frame" the citation, letting you proof it for how exactly it will look in the footnotes. When you are happy with it, delete the XXX's and it vanishes. The HTML processing will tolerate a lot before the final ":
1744:
not only are examples of technophobia in art, but exhibit technophobia as part of the backstory, with the
Galactica purposely having archaic technology in fear of the newer, Cylon prone technology (mentioned
2161:
1119:
07/28/08 I realize as this article stands it does not qualify for GA. But what about B class? I tried finding the information for B class nomination, but it was not readily appearant. Any comments?
713:
1858:
actually probably could be considering that the introduction of technology into society often causes formerly adaptive traits to become maladaptive in the environment with the new technology (e.g.
1829:
748:
My comment has to do with the deletion of the word "irrational" from this entry. Previously the entry included "irrational fear of modern technology," then user Mrwojo removed irrational for
2013:
conducted experimental research showing that phobias of electric outlets and firearms require extended conditioning and go extinct without continued conditioning, and Nesse also noted in
1131:
a B status. What I'd suggest is that if you think that this article deserves a B status, you should contact one of the editors who commented on this page and ask them for such a review.--
1846:
while I am not a psychologist, it is unclear from the content in the article why technophobia should be thought of as a mental health disorder or problem at all for reasons related to
776:
Sorry for my very limited knowledge of
Knowledge (XXG) semantics. I do not edit, but I read this and thought I should post because the origin of terms can be very difficult to trace.
1524:
If any of you need How-to or where do I find help, just ask. I'm rather fond of Piotr... so long as I don't have to spell his name. (Oh, yeah: Belated
Welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! //
32:
2098:
video as an example of technophobia (e.g., his use of "techbros", fear of blockchain taking over, etc.). I would like to hear this community's feedback on this change proposal.
934:
In addition, I'd be very interested in the root causes of technophobia. The
Luddites weren't spontaneously generated. Why did they arise? And disappear? And reappear as
1435:• The one, in fact that second linked, was a page where I was parking cites and cites with quotes in an article overhaul. (Section titles something like Q1, Q2, etc.)
2146:
2009:
have been limited to non-behavioral traits, so it is not clear that there has been any kind of selection for specific phobias of recent technological inventions.
1826:
Luddites and Anabaptist groups. While psychological adversity to technology is a thing, this article should atleast make an explicit distinction between the two.
343:
1995:
As opposed to those adaptive phobias, various technologies (particularly the ones referred to in the lede) did not exist until fairly recently in human history.
251:
1510:
Because I like to use the same citation to verify key phrases in a paragraph, and that gets easy with a named reference like '<XXXref name="glopsaholic": -->
2186:
349:
1156:
Amish/Mennonite "state that they are against"? Isn't it safe to say "Amish/Mennonites oppose"? As written, it suggests untruthfulness on their part, to me.
2181:
991:
Boy, be glad you're on a "closed" page. The revert war over "causes" (& the absence of reliable sources) could have gotten both locked out for breaking
539:
2131:
907:
I find myself thinking coverage of the subject, especially in literature & film, is extremely biased in favor of recent projects. It didn't start with
241:
685:
2171:
725:
529:
758:
so an 'irrational phobia' is 'irrationally illogical', it is an unrequired adjective... ...in the same manner that 'CD Disc' is 'Compact Disc Disc'
2156:
2136:
417:
217:
319:
2176:
2166:
515:
491:
47:
2121:
1737:
1729:
42:
2151:
2126:
1759:
1746:
1581:
Some would argue against that, Ibid. perhaps, but in such a short para or in such close proximity, is a good example, imho, when to invoke
644:
Find reliable sources for the examples in the "Technophobia in arts" section. Remove any trivial mentions that aren't supported by sources.
1275:
to do this. The references that are not used inline are not really useful because they do not show which information they are referencing.
649:
2141:
1752:
I'm kind of a new editor, so I thought I should put the suggestion here, so that a more experience writer can write, cite, and format.
1709:
783:
1833:
1257:
Hi, it's me again. This article did not address the points I raised in the last review, so I will re-iterate some of the points below:
408:
372:
208:
169:
2099:
1958:
1375:
310:
274:
38:
1794:
482:
456:
2063:) is also not an indication of a mental health problem either, and is instead the fault of the people who designed the technology
2017:
that fear of traffic collisions cannot have a prewired connection to fear. At best, technophobia can be thought of as a subset of
1728:
I'm sorry, I can't help but think there should be an entire section on Battlestar Galactica, as an example within an example. The
2072:
2030:
1931:
1901:
1408:
41:
at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
1588:
Note, most cites in wikipedia DO NOT use quotes, but having the information at hand when building the article is very useful...
1282:. The lead section should be a summary of the entire article rather than simply an introduction; right now, it is far too short.
681:
2001:
1978:
1863:
1821:
The term is mostly used to refer to a principled stance, not psychological fear, so the beginning of this article is misleading
144:
1431:, which are along those lines (ignoring any header section and links--did I mention wiki's have no privacy either? <g: -->
1002:
1399:
2056:
2021:, but it is unclear why fear of new objects is maladaptive for any organism let alone humans for reasons related to the
1859:
1733:
1461:
Cites templates should all have a light-background section you can cut and paste, then lay down and fill in the blanks.
1880:). Additionally, considering the well-documented deceptive conduct that technology companies engage in with respect to
2068:
2026:
1927:
1915:
1897:
1439:
1109:
1083:
20:
633:
Find additional, up-to date reliable sources. Most of the current references used in this article are 5-20 years old.
627:
1893:
1892:), it occurs to me that distrust of the technology these companies create is more than justified. Also, disliking
1594:... just rename to the "quote=" to "Xquote=", or as the additional data I included in the third cite "|data=" ...
1941:
802:
I have just completed a "moderate" revision to this article. Does it seem better now? Just asking. Thank you.
1492:{{cite web|author=|title=|accessdate=...}} staggered a bit things are easier to see. Many will lay that out as:
1245:
1175:
2022:
1953:
1763:
1040:
150:
1262:
1201:
787:
2103:
1881:
1713:
1566:, didn't change any text whatever, so just the added cite. (Hmmm, may be worth a feature request change... )
1790:
1782:
1755:
1705:
1371:
1097:
1071:
779:
569:
2006:
1379:
1847:
1249:
1179:
490:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
416:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
318:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
216:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
103:
84:
1336:
Because there has been no response in seven days, this article has failed its Good article nomination.
474:
450:
1786:
1851:
1689:
1634:
1162:
1024:
955:
755:
I'll leave it as it is; since I created the entry, I don't feel right changing another user's edit!
638:
132:
1867:
1811:
1736:, an example, I think, of the real-world fear at the time of the growing spread of automation. The
1423:• If the page is changing a lot, cut out a version and paste it on a user page... see for example:
1347:
1297:
1225:
818:
1989:
1609:
1530:
848:
I'm not convinced that the Amish are technophobic. They just reject it for reasons of religion.
835:
803:
733:
704:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
1806:
Is there much of a difference between Technophobia and Cyberphobia? They seem exactly the same.
2089:
Should the blockchain / Non-Fungible Token (NFT) technologies be mentioned within this article?
1185:
This article does not meet the Good article criteria and has therefore failed. Issues include:
995:. For the record, unsourced info comes out, & websites (let alone blogs & adsites) are
1919:
1666:
1446:
1320:
1269:
1138:
1050:
1011:
Can I offer one bit of advice? When you add something like "85-90% are technophobic", tell me
400:
286:
268:
200:
1279:
1208:
521:
1885:
1877:
1265:. They must include the publisher and access date; this includes footnotes. I suggest using
717:
1582:
992:
674:
1970:
1684:
1629:
1157:
1124:
1105:
1079:
1068:
of being addressed and any mistakes in the article references section will be corrected.
1019:
950:
939:
912:
1889:
1008:
That said, the history's improved (tho somebody still doesn't recall this is a wiki...).
1807:
1338:
1288:
1216:
935:
908:
822:
614:
302:
384:
366:
2115:
2010:
1996:
1966:
1962:
1945:
1872:
1605:
1526:
1472:{{Cite (Template)NAME|arg1=something1|arg2=something2|...|=somethingNN}}</ref: -->
942:)? (Ever heard an eco-zealot criticise modern technology?) Is there a connection to
924:
916:
729:
1924:
Good Reasons for Bad Feelings: Insights from the Frontier of Evolutionary Psychiatry
1420:. Putting stuff back that was in a para is simple with two tabs going in a browser.
949:
That said, this is the best example under your project I've seen. Congratulations.
1985:
1855:
1662:
1392:
1316:
1134:
1046:
974:
943:
890:
573:
1491:' spread just like that... on the next two lines. Ditto the leading <ref : -->
1949:
997:
965:
700:
184:
163:
973:
at all? Oh, well... You're finding the classics, anyhow. Maybe "ST" belongs in
2095:
2060:
1311:
1120:
1101:
1075:
923:
he keep from getting court-martialled for blowing up so many alien computers?
867:
849:
413:
394:
390:
296:
292:
213:
190:
2018:
1182:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
970:
315:
1468:
with the general form (argNN means argument, or parameter, if you prefer):
1286:
Please address these issues and respond here to update me on its progress.
1252:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
927:, IIRC, rightly joked, "How IBM must hate that man!" It seems mutual.) nor
1546:
I've taken the liberty of inserting three cites on behalf of your class:
928:
487:
1741:
1424:
766:
In his book Economics in One Lesson, Henry Hazlitt remarks on page 38:
984:(P.P.S. Don't forget to sign your posts... 20:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC))
1940:
To reiterate a concern of the previous commenter, while psychologist
1600:... it's discarded by the computer, but there for us people to read.
1214:
Once these issues have been resolved, please renominate the article.
978:
2107:
2076:
2034:
1935:
1905:
1837:
1815:
1767:
1717:
1691:
1673:
1636:
1614:
1535:
1383:
1354:
1327:
1304:
1232:
1164:
1145:
1113:
1087:
1057:
1026:
957:
870:
852:
838:
806:
791:
737:
655:
Find some more recent sources and expand the "Prevalence" section.
749:
773:
The book was published by Harper & Brothers on July, 1946.
1464:
Here's one trick to getting them right when section editing...
669:
555:
524:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
520:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
126:
1475:
when hanging the cite, break the beginning HTML "<ref: -->
963:(P.S. It looks like there's a few SF buffs working on this.
1596:
any undefined parameter in template is just the same as an
1452:, but that's a frequent need. See the category link (hint:
1973:
in humans should actually be thought of as being abnormal
1591:
Getting rid of the quote and keeping it too is a snap...
1573:, (Ibid. form, named and used twice, but with quote and
1495:{{cite web |author= |title= |accessdate= ... |quote= }}
1390:
No Big Deal... this is a wiki. Just go back in History (
1310:
A useful tool that eases the use of citation templates:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1570:
1557:
1551:
1428:
1405:
684:
that ended on July 2008. Further details are available
597:
591:
585:
579:
96:
77:
1912:
Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine
2162:
Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
1959:
controlled rather than an automatic cognitive process
1577:) of the first cite transformed to acceptable format.
695:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
486:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
412:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
314:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
212:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
51:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
1882:
user data collection and surveillance of the public
2051:Also, not liking technology designed by engineers
348:This article has not yet received a rating on the
2096:Dan Olson's Line Goes Up - The Problem With NFTs
1511:'. The form is (subsequent uses, not the first)
1490:... with the trailing "}}</ref" and ': -->
1416:)and grab the text as was cut by editing the
8:
1724:Another Example of Technophobia in the arts?
1005:makes pretty clear not everybody gets it...)
1603:Good luck! Hope Piotr is a easy grader! //
1780:
897:with the lead 'graph (no, I won't explain)
622:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
445:
361:
263:
158:
56:
15:
900:with link redirects (no, I won't explain)
726:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
33:Social sciences and society good articles
2187:Knowledge (XXG) articles as assignments
1830:2604:6000:9B03:3100:B9F9:FB64:2826:A0AF
724:Above undated message substituted from
447:
363:
265:
160:
130:
2182:Knowledge (XXG) pages with to-do lists
1894:technology for automation of one's job
1499:It makes the prose far less dense and
1477:" (or I would usually use the form: '
426:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Technology
226:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology
2147:Unknown-importance sociology articles
1663:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
1317:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
1204:to include publisher and access dates
1189:Unreferenced information, including:
1135:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
1047:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
328:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sociology
7:
500:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Robotics
480:This article is within the scope of
406:This article is within the scope of
308:This article is within the scope of
206:This article is within the scope of
1593:remember the XXX in <XXXref: -->
893:, I had a look here. I see issues:
680:This article was the subject of an
149:It is of interest to the following
2132:Low-importance psychology articles
1866:in creating socially isolated and
1624:Just came across Glen Norcliffe's
1560:, which as different as the diff '
1479:<XXXref name="glopsaholic": -->
825:as well as some general clean up.
709:
705:
522:project-independent quality rating
14:
762:Origin of the Term "Technophobes"
2172:Low-importance Robotics articles
712:. Further details are available
699:
673:
613:
563:
473:
449:
393:
383:
365:
295:
285:
267:
193:
183:
162:
131:
19:
2157:WikiProject Technology articles
2137:WikiProject Psychology articles
2002:The Better Angels of Our Nature
1476:" by making it "<XXXref: -->
1261:Format references according to
1200:Format references according to
969:? I'm impressed. No mention of
864:Technophobia in popular culture
534:This article has been rated as
429:Template:WikiProject Technology
246:This article has been rated as
229:Template:WikiProject Psychology
1838:23:13, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
1816:13:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
1503:! The "broken" <XXXref: -->
1195:"Technophobia in Arts" section
871:16:06, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
331:Template:WikiProject Sociology
37:nominee, but did not meet the
1:
2177:WikiProject Robotics articles
2167:Start-Class Robotics articles
2005:that research findings about
1442:examples, albeit mostly only
1192:"Technophobic Groups" section
981:. 20:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC))
839:14:12, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
503:Template:WikiProject Robotics
494:and see a list of open tasks.
420:and see a list of open tasks.
322:and see a list of open tasks.
220:and see a list of open tasks.
2122:Former good article nominees
2057:human factors and ergonomics
1979:selfish genetic consequences
1043:to attract more reviewers.--
911:(which owes a heavy debt to
738:10:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
2152:C-Class Technology articles
2127:C-Class psychology articles
1768:02:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
1692:10:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
1513:<ref name="glopsaholic"
1041:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review
866:section seems longs to me.
120:Former good article nominee
2203:
2142:C-Class sociology articles
2108:00:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
1642:End of assignment: summary
1504:and trailing </ref: -->
1355:04:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
798:Is the Article Better Now?
540:project's importance scale
350:project's importance scale
252:project's importance scale
45:. Editors may also seek a
2077:20:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
1674:18:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
1637:16:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
1615:17:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
1536:08:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
1384:18:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
1328:18:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
1305:16:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
1233:00:34, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
1165:22:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
1146:21:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
1114:21:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
1088:22:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
1058:01:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
1039:You may want to consider
1027:03:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
958:20:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
792:01:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
533:
519:
468:
378:
347:
280:
245:
178:
157:
117:
59:
55:
2035:16:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
2023:fight-or-flight response
1936:13:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
1906:13:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
1718:21:06, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
1569:Second short form cite,
1035:Additional review avenue
1018:Well on your way, IMO.
940:"It's not easy being..."
853:03:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
807:03:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
2067:in the first place. --
1802:Merge with Cyberphobia?
1556:Added quoted dic defs:
829:Need some clarification
2069:CommonKnowledgeCreator
2027:CommonKnowledgeCreator
2007:recent human evolution
1928:CommonKnowledgeCreator
1898:CommonKnowledgeCreator
1896:is also justified. --
1575:hidden supporting data
682:educational assignment
409:WikiProject Technology
209:WikiProject Psychology
139:This article is rated
1848:evolutionary mismatch
1626:The Ride to Modernity
1438:• It's chock full of
1250:Talk:Technophobia/GA2
1180:Talk:Technophobia/GA1
889:At the invitation of
716:. Student editor(s):
311:WikiProject Sociology
143:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
39:good article criteria
1983:such absence causing
1868:sedentary lifestyles
1852:behavioral modernity
1850:and the timeline of
1738:modern remake series
1278:Expand the lead per
1207:Expand the lead per
483:WikiProject Robotics
104:Good article nominee
85:Good article nominee
1550:Quoted named cite:
819:genetic engineering
812:Real World Examples
432:Technology articles
232:psychology articles
1990:accident-proneness
1954:adaptive mechanism
1916:George C. Williams
1860:role of television
1647:B class. Compare:
1440:Citation templates
1001:not reliable (tho
929:the demolished man
804:User:ProfessorPaul
714:on the course page
603:Updated 2018-03-04
334:sociology articles
145:content assessment
60:Article milestones
1920:Randolph M. Nesse
1798:
1785:comment added by
1758:comment added by
1708:comment added by
1411:
1386:
1374:comment added by
1116:
1100:comment added by
1090:
1074:comment added by
979:Gene's dreamworld
782:comment added by
692:
691:
668:
667:
662:
661:
554:
553:
550:
549:
546:
545:
506:Robotics articles
444:
443:
440:
439:
401:Technology portal
360:
359:
356:
355:
262:
261:
258:
257:
201:Psychology portal
125:
124:
113:
112:
2194:
1878:Robert D. Putnam
1770:
1720:
1687:
1671:
1669:
1632:
1612:
1533:
1517:
1489:}}</ref : -->
1473:
1451:
1445:
1415:
1398:
1369:
1353:
1350:
1341:
1325:
1323:
1303:
1300:
1291:
1274:
1268:
1231:
1228:
1219:
1160:
1143:
1141:
1095:
1069:
1055:
1053:
1022:
953:
903:with copyediting
876:Is HUAR serious?
794:
740:
711:
710:15 December 2019
707:
703:
677:
670:
617:
610:
609:
604:
567:
566:
556:
508:
507:
504:
501:
498:
477:
470:
469:
464:
461:
453:
446:
434:
433:
430:
427:
424:
403:
398:
397:
387:
380:
379:
369:
362:
336:
335:
332:
329:
326:
305:
300:
299:
289:
282:
281:
271:
264:
234:
233:
230:
227:
224:
203:
198:
197:
196:
187:
180:
179:
174:
166:
159:
142:
136:
135:
127:
118:Current status:
99:
80:
57:
23:
16:
2202:
2201:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2112:
2111:
2091:
1977:because of the
1854:. If anything,
1823:
1804:
1776:
1774:Trump and Putin
1753:
1730:original series
1726:
1703:
1699:
1685:
1681:
1672:
1667:
1661:
1644:
1630:
1622:
1610:
1598:in-line comment
1544:
1531:
1521:
1512:
1496:
1470:
1449:
1443:
1414:
1397:
1391:
1365:
1348:
1339:
1337:
1326:
1321:
1315:
1298:
1289:
1287:
1272:
1266:
1244:This review is
1240:
1226:
1217:
1215:
1174:This review is
1172:
1158:
1154:
1144:
1139:
1133:
1065:
1056:
1051:
1045:
1037:
1020:
951:
913:Fred Saberhagen
887:
878:
860:
846:
831:
814:
800:
777:
764:
746:
723:
697:
664:
663:
658:
578:
564:
505:
502:
499:
496:
495:
462:
459:
431:
428:
425:
422:
421:
399:
392:
333:
330:
327:
324:
323:
301:
294:
231:
228:
225:
222:
221:
199:
194:
192:
172:
140:
95:
76:
12:
11:
5:
2200:
2198:
2190:
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2159:
2154:
2149:
2144:
2139:
2134:
2129:
2124:
2114:
2113:
2090:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
1993:
1975:due to its the
1822:
1819:
1803:
1800:
1775:
1772:
1760:71.108.129.230
1747:the miniseries
1725:
1722:
1698:
1695:
1680:
1677:
1660:
1643:
1640:
1621:
1618:
1583:(common sense)
1579:
1578:
1567:
1554:
1543:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1501:easier to edit
1498:
1494:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1483:
1474:
1469:
1467:
1465:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1437:
1436:
1434:
1433:
1422:
1421:
1412:
1395:
1364:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1331:
1330:
1314:
1284:
1283:
1276:
1255:
1254:
1239:
1236:
1212:
1211:
1205:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1171:
1168:
1153:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1132:
1064:
1061:
1044:
1036:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1016:
1009:
1006:
986:
985:
982:
905:
904:
901:
898:
886:
885:The stylistics
883:
877:
874:
859:
856:
845:
842:
830:
827:
823:nanotechnology
813:
810:
799:
796:
763:
760:
745:
742:
706:23 August 2019
696:
693:
690:
689:
678:
666:
665:
660:
659:
657:
656:
645:
634:
628:Citing sources
621:
619:
618:
606:
561:
559:
552:
551:
548:
547:
544:
543:
536:Low-importance
532:
526:
525:
518:
512:
511:
509:
492:the discussion
478:
466:
465:
463:Low‑importance
454:
442:
441:
438:
437:
435:
418:the discussion
405:
404:
388:
376:
375:
370:
358:
357:
354:
353:
346:
340:
339:
337:
320:the discussion
307:
306:
303:Society portal
290:
278:
277:
272:
260:
259:
256:
255:
248:Low-importance
244:
238:
237:
235:
218:the discussion
205:
204:
188:
176:
175:
173:Low‑importance
167:
155:
154:
148:
137:
123:
122:
115:
114:
111:
110:
107:
100:
97:August 6, 2008
92:
91:
88:
81:
73:
72:
69:
66:
62:
61:
53:
52:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2199:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2160:
2158:
2155:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2145:
2143:
2140:
2138:
2135:
2133:
2130:
2128:
2125:
2123:
2120:
2119:
2117:
2110:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2088:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2003:
1998:
1997:Steven Pinker
1994:
1991:
1987:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1967:arachnophobia
1964:
1963:ophidiophobia
1960:
1955:
1952:exists as an
1951:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1926:by Nesse. --
1925:
1921:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1874:
1873:Bowling Alone
1869:
1865:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1820:
1818:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1801:
1799:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1773:
1771:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1750:
1748:
1743:
1740:and spin-off
1739:
1735:
1731:
1723:
1721:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1710:64.222.106.70
1707:
1696:
1694:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1679:Amishophobia?
1678:
1676:
1675:
1670:
1664:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1641:
1639:
1638:
1635:
1633:
1627:
1619:
1617:
1616:
1613:
1608:
1607:
1601:
1599:
1595:
1592:
1586:
1584:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1565:
1564:
1559:
1555:
1553:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1541:
1537:
1534:
1529:
1528:
1523:
1522:
1520:
1516:
1508:
1502:
1493:
1481:
1466:
1463:
1462:
1457:) for others.
1455:
1448:
1441:
1430:
1426:
1419:
1418:historic page
1410:
1407:
1404:
1401:
1394:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1363:Mass Deletion
1362:
1356:
1351:
1345:
1344:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1329:
1324:
1318:
1312:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1301:
1295:
1294:
1281:
1277:
1271:
1264:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1253:
1251:
1247:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1235:
1234:
1229:
1223:
1222:
1210:
1206:
1203:
1199:
1194:
1191:
1190:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1183:
1181:
1177:
1169:
1167:
1166:
1163:
1161:
1151:
1147:
1142:
1136:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1117:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1091:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1062:
1060:
1059:
1054:
1048:
1042:
1034:
1028:
1025:
1023:
1017:
1014:
1010:
1007:
1004:
1000:
999:
994:
990:
989:
988:
987:
983:
980:
976:
972:
968:
967:
962:
961:
960:
959:
956:
954:
947:
945:
941:
937:
932:
930:
926:
925:David Gerrold
922:
918:
914:
910:
902:
899:
896:
895:
894:
892:
891:The Prokonsul
884:
882:
875:
873:
872:
869:
865:
857:
855:
854:
851:
843:
841:
840:
837:
836:GatesPlusPlus
828:
826:
824:
820:
811:
809:
808:
805:
797:
795:
793:
789:
785:
784:190.196.41.95
781:
774:
771:
767:
761:
759:
756:
753:
751:
743:
741:
739:
735:
731:
727:
721:
719:
715:
702:
694:
687:
683:
679:
676:
672:
671:
654:
652:
651:
646:
643:
641:
640:
635:
632:
630:
629:
624:
623:
620:
616:
612:
611:
608:
605:
602:
599:
596:
593:
590:
587:
584:
581:
577:
575:
571:
560:
558:
557:
541:
537:
531:
528:
527:
523:
517:
514:
513:
510:
493:
489:
485:
484:
479:
476:
472:
471:
467:
458:
455:
452:
448:
436:
419:
415:
411:
410:
402:
396:
391:
389:
386:
382:
381:
377:
374:
371:
368:
364:
351:
345:
342:
341:
338:
321:
317:
313:
312:
304:
298:
293:
291:
288:
284:
283:
279:
276:
273:
270:
266:
253:
249:
243:
240:
239:
236:
219:
215:
211:
210:
202:
191:
189:
186:
182:
181:
177:
171:
168:
165:
161:
156:
152:
146:
138:
134:
129:
128:
121:
116:
108:
106:
105:
101:
98:
94:
93:
89:
87:
86:
82:
79:
78:July 27, 2008
75:
74:
70:
67:
64:
63:
58:
54:
50:
49:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2100:209.33.19.39
2092:
2064:
2055:who ignored
2052:
2015:Good Reasons
2014:
2000:
1986:carelessness
1982:
1974:
1923:
1911:
1871:
1856:technophilia
1844:In addendum,
1843:
1828:
1824:
1805:
1781:— Preceding
1777:
1751:
1727:
1700:
1682:
1645:
1625:
1623:
1604:
1602:
1597:
1590:
1589:
1587:
1580:
1574:
1562:
1561:
1545:
1525:
1514:
1509:
1500:
1497:
1488:
1478:
1471:<ref: -->
1454:in this line
1453:
1417:
1402:
1393:Technophobia
1376:96.235.20.63
1366:
1342:
1292:
1285:
1256:
1243:
1220:
1213:
1184:
1173:
1155:
1118:
1092:
1066:
1038:
1012:
996:
975:Technophilia
964:
948:
944:future shock
933:
920:
906:
888:
879:
863:
861:
847:
832:
815:
801:
775:
772:
768:
765:
757:
754:
747:
722:
698:
648:
647:
637:
636:
626:
625:
607:
600:
594:
588:
582:
574:Technophobia
568:
562:
535:
481:
407:
309:
247:
207:
151:WikiProjects
119:
102:
83:
48:reassessment
46:
31:
30:
27:Technophobia
26:
1950:habituation
1864:automobiles
1787:Rvvermeulen
1754:—Preceding
1732:, with the
1704:—Preceding
1370:—Preceding
1246:transcluded
1176:transcluded
1096:—Preceding
1070:—Preceding
998:prima facie
966:I Am Legend
919:(& how
778:—Preceding
718:NYSunflower
460:Start‑class
43:renominated
2116:Categories
2011:Arne Ă–hman
1971:basophobia
1942:Paul Bloom
1910:See also,
1697:Falsehoods
1686:TREKphiler
1631:TREKphiler
1456:<g: -->
1263:WP:CITE/ES
1202:WP:CITE/ES
1159:TREKphiler
1021:TREKphiler
952:TREKphiler
744:Irrational
570:To-do list
423:Technology
414:technology
373:Technology
223:Psychology
214:Psychology
170:Psychology
109:Not listed
90:Not listed
2065:so poorly
2019:neophobia
1999:noted in
1808:Pacingpal
1620:Causation
1429:this page
1238:GA Review
1170:GA Review
325:Sociology
316:sociology
275:Sociology
2061:Facebook
1886:Facebook
1795:contribs
1783:unsigned
1756:unsigned
1706:unsigned
1542:Examples
1447:Cite web
1372:unsigned
1270:cite web
1110:contribs
1098:unsigned
1084:contribs
1072:unsigned
858:examples
780:unsigned
730:PrimeBOT
497:Robotics
488:Robotics
457:Robotics
1742:Caprica
1409:history
1280:WP:LEAD
1209:WP:LEAD
1063:Updates
639:Cleanup
598:refresh
586:history
538:on the
250:on the
141:C-class
68:Process
2059:(e.g.
1969:, and
1890:Amazon
1884:(e.g.
1870:; see
1734:Cylons
1649:before
1563:looks'
1515:/: -->
1015:, too.
993:WP:3RR
936:greens
915:) nor
909:Arnold
650:Expand
147:scale.
71:Result
29:was a
2094:here
1948:that
1946:noted
1668:talk
1657:diffs
1653:after
1571:diff3
1558:diff2
1552:diff1
1406:links
1322:talk
1248:from
1178:from
1152:Usage
1140:talk
1121:Mrm62
1102:Mrm62
1076:Mrm62
1052:talk
977:. Or
868:RJFJR
850:RJFJR
844:Amish
592:watch
516:Start
2104:talk
2073:talk
2053:that
2031:talk
1988:and
1944:has
1932:talk
1922:and
1918:and
1902:talk
1888:and
1862:and
1834:talk
1812:talk
1791:talk
1764:talk
1714:talk
1484:...
1425:this
1403:talk
1400:edit
1380:talk
1349:talk
1343:King
1340:Gary
1313:. --
1299:talk
1293:King
1290:Gary
1227:talk
1221:King
1218:Gary
1125:talk
1106:talk
1080:talk
1003:this
971:"ST"
917:Shat
862:The
821:and
788:talk
750:NPOV
734:talk
708:and
686:here
580:edit
572:for
65:Date
1981:of
1914:by
1876:by
1749:).
1659:.--
1611:nkB
1606:Fra
1532:nkB
1527:Fra
1519:-->
1506:-->
1427:or
1013:why
921:did
728:by
530:Low
344:???
242:Low
2118::
2106:)
2075:)
2033:)
1965:,
1934:)
1904:)
1836:)
1814:)
1797:)
1793:•
1766:)
1716:)
1655:,
1651:,
1585:!
1450:}}
1444:{{
1432:)
1382:)
1273:}}
1267:{{
1112:)
1108:•
1086:)
1082:•
931:.
834:--
790:)
736:)
720:.
2102:(
2071:(
2029:(
1992:.
1930:(
1900:(
1832:(
1810:(
1789:(
1762:(
1712:(
1665:|
1482:)
1480:'
1413:)
1396:(
1378:(
1352:)
1346:(
1319:|
1302:)
1296:(
1230:)
1224:(
1137:|
1123:(
1104:(
1078:(
1049:|
938:(
786:(
732:(
688:.
653::
642::
631::
601:·
595:·
589:·
583:·
576::
542:.
352:.
254:.
153::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
