Knowledge

Talk:The New York Times Building

Source đź“ť

1437: 1777: 297: 276: 507: 486: 402: 1027:
article's content to the time it housed The New York Times. Also, it suggests that the building has only housed The New York Times, but the building is planned for redevelopment. I suppose that the address could redirect to the article, and it could be mentioned as an alternative name, until such time that the address or another name clearly becomes the dominant name for it. If that time comes, the article could be moved. What do you think? --
381: 412: 190: 1068:
address, using it for the article name is fine with me. To determine most common usage, I would suggest Google and Google News searches (you can try limiting the Google searches to recently created/updated pages to get a feel of what is common now, instead of in the past, but I have found that that function does not work very well). It might be a good idea to ask a few Wikipedians who are New Yorkers, too. See
581: 245: 917:
editors have expressed specific criticism of the content of this page; in particular the detailed information regarding the political motivations of each climber. Maxschmelling and I have neither suggested that the information is not encyclopedic, nor suggested that no information on the climbers appear on this page. Rather, we have proposed moving details of these events to more appropriate pages.
1857: 675: 624: 307: 1759: 1751: 1740: 1711: 1703: 1674: 1654: 1643: 1614: 1603: 1787: 980:, the building at 229 West 43rd Street (it does not seem to have an article), or the building that this article is about. I suggest that either disambiguation be made at the top of this article or that this become a disambiguation page. Since there are currently only two articles, I do not think that a disambiguation page is the way to go. Also, 1053:(AT&T) but that has an anchor tenant. I would keep it as the address since that will never change. The opening sentence can address its former title since it's still largely known by that name, and we can link to it from this The New York Times Building page. And yes we can always rename the page if a large anchor tenant/owner comes along. 937:
removing the lower ceramic rods—so as to make it less...well, climbable. So these incidents have definitely had a lasting impact on the building. Plus I think it's damned interesting that all of the climbers did it ostensibly to hang some banner to gain attention for some cause. It isn't like if editors to the
812:
I concur with the sentiment that the section on climbers needs to edited. I believe that this section focuses to much attention on the causes of these climbers. This seems like an attempt to create a forum for the political views of the climbers, which is not relevant to an article on this building.
956:
I have no problem with the "Climbers" section per se, but I view wikipedia as an information outlet not an advertising outlet. The fact that wikipedia mentions the climbers' "causes," specifically a link to "The Solution is Simple" seems more like accomplishing what the climber wanted (aka publicity
936:
Maybe I'm biased because I work in the building, but the climbers are a significant part of the building's (at this time, short) history. Tourists are now drawn to it just because of those incidents. They're also trying to modify the building—by covering some of the lower gridwork with wood and by
884:
movie articles which are very very poorly written without references. Parenthetically, if you would later contribute well and learn to edit Wikpedia stye, and, if you, like me - a "Most Excellent Grognard, Yeoman Editor" would be later entitled to this kind of editor thing, then you can command with
833:
The climbing feat is notable within the parameters of Knowledge. If professional readers or researchers like the Police would read Wiki, to research on these legal matters, inter alia, preserving this climbing thing would, in the future benefit Wiki readers. It is nonsense to contemplate climbing as
777:
Why is there a section in this article called climbers? It seems to be only very superficially related to the building. I can imagine an article called "urban climbers" or something that would talk about people who climb buildings illegally, but adding a section to every building's article is pretty
921:
already has a page into which that content can be folded, assuming that editors of that page have not done so. If protests of this kind are prevalent enough that "professional" readers or the police will seek information on Knowledge as you suggest, then there should already be the critical mass to
957:
for the climber's personal cause) than what is important for the wikipedia fact-based community. Due to this, I feel like I should keep the name of the cause (as it is understandable if a reader is interested) but delete the link as it is a free outlet for advertising on a mass-trafficked website.
879:
students, BSU article is state of the Art. So, it is just a matter of style. Some editors like me, would like longer edits, since many links would die in time due to pay-per-view markets. So, it is better that other editors would trim my edits than I would add very little. Get the point? I suggest
691:
While I appreciate there are items that must be addressed before Times Building will be wholly and completely finished, I believe that the text can describe the building as "completed", regardless of whether an external hoist has been dismantled. The building is now occupied and as such should be
1079:
If you decide to go with the address, even if it is not the most common usage, I will not object. Using the address will probably become more common in the future anyway, unless a new anchor tenant takes up residence. I will leave the decision up to you and take this page off my watchlist. If you
1067:
Good work on digging up examples of other articles with addresses for names, Ando228. Most common usage is the most important naming criterion, so I still suggest going with whatever name is currently most common, and changing the name in the future, if necessary. If the most common usage is the
707:
I have made the changed previously suggested: changing tense where appropriate, removing unnecessary minutiae in the introduction and tenants sections, and clarifying thoughts in the Background section. I believe the changes make the article more encyclopedic, less prone to becoming dated, and a
1026:
Using the address seems a bit odd, but I am unaware of an convention for or against it. The usual practice is to use the most common name, unless there is a very good reason not to. Perhaps the article could be titled "The New York Times Building (former)". However, that would seem to limit the
916:
I began the article on the New York Times building and have contributed significantly to its content and editing. I do not believe it is your place to direct others, who have been active in the development of an article, to edit different pages to allow you a free hand to edit as you will. Two
1790:
I think ALT0 is the best, so reviewing for that. Several elements assumed to have been covered during the GAN, and the rest all check out. Image is fine but not particularly compelling, so not sure that promoter will choose to use it. Once QPQ is completed, this will be good to go.
984:
has an alternative name to "The New York Times Building". However, if an article is written about the building at 229 West 43rd Street and it is not commonly referred to by another name (I do not know if it is or is not), I would suggest that this become a disambiguation page. --
1004:) but the title seems to be used in recent news reports as often as former home of The New York Times or old New York Times Building. Tishman Speyer, who sold the building in June 2007 to Africa Israel USA, officially just called it by its street name 793:
According to some informal Google news archive searches, 25% of all stories ever written about the building are about or at least mention the climbing incidents :-) I agree an entire section is overblown, but a sentence or two would be warranted.
813:
However, the building has proven to be a draw to a number of climbers - either because of its design or because a high-profile media organization is located inside - and that general fact does seem relevant to a complete article on the building.
856:
I do agree that the climbs are notable, my issue is with their relevance to this article. I think a short section along the lines of what Jaedglass said, that the building has proven to be a draw to a number of climbers, would be reasonable.
153: 1076:. You could ask them directly on their talk page or set up a poll. You could also invite New Yorkers to a poll using their talk pages. You do not have to do any of this if you do not want to, it is just a suggestion. 1934:
I don't know how to edit a page, so I'd just like to suggest that you add a small sentence near where you describe the interior garden to Cornelia Hahn Oberlander who already has a page in Knowledge.
1912: 1420: 667: 1049:, which was formerly the Bear Stearns World Headquarters (and is still titled as such in-page). At the other end, another "formerly known as" building that doesn't use an address in the title is 1255: 1150:
I will follow the above recommendations. And for your amusement since the Times simultaneously owned One Times Square and 229 W. 43rd, they called 1 Times Square the "Times Tower."
147: 1551: 913:
rather offensive, and for someone so confident as to puff up their writing and editorial skill, while disparaging the contributions of others, your English grammar is atrocious.
2010: 44: 763:
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class.
2015: 1008:. When choosing titles we should probably consider what building people have in mind when searching for The New York Times Building. I'm all for creating a page at 1990: 1305: 1301: 1287: 468: 458: 1012:
for the old building if addresses are in keeping with Wiki style. Too bad the Landmarks Preservation Commission hasn't digitized their old designations reports.
1980: 363: 353: 559: 201: 1098:
I was getting ready to post an article about the 43rd Street name and found this. Since I'm almost done with it I will post it initially under its address
2005: 1995: 1970: 1121: 549: 79: 2020: 1985: 1256:
https://web.archive.org/20090414202655/http://www.nypost.com:80/seven/06042008/news/regionalnews/2nd_man_climbs_west_side_building_in_cop_114131.htm
1129: 1103: 663: 434: 1975: 725: 329: 1905: 1265: 525: 1453:
was designed to protect against terrorist attacks, planners did not consider that the façade could be climbed until several people scaled it?
2000: 1259: 1080:
want to get my attention, please use my talk page. However, I am commonly absent for long periods, so it might be a while before I reply. --
1073: 875:
which was created by a not so good Wiki editor, and later, after I added Bulacan Courts, with just 2 sentences - look, now, with BSU's great
659:
was designed to protect against terrorist attacks, planners did not consider that the façade could be climbed until several people scaled it?
85: 222: 1128:
in their list of tallest buildings. Emporis is a great source but I wouldn't choose a building's name because of them. Please do create a
871:
Precisely, Knowledge articles are not static. Most of them rather, like stubs and start-classes metamorphose into great articles. Example:
168: 1069: 425: 386: 215: 135: 1041:
I don't know if it's an established convention but there are more than 30 New York skyscrapers with entries titled by their address at
1436: 729: 320: 281: 514: 491: 1965: 749:
So did they purposely make this building 1 foot shorter than the Chrysler Building out of respect or is that just coincidence?
207: 99: 30: 1660: 129: 104: 20: 1457:
Barron, James; Pogrebin, Robin (June 7, 2008). "Times Imposes Security Measures After Climbers' Stunts". The New York Times.
74: 1920: 1668: 256: 125: 1489:
requested hundreds of millions of dollars in tax exemptions, only to receive that amount by selling an older building?
1528: 1503: 1485: 1467: 1449: 1379: 1227: 655: 65: 24: 1001: 433:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 1400: 890: 839: 175: 1304:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1637: 1050: 872: 589: 1901:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
1916: 1266:
https://web.archive.org/20080714221722/http://news.yahoo.com:80/s/ap/20080709/ap_on_re_us/skyscraper_climber
862: 783: 733: 109: 1475:
Stephens, Suzanne (February 19, 2008). "The New York Times Building" (PDF). Architectural Record. 196: 103.
1095: 1770: 1745: 1697: 1608: 1597: 1260:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/06042008/news/regionalnews/2nd_man_climbs_west_side_building_in_cop_114131.htm
1157: 1111: 876: 189: 141: 1396: 1343: 1323:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1311: 938: 906: 886: 835: 750: 639: 262: 922:
create a separate page on these events, linked to their target buildings, as Maxschmelling suggested.
1845: 1827: 1664: 1565: 1492: 1269: 1099: 417: 1943: 1536:
Haberman, Clyde (June 8, 2007). "Movers Come to Times Sq., but the Name Stays". The New York Times.
927: 818: 764: 312: 161: 55: 524:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
328:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1947: 1465:: ... that a sewer-pipe manufacturer created the ceramic-rod curtain wall on the exterior of the 1046: 962: 910: 858: 799: 779: 599: 70: 1517: 1308:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
623: 1324: 1042: 296: 275: 1840:, sorry to disturb you, but is there any update on the nomination? I did a QPQ four days ago. 1456: 1237: 1171: 1153: 1141: 1107: 1058: 1017: 1005: 946: 211: 51: 1532:
was developed on the outskirts of the Times Square neighborhood, named after the newspaper?
1339: 1209: 1085: 1032: 990: 981: 977: 1331: 506: 485: 1841: 1823: 1734: 1561: 1245: 1201: 1535: 1136:
for the old NY Times building since the name is at the mercy of the owner/anchor tenant.
1951: 1924: 1878: 1849: 1831: 1809: 1569: 1404: 1351: 1213: 1175: 1161: 1145: 1115: 1089: 1062: 1036: 1021: 994: 966: 950: 931: 894: 866: 843: 822: 803: 787: 767: 753: 737: 712: 696: 1938:. She's an important landscape architect and is the namesake for the Oberlander Prize: 1648: 1290:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 923: 814: 709: 693: 1330:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1204:
for a discussion about using "the" in the name of an article about an NYC building. --
401: 380: 1959: 1897:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
1120:
Hmmm, I can agree to that. The building's website still uses "building", however the
1094:
We should go by the Emporis naming structure and it calls this New York Times Tower.
958: 795: 604: 430: 1364:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
1167: 1137: 1054: 1013: 976:
It seems like "The New York Times Building" could refer to one of three buildings,
942: 918: 325: 644: 1151: 1493:
Moses, Paul (November 16, 2004). "The Times' Sweetheart Deal". The Village Voice
1297: 1205: 1081: 1028: 986: 1856: 1370:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
1786: 1296:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 881: 580: 520: 407: 302: 941:
article tried to describe why everyone who jumped wanted to commit suicide.
1866: 1837: 1817: 1797: 1474: 634: 518:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to 880:
further, that instead of daily editing all my edits, you can contribute to
1889: 1242:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
1096:
http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=newyorktimestower-newyorkcity-ny-usa
306: 1935: 1382:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 1727:
Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
1270:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080709/ap_on_re_us/skyscraper_climber
1250:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
1045:. A similar situation to the old NY Times building seems to be at 1518:
Dunlap, David W. (June 10, 2007). "'Copy!'". The New York Times.
1000:
229 W. 43rd was definitely called The New York Times Building (
1942:. And the landscape architect for the garden in the building. 1510:
design was intended to contrast with the traditional image of
618: 575: 238: 184: 15: 1939: 668:
Template:Did you know nominations/The New York Times Building
1630:
Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
1275:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
673: 1425: 1416: 1231: 1226:
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
228: 666:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 160: 1720: 1683: 1623: 1583: 885:
Wiki authority. But as of now, please remain calm. --
1166:
Just goes to show... Thanks for doing the leg work.
429:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 324:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1690:Hook has been verified by provided inline citation 1300:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 214:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1930:Cornelia Hahn Oberlander - Landscape Architect 1911:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 1286:This message was posted before February 2018. 174: 8: 1936:https://en.wikipedia.org/Cornelia_Oberlander 1854:So sorry about that! I missed this somehow. 1822:Thanks for the review. I've done a QPQ now. 1384:No further edits should be made to this page 1122:Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat 1002:NY Times article on designation as landmark 2011:WikiProject Skyscrapers articles and lists 480: 375: 270: 647:). The text of the entry was as follows: 1130:New York Times Building (disambiguation) 1104:New York Times Building (disambiguation) 664:Knowledge:Recent additions/2021/November 2016:Knowledge pages referenced by the press 745:Relationship with other NYC skyscrapers 482: 377: 272: 1590:Article is new enough and long enough 1991:Mid-importance New York City articles 1074:Category:Wikipedians in New York City 662:A record of the entry may be seen at 7: 1981:Mid-importance Architecture articles 512:This article is within the scope of 423:This article is within the scope of 318:This article is within the scope of 244: 242: 1560:Improved to Good Article status by 1070:Knowledge:WikiProject New York City 834:petty thing. It is encyclopedic. -- 600:"Don't Trust Anything on Knowledge" 443:Knowledge:WikiProject New York City 261:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 2006:Mid-importance Skyscraper articles 1996:WikiProject New York City articles 1971:Art and architecture good articles 1906:New York Times Building Facade.png 598:Cuozzo, Steve (16 November 2013). 446:Template:WikiProject New York City 338:Knowledge:WikiProject Architecture 202:Art and architecture good articles 14: 1514:as an "old-fashioned newspaper"? 1230:. Please take a moment to review 1124:, a good definitive source, uses 674: 590:mentioned by a media organization 534:Knowledge:WikiProject Skyscrapers 341:Template:WikiProject Architecture 210:. If you can improve it further, 1855: 1785: 1775: 1757: 1749: 1738: 1709: 1701: 1672: 1652: 1641: 1612: 1601: 1435: 1043:the category for NYC skyscrapers 692:described as such for readers. 622: 579: 537:Template:WikiProject Skyscrapers 505: 484: 410: 400: 379: 305: 295: 274: 243: 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2021:Knowledge Did you know articles 1986:GA-Class New York City articles 1367:Please do not modify this page. 554:This article has been rated as 463:This article has been rated as 358:This article has been rated as 1976:GA-Class Architecture articles 1202:Talk:The Dakota#Requested move 1176:19:51, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 1162:17:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 1146:16:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 1116:13:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 198:has been listed as one of the 1: 1879:15:42, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 1850:15:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 1483:: ... that the developers of 1405:02:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC) 1090:07:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1063:17:38, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 1037:04:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 1022:21:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 754:19:58, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 528:and see a list of open tasks. 437:and see a list of open tasks. 332:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2001:GA-Class Skyscraper articles 1952:13:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 1925:05:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC) 1832:14:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC) 1810:00:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC) 1570:13:27, 28 October 2021 (UTC) 1352:01:17, 15 January 2016 (UTC) 768:03:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 738:18:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 643:column on 20 November 2021 ( 1504:The New York Times Building 1486:The New York Times Building 1468:The New York Times Building 1450:The New York Times Building 1441:The New York Times Building 1380:Knowledge talk:Did you know 1372:this nomination's talk page 1228:The New York Times Building 995:03:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 909:, I found your response to 713:02:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC) 697:20:41, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 656:The New York Times Building 631:The New York Times Building 196:The New York Times Building 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 25:The New York Times Building 2037: 1940:https://www.tclf.org/prize 1317:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1248:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 1223:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 560:project's importance scale 469:project's importance scale 364:project's importance scale 1214:14:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 951:14:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 932:14:01, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 895:07:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 867:13:34, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 844:12:19, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 823:02:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 804:00:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 553: 500: 462: 426:WikiProject New York City 395: 357: 290: 269: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1132:page. I would still use 1051:Sony Building (New York) 967:03:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 873:Bulacan State University 788:21:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 759:WikiProject class rating 633:appeared on Knowledge's 321:WikiProject Architecture 1966:Knowledge good articles 1529:New York Times Building 1526:: ... that the current 1376:the article's talk page 1357:Did you know nomination 1219:External links modified 515:WikiProject Skyscrapers 1102:but I think we need a 877:Information Technology 679: 588:This article has been 449:New York City articles 251:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 1568:). Self-nominated at 939:Empire State Building 728:comment was added by 677: 344:Architecture articles 226:: October 27, 2021. ( 208:good article criteria 100:Neutral point of view 1661:copyright violations 1552:Golf Club: Wasteland 1298:regular verification 1283:to let others know. 1234:. If necessary, add 1134:229 West 43rd Street 1126:New York Times Tower 1100:229 West 43rd Street 1010:229 West 43rd Street 418:New York City portal 105:No original research 1288:After February 2018 1279:parameter below to 703:October 5 Revisions 540:Skyscraper articles 313:Architecture portal 1917:Community Tech bot 1860:for ALT0. Cheers, 1669:close paraphrasing 1512:The New York Times 1293:InternetArchiveBot 1047:383 Madison Avenue 680: 257:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1876: 1864: 1807: 1795: 1767: 1766: 1719: 1718: 1682: 1681: 1638:Adequate sourcing 1622: 1621: 1573: 1538: 1520: 1495: 1477: 1459: 1350: 1318: 741: 684: 683: 617: 616: 574: 573: 570: 569: 566: 565: 479: 478: 475: 474: 374: 373: 370: 369: 237: 236: 233: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2028: 1877: 1874: 1873: 1871: 1862: 1859: 1821: 1808: 1805: 1804: 1802: 1793: 1789: 1779: 1778: 1761: 1760: 1756:Clear at 100px: 1753: 1752: 1742: 1741: 1721: 1713: 1712: 1705: 1704: 1684: 1676: 1675: 1656: 1655: 1645: 1644: 1624: 1616: 1615: 1605: 1604: 1584: 1559: 1533: 1515: 1509: 1490: 1472: 1454: 1439: 1397:Theleekycauldron 1391:The result was: 1369: 1346: 1345:Talk to my owner 1341: 1316: 1315: 1294: 1249: 1241: 982:One Times Square 978:One Times Square 907:Florentino floro 887:Florentino floro 836:Florentino floro 723: 676: 626: 619: 609: 583: 576: 542: 541: 538: 535: 532: 509: 502: 501: 496: 488: 481: 451: 450: 447: 444: 441: 420: 415: 414: 413: 404: 397: 396: 391: 383: 376: 346: 345: 342: 339: 336: 315: 310: 309: 299: 292: 291: 286: 278: 271: 254: 248: 247: 246: 239: 231: 229:Reviewed version 220: 192: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2036: 2035: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2027: 2026: 2025: 1956: 1955: 1932: 1913:nomination page 1899: 1894: 1867: 1865: 1861: 1815: 1798: 1796: 1792: 1776: 1758: 1750: 1746:Used in article 1739: 1735:Freely licensed 1710: 1702: 1673: 1653: 1642: 1613: 1602: 1507: 1447:... that while 1444: 1443: 1442: 1432: 1430: 1426:Article history 1365: 1359: 1349: 1344: 1309: 1302:have permission 1292: 1243: 1235: 1221: 1198: 974: 775: 761: 747: 724:—The preceding 722:...I'm stupid. 720: 705: 689: 653:... that while 613: 612: 597: 593: 539: 536: 533: 530: 529: 494: 448: 445: 442: 439: 438: 416: 411: 409: 389: 343: 340: 337: 334: 333: 311: 304: 284: 255:on Knowledge's 252: 227: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2034: 2032: 2024: 2023: 2018: 2013: 2008: 2003: 1998: 1993: 1988: 1983: 1978: 1973: 1968: 1958: 1957: 1931: 1928: 1909: 1908: 1898: 1895: 1892:without image 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1780: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1754: 1743: 1729: 1728: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1706: 1692: 1691: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1657: 1646: 1632: 1631: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1606: 1592: 1591: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1521: 1496: 1478: 1440: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1428: 1423: 1413: 1411: 1407: 1389: 1388: 1360: 1358: 1355: 1342: 1336: 1335: 1328: 1273: 1272: 1264:Added archive 1262: 1254:Added archive 1220: 1217: 1197: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1077: 973: 972:Disambiguation 970: 955: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 849: 848: 847: 846: 828: 827: 826: 825: 807: 806: 774: 771: 765:BetacommandBot 760: 757: 746: 743: 719: 718:Ethereal look? 716: 708:clearer read. 704: 701: 688: 685: 682: 681: 671: 661: 660: 627: 615: 614: 611: 610: 594: 587: 586: 584: 572: 571: 568: 567: 564: 563: 556:Mid-importance 552: 546: 545: 543: 526:the discussion 510: 498: 497: 495:Mid‑importance 489: 477: 476: 473: 472: 465:Mid-importance 461: 455: 454: 452: 435:the discussion 422: 421: 405: 393: 392: 390:Mid‑importance 384: 372: 371: 368: 367: 360:Mid-importance 356: 350: 349: 347: 330:the discussion 317: 316: 300: 288: 287: 285:Mid‑importance 279: 267: 266: 260: 249: 235: 234: 219: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2033: 2022: 2019: 2017: 2014: 2012: 2009: 2007: 2004: 2002: 1999: 1997: 1994: 1992: 1989: 1987: 1984: 1982: 1979: 1977: 1974: 1972: 1969: 1967: 1964: 1963: 1961: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1929: 1927: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1907: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1896: 1893: 1891: 1880: 1872: 1870: 1858: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1819: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1803: 1801: 1788: 1783: 1773: 1772: 1755: 1747: 1744: 1736: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1726: 1723: 1722: 1708:Interesting: 1707: 1699: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1689: 1686: 1685: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1650: 1647: 1639: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1626: 1625: 1610: 1607: 1599: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1589: 1586: 1585: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1553: 1549: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1537: 1531: 1530: 1525: 1522: 1519: 1513: 1506: 1505: 1500: 1497: 1494: 1488: 1487: 1482: 1479: 1476: 1470: 1469: 1464: 1461: 1460: 1458: 1452: 1451: 1446: 1445: 1438: 1427: 1424: 1422: 1418: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1408: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1387: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1368: 1362: 1361: 1356: 1354: 1353: 1347: 1340: 1333: 1329: 1326: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1313: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1289: 1284: 1282: 1278: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1247: 1239: 1233: 1229: 1224: 1218: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1195: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1152: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1078: 1075: 1071: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1006:on their site 1003: 999: 998: 997: 996: 992: 988: 983: 979: 971: 969: 968: 964: 960: 953: 952: 948: 944: 940: 934: 933: 929: 925: 920: 914: 912: 908: 896: 892: 888: 883: 878: 874: 870: 869: 868: 864: 860: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 845: 841: 837: 832: 831: 830: 829: 824: 820: 816: 811: 810: 809: 808: 805: 801: 797: 792: 791: 790: 789: 785: 781: 772: 770: 769: 766: 758: 756: 755: 752: 751:Rubberchicken 744: 742: 739: 735: 731: 727: 717: 715: 714: 711: 702: 700: 698: 695: 686: 672: 669: 665: 658: 657: 652: 649: 648: 646: 642: 641: 636: 632: 628: 625: 621: 620: 607: 606: 605:New York Post 601: 596: 595: 591: 585: 582: 578: 577: 561: 557: 551: 548: 547: 544: 527: 523: 522: 517: 516: 511: 508: 504: 503: 499: 493: 490: 487: 483: 470: 466: 460: 457: 456: 453: 440:New York City 436: 432: 431:New York City 428: 427: 419: 408: 406: 403: 399: 398: 394: 388: 387:New York City 385: 382: 378: 365: 361: 355: 352: 351: 348: 331: 327: 323: 322: 314: 308: 303: 301: 298: 294: 293: 289: 283: 280: 277: 273: 268: 264: 258: 250: 241: 240: 230: 225: 224: 217: 213: 209: 205: 204: 203: 197: 194: 191: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1933: 1910: 1900: 1887: 1868: 1799: 1781: 1769: 1768: 1724: 1687: 1627: 1587: 1558: 1547: 1527: 1523: 1511: 1502: 1498: 1484: 1480: 1466: 1462: 1448: 1409: 1392: 1390: 1383: 1375: 1371: 1366: 1363: 1337: 1312:source check 1291: 1285: 1280: 1276: 1274: 1225: 1222: 1199: 1196:Article name 1154:Americasroof 1133: 1125: 1108:Americasroof 1009: 975: 954: 935: 919:Alain Robert 915: 905: 776: 762: 748: 730:85.138.0.221 721: 706: 690: 654: 651:Did you know 650: 640:Did you know 638: 630: 629:A fact from 603: 555: 519: 513: 464: 424: 359: 335:Architecture 326:Architecture 319: 282:Architecture 263:WikiProjects 221: 212:please do so 200: 199: 195: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1609:Long enough 1501:: ... that 645:check views 531:Skyscrapers 521:skyscrapers 492:Skyscrapers 148:free images 31:not a forum 1960:Categories 1842:Epicgenius 1824:Epicgenius 1665:plagiarism 1598:New enough 1562:Epicgenius 882:Philippine 699:Jaedglass 206:under the 1332:this tool 1325:this tool 924:Jaedglass 815:Jaedglass 710:Jaedglass 694:Jaedglass 678:Knowledge 635:Main Page 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1944:Tjayrush 1890:T:DYK/P4 1888:ALT0 to 1659:Free of 1588:General: 1548:Reviewed 1534:Source: 1516:Source: 1491:Source: 1473:Source: 1455:Source: 1393:promoted 1338:Cheers.— 1238:cbignore 959:Flypanam 796:Rividian 773:Climbers 726:unsigned 253:GA-class 216:reassess 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1782:Overall 1649:Neutral 1628:Policy: 1417:Comment 1348::Online 1277:checked 1232:my edit 1168:Ando228 1138:Ando228 1106:page. 1055:Ando228 1014:Ando228 943:Postdlf 778:silly. 637:in the 558:on the 467:on the 362:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1725:Image: 1667:, and 1246:nobots 1206:Enkyo2 1082:Kjkolb 1029:Kjkolb 987:Kjkolb 911:maxsch 859:maxsch 780:maxsch 259:scale. 223:Review 126:Google 1698:Cited 1688:Hook: 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1948:talk 1921:talk 1869:Sdkb 1863:{{u| 1846:talk 1838:Sdkb 1828:talk 1818:Sdkb 1800:Sdkb 1794:{{u| 1566:talk 1524:ALT4 1499:ALT3 1481:ALT2 1463:ALT1 1421:view 1401:talk 1281:true 1210:talk 1200:See 1172:talk 1158:talk 1142:talk 1112:talk 1086:talk 1072:and 1059:talk 1033:talk 1018:talk 991:talk 963:talk 947:talk 928:talk 891:talk 863:talk 840:talk 819:talk 800:talk 784:talk 734:talk 687:Text 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1915:. — 1771:QPQ 1419:or 1395:by 1378:or 1306:RfC 1268:to 1258:to 550:Mid 459:Mid 354:Mid 218:it. 176:TWL 1962:: 1950:) 1923:) 1875:}} 1848:) 1830:) 1806:}} 1784:: 1774:: 1748:: 1737:: 1700:: 1671:: 1663:, 1651:: 1640:: 1611:: 1600:: 1550:: 1508:'s 1471:? 1412:( 1403:) 1374:, 1319:. 1314:}} 1310:{{ 1244:{{ 1240:}} 1236:{{ 1212:) 1174:) 1160:) 1144:) 1114:) 1088:) 1061:) 1035:) 1020:) 993:) 965:) 949:) 930:) 893:) 865:) 842:) 821:) 802:) 794:-- 786:) 736:) 602:. 232:). 156:) 54:; 1946:( 1919:( 1844:( 1836:@ 1826:( 1820:: 1816:@ 1572:. 1564:( 1431:) 1399:( 1386:. 1334:. 1327:. 1208:( 1170:( 1156:( 1140:( 1110:( 1084:( 1057:( 1031:( 1016:( 989:( 961:( 945:( 926:( 889:( 861:( 838:( 817:( 798:( 782:( 740:. 732:( 670:. 608:. 592:: 562:. 471:. 366:. 265:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
The New York Times Building
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Good articles
Art and architecture good articles
good article criteria
please do so
reassess
Review
Reviewed version

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑