Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:The Chainsmokers discography

Source đź“ť

408:, which some love to quote) or merely just songs that charted. They sometimes even quote the artist saying "the album/EP doesn't have any singles released from it", even if that release was contemporaneous with the single. So I think we should put them all in one section. If we have reliable third-party sources calling them "singles" (whether editors think these publications just call every release a "single" or not) and iTunes releasing the song as a separate "single", then I say they should go under singles. If this is going to turn into a discussion or somebody replies to me, please don't ping me again; I'm not that concerned that I want to come back and reiterate my point over and over. 142: 160: 235: 214: 74: 53: 22: 848:
some time trying to find what defines a single and a promotional singles and what makes them different which has resulted in no 100% (or anywhere close) answer. So can someone help me with this so we can stop the constant reclassification of songs. In addition "Honest" doesn't appear to have any of the attributes according to
575:
Yeah I have no idea of what you're saying. I believe when Paris is out, they didn't say that it's going to be included in their upcoming debut album. If that's the case, the song wasn't released in promotion of the album, and it should be categorized as a non-album single here. And that way it should
399:
Just getting in early to say: I don't agree with the practice of separating singles that did not chart like the German Knowledge (XXG) seems to do. It seems that fans of certain acts, when these acts release singles that fail to chart or gain as much traction as their other singles, then try to argue
680:
If they didn't mention the album, it means the song was just later included in the album right? They never said "Oh Paris is gonna be in our debut album which will be released in April" or "Yeah we released Paris in promotion of our debut album that's going to be released sometime in April". As far
847:
I've noticed on this page that sons from the "singles" column stay there for a bit then are moved to the "promotional singles" column and vice versa. Then they stay there for a few months then are changed (often a few times) back and forth - more so on this discography than any others. I've spent
661:
Saying that a song is a single doesn't mean it's not from an album; that can simply mean they just didn't mention the album. Also, a digital remix EP released for a single is not a "remix album". Songs also don't necessarily have to be released alongside the album. We need more perspectives here.
646:
released in promotion of the album as it wasn't announced alongside the album. We don't know whether it was intended to be included in an upcoming album though, despite that the cover arts are somehow similar. In conclusion, the song wasn't announced alongside the album, and it wasn't released in
551:
I still think you don't understand what I'm saying. I'm asking you, as the user wanting a change, to please provide a source saying it was not originally intended to be on the album, because as far as I can see, you have changed it back to N/A, which is what the page said only in the short period
556:
of those compilation albums issued by the label, as EDM labels often collect their artists' latest popular tracks and issue them on a compilation (but that's not relevant for discussion here). Later being included on an album is not the issue: it's what's released in promotion of that album. I'm
746:
Should we all agree that Paris was released before the album (that's a fact) but wasn't the first song released off the album? Just because it was released before the album as a single and later included in the album doesn't necessarily mean that it's the first song released off the album. Now,
360:
Now that we've had a similar discussion on Martin Garrix's discography page, may I ask how it is any different here? Why is it that "Waterbed", "Good Intentions", "Until You Were Gone", "New York City" and the Tiësto collaboration "Split (Only U)" are not listed as singles, when "Erase", "The
361:
Rookie", "Let You Go" and "Kanye" are, despite being virtually no different? If it is because of lack of chart success, then shouldn't we remove all singles that are not "#SELFIE", "Roses", "Don't Let Me Down", "Inside Out", "Closer", "All We Know", "Setting Fires" and "Paris"?
914:
These are EPs, so I believe that they should be listed in the discography. Even if they are just extended versions of a single, they're still EPs, so they should be on here. Being part of a single release doesn't make any difference.
871:
So I am wondering why "Young" hasn't been listed in the single section. The "Midnight Kids Remix" was released as a digital single on 29 September 2017. Therefore, shouldn't the remixed version be listed as the 5th single from
814:, true but the difference is subtle and it would still technically be considered the first song released off the album because it's an album song and was released first. Basically, what the sources say matters more. 338:"no next single from The Chainsmokers has yet been announced; Columbia Records plans to release a follow-up to "Closer" in early January." Doesn't that mean the "singles" after "Closer" are not actually singles? -- 576:
just be N/A with a note saying that it's later included in the album, as we didn't cite a source that verifies that the song was either intended to be included in an upcoming album or released in promotion of it.
695:
Both songs ("Paris" and "Something Just Like This") were released at the same time in the album. And for "remix album", I'm just phrasing it that way, I know what it means as you've explained it to me before.
681:
as I know, the album was announced alongside Something Just Like This, that means Paris is not the first single of the album, then the list of songs sorted by their release dates in the album should be:
641:
by Entertainment Weekly said that Paris was a single when it was released initially (which we all know, it has its own remix album as well), nothing was said about the album. That verifies that the song
788: 727:
You're now just repeating yourself. As I said, we should wait for others to offer opinions on it because currently this is just a back-and-forth when we both know the other's position.
357:
I previously opened a discussion about the consensus of why several of the Chainsmokers' singles are not listed in the singles section, but have failed to receive a response.
979: 114: 984: 533:
What I meant was, if Paris was not intended to be released in promotion of the album and was just later included, then why it isn't a non-album single? Just like
90: 974: 537:
with Spectre and Force, they're both singles originally, but was later included in NCS' compilation albums, you stated that they're still non-album singles.
994: 180: 453:
Promotional singles are singles regardless whether they're promotional or not, they should be placed in the regular singles table not a separate one. -
289: 124: 81: 58: 989: 557:
pretty sure it's appearing as if "Paris" was the first single from an album whose title was not known at that time, but was announced soon after.
176: 167: 147: 1004: 335: 279: 485:
How do you know that it was intended to be on the album and released in promotion of it? Do we need a cite a source for that? Just curious.
826: 1009: 255: 999: 404:
and never has been the sole determining factor of whether something is a full single release or not, regardless of the WP guideline
590:
Your reply seems to indicate you know what I'm talking about. Well, I don't know who added that "Paris" is the first single from
849: 816: 33: 251: 247: 242: 219: 795:'Paris'". I know it can't serve as a source, but it means that Paris was indeed just later included on the album, right? 791:
of The Chainsmokers' YouTube channel just now, the bottom line reads "featuring 'Something Just Like This' with Coldplay
366: 320: 400:
that they aren't in fact singles at all, but "promotional" ("It wasn't released to radio!", even though US pop radio
511:
know that the album was not intended to be released in promotion of the album and was just later included on it?"
462: 439: 39: 937: 923: 750: 384: 881: 362: 336:
http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/7573655/hot-100-rae-sremmurd-black-beatles-number-one
316: 956: 343: 315:
which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
312: 89:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
405: 900: 594:
when the album came out, but the album article says so now, and the discography did as well. Also,
933: 919: 800: 760: 701: 652: 629: 581: 542: 490: 771: 729: 664: 608: 559: 517: 480: 410: 377: 595: 877: 647:
promotion of it, and was just later included, and that's why it should be a non-album single.
952: 857: 391: 339: 159: 141: 86: 960: 941: 927: 904: 885: 861: 834: 804: 782: 776: 764: 740: 734: 705: 675: 669: 656: 633: 619: 613: 606:
and said: "The first was “Paris,” the initial single released off Memories… Do Not Open."
585: 570: 564: 546: 528: 522: 494: 468: 445: 421: 415: 370: 347: 324: 951:
Im new to English and are wondering if its supposed to have a lowercase D in discography
638: 515:
want the change, not me. Also, no need to ping me on this page, as it's on my watchlist.
896: 968: 811: 796: 769:
People should analyse the situation for themselves and come to their own conclusion.
756: 697: 648: 625: 577: 538: 502: 486: 552:
before the album was known. As for Alan Walker, those were not singles released in
179:. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to 853: 172: 234: 213: 73: 52: 171:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s collection of 175:
articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit
15: 852:
to classify it as a single. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
690:"Break Up Every Night", "Bloodstream"...and "Last Day Alive" 254:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 534: 85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 507:did you read what I actually wrote? I asked "do 8: 99:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Electronic music 602:recently talked about their performance on 311:There is a split discussion in progress on 246:, an attempt to structure and organize all 334:According to this article from Billboard, 208: 136: 47: 21: 19: 189:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Discographies 980:Mid-importance electronic music articles 250:. If you wish to help, please visit the 165:This article is within the scope of the 210: 138: 49: 684:"Paris" and "Something Just Like This" 985:WikiProject Electronic music articles 102:Template:WikiProject Electronic music 7: 975:List-Class electronic music articles 240:This article is within the scope of 79:This article is within the scope of 850:Knowledge (XXG):Promotional singles 38:It is of interest to the following 995:WikiProject Discographies articles 192:Template:WikiProject Discographies 14: 264:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Lists 876:? Or has it just not been done? 233: 212: 158: 140: 72: 51: 20: 990:List-Class Discography articles 843:Singles and Promotional Singles 284:This article has been rated as 119:This article has been rated as 942:06:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC) 928:03:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC) 905:18:28, 17 September 2018 (UTC) 325:21:58, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1: 867:"Young" - listed as a single? 446:05:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC) 422:00:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC) 371:00:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC) 348:21:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 248:list pages on Knowledge (XXG) 93:and see a list of open tasks. 1005:Low-importance List articles 886:07:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC) 835:09:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC) 755:How does that sound to you? 307:Split discussion in progress 82:WikiProject Electronic music 1026: 1010:WikiProject Lists articles 961:00:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 895:Where is this band from?-- 805:05:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC) 783:15:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC) 765:13:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC) 741:12:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC) 706:12:28, 17 April 2017 (UTC) 676:05:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC) 657:02:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC) 634:16:34, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 620:12:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 586:11:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 571:09:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 547:08:58, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 529:07:33, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 495:06:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 290:project's importance scale 267:Template:WikiProject Lists 125:project's importance scale 862:21:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC) 469:03:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC) 283: 228: 168:Discographies WikiProject 153: 118: 105:electronic music articles 67: 46: 1000:List-Class List articles 932:Please disregard this. 910:Including the Remix EPs 181:the project's talk page 918:Any thoughts on this? 592:Memories...Do Not Open 28:This article is rated 430:Agreed with Ss112. - 313:Talk:The Chainsmokers 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 891:Where are they from? 600:Entertainment Weekly 353:Consensus of Singles 330:Singles from Collage 195:Discography articles 947:Is the grammar off? 34:content assessment 824: 751:TheMagnificentist 385:TheMagnificentist 363:Shoesquashfan5000 317:SomeoneNamedDerek 304: 303: 300: 299: 296: 295: 243:WikiProject Lists 207: 206: 203: 202: 135: 134: 131: 130: 1017: 822: 779: 774: 754: 737: 732: 672: 667: 616: 611: 567: 562: 525: 520: 506: 484: 467: 465: 460: 459: 444: 442: 437: 436: 418: 413: 395: 388: 381: 272: 271: 268: 265: 262: 237: 230: 229: 224: 216: 209: 197: 196: 193: 190: 187: 177:the project page 162: 155: 154: 144: 137: 107: 106: 103: 100: 97: 96:Electronic music 87:Electronic music 76: 69: 68: 63: 59:Electronic music 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 23: 16: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1016: 1015: 1014: 965: 964: 949: 912: 893: 869: 845: 777: 772: 748: 735: 730: 670: 665: 639:Another article 614: 609: 565: 560: 523: 518: 500: 478: 476: 463: 461: 455: 454: 440: 438: 432: 431: 416: 411: 389: 382: 375: 355: 332: 309: 269: 266: 263: 260: 259: 222: 194: 191: 188: 185: 184: 104: 101: 98: 95: 94: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 1023: 1021: 1013: 1012: 1007: 1002: 997: 992: 987: 982: 977: 967: 966: 948: 945: 911: 908: 892: 889: 868: 865: 844: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 809: 808: 807: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 693: 692: 691: 688: 685: 624:Alright then. 475: 472: 464:Magnificentist 451: 450: 449: 448: 441:Magnificentist 425: 424: 354: 351: 331: 328: 308: 305: 302: 301: 298: 297: 294: 293: 286:Low-importance 282: 276: 275: 273: 238: 226: 225: 223:Low‑importance 217: 205: 204: 201: 200: 198: 163: 151: 150: 145: 133: 132: 129: 128: 121:Mid-importance 117: 111: 110: 108: 91:the discussion 77: 65: 64: 62:Mid‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1022: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1003: 1001: 998: 996: 993: 991: 988: 986: 983: 981: 978: 976: 973: 972: 970: 963: 962: 958: 954: 946: 944: 943: 939: 935: 934:CountyCountry 930: 929: 925: 921: 920:CountyCountry 916: 909: 907: 906: 902: 898: 890: 888: 887: 883: 879: 875: 866: 864: 863: 859: 855: 851: 842: 836: 833: 832: 831: 830: 825: 820: 819: 813: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 790: 786: 785: 784: 781: 780: 775: 768: 767: 766: 762: 758: 752: 745: 744: 743: 742: 739: 738: 733: 707: 703: 699: 694: 689: 686: 683: 682: 679: 678: 677: 674: 673: 668: 660: 659: 658: 654: 650: 645: 640: 637: 636: 635: 631: 627: 623: 622: 621: 618: 617: 612: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 588: 587: 583: 579: 574: 573: 572: 569: 568: 563: 555: 550: 549: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 531: 530: 527: 526: 521: 514: 510: 504: 499: 498: 497: 496: 492: 488: 482: 473: 471: 470: 466: 458: 447: 443: 435: 429: 428: 427: 426: 423: 420: 419: 414: 407: 403: 398: 397: 396: 393: 386: 379: 373: 372: 368: 364: 358: 352: 350: 349: 345: 341: 337: 329: 327: 326: 322: 318: 314: 306: 291: 287: 281: 278: 277: 274: 270:List articles 257: 253: 249: 245: 244: 239: 236: 232: 231: 227: 221: 218: 215: 211: 199: 186:Discographies 182: 178: 174: 170: 169: 164: 161: 157: 156: 152: 149: 148:Discographies 146: 143: 139: 126: 122: 116: 113: 112: 109: 92: 88: 84: 83: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 18: 17: 950: 931: 917: 913: 894: 878:Tobyjamesaus 873: 870: 846: 828: 827: 821: 817: 815: 792: 770: 728: 726: 663: 643: 607: 603: 599: 591: 558: 553: 535:what you did 516: 512: 508: 477: 456: 452: 433: 409: 401: 374: 359: 356: 333: 310: 285: 252:project page 241: 166: 120: 80: 40:WikiProjects 953:BelowFlames 874:Memories... 392:Binksternet 340:Wishy-Washy 173:discography 969:Categories 823:with them 787:I saw the 596:an article 406:WP:SINGLE? 256:discussion 30:List-class 897:Dthomsen8 687:"The One" 554:promotion 829:hundreds 818:Flooded 812:Hayman30 797:Hayman30 757:Hayman30 698:Hayman30 649:Hayman30 626:Hayman30 578:Hayman30 539:Hayman30 503:Hayman30 487:Hayman30 288:on the 123:on the 854:Mn1548 789:banner 644:wasn't 402:is not 36:scale. 481:Ss112 474:Paris 378:Ss112 261:Lists 220:Lists 957:talk 938:talk 924:talk 901:talk 882:talk 858:talk 801:talk 793:plus 761:talk 702:talk 653:talk 630:talk 582:talk 543:talk 491:talk 367:talk 344:talk 321:talk 778:112 736:112 671:112 615:112 604:SNL 598:by 566:112 524:112 513:You 509:you 457:The 434:The 417:112 280:Low 115:Mid 971:: 959:) 940:) 926:) 903:) 884:) 860:) 803:) 773:Ss 763:) 731:Ss 704:) 666:Ss 655:) 632:) 610:Ss 584:) 561:Ss 545:) 519:Ss 493:) 412:Ss 369:) 346:) 323:) 955:( 936:( 922:( 899:( 880:( 856:( 799:( 759:( 753:: 749:@ 700:( 651:( 628:( 580:( 541:( 505:: 501:@ 489:( 483:: 479:@ 394:: 390:@ 387:: 383:@ 380:: 376:@ 365:( 342:( 319:( 292:. 258:. 183:. 127:. 42::

Index

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Electronic music
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Electronic music
Electronic music
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Discographies
WikiProject icon
Discographies WikiProject
discography
the project page
the project's talk page
WikiProject icon
Lists
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Lists
list pages on Knowledge (XXG)
project page
discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Talk:The Chainsmokers
SomeoneNamedDerek
talk
21:58, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑