2397:. Three noteworthy guests were also announced before the season premiered (Jim Broadbent, Olivia Williams, and Jack Lowden). Each episode lists the actors in the end credits, but with a different format from the first season. While there are still no actors in the opening title sequence, there is now a list of actors that get billed similar to the main-on-end sequence in a film before the actual cast list is shown. For example, the first episode of S2 gives single billing on screen—in order of appearance—to Charlie Vickers, Morfydd Clark, Robert Aramayo, Benjamin Walker, Daniel Weyman, Ciaran Hinds, Markella Kavenagh, Megan Richards, and Charles Edwards (all members of the 23 actor list that we currently have at this article, except for Hinds who was announced as a new recurring cast member for S2). There is then a series of names that are grouped together, like with supporting characters in a film: Jack Lowden, Ben Daniels, Sam Hazeldine, Nicholas Woodeson, Geoff Morrell, and Amelia Kenworthy (also in order of appearance and all announced as new recurring cast members for S2 except for Lowden, as mentioned, and Morrell who returned for the episode from S1). Finally there is the actual cast list which includes all the other actors in the episode, in order of appearance, including Zates Atour who is one of the new recurring cast members.
2408:
and then an additional cast list that includes some noteworthy actors but not many. It may make sense to use an approach similar to WP:MCUTVCAST where we treat those with single billing as series regulars, those in the grouped section as guest stars, and those in the end credits list as co-stars who would only be included if found noteworthy by reliable sources. The main thing making me hesitate is that the cast members who Amazon announced as "recurring" are spread throughout all three groups, plus some of the 23 actors that we have in this article are included in the supporting list for S2 rather than the main. I am also concerned about applying the typical TV terms of "Main", "Recurring", and "Guest" where they are not supported by the series or reliable sources. But I do think a change could be warranted.
1590:
enough to justify not mentioning the incredible uproar generated in the public, not even once, not with even a single word. And it is well known Amazon is not a stranger to using tricks such as this. There MUST be at the very least a passing reference to the massive negative reactions by the audience. Not in some other article which the reader is very unlikely to visit, but exactly here. I can't for the life of me find another explanation for such a vehement refusal to mention it. Why would the editors care so much in this particular case if they didn't have a personal stake in it. What is happening here is horrible.
2330:, we would expect to see: a list of main/starring/series regular cast members from all seasons at this article; those from the first season at the S1 article along with any recurring or otherwise noteworthy guest stars from those episodes; the same at the S2 article; and the cast list in the infobox of each episode article would have a list of the guest stars from that episode. However, this series does not credit any actors as main/guest/co-star/etc. A similar situation has happened with the MCU shows on Disney+ and a unique approach was decided on for those articles that is detailed at
2377:: The full cast list for each episode, minus any minor background characters that do not have a name (i.e. "X as a Southlander", "X as a warrior Orc"), are listed in the infobox of each episode article in order of appearance per the credits. The S1 article lists all 38 of the officially announced cast members plus Ken Blackburn—the one actor in the season not announced by Amazon who plays a character from Tolkien's lore—in order of appearance per the credits. This article lists all 23 cast members from the
305:
828:
801:
931:
838:
267:
943:
723:
1280:, if someone is coming to a "Reception" section about a show about a subject with a pretty strong following on a WP article , it is likely that they are also a fan of that subject and the opinion of fans would matter a lot to them . It not being mentioned at all is dumb (which is probably why this has been mentioned lots of times in this talk page but has been refused by the same group of experienced editors each time)
527:
475:
590:
569:
1527:
235:
1007:
983:
713:
692:
433:
489:
464:
2403:: As the new cast members were announced for S2, I expected that we would use the same approach as with S1: list the full episode cast list at each episode article, list all the pre-announced cast members (plus those returning from S1) at the S2 article, and only update the list at this article if we get something definitive along the lines of the
326:
1793:. If you wish to ask a specific question on a topic, Knowledge (XXG) has a Reference desk; questions should be asked there rather than on talk pages. However, these should be used for questions of reasonable academic interest; Knowledge (XXG) does not serve as a technical help line or customer support for products or companies that have articles.
1797:
You are not being censored. That's not what censorship means. You're agreeing to use a platform, then after failing to follow the guidelines of the platform and facing the consequences, you get mad. You are absolutely correct in saying this article is NPOV (neutral point of view), so I don't see what
1721:
I do want to work on
Knowledge (XXG), but I will not shill for either side. Currently it is pretty obvious that there are parts of WikiEN that are not neutral and censoring any discord with a wall off Wiki-rules that are not or only partly applicable while mantraing themselves into believing they are
1360:
I've seen on wikipedia pages on other movies/shows where the audience score from both metacritic and rotten tomateos are shown under veiwership and review topics. However only showing the critic reviews for the Rings of Power implies that the show is generally seen as favorable even though their is a
2407:
article and characters posters for S1 (so far we have not). And that is what has been done currently. However, the change in onscreen credits for S2 is making me think that we need to reconsider this approach, because it certainly appears that there is a main billing list, a supporting billing list,
2319:
Hi all, I have been thinking about whether we need to change our approach to the cast lists for this series since the second season started airing with some differences in how actors are credited compared to the first season. I thought it best to write out everything I have been considering and post
2202:
This is not a forum, correct, addressing problematic behaviours like "protecting" readers from factually and multi sourced information, just because you don't agree with the person who wrote it is a problem deeply rooted in
Knowledge (XXG). Classic journalism is onesided and loosing relevancy fast -
1589:
Reading the page itself and the discussion segments here, it doesn't seem impossible to me that Amazon might've payed the editors or made a "donation" to
Knowledge (XXG) so that the data on incredibly negative reactions of the viewership wouldn't be mentioned. None of the arguments stated are strong
1816:
I accept that my first comment was deleted, as that was indeed political. The rest of this thing is on you, though. Proving my point along the way. I know that you will not agree with me, decades of indoctrination do that to people and I know that you can't help yourself as you won't even recognize
1340:
Now that season 2 has debuted and we have early reception information for it, I have had a go at better summarising the reception to both seasons in this article. Yes, including adding a very brief audience response section. The intention is still for all of the details to be at the season articles
2180:
FlightTime is certainly right that it could be taken to ANI, but I tend to be of the "starve them of oxygen" school of thought. Let people rant on the talk page and they tend to tire themselves out. So, personally I don't think any action is really needed, but I also recognize that I am far more
1714:
Yes, I currently am not interessted in sourcing changes to NPOV-articles because you will reject well researched and sourced articles because you say they were published on the wrong news site while simultaniously repeating the same few sites that circle reference each other without any sources as
2271:
Of course I won't have a consensus. You (not you personally - editors and administrators) have vetted the system for years to make sure that won't happen. There is a reason most simply abandoned editing. Changes were proposed for years to change it more towards the actual center, but they all get
1171:
To quote the rule: "Review aggregation websites such as Rotten
Tomatoes or Metacritic are citable for data pertaining to the ratio of positive to negative reviews;" While it is correct, that we shouldnt mention the user reviews by these rules, it is not impossible to mention the contrast to these
2428:
The S2 article would have three cast lists: "Starring", which covers the cast members who get single billing; "Supporting", which covers the cast members who get grouped billing; and "Other" (open to alternative suggestions for this heading), which includes any of the end credits actors that are
2215:
At least you try to refrain from suppresing measures and I commend you for that, albeit I know that will not impress you in the slightest. If I really am wrong and am only a "small minority" your "starving of oxygen" approach is indeed the most viable. I don't think I'm in the "small minority",
1957:
Then, were can we have an actual discussion about this topic that will not get shot down on the grounds of irrelevancy and/or convoluted conspiracy theory accusations, because you think this "accusations" are so outright ridicoulus that every second spent thinking about them is a waste of time?
1445:
Is there a discussion about film and television genres that led to you unlinking some of them but not others? It seems quite odd to me that you would do it at all, but also so inconsistently. Is the action genre more common a term than drama? And you unlinked fantasy in the lead but not in the
1885:
Most of the persons still editing here truly believe that they are in possesion of "the truth" and that they are doing the only right thing and everybody who thinks differently must be educated until they inevitably see the light, as their different opinion is simply based on missing
2022:
Now that the second season of the Rings of Power has begun airing, I wonder if the main image of this page should be changed to the title card as it currently appears. I suggest this be done if only due to the fact that the newer title is much better looking than the previous one.
2256:
I have made a submission at ANI. Thanks all. I hoped the oxygen approach would work because I like to save my time and breath for editors willing to communicate and uphold WP policy, and I simply can't stand this show (the second season is so far worse than the first for me).
1784:
Stay on the task of creating an encyclopedia. You can chat with people about
Knowledge (XXG)-related topics on their user talk pages, and should resolve problems with articles on the relevant talk pages, but do not take discussion into articles. In addition, bear in mind that
2195:
StingRay: Yes, because I'm just a stupid IP you haven't even addressed me personally once and at first not hid, but undid anything I wrote. There is a reason I am not using my account when commenting on topics like this, exactly because of the actions you showed in this
1251:
We should at some point, though it is tricky to cut down on what we have while maintaining all the points being made there. It may be easier to discuss this article in a month or two when the second season is out and we can compare the responses to both seasons. -
2356:
article but the poster for his character is not labeled on the press site like all the others, presumably because he left the series before the first season was released and has since been recast for the second season. 38 cast members, including those 23 in the
1341:
and for this article to just give a high-level summary of both. Hopefully this satisfies the editors who have been asking for such a section to be added. If there are any concerns about the latest change then I am happy to continue the discussion here. Thanks,
2340:: Each episode has one cast list in the end credits that lists all of the episode's actors in order of appearance. The showrunners have mentioned in interviews that there are 22 series regulars in the season, but no actors are credited as such onscreen.
1078:. You can state your case here, and we can discuss how to properly include the information you are wanting to include. Please consider reading through the blue links under "Frequently asked questions" at the top of this page before doing so. Thanks.
153:
2272:
denied. They simply gave up and left. That is not a win. You won't see tries to change the article, because anyone who actually wants to get the POV out will swiftly be dealt with. As
Stingray here proves by opening an ANI as expected.
2238:, etc.). I don't think you currently have a consensus for your changes, so you would not be entitled to change the article -- which hasn't been a problem I have seen. If you're able to gain consensus, then you obviously
1812:
Sorry, I misused NPOV and POV, of course this article (as any other on current day misfires like The
Acolyte) is highly POV. My first answer however did directly address the claim that you, dumuzuid and adamstom are paid
2471:
as a season example). That series had a large main cast list credited in the opening credits, though certain episodes had single, "featured" guests credited there, so the articles here have been formatted as such. -
1669:
Galadriel said it best: “Instead of a Dark Lord, you would have a queen, not dark but beautiful and terrible as the dawn! Tempestuous as the sea, and stronger than the foundations of the earth! All shall love me and
1194:
do not include user ratings submitted to websites such as the
Internet Movie Database, Metacritic, or Rotten Tomatoes (including its "Audience Says" feature), as they are vulnerable to vote stacking and demographic
1665:
Deleting facts is the political statement. But I haven't expected anything less. There is a reason why I don't even try to edit articles like this one. Amazon didn't pay the authors - that much can be assumed as a
1442:
Re-posting my questions from your talk page, though I'm not sure why you refused to answer there. This is about your actions as they relate to television articles in general rather than this article specifically.
1102:
The review aggregator website Rotten
Tomatoes reported a Score of 83% approval by critics for the first season based on 489 reviews in contrast to the Audience score of more than 25.000 ratings and a score of 38%
2042:, we don't usually update the image each time the series' credits change. The article needs to reflect the whole history of the show and at the moment the new title card has only been used in two episodes. -
956:
811:
1879:
We had the "superfans" event of streamers on
Youtube who were paid to promote the show and never showed any interest in Tolkien before or ever since. Those were paid, but not the authors of Knowledge (XXG).
44:
1630:
That is like describing the tip of an iceberg with not mentioning that this only resembles less than a seventh of the whole thing, and furthermore it is not dangerous because it is not in a shipping lane.
1673:
The difference between her and people like the ones who try to delete any wrongthink is, that she was acutely aware that tyranny is always bad, especially if you think you are doing the right thing.
2425:
The S1 article would have two cast lists: "Starring", which covers the 22 cast members; and "Supporting", which includes all the other pre-announced cast members plus actors who recur in 3+ episodes
2242:
entitled to make those changes, and even if I think they're for the worse, I'd be fine with them. You've failed to persuade me thus far, but that doesn't mean you won't sway others. Best of luck.
147:
1940:
Indeed. The very deepest of conspiracies on the page of...*checks notes*-- a middling Lord of the Rings fanfiction series. That totally checks out and is not a figment of anyone's imagination.
1096:
Right now this area is only stating the professional critics view and not the audience critic view on the same website about the same show. There we have over 25.000+ ratings with a score of 38%.
2432:
The actors listed at this article would be removed from the infobox of each episode article just as a series regular is not expected to be in the infobox for a traditional show's episode article
2276:
2217:
1959:
1927:
1890:
1859:
1821:
1766:
1723:
1698:
1674:
1632:
1627:
Have you actually read that section? There is a mention that "some parts" of the viewership didn't like it, directly followed by relativations of why thos parts can be dismissed as irrelevant.
1113:
2135:, what needs to be done about the IP user above? I feel like they have been given substantially more grace beyond the recommended process and have failed to escape violations of WP:NOTFORUM.
1762:
This article is hihly NPOV because the sources that are allowed are highly NPOV, petition for other sources will get shot down because the people controlling the sources list are highly NPOV.
2087:
I just want to mildly protest that there's really no policy reason why the main image couldn't be changed to reflect the new season--but, as you say, it would require a consensus. Cheers.
1043:
2573:
2209:
I fully expect for you to force the deletion of my very reservedly toned answer because you don't like what it says. Go ahead, you will only proof anything I wrote to be factually correct.
1917:
Agreed. Only problem is that there is ample empirical evidence for my claim. Obviously not on Knowledge (XXG) itself. But it exists, not least by the cofounder of Knowledge (XXG) himself.
1023:
868:
2073:
Unfortunately, we don't make decisions based on what enjoyers of the show would rather have. You either need better reasoning for this change or a lot more support from other editors. -
1889:
So no, there are no evil intentions behind the state of this article. Good will and absolute conviction are sufficent as an explanation. Occam's and Hanlon's razors are your friend. ;)
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
1996:
1446:
infobox? If there hasn't been a discussion about this and you are expecting to make similar edits to other television articles then I think this is something that should be raised at
1178:
The review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes reported a Score of 83% approval by critics for the first season based on 489 reviews in strong contrast to the negative Audience score.
500:. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
1219:
is that they are not reliable. What we can do is include commentary from reliable sources discussing the audience score if they think it is noteworthy, which we do already have at
2348:
from just before the season was released has a list of 23 cast members which line up with the 23 character posters that were released for the season. Those posters can be seen on
1954:
I agree with you that Rings of Power is not the place that this should be discussed. I'm rather shocked that it wasn't deleted. I honestly expected an admin to kill it ourtight.
885:
2583:
2230:
I don't feel "above" you in any way, shape, or form. I just believe in Knowledge (XXG) and decision making by consensus. You're entitled to say whatever you like (subject to
961:
390:. On Knowledge (XXG), primary sources can be used to make straightforward statements of fact. To further analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize primary material, reliable
2334:. It relies on the fact that some actors are credited in the main titles sequence and equates those to starring cast members and all other actors to traditional guest stars.
2151:
1038:
1033:
2388:
1992:
1606:
1220:
309:
284:
1376:
Other Knowledge (XXG) articles using user scores are incorrect and not an example for us to follow here. The FAQs at the top of this page cover why we do not use them. -
1028:
226:
2212:
And to Dumuzid: Your answer is a textbook example of what I wrote up there, you feel so above this lowly "disruptor" that you think ignoring it is the correct approach.
1058:
921:
2588:
2598:
1053:
644:
2280:
2221:
1894:
1863:
1825:
1770:
1727:
1702:
1678:
1636:
1117:
1048:
673:
2568:
2528:
1697:
Tolkien's lessons are more important than ever, and the persons who actually need to learn them are putting their fingers in their ears and sing childrens songs.
911:
875:
783:
501:
496:
469:
2578:
2059:
But I, and I'm sure many other enjoyers of the show, would much rather have the newer title card be representative of the entire show than the one used in S1.
1882:
This article is obviously POV, because the allowed sources are POV - why is a story with years in the making, and changing that fact is by now nigh impossible.
657:
79:
2199:
Is anything I wrote up there factually untrue? ARE you paid by Amazon? Or are you feeling personally attacked because what I wrote hits the nail on the head?
2341:
1295:
In the meantime there is a pretty obvious "Reception of season 1" link that takes readers directly to all the details. We aren't trying to hide anything. -
2593:
2553:
2495:, since it seems structured, logical, and provides for each system, separating them appropriately. there is probably no catch-all sysetm for both season 1
773:
1926:
Does it make my claims unrefutably true? Of course not. But the knee-jerk reaction of certain editors should make you at least raise your eyebrows a bit.
1844:
It will never cease to amaze me that the articles for which I receive the most vituperation are the things I care about the absolute least. Cheers, all.
1237:
Why not summarize that section in a "Season 1 reception" here with a {Main article} link to that? Especially as the show doesn't have a second season yet
880:
168:
1197:
If you can find this sort of thing mentioned in a reliable source, then possibly. But as written I would object to your sentence as being too close to
610:
135:
2543:
634:
24:
2558:
1215:
We can't just say that the audience score is negative as that implies that we think it is a reliable measure of the series' audience. The point of
745:
85:
2563:
1396:
FYI for those watching this page, I have started move discussions for some of the episode articles that you may be interested in contributing to:
2446:
I am hoping to get opinions on whether others feel a change is unnecessary, my new proposal is the way to go, or some other alternative. Thanks,
749:
2461:
I'm not a watcher of this series, but everything you laid out sound reasonable to consider. Sounds like you want to take an approach similar to
660:
that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material
851:
806:
1192:
I think in context the bit you quote above is about the ratio of positive critical reviews to negative. Later in the section, it also says:
129:
2203:
as long as Knowledge (XXG) doesn't address this and allows other forms of sources as long as they are proofable it will loose relevancy too.
597:
574:
2548:
1820:
If you want to "hide" this exchange, go ahead. I will answer the OP directly once again, though. Respectfully keep your hands of that one.
30:
2349:
1999:
that could impact this article. The intention is to come to a consensus on the wording for Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic data across the
1787:
article talk pages exist solely to discuss how to improve articles; they are not for general discussion about the subject of the article
1591:
125:
736:
697:
2394:
1904:
1555:
1504:
863:
1963:
1931:
1313:"It not being mentioned at all is dumb" - what about the "See also: Reception of season 1" link right below the Reception header? --
99:
2538:
2533:
2391:
2368:
175:
104:
20:
2362:
1554:
In the Cast section, a photo is incorrectly associated to Cynthia Addai-Robinson when it is actually a photo of Nazanin Boniadi.
859:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
74:
551:
993:
444:
275:
1471:
Hey, I just ran a script and after all these years you're the fist one to have issues with the outcome. Have it your way. -
65:
2440:. The S2 section is based on the credits through episode 204 and will likely expand as the rest of the season is released.
474:
2523:
2429:
found noteworthy either by being in the pre-season announcements, playing a Tolkien character, or recurring in 3+ episodes
2371:. Some of those actors only have small roles in the first episode but others have recurring roles throughout the season.
141:
2206:
You may say: "If you disagree don't edit", but I don't want Knowledge (XXG) to die, I want it to face reality and adapt.
1765:
There is a reason why Galadriels rejection of the one ring is a really good analogy to your usage of Knowledge (XXG)...
2504:
2289:
Well, I am sure no one will use the site you describe and will instead find superior alternatives. Have a good one.
2365:
280:
234:
185:
1533:
1013:
989:
109:
1400:
1107:
245:
1718:
Some of them being downsized to 4 employees, all of them well sourced activists, yet their articles are gospel.
1285:
1242:
450:
1858:
Yeah, adam, of course you will set this one. At least you didn't delete it this time. But you hid to much ;)
1595:
2500:
1908:
1559:
1508:
2508:
2481:
2455:
2414:: I think this balances the different crediting styles of each season and what our reliable sources cover.
2298:
2284:
2266:
2251:
2225:
2190:
2175:
2144:
2110:
2096:
2082:
2068:
2051:
2032:
2012:
1967:
1949:
1935:
1912:
1898:
1867:
1853:
1829:
1807:
1774:
1745:
1731:
1706:
1682:
1640:
1622:
1599:
1578:
1563:
1512:
1492:
1465:
1425:
1385:
1370:
1350:
1329:
1304:
1289:
1261:
1246:
1232:
1210:
1187:
1163:
1138:
1121:
1087:
2106:
2064:
2028:
1609:. A discussion about whether/how to summarise those details at this article can already be found above at
606:
413:
to different sides of an argument. In any case, material presented in an article needs to be supported by
2331:
1920:
1753:
I will, however, not stand by while a TALK page for an at least highly controversial topic gets censored.
1310:
1281:
1238:
391:
368:
55:
2477:
2463:
2451:
2216:
though. There is a reason this topic comes up again and again. Only time will tell on this one, though.
2078:
2047:
2008:
1618:
1574:
1461:
1421:
1381:
1346:
1300:
1257:
1228:
2422:
article minus Mawle) plus Hinds, Peter Mullan, and any other cast member that gets single billing in S2
2235:
2102:
2060:
2024:
1779:
1688:
1654:
1366:
70:
1922:
371:
writing with minimal editorial oversight are not considered to be reliable sources on Knowledge (XXG).
2262:
2165:
2140:
1803:
1482:
1083:
843:
249:
1447:
1179:
1144:
432:
387:
1756:
If you think I'm wrong, give me a qualified answer. If you think I'm not worth your time ignore me.
1356:
Why show user scores on other content and explaining the discrepancy and not on the rings of power?
1183:
545:
161:
1362:
2468:
250:
1216:
1198:
827:
800:
349:
2294:
2247:
2186:
2092:
1945:
1849:
1759:
But never try to unceremoniously censor observable facts because they are inconvenient to you.
1741:
1694:
If you disagree state why (I know you do) but stop thinking that only you knows what is right.
1323:
1206:
1157:
1134:
948:
728:
51:
2418:
This article would list the 22 cast members credited on Amazon's press site (all 23 from the
1918:
406:
2473:
2447:
2128:
2074:
2043:
2004:
1614:
1570:
1457:
1417:
1377:
1342:
1296:
1253:
1224:
377:
247:
2231:
1277:
410:
2258:
2156:
2136:
1799:
1473:
1437:
1126:
1079:
741:
602:
340:
2275:
Well, let's meet under a new IP and hopefully changed conditions sometime in the future.
1791:
Material unsuitable for talk pages may be subject to removal per the talk page guidelines
1750:
Oh, I would have after the first comment and I will still do. Thanks for your concern. ;)
414:
930:
2387:: Firstly, Amazon officially announced 18 new "recurring" cast members for the season,
2154:
and have the IP blocked from this page as continued disruption and drama mongering. -
541:
2361:
article, were officially announced by Amazon during the casting process for the show:
2517:
1405:
1108:
https://en.wikipedia.org/The_Lord_of_the_Rings:_The_Rings_of_Power_season_1#Reception
856:
1817:
that you are indoctrinated. You truly believe what you are doing is the right thing.
942:
722:
2290:
2243:
2182:
2132:
2088:
1941:
1845:
1737:
1314:
1202:
1148:
1130:
1605:
The "missing" information you are talking about is discussed, in great detail, at
1410:
330:
To view the response to a question, click the link to the right of the question.
2039:
1075:
744:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
1789:, nor are they a help desk for obtaining instructions or technical assistance.
988:
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the
740:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge (XXG) articles about
2327:
938:
833:
718:
526:
2320:
it all here to see if anyone else has any opinions on the best way forward.
1012:
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
855:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
589:
568:
1997:
Talk:The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power season 2#Reception wording
613:
for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.
325:
1876:
I see how you are coming to this conclusion, but I think you are wrong.
712:
691:
1451:
358:
2436:
I have mocked-up what the new lists at the season articles would be
1610:
1221:
The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power season 1#Audience response
488:
463:
1691:. He accuses you of being a paid shill. I say he is wrong and why.
304:
336:
1521:
1001:
977:
426:
294:
261:
251:
15:
1569:
I have notified the uploader about making this correction. -
352:
are not considered to be reliable sources on Knowledge (XXG).
929:
676:
for more information about this and other article standards.
525:
399:
Q4: Why does the article not reflect my opinion of the show?
357:
Q2: Why does this article not include critical reviews from
335:
Q1: Why does this article not include audience scores from
1736:
Maybe take a break and enjoy a frozen treat or something?
1093:
well, let me bring some consensus possibilities to weight.
2352:
under 'Key Art'; note that Joseph Mawle is listed in the
1503:
That is not Cynthia Adai-Robinson, it's Nazanin Boniadi.
2437:
536:
315:
1711:
And now TNStingRay butts in with his personal opinion.
1401:
Talk:A Shadow of the Past#Requested move 8 August 2024
160:
2375:
The current approach, developed for the first season
2181:
passive than most in situations like this. Cheers.
174:
1993:The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power season 2
1991:For anyone watching this page who is not watching
1607:The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power season 1
674:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards
2499:2, so this is the best proposal for this so far.
1454:so there is some consensus on how to go about it.
510:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Articles for creation
2574:B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
2381:article in order of appearance per the credits.
1611:#Opportunity for User:Skcin7 to state their case
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1070:Opportunity for User:Skcin7 to state their case
748:. To improve this article, please refer to the
601:, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to
1518:Semi-protected edit request on 28 August 2024
8:
1798:the problem is since we all agree with you.
2584:Low-importance American television articles
279:. Please read recent comments, look in the
2599:Pages in the Knowledge (XXG) Top 25 Report
1648:
1406:Talk:Partings#Requested move 8 August 2024
795:
686:
563:
513:Template:WikiProject Articles for creation
494:This article was reviewed by member(s) of
458:
1019:times. The weeks in which this happened:
896:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
25:The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power
619:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Middle-earth
2589:American television task force articles
2385:Crediting details for the second season
2326:: Usually for television articles, per
797:
688:
609:, and related topics. Please visit the
565:
460:
430:
2338:Crediting details for the first season
1783:
1444:
1411:Talk:Udûn#Requested move 8 August 2024
1193:
758:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Television
666:the current action must be written in
409:, Knowledge (XXG) attempts to provide
2569:Low-importance United States articles
2529:AfC submissions by date/26 April 2020
2277:2A02:908:190:AF80:B8E7:D520:8BCA:5333
2218:2A02:908:190:AF80:B8E7:D520:8BCA:5333
1995:, there is currently a discussion at
1960:2A02:908:190:AF80:B172:5C1B:315F:F4D5
1928:2A02:908:190:AF80:B172:5C1B:315F:F4D5
1891:2A02:908:190:AF80:F959:9137:2A15:A2DA
1860:2A02:908:190:AF80:F959:9137:2A15:A2DA
1822:2A02:908:190:AF80:F959:9137:2A15:A2DA
1767:2A02:908:190:AF80:F959:9137:2A15:A2DA
1724:2A02:908:190:AF80:F959:9137:2A15:A2DA
1699:2A02:908:190:AF80:F959:9137:2A15:A2DA
1675:2A02:908:190:AF80:F959:9137:2A15:A2DA
1633:2A02:908:190:AF80:B8E7:D520:8BCA:5333
1172:public user views to the prof. score.
1114:2003:DF:A72F:9F00:C11B:2E24:1152:C660
7:
2579:B-Class American television articles
996:, when it received 11,639,471 views.
849:This article is within the scope of
734:This article is within the scope of
595:This article is within the scope of
449:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
2594:WikiProject United States articles
2554:Mid-importance television articles
2401:Reconsidering the current approach
1499:Incorrect name associated to photo
899:Template:WikiProject United States
386:Tolkien's writings are considered
14:
622:Template:WikiProject Middle-earth
497:WikiProject Articles for creation
276:previous arguments being restated
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
2544:High-importance Tolkien articles
1585:A possible conflict of interest?
1525:
1005:
981:
941:
836:
826:
799:
721:
711:
690:
658:Guide to writing better articles
588:
567:
487:
473:
462:
431:
380:'s writings considered a source?
324:
303:
265:
233:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
2559:WikiProject Television articles
1044:September 25 to October 1, 2022
916:This article has been rated as
778:This article has been rated as
761:Template:WikiProject Television
639:This article has been rated as
534:This article was accepted from
2564:B-Class United States articles
2111:16:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2097:23:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
2083:06:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
2069:06:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1361:clear divide between the two.
1024:August 28 to September 3, 2022
992:annual list. This happened in
982:
957:American television task force
1:
2509:15:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
2482:16:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
2456:13:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
2299:16:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2285:15:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2267:15:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2252:15:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2226:15:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2191:14:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2176:13:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2145:12:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2052:06:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
2033:04:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
2013:18:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
1968:15:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1950:13:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1936:11:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1913:07:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
1903:Don't forget Hitchen's razor.
1899:18:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1868:23:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1854:19:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1830:18:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1808:18:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1775:17:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1746:17:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1732:16:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1707:15:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1683:12:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1641:10:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
1351:16:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
954:This article is supported by
540:on 26 April 2020 by reviewer
42:Put new text under old text.
2549:B-Class television articles
2412:Proposal for a new approach
1623:12:58, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
1600:12:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
1579:18:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
1564:17:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
1548:to reactivate your request.
1536:has been answered. Set the
1513:17:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
1493:21:49, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
1466:21:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
2615:
2315:Approach to the cast lists
1426:12:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
1330:21:16, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1305:13:40, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1290:13:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1262:13:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1247:10:08, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1175:Maybe it could be written:
1099:Maybe it could be written:
922:project's importance scale
784:project's importance scale
645:project's importance scale
320:Frequently asked questions
1987:Critical response wording
1687:adamstom97, stop abusing
1386:22:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
1371:22:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
1233:05:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
1211:02:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
1188:02:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
937:
915:
852:WikiProject United States
821:
777:
706:
651:
638:
583:
533:
482:
457:
272:Discussions on this page
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
2539:B-Class Tolkien articles
2534:Accepted AfC submissions
2018:To Change the Main Image
1164:07:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
1139:03:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
1122:02:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
1088:00:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
1039:September 18 to 24, 2022
1034:September 11 to 17, 2022
857:United States of America
656:Though it states in the
598:WikiProject Middle-earth
1392:Potential episode moves
1029:September 4 to 10, 2022
1059:October 16 to 22, 2022
934:
902:United States articles
737:WikiProject Television
530:
439:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1054:October 9 to 15, 2022
933:
752:for the type of work.
529:
507:Articles for creation
504:for more information.
470:Articles for creation
443:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
407:neutral point of view
350:User-generated scores
227:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
2524:B-Class AfC articles
2324:Some general context
1049:October 2 to 8, 2022
844:United States portal
105:No original research
2350:Amazon's press site
1278:Ignoring all policy
870:Articles Requested!
764:television articles
746:join the discussion
742:television programs
2489:Support adamstom97
2469:The Crown season 2
1168:Thx for this link.
935:
531:
445:content assessment
287:before commenting.
278:
86:dispute resolution
47:
2501:YodaYogaYogurt154
2173:
1983:
1982:
1552:
1551:
1490:
1067:
1066:
1000:
999:
976:
975:
972:
971:
968:
967:
949:Television portal
794:
793:
790:
789:
729:Television portal
685:
684:
681:
680:
677:
611:project talk page
562:
561:
558:
557:
425:
424:
392:secondary sources
318:
291:
290:
283:, and review the
273:
258:
257:
66:Assume good faith
43:
2606:
2492:
2174:
2170:
2163:
2161:
1649:
1543:
1539:
1529:
1528:
1522:
1491:
1487:
1480:
1478:
1441:
1326:
1320:
1317:
1160:
1154:
1151:
1009:
1008:
1002:
985:
984:
978:
951:
946:
945:
904:
903:
900:
897:
894:
846:
841:
840:
839:
830:
823:
822:
817:
814:
803:
796:
766:
765:
762:
759:
756:
750:style guidelines
731:
726:
725:
715:
708:
707:
702:
694:
687:
652:
627:
626:
625:Tolkien articles
623:
620:
617:
603:J. R. R. Tolkien
592:
585:
584:
579:
571:
564:
539:
518:
517:
514:
511:
508:
491:
484:
483:
478:
477:
476:
466:
459:
442:
436:
435:
427:
415:reliable sources
378:J. R. R. Tolkien
328:
308:
307:
295:
269:
268:
262:
252:
238:
237:
228:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
2614:
2613:
2609:
2608:
2607:
2605:
2604:
2603:
2514:
2513:
2490:
2317:
2166:
2157:
2155:
2125:
2123:2A02 IP address
2020:
1989:
1984:
1722:the good guys.
1715:the holy truth.
1658:
1587:
1541:
1537:
1526:
1520:
1501:
1483:
1474:
1472:
1435:
1433:
1394:
1358:
1338:
1328:
1324:
1318:
1315:
1162:
1158:
1152:
1149:
1127:MOS:TVRECEPTION
1072:
1063:
1006:
947:
940:
901:
898:
895:
892:
891:
890:
876:Become a Member
842:
837:
835:
815:
809:
763:
760:
757:
754:
753:
727:
720:
700:
641:High-importance
624:
621:
618:
615:
614:
578:High‑importance
577:
535:
515:
512:
509:
506:
505:
472:
440:
421:
420:
419:
418:
400:
396:
395:
388:primary sources
381:
373:
372:
362:
354:
353:
344:
341:Rotten Tomatoes
321:
319:
266:
254:
253:
248:
225:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
2612:
2610:
2602:
2601:
2596:
2591:
2586:
2581:
2576:
2571:
2566:
2561:
2556:
2551:
2546:
2541:
2536:
2531:
2526:
2516:
2515:
2512:
2511:
2485:
2484:
2434:
2433:
2430:
2426:
2423:
2316:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2273:
2269:
2213:
2210:
2207:
2204:
2200:
2197:
2124:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2099:
2057:
2019:
2016:
2001:Rings of Power
1988:
1985:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1955:
1924:
1887:
1883:
1880:
1877:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1856:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1818:
1814:
1795:
1763:
1760:
1757:
1754:
1751:
1719:
1716:
1712:
1695:
1692:
1671:
1667:
1660:
1659:
1652:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1628:
1586:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1550:
1549:
1530:
1519:
1516:
1500:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1432:
1429:
1414:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1393:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1357:
1354:
1337:
1336:September 2024
1334:
1333:
1332:
1322:
1311:AlexBobCharles
1307:
1282:AlexBobCharles
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1239:AlexBobCharles
1213:
1176:
1173:
1169:
1166:
1156:
1110:
1104:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1071:
1068:
1065:
1064:
1062:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1036:
1031:
1026:
1020:
1010:
998:
997:
986:
974:
973:
970:
969:
966:
965:
962:Low-importance
953:
952:
936:
926:
925:
918:Low-importance
914:
908:
907:
905:
889:
888:
883:
878:
873:
866:
864:Template Usage
860:
848:
847:
831:
819:
818:
816:Low‑importance
804:
792:
791:
788:
787:
780:Mid-importance
776:
770:
769:
767:
733:
732:
716:
704:
703:
701:Mid‑importance
695:
683:
682:
679:
678:
649:
648:
637:
631:
630:
628:
593:
581:
580:
572:
560:
559:
556:
555:
532:
522:
521:
519:
492:
480:
479:
467:
455:
454:
448:
437:
423:
422:
405:To maintain a
401:
398:
397:
382:
375:
374:
363:
356:
355:
345:
334:
333:
322:
302:
301:
300:
298:
289:
288:
274:often lead to
270:
256:
255:
246:
244:
243:
240:
239:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2611:
2600:
2597:
2595:
2592:
2590:
2587:
2585:
2582:
2580:
2577:
2575:
2572:
2570:
2567:
2565:
2562:
2560:
2557:
2555:
2552:
2550:
2547:
2545:
2542:
2540:
2537:
2535:
2532:
2530:
2527:
2525:
2522:
2521:
2519:
2510:
2506:
2502:
2498:
2494:
2487:
2486:
2483:
2479:
2475:
2470:
2466:
2465:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2441:
2439:
2438:in my sandbox
2431:
2427:
2424:
2421:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2413:
2409:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2396:
2393:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2380:
2376:
2372:
2370:
2367:
2364:
2360:
2355:
2351:
2347:
2345:
2339:
2335:
2333:
2329:
2325:
2321:
2314:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2282:
2278:
2274:
2270:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2255:
2254:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2214:
2211:
2208:
2205:
2201:
2198:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2171:
2169:
2162:
2160:
2153:
2150:Take this to
2149:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2122:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2101:Fair enough.
2100:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2017:
2015:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1986:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1956:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1923:
1921:
1919:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1881:
1878:
1875:
1874:
1869:
1865:
1861:
1857:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1796:
1794:
1792:
1788:
1781:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1761:
1758:
1755:
1752:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1720:
1717:
1713:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1693:
1690:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1656:
1651:
1650:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1629:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1592:79.106.135.10
1584:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1547:
1544:parameter to
1535:
1531:
1524:
1523:
1517:
1515:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1498:
1494:
1488:
1486:
1479:
1477:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1453:
1449:
1439:
1430:
1428:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1355:
1353:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1321:
1312:
1308:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1174:
1170:
1167:
1165:
1161:
1155:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1098:
1095:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1069:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1014:Top 25 Report
1011:
1004:
1003:
995:
991:
990:Top 50 Report
987:
980:
979:
963:
960:(assessed as
959:
958:
950:
944:
939:
932:
928:
927:
923:
919:
913:
910:
909:
906:
893:United States
887:
884:
882:
879:
877:
874:
872:
871:
867:
865:
862:
861:
858:
854:
853:
845:
834:
832:
829:
825:
824:
820:
813:
808:
807:United States
805:
802:
798:
785:
781:
775:
772:
771:
768:
751:
747:
743:
739:
738:
730:
724:
719:
717:
714:
710:
709:
705:
699:
696:
693:
689:
675:
672:. Please see
671:
670:
665:
664:
659:
655:
650:
646:
642:
636:
633:
632:
629:
612:
608:
604:
600:
599:
594:
591:
587:
586:
582:
576:
573:
570:
566:
553:
550:
547:
543:
538:
528:
524:
523:
520:
503:
499:
498:
493:
490:
486:
485:
481:
471:
468:
465:
461:
456:
452:
446:
438:
434:
429:
428:
416:
412:
408:
404:
393:
389:
385:
379:
370:
366:
360:
351:
348:
342:
338:
332:
331:
327:
317:
314:
311:
306:
299:
297:
296:
293:
286:
282:
277:
271:
264:
263:
260:
242:
241:
236:
232:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
2496:
2488:
2462:
2443:
2442:
2435:
2419:
2411:
2410:
2404:
2400:
2399:
2384:
2383:
2378:
2374:
2373:
2358:
2353:
2343:
2337:
2336:
2332:WP:MCUTVCAST
2323:
2322:
2318:
2239:
2168:open channel
2167:
2158:
2126:
2103:Aatmik Dutta
2061:Aatmik Dutta
2025:Aatmik Dutta
2021:
2003:articles. -
2000:
1990:
1905:84.54.70.119
1790:
1786:
1588:
1556:70.54.83.220
1553:
1545:
1534:edit request
1505:70.54.83.220
1502:
1485:open channel
1484:
1475:
1434:
1415:
1395:
1359:
1339:
1276:
1073:
1016:
955:
917:
881:Project Talk
869:
850:
779:
735:
668:
667:
662:
661:
653:
640:
616:Middle-earth
596:
575:Middle-earth
548:
516:AfC articles
502:project page
495:
451:WikiProjects
402:
383:
369:contributors
364:
346:
329:
323:
312:
292:
259:
230:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
2474:Favre1fan93
2236:WP:NOTFORUM
2129:Adamstom.97
2040:MOS:TVIMAGE
1780:WP:NOTFORUM
1689:WP:NOTFORUM
1655:WP:NOTFORUM
1431:Genre links
1201:. Cheers.
1129:. Cheers.
607:legendarium
394:are needed.
148:free images
31:not a forum
2518:Categories
2448:adamstom97
2328:MOS:TVCAST
2259:TNstingray
2159:FlightTime
2137:TNstingray
2075:adamstom97
2044:adamstom97
2005:adamstom97
1886:knowledge.
1800:TNstingray
1657:discussion
1653:Off-topic
1615:adamstom97
1571:adamstom97
1538:|answered=
1476:FlightTime
1458:adamstom97
1438:FlightTime
1418:adamstom97
1378:adamstom97
1343:adamstom97
1297:adamstom97
1254:adamstom97
1225:adamstom97
1145:WP:USERGEN
1080:TNstingray
812:Television
755:Television
698:Television
669:past tense
537:this draft
411:due weight
2467:(see say
2464:The Crown
2444:Thoughts?
1670:despair!”
1180:ErikWar19
1106:same for
1103:approval.
542:Sulfurboy
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
2493:proposal
2420:Deadline
2405:Deadline
2379:Deadline
2359:Deadline
2354:Deadline
2344:Deadline
1416:Thanks,
1217:WP:USERG
1199:WP:SYNTH
552:contribs
376:Q3: Are
281:archives
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
2346:article
2291:Dumuzid
2244:Dumuzid
2196:thread.
2183:Dumuzid
2133:Dumuzid
2089:Dumuzid
1942:Dumuzid
1846:Dumuzid
1813:shills.
1738:Dumuzid
1363:Terps90
1203:Dumuzid
1131:Dumuzid
920:on the
782:on the
643:on the
441:B-class
367:Forbes
231:60Â days
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
2232:WP:NPA
2152:WP:ANI
2056:I see.
1666:given.
1452:MOS:TV
1076:Skcin7
886:Alerts
663:before
605:, his
447:scale.
359:Forbes
126:Google
2497:&
2342:This
1542:|ans=
1532:This
1448:WT:TV
1316:Alex_
1195:skew.
1150:Alex_
1147:. --
654:Note:
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
2505:talk
2478:talk
2452:talk
2295:talk
2281:talk
2263:talk
2248:talk
2222:talk
2187:talk
2141:talk
2107:talk
2093:talk
2079:talk
2065:talk
2048:talk
2038:Per
2029:talk
2009:talk
1964:talk
1946:talk
1932:talk
1909:talk
1895:talk
1864:talk
1850:talk
1826:talk
1804:talk
1771:talk
1742:talk
1728:talk
1703:talk
1679:talk
1637:talk
1619:talk
1613:. -
1596:talk
1575:talk
1560:talk
1509:talk
1462:talk
1422:talk
1382:talk
1367:talk
1347:talk
1325:TALK
1301:talk
1286:talk
1258:talk
1243:talk
1229:talk
1223:. -
1207:talk
1184:talk
1159:TALK
1143:And
1135:talk
1118:talk
1084:talk
994:2022
635:High
546:talk
339:and
337:IMDb
316:edit
310:view
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
2240:are
2131:, @
1540:or
1450:or
912:Low
774:Mid
403:A4:
384:A3:
365:A2:
347:A1:
285:FAQ
176:TWL
2520::
2507:)
2491:'s
2480:)
2454:)
2297:)
2283:)
2265:)
2250:)
2234:,
2224:)
2189:)
2143:)
2109:)
2095:)
2081:)
2067:)
2050:)
2031:)
2011:)
1966:)
1948:)
1934:)
1911:)
1897:)
1866:)
1852:)
1828:)
1806:)
1782:.
1773:)
1744:)
1730:)
1705:)
1681:)
1639:)
1621:)
1598:)
1577:)
1562:)
1546:no
1511:)
1464:)
1456:-
1424:)
1384:)
1369:)
1349:)
1319:21
1303:)
1288:)
1260:)
1245:)
1231:)
1209:)
1186:)
1153:21
1137:)
1120:)
1112:--
1086:)
964:).
810::
554:).
229::
221:,
217:,
213:,
209:,
205:,
201:,
197:,
193:,
156:)
54:;
2503:(
2476:(
2450:(
2395:3
2392:2
2389:1
2369:3
2366:2
2363:1
2293:(
2279:(
2261:(
2246:(
2220:(
2185:(
2172:)
2164:(
2139:(
2127:@
2105:(
2091:(
2077:(
2063:(
2046:(
2027:(
2007:(
1962:(
1944:(
1930:(
1907:(
1893:(
1862:(
1848:(
1824:(
1802:(
1769:(
1740:(
1726:(
1701:(
1677:(
1635:(
1617:(
1594:(
1573:(
1558:(
1507:(
1489:)
1481:(
1460:(
1440::
1436:@
1420:(
1380:(
1365:(
1345:(
1309:@
1299:(
1284:(
1256:(
1241:(
1227:(
1205:(
1182:(
1133:(
1116:(
1082:(
1074:@
1017:8
924:.
786:.
647:.
549:·
544:(
453::
417:.
361:?
343:?
313:·
223:9
219:8
215:7
211:6
207:5
203:4
199:3
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.