Knowledge

Talk:The Smeezingtons

Source đź“ť

1253:
need of support from a source (I read the source linked after it and the closest it came to that statement was "the production trio's services are increasingly in demand"; perhaps something more like that could be used). Secondly, the "Other ventures" and "Levcon studios" sections are both very short and the "Other ventures" mentions Levcon studios, so maybe they'd be better off merged together somehow, unless more info can be added to at least one of them. Thirdly, the "Formation and early works" section seems to me to be slightly confusing since it seems to not be in chronological order. I don't know the subject well enough to fix it, and maybe there's not really a problem, but I think it could do with just a little bit of a rewrite/shuffle around or something like that. Maybe I'm wrong.
1214:
of the article (as well as Bruno Mars' own article, which was much better but still subject to many flaws), and I've also made the style more consistent and formal by referring to people by their surnames rather than first names (previously it often used first names, which seems too familiar for me and also it changed from one system to the other which made it a little more confusing than was necessary). It took quite a while, but hopefully now the errors you were referring to are pretty much dealt with. However, I think that there is still quite a bit of work that needs to be done on this article. I do not understand how it could have been nominated for Good Article status in the state that I found it.
664: 652: 919: 898: 929: 1283:
they refused to move, however they still need to be merged. Secondly, you are right I will change the words in that paragraph it could be miss reading or people will miss interpret. I will see what I can do about that topic ("Formation and Early works"), the hardest part is select the info and you get mad sometimes when the internet is not responding. Thank you for contributing for wiki, I hope we have the chance to edit more articles together.
700: 826: 570: 805: 731: 543: 1249:
mistakes (small ones) and corrected them, but overall I realised that this is actually quite a good article and that it has a lot of value (I think earlier I'd gotten to the stage where I couldn't see the forest for the trees, so to speak). I've looked at the Good Article criteria again and I think that the article as it stands definitely seems to me to deserve it (however, I am now biased so I won't join in that discussion).
580: 190: 485: 361: 423: 392: 509: 409: 1407: 433: 1233:
several time to be reviewd and accepted as FA, GA, A...so there is a lot of time to correct them. When an article is submited it has always issues, so it's normal. You also mentioned that is work that needs to be done in this article. Could you specifie? (MarioSoulTruthFan 14:54, 28 October 2013 (UTC))
1232:
First of all, I agree with your opinion the article had several mistakes and I thank you for correcting them. Secondly, it is nominated due to the extensive work that has been done in the article, despite having grammar errors and "issues" with ponctuation, paragraphs, etc etc and these articles take
1064:
I completely agree. "In 2008, Lawrence was an under-appreciated Los Angeles artist" and "sitting in the car with no money in their pockets"...again, subtle but unacceptable abuse of a neutral medium for opinions and marketing talk...this is supposed to be an encyclopedia. Please someone place that
1213:
I noticed that as well. The paragraph about how Mars and Lawrence met was riddled with issues, as was the equivalent paragraph in Mars' own article (one must have been copied from the other). I've fixed (mostly, at least) that paragraph (in both pages), and I've also extensively copyedited the rest
1174:
Small point, but there are a large number of punctuation and grammatical errors in the article. I'm working from my iPad which makes it difficult to do the switching back and forth thing to cite specific instances. I like the content overall and arrived here because I think Bruno et al will be an
1282:
I see your frustration had it myself sinsce this article began with nothing and now has everything. Regarding the Other Ventures/ Levcon Studios I believe you are right and they should be merged. Once I found a source (can't find it anymore) saying that the label has offered them a new studio but
1127:
It seems like The Smeezingtons will be getting a lot of work in the next few years...why merge when we're going to probably need both articles eventually anyway? I mean, I'm not Nostradamus or anything but I'm thinking both articles will require major expansion as time goes on so it might be a bit
1484:
Those were others edits which helped the article, the latter you made it didn't. I didn't understand the use of release dates brokedown to the day it's pointless, plus no citations were used. On top of this, you changed the date the team was formed with no reliable source. Not only that but "Bang
1252:
I can only see three things that I feel could do with some more work. Firstly, as a different user mentioned, there should probably be a source for "They are currently one of the most sought-after production and writing teams in California" or that statement should be changed to something less in
1248:
Secondly, I think I should probably apologise; I had the wrong tone in my earlier comment. I had just spent quite a while looking very closely at the article and combing through it for the mistakes, and by the end of it I think I was a little frustrated. Upon reading it again today I did see more
1500:
Thanks for your reply, Mariosoultruthfan, and for letting me know the problems so I can fix them. I added date info but I didn't change any key dates. I'd love to know which dates you're referring to. Bruno Mars considered Bang Bang significant as an early work that already displays their mature
1091:
I feel that it is superfluous to have a separate article for the production discography, when it could easily go in this article. If the objection is that it would take away from the "flow" or "structure" of the main article, then I would suggest collapsing the structure on the page (but, if
721: 1457:
Mariosoultruthfan, you said that I made a mess. I'm assuming you are referring to my December 10th edits, since a few days before that, you sent me a Thank you note. What is the problem with my December 10th edits? Is it: Inaccurate? Poorly written? Inadequately supported with citations?
1244:
Firstly, thank you for the thank you. I spent quite a bit of time doing those edits, so it does feel good to receive gratitude in response. (I'm new to seriously editing Knowledge, and I've now begun to understand how most proper editors probably feel a lot of the time; spending ages
1022:
First of all, thank you. Unfortunately, since they "dismembered" no more works were realeased and Mars doesn't talk anymore about The Smeezingtons. However, if anything else is find it will be added. If you have any sources feel free to add them. Have a nice day
1461:
I thought that I added good information about wavin Flags and bang bang. The support for the wavin Flags info is in the Knowledge article for wavin Flags. I checked all Wavin flags info carefully regarding the chronology.
153: 1465:
I Tried to show when the name changed . The Troubadour 2/2009 cover notes do not say Smeezingtons, but the 8/2009 cover notes for Get Sexy do say Smeezingtons. So that narrows down the date of the name change.
677: 553: 1092:
possible, I'd like to avoid doing that). The production discography is short enough to include in this main article, especially compared to similar articles about other producers such as
1516:
I was referring to the formation of the Smeezingtons, you should add dates like "May 2009" just an example, instead of "05/2009". Yes, I agree bang bang would fit better in that section.
1043:
The article clearly features content that is subjective and non-balanced. Take "They are currently one of the most sought-after production and writing team"; says who? By what measure?
946:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 1565: 1485:
Bang" doesn't need to be mentioned in the main article, as it wasn't the song that gave them recognition. However, I would add it to the discography as it was released as a single.
499: 1655: 1142:
The more I think about it, the more I think it might be a good idea to merge for now but keep an eye on this article as Bruno et al keep working. You're right, they're not exactly
981: 971: 1575: 1245:
creating/improving pages that millions of others will read without taking a moment to think about the editors. Still, the product is great, and it's awesome to be a part of it.)
340: 1660: 1580: 147: 1065:
tag "this page reads like an ad" or at least put quotation marks around the phrases above. Once again, those phrases make it sound like someone was hired to write this.
1560: 1006:
I think this article is really well written. You've got some nice references and links, and the tone is nice too. It could just do with a few more references, though.
255: 1650: 947: 1501:
sound, including their skill with live instrumentation. The citation makes this clear. Maybe Bang Bang would fit better in the section on influences and style.
1610: 1605: 1550: 682: 345: 1595: 942: 903: 642: 632: 328:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 1625: 787: 777: 79: 1640: 1615: 880: 870: 44: 1585: 451: 320: 1600: 1570: 1166:
I have been adding information in order to improve this page. How about creating a production discography page? I have a lot more info to add.
1645: 1590: 1050: 608: 85: 1620: 1555: 753: 455: 1256:
But these aren't big issues, and the rest of the article is well-written and informative, so I think it deserves Good Article status now.
1175:
important force in music moving forward. As a reader i found myself having to re-read several sections due to structure and grammar.
1072: 219: 1635: 846: 459: 1337:
The article says 1980, but Italian wikipedia says 1976. The source provided only provides a citation for the birthday, not the year.
1376: 450:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 1128:
hasty to merge the articles. But if you do, it's really not that serious to break them up again if these guys keep getting work.--
1540: 593: 548: 744: 705: 494: 446: 402: 397: 207: 168: 99: 30: 135: 104: 20: 842: 833: 810: 201: 74: 1545: 1028: 934: 372: 1630: 1521: 1490: 1206: 65: 669: 525: 129: 289: 270: 1054: 1076: 125: 1368: 1342: 1024: 329: 109: 1190: 1182: 1517: 1486: 1284: 1202: 1439: 1419:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1314: 1261: 1219: 378: 189: 175: 1367:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1151: 1133: 1186: 1178: 1506: 1474: 1397: 1114: 1068: 1046: 1010: 408: 339:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 651: 161: 55: 1147: 1129: 752:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
607:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1338: 343:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 70: 1377:
http://justbrunomars.com/bruno-mars/interviews/bruno-mars-interview-justbrunomars-com-exclusive/
1420: 918: 897: 585: 211: 141: 51: 1435: 1360: 1310: 1257: 1215: 736: 438: 24: 1427: 1096:. Only producers with long credit histories tend to have separate discography pages (e.g. 1502: 1470: 1106: 336: 1346: 1199:---I know I'm trying to fix that. It's really hard working you could help if you want 730: 720: 699: 1426:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1534: 837:, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of 825: 804: 484: 1093: 569: 542: 422: 391: 1143: 1101: 924: 726: 659: 603: 598: 575: 428: 1469:
If my edits lack citations, I can restore them with more citations. Thanks.
749: 1525: 1510: 1494: 1478: 1447: 1318: 1288: 1265: 1223: 1194: 1155: 1137: 1121: 1080: 1058: 1032: 1016: 508: 1453:
Reversals of my contributions re Bang Bang, Wavin Flags, and name change.
748:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to 838: 1414:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
1097: 1309:
No problem, and thank you also for putting time into this article.
458:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 354: 335:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
312: 15: 1382:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
650: 507: 483: 1371:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
845:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 841:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, visit the
597:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1364: 282: 160: 1087:Merge of The Smeezingtons production discography 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1656:Low-importance R&B and Soul Music articles 217:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 1566:Low-importance biography (musicians) articles 174: 8: 1576:Knowledge requested photographs of musicians 956:Knowledge:WikiProject R&B and Soul Music 1661:WikiProject R&B and Soul Music articles 959:Template:WikiProject R&B and Soul Music 1359:I have just modified one external link on 892: 799: 694: 537: 386: 231: 184: 1581:Knowledge requested photographs of people 1651:GA-Class R&B and Soul Music articles 1561:GA-Class biography (musicians) articles 894: 801: 696: 539: 388: 1185:) 14:08, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Ted M. 1394:to let others know (documentation at 7: 1611:Los Angeles area task force articles 1009:Just what I think of the article :) 940:This article is within the scope of 831:This article is within the scope of 742:This article is within the scope of 591:This article is within the scope of 444:This article is within the scope of 360: 358: 1606:Low-importance Los Angeles articles 1551:Biography articles of living people 377:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1596:Low-importance California articles 943:WikiProject R&B and Soul Music 14: 1626:Low-importance Pop music articles 1363:. Please take a moment to review 210:. If you can improve it further, 1405: 927: 917: 896: 824: 803: 729: 719: 698: 662: 617:Knowledge:WikiProject California 578: 568: 541: 516:An editor has requested that an 431: 421: 407: 390: 359: 318:This article must adhere to the 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1641:Low-importance Hip hop articles 1616:WikiProject California articles 1375:Corrected formatting/usage for 976:This article has been rated as 962:R&B and Soul Music articles 875:This article has been rated as 782:This article has been rated as 762:Knowledge:WikiProject Pop music 637:This article has been rated as 620:Template:WikiProject California 468:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 1586:WikiProject Biography articles 765:Template:WikiProject Pop music 471:Template:WikiProject Biography 198:has been listed as one of the 1: 1601:GA-Class Los Angeles articles 1571:Musicians work group articles 1526:15:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 1511:15:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 1495:13:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC) 1479:03:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC) 1156:03:28, 15 December 2010 (UTC) 1138:03:26, 15 December 2010 (UTC) 950:and see a list of open tasks. 935:R&B and Soul Music portal 855:Knowledge:WikiProject Hip hop 756:and see a list of open tasks. 675:This article is supported by 611:and see a list of open tasks. 492:This article is supported by 321:biographies of living persons 42:Put new text under old text. 1646:WikiProject Hip hop articles 1591:GA-Class California articles 1319:11:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1289:10:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 1266:09:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC) 1224:04:11, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 1195:14:08, 18 October 2013 (UTC) 1122:14:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 1081:01:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC) 1059:03:28, 17 October 2010 (UTC) 1033:20:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 858:Template:WikiProject Hip hop 456:contribute to the discussion 1621:GA-Class Pop music articles 1556:GA-Class biography articles 678:Los Angeles area task force 333:must be removed immediately 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1677: 1356:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1347:22:46, 16 April 2015 (UTC) 1332: 982:project's importance scale 881:project's importance scale 788:project's importance scale 670:Greater Los Angeles portal 643:project's importance scale 1636:GA-Class Hip hop articles 1448:15:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC) 975: 912: 874: 819: 781: 714: 658: 636: 563: 515: 491: 416: 385: 303: 234: 230: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1003:To the article creator- 1541:Knowledge good articles 1352:External links modified 1170:Readability and grammar 1017:18:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC) 1162:production discography 953:R&B and Soul Music 904:R&B and Soul Music 655: 594:WikiProject California 512: 488: 367:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 745:WikiProject Pop music 654: 511: 495:WikiProject Musicians 487: 447:WikiProject Biography 256:Articles for deletion 208:good article criteria 100:Neutral point of view 290:Good article nominee 271:Good article nominee 105:No original research 1546:Music good articles 1386:parameter below to 1333:Philip's birth year 1287:MarioSoulTruthFan 834:WikiProject Hip hop 623:California articles 202:Music good articles 1631:Pop music articles 1025:MarioSoulTruthFan1 768:Pop music articles 656: 513: 489: 474:biography articles 373:content assessment 235:Article milestones 86:dispute resolution 47: 1518:MarioSoulTruthFan 1487:MarioSoulTruthFan 1446: 1285:MarioSoulTruthFan 1203:MarioSoulTruthFan 1071:comment added by 1049:comment added by 996: 995: 992: 991: 988: 987: 891: 890: 887: 886: 798: 797: 794: 793: 693: 692: 689: 688: 586:California portal 536: 535: 532: 531: 353: 352: 311: 310: 299: 298: 226: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1668: 1442: 1441:Talk to my owner 1437: 1412: 1409: 1408: 1401: 1361:The Smeezingtons 1118: 1113: 1111: 1083: 1061: 1013: 964: 963: 960: 957: 954: 937: 932: 931: 930: 921: 914: 913: 908: 900: 893: 863: 862: 861:Hip hop articles 859: 856: 853: 828: 821: 820: 815: 807: 800: 770: 769: 766: 763: 760: 739: 737:Pop music portal 734: 733: 723: 716: 715: 710: 702: 695: 672: 667: 666: 665: 625: 624: 621: 618: 615: 588: 583: 582: 581: 572: 565: 564: 559: 556: 545: 538: 528:to this article. 476: 475: 472: 469: 466: 452:join the project 441: 439:Biography portal 436: 435: 434: 425: 418: 417: 412: 411: 410: 405: 394: 387: 370: 364: 363: 362: 355: 341:this noticeboard 313: 304:Current status: 285: 283:October 11, 2014 232: 215: 196:The Smeezingtons 192: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 25:The Smeezingtons 16: 1676: 1675: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1531: 1530: 1455: 1445: 1440: 1410: 1406: 1395: 1369:this simple FaQ 1354: 1335: 1172: 1164: 1116: 1107: 1105: 1104:). Thoughts? 1089: 1066: 1051:129.137.148.197 1044: 1041: 1012:Chevymontecarlo 1011: 1001: 961: 958: 955: 952: 951: 933: 928: 926: 906: 860: 857: 854: 851: 850: 813: 767: 764: 761: 758: 757: 735: 728: 708: 668: 663: 661: 622: 619: 616: 613: 612: 584: 579: 577: 557: 551: 473: 470: 467: 464: 463: 437: 432: 430: 406: 400: 371:on Knowledge's 368: 281: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1674: 1672: 1664: 1663: 1658: 1653: 1648: 1643: 1638: 1633: 1628: 1623: 1618: 1613: 1608: 1603: 1598: 1593: 1588: 1583: 1578: 1573: 1568: 1563: 1558: 1553: 1548: 1543: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1528: 1498: 1497: 1454: 1451: 1438: 1432: 1431: 1424: 1380: 1379: 1353: 1350: 1334: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1227: 1226: 1171: 1168: 1163: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1140: 1088: 1085: 1040: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1000: 997: 994: 993: 990: 989: 986: 985: 978:Low-importance 974: 968: 967: 965: 948:the discussion 939: 938: 922: 910: 909: 907:Low‑importance 901: 889: 888: 885: 884: 877:Low-importance 873: 867: 866: 864: 829: 817: 816: 814:Low‑importance 808: 796: 795: 792: 791: 784:Low-importance 780: 774: 773: 771: 754:the discussion 741: 740: 724: 712: 711: 709:Low‑importance 703: 691: 690: 687: 686: 683:Low-importance 674: 673: 657: 647: 646: 639:Low-importance 635: 629: 628: 626: 609:the discussion 590: 589: 573: 561: 560: 558:Low‑importance 546: 534: 533: 530: 529: 514: 504: 503: 500:Low-importance 490: 480: 479: 477: 443: 442: 426: 414: 413: 395: 383: 382: 376: 365: 351: 350: 346:this help page 330:poorly sourced 316: 309: 308: 301: 300: 297: 296: 293: 286: 278: 277: 274: 267: 263: 262: 259: 252: 248: 247: 244: 241: 237: 236: 228: 227: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1673: 1662: 1659: 1657: 1654: 1652: 1649: 1647: 1644: 1642: 1639: 1637: 1634: 1632: 1629: 1627: 1624: 1622: 1619: 1617: 1614: 1612: 1609: 1607: 1604: 1602: 1599: 1597: 1594: 1592: 1589: 1587: 1584: 1582: 1579: 1577: 1574: 1572: 1569: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1559: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1544: 1542: 1539: 1538: 1536: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1452: 1450: 1449: 1443: 1436: 1429: 1425: 1422: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1403: 1399: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1378: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1357: 1351: 1349: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1339:Bobby Martnen 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1290: 1286: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1169: 1167: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1120: 1119: 1112: 1110: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1086: 1084: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1073:69.231.115.13 1070: 1062: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1014: 1007: 1004: 998: 983: 979: 973: 970: 969: 966: 949: 945: 944: 936: 925: 923: 920: 916: 915: 911: 905: 902: 899: 895: 882: 878: 872: 869: 868: 865: 848: 844: 840: 836: 835: 830: 827: 823: 822: 818: 812: 809: 806: 802: 789: 785: 779: 776: 775: 772: 755: 751: 747: 746: 738: 732: 727: 725: 722: 718: 717: 713: 707: 704: 701: 697: 684: 681:(assessed as 680: 679: 671: 660: 653: 649: 648: 644: 640: 634: 631: 630: 627: 610: 606: 605: 600: 596: 595: 587: 576: 574: 571: 567: 566: 562: 555: 550: 547: 544: 540: 527: 523: 519: 510: 506: 505: 501: 498:(assessed as 497: 496: 486: 482: 481: 478: 461: 460:documentation 457: 453: 449: 448: 440: 429: 427: 424: 420: 419: 415: 404: 399: 396: 393: 389: 384: 380: 374: 366: 357: 356: 348: 347: 342: 338: 334: 331: 327: 323: 322: 317: 315: 314: 307: 302: 294: 292: 291: 287: 284: 280: 279: 275: 273: 272: 268: 266:March 7, 2014 265: 264: 260: 258: 257: 253: 250: 249: 245: 242: 239: 238: 233: 229: 224: 222: 221: 213: 209: 205: 204: 203: 197: 194: 191: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1499: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1433: 1413: 1404: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1381: 1358: 1355: 1336: 1201: 1198: 1177: 1173: 1165: 1115: 1108: 1094:Polow da Don 1090: 1067:— Preceding 1063: 1042: 1008: 1005: 1002: 977: 941: 876: 843:project page 832: 783: 743: 676: 638: 602: 592: 521: 517: 493: 445: 379:WikiProjects 344: 332: 325: 319: 306:Good article 305: 288: 269: 254: 251:May 10, 2010 218: 216: 212:please do so 200: 199: 195: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1398:Sourcecheck 1311:BreakfastJr 1258:BreakfastJr 1216:BreakfastJr 1187:ScoobyLives 1179:ScoobyLives 1045:—Preceding 554:Los Angeles 148:free images 31:not a forum 1535:Categories 1503:Robinesque 1471:Robinesque 1144:Just Blaze 1102:Just Blaze 1039:Neutrality 847:discussion 614:California 604:California 599:U.S. state 549:California 522:photograph 276:Not listed 206:under the 1428:this tool 1421:this tool 1148:mikomango 1130:mikomango 759:Pop music 750:pop music 706:Pop music 465:Biography 403:Musicians 398:Biography 337:libellous 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1434:Cheers.— 1069:unsigned 1047:unsigned 369:GA-class 220:reassess 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1444::Online 1384:checked 1365:my edit 980:on the 879:on the 852:Hip hop 839:hip hop 811:Hip hop 786:on the 641:on the 243:Process 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1392:failed 1146:yet.-- 1098:RedOne 999:Review 375:scale. 295:Listed 246:Result 126:Google 1109:Amit 526:added 518:image 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1522:talk 1507:talk 1491:talk 1475:talk 1388:true 1343:talk 1315:talk 1262:talk 1220:talk 1207:talk 1191:talk 1183:talk 1152:talk 1134:talk 1100:and 1077:talk 1055:talk 1029:talk 454:and 261:Kept 240:Date 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1402:). 1390:or 972:Low 871:Low 778:Low 633:Low 601:of 524:be 520:or 326:BLP 176:TWL 1537:: 1524:) 1509:) 1493:) 1477:) 1400:}} 1396:{{ 1345:) 1317:) 1264:) 1222:) 1209:) 1193:) 1154:) 1136:) 1117:► 1079:) 1057:) 1031:) 1015:. 685:). 552:: 502:). 401:: 223:it 214:. 156:) 54:; 1520:( 1505:( 1489:( 1473:( 1430:. 1423:. 1411:Y 1341:( 1313:( 1260:( 1218:( 1205:( 1189:( 1181:( 1150:( 1132:( 1075:( 1053:( 1027:( 984:. 883:. 849:. 790:. 645:. 462:. 381:: 349:. 324:( 225:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
The Smeezingtons
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Good article
Music good articles
good article criteria
please do so
reassess
Articles for deletion
Good article nominee

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑