Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Think for Yourself

Source 📝

875:, you've ended up underplaying the historical aspect of there being two separate bass lines. The lead now describes this feature as "atypical" but I think the previous wording – "a departure from convention" – is more accurate. The claim's supported in the main text by the statement that there was no precedence before "Think for Yourself" for having a standard bass part and a fuzz bass part on the one song. I imagine Spector might've had two bassists playing the same lines on a track, perhaps upright and electric to create a fatter sound. But the significant point is that this song contains two completely separate lines. 1314:
statement leads a reader who has listened to the song's lyrics to think that Gould is insinuating that contemporary listeners were idiots, which of course is untrue. If the song is about relationships, then it is, if anything, as Gould himself is reported as describing it in the very next sentence, an anti-love song. It cannot be both, surely. Right? You see, we have Gould calling it both in successive sentences. That’s great if we want to confuse the reader. The song is also described as a love song elsewhere in the article, and that's also strange, to be honest.
951:, and so it more fully informed his work as he tried to find his own voice as a songwriter. Put it another way, Lennon and McCartney had been writing so long by 1965, they'd been able to explore and develop by incorporating or imitating a long line of influences and musical heroes (Buddy Holly, Elvis, Carl Perkins, Little Richard, Wilson Pickett, etc) from the late '50s onwards, whereas, as most commentators have it, Harrison's development as a writer began, in effect, with his absorption in Dylan (and hallucinogens). 337: 316: 455: 21: 393: 285: 260: 670: 429: 857:(which, it goes without saying, focuses on rock history way outside the Beatles or the 1960s). Don't know what else to say. I certainly don't want to attribute this or any other first to the Beatles for the sake of it; but if they're credited with this, and nothing appears to challenge the point, it seems to me that it's "fact". 913:, I think it was, suggest the book's claims are dubious, partly fictional even. As I alluded to above, I'd forgotten the article was up for GAN – thought I'd pulled it before going away for a month in August. This Curley/Best issue was something I'd flagged in my mind back then. Will just cut the whole paragraph. 848:
at all highly, from the point of view of exploring what the album's about and its impact at the time, and I've read other readers expressing the same disappointment. One thing he is good at, though (too good), is jumping on tangential points and exploring them to the max, and he gives the fuzz bass
1313:
In the second para of the lyrics section, Gould is reported as saying that most contemporary listeners likely interpreted it as a love song. I don’t have the book, so cannot check whether he really says that?. But I know that contemporary listeners were able to work out what lyrics meant. The
976:
I agree, but I have to confess I'm utterly hopeless when it comes to samples here! I can't even get it together to play any of the files that are currently in Knowledge (XXG) music articles. If you or someone else wants to add a sample, that would be great, but I've never found it to be an issue
853:: this amounts to how loads of bass players long before the Beatles used to doctor their amps to achieve a distorted effect, but no one apparently had actually recorded bass played through a fuzzbox – which is the "first" that's stated under Recording. I've cited the statement to Everett's 1232:
Thanks once again, Ritchie, and especially for adding the sample (not that I can play it). You haven't commented on the "atypical"/"departure from convention" issue, but I'm hoping you're okay with reinstating the wording as I've suggested, to more accurately reflect what the sources say.
908:
Aargh. In fact, it's only this "Best biographer Mallory Curley" who says that writers/commentators have interpreted it as a song directed at Best. Months ago, I looked everywhere I could to see if anyone held that opinion (it was complete news to me as well), let alone whether it was an
946:
Dylan certainly (still) influenced Lennon, and for the first time McCartney, around this period, yes. I think the point that Inglis is making is that Dylan was a far more profound influence/inspiration for Harrison because he was just beginning to really engage with songwriting
1175:
I've added mention of the first bootleg release. Somewhere down the line, I might add a bit more detail on this tape. It receives a fair bit of attention in books by John Winn and Richie Unterberger, and (as Unterberger notes) pages worth of commentary in
635:
organ. Does anyone know which keyboard Lennon played in the song? I would think that these sites would be more accurate. Otherwise, the "electric piano" claim would have to be cited because I can't find any sites that credit Lennon on the Hohner Pianet in
909:
interpretation that had gained some traction with others. I found nothing, but I did find enough to realise that Curley's book is in no way a reliable source: it's self-published (I couldn't even get an ISBN for the title); and comments by
1117:: I know you're a Macca fan 'n all, but do you really think the Ricky image needs to look so gigantic?! I laughed at first but, quite honestly, I'd rather we lose the pic altogether than see it appear so comically large. 207: 1289:. In the introduction to the book (from memory), Miles acknowledges Doggett, Patrick Humphries and Chris Charlesworth as fellow contributors. Doggett's and Humphries' pieces were later compiled into the 2010 book 844:, say – yes. (If the Who released a track before 3 December '65 with Entwistle playing bass through a fuzzbox, and it's supported by a reliable source, then OK …) I don't rate Kruth's book on 901:
to the other viewpoints. Given Harrison wrote "Taxman" not long after this, having a swing at the government and the "squares" sounds the most obvious choice of where the lyrics came from.
969:
While the musical form is all technically correct, I think this is one instance where a 5-6 second audio sample of the chord sequence in the verse would help explain things to the reader.
829:
was playing bass through Marshall 4x12s twelve months before this was recorded and was well-known for putting all sorts of effects through his bass, though possibly not as early as '65.
478: 799:
I guess you mean in the lead – "The song's lyrics … The lyrics …" Have rephrased but personally I'm always keen to avoid constant mentions of "the song" (hence some rewording
201: 675: 939:" - wasn't Lennon equally Dylan-influenced at this point, though? ("You've Got To Hide Your Love Away" and "Norwegian Wood" have Dylan's influenced stamped all over them). 352:
and related topics on Knowledge (XXG). Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.
708: 698: 570: 383: 133: 1354: 373: 1113:
Okay, I've reworded it. I was trying too hard perhaps to avoid the implication that McCartney's own 4001S was necessarily the guitar in the picture. PS. Re
1369: 1216:
I think everything's been addressed; the issue with the picture or choices about copyediting don't really affect the GA criteria, so I'll pass this now.
98: 1379: 1374: 139: 680: 1349: 46: 897:
before. Although there are multiple sources confirming this, I think it still might be worth trimming this section down a little bit to give
569:
to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles
849:
part on "Think for Yourself" some attention. So, endnote 4 in the article condenses his discussion of possible precedents, with input from
84: 501: 486: 344: 321: 1364: 1339: 474: 703: 153: 38: 158: 74: 1255: 1224: 1209: 1147: 1081: 1003: 768: 747: 564: 222: 128: 32: 1359: 516: 189: 776:
Thanks for taking this one on, Ritchie. It's been so long a-sittin' on the noms pile, I'd pretty much forgotten all about it.
467: 296: 401: 119: 1016: 837: 757:
I'll give this a go. A quick read through suggests no problems, so I don't see any issues with this getting to GA status.
628: 1344: 1165: 1136: 726: 533: 53: 183: 584: 583:
This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not
541: 163: 722: 240: 266: 179: 302: 439: 1164:
recording of the vocal overdub session been released on bootlegs? (I've heard a boot of the overdubs for "
229: 1051:
For sure. He's playing eighths over the verses and choruses, set far right. Always makes me think of the
109: 20: 492: 270: 1275: 124: 1320: 1253: 1222: 1207: 1145: 1135:
The reason for enlarging the pic was primarily because the caption looked squashed; no other reason.
1079: 1001: 766: 741: 42: 1052: 547: 336: 315: 215: 898: 641: 637: 612: 245: 78: 803:
to avoid "The song … a love song … Bob Dylan's song …"). I thought previous wording was better.
523: 195: 645: 105: 937:, whose work had inspired the Beatles, particularly Harrison, as a nascent songwriter in 1965 509: 435: 242: 1315: 1248: 1217: 1202: 1177: 1140: 1074: 996: 761: 737: 632: 1270:
Is it really Peter Doggett who wrote the "Diary" in 2001, or should it be Barry Miles? --
792:
Can you reword one of the two sentences next to each other that starts with "The lyrics"?
421: 624: 1298: 1238: 1189: 1122: 1060: 1031: 1017:
http://oldies.about.com/od/thebeatleshistory/a/The-Beatles-Songs-Think-For-Yourself.htm
982: 956: 918: 880: 862: 826: 808: 781: 629:
http://oldies.about.com/od/thebeatleshistory/a/The-Beatles-Songs-Think-For-Yourself.htm
454: 1333: 910: 496: 404:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Knowledge (XXG). 1073:
That'll be because of the triplets in the middle, emphasised by the fuzz bass line.
1271: 392: 1095: 932: 822: 616: 443: 349: 1044:
Is Lennon's keyboard part audible at all in the final release? I can't hear it.
850: 841: 244: 1325: 1302: 1294: 1279: 1257: 1242: 1234: 1226: 1211: 1193: 1185: 1149: 1126: 1118: 1083: 1064: 1056: 1035: 1027: 1005: 986: 978: 960: 952: 934: 922: 914: 894: 884: 876: 866: 858: 812: 804: 785: 777: 770: 751: 649: 855:
The Foundations of Rock: From "Blue Suede Shoes" to "Suite: Judy Blue Eyes"
729:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 823:
the first time that a bass guitar had been recorded with a fuzzbox device
607:
John Lennon on "Vox Continental organ" not "Hohner Pianet electric piano"
1168:" in which you can hear McCartney shout "oooh, bloody hell" at the end). 573:
onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.
620: 1285:
No, it's Doggett – he writes all the italicised song commentary in
893:
I hadn't heard about the lyrics possibly being directed towards
436:
A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project
278: 254: 246: 69: 15: 995:
I've dropped a sample in - hopefully that should be alright.
427: 391: 348:, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band 495:, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. 1114: 872: 800: 59: 214: 625:
http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/think-for-yourself/
1096:
A Rickenbacker 4001S. McCartney used a similar model
836:
Well, absolutely certain based on what the sources,
342:
This Beatles-related article is within the scope of
228: 825:" - are we absolutely certain this is the case? 87:for general discussion of the article's subject. 45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 1247:Yes, that's fine - it's just a minor niggle. 8: 658: 462:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 409: 310: 619:'s keyboard part was played on a Hohner 689: 661: 358:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject The Beatles 312: 273:is to use "the Beatles" mid-sentence. 7: 400:This article is within the scope of 284: 282: 1355:Low-importance The Beatles articles 1291:The Beatles: The Music and the Myth 1266:Retrospective assessment and legacy 933:The song reflects the influence of 301:It is of interest to the following 77:for discussing improvements to the 475:Category:The Beatles concert tours 14: 1370:GA-Class George Harrison articles 1201:That's about it really. On hold. 1106:Rickenbacker, which is a 4003FG). 1026:Yep, replaced with archived url. 104:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 41:. If you can improve it further, 1380:WikiProject The Beatles articles 453: 361:Template:WikiProject The Beatles 335: 314: 283: 258: 99:Click here to start a new topic. 19: 1375:GA-Class George Martin articles 1098:" - according to MacDonald, it 760:Specific comments will follow. 517:Category:The Beatles song stubs 378:This article has been rated as 650:07:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC) 473:Articles on each Beatle tour ( 29:has been listed as one of the 1: 1350:GA-Class The Beatles articles 1340:Knowledge (XXG) good articles 1258:12:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC) 1243:03:18, 22 November 2017 (UTC) 1227:20:34, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 1212:17:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC) 1194:01:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 1150:20:34, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 1127:01:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 1084:20:34, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 1065:01:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 1036:01:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 1006:20:34, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 987:01:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 961:01:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 923:01:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 885:01:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 867:01:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 813:01:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 786:13:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC) 771:13:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC) 752:13:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC) 96:Put new text under old text. 1309:Love song or anti-love song? 1303:04:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC) 1280:20:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC) 1166:You Never Give Me Your Money 613:Think for Yourself#Personnel 1137:File:Rickenbacker 4001S.jpg 727:Talk:Think for Yourself/GA1 1396: 1365:WikiProject Songs articles 1326:22:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC) 1139:might be a better choice. 1102:that model (as opposed to 384:project's importance scale 444:the index of WikiProjects 408: 399: 377: 330: 309: 134:Be welcoming to newcomers 631:it says that he played 623:electric piano, but in 565:WikiProject The Beatles 438:is available. See also 422:WikiProject The Beatles 345:WikiProject The Beatles 1360:GA-Class song articles 432: 396: 291:This article is rated 129:avoid personal attacks 57:: November 21, 2017. ( 873:first change you made 871:Incidentally, in the 801:later in the sentence 493:The Lost Lennon Tapes 431: 395: 295:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 154:Neutral point of view 39:good article criteria 530:Pics/Graphics wanted 440:the tool's wiki page 364:The Beatles articles 159:No original research 1345:Music good articles 1055:, for some reason. 33:Music good articles 1293:by Omnibus Press. 638:Think for Yourself 433: 397: 297:content assessment 140:dispute resolution 101: 79:Think for Yourself 27:Think for Yourself 1287:The Beatles Diary 1182:A Day in the Life 717: 716: 604: 603: 600: 599: 596: 595: 592: 591: 588: 580: 579: 571:assessed as stubs 402:WikiProject Songs 277: 276: 253: 252: 120:Assume good faith 97: 68: 67: 64: 1387: 1323: 1318: 1097: 938: 824: 671:Copyvio detector 659: 582: 568: 502:Adopt an article 479:Missing articles 468:Article requests 457: 450: 449: 430: 410: 366: 365: 362: 359: 356: 339: 332: 331: 326: 318: 311: 294: 288: 287: 286: 279: 271:this RfM closure 267:this RfC closure 262: 261: 255: 247: 233: 232: 218: 149:Article policies 70: 62: 60:Reviewed version 51: 23: 16: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1330: 1329: 1321: 1316: 1311: 1268: 1178:Mark Hertsgaard 721:This review is 713: 685: 657: 633:Vox Continental 609: 576: 562: 448: 428: 363: 360: 357: 354: 353: 324: 292: 259: 249: 248: 243: 175: 170: 169: 168: 145: 115: 58: 12: 11: 5: 1393: 1391: 1383: 1382: 1377: 1372: 1367: 1362: 1357: 1352: 1347: 1342: 1332: 1331: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1267: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1170: 1169: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1130: 1129: 1108: 1107: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1068: 1067: 1046: 1045: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1021: 1020: 1019:is a dead link 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 990: 989: 971: 970: 966: 965: 964: 963: 941: 940: 928: 927: 926: 925: 903: 902: 890: 889: 888: 887: 869: 838:Walter Everett 831: 830: 827:John Entwistle 818: 817: 816: 815: 794: 793: 789: 788: 756: 732: 731: 715: 714: 712: 711: 706: 701: 695: 692: 691: 687: 686: 684: 683: 681:External links 678: 673: 667: 664: 663: 656: 653: 608: 605: 602: 601: 598: 597: 594: 593: 590: 589: 581: 578: 577: 575: 574: 550: 537: 519: 505: 482: 461: 459: 458: 426: 425: 424: 415: 414: 406: 405: 398: 388: 387: 380:Low-importance 376: 370: 369: 367: 340: 328: 327: 325:Low‑importance 319: 307: 306: 300: 289: 275: 274: 265:Consensus per 263: 251: 250: 241: 239: 238: 235: 234: 172: 171: 167: 166: 161: 156: 147: 146: 144: 143: 136: 131: 122: 116: 114: 113: 102: 93: 92: 89: 88: 82: 66: 65: 50: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1392: 1381: 1378: 1376: 1373: 1371: 1368: 1366: 1363: 1361: 1358: 1356: 1353: 1351: 1348: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1338: 1337: 1335: 1328: 1327: 1324: 1319: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1265: 1259: 1256: 1254: 1252: 1251: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1225: 1223: 1221: 1220: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1208: 1206: 1205: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1158: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1144: 1143: 1138: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1093: 1092: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1078: 1077: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1015: 1014: 1007: 1004: 1002: 1000: 999: 994: 993: 992: 991: 988: 984: 980: 975: 974: 973: 972: 968: 967: 962: 958: 954: 950: 945: 944: 943: 942: 936: 930: 929: 924: 920: 916: 912: 911:Spencer Leigh 907: 906: 905: 904: 900: 896: 892: 891: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 847: 843: 839: 835: 834: 833: 832: 828: 820: 819: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 797: 796: 795: 791: 790: 787: 783: 779: 775: 774: 773: 772: 769: 767: 765: 764: 758: 754: 753: 749: 746: 743: 739: 736: 730: 728: 724: 719: 718: 710: 707: 705: 702: 700: 697: 696: 694: 693: 688: 682: 679: 677: 674: 672: 669: 668: 666: 665: 660: 654: 652: 651: 647: 643: 639: 634: 630: 626: 622: 618: 615:it says that 614: 606: 586: 572: 566: 560: 557: 555: 551: 549: 546: 544: 543: 538: 535: 531: 528: 526: 525: 520: 518: 514: 512: 511: 506: 504: 503: 498: 497:Apple Records 494: 491: 489: 488: 483: 480: 476: 472: 470: 469: 464: 463: 460: 456: 452: 451: 447: 445: 441: 437: 423: 419: 418: 417: 416: 412: 411: 407: 403: 394: 390: 389: 385: 381: 375: 372: 371: 368: 351: 347: 346: 341: 338: 334: 333: 329: 323: 320: 317: 313: 308: 304: 298: 290: 281: 280: 272: 268: 264: 257: 256: 237: 236: 231: 227: 224: 221: 217: 213: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 181: 178: 177:Find sources: 174: 173: 165: 164:Verifiability 162: 160: 157: 155: 152: 151: 150: 141: 137: 135: 132: 130: 126: 123: 121: 118: 117: 111: 107: 106:Learn to edit 103: 100: 95: 94: 91: 90: 86: 80: 76: 72: 71: 61: 56: 55: 48: 44: 40: 36: 35: 34: 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1312: 1290: 1286: 1269: 1249: 1218: 1215: 1203: 1200: 1181: 1162:audio verite 1161: 1141: 1103: 1099: 1075: 997: 948: 854: 845: 762: 759: 755: 744: 734: 733: 720: 709:Instructions 610: 558: 553: 552: 548:Beatle wives 540: 539: 529: 522: 521: 508: 507: 500: 485: 484: 466: 465: 434: 379: 343: 303:WikiProjects 225: 219: 211: 204: 198: 192: 186: 176: 148: 73:This is the 52: 43:please do so 31: 30: 26: 846:Rubber Soul 723:transcluded 617:John Lennon 413:To-do list: 355:The Beatles 350:The Beatles 322:The Beatles 202:free images 85:not a forum 1334:Categories 1317:Boscaswell 1250:Ritchie333 1219:Ritchie333 1204:Ritchie333 1142:Ritchie333 1076:Ritchie333 998:Ritchie333 899:due weight 851:Carol Kaye 842:John Kruth 763:Ritchie333 738:Ritchie333 676:Authorship 662:GA toolbox 585:create one 499:See also: 37:under the 1115:your edit 935:Bob Dylan 895:Pete Best 735:Reviewer: 699:Templates 690:Reviewing 655:GA Review 477:). See: 142:if needed 125:Be polite 75:talk page 1160:Has the 977:before. 748:contribs 704:Criteria 293:GA-class 110:get help 83:This is 81:article. 47:reassess 1272:Taxtman 1053:cha-cha 642:Kevjgav 559:Project 534:Kenwood 382:on the 208:WP refs 196:scholar 621:Pianet 561:: Add 542:Verify 524:Update 487:Expand 299:scale. 180:Google 54:Review 949:Help! 947:post- 725:from 554:Other 515:See: 510:Stubs 223:JSTOR 184:books 138:Seek 1322:talk 1299:talk 1295:JG66 1276:talk 1239:talk 1235:JG66 1190:talk 1186:JG66 1123:talk 1119:JG66 1061:talk 1057:JG66 1032:talk 1028:JG66 983:talk 979:JG66 957:talk 953:JG66 919:talk 915:JG66 881:talk 877:JG66 863:talk 859:JG66 840:and 809:talk 805:JG66 782:talk 778:JG66 742:talk 646:talk 627:and 442:and 420:For 269:and 216:FENS 190:news 127:and 1180:'s 1100:was 640:.-- 611:In 374:Low 230:TWL 49:it. 1336:: 1301:) 1278:) 1241:) 1192:) 1184:. 1125:) 1104:my 1063:) 1034:) 985:) 959:) 921:) 883:) 865:) 811:) 784:) 750:) 648:) 567:}} 563:{{ 532:: 446:. 210:) 108:; 63:). 1297:( 1274:( 1237:( 1188:( 1121:( 1094:" 1059:( 1030:( 981:( 955:( 931:" 917:( 879:( 861:( 821:" 807:( 780:( 745:· 740:( 644:( 587:? 556:: 545:: 536:. 527:: 513:: 490:: 481:. 471:: 386:. 305:: 226:· 220:· 212:· 205:· 199:· 193:· 187:· 182:( 112:.

Index

Good articles
Music good articles
good article criteria
please do so
reassess
Review
Reviewed version
talk page
Think for Yourself
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.