175:
154:
597:
576:
291:
270:
811:
607:
301:
185:
848:
75:
735:
708:
496:
475:
506:
745:
1162:
21:
407:
386:
123:
948:, is the only case to interpret the Third Amendment, and it does interpret the language regarding "private homes" as being consistent with how the term is used in Fourth Amendment cases, which would mean it includes any property "recognized and permitted by society as founded on lawful occupation or possession with a legal right to exclude others" -- this includes apartments and hotel rooms.
1644:
1064:
987:
Seriously, this is getting extremely stupid. Certain
Knowledge editors are using the {{citation needed}} as a crutch rather than actually finding sources to cite. It's getting ridiculous. Anyone able to access this site is able to look up a good source for the two {{citation needed}}s in the middle
1130:
Comparing the current text to some other encyclopedia articles, I think this is actually ready to nominate for GA. I've expanded the discussion of background a bit, improved the citation, and made some other changes, but there's simply not much to be said about the amendment. I'm going to nominate
922:
The lead of the article says "private homes". The text of the
Constitution says "any house". Is there a Supreme Court ruling which uses the term "private home"? I could interpret "any house" far more widely (apartment house, warehouse, outhouse, opera house). There may be a fair housing ruling
1309:
There seems to be a disconnect between the first and the second sentences of this section. We have
Madison rummaging through books for various rights, then we have several "revisions" (is this the proper AmerEng term?) of the amendment. What is missing is a sentence about Madison writing the
1114:
I'll probably try in the coming weeks to bring this article to Good
Article status. I thought I'd start by asking here if any longtime editors of this article have input--any changes you particularly want to see? Thanks to all who have worked on this one before me. --
1335:
Not needed at the GA level but if you were to bring this to FAC I'd expect to see some discussion of the ratification debates, if the 3rd played any part in that, or at least if there was opposition to the 3rd's ratification and what it was based on if
1167:
1257:"prohibits, in peacetime or wartime, the quartering of soldiers in private homes without the owner's consent. " Is that really what it says? I agree on the peacetime bit, but in time of war, it seems to say that Congress can prescribe for it.
1172:
1364:"There have been no major Supreme Court cases concerning violations of the Third Amendment, and as of 2009, no Supreme Court decision has used the amendment as its primary basis" Cannot this be simplified?
864:
1559:
It appears that at some point in the history of periodic vandalism of this article, some images were lost when the vandalism was reverted. I have restored them while keeping the vandalism removed.
1446:
stating that despite the finding, the case was dismissed on remand, basically because there was so little case law on the 3rd, that the state officials couldn't have known they were violating it.--
1389:"Justice William O. Douglas cited the amendment as a partial basis " Perhaps "cited the amendment, with others in the Bill of Rights, as a partial basis". He had a whole laundry list as I recall.
1717:
Narrowest interpretation only mentions soldiers. Slightly (1 degree) broader interpretation (annotated) shows it to be about property rights. It can not be denied property rights does exists.
1838:
1788:
357:
347:
1218:
53:
1713:"No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house (property), without the consent of the owner (property rights), nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
1537:
953:
The case is a 2nd
Circuit decision; since it's the only circuit decision on point, it would be highly persuasive in other circuits, but it is legally only binding in the 2nd Circuit.
1793:
637:
1783:
1763:
323:
1863:
825:
32:
1671:
In the 'Judicial interpretation' section, the first and second (incomplete) paragraphs are repeated after the 3rd paragraph, although the 2nd is apparently completed there.
1758:
1530:
654:
820:
718:
314:
275:
1598:
I registered an account here because I noticed this, so I can't really fix it since the article seems to be only editable by users who are 'automatically confirmed':
1833:
1773:
1200:
680:
231:
1868:
690:
241:
1803:
1720:
Owners right's can not be superceded, not even in time of war (national emergency), except in a manner prescribed by law (only in times of national emergency).
457:
447:
1858:
1190:
1843:
644:
1262:
You're quite right; I'm not sure if I inherited this sentence and failed to fix it or simply blundered in its writing. Does this phrasing seem better? --
1808:
1093:
1853:
1778:
801:
791:
1828:
1768:
649:
207:
900:
1798:
423:
1873:
1818:
548:
1576:
Semi-protection has been requested, preferably for months, because this article seems to be a target for stupid vandalism every few weeks.
1024:
1004:
989:
558:
1536:
A discussion is ongoing about the lead to the Second
Amendment to the United States Constitution article. Please help form a consensus at
1848:
1731:
1723:
767:
620:
581:
198:
159:
46:
1100:
632:
414:
391:
1823:
319:
1614:"Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson announced the The Third Amendment has been invoked in a few instances as helping establish..."
1281:
If at all possible, diminish the frequency of use of the word "quartering" in the first paragraph and "constitution" in the second.
1753:
1195:
38:
1813:
758:
713:
1096:
628:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1239:
134:
1739:
1699:
1682:
1629:
1585:
1568:
1549:
1521:
1507:
1492:
1473:
1455:
1433:
1405:
1380:
1352:
1326:
1297:
1271:
1243:
1140:
1124:
1104:
1080:
1055:
1038:
1012:
997:
967:
936:
912:
100:
1601:
The section "Judicial
Interpretation" seems to be suffering from a good deal of copy/paste artifacts. These include:
1094:
http://minutemennews.com/2013/07/police-seize-home-arrest-owners-to-gain-tactical-advantage-investigating-neighbors/
1581:
1564:
958:
I'll leave it to you or other editors to decide if the article needs any further revision to clarify this point.
519:
480:
104:
876:
1028:
1023:
Can we add a 'see also' to reference the
Quartering Acts or Quartering in Time of War for historical context?Z
1008:
993:
1611:
Paragraph 5 contains what seems to be a copy/paste artifact at a point similar to the ending of paragraph 2:
988:
of the article. I'm going to time how long it takes for me to find the citations. I'm starting at 11:15AM. --
880:
1735:
1727:
1650:
523:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
1483:
Let me know if you think these edits cover the points above, and thanks for all the solid suggestions. --
976:
Shouldn't this also include private homes? It was the private homes that people were most infuriated about.
1214:
203:
20:
1625:
1545:
140:
174:
153:
1512:
This article has been promoted to GA. I find it meets the criteria (sorry about no fancy template).--
1131:
now, but input is obviously still welcome if any article watchers have suggestions. Cheers to all, --
1678:
1577:
1560:
1034:
930:
612:
306:
190:
1621:
1076:
1051:
108:
1343:
I haven't found anything about opposition to the 3rd specifically, but I'll keep my eyes open. --
766:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
422:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
322:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
206:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
882:
596:
575:
1517:
1503:
1488:
1469:
1451:
1429:
1401:
1376:
1348:
1322:
1293:
1267:
1233:
1136:
1120:
963:
42:
1541:
944:
878:
847:
290:
269:
83:
810:
74:
1674:
925:
750:
1072:
1047:
908:
1620:
Note that paragraph 3 contains unique information and probably should not be deleted.
1090:
744:
734:
707:
1747:
625:
1689:
1513:
1499:
1484:
1465:
1447:
1425:
1397:
1372:
1344:
1318:
1289:
1263:
1229:
1132:
1116:
959:
419:
1246:
I've looked it over. A few comments, but generally this seems to meet the grade:
495:
474:
505:
974:"...which had allowed the British Army to lodge soldiers in public buildings."
740:
602:
511:
501:
406:
385:
296:
180:
904:
1221:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
624:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
99:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
1605:
Duplicated information between paragraphs 1 and 2, and paragraphs 4 and 5.
1538:
Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution#Proposal for lead
763:
923:
from the 1960s that has such a limit, but I would like a cite.
1638:
883:
841:
524:
116:
69:
15:
897:
The 23:14, 8 February 2011 Some jerk on the Internet version
809:
1219:
Talk:Third Amendment to the United States Constitution/GA1
318:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
202:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
896:
59:
1417:
What's the difference between judicial and case law?
762:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
418:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1091:
https://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/03/59061.htm
1839:GA-Class United States articles of High-importance
1789:Top-importance United States Constitution articles
1531:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution
27:Third Amendment to the United States Constitution
332:Knowledge:WikiProject United States Constitution
45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
335:Template:WikiProject United States Constitution
1794:WikiProject United States Constitution things
1635:Semi-protected edit request on 2 January 2015
1442:I would add a sentence to your discussion of
8:
1784:GA-Class United States Constitution articles
1764:Knowledge articles that use American English
1608:Paragraph 2 ends in the middle of a sentence
1424:Fair point--removing unneeded subheader. --
1864:High-importance American politics articles
1150:
702:
570:
469:
380:
264:
148:
87:, which has its own spelling conventions (
1759:Social sciences and society good articles
1706:3rd Amendment is Actually Property Rights
33:Social sciences and society good articles
1498:They're fine. Promoting momentarily.--
1181:
1153:
1046:I don't see why not. Seems practical.--
704:
572:
471:
382:
266:
150:
1834:High-importance United States articles
1774:High-importance U.S. Congress articles
315:WikiProject United States Constitution
1869:American politics task force articles
107:, this should not be changed without
7:
1804:Low-importance Human rights articles
1003:There, 2 citations in 10 minutes. --
942:The case referenced in the article,
756:This article is within the scope of
618:This article is within the scope of
517:This article is within the scope of
412:This article is within the scope of
367:This article is about one (or many)
312:This article is within the scope of
251:This article is about one (or many)
196:This article is within the scope of
122:
120:
1859:GA-Class American politics articles
899:of this article is translated into
665:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
527:and the subjects encompassed by it.
338:United States Constitution articles
216:Knowledge:WikiProject U.S. Congress
139:It is of interest to the following
1844:WikiProject United States articles
1317:I've added slightly more here. --
892:Translation into Chinese Knowledge
668:Template:WikiProject United States
432:Knowledge:WikiProject Human rights
219:Template:WikiProject U.S. Congress
14:
1809:WikiProject Human rights articles
1594:Repeated section (c/p artifacts?)
435:Template:WikiProject Human rights
320:Constitution of the United States
41:. If you can improve it further,
1854:Low-importance politics articles
1779:WikiProject U.S. Congress things
1642:
1062:
846:
743:
733:
706:
605:
595:
574:
504:
494:
473:
405:
384:
299:
289:
268:
183:
173:
152:
121:
73:
19:
1829:GA-Class United States articles
1769:GA-Class U.S. Congress articles
796:This article has been rated as
685:This article has been rated as
553:This article has been rated as
452:This article has been rated as
352:This article has been rated as
236:This article has been rated as
1799:GA-Class Human rights articles
776:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
1874:WikiProject Politics articles
1630:11:05, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
1110:Going for Good Article status
913:13:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
818:This article is supported by
779:Template:WikiProject Politics
770:and see a list of open tasks.
426:and see a list of open tasks.
326:and see a list of open tasks.
210:and see a list of open tasks.
1819:High-importance law articles
1586:23:16, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
1569:23:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
1550:13:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
821:American politics task force
1700:06:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
1683:06:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
1665:to reactivate your request.
1653:has been answered. Set the
1890:
1849:GA-Class politics articles
1740:20:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
802:project's importance scale
691:project's importance scale
559:project's importance scale
458:project's importance scale
358:project's importance scale
329:United States Constitution
276:United States Constitution
242:project's importance scale
1522:01:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
1508:01:34, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
1493:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
1474:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
1456:23:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
1434:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
1406:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
1381:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
1353:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
1327:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
1304:Proposal and ratification
1298:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
1272:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
1244:23:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
1141:01:33, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
1125:10:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
1081:19:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
1056:19:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
1039:19:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
1013:15:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
998:15:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
968:02:34, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
937:03:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
817:
795:
728:
684:
621:WikiProject United States
590:
552:
533:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
489:
451:
400:
366:
351:
284:
250:
235:
199:WikiProject U.S. Congress
168:
147:
1824:WikiProject Law articles
1105:03:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
626:United States of America
536:Template:WikiProject Law
415:WikiProject Human rights
1754:Knowledge good articles
1097:Are you ready for IPv6?
814:
671:United States articles
222:U.S. Congress articles
204:United States Congress
129:This article is rated
1814:GA-Class law articles
813:
438:Human rights articles
39:good article criteria
1288:Cut one of each. --
759:WikiProject Politics
613:United States portal
307:United States portal
191:United States portal
105:relevant style guide
101:varieties of English
972:The lead also says
639:Articles Requested!
103:. According to the
1688:Fixed, thank you.
1086:Found another case
903:to expand a stub--
815:
135:content assessment
57:: July 26, 2013. (
1669:
1668:
1209:
1208:
901:Chinese Knowledge
889:
888:
870:
869:
840:
839:
836:
835:
832:
831:
782:politics articles
701:
700:
697:
696:
569:
568:
565:
564:
468:
467:
464:
463:
379:
378:
375:
374:
263:
262:
259:
258:
115:
114:
68:
67:
64:
1881:
1730:) Tae Hyun Song
1710:Amendment III
1697:
1660:
1656:
1646:
1645:
1639:
1163:Copyvio detector
1151:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1042:
945:Engblom v. Carey
933:
928:
884:
861:
860:
850:
842:
784:
783:
780:
777:
774:
753:
748:
747:
737:
730:
729:
724:
721:
710:
703:
673:
672:
669:
666:
663:
615:
610:
609:
608:
599:
592:
591:
586:
578:
571:
541:
540:
537:
534:
531:
514:
509:
508:
498:
491:
490:
485:
477:
470:
440:
439:
436:
433:
430:
409:
402:
401:
396:
388:
381:
340:
339:
336:
333:
330:
309:
304:
303:
302:
293:
286:
285:
280:
272:
265:
224:
223:
220:
217:
214:
193:
188:
187:
186:
177:
170:
169:
164:
156:
149:
132:
126:
125:
124:
117:
84:American English
80:This article is
77:
70:
62:
60:Reviewed version
51:
23:
16:
1889:
1888:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1744:
1743:
1714:
1708:
1690:
1658:
1654:
1643:
1637:
1596:
1578:Robert McClenon
1561:Robert McClenon
1557:
1534:
1213:This review is
1205:
1177:
1149:
1112:
1088:
1063:
1061:
1032:
1021:
985:
983:Citation Needed
931:
926:
920:
894:
885:
879:
855:
826:High-importance
781:
778:
775:
772:
771:
751:Politics portal
749:
742:
722:
716:
687:High-importance
670:
667:
664:
661:
660:
659:
645:Become a Member
611:
606:
604:
585:High‑importance
584:
555:High-importance
538:
535:
532:
529:
528:
520:WikiProject Law
510:
503:
484:High‑importance
483:
437:
434:
431:
428:
427:
394:
337:
334:
331:
328:
327:
305:
300:
298:
278:
238:High-importance
221:
218:
215:
212:
211:
189:
184:
182:
163:High‑importance
162:
133:on Knowledge's
130:
109:broad consensus
58:
12:
11:
5:
1887:
1885:
1877:
1876:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1786:
1781:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1746:
1745:
1716:
1712:
1707:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1667:
1666:
1647:
1636:
1633:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1609:
1606:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1556:
1553:
1533:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1459:
1458:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1419:
1418:
1414:
1413:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1391:
1390:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1366:
1365:
1361:
1360:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1338:
1337:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1312:
1311:
1306:
1305:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1283:
1282:
1278:
1277:
1274:
1259:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1224:
1223:
1207:
1206:
1204:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1179:
1178:
1176:
1175:
1173:External links
1170:
1165:
1159:
1156:
1155:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1111:
1108:
1087:
1084:
1059:
1058:
1037:comment added
1025:192.122.237.11
1020:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1005:68.230.167.244
990:68.230.167.244
984:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
955:
954:
950:
949:
927:Randall Bart
919:
916:
893:
890:
887:
886:
881:
877:
875:
872:
871:
868:
867:
857:
856:
851:
845:
838:
837:
834:
833:
830:
829:
816:
806:
805:
798:Low-importance
794:
788:
787:
785:
768:the discussion
755:
754:
738:
726:
725:
723:Low‑importance
711:
699:
698:
695:
694:
683:
677:
676:
674:
658:
657:
652:
647:
642:
635:
633:Template Usage
629:
617:
616:
600:
588:
587:
579:
567:
566:
563:
562:
551:
545:
544:
542:
516:
515:
499:
487:
486:
478:
466:
465:
462:
461:
454:Low-importance
450:
444:
443:
441:
424:the discussion
410:
398:
397:
395:Low‑importance
389:
377:
376:
373:
372:
365:
362:
361:
354:Top-importance
350:
344:
343:
341:
324:the discussion
311:
310:
294:
282:
281:
279:Top‑importance
273:
261:
260:
257:
256:
249:
246:
245:
234:
228:
227:
225:
208:the discussion
195:
194:
178:
166:
165:
157:
145:
144:
138:
127:
113:
112:
78:
66:
65:
50:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1886:
1875:
1872:
1870:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1752:
1751:
1749:
1742:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1732:73.118.175.67
1729:
1725:
1724:73.118.175.67
1721:
1718:
1711:
1705:
1701:
1698:
1696:
1695:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1664:
1661:parameter to
1652:
1648:
1641:
1640:
1634:
1632:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1613:
1612:
1610:
1607:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1599:
1593:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1554:
1552:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1532:
1529:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1440:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1388:
1387:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1334:
1333:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1308:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1260:
1256:
1255:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1245:
1241:
1238:
1235:
1231:
1228:
1222:
1220:
1216:
1211:
1210:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1188:
1186:
1185:
1180:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1161:
1160:
1158:
1157:
1152:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1109:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1092:
1085:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1069:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1040:
1036:
1030:
1026:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
995:
991:
982:
975:
971:
970:
969:
965:
961:
957:
956:
952:
951:
947:
946:
941:
940:
939:
938:
935:
934:
929:
918:Private homes
917:
915:
914:
910:
906:
902:
898:
891:
874:
873:
866:
863:
862:
859:
858:
854:
849:
844:
843:
827:
824:(assessed as
823:
822:
812:
808:
807:
803:
799:
793:
790:
789:
786:
769:
765:
761:
760:
752:
746:
741:
739:
736:
732:
731:
727:
720:
715:
712:
709:
705:
692:
688:
682:
679:
678:
675:
662:United States
656:
653:
651:
648:
646:
643:
641:
640:
636:
634:
631:
630:
627:
623:
622:
614:
603:
601:
598:
594:
593:
589:
583:
582:United States
580:
577:
573:
560:
556:
550:
547:
546:
543:
526:
522:
521:
513:
507:
502:
500:
497:
493:
492:
488:
482:
479:
476:
472:
459:
455:
449:
446:
445:
442:
425:
421:
417:
416:
411:
408:
404:
403:
399:
393:
390:
387:
383:
370:
364:
363:
359:
355:
349:
346:
345:
342:
325:
321:
317:
316:
308:
297:
295:
292:
288:
287:
283:
277:
274:
271:
267:
254:
248:
247:
243:
239:
233:
230:
229:
226:
213:U.S. Congress
209:
205:
201:
200:
192:
181:
179:
176:
172:
171:
167:
161:
160:U.S. Congress
158:
155:
151:
146:
142:
136:
128:
119:
118:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:
79:
76:
72:
71:
61:
56:
55:
48:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1722:
1719:
1715:
1709:
1693:
1691:
1673:
1670:
1662:
1651:edit request
1619:
1600:
1597:
1558:
1535:
1482:
1443:
1236:
1226:
1225:
1212:
1201:Instructions
1113:
1089:
1067:
1060:
1022:
986:
973:
943:
924:
921:
895:
852:
819:
797:
757:
686:
650:Project Talk
638:
619:
554:
539:law articles
518:
453:
429:Human rights
420:Human rights
413:
392:Human rights
368:
353:
313:
252:
237:
197:
141:WikiProjects
96:
92:
88:
81:
52:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
1542:Mark Miller
1215:transcluded
1033:—Preceding
525:legal field
82:written in
1748:Categories
1675:Naterade21
1655:|answered=
1310:amendment.
1276:Background
1168:Authorship
1154:GA toolbox
512:Law portal
37:under the
1464:Done. --
1371:Done. --
1227:Reviewer:
1191:Templates
1182:Reviewing
1147:GA Review
1073:JayJasper
1048:JayJasper
865:Archive 1
1622:Asattely
1412:Case law
1396:Done --
1359:Judicial
1240:contribs
1196:Criteria
1019:See Also
853:Archives
773:Politics
764:politics
719:American
714:Politics
369:thing(s)
253:Thing(s)
131:GA-class
97:traveled
47:reassess
1694:Calidum
1514:Wehwalt
1500:Wehwalt
1485:Khazar2
1466:Khazar2
1448:Wehwalt
1444:Engblom
1426:Khazar2
1398:Khazar2
1373:Khazar2
1345:Khazar2
1319:Khazar2
1290:Khazar2
1264:Khazar2
1230:Wehwalt
1133:Khazar2
1117:Khazar2
1035:undated
960:Hartboy
800:on the
689:on the
557:on the
456:on the
356:on the
240:on the
93:defense
1555:Images
932:Talk
655:Alerts
137:scale.
54:Review
1659:|ans=
1649:This
1217:from
89:color
1736:talk
1728:talk
1679:talk
1626:talk
1582:talk
1565:talk
1546:talk
1518:talk
1504:talk
1489:talk
1470:talk
1452:talk
1430:talk
1402:talk
1377:talk
1349:talk
1323:talk
1294:talk
1268:talk
1252:Lede
1234:talk
1137:talk
1121:talk
1101:talk
1077:talk
1068:Done
1052:talk
1029:talk
1009:talk
994:talk
964:talk
909:talk
905:Wing
681:High
549:High
232:High
1692:--
1657:or
1540:.--
1336:so.
1031:)
792:Low
530:Law
481:Law
448:Low
348:Top
49:it.
1750::
1738:)
1681:)
1663:no
1628:)
1584:)
1567:)
1548:)
1520:)
1506:)
1491:)
1472:)
1454:)
1432:)
1404:)
1379:)
1351:)
1325:)
1296:)
1270:)
1242:)
1139:)
1123:)
1103:)
1079:)
1071:--
1054:)
1011:)
996:)
966:)
911:)
828:).
717::
95:,
91:,
63:).
1734:(
1726:(
1677:(
1624:(
1580:(
1563:(
1544:(
1516:(
1502:(
1487:(
1468:(
1450:(
1428:(
1400:(
1375:(
1347:(
1321:(
1292:(
1266:(
1237:·
1232:(
1135:(
1119:(
1099:(
1075:(
1050:(
1041:.
1027:(
1007:(
992:(
962:(
907:(
804:.
693:.
561:.
460:.
371:.
360:.
255:.
244:.
143::
111:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
