42:
226:
There seems to be a disconnect between the first and the second sentences of this section. We have
Madison rummaging through books for various rights, then we have several "revisions" (is this the proper AmerEng term?) of the amendment. What is missing is a sentence about Madison writing the
252:
Not needed at the GA level but if you were to bring this to FAC I'd expect to see some discussion of the ratification debates, if the 3rd played any part in that, or at least if there was opposition to the 3rd's ratification and what it was based on if
47:
174:"prohibits, in peacetime or wartime, the quartering of soldiers in private homes without the owner's consent. " Is that really what it says? I agree on the peacetime bit, but in time of war, it seems to say that Congress can prescribe for it.
126:
122:
107:
99:
52:
281:"There have been no major Supreme Court cases concerning violations of the Third Amendment, and as of 2009, no Supreme Court decision has used the amendment as its primary basis" Cannot this be simplified?
363:
stating that despite the finding, the case was dismissed on remand, basically because there was so little case law on the 3rd, that the state officials couldn't have known they were violating it.--
306:"Justice William O. Douglas cited the amendment as a partial basis " Perhaps "cited the amendment, with others in the Bill of Rights, as a partial basis". He had a whole laundry list as I recall.
115:
17:
92:
80:
70:
179:
You're quite right; I'm not sure if I inherited this sentence and failed to fix it or simply blundered in its writing. Does this phrasing seem better? --
198:
If at all possible, diminish the frequency of use of the word "quartering" in the first paragraph and "constitution" in the second.
75:
438:
424:
409:
390:
372:
350:
322:
297:
269:
243:
214:
188:
160:
156:
400:
Let me know if you think these edits cover the points above, and thanks for all the solid suggestions. --
429:
This article has been promoted to GA. I find it meets the criteria (sorry about no fancy template).--
260:
I haven't found anything about opposition to the 3rd specifically, but I'll keep my eyes open. --
434:
420:
405:
386:
368:
346:
318:
293:
265:
239:
210:
184:
150:
430:
416:
401:
382:
364:
342:
314:
289:
261:
235:
206:
180:
146:
163:
I've looked it over. A few comments, but generally this seems to meet the grade:
134:
103:
18:
Talk:Third
Amendment to the United States Constitution
334:
What's the difference between judicial and case law?
359:I would add a sentence to your discussion of
8:
341:Fair point--removing unneeded subheader. --
30:
415:They're fine. Promoting momentarily.--
61:
33:
7:
234:I've added slightly more here. --
24:
1:
457:
439:01:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
425:01:34, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
410:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
391:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
373:23:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
351:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
323:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
298:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
270:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
244:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
221:Proposal and ratification
215:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
189:01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
161:23:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
205:Cut one of each. --
89:
88:
448:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
456:
455:
451:
450:
449:
447:
446:
445:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
454:
452:
444:
443:
442:
441:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
376:
375:
356:
355:
354:
353:
336:
335:
331:
330:
327:
326:
325:
308:
307:
303:
302:
301:
300:
283:
282:
278:
277:
274:
273:
272:
255:
254:
249:
248:
247:
246:
229:
228:
223:
222:
219:
218:
217:
200:
199:
195:
194:
191:
176:
175:
171:
170:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
453:
440:
436:
432:
428:
427:
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
357:
352:
348:
344:
340:
339:
338:
337:
333:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
311:
310:
309:
305:
304:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:
257:
256:
251:
250:
245:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:
230:
225:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
196:
192:
190:
186:
182:
178:
177:
173:
172:
168:
167:
166:
165:
164:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
399:
360:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
227:amendment.
193:Background
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
381:Done. --
288:Done. --
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
329:Case law
313:Done --
276:Judicial
157:contribs
76:Criteria
431:Wehwalt
417:Wehwalt
402:Khazar2
383:Khazar2
365:Wehwalt
361:Engblom
343:Khazar2
315:Khazar2
290:Khazar2
262:Khazar2
236:Khazar2
207:Khazar2
181:Khazar2
147:Wehwalt
127:history
108:history
94:Article
136:Watch
16:<
435:talk
421:talk
406:talk
387:talk
369:talk
347:talk
319:talk
294:talk
266:talk
240:talk
211:talk
185:talk
169:Lede
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
253:so.
437:)
423:)
408:)
389:)
371:)
349:)
321:)
296:)
268:)
242:)
213:)
187:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
433:(
419:(
404:(
385:(
367:(
345:(
317:(
292:(
264:(
238:(
209:(
183:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.