Knowledge

Talk:Threshold graph

Source 📝

84: 74: 53: 22: 217:, for all the most natural modification operations; vertex deletion, edge deletion, edge completion and edge editing." from section "Related classes of graphs and recognition" because it makes no sense. If someone can rewrite it so it says what it's supposed to, please do. Thanks. 140: 232:
What it means is that, given a graph that is not already a threshold graph, it's hard to find the smallest number of changes (of various types) to make it into a threshold graph. —
261: 130: 106: 256: 173: 97: 58: 33: 237: 177: 39: 83: 169: 21: 233: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89: 213:
I removed the sentence "Modification to threshold graph, that is, obtaining threshold graphs is
73: 52: 222: 196: 250: 218: 214: 192: 102: 79: 241: 226: 200: 181: 191:
It makes no difference, because this is a discrete, finite condition.
15: 162:
I think it must be "≤T" in the equivalent definition, right?
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 8: 167: 47: 49: 19: 7: 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 262:Low-priority mathematics articles 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 135:This article has been rated as 1: 242:05:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 227:02:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 201:02:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 257:C-Class mathematics articles 278: 182:14:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 141:project's priority scale 98:WikiProject Mathematics 28:This article is rated 158:Equivalent definition 121:mathematics articles 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 184: 172:comment added by 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 269: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 277: 276: 272: 271: 270: 268: 267: 266: 247: 246: 211: 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 275: 273: 265: 264: 259: 249: 248: 245: 244: 234:David Eppstein 210: 207: 206: 205: 204: 203: 186: 185: 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 274: 263: 260: 258: 255: 254: 252: 243: 239: 235: 231: 230: 229: 228: 224: 220: 216: 209:Modification? 208: 202: 198: 194: 190: 189: 188: 187: 183: 179: 175: 174:130.208.240.3 171: 165: 164: 163: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 212: 168:— Preceding 161: 137:Low-priority 136: 96: 62:Low‑priority 40:WikiProjects 215:NP-complete 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 251:Categories 166:I agree. 170:unsigned 139:on the 30:C-class 219:Zaslav 193:Zaslav 36:scale. 238:talk 223:talk 197:talk 178:talk 131:Low 253:: 240:) 225:) 199:) 180:) 236:( 221:( 195:( 176:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale
unsigned
130.208.240.3
talk
14:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Zaslav
talk
02:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
NP-complete
Zaslav
talk
02:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
David Eppstein
talk
05:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Categories
C-Class mathematics articles
Low-priority mathematics articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.