Knowledge

Talk:Tightness of measures

Source 📝

84: 74: 53: 22: 327: 140: 258: 514:
2. Your "correct assertion" is a verbatim copy of the statement you are criticizing, and the document you linked is not accessible. So it is not clear what you are trying to say.
355: 225: 205: 486: 462: 439: 419: 395: 546: 263: 130: 441:
is compact, then all sets of probability measures are tight, not just the singletons (see a couple lines above) and Prokhorov's theorem is toothless.
106: 541: 494: 162:
Definition of Tight Measure given in this article is not the same as Inner Regular Measure. For example, the article says that if we take
97: 58: 33: 363: 498: 39: 359: 230: 83: 21: 488:
is tight." This arise from the separability of Polish spaces, btw. For instance see Lemma 3.2 in
105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
522: 89: 73: 52: 332: 511:
1. Striking out text in articles is not the way to make correction. This does not help anyone.
210: 165: 471: 447: 424: 404: 380: 535: 518: 322:{\displaystyle \mu (X\setminus K_{\varepsilon })=\mu (\emptyset )=0<\varepsilon } 465: 398: 489: 526: 502: 367: 102: 79: 15: 474: 450: 427: 407: 383: 336: 266: 233: 213: 168: 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 480: 456: 433: 413: 389: 348: 321: 252: 219: 199: 227:that is not tight. But this cannot be so, since 490:http://www.math.chalmers.se/~serik/C-space.pdf 8: 207:with its order topology there is a measure 377:The section about Polish spaces says: "If 47: 473: 449: 426: 406: 382: 335: 283: 265: 238: 232: 212: 188: 167: 158:Conflicting definitions of Tight Measure 276: 49: 19: 7: 468:, then every probability measure on 401:, then every probability measure on 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 301: 253:{\displaystyle K_{\varepsilon }=X} 14: 547:Low-priority mathematics articles 508:Hi, what you say makes sense but: 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 349:{\displaystyle \varepsilon : --> 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 421:is tight." This is stupid. If 135:This article has been rated as 304: 298: 289: 270: 194: 175: 1: 444:The correct assertion is "If 368:00:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 542:C-Class mathematics articles 527:11:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC) 563: 503:20:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 141:project's priority scale 98:WikiProject Mathematics 482: 458: 435: 415: 391: 351: 323: 254: 221: 201: 28:This article is rated 483: 459: 436: 416: 392: 352: 324: 255: 222: 202: 472: 448: 425: 405: 381: 334: 264: 231: 220:{\displaystyle \mu } 211: 166: 121:mathematics articles 373:Incorrect statement 478: 454: 431: 411: 387: 346: 319: 250: 217: 200:{\displaystyle X=} 197: 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 481:{\displaystyle X} 457:{\displaystyle X} 434:{\displaystyle X} 414:{\displaystyle X} 390:{\displaystyle X} 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 554: 487: 485: 484: 479: 463: 461: 460: 455: 440: 438: 437: 432: 420: 418: 417: 412: 396: 394: 393: 388: 357: 354: 353: 347: 328: 326: 325: 320: 288: 287: 259: 257: 256: 251: 243: 242: 226: 224: 223: 218: 206: 204: 203: 198: 193: 192: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 562: 561: 557: 556: 555: 553: 552: 551: 532: 531: 470: 469: 446: 445: 423: 422: 403: 402: 379: 378: 375: 331: 330: 279: 262: 261: 234: 229: 228: 209: 208: 184: 164: 163: 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 560: 558: 550: 549: 544: 534: 533: 530: 529: 515: 512: 509: 495:69.204.248.106 477: 453: 430: 410: 386: 374: 371: 345: 342: 339: 318: 315: 312: 309: 306: 303: 300: 297: 294: 291: 286: 282: 278: 275: 272: 269: 249: 246: 241: 237: 216: 196: 191: 187: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 559: 548: 545: 543: 540: 539: 537: 528: 524: 520: 516: 513: 510: 507: 506: 505: 504: 500: 496: 492: 491: 475: 467: 464:is a compact 451: 442: 428: 408: 400: 397:is a compact 384: 372: 370: 369: 365: 361: 343: 340: 337: 316: 313: 310: 307: 295: 292: 284: 280: 273: 267: 260:is such that 247: 244: 239: 235: 214: 189: 185: 181: 178: 172: 169: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 493: 466:Polish space 443: 399:Polish space 376: 360:André Caldas 161: 137:Low-priority 136: 96: 62:Low‑priority 40:WikiProjects 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 536:Categories 356:0}" /: --> 519:Malparti 333:0}": --> 329:for any 139:on the 30:C-class 517:Best, 36:scale. 341:: --> 523:talk 499:talk 364:talk 314:< 131:Low 538:: 525:) 501:) 366:) 358:. 350:0} 338:ε 317:ε 302:∅ 296:μ 285:ε 277:∖ 268:μ 240:ε 215:μ 186:ω 521:( 497:( 476:X 452:X 429:X 409:X 385:X 362:( 344:0 311:0 308:= 305:) 299:( 293:= 290:) 281:K 274:X 271:( 248:X 245:= 236:K 195:] 190:1 182:, 179:0 176:[ 173:= 170:X 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale
André Caldas
talk
00:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Polish space
Polish space
http://www.math.chalmers.se/~serik/C-space.pdf
69.204.248.106
talk
20:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Malparti
talk
11:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Categories
C-Class mathematics articles
Low-priority mathematics articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.