Talk:Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

2849:

including gas heating and telephone, and anything, we have no check fraud cases here usually - did not hear from any such fraud in RL in my neighbourhood, it happens where banks try to sell their clients that bank wire is "expensive". Here, in EU, it is actually only a side action, most interesting are the letters coming with the telephone payments or rents or gas or the Lichtblick power company that I like a bit too much for such dollar frauds as I observed in the last time. I like this company a bit too much to give that away just like that. I want to place solar collectors in the sahara, too. Not only where I placed them but also in the sahara. And while I actually sometimes laugh about the diplomatical joke with the drone (I am not totally humour-less - "well... at least it does not fly..."), I am looking at the bill and saying that I do not want to pay for stuff I did not order. The money is needed somewhere else. What did you think? These jokes are payed with taxes. And now show me the next one, the joke with the "contract".

2830:

with how we work on solving it. We are damn loaded, this is important. We are loaded people. Absolutely unpredictable if anyone tries to put this idea into "reality". We do care and are sorry, we really think of the USA as of a very poor country. You have many, many many issues there. Trying to copy the issues here will, I think, not work. Let's see what I read when I open the newspaper tomorrow but we are armed. Not with weapons because this is a problem there, in your land. And simply just because we do not want to get this problem too (as of course weapon production lobbyists are HOT to get this "contract" running), we are ready to do -anything- necessary to prevent that. Resistance is reconnecting. Partisans are calling old colleagues, their children are alive. Their grandchildren are alive. We are preparing. We're sorry it will be against you this time, but we were left with no other options. --

1137:

becomes entitled to market value compensation, plus compound interest. It would allow free movement of business managers, and other employees of a corporation, for temporary work purposes among all countries party to the agreement. Article 57, under the present draft, indicates that public sector social security or state pensions could be required to be partially privatised, as it gives corporations a right to compete to provide the service. It is proposed to allow corporations to bring actions against governments for breach of its rights. If the Treaty is terminated, article 17 of the draft further provides that the Treaty's provisions continue in force for a further 20 years from the date investments are made.

2024:

Many of the sources which CFredkin seems not to object to are pure speculation; articles by journalists and predictions from proponents. In fact, the 'independent' CEPR is funded primarily by banks, to which the TTIP devotes various clauses - I won't object to this, since in the article it is presented in the context of "An economic assessment prepared by the Centre for Economic Policy Research", which goes just far enough to not present its opinions as fact. On the other hand, factual statements about the contents of the agreement, in the form that we presently know it, are (strongly) arguably far more reliable and verifiable, and CFredkin's blanket removal of so many is hardly justified.

2071:"The leaked text of the proposed treaty sets out limitations on the laws that any government can pass to regulate or publicly run various economic sectors, particularly insurance and banking, telecommunications, and postal services. Any corporation which is "expropriated" from its existing investments becomes entitled to market value compensation, plus compound interest. It would allow free movement of business managers and certain other workers among all signatory countries. It is proposed to allow corporations to bring actions against governments for breach of its rights." 3459:

problems occur - in Europe the main base(as with Brexit negotiations) are 4 values, including free movement of people. While in cases of Canada-Europe free trade the Europeans can easily visit Canada. In case of Europe-USA it is divided by countries, For example Poles(which have about 5 position by number of people in union) can't visit USA without visa. Without that, Poland can block TTIP in Europe, just because feeling angry of visas, and being afraid of lower prices of USA GMO food(the Poland have big food production for whole union).

163: 142: 2344:

attempt, in a few spare minutes, as a mere interested lay person), but stems from an intent to lazily manipulate opinion by ensuring certain sources are made less public, presumably out of a personal intent to see the TTIP ratified and accepted. If this truly is not the case, then I apologise, and suggest CFredkin make an attempt to modify his/her editing style to make this a less reasonable conclusion to draw, or risk appearing far more biased than he/she is! --

173: 1425:

without giving them time to provide references; consider adding a citation needed tag as an interim step. When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, please state your concern that there may not be a published reliable source for the content, and therefore it may not be verifiable. If you think the material is verifiable, try to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it.

505: 400: 484: 379: 3107:. All the quotes in the text are from reliable sources, represent major views on the topic, and in short, precise sentences summarize specific reliably sourced important points, that are described in the article body. You are free to add more content to reflect any views that you believe are missing in the lead, but be aware that blatantly deleting content about "Criticism and opposition" from the lead, without finding a 3396:

Americans face a mounting trade deficit and a devastated manufacturing base. With a lifetime of negotiating experience, the President understands how critical it is to put American workers and businesses first when it comes to trade. With tough and fair agreements, international trade can be used to grow our economy, return millions of jobs to America’s shores, and revitalize our nation’s suffering communities.

295: 274: 305: 410: 22: 2425:'s suggestions that they do not contain the cited information! In the case of the draft TTIP, they most certainly do! This was the point of my original extensive input on the massive blanket editing that was happening in this article; edit appropriately each contentious section rather than simply recklessly deleting it. Please NEVER compare me to the Daily Mail again. 3401:

NAFTA. In addition to rejecting and reworking failed trade deals, the United States will crack down on those nations that violate trade agreements and harm American workers in the process. The President will direct the Commerce Secretary to identify all trade violations and to use every tool at the federal government’s disposal to end these abuses.

74: 2388:

justification/motivation for the specific suggestions I've made is to create a more informative, balanced article. You can accuse me of bias if you like, but I don't think it would be true. I slightly object to the use of the word "cause", like that, although I understand what you mean. "conspiracy theory" is taking it a bit far, though!

53: 3175:

text: "ISDS first appeared in a bilateral trade agreement between Germany and Pakistan in 1959. The intention was to encourage foreign investment by protecting investors from discrimination or expropriation. But the implementation of this laudable idea has been disastrous. It has become so controversial that it threatens to scupper

2164:"Articles 51 to 59 set out limitations on the laws a government can pass to regulate or publicly run insurance and banking, and the section "Negotiations on Investor-State Dispute Settlement" proposes to allow corporations to bring action against governments for breach of its new rights and interests." 3217:

I have reinstated the quote on the very simple logic that (at least an early draft of) TTIP contains ISDS, that this article contains a section on ISDS, that The Economist quote is about ISDS and is highly relevant to the debate. Therefore whether or not The Economist article explicitly mentions TTIP

2810:

While I share your apparent concern about the TTIP, I find this sort of comment unhelpful: there is enough to keep track of in serious comments as it is, so do you think you could stick to straight discussion? It would also help if you could stick to English, as I suspect the German speakers are in a

1424:

Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be replaced without an inline citation to a reliable source. Whether and how quickly this should happen depends on the material and the overall state of the article. Editors might object if you remove material

1136:

The leaked text of the proposed treaty sets out limitations on the laws that any government can pass to regulate or publicly run various economic sectors, particularly insurance and banking, telecommunications, and postal services. Any corporation which is "expropriated" from its existing investments

1006:

could be required to be partially privatised, as it gives corporations a right to compete to provide the service. It is proposed to allow corporations to bring actions against governments for breach of its rights. If the Treaty is terminated, article 17 of the draft further provides that the Treaty's

997:

815:

What's with the pro-TTIP POV on this article? The intro regurgitates all the corporate/government propaganda, and doesn't even mention the core points of the widespread criticism against TTIP. A few select POV warriors appear to be very active here, reducing mention of the various criticisms with the

3400:

and making certain that any new trade deals are in the interests of American workers. President Trump is committed to renegotiating NAFTA. If our partners refuse a renegotiation that gives American workers a fair deal, then the President will give notice of the United States’ intent to withdraw from

2783:

Who is it? Is that guy editing in the wikipedia? Could you stand up please? What is your name? Your company? Show me your paper, honeybee. Have you counted the zeros? WHAT A PITY because the ZEROS are the only interesting detail in your - sheets. The only. Valuable information. Lots, really lots. of

1503:

If the content is not controversial, and there is a high likelihood that there are sources available to support it, by all means add the template. If the content is blatantly OR then you can go ahead and delete, but have the decency to explain on talk why you did that if you remove lareg portions of

1276:

As I see it, none of this was properly discussed. There was one of your reversions which did not contain references and I did not restore that. You need to explain what is wrong with individual references, and be specific. Knowledge (XXG) editors will not allow you to delete well referenced content.

3174:

I have already directed you to look at previous edits where this was discussed. This was, in fact, if you could be bothered to check, an edit-summary discussion between me and your very self. Since you are too lazy to do as I asked, and appear to have a faulty memory, here yet again is the relevant

2387:

P.s. In case you're interested, my justification/motivation for taking an interest is that how I see it, the TTIP discussions do not have enough transparency, and Knowledge (XXG) is exactly the kind of organisation which ought to PROMOTE the search for knowledge, if someone is embarking upon it. My

1208:

This article has a big problem with editorialising and opinion. If it us to be respected, it needs to stick to just the bare bones, fully sourced facts. For example, the lede declares that the EC invited comment on 'limited' clauses of the draft, but nowhere in the body is this clarified: it should

3351:

is quoted as making an assertion that the Treaty on the Functioning of the Union means that member states have no veto " if the international treaty was categorised as an exclusive treay.". I can find nothing in Article 3, section C to that says any such thing (it actually says that the Commission

2829:

Regarding language: usually I respect, but in THIS topic this is necessary. This "contract" is trying to put us into the same middle ages that some of those united states are, we know that, we do care and watch. We know how landscapes do look like after certain actions and wish not to be disturbed

2023:

can only be motivated by a desire to see this document go hidden. (i.e. censorship.) The justification for it can only be based on the source, which, given the (objective) relative confidentiality/secrecy of the negotiations, must be surely one of the most reliable primary sources we are privy to!

1706:

That's not how it works. These groups are notable and their own websites are reliable sources for the expression of their own views. They are not reliable sources for unbiased news, but that's not how they're being used. We can use a well-known person or group's own site to source their own ideas.

1391:

is one of the key policies of this project. It's totally unacceptable for you to restore content which is not sourced, without providing sources yourself. Your repeated insistence that I should be responsible for providing sources for content posted by other editors is ridiculous and is the very

1322:

There's no reference to transparency in the context of the following quote from the source: Given this lack of transparency, “it’s quite remarkable that in the United States there is no organised political opposition to TTIP”, argued the Director of the Center for Transatlantic Relations at Johns

624:

I'm reposting the content written by Raoul Marc Jennar for this wikipedia article, I would understand that the lack of sources posed a problem if it was particularly controversial but it is not. It is better to have an article with some content htan without IMHO. It is not clear to me whether User

2853:

There is no need for this contract, cooperation exists and works. Some companies like Amazon are whining. Pffff - and? Let them whine. "buuhuhuhuhh they have a Betriebsrat, we'll try to kill them with our legal department, we're trying as much as we can, but this is SOOOOO EXPENSIVE, buhuhuh they

1329:

If the following is significant, it should be possible to find a reliable secondary source which mentions it: Germany oppositon to the TTIP from the electorate has been growing with a number of petitions to the Bundestag. The negotiations and German ratification were postponed as reaction to the

998:

773:

be covered in a secondary source" might tend to mask the very existence of debate, which I'm confident is not what we're trying to do here. When we find such a secondary source for these items, we will doubtless gain a better perspective on the arguments. In the meantime, I suggest we retain KF

577:

I've moved the section Benefits of TTIP to become a subsection of Criticism. After all, criticism covers both positive and negative claims. If people disagree with this move, I suggest my change be reverted, but the headline "Harms of TTIP" be used instead of Criticism so that it contrasts nicely

3244:

of standards -rather than say having products with higher standards (in this case EU products) be allowed on one market (US market in this example) but not vice versa-, despite the obvious difference in standards (the EU's being much higher than the US's at least on this issue). According to the

2278:

has halted in many signatory countries in response to public outcry" seems a fairly brutal tactic. Surely one of the joys of Knowledge (XXG) is the endless pursuit of knowledge it enables, and removing a link to another article, presumably subject to the same rigour CFredkin insists so nobly on,

3458:

One of the background was lost of the Europe and USA domination to China. TTIP will create market that can compete with Chinese growth. Protests against TTIP may be funded by China, because China is spending big amount of money to put the single countries into their economic orbit. However many

2406:

important topic, so it is critical that the content not be open to accusations of bias. For this reason, the content must be sourced with absolute rigour. Adding material with a citation, only for that material not actually to be in the citation, is the worst crime in the book - the word 'bias'

2343:

Finally, I'd like to step outside of discussing the rigour and reliability of this article and ask CFredkin to consider his/her motivation for these edits. I put forward the hypothesis that it is not out of an intent to increase rigour (which I have just, in a CONSTRUCTIVE manner, undertaken to

3395:

For too long, Americans have been forced to accept trade deals that put the interests of insiders and the Washington elite over the hard-working men and women of this country. As a result, blue-collar towns and cities have watched their factories close and good-paying jobs move overseas, while

3285:

The difference between the 2 is that mutual recognition would allow products officially allowed in europe to be sold in the USA and vice versa. Harmonization means that neither labelling is used, but rather a new label is used for both. The problem I think is that in most instances, the lowest

2158:

4) Changing "Articles 51 to 59 set out limitations on the laws that any government can pass to regulate or publicly run insurance and banking. Any regulations that do not fall within the Treaty's terms and objectives would be unlawful." to "It is proposed to allow corporations to bring actions

1863:

8) The following statement is not supported by the source provided: Given this lack of transparency, “it’s quite remarkable that in the United States there is no organised political opposition to TTIP”, argued the Director of the Center for Transatlantic Relations at Johns Hopkins University.

2087:

of the proposed treaty sets out limitations on the laws that any government can pass to regulate or publicly run various economic sectors, particularly insurance and banking, telecommunications, and postal services. Any corporation which is "expropriated" from its existing investments becomes

1369:

template and look for these sources and add them, or let others find them if you are too lazy to do it yourself. Unless there are blatant transgressions of Knowledge (XXG) editin policies, which is not the case here, don't go around just deleting content that editors have worked hard to add.

2848:

There is simply no need for this contract. No matter what lobbyists are trying to sell as their needs - cooperation on business level between USA and EU works just fine. Help their banks to return to a normal civilized working process, free bank wire payments (that is how money is sent here,

796:"MeatAtlas" about “Free trade versus safe food”. It includes differnet takes on policy "The European Union bases its safety rules for food and chemicals on the “precautionary principle”…. The United States states that it makes decisions based on “sound science” and cost-benefit analysis… " 2913:

You were waiting for it to be challenged? Why did you knowingly add misleading content if you knew it would be challenged? Why do you believe that distorted, cherrypicked text is the only absolutely inviolable part of the article? I recognise that some people are angry about TTIP, but this

2980:“…The big concern is that foreign companies - including predatory US healthcare companies - would be able to demand that the NHS be opened up to them. The European Commission is adamant that the NHS can be exempted from the proposals, but it's hard to be sure until it's tested in court…” 2088:

entitled to market value compensation, plus compound interest. It would allow free movement of business managers and certain other workers among all signatory countries. It contains proposals to allow corporations to bring actions against governments for breach of any of these new rights."

2732:"Karel De Gucht responded to criticism in a Guardian article in December 2013, saying "The commission has regularly consulted a broad range of civil society organisations in writing and in person, and our most recent meeting had 350 participants from trade unions, NGOs and business"." 3422:

Yes I know Express is questionable, but all signs and the update of the White House articles point to the inforomation of Trump wanting to also quit TTIP as valid, although worth a part in the talk page, not clear enough yet to also implement in the actual wiki page (except for TPP)

3043:

please stop adding cherry-picked quotes and references to a petition, which is only mentioned in passing in the source provided, to the lead of the article. And the claim that the agreement has been criticized by "a wide variety of NGO's and activists" isn't supported by the source

1834:

3) The following statement is WP:original research: The leaked text of the proposed treaty sets out limitations on the laws that any government can pass to regulate or publicly run various economic sectors, particularly insurance and banking, telecommunications, and postal services.

1234:

After his reversions of my edits, I checked back through the history of this page to find that the user has been taking out additions by many editors that have put in either factual information or reports of criticism. This is concerning, and suggests an issue could exist over

3286:

standard label is used as the standard, in both regions, rather than using the highest standard of the 2, and excluding the sale of the lower standard products in the other region. This may not always be necessary, but on the issue of pesticides, ... it certainly is.

2694:

Personally, in order to prevent the article from becoming a collection of opinions on the agreement (which it appears to be at risk of at this point), I think we should consider only including statements which are significant enough to be referenced by secondary

1072:

reads "Nothing in this Title shall be construed to prevent a Party, including its public entities, from exclusively conducting or providing in its territory activities or services forming part of a public retirement plan or statutory system of social security,

1887:— a public statement from a ranking State Department official that the U.S. government considers the TTIP a "companion piece" to the TPP. You are correct that it is not currently being negotiated under a fast-track authority, and I have removed that section. 3352:

negotiates free trade agreements on behalf of the Union, but such agreements still need to be ratified - or not). If he had written such poppycock as a wikipedia editor, it would be buried under a hail of 'fact' tags. IMO, this single sourced section fails

1994:, to just keep putting back the disputed material without having dealt with the issues raised above is utterly pointless. In Knowledge (XXG), unsupported material is removed without further ado, and that is what will continue to happen here. Please read the 849:

Knowledge (XXG) should be presenting both sides of the arguments, as used by typical representatives; to quote criticisms is not “to align this article” with them and a worse “opposite of neutrality” is presenting only one side. Nothing wrong with using

3391:

After President Donald Trump's inauguration in 2017 the White House removed all links and mentions of TTIP only two hours after he was sworn in as president. In the official White House statement still mentioning trade deals the following is written:

2000:

No one here is in the business of 'censorship' as you call it but rather we want to see an article that inspires confidence that it is properly researched and well-founded. It won't do that if it contains opinion or partial reporting of the sources.

3182:

Tell me: what is the name of the trade deal that the European Union is negotiating with America? As I said, you yourself tried to remove this quote before, and under the same pretext. Rather suspicious? Please, do not waste my time with this again.

1820:

File:European Union United States Locator.svg|thumb|right|450px|The proposed agreement TTIP between the EU and the US, includes provisions to increase economic freedom for corporations, and allow them to sue governments for passing non-compliant

1686:

The references in the article to Public Citizen, Electronic Frontier Foundation, ACTA Blog, and CorporateEurope.org are all references to these community groups' opinions in criticising TTIP. They are therefore useful, and clearly referenced as

2675:)” and “(Polemic, posted on a blog...)”. The IMP is, according to our article on it, a well-respected, the report is on its site, not in a blog and polemic is in the eye of the beholder until proven. I could see no respect in which it failed 1829:

The TTIP is a companion agreement to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which is also being negotiated by the US government under "fast track" trade promotion authority. This, and the EU's practices, allows the trade negotiations to continue in

1867:

9) The following statement is unsourced and potentially inaccurate: If the Treaty is terminated, article 17 of the draft further provides that the Treaty's provisions continue in force for a further 20 years from the date investments are

3255:

Appearantly, the reason for the revert was the source cited wasn't a good one, which I can relate to, but not saying anything about the issue of mutual recognition (on behalf of pesticide use, ...) seems to be a loss for the article.

1163:: The leaked text of the proposed treaty sets out limitations on the laws that any government can pass to regulate or publicly run various economic sectors, particularly insurance and banking, telecommunications, and postal services. 3098:

There are currently four paragraphs in the lead, summarizing four largest sections of the article: "Proposed contents", "Negotiations", "Benefits of TTIP" and "Criticism and opposition" in a balanced and neutral manner, according to

1348:

Your editing behavior is unacceptable. If there are sections that require improvements, then work to improve them. If there are sections that need copy-editing, then copy edit. If there are sections that require sources, then add a

2105:

Have you read the source? I don't know how to make it have a nice link like in the main page, but you can see the text of the references in the edit text for this discussion page, which list the relevant articles in the document.

1838:

4) There is no reference to "compound interest" in source for the following statement: Any corporation which is "expropriated" from its existing investments becomes entitled to market value compensation, plus compound interest.

1166:

There is no reference to "compound interest" in source for the following statement: Any corporation which is "expropriated" from its existing investments becomes entitled to market value compensation, plus compound interest.

902:. I indicated that a couple of the edits I reverted were intermediate and that I would restore them later. However the intermediate edits were to content which were themselves reverted, so I was unable to restore them. 765:

As it says: "The goal is only that the person could compare the primary source with the material in the Knowledge (XXG) article, and agree that the primary source actually, directly says just what we're saying it does."

2030:

1) The first edit, removing: "The proposed agreement TTIP between the EU and the US, includes provisions to increase economic freedom for corporations, and allow them to sue governments for passing non-compliant laws."

1123:. This, and the EU's practices, allows the trade negotiations to continue in secret. After a proposed draft was leaked, in March 2014 the European Commission launched a public consultation on a limited set of clauses. 994:

This, and the EU's practices, allows the trade negotiations to continue in secret. After a proposed draft was leaked, in March 2014 the European Commission launched a public consultation on a limited set of clauses.

1145:: Article 57, under the present draft, indicates that public sector social security or state pensions could be required to be partially privatised, as it gives corporations a right to compete to provide the service. 597:

In the table "Trade between the EU and the US (in € bn.)" in the section "Background" the numbers in the row "US to EU" do not add up. 128+180+5=313 and NOT 452! I do not have references to correct these numbers.

1842:

5) The following statement is WP:original research: It would allow free movement of business managers, and other employees of a corporation, for temporary work purposes among all countries party to the agreement.

3067:

states that the lead should summarize the article "including any prominent controversies". You remove all content about criticism and opposition from the lead without any compromise, which clearly is violating

1968:

specifically, saying 'you keep raising the same issues' is NOT an acceptable reason on wp for edit-warring. You MUST respond point by point to the rfc in this talk page. Otherwise the editwar gets escalated.

1713:

Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party

1562:

This is not a BLP in which the burden is on the editor wanting to add or restore content. So, in this article the burden is on you to justify massive deletion of content which was worked on previously.

2202:

1) Changing "The growth of the EU's economic power has led to" to "There are" is not wrong, but it seems quite petty. I have no strong preference, but the shorter one seems potentially more objective.

2407:

doesn't even begin to cover it - because it cuts at the heart of the founding principles of Knowledge (XXG). If you want to write like that, go get a job at the National Enquirer or the Daily Mail. --

2213:

Given this lack of transparency, "it’s quite remarkable that in the United States there is no organised political opposition to TTIP", argued the Director of the Center for Transatlantic Relations at

2305:

You haven't addressed the fact that it is related. Correct; this article is about TTIP. Knowledge (XXG) cleverly uses inline links between related articles to better enable discovery and learning.

3014:

What is the current state of negotiations, and what is the timeframe envisioned by the negotiators? The article still states "The negotiators hope to conclude their work by the end of 2015".

124: 2123:

3) Deletion of this statement: "Under article 14, any corporation which is "expropriated" from its existing investments becomes entitled to market value compensation" which is simply true.

3544: 3524: 579: 114: 1075:

except when those activities may be carried out, as provided by the Party's domestic regulation, by financial service suppliers in competition with public entities or private institutions

203: 1939:

has never addressed the points outlined above, despite the fact that they were the subject of an RfC that was open for a month. However he/she continues to edit war over this content.

2760:

What I loved most was the joke with the missing cancellation AND withdrawal clause and calling it a "contract". I LOVE SUCH JOKES. Yes, sure, go on, please, mr. send me your claim.

3529: 1825:

2) The following statement is not only unsourced, but factually inaccurate. The TTIP is not being negotiated under fast track authority and is not a companion agreement to TPP:

220: 90: 2486: 1459:, Thanks for the excerpt. It confirms my point. Here's a question for you: If I add contentious unsourced material to an article, will you agree to 1) not remove it, 2) add 1128:

If the Treaty is terminated, article 17 of the draft further provides that the Treaty's provisions continue in force for a further 20 years from the date investments are made.

1177:

The following statement is redundant with existing content in the article: It is proposed to allow corporations to bring actions against governments for breach of its rights.

3059:

All content in the lead that you deleted is completely backed by the "Criticism and opposition" section, which is one of the largest sections of the article. If you label a

1763:

Overall this article DOES need work, but not mass deletions. It needs most of all analysis of its contents and then a summary of different groups informed opinions on it.

2235:

I think that presents it as opinion rather than necessarily fact, and I can not envisage any objections to the source itself, although please enlighten me if I am wrong.

361: 3519: 256: 961:

Just so other users know, this is the content, and the sources are there in the draft text. It's amazing that this article said nothing of the content of the Treaty.

81: 58: 3559: 351: 1174:: It would allow free movement of business managers, and other employees of a corporation, for temporary work purposes among all countries party to the agreement. 3539: 246: 2181:

I don't understand what your question is - "Where exactly..." It is in articles 51 to 59, and in the section "Negotiations on Investor-State Dispute Settlement"

210: 2091:

Where exactly does the above text appear in the source provided? When referencing a primary source, care needs to be taken that no interpretation is attempted.

2230:

has argued that given the perceived lack of transparency, "it’s quite remarkable that in the United States there is no organised political opposition to TTIP",

466: 3564: 1846:

6) The following is not relevant to this article: ....the ratification of which (ACTA) has halted in many signatory countries in response to public outcry.

1759:

For the John Hopkins Uni quote, I'm really agnostic myself - if you want to change the sentence, that's fine, but again, you shouldn't simply delete things.

1236: 761:, and a Primary Source does seem suitable to document (without analysis or ]) the existence of significant criticism from a range of academic sources, say. 327: 3549: 3026: 1326:

The following is not relevant to this article: ....the ratification of which (ACTA) has halted in many signatory countries in response to public outcry.

694:

I'm not sure I agree about "In These Times". However, the quote does not warrant the dramatic formatting. Also s2bnetwork.org is not a reliable source.

215: 3574: 3270:

Here are a few more sources which make it clear that the mutual recognition and harmonization are important differences and a problematic issue in TTIP:

1191:

This stuff should be in the lead because it is important. Also, your claims of original research are basically nitpicking, the sources cover everything.

456: 1776: 1627: 1542: 1342: 1252: 769:

When dealing with fairly abtruse details of treaty negotiations, which are not particularly widely (or even well) treated in the press, a criterion of "

1738:

I added a reference about the German petition - you were right to raise this, but you could have found the reference yourself rather than deleting it.

649: 555: 3554: 644:

Some of the content in this section is sourced to "consumersinternational.org' and 'In These Times'. These are not reliable sources of content per

2598: 2572: 1115:, which prohibits restrictions by the US and countries in Europe on the economic freedom of corporations. The TTIP is a companion agreement to the 3589: 3579: 3534: 625:

CFredkin is a reliable author or whether (s)he is biased though I do not think (s)he is a newby like me. Hence I am ignoring her or his changes.--

545: 1716:

The EFF and Public Citizen, at the very least, are well-established experts on these issues. The section you removed also contains a citation to

432: 318: 279: 2255:

I think you are right. I apologise. This is still a useful and credible source, so I recommend finding some way of working it into the article.

3274: 3022: 186: 147: 1209:

be deleted. . The facts can stand for themselves: I for one don't like being manipulated by selective reporting or being told what to think.

2205:

2) Another minor change of wording mentioning the nature of the average taken by sharing "equally among the populace" seems sensible to me.

872:

I agree that criticism should be given due weight. If Monbiot has a justifiable argument that's relevant nothing wrong with mentioning it.

2792:

find him. He'll have bad luck as mighty and al will be both busy and not in the mood to help him out of the drama he will find himself in.

710: 605: 3594: 3569: 2994: 2987:

And yet, the Knowledge (XXG) article does not have a section on the way TTIP could undermine the British National Health Service. WHY?

2285: 2275: 1192: 817: 3475: 521: 3424: 2373:

No accusation - I'm just interested in justification. Do you have any input on the content of the article and my suggestions? Thanks,

1647:

Sorry man, I will not engage while you edit war; it's a waste of my time. If you want to discuss, self-revert and then we can engage.

198: 423: 384: 3439: 583: 1416:

to unsourced content and give others the chance to find sources if you don't want to be bothered by doing it yourself. Read again

3404:

As such, the Trans-Pacific Partnership article can already be updated, while the TTIP situation still awaits more clarification.

2811:

minority among the editors, and more so among the the passive users. I hope I am right in assuming that the mass of empty lines (

194:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

3584: 3361: 3223: 2412: 2006: 1974: 1959: 1910: 1217: 3332: 3081: 1995: 1954:

and consequently I've reverted his/her latest changes. There is a way on wp to resolve disputes and edit-warring is not it. --

33: 3073: 2903: 2865: 2835: 2800: 2746: 1171: 1160: 1142: 512: 489: 2942: 2965: 2769:

Fünfjahresplan, ich gebe euch was. I thought Bologna 1999 was the best 5 years plan I ever have seen in my life, I never.

1892: 1725: 1010: 415: 3080:, with a major impact on EU decision making. If you blatantly remove the sourced content again, you will be reported for 990: 3376: 3310: 2658: 2359:

Accusing other editors of bias is really not going to help your cause. Don't expand the conspiracy theory even further.

854:

for one side: he may argue with feeling, but he argues carefully and coherently, appears in a well regarded newspaper (

2914:

encyclopædia article should reflect what reliable sources say - without putting undue weight on editorials, either.

3357: 3219: 2408: 2002: 1970: 1955: 1906: 1213: 3505: 3432: 3380: 3365: 3314: 3295: 3265: 3227: 3209: 3192: 3168: 3134: 3120: 3093: 3053: 3030: 3002: 2923: 2907: 2869: 2839: 2824: 2804: 2750: 2718: 2704: 2688: 2434: 2416: 2397: 2382: 2368: 2353: 2337: 2314: 2300: 2264: 2250: 2190: 2176: 2150: 2136: 2115: 2100: 2058: 2044: 2010: 1978: 1963: 1948: 1931: 1914: 1896: 1877: 1858: 1811: 1791: 1752: 1729: 1701: 1670: 1656: 1642: 1633:

Sorry, I don't understand what you're saying. Also, my comments on the content span the previous section as well.

1594: 1572: 1557: 1513: 1478: 1435: 1401: 1388: 1379: 1290: 1267: 1221: 1200: 1186: 1154: 974: 948: 930: 911: 899: 881: 867: 844: 825: 805: 783: 758: 732: 718: 703: 688: 661: 634: 613: 587: 2899: 2861: 2831: 2796: 2742: 2430: 2393: 2378: 2349: 2310: 2260: 2186: 2146: 2111: 2054: 1120: 1116: 2227: 2214: 1905:

above. Let's let the facts speak for themselves; leave the opinions to notable outsiders. CFredkin is right. --

1888: 1721: 1463: 1410: 1392:

epitome of moral hazard. In addition, you didn't bother to respond to the specific issues that I posted above.

3416: 714: 630: 609: 39: 2998: 2559: 2545: 2531: 2517: 2502: 2478: 2461: 1196: 1086: 1069: 1058: 1047: 1036: 1025: 821: 3428: 3372: 3306: 3275:

https://www.kan.de/en/publications/kanbrief/115/ttip-gegenseitige-anerkennung-von-normen-als-moeglicher-weg/

86: 3443: 2990: 601: 3188: 3076:

is not some random petition, it is an official EU tool that enables the public to propose policies to the

2426: 2389: 2374: 2345: 2306: 2256: 2182: 2142: 2107: 2050: 684: 3108: 626: 877: 801: 779: 750: 520:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

431:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

326:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

310: 89:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1302: 645: 3245:

Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD), this is the main reason on why the environment would suffer."

2884:

is what I have been waiting for to have confirmed what I have been absolutely sure about and expecting

2773:

Expected to be that suprised once in my life. (Because I made an expensive bet that Bologna 1999 was

178: 3476:

https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/foreign-policy/312613-transatlantic-trade-is-china-in-or-out

1849:

7) The source provided for the content in the Transparency section makes no mention of transparency.

1708: 1692:

I said above that these sources are not reliable due to lack of editorial control and fact checking.

648:(see section on Questionable Sources.) If you would like to include them, please seek consensus at 21: 3116: 3089: 2919: 2763:

Feel free to do so, I am waiting, as I know as well as you know that they are ready and prepared.

2714: 2364: 1301:

The following sources have no indication of editorial control or fact-checking and as such are not

1258:

The content you restored was discussed above. Please engage there to justify restoration. Thanks.

840: 797: 753:'s contribution of two sources to the Criticism section. While Secondary Sources may be preferred, 3501: 3241: 3205: 3164: 3130: 3077: 3049: 2820: 2700: 2684: 2333: 2296: 2246: 2172: 2132: 2096: 2040: 1944: 1927: 1873: 1854: 1807: 1787: 1748: 1697: 1666: 1638: 1590: 1553: 1474: 1397: 1338: 1333:

The source provided for the content in the Transparency section makes no mention of transparency.

1263: 1182: 1150: 944: 907: 863: 728: 699: 657: 162: 141: 2958:

So - while Karel claims to "consulted" a "broad range of civil" (and THOSE very secret, too),

2485:

The named reference "keionline.org" was defined multiple times with different content (see the

1922:

Since there has been no response to any (but #2 above) for over a month, I'll edit accordingly.

3197: 3184: 3152: 2324:

5) I have no idea what the objection to the middle of the paragraph about Koskenniemi can be.

1802:

Comment requested on alleged issues with original research and inaccurate content in article.

1652: 1623: 1568: 1509: 1431: 1375: 917:

The source is the TEXT OF THE PROPOSED TREATY itself. Do not delete well referenced material.

680: 3100: 3064: 832: 2076:

In my opinion, a pedantic objection could be raised to the wording, in which case I propose:

873: 775: 3069: 3411: 999: 3353: 3302: 3060: 2894:

Additionally, a confirmed percentage of 97% citizen in Europe are reportedly against TTIP

2676: 2672: 1212:

Any comments cited should be those of people notable in their own right. Ref wp:undue. --

3218:

is irrelevant and certainly not a justification to remove cited and relevant content. --

3017:

What is the expected time frame for the ratification process? Will there be a deadline?

2943:

http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wirtschaft/buergerbefragung-zu-ttip-prozent-dagegen-1.2302201

2208:

3) Rather than (once again) utterly striking a perceived offending source from existence

1884: 1007:

provisions continue in force for a further 20 years from the date investments are made.

3496:

Perhaps someone can salvage some of it, but as it stands it seems too poor to include.

3291: 3261: 3112: 3085: 3040: 2915: 2710: 2662: 2627: 2360: 1108: 851: 836: 668: 323: 3105:"all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic" 2982:

What is TTIP? Everything you need to know about the trade deal causing chaos in the EU

2671:. I feel that he did not provide sufficent justification, saying respectively “(fails 1661:

So far, no one has responded to my specific comments in this and the previous section.

1417: 831:

It would be unhelpful to align this article with polemicists like Monbiot. That's not

3513: 3497: 3201: 3160: 3126: 3045: 2816: 2696: 2680: 2422: 2329: 2292: 2242: 2168: 2128: 2092: 2036: 1940: 1923: 1869: 1850: 1803: 1783: 1782:

You still haven't addressed the bulk of my comments in this and the previous section.

1744: 1693: 1662: 1634: 1586: 1549: 1470: 1393: 1363: 1334: 1298:

You still haven't addressed my comments in the previous section above. In addition,

1259: 1178: 1146: 1112: 1003: 940: 903: 859: 746: 724: 695: 653: 191: 504: 483: 2623: 1991: 1936: 1770: 1765: 1648: 1619: 1564: 1548:

You have not addressed the issues specified above regarding the content in dispute.

1536: 1531: 1505: 1456: 1427: 1371: 1284: 1279: 1246: 1241: 968: 963: 924: 919: 895: 855: 399: 378: 3486: 2159:

against governments for breach of its rights." is picky. I suggest a more neutral

2784:

Zeros. In trousers and skirts. Secretly talking about how to screw people over.

1353: 2599:""Obama sees EU-US free trade agreement as legacy issue", says Daniel Hamilton" 2573:""Obama sees EU-US free trade agreement as legacy issue", says Daniel Hamilton" 3371:

Thanks for highlighting this - could you link to this so others can check it?

3348: 2815:) after your signature was a slip of the editor, and therefore removing them. 2737: 2632: 675: 405: 300: 168: 2857:

WELL. Live with that. Amazon. Or be surprised about the newspaper tomorrow.

3287: 3257: 428: 294: 273: 3417:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/756970/donald-trump-ttip-eu-white-house

3347:

In the section 'Ratification', sub-section 'Veto powers', "British writer"

190:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 3063:

content from an entire section as POV, you clearly are having a POV view.

2027:

Here are the cases where the content was very much present in the source:

409: 2888:

No. If any sentence was not to be touched in this article, it was this.

2083: 1119:, which is also being negotiated by the US government under "fast track" 898:

which included unsourced statements. All statements must be sourced for

723:

There's a reliable sources noticeboard where consensus can be determined.

2328:

Once again, the deleted content is not included in the source provided.

2241:

Once again, there is no mention of transparency in the source provided.

1277:

But also, as I indicate, your pattern of behaviour is very concerning.

1103:(TTIP; also known as the Transatlantic Free Trade Area, abbreviated as 858:) and takes the trouble to source as much as he can (on his own site). 794: 3398:

This strategy starts by withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership

2788:

I make another bet now: of course they edit in the wiki. Of course. I

3305:, can you find a newspaper article that agrees with your statements? 3200:: Please provide the diff of our previous discussion on this content. 2709:

I'd agree with CFredkin. Oh, and if Wordpress isn't a blog, what is?

2288:

has halted in many signatory countries in response to public outcry"

673:

while left-leaning, qualifies as a reliable source. It is similar to

2017:

Regarding the 2872 bytes-worth of edit that is being wrangled over:

1717: 517: 3279: 3446:) Tendentious and poorly written, though possibly in good faith. 73: 52: 3177:

trade deals the European Union is negotiating with both America

1087:

TTIP Draft, "Negotiations on Investor-State Dispute Settlement"

774:

Kaltenborn's additions while improving them where necessary. -

2945:

Süddeutsche Zeitung: 97 Prozent sind dagegen. January 13, 2015

2141:"Under article 14"! This is almost a word-for-word quotation! 987: 15: 2891:

So let's take that sentence to the next level. To the talk.

2555: 2553: 2527: 2525: 2513: 2511: 3240:"In 2014, the main negotiator (Karel De Gucht) insisted on 3155:: Please paste below the specific text from the source for 2167:

Where exactly does this text appear in the source provided?

2127:

Where exactly does this text appear in the source provided?

2035:

Where exactly does this text appear in the source provided?

3387:

USA pulling out of partnership deal is of high possibility

3111:

on a neutral wording, is against Knowledge (XXG) policy.--

2226:

The Director of the Center for Transatlantic Relations at

2541: 2539: 1132:

In addition, why does this paragraph belong in the lede:

1095:

I don't believe any of the following content is sourced:

1618:

So, you can simply copy edit and attribute these views.

322:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 3451: 3412:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/america-first-foreign-policy

3249: 3156: 2883: 2669: 2666: 2505:

and "Negotiations on Investor-State Dispute Settlement"

2464:

and "Negotiations on Investor-State Dispute Settlement"

1529:

Again, I see a mass deletion, which is not acceptable.

2781:

SO. I heard I already owe someone in the USA some MRD?

3301:

I'm not sure that either of those two would count as

749:

may have been a little hasty in completely reverting

939:

The edits included statements that were not sourced.

516:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 427:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1230:

User:CFredkin's apparent censorship of this article

1229: 99:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject International relations

2786:The guy should watch out, I will stumble over him. 2657:I have restored two references to a report by the 1998:policy and then decide how you want to go forward. 2875:Confirmed percentage of 97 Percent are against it 1469:, and 3) defend it from removal by other editors? 3545:C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance 3525:High-importance International relations articles 2628:"How the European Internet rose up against ACTA" 3356:and should be deleted. Can anyone defend it? -- 3125:Ok, your current version is much more balanced. 2474: 2472: 2470: 1237:Conflict-of-interest editing on Knowledge (XXG) 3487:https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-33655318 1101:Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership 8: 3530:WikiProject International relations articles 1720:, which is an indisputable reliable source. 102:Template:WikiProject International relations 1816:1) The following tag is original research: 755:"Primary" is not another way to spell "bad" 2988: 793:There’s a chapter in a publication called 599: 478: 373: 336:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject European Union 268: 136: 47: 2421:Please read the sources before accepting 1608:Electronic Frontier Foundation is a WP:RS 763:Primary sources may be used... with care. 231:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States 3520:C-Class International relations articles 1330:widespread opposition in this petition. 3468: 3325: 2934: 2653:References to Bulgarian report restored 2453: 1504:the article without seeking consensus. 1018: 578:(and fairly) with the other headline.-- 480: 375: 270: 138: 49: 19: 3560:Mid-importance European Union articles 2775:"the best 5 yrs plan I ever have seen" 1420:and become familiar with the process: 1107:) is a proposed agreement between the 789:Source on "food safety vs. free trade" 709:Who decides which source is reliable? 3540:Mid-importance United States articles 2766:The claims do even have a timeline. 1798:Re-iterating issues with this article 1675:So to respond to each of your points: 441:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Economics 7: 2020:Removing any reference whatsoever to 1709:the policy on self-published sources 510:This article is within the scope of 421:This article is within the scope of 316:This article is within the scope of 184:This article is within the scope of 79:This article is within the scope of 3565:WikiProject European Union articles 2961:the people were actually watching. 2481: 1901:I reiterate what I wrote (late) in 580:2001:984:5CB7:1:DC70:3AEA:DDB0:EFB4 339:Template:WikiProject European Union 82:WikiProject International relations 38:It is of interest to the following 3550:WikiProject United States articles 234:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 3575:Mid-importance Economics articles 3237:Following addition was reverted: 3023:The very model of a minor general 1141:Also, the following statement is 530:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Trade 2984:, Mirror (on-line) 11 Jun 2015 894:I reverted a number of edits by 503: 482: 408: 398: 377: 303: 293: 272: 171: 161: 140: 105:International relations articles 72: 51: 20: 3555:C-Class European Union articles 2597:Daniel Hamilton (31 May 2012). 2571:Daniel Hamilton (31 May 2012). 2291:This article is not about ACTA. 2274:4) Once again, removal of "the 650:WP:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard 550:This article has been rated as 461:This article has been rated as 356:This article has been rated as 251:This article has been rated as 119:This article has been rated as 3590:High-importance Trade articles 3580:WikiProject Economics articles 3535:C-Class United States articles 3450:I have reverted the following 3280:http://ecostandard.org/?p=2715 3159:that references TTIP. Thanks. 3003:22:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC) 2738:Ah, yeah? Tell us more, Karel. 2279:merely lessens that. I propose 1614:CorporateEurope.org is a WP:RS 1585:I have. See my comments above. 1312:Electronic Frontier Foundation 620:Content from Raoul Marc Jennar 444:Template:WikiProject Economics 1: 3103:representing proportionately 3074:European Citizens' Initiative 2756:personnel comment (one line.) 524:and see a list of open tasks. 435:and see a list of open tasks. 416:Business and economics portal 330:and see a list of open tasks. 93:and see a list of open tasks. 3438:Undid revision 886640950 by 3433:12:28, 21 January 2017 (UTC) 3135:17:01, 3 February 2016 (UTC) 3121:06:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC) 3094:04:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC) 3054:17:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC) 3031:11:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC) 2924:18:39, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 2908:09:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 2870:03:11, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 2840:02:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 2825:01:24, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 2805:00:35, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 2751:00:21, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 2719:01:49, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 2705:23:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 2689:23:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 2659:Institute of Modern Politics 2200:Regarding the other changes: 1883:As to 2), I have rewrote to 816:flimsiest justifications. -- 806:11:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC) 733:17:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC) 719:05:25, 13 January 2014 (UTC) 704:00:44, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 689:00:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 662:23:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 640:Content in Criticism Section 1604:If material is attributed: 1170:The following statement is 1159:The following statement is 588:12:38, 5 October 2015 (UTC) 3611: 3595:WikiProject Trade articles 3570:C-Class Economics articles 2560:TTIP Draft, articles 24-28 2532:TTIP Draft, articles 35-39 2518:TTIP Draft, articles 51-59 2503:TTIP Draft, articles 24-59 2462:TTIP Draft, articles 24-59 1514:20:54, 27 April 2014 (UTC) 1479:17:39, 27 April 2014 (UTC) 1436:14:18, 27 April 2014 (UTC) 1406:For Pete's sake, just add 1402:01:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC) 1380:00:28, 27 April 2014 (UTC) 1343:19:00, 26 April 2014 (UTC) 1291:18:14, 26 April 2014 (UTC) 1268:18:06, 26 April 2014 (UTC) 1253:17:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC) 1187:19:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC) 1155:19:24, 26 April 2014 (UTC) 1059:TTIP Draft, articles 24-28 1037:TTIP Draft, articles 35-39 1026:TTIP Draft, articles 51-59 975:17:36, 26 April 2014 (UTC) 949:17:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC) 931:17:21, 26 April 2014 (UTC) 912:16:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC) 882:18:44, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 868:18:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 845:11:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 826:07:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 556:project's importance scale 533:Template:WikiProject Trade 467:project's importance scale 362:project's importance scale 319:WikiProject European Union 257:project's importance scale 125:project's importance scale 3506:21:00, 7 March 2019 (UTC) 3381:22:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC) 3366:20:29, 22 June 2016 (UTC) 3315:09:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC) 3296:12:59, 18 June 2016 (UTC) 3266:12:40, 18 June 2016 (UTC) 2417:20:27, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 2398:19:07, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 2383:19:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 2369:11:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 2354:00:52, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 2338:19:33, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 2301:19:33, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 2251:19:33, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 2177:19:28, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 2137:19:28, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 2101:19:28, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 2066:2) The removed paragraph: 2045:19:28, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 2011:19:45, 21 June 2014 (UTC) 1979:22:44, 20 June 2014 (UTC) 1964:22:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC) 1949:20:37, 20 June 2014 (UTC) 1121:trade promotion authority 1117:Trans-Pacific Partnership 635:14:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 614:08:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC) 549: 498: 460: 393: 355: 288: 250: 187:WikiProject United States 156: 118: 67: 46: 3333:TTIP: mutual recognition 2727:"Responses to criticism" 2435:14:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 2315:14:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 2265:14:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 2228:Johns Hopkins University 2215:Johns Hopkins University 2191:14:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 2151:14:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 2116:14:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 2059:14:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 1932:16:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC) 192:United States of America 3228:11:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC) 3210:19:10, 2 May 2016 (UTC) 3193:18:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC) 3169:18:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC) 2954:"Broad range of civil." 1915:12:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC) 1897:22:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC) 1878:22:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC) 1859:22:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC) 1812:22:42, 4 May 2014 (UTC) 1792:21:11, 4 May 2014 (UTC) 1777:11:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC) 1753:21:11, 4 May 2014 (UTC) 1730:21:58, 4 May 2014 (UTC) 1702:21:11, 4 May 2014 (UTC) 1671:20:30, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 1657:20:22, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 1643:20:19, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 1628:20:17, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 1595:20:13, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 1573:20:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 1558:19:59, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 1543:19:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 1222:12:02, 6 May 2014 (UTC) 1201:23:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC) 784:23:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC) 745:On reflection, I think 342:European Union articles 96:International relations 87:International relations 59:International relations 3585:C-Class Trade articles 2777:and I lost that bet.) 2546:TTIP Draft, article 14 1987:Resolving these issues 1070:TTIP Draft, Article 57 1048:TTIP Draft, article 14 573:Benefits and criticism 237:United States articles 28:This article is rated 3358:John Maynard Friedman 3220:John Maynard Friedman 2854:have a Betriebsrat." 2409:John Maynard Friedman 2286:ratification of which 2276:ratification of which 2003:John Maynard Friedman 1996:wp:Dispute resolution 1971:John Maynard Friedman 1956:John Maynard Friedman 1907:John Maynard Friedman 1214:John Maynard Friedman 835:; it's the opposite. 741:Sources for Criticism 424:WikiProject Economics 311:European Union portal 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 2900:ZweiterSternVonLinks 2862:ZweiterSternVonLinks 2832:ZweiterSternVonLinks 2797:ZweiterSternVonLinks 2743:ZweiterSternVonLinks 2626:(21 February 2012). 2221:why not rephrase it? 2081:"The text leaked by 1611:ACTA Blog is a WP:RS 1323:Hopkins University. 1172:WP:original research 1161:WP:original research 1143:WP:original research 179:United States portal 3036:POV content in lead 2976:TTIP of the Iceberg 1889:NorthBySouthBaranof 1722:NorthBySouthBaranof 1318:CorporateEurope.org 205:Articles Requested! 3373:Absolutelypuremilk 3307:Absolutelypuremilk 3242:Mutual recognition 3233:Mutual recognition 3082:disruptive editing 3078:European Comission 751:User:KF Kaltenborn 593:Big error in table 447:Economics articles 34:content assessment 3198:User:BowlAndSpoon 3153:User:BowlAndSpoon 3005: 2993:comment added by 1903:Unsourced content 1015: 1014: 890:Unsourced content 616: 604:comment added by 570: 569: 566: 565: 562: 561: 513:WikiProject Trade 477: 476: 473: 472: 372: 371: 368: 367: 267: 266: 263: 262: 135: 134: 131: 130: 3602: 3489: 3484: 3478: 3473: 3335: 3330: 3061:reliably sourced 2946: 2939: 2814: 2645: 2644: 2642: 2640: 2620: 2614: 2613: 2611: 2609: 2594: 2588: 2587: 2585: 2583: 2568: 2562: 2557: 2548: 2543: 2534: 2529: 2520: 2515: 2506: 2499: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2476: 2465: 2458: 1773: 1768: 1539: 1534: 1468: 1462: 1415: 1409: 1389:WP:verifiability 1368: 1362: 1358: 1352: 1287: 1282: 1249: 1244: 1089: 1084: 1078: 1067: 1061: 1056: 1050: 1045: 1039: 1034: 1028: 1023: 988: 971: 966: 927: 922: 900:WP:verifiability 759:WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD 538: 537: 534: 531: 528: 507: 500: 499: 494: 486: 479: 449: 448: 445: 442: 439: 418: 413: 412: 402: 395: 394: 389: 381: 374: 344: 343: 340: 337: 334: 313: 308: 307: 306: 297: 290: 289: 284: 276: 269: 239: 238: 235: 232: 229: 181: 176: 175: 174: 165: 158: 157: 152: 144: 137: 107: 106: 103: 100: 97: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 3610: 3609: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3510: 3509: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3485: 3481: 3474: 3470: 3448: 3402: 3389: 3345: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3331: 3327: 3235: 3150: 3145: 3038: 3011: 2978: 2969: 2956: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2940: 2936: 2896: 2877: 2812: 2807: 2758: 2729: 2655: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2638: 2636: 2622: 2621: 2617: 2607: 2605: 2596: 2595: 2591: 2581: 2579: 2570: 2569: 2565: 2558: 2551: 2544: 2537: 2530: 2523: 2516: 2509: 2500: 2496: 2484: 2482: 2477: 2468: 2459: 2455: 2427:BemusedObserver 2390:BemusedObserver 2375:BemusedObserver 2346:BemusedObserver 2307:BemusedObserver 2257:BemusedObserver 2183:BemusedObserver 2143:BemusedObserver 2108:BemusedObserver 2051:BemusedObserver 1989: 1800: 1771: 1766: 1537: 1532: 1466: 1464:citation needed 1460: 1413: 1411:citation needed 1407: 1366: 1360: 1356: 1350: 1285: 1280: 1247: 1242: 1232: 1093: 1092: 1085: 1081: 1068: 1064: 1057: 1053: 1046: 1042: 1035: 1031: 1024: 1020: 1000:social security 969: 964: 925: 920: 892: 813: 791: 743: 642: 622: 595: 575: 552:High-importance 535: 532: 529: 526: 525: 493:High‑importance 492: 446: 443: 440: 437: 436: 414: 407: 387: 341: 338: 335: 332: 331: 309: 304: 302: 282: 236: 233: 230: 227: 226: 225: 211:Become a Member 177: 172: 170: 150: 121:High-importance 104: 101: 98: 95: 94: 62:High‑importance 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 3608: 3606: 3598: 3597: 3592: 3587: 3582: 3577: 3572: 3567: 3562: 3557: 3552: 3547: 3542: 3537: 3532: 3527: 3522: 3512: 3511: 3491: 3490: 3479: 3467: 3466: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3447: 3436: 3420: 3419: 3414: 3394: 3388: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3344: 3341: 3337: 3336: 3324: 3323: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3283: 3282: 3277: 3234: 3231: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3180: 3149: 3146: 3144: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3096: 3084:immediately.-- 3041:User:Der Golem 3037: 3034: 3019: 3018: 3015: 3010: 3007: 2977: 2974: 2962: 2955: 2952: 2948: 2947: 2933: 2932: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2892: 2876: 2873: 2851: 2850: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2794: 2779: 2778: 2757: 2754: 2728: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2663:User:Bobrayner 2654: 2651: 2647: 2646: 2615: 2589: 2563: 2549: 2535: 2521: 2507: 2494: 2466: 2452: 2451: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2341: 2340: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2280: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2222: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2209: 2201: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2160: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2089: 2077: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2067: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2022: 2021: 2016: 2015: 1999: 1988: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1832: 1831: 1823: 1822: 1799: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1761: 1760: 1756: 1755: 1740: 1739: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1689: 1688: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1616: 1615: 1612: 1609: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1383: 1382: 1320: 1319: 1316: 1313: 1310: 1309:Public Citizen 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1271: 1270: 1231: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1210: 1139: 1138: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1124: 1109:European Union 1091: 1090: 1079: 1062: 1051: 1040: 1029: 1017: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1009: 1004:state pensions 992: 985: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 954: 953: 952: 951: 934: 933: 891: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 852:George Monbiot 847: 812: 809: 790: 787: 742: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 711:81.173.163.177 692: 691: 669:In These Times 652:. Thank you. 641: 638: 627:Corne de brume 621: 618: 606:78.104.175.133 594: 591: 574: 571: 568: 567: 564: 563: 560: 559: 548: 542: 541: 539: 536:Trade articles 522:the discussion 508: 496: 495: 487: 475: 474: 471: 470: 463:Mid-importance 459: 453: 452: 450: 433:the discussion 420: 419: 403: 391: 390: 388:Mid‑importance 382: 370: 369: 366: 365: 358:Mid-importance 354: 348: 347: 345: 333:European Union 328:the discussion 324:European Union 315: 314: 298: 286: 285: 283:Mid‑importance 280:European Union 277: 265: 264: 261: 260: 253:Mid-importance 249: 243: 242: 240: 224: 223: 218: 213: 208: 201: 199:Template Usage 195: 183: 182: 166: 154: 153: 151:Mid‑importance 145: 133: 132: 129: 128: 117: 111: 110: 108: 91:the discussion 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3607: 3596: 3593: 3591: 3588: 3586: 3583: 3581: 3578: 3576: 3573: 3571: 3568: 3566: 3563: 3561: 3558: 3556: 3553: 3551: 3548: 3546: 3543: 3541: 3538: 3536: 3533: 3531: 3528: 3526: 3523: 3521: 3518: 3517: 3515: 3508: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3488: 3483: 3480: 3477: 3472: 3469: 3465: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3453: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3435: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3418: 3415: 3413: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3405: 3399: 3393: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3350: 3342: 3334: 3329: 3326: 3322: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3281: 3278: 3276: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3268: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3253: 3251: 3246: 3243: 3238: 3232: 3230: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3181: 3178: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3147: 3142: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3097: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3042: 3035: 3033: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3016: 3013: 3012: 3008: 3006: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2995:92.20.243.103 2992: 2985: 2983: 2975: 2973: 2972: 2968: 2967: 2959: 2953: 2944: 2938: 2935: 2931: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2895: 2889: 2886: 2885: 2882: 2874: 2872: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2858: 2855: 2847: 2846: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2809: 2808: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2793: 2791: 2787: 2782: 2776: 2772: 2767: 2764: 2761: 2755: 2753: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2739: 2734: 2733: 2726: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2667: 2664: 2660: 2652: 2635: 2634: 2629: 2625: 2619: 2616: 2604: 2600: 2593: 2590: 2578: 2574: 2567: 2564: 2561: 2556: 2554: 2550: 2547: 2542: 2540: 2536: 2533: 2528: 2526: 2522: 2519: 2514: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2498: 2495: 2488: 2480: 2475: 2473: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2457: 2454: 2450: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2405: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2289: 2287: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2277: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2229: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2216: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2206: 2203: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2165: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2085: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2025: 2018: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2004: 1997: 1993: 1986: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1865: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1847: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1775: 1774: 1769: 1758: 1757: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1741: 1737: 1736: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1714:publications. 1710: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1690: 1685: 1684: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1613: 1610: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1541: 1540: 1535: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1465: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1426: 1422: 1421: 1419: 1412: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1390: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1365: 1355: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1331: 1327: 1324: 1317: 1314: 1311: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1304: 1299: 1292: 1289: 1288: 1283: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1245: 1238: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1193:137.22.171.34 1189: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1175: 1173: 1168: 1164: 1162: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1113:United States 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1088: 1083: 1080: 1076: 1071: 1066: 1063: 1060: 1055: 1052: 1049: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1033: 1030: 1027: 1022: 1019: 1008: 1005: 1001: 993: 989: 986: 976: 973: 972: 967: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 950: 946: 942: 938: 937: 936: 935: 932: 929: 928: 923: 916: 915: 914: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 889: 883: 879: 875: 871: 870: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 848: 846: 842: 838: 834: 830: 829: 828: 827: 823: 819: 818:87.79.166.215 810: 808: 807: 803: 799: 795: 788: 786: 785: 781: 777: 772: 767: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 747:User:CFredkin 740: 734: 730: 726: 722: 721: 720: 716: 712: 708: 707: 706: 705: 701: 697: 690: 686: 682: 678: 677: 672: 670: 666: 665: 664: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 639: 637: 636: 632: 628: 619: 617: 615: 611: 607: 603: 592: 590: 589: 585: 581: 572: 557: 553: 547: 544: 543: 540: 523: 519: 515: 514: 509: 506: 502: 501: 497: 491: 488: 485: 481: 468: 464: 458: 455: 454: 451: 434: 430: 426: 425: 417: 411: 406: 404: 401: 397: 396: 392: 386: 383: 380: 376: 363: 359: 353: 350: 349: 346: 329: 325: 321: 320: 312: 301: 299: 296: 292: 291: 287: 281: 278: 275: 271: 258: 254: 248: 245: 244: 241: 228:United States 222: 219: 217: 214: 212: 209: 207: 206: 202: 200: 197: 196: 193: 189: 188: 180: 169: 167: 164: 160: 159: 155: 149: 148:United States 146: 143: 139: 126: 122: 116: 113: 112: 109: 92: 88: 84: 83: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 3495: 3482: 3471: 3463: 3449: 3425:37.191.5.234 3421: 3406: 3403: 3397: 3390: 3346: 3328: 3320: 3284: 3269: 3254: 3247: 3239: 3236: 3216: 3185:BowlAndSpoon 3179:and Canada." 3176: 3157:this content 3151: 3104: 3039: 3020: 2989:— Preceding 2986: 2981: 2979: 2970: 2963: 2960: 2957: 2937: 2929: 2898: 2893: 2890: 2887: 2880: 2878: 2859: 2856: 2852: 2789: 2785: 2780: 2774: 2770: 2768: 2765: 2762: 2759: 2736: 2735: 2731: 2730: 2656: 2637:. Retrieved 2631: 2624:Quinn Norton 2618: 2606:. Retrieved 2602: 2592: 2580:. Retrieved 2576: 2566: 2497: 2483:Cite error: 2456: 2448: 2403: 2342: 2323: 2273: 2234: 2220: 2207: 2204: 2199: 2157: 2122: 2082: 2075: 2065: 2029: 2026: 2019: 2014: 1992:User:Wikidea 1990: 1937:User:Wikidea 1935: 1921: 1902: 1866: 1862: 1848: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1824: 1815: 1801: 1764: 1762: 1712: 1617: 1603: 1530: 1528: 1457:User:Cwobeel 1423: 1332: 1328: 1325: 1321: 1300: 1297: 1278: 1240: 1233: 1190: 1176: 1169: 1165: 1158: 1140: 1131: 1104: 1100: 1094: 1082: 1074: 1065: 1054: 1043: 1032: 1021: 996: 984: 962: 918: 896:user:Wikidea 893: 856:The Guardian 814: 792: 770: 768: 762: 754: 744: 693: 681:C.J. Griffin 679:for example. 674: 667: 643: 623: 600:— Preceding 596: 576: 551: 511: 462: 422: 357: 317: 252: 216:Project Talk 204: 185: 120: 80: 40:WikiProjects 3440:37.30.7.213 3343:Veto powers 2813:<br: --> 2661:removed by 2639:22 February 1303:WP:reliable 874:Jonpatterns 646:WP:reliable 3514:Categories 3464:References 3349:Adam Hamdy 3321:References 3143:References 2930:References 2633:Wired News 2479:TTIP Draft 2449:References 2402:This is a 1743:Thank you. 833:neutrality 676:The Nation 3250:this edit 3113:Der Golem 3109:consensus 3086:Der Golem 3044:provided. 3009:Timeframe 2916:bobrayner 2711:bobrayner 2603:vieuws.eu 2577:vieuws.eu 2487:help page 2361:bobrayner 2049:page 46. 1315:ACTA Blog 837:bobrayner 438:Economics 429:Economics 385:Economics 3498:PJTraill 3452:addition 3407:Source: 3202:CFredkin 3161:CFredkin 3127:CFredkin 3046:CFredkin 2991:unsigned 2817:PJTraill 2697:CFredkin 2695:sources. 2681:PJTraill 2423:CFredkin 2330:CFredkin 2293:CFredkin 2243:CFredkin 2169:CFredkin 2129:CFredkin 2093:CFredkin 2084:Die Zeit 2037:CFredkin 1941:CFredkin 1924:CFredkin 1870:CFredkin 1851:CFredkin 1804:CFredkin 1784:CFredkin 1745:CFredkin 1694:CFredkin 1663:CFredkin 1635:CFredkin 1587:CFredkin 1550:CFredkin 1471:CFredkin 1394:CFredkin 1335:CFredkin 1260:CFredkin 1179:CFredkin 1147:CFredkin 1111:and the 941:CFredkin 904:CFredkin 860:PJTraill 798:Dribgons 725:CFredkin 696:CFredkin 654:CFredkin 602:unsigned 3101:WP:NPOV 3065:WP:LEAD 1830:secret. 1649:Cwobeel 1620:Cwobeel 1565:Cwobeel 1506:Cwobeel 1428:Cwobeel 1372:Cwobeel 554:on the 465:on the 360:on the 255:on the 123:on the 30:C-class 3072:. The 3070:WP:POV 2966:stuff. 2668:& 2608:3 June 2582:3 June 1885:source 757:, per 221:Alerts 36:scale. 3354:wp:RS 3303:WP:RS 2879:This 2771:Ever. 2677:WP:EL 2673:WP:EL 2284:"the 1868:made. 1821:laws. 1718:Wired 1687:such. 1105:TAFTA 527:Trade 518:Trade 490:Trade 3502:talk 3444:talk 3429:talk 3377:talk 3362:talk 3311:talk 3292:talk 3288:KVDP 3262:talk 3258:KVDP 3248:See 3224:talk 3206:talk 3189:talk 3165:talk 3148:ISDS 3131:talk 3117:talk 3090:talk 3050:talk 3027:talk 2999:talk 2920:talk 2904:talk 2881:edit 2866:talk 2836:talk 2821:talk 2801:talk 2790:will 2747:talk 2715:talk 2701:talk 2685:talk 2641:2012 2610:2012 2584:2012 2501:See 2460:See 2431:talk 2413:talk 2404:very 2394:talk 2379:talk 2365:talk 2350:talk 2334:talk 2311:talk 2297:talk 2261:talk 2247:talk 2187:talk 2173:talk 2147:talk 2133:talk 2112:talk 2097:talk 2055:talk 2041:talk 2007:talk 1975:talk 1960:talk 1945:talk 1928:talk 1911:talk 1893:talk 1874:talk 1855:talk 1808:talk 1788:talk 1772:idea 1749:talk 1726:talk 1707:See 1698:talk 1667:talk 1653:talk 1639:talk 1624:talk 1591:talk 1569:talk 1554:talk 1538:idea 1510:talk 1475:talk 1432:talk 1418:WP:V 1398:talk 1376:talk 1364:fact 1339:talk 1286:idea 1264:talk 1248:idea 1218:talk 1197:talk 1183:talk 1151:talk 1099:The 970:idea 945:talk 926:idea 908:talk 878:talk 864:talk 841:talk 822:talk 802:talk 780:talk 776:Paul 771:must 729:talk 715:talk 700:talk 685:talk 658:talk 631:talk 610:talk 584:talk 546:High 115:High 2860:-- 2795:-- 2741:-- 2665:in 1767:Wik 1533:Wik 1359:or 1305:: 1281:Wik 1243:Wik 1002:or 965:Wik 921:Wik 811:POV 457:Mid 352:Mid 247:Mid 3516:: 3504:) 3454:: 3431:) 3379:) 3364:) 3313:) 3294:) 3264:) 3252:. 3226:) 3208:) 3191:) 3183:-- 3167:) 3133:) 3119:) 3092:) 3052:) 3029:) 3021:-- 3001:) 2922:) 2906:) 2868:) 2838:) 2823:) 2803:) 2749:) 2717:) 2703:) 2687:) 2679:. 2630:. 2601:. 2575:. 2552:^ 2538:^ 2524:^ 2510:^ 2489:). 2469:^ 2433:) 2415:) 2396:) 2381:) 2367:) 2352:) 2336:) 2313:) 2299:) 2263:) 2249:) 2189:) 2175:) 2149:) 2135:) 2114:) 2099:) 2057:) 2043:) 2009:) 2001:-- 1977:) 1969:-- 1962:) 1947:) 1930:) 1913:) 1895:) 1876:) 1857:) 1810:) 1790:) 1751:) 1728:) 1711:. 1700:) 1669:) 1655:) 1641:) 1626:) 1593:) 1571:) 1556:) 1512:) 1477:) 1467:}} 1461:{{ 1434:) 1414:}} 1408:{{ 1400:) 1378:) 1367:}} 1361:{{ 1357:}} 1354:cn 1351:{{ 1341:) 1266:) 1239:. 1220:) 1199:) 1185:) 1153:) 1077:." 1011:” 991:“ 947:) 910:) 880:) 866:) 843:) 824:) 804:) 782:) 731:) 717:) 702:) 687:) 660:) 633:) 612:) 586:) 3500:( 3442:( 3427:( 3375:( 3360:( 3309:( 3290:( 3260:( 3222:( 3204:( 3187:( 3163:( 3129:( 3115:( 3088:( 3048:( 3025:( 2997:( 2971:" 2964:" 2941:[ 2918:( 2902:( 2864:( 2834:( 2819:( 2799:( 2745:( 2713:( 2699:( 2683:( 2643:. 2612:. 2586:. 2429:( 2411:( 2392:( 2377:( 2363:( 2348:( 2332:( 2309:( 2295:( 2259:( 2245:( 2185:( 2171:( 2145:( 2131:( 2110:( 2095:( 2053:( 2039:( 2005:( 1973:( 1958:( 1943:( 1926:( 1909:( 1891:( 1872:( 1853:( 1806:( 1786:( 1747:( 1724:( 1696:( 1665:( 1651:( 1637:( 1622:( 1589:( 1567:( 1552:( 1508:( 1473:( 1430:( 1396:( 1374:( 1337:( 1262:( 1216:( 1195:( 1181:( 1149:( 977:: 943:( 906:( 876:( 862:( 839:( 820:( 800:( 778:( 727:( 713:( 698:( 683:( 671:, 656:( 629:( 608:( 582:( 558:. 469:. 364:. 259:. 127:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index