2888:
1331:
a little bit odd. I think we are probably going nowhere and both articles will remain where they are (and as I wrote many times, I'm not happy with it because the hyphen in "Province of
Bolzano-Bozen" is a misleading mistake). I will accept any consensus and, as most of you know, I'm a peaceful and honest editor. The only thing I find difficult to accept is how 76.89.129.139/Icsunonove was blocked. In 2007-2009 he was sometimes aggressive and offensive, but this time he was simply expressing his/her opinion in a colorful way. It is a very sad day for Knowledge (XXG). --
1488:
Adige/Südtirol and I assume in the future many
English publications will adopt the name as it is now the sole official name c) however I also take in consideration that the region is made up of the two provinces of Trentino and South Tyrol, with the region today being an empty political shell with its former executive and legislative powers devolved to the two component provinces and d) as this is the English wikipedia I believe we should stick with English, which would mean that both Alto Adige and Südtirol be ineligible for the name... In short:
2035:: Any solution is better than the title we have now. As Gryffindor said "Trentino-Alto Adige" is Italian but (I add commonly) used in English, "Trentino-South Tyrol" is English and the sum of the two provinces (I add less common). Südtirol is German but the problem is that it is not used in English. Why do we have it in the title? That makes no sense to me (and according to any convention). The Italian Constitution does not count (otherwise we must move Italy to Italia or Repubblica Italiana). If we want a compromise, then it cannot be but
2468:
2419:
254:
2085:
clearly
Trentino-Alto Adige. As to the alleged decline, Trentino-Alto Adige is still used 10 times more often than Trentino-South Tyrol. But as I said, even Trentino-South Tyrol would be better than the solution we have now, which blatantly goes against English usage. English usage is Trentino-Alto Adige in first place and Trentino-South Tyrol in second place. We should not invent artificial titles which are used by nobody but Knowledge (XXG), which must instead reflect common usage.--
392:
2999:
assume there is a commune with 4 ladins, 4 mocheni and 4 cimbri (combined 12 minority-speakers), which is missing in the above document, and as the map shows language-ranges in steps of 10%, this commune can only be missing, if those 12 persons account for more than 10%, and thus the commune has at most 119 inhabitants. Such a small commune does not exist in
Trentino (the smallest being Palù del Fersina with 169 inhabitants, where 93% declared mocheno btw.).--
2976:) and were only shortly rewritten. Anyway, in linguistics Mocheno and Cimbrian are still typically classified as German dialects and I don't see any kind of "original research" by Sajoch. The map provides the information where Mocheno and Cimbrian are spoken and reflects therefor the census. What Sajoch did is using a similar colour for Mocheno, Cimbrian and South Tyrolean German (which is linguistically justified) and subsuming them in the caption.
2182:
have to break the cycle of naming and renaming debates and the only way I can see to achieve it is by applying one and the same standard throughout the entire debate. Although "Alto Adige" is, unlike "South Tyrol", a purely
Italian name, it appears to be nonetheless much more common in English usage as far as the region Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol is concerned. Since the naming convention is not about where names originally come from, but
413:
502:
2248:
That makes no sense and it goes against the common usage rule. Sorry, but we cannot hold a poll to subvert wikipedia standards. I repeat for the nth time: this is not a democracy. Any alternative is better than the clumsy hybrid
Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol, for the simple reason that its usage in English is extremely limited if not totally absent. Unless we want to operate double standards.--
308:
287:
245:
2039:. But I do not see why we should search for a new compromise or keep the present compromise here, whereas in the case of South Tyrol a compromise was even adversed with the argument that German and Italian interest count zero. Why should we apply double standards? Therefore I think we should apply the same rule which prevailed in order to rename South Tyrol and Trentino:
318:
2660:
is the majority language in South Tyrol. And I think there would be a problem with
Trentino-Alto Adige/South Tyrol. That would translate the German name of South Tyrol but not the Italian name. If we want to include "South Tyrol" to the article name, then it should be Trentino-South Tyrol because Alto Adige is just South Tyrol in Italian. --
1912:/Icsunonove/76.89.129.139 started his campaign by plastering every discussion full of his POV did we agree to compromise to the official double-name given in the Italian constitution. This was accepted by everyone including Taalo, who then proceeded to the other article "South Tyrol" to have that moved, but that's another story...
423:
786:— The current title was a compromise between Italian- and German-speaking interests. Titles in the English Knowledge (XXG), however, should reflect English usage whenever possible. Knowledge (XXG) also disfavors dual-name titles. Here, the evidence strongly shows that the most common name of this region
722:: Art. 116. (2) "Il Friuli Venezia Giulia , la Sardegna, la Sicilia, il Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol e la Valle d’Aosta/Valle´e d’Aoste dispongono di forme e condizioni particolari di autonomia, secondo i rispettivi statuti speciali adottati con legge costituzionale (3)." And thus ended this discussion.
2181:
I won't make a secret out of my deep dislike for the invented name "Alto Adige" and how it was purposefully created to destroy German-Tyrolean culture south of the
Brenner, but we have to remain consistent in our standards if we don't want to lay the seeds for yet another discussion in the future. We
1826:
To a certain extent such a floating concept of consensus makes sense. On the other hand, it ignores the amount of time and effort and also good will which are invested into mediation: a simple vote with a few users could nullify a monumental month long effort by a large group of editors. Wouldn't you
1585:
Here, it seems that everyone agrees that "Trentino-Alto Adige" is the most common name in
English-language sources. So even though an English term - "South Tyrol" - exists for part of the region's name, it should not be used in the article title. If some other name becomes used more often in English,
696:
I don't understand how it is possible we have to discuss the name of this page when the official name of the region is written in the
Italian Constitution Law. My proposal is to rename to "Trentino-Alto Adige", a simple copy and paste from the Italian Constitution. Not using the proper name is a gift
2403:
I agree with you (and most others), that the article should be renamed to "Trentino-South Tyrol", but due to different opinions it was subject to mediation in October 2006. Please see above. There's hardly any reference to the regions name, sources mostly talk about one of the two provinces Trentino
2247:
For 4 years we had province of Bolzano-Bozen as title for South Tyrol. 4 years without edit wars, 4 years of (at least implicit) consensus. It was decided to change it according to common usage. I have no problem with that. But in the case of Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol things seem to be immutable.
2213:
We need no mediation. This whole vote goes against conventions and cannot be regarded as valid. Trentino Alto-Adige is used more often in English. Such as South Tyrol is used more often than Alto Adige, which is why the constitutional name Alto Adige/Südtirol was rejected and any possible compromise
1907:
can apply if there is no controversy to the name (clearly there was and is), and where is the clause that states it overrules the aforementioned two rules? The name "Trentino-Alto Adige" is not an English but an Italian word that is used in English, whereas the term "Trentino-South Tyrol" is English
1877:
in case the earlier mediation effort turns out to be more binding than it now appears. Mediations are an important part of the WP problem solving procedure and undermining their significance and binding nature would have an undesirable adverse effect on the stability of article names. We must aim at
1436:
the region has become an empty administrative entity (I call it a zombie), since all powers (administration, legislation, finance, ...) were devolved to the two provinces of Trentino and South Tyrol. So there are hardly any new documents being produced about this anachronistic entity. That's why we
1330:
includes many truths. I don't say it from an Italian standpoint because I don't identify myself as an Italian. Some users in opposition of this move are using arguments which are very inconsistent to their arguments in the other discussion. They are completely free to do it, but their arguments look
3102:
Of course not. You created some useful map, but you also created maps that simply do not correspond to what the sources say. The maps you created using the Italian census 2011 are not correct and should be therefore removed here. We already have much better ones. In fact, we are discussing about if
2659:
I think the article name should be either Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol or Trentino-South Tyrol. Like mentioned in the earlier move discussion, Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol is used in the Italian constitution, and it would be a compromise between the Italian and German languages, the latter of which
1487:
this move request is awkward as is the current name... a) the most common name in English is Trentino-Alto Adige for it was the official name since World War II until the new name was introduced in the Italian constitution in 2001, b) but all official publications now use the new name Trentino-Alto
2598:
If the final name is to be Trentino-South Tyrol (sounds more English), Trentino-Alto Adige (is more common) or Trentino-Alto Adige/South Tyrol (common and sounds English) needs to be assessed. For sure, Trentino-South Tyrol is miles better than Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol. I even would suggest to
1831:
consensus more than five users voting on the same issue only a couple of months later? And, if the voting is done repeatedly and at the 'right time', as we have seen at the South Tyrol article, it may even acquire outright the air of misuse. Since WP is run by and dependent on men who, as anybody,
3313:
As I said, I'm not referring to the title of the article, but to what is mentioned several time in it. Personally, I think it's ok to refer to those provinces with the names that are used at the moment, but I do think that also the official names should be added, at least once, not to confuse the
2084:
We must follow common usage, as we did in the case of South Tyrol and Trentino. No double standards please. By the way, Trentino is also pure Italian, it is not a compromise, it is common usage. We need no mediation (Knowledge (XXG) is not a democracy) if common usage is clear: in this case it is
2065:
I can follow your reasoning, which results in "Trentino-Alto Adige". But "Trentino-Alto Adige" is a pure italian name, neither english, nor a compromise between italian/german, nor does it respect the mediation outcome, nor does it take into account that the mentioning of this region is declining
3271:
Hello! I am Italian, and I am just a bit confused about the name of the provinces that are mentioned several times in this page. You always take into consideration 2 provinces, which you name "Trentino" and "South Tyrol", while, actually, the official names should be "Trento" and "Bolzano/Bozen"
2998:
The document I took the data from, and we all are referring to, lists all communes with more than 4 persons declaring a minority language. And as no commune has less than 40 inhabitants, it's correct to assume, that there aren't any communes with less than 90% italian speaking people. Even if we
1751:
I am totally sucking in WikiLawyering, but it seems to me fairly clear that a decision by a mediation committee should only be revised by a mediation committee (or even a higher authority) as courts verdicts in RL can only be lifted by a higher court. Otherwise, what would have been the point in
1811:
As I stated above, the region is of no interest to the average english user. It's only an empty administrative shell, and thus could/should remain at its administrative/official name. Maybe in a few years, when there will be enough sources that endorse the name "Trentino/South Tyrol", we could
1249:
than "Trentino-South Tyrol" - let alone the current title, which is hardly used at all in English. Perhaps usage is changing, and one day "Trentino-South Tyrol" will surpass "Trentino-Alto Adige". But that day has not yet arrived, and Knowledge (XXG) does not predict usage - it reflects current
2906:
15° Censimento della popolazione e delle abitazioni Rilevazione sulla consistenza e la dislocazione territoriale degli appartenenti alle popolazioni di lingua ladina, mòchena e cimbra = 15th census of population and housing Enquiry about the number and the location of those who belong to the
2540:
Even if I think we should care more about the content, which is severely omissive with respect to history of the region between 1943 and 1988, than about the title, any solution is definitely better than artificial and exotic Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol. Trentino-Alto Adige works very well,
1770:
can change. Read that page, if you never have - it's pretty interesting. What I took away from it is that even things like the mediation committee are just tools in the consensus-building process. And if conditions change, if editors change, anything can be revisited. That's the beauty (and
3514:
The region is called this For the two provinces that are within this region in the South there is Trentino while in the North there is South Tyrol which in Italian is called Alto Adige therefore since in English the province is called South Tyrol the name Correct English of this region is
2452:
You really should re-read the above discussion. This page is on many people's radar, and I suspect another endlesses discussion will follow. Though the new view-point you bring against "Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol" is, that it gives a wrong impression that there may be two names...
1107:
I think you mean that the new name only became official with the amendment of the constitution in 2002 (or was it 2001?) and since then the old name Trentino-Alto Adige is not used anymore. Please correct me if I remember the dates of the official introduction of the new name wrong.
1350:
I appreciate you being peaceful, Checco, but whining about Icsunonove is off-topic here. BTW: I too was in favor of changing the hyphen to a slash: i voted for it. It would have been a small, but necessary correction. But now that we are asked to fix the bigger picture, I'm all for
2043:. There is no need to make any poll - I even think it would not be allowed according to policies -, the data provided show quite clearly that Trentino-Alto Adige is the most common name in English. Trentino Alto Adige is still used ten times more often than Trentino-South Tyrol.
987:
if you have not done so already. I am not interested in roling this up again since we came to a majority agreement after long and tedious discussions and the current name was the consensus that was reached. And I intend to keep the agreement that was reached by all parties.
521:
2555:
I'm glad, Patavium agrees using "Trentino-South Tyrol". The only problem remains, that "Trentino-South Tyrol" isn't used much in literature. My advise: there's no hurry: the region is a topic of modest relevance - and the single provinces use already their correct
1429:
was allowed in official documents (fascist laws still apply). That's also why road signs had to show those italian names, and that's why road maps like TeleAtlas (used by Google Earth) favor italian names - but finally corrections to TeleAtlas and Navteq are under
2541:
Trentino-South Tyrol works well, even Trentino-Alto Adige/South Tyrol would somehow work. For sure, the present solution does not work in an encyclopaedia written for English-speakers. Therefore I agree with DIREKTOR that a more appropiate name should be used.--
841:
1544:
propose such a move I am unwilling to either oppose or endorse this move request. Notwithstanding I believe that of the three possible options given Trentino-Alto Adige is the worst (as per inconsistency with the provinces names and as it is not English).
1722:
Interesting questions. I would imagine a decision could be revisited (or a new case opened) after a while - it seems unlikely that any decision could be binding in perpetuity. Is mediation something that anyone would be interested in trying?
2296:, this article does not, and should not, use the subject's name as it might be spelled in non-English languages as its article title; it instead uses the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language
1077:). After the 2nd statute in 1972 the region continued to exist only de jure (and thus rare mention in news or literature), while the province South Tyrol has become a de facto region. So if you want, leave the administrative name
2232:
a mediation and the current name is the result of this mediation 4 years ago (see above for the links) and because of that I am unwilling to change the current name, as all parties involved back then agreed to this compromise.
1977:(I know this for a fact since those users have communicated to me about this, ask yourself if you wish). I could easily start arguing for "Trentino-South Tyrol" again, but this is what was agreed and it should be honoured.
1964:
What do you mean with "show you the language"? It says it quite clear. This topic was discussed over months in detail and voted upon multiple times in the past and settled, under the given policies and guidelines.
170:
2931:
Thank you for finally starting to discuss the topic. The first issue, however, is already explained in the article, citing the academic essay by Anthony R. Rowley whose title is more or less self-explanatory
1679:
1292:
Knowledge (XXG) does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it instead uses the name which is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources.
922:
Knowledge (XXG) does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it instead uses the name which is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources.
1178:
1578:"Where there is an English word, or exonym, for the subject but a native version is more common in English-language usage, the English name should be mentioned but should not be used as the article title."
1194:
1023:
The English name of the region is actually "South Tyrol" with a "y", however the boundaries are not as precise as administrative boundaries. Thus I'm okay with the current name, despite its awkwardness.
2751:
This article is about todays region, not some entity in the past. 215 years ago "Alto Adige" was a district between Verona, Brescia and Mantova... So to avoid confusion, we should move to "Trentino-South
1218:
after 2001, but having passed less than 10 years, the evidence is not so strong and there's still way to go. Therefore I leave it up to others to decide, if we leave the unwieldy but politically correct
941:
We have discussed this issue many times and voted upon it and come to a final agreement in the end to go with the name given in the Italian constitution. I don't think this box should be reopened again.
821:
3515:
Trentino-South Tyro please move it because it is also a bit strange that in the English Knowledge (XXG) page there is the name of the region in two languages Alto Adige/Südtirol which is in German.
2371:
can be called "Südtirol"). Its a bad idea. Its also a bad idea to call it simply "Trentino-Alto Adige" per the many valid arguments listed above. Since on this project "Alto Adige/Südtirol" is named
2127:
did not matter at all. In the case of Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol you do not agree with the move to "Italian" Trentino-Alto Adige (common usage in English) because in your eyes it would go against
1708:
What does this mean? What is the procedure if there is a Mediation Committee case and one wishes to reopen it? Or is there even such a possibility to reopen a decision by the Mediation Committee??
636:
1706:"Decision of the Mediation Committee - It has been decided and voted upon to agree on the compromise "Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol", which is the official name given in the Italian constitution."
1908:
and the only logical sum of the two provinces. Also the term "Alto Adige" in itself was not acceptable for the wider region, since the article was and now again is called "South Tyrol". After
879:, but at least no-one could question you intellectual honesty and good faith. I understood your arguments and, although I disagre, I enjoy reading your opinions and I hold you in high esteem.
3295:
Knowledge (XXG) does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name; it prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources.
813:
3621:
817:
3363:
3362:
Even the name "Alto Adige" is, I'd dare say, used more frequently than "provincia di Bolzano". And I should think this includes when speaking of the provinces' official institutions.--
2450:
I did that too (see the table above, which I inserted on 17 April 2011). Others will then search for the occurence of "Trentino-Alto Adige" and argue that it appears much more often...
594:
61:
1140:
was inserted in the italian constitution). The following table shows data from english Google Books, about two decades before and one decade after making "Südtirol" an official name:
964:, your rationale was "Most commonly used name in the English language and literature and media for this region." And I agree with that. Isn't it also true for "Trentino-Alto Adige"?
258:
3088:
Patavium: if you have anything to object, please discuss it on Commons. As you are bad-mouthing any(!) map I created or updated, you aren't credible - it's only personal attacks.--
1873:
we have found the most common names each and something for everybody, thereby bringing the year-long naming row to an end. However, I reserve the right to change my stance into an
837:
3029:
The census does not say if in the rest of Trentino Italian in spoken. It could be Trentinian, Venetian, Lombard etc, but also Arab, Romanian etc. The census does not assess this.
650:
2737:
Well, historically Südtirol indicates today's Trentino-Alto Adige or today's Trentino. The province of Bolzano was Mitteltirol. So from this point of view the title is fine.--
3023:
There is a statistical problem: the statistic population of the census in South Tyrol are the Italian citizens, in Trentino the inhabitants. It is not possible to mix them.
1857:. While "South Tyrol" and "Trentino" are each more common, the compound name "Trentino-Alto Adige" appears to be more common than a combination of the two. I hope that with
2982:
I'll add that information to the file description. As long as we say clearly that the statistic population in the two provinces is different, we don't have any problems. --
1870:
2674:
Like I said, the problem with the current "compromise" version is it that gives the impression that the two names of this region are "Trentino-Alto Adige" and "Südtirol".
2100:
1927:
1896:
1796:
Hmm,... but looking at the above opinions and the length of the debate already I think it will be hard to reach consensus for a move (or for that matter against a move).
984:
Dohn joe, my argument is actually to have it under "Trentino-South Tyrol". Please read first all the arguments given in the previous discussions and votes that were held
3611:
3530:"Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol" is the official name of the region, according to the Italian Constitution. I would not oppose a move to "Trentino-South Tyrol", to match
3456:
3452:
3438:
3314:
readers. At least, in the administrative section of the page, I think the provinces should be named using their real name, not their geographical name. Just a thought
587:
580:
164:
1294:
And Biel/Bienne is a separate issue. We use that title not because of a French-German compromise, or because of official usage, but because it is commonly referred to
833:
844:
also shows that "Trentino-Alto Adige" dwarfs all other names for this region in English. The proposed title follows Knowledge (XXG) guidelines and policies, such as
829:
825:
551:
525:
215:
211:
207:
608:
566:
3424:
1582:"It is not our business to predict what term will be in use, but rather to observe what is and has been in use, and will therefore be familiar to our readers."
1569:
1537:
1525:
1512:
1499:
479:
96:
3626:
1687:
in March 2007 was based on the outcome of this process, but I'd like to know whether any such decision by a mediation committee is to be considered binding.
3606:
3272:(Italian/German names). I don't know the reason why you called them differently, but I just wanted to point out that the way you call them isn't official.
1264:
Any way you look at it still doesn't change the fact that the official name as given in the Italian constitution is in both languages. See also the case of
2603:
one of those titles while we are discussing. For sure, the present pseudo-compromise must be removed the sooner the better. The old mediation went against
2426:
mediations: they're a useless, contemptible waste of time and contributions, and they often do far more damage than good. Lets just move the damn thing..
869:. The current title is neither a dual title nor a bad compromise between Italian- and German-speakers, in fact it is the official name of the region (see
3651:
469:
3404:
1651:
name of this region will be difficult to bolster with numbers, but the worst thing we could do is to change this regions name to an old/abandoned one.--
2145:
Most common name goes if it adheres to the policy of neutrality. In this case it clearly does not, so please do not accuse anyone of double standards.
790:
is "Trentino-Alto Adige". Note: this move request also applies to all other Knowledge (XXG) articles with "Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol" in the title.
3188:
Please note that the method of gathering statistical data on the population in the two provinces was different and the data aren't directly comparable
1675:
1250:
usage. Is there anyone who disagrees that "Trentino-Alto Adige" is currently the most common way to refer to this region in English-language sources?
573:
374:
102:
3656:
3636:
3616:
3056:
To Patavium: Please desist from dissing on User:Sajoch by publicly writing that he purposely "manipulated" facts, and keep a neutral tone. Assume
1771:
frustration) of Knowledge (XXG) - it's controlled by all of us, and whatever "we" decide stands only as long as consensus supports that decision.
1625:
A search for "Trentino-Alto Adige" cannot be restricted to recent publications (less than a decade), and if so, the numbers wouldn't be meaningful
364:
3414:
2367:
The current name gives the impression that there are two names for this region #1 "Trentino-Alto Adige", and #2 "Südtirol" (that is to say, that
445:
3534:, or the latter's move to "Alto Adige/Südtirol", to match "Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol". The only option I oppose is "Trentino-Alto Adige". --
547:
1895:: Again Firmly Oppose. The reason why we settled on this compromise after many debates and discussions was that it confirmed to the guideline
601:
2903:
3254:
I have looked at your edits Patavium, and you are basically objecting that Mocheno and Cimbrian are bundled together as Germanic languages?
809:
3641:
2107:. Common usage does not override that. In this case we take the official name as given in the English version of the Italian constitution.
704:
47:
1074:
became official only after the second autonomy statute in 1972 (See Part 3 "South Tyrols new name and powers" of THE SOUTH TYROL AUTONOMY
622:
3646:
3516:
3321:
3279:
3038:
Separate maps for Trentino (of course not the one manipulated by Sajoch) and South Tyrol would be statistically and factually correct.--
340:
2128:
2124:
2104:
1969:/Icsunonove/76.89.129.139 constantly harassed the debate, that in the end a number of users who voted or were involved quit, such as
1931:
1900:
436:
397:
116:
3434:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
3180:
Since removing this map was not possible due to massive editwarring, at least the biggest mistakes were corrected. Please notice my
2186:, "Trentino-Alto Adige" is preferable over "Trentino-South Tyrol" which is more English, but – this is the point – much less common
1433:
if we do a Google search, it's difficult to narrow the results to documents written only in the last few years (less than a decade).
2047:. But the even greater point is: clumsy and Un-English (in terminology and usage) Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol must be replaced.---
121:
37:
3367:
1574:"The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language"
1934:
that supports the current title? I've read both, and I've even quoted from the naming convention - to me they seem to agree with
3106:
Maybe the problem is that the data of the census in Trentino are only in Italian, in this case we can find someone that helps.--
91:
3631:
3601:
3388:
779:
41:
643:
532:
514:
267:
2292:- I agree with the reasons as outlined by the nominator. This is the English Knowledge (XXG), and according to the policy of
2045:
I would rename the article Trentino-Alto Adige and in the introduction I would mention Trentino-South Tyrol immediately after
876:
808:
as nom. "Trentino-Alto Adige" is by far the most common way to refer to this region in English. See Google Books: 17,300 for
541:
3425:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070311010226/http://www.consiglio.provincia.tn.it/consiglio/autonomia_trentina/picb/F5-1-5.jpg
331:
292:
185:
82:
2887:
1367:
It could be, but as Icsunonove's last message (directed to Dohn joe) was on this move, I wanted to have it linked here. --
152:
3342:
The region is divided into two autonomous provinces: Trentino (Province of Trento) and South Tyrol (Province of Bolzano).
1737:
Reopening this case is not something that I would support. Otherwise we'll end up revisiting this over and over again...
1622:
A search for "Trentino-Alto Adige" includes results for "Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol" and "Trentino-Alto Adige/whatever"
615:
3499:
3218:
Excellent! The map has been removed finally! I had tried to remove it previously, but edit-warring made this impossible.
3026:
In Trentino only minorities are assessed, i.e. Cimbrian, Mocheno and Ladin. There is no assessment of Italian language.
2327:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
755:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
3570:
3552:
2279:
769:
3405:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070805181615/http://www.circa.europa.eu/irc/dsis/regportraits/info/data/en/itd2_geo.htm
2404:
or South Tyrol. If you find some prominent sources citing "Trentino-South Tyrol", you're welcome to report it here.--
2339:
As it is connected to this discussion I would like to invite editors to please check out the similar move request at
3428:
1540:
and because it would be in line with the most common names of the two provinces; however as this move request does
202:
126:
2913:
The statistic population of the census in Trentino and South Tyrol is different. Data cannot be mixed together.--
957:
3455:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2123:
I cannot see your point. When it was about to rename the province of Bolzano-Bozen into German-like South Tyrol
1812:
request a move to this name. For now I'm happy if I don't have to loose much time for another endless debate.--
224:
708:
664:
146:
17:
3415:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090201175658/http://circa.europa.eu/irc/dsis/regportraits/info/data/en/index.htm
273:
3520:
3325:
3283:
3490:
3396:
3221:
If someone wants to reinsert, please consider this disclaimer. The best thing would be not to reinsert it.--
2340:
2198:
1883:
1837:
1757:
1692:
1327:
1323:
3317:
3294:
3275:
2293:
1939:
1935:
1904:
1854:
1521:
1508:
1495:
1438:
1283:
917:
845:
700:
629:
3392:
2904:
http://www.statistica.provincia.tn.it/binary/pat_statistica/demografia/15CensGenPopolazione.1340956277.pdf
2275:
765:
719:
142:
3408:
3057:
2485:
Fellas, I've been around the block here: I'm not saying its the most common. I'm saying its in-line with
1767:
1617:- please note the subtle difference!) on Google Search results. But Google Search has several handicaps:
1401:
in english texts. And our guests which are non-native italian or german, know this province by the name
72:
3474:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
3462:
2797:
Anyway, what the Italian Constitution says is relevant for the content of the article, not for its name.
444:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
339:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3395:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
3032:
Cimbrian and Mocheno are recognized as different languages under the so called Second Autonomy Statute.
985:
87:
3418:
3578:
3560:
3349:
3302:
3259:
3065:
2987:
2150:
2112:
1982:
1917:
1742:
1393:
I'm very consistent with my arguments, and in fact I always try to back up my position with numbers:
1273:
993:
947:
929:
192:
2940:). He's explaining there how the legal recognition and and relation to the Standard German of these
2766:
I would've already gone through with a good-faith move, but it seems the article is move-protected.
2467:
Sajoch's right, of course. You can show 1,300 results for "Trentino-South Tyrol", and I'll show you
559:
244:
3193:
In Trentino the statistical population is given by the inhabitants, in South Tyrol by the citizens;
2021:
1866:
1075:
783:
178:
2979:
I don't get what you are saying. Are you denying that Italian is spoken in the red coloured areas?
3226:
3209:
3139:
3125:
3111:
3079:
3043:
2918:
2872:
2853:
2805:
2776:
2742:
2684:
2665:
2618:
2546:
2507:
2476:
2436:
2389:
2352:
2253:
2238:
2219:
2194:
2166:
2136:
2090:
2052:
2001:
1951:
1879:
1833:
1801:
1776:
1753:
1728:
1713:
1688:
1595:
1550:
1303:
1255:
1113:
1010:
969:
901:
896:
Thanks for the kind words, Checco. I, too, appreciate your good faith and respect your opinions.
857:
795:
727:
229:
3582:
3564:
3543:
3524:
3504:
3459:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
3371:
3353:
3329:
3306:
3287:
3263:
3230:
3213:
3143:
3129:
3115:
3097:
3083:
3069:
3047:
3008:
2991:
2922:
2876:
2861:
2809:
2784:
2761:
2746:
2692:
2669:
2622:
2565:
2550:
2515:
2480:
2462:
2444:
2413:
2397:
2356:
2309:
2283:
2257:
2242:
2223:
2202:
2170:
2154:
2140:
2116:
2094:
2079:
2056:
2025:
2005:
1986:
1955:
1921:
1887:
1841:
1821:
1805:
1780:
1761:
1746:
1732:
1717:
1696:
1672:: I would like to point out that the current name of the article has apparently been subject to
1660:
1599:
1554:
1471:
1376:
1360:
1340:
1307:
1277:
1259:
1236:
1117:
1098:
1058:
1033:
1015:
997:
973:
951:
933:
905:
890:
861:
799:
773:
731:
712:
3475:
3573:
says "Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol". I don't have strong opinions about the matter, though...
3074:
I agree with you. But en.Wiki is not a planet out of this universe, if you know what I mean.--
2305:
68:
2490:
1943:
849:
657:
3539:
3093:
3004:
2757:
2561:
2458:
2409:
2075:
1817:
1752:
establishing a mediation committee if its decisions can be lifted by a simple move request?
1656:
1467:
1372:
1356:
1336:
1232:
1094:
1054:
1029:
886:
870:
428:
412:
391:
226:
3482:
875:@Dohn joe: It is amazing how you can be on the wrong side of the argument both here and at
158:
3574:
3556:
3345:
3298:
3255:
3061:
2983:
2146:
2108:
1978:
1913:
1738:
1287:
1269:
989:
943:
925:
2604:
2486:
2376:
2318:
2297:
746:
23:
697:
to the enemies of Knowledge (XXG) who can say that we don't put "quality" in Wikipedi.
228:
3441:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2017:
1974:
501:
3481:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
3448:
1422:
is hard to find in english texts (ngram-viewer returns no data!) has several reasons:
3595:
3222:
3205:
3198:
In Trentino only minorities are assessed. There is no assessment of Italian language.
3135:
3121:
3107:
3075:
3039:
2914:
2907:
population of Ladin, Mocheno and Cimbrian language. Not a word about German language.
2868:
2846:
2801:
2769:
2738:
2677:
2661:
2614:
2542:
2500:
2472:
2429:
2382:
2348:
2249:
2234:
2215:
2162:
2132:
2086:
2048:
1997:
1947:
1832:
only have a finite amount of time and patience left, this should be considered, too.
1797:
1772:
1724:
1709:
1591:
1568:
as nom. It may seem odd, but "Trentino-Alto Adige" is not actually inconsistent with
1546:
1299:
1251:
1109:
965:
897:
853:
791:
723:
2301:
1970:
1532:
Taking into account the above considerations I would prefer to move the article to
1450:. But we shouldn't move it to the old imposed name. And yes, as soon as the name
323:
3103:
your maps can be inserted into the encyclopaedia. Commons has different standards.
3429:
http://www.consiglio.provincia.tn.it/consiglio/autonomia_trentina/picb/F5-1-5.jpg
3535:
3531:
3089:
3035:
In fact Mocheno and Cimbrian minorities have their own media in their languages.
3000:
2800:
I agree with DIREKTOR. It is a pity that the title of the article was blocked.--
2753:
2557:
2454:
2405:
2372:
2071:
1858:
1813:
1652:
1463:
1368:
1352:
1332:
1265:
1228:
1090:
1050:
1025:
961:
882:
824:(many of which are Knowledge (XXG) mirrors). See also Google Scholar: 4,130 for
546:. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see:
3447:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1966:
1909:
1446:
This is why I don't care much, if the region remains under the bilingual name
1085:, which isn't appropriate any more. Hence I would strongly suggest a move to
522:
Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places
418:
313:
3510:
Please move the page from Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol to Trentino-Alto Adige
1241:
But your own evidence (and mine as well) shows that "Trentino-Alto Adige" is
2892:
Map to be removed: alleged Language distribution in South Tyrol and Trentino
441:
2948:) is evolving. It is indeed a fact that the provincial laws avoid the word
1636:
but hardly ever to the region as a whole (you don't spend your holidays in
307:
286:
2899:
This map is original research by Sajoch and a manipulation of the Census.
2344:
2300:. This includes usage in the sources used as references for the article.
1862:
3409:
http://circa.europa.eu/irc/dsis/regportraits/info/data/en/itd2_geo.htm
2066:(having it become an empty shell). The second sentence states, that
1640:, and also the apples come from either Trentino or from South Tyrol)
1070:
in Google Books or other sources, relies in the fact, that the name
3419:
http://circa.europa.eu/irc/dsis/regportraits/info/data/en/index.htm
2886:
1827:
say that, say, 20 users discussing and voting an outcome reflects
1685:
the move from Trentino-South Tyrol to Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
336:
1409:
in ALL tourism brochures and webpages meant for english visitors.
1586:
we (or future editors) can revisit. But for now, the best title
3555:
of the Italian Constitution still says "Trentino-Alto Adige".--
2794:
As far as I know Trentino-Alto Adige is more common in English.
2375:, this article should be renamed to "Trentino-South Tyrol" per
1418:
What I tried to explain above: the fact that the region's name
2068:
the region consists of two provinces: Trentino and South Tyrol
1498:
but a name which has been officially superseded and it is not
1128:
is still used (obviously). But you're right, the german name
1066:
The fact, that it is difficult to find references to the name
238:
230:
32:
2070:- let the name respect that fact, or leave this page alone.--
3120:
I think that the statistic data for Trentino are credible.--
1683:. I am not sure what exactly this means and to what extent
3399:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
3134:
Finally it is not a personal, but a statistical problem.--
1613:
is the most used name in english texts (not the most used
2902:
Mocheno and Cimbrian are languages different from German
2867:
No, I would object to that. You can try an RM or an RFC.
2099:
We can follow common usage if it is not in conflict with
2613:. No it is not. It is a High-importance Italy article.--
1938:
in this case, and support "Trentino-Alto Adige". (Also,
1458:, it will be logical to change also the regions name to
745:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
2938:"Mocheno and Cimbrian". From dialect(s) to language(s)?
2910:
There is no assessment of Italian language in Trentino.
1684:
2493:. We're supposed to look for the most common, neutral
2274:
per Gryffindor. The current name is the correct name.
1926:
Gryffindor - would you please show me the language in
1223:, or if we look forward and consider the trend versus
177:
2343:
where a request has been made to move the article to
2317:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
2843:
Can I go ahead and request an uncontroversial move?
2161:
It was not an accusation, but a simple constation.--
2101:
WP:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)#Use_English
1928:
WP:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)#Use_English
1897:
WP:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)#Use_English
1524:
names of the two component provinces and also using
637:
Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
440:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
335:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
3622:
Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Geography
3451:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1298:with the slash, which is not true for this region.
191:
2228:ah sorry to chip in Patavium: we actually already
2131:. Double standards, what was to be demonstrated.--
1462:, being the region the sum of the two provinces.--
2934:"Mocheno e Cimbro". Von Dialek(en) zu Sprache(n)?
50:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1942:is a WP policy, and thus on equal footing with
651:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs of places
3437:This message was posted before February 2018.
1136:) became only official in 2001 (when the name
595:Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
2214:was blocked due to common usage. Full stop.--
8:
2960:) and first drafts still included the words
2952:, although the very first article speaks of
764:: no concensus in 28 days, and none likely.
3612:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Geography
2341:Talk:Province of Trento#Requested move 2011
1507:= new and sole official name, but neither
698:
509:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
487:
386:
281:
3387:I have just modified 3 external links on
2611:the region is a topic of modest relevance
2469:419,000 results for "Trentino-Alto Adige"
1871:Euroregion Tyrol – South Tyrol – Trentino
3268:°== Provinces in Trentino-Alto Adige ==
1151:
956:But Gryffindor, in your request to move
3060:and engage in a productive discussion.
1081:, but do not change it to its old name
581:Geographic related deletion discussions
388:
283:
242:
3607:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles
2791:Südtirol was established in the 1970s.
1045:, and thus the region should be named
852:, and follows English-language usage.
720:Costituzione della Repubblica Italiana
1609:Yes Dohn joe, we base the claim that
1405:- that's why this province is called
552:Unknown-importance geography articles
454:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Geography
7:
1397:is several times more frequent than
1322:What 76.89.129.139/Icsunonove wrote
1041:The english name of the province is
760:The result of the move request was:
609:Geography articles needing infoboxes
567:Geography articles needing attention
538:Tag related article talk pages with
434:This article is within the scope of
329:This article is within the scope of
3627:C-Class vital articles in Geography
1766:I think the answer to that is that
1570:WP:Naming conventions (use English)
1538:WP:Naming conventions (use English)
1526:WP:Naming conventions (use English)
1513:WP:Naming conventions (use English)
1500:WP:Naming conventions (use English)
272:It is of interest to the following
40:for discussing improvements to the
3364:2001:A60:153D:1:95A6:D57E:4AA7:AD7
2334:Move request at Province of Trento
2184:how often they are used in English
31:
3652:Mid-importance geography articles
3391:. Please take a moment to review
1089:by considering up-to-date data.--
491:WikiProject Geography To-do list:
349:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Italy
67:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
2599:move the article immediately to
1132:(and thus also the english name
526:Missing articles about Locations
500:
421:
411:
390:
316:
306:
285:
252:
243:
62:Click here to start a new topic.
2129:WP:Neutral_point_of_view#Naming
2125:WP:Neutral_point_of_view#Naming
2105:WP:Neutral_point_of_view#Naming
2037:Trentino-Alto Adige/South Tyrol
1932:WP:Neutral_point_of_view#Naming
1901:WP:Neutral_point_of_view#Naming
474:This article has been rated as
369:This article has been rated as
3657:WikiProject Geography articles
3637:High-importance Italy articles
3617:C-Class level-5 vital articles
3583:08:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
3565:21:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
3336:First sentence of the chapter
877:Talk:Province of Bolzano-Bozen
623:Knowledge (XXG) requested maps
457:Template:WikiProject Geography
1:
3372:14:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
3231:22:27, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
3214:20:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
3144:17:34, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
3130:17:28, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
3116:17:19, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
3098:15:43, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
3084:12:35, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
3070:12:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
3048:11:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
3009:19:40, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
2992:08:20, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
2923:23:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
2877:18:06, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
2862:10:08, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
2810:21:43, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
2785:21:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
2762:21:32, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
2747:19:40, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
2693:10:17, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
2670:10:13, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
2516:19:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
2481:19:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
2463:19:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
2445:19:04, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
2414:18:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
2398:17:09, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
1647:That's why I wrote, that the
548:Unassessed geography articles
448:and see a list of open tasks.
343:and see a list of open tasks.
59:Put new text under old text.
3505:14:09, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
3389:Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
2623:21:54, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
2566:21:14, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
2551:20:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
1505:Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
1448:Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
1221:Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
1079:Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
780:Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
42:Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
3642:All WikiProject Italy pages
3264:14:54, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
1878:less not more discussions.
1674:mediation in October 2006:
3673:
3647:C-Class geography articles
3544:12:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
3525:11:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
3468:(last update: 5 June 2024)
3384:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
3354:06:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
3330:17:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
3307:07:37, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
3288:16:34, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
2958:German-speaking population
2357:08:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
2284:16:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
2258:20:22, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
2243:19:57, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
2224:19:44, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
2203:16:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
2171:19:44, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
2155:16:14, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
2141:14:49, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
2117:14:26, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
2095:10:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
2080:09:19, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
2057:20:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
2026:19:25, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
2006:09:33, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
1987:10:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
1956:22:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
1922:15:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
1888:10:01, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
1842:09:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
1822:08:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
1806:05:07, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
1781:00:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
1762:00:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
1747:22:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
1733:21:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
1718:10:25, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
1697:09:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
1661:08:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
1600:04:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
1590:is "Trentino-Alto Adige".
1572:, which begins like this:
1555:01:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
1472:20:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
1425:before 2001 only the name
1377:20:08, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
1361:19:59, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
1341:18:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
1308:16:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
1278:16:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
1260:16:11, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
1237:21:30, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
1118:18:34, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
1099:18:26, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
1059:18:26, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
1034:14:26, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
1016:21:01, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
998:00:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
974:20:31, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
952:19:44, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
934:19:33, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
906:20:21, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
891:19:24, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
862:17:26, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
800:17:23, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
480:project's importance scale
375:project's importance scale
352:Template:WikiProject Italy
1996:per Checco and Bejnar. -
1768:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus
1452:province of Bolzano-Bozen
1437:have difficulty to apply
1214:is declining in favor of
958:Province of Bolzano-Bozen
486:
473:
406:
368:
301:
280:
97:Be welcoming to newcomers
24:Talk:Trentino-South Tyrol
2324:Please do not modify it.
752:Please do not modify it.
732:00:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
713:19:21, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
588:Geographical coordinates
18:Talk:Trentino-Alto Adige
3380:External links modified
2954:popolazioni germanofone
2310:14:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
1628:People refer to either
774:10:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
3632:C-Class Italy articles
3602:C-Class vital articles
2946:German dialect islands
2895:
2379:(among other things).
1576:. Later on, it states
1282:True. But if you read
92:avoid personal attacks
2942:deutsche Sprachinseln
2890:
2363:More appropriate name
2016:, again per Checco.--
1247:ten times more common
542:WikiProject Geography
437:WikiProject Geography
266:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
259:level-5 vital article
117:Neutral point of view
3449:regular verification
2970:di origine germanica
1638:Trentino-South Tyrol
1534:Trentino-South Tyrol
1518:Trentino-South Tyrol
1460:Trentino-South Tyrol
1420:Trentino-South Tyrol
1225:Trentino-South Tyrol
1216:Trentino-South Tyrol
1168:Trentino-South Tyrol
1087:Trentino-South Tyrol
1068:Trentino-South Tyrol
1047:Trentino-South Tyrol
871:Italian Constitution
830:Trentino-South Tyrol
818:Trentino-South Tyrol
122:No original research
3439:After February 2018
2290:Support move/rename
1867:Trentino-Alto Adige
1851:Conditional support
1611:Trentino-Alto Adige
1492:Trentino-Alto Adige
1212:Trentino-Alto Adige
1184:Trentino-Alto Adige
1126:Trentino-Alto Adige
1083:Trentino-Alto Adige
826:Trentino-Alto Adige
810:Trentino-Alto Adige
784:Trentino-Alto Adige
3493:InternetArchiveBot
3444:InternetArchiveBot
2974:of German ancestry
2896:
2103:and the policy of
1899:and the policy of
820:; and only 48 for
460:geography articles
268:content assessment
103:dispute resolution
64:
3469:
3320:comment added by
3278:comment added by
2451:
2276:Outback the koala
1454:will be moved to
1379:
1363:
1199:
1198:
1124:The italian name
908:
880:
838:the current title
834:Trentino-Südtirol
822:the current title
814:Trentino-Südtirol
766:Anthony Appleyard
715:
703:comment added by
689:
688:
685:
684:
681:
680:
677:
676:
673:
672:
385:
384:
381:
380:
332:WikiProject Italy
237:
236:
83:Assume good faith
60:
22:(Redirected from
3664:
3503:
3494:
3467:
3466:
3445:
3332:
3290:
2860:
2859:
2856:
2849:
2783:
2782:
2779:
2772:
2691:
2690:
2687:
2680:
2514:
2513:
2510:
2503:
2495:English-language
2449:
2443:
2442:
2439:
2432:
2396:
2395:
2392:
2385:
2326:
2298:reliable sources
1366:
1349:
1152:
1013:
895:
874:
754:
574:Deletion sorting
545:
515:Article requests
504:
497:
496:
488:
462:
461:
458:
455:
452:
431:
429:Geography portal
426:
425:
424:
415:
408:
407:
402:
394:
387:
357:
356:
353:
350:
347:
326:
321:
320:
319:
310:
303:
302:
297:
289:
282:
265:
256:
255:
248:
247:
239:
231:
196:
195:
181:
112:Article policies
33:
27:
3672:
3671:
3667:
3666:
3665:
3663:
3662:
3661:
3592:
3591:
3512:
3497:
3492:
3460:
3453:have permission
3443:
3397:this simple FaQ
3382:
3315:
3273:
2885:
2854:
2851:
2847:
2844:
2777:
2774:
2770:
2767:
2685:
2682:
2678:
2675:
2508:
2505:
2501:
2498:
2437:
2434:
2430:
2427:
2390:
2387:
2383:
2380:
2365:
2336:
2331:
2322:
1520:= based on the
1326:and especially
1011:
750:
740:
694:
669:
665:Geography stubs
539:
459:
456:
453:
450:
449:
427:
422:
420:
400:
371:High-importance
354:
351:
348:
345:
344:
322:
317:
315:
296:High‑importance
295:
263:
253:
233:
232:
227:
138:
133:
132:
131:
108:
78:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3670:
3668:
3660:
3659:
3654:
3649:
3644:
3639:
3634:
3629:
3624:
3619:
3614:
3609:
3604:
3594:
3593:
3590:
3589:
3588:
3587:
3586:
3585:
3547:
3546:
3511:
3508:
3487:
3486:
3479:
3432:
3431:
3423:Added archive
3421:
3413:Added archive
3411:
3403:Added archive
3381:
3378:
3377:
3376:
3375:
3374:
3357:
3356:
3312:
3310:
3309:
3252:
3251:
3250:
3249:
3248:
3247:
3246:
3245:
3244:
3243:
3242:
3241:
3240:
3239:
3238:
3237:
3236:
3235:
3234:
3233:
3219:
3202:
3201:
3200:
3195:
3185:
3161:
3160:
3159:
3158:
3157:
3156:
3155:
3154:
3153:
3152:
3151:
3150:
3149:
3148:
3147:
3146:
3132:
3118:
3104:
3051:
3050:
3036:
3033:
3030:
3027:
3024:
3014:
3013:
3012:
3011:
2995:
2994:
2980:
2977:
2926:
2925:
2911:
2908:
2900:
2884:
2881:
2880:
2879:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2819:
2818:
2817:
2816:
2815:
2814:
2813:
2812:
2798:
2795:
2792:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2708:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2701:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2696:
2695:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2625:
2608:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2575:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2568:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2364:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2335:
2332:
2330:
2329:
2319:requested move
2313:
2312:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2060:
2059:
2029:
2028:
2009:
2008:
1990:
1989:
1975:User:Rarelibra
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1890:
1853:: Support per
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1700:
1699:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1626:
1623:
1604:
1603:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1515:
1502:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1434:
1431:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1387:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1344:
1343:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1268:as reference.
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1197:
1196:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1155:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1121:
1120:
1102:
1101:
1061:
1036:
1018:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
979:
978:
977:
976:
936:
911:
910:
909:
864:
777:
762:page not moved
758:
757:
747:requested move
741:
739:
738:Requested move
736:
735:
734:
705:151.30.200.163
693:
690:
687:
686:
683:
682:
679:
678:
675:
674:
671:
670:
668:
667:
653:
639:
625:
611:
597:
583:
569:
555:
528:
508:
506:
505:
493:
492:
484:
483:
476:Mid-importance
472:
466:
465:
463:
446:the discussion
433:
432:
416:
404:
403:
401:Mid‑importance
395:
383:
382:
379:
378:
367:
361:
360:
358:
355:Italy articles
341:the discussion
328:
327:
311:
299:
298:
290:
278:
277:
271:
249:
235:
234:
225:
223:
222:
219:
218:
198:
197:
135:
134:
130:
129:
124:
119:
110:
109:
107:
106:
99:
94:
85:
79:
77:
76:
65:
56:
55:
52:
51:
45:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3669:
3658:
3655:
3653:
3650:
3648:
3645:
3643:
3640:
3638:
3635:
3633:
3630:
3628:
3625:
3623:
3620:
3618:
3615:
3613:
3610:
3608:
3605:
3603:
3600:
3599:
3597:
3584:
3580:
3576:
3572:
3568:
3567:
3566:
3562:
3558:
3554:
3551:
3550:
3549:
3548:
3545:
3541:
3537:
3533:
3529:
3528:
3527:
3526:
3522:
3518:
3517:87.18.172.235
3509:
3507:
3506:
3501:
3496:
3495:
3484:
3480:
3477:
3473:
3472:
3471:
3464:
3458:
3454:
3450:
3446:
3440:
3435:
3430:
3426:
3422:
3420:
3416:
3412:
3410:
3406:
3402:
3401:
3400:
3398:
3394:
3390:
3385:
3379:
3373:
3369:
3365:
3361:
3360:
3359:
3358:
3355:
3351:
3347:
3343:
3339:
3335:
3334:
3333:
3331:
3327:
3323:
3322:78.134.105.78
3319:
3308:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3293:
3292:
3291:
3289:
3285:
3281:
3280:78.134.119.28
3277:
3269:
3266:
3265:
3261:
3257:
3232:
3228:
3224:
3220:
3217:
3216:
3215:
3211:
3207:
3203:
3199:
3196:
3194:
3191:
3190:
3189:
3186:
3183:
3179:
3178:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3174:
3173:
3172:
3171:
3170:
3169:
3168:
3167:
3166:
3165:
3164:
3163:
3162:
3145:
3141:
3137:
3133:
3131:
3127:
3123:
3119:
3117:
3113:
3109:
3105:
3101:
3100:
3099:
3095:
3091:
3087:
3086:
3085:
3081:
3077:
3073:
3072:
3071:
3067:
3063:
3059:
3055:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3049:
3045:
3041:
3037:
3034:
3031:
3028:
3025:
3022:
3021:
3020:
3019:
3018:
3017:
3016:
3015:
3010:
3006:
3002:
2997:
2996:
2993:
2989:
2985:
2981:
2978:
2975:
2971:
2967:
2963:
2959:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2943:
2939:
2935:
2930:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2924:
2920:
2916:
2912:
2909:
2905:
2901:
2898:
2897:
2894:Corrected map
2893:
2889:
2882:
2878:
2874:
2870:
2866:
2865:
2864:
2863:
2857:
2850:
2811:
2807:
2803:
2799:
2796:
2793:
2790:
2789:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2780:
2773:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2759:
2755:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2724:
2723:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2694:
2688:
2681:
2673:
2672:
2671:
2667:
2663:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2624:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2609:
2606:
2602:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2594:
2593:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2554:
2553:
2552:
2548:
2544:
2539:
2538:
2537:
2536:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2517:
2511:
2504:
2496:
2492:
2488:
2484:
2483:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2448:
2447:
2446:
2440:
2433:
2425:
2421:
2420:1,300 sources
2417:
2416:
2415:
2411:
2407:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2393:
2386:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2362:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2338:
2337:
2333:
2328:
2325:
2320:
2315:
2314:
2311:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2294:WP:COMMONNAME
2291:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2231:
2227:
2226:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2212:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2195:Gun Powder Ma
2192:
2190:
2185:
2180:
2172:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2031:
2030:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2010:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1995:
1992:
1991:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1963:
1962:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1940:WP:COMMONNAME
1937:
1936:WP:COMMONNAME
1933:
1929:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1906:
1905:WP:Commonname
1902:
1898:
1894:
1891:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1880:Gun Powder Ma
1876:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1855:WP:Commonname
1852:
1849:
1848:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1834:Gun Powder Ma
1830:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1769:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1754:Gun Powder Ma
1750:
1749:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1689:Gun Powder Ma
1686:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1671:
1668:
1667:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1624:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1602:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1564:
1563:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1522:WP:COMMONNAME
1519:
1516:
1514:
1510:
1509:WP:COMMONNAME
1506:
1503:
1501:
1497:
1496:WP:COMMONNAME
1493:
1490:
1489:
1486:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1440:
1439:WP:COMMONNAME
1435:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1423:
1421:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1365:
1364:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1320:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1290:post above):
1289:
1285:
1284:WP:COMMONNAME
1281:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1195:
1192:
1189:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1179:
1176:
1173:
1170:
1167:
1166:
1162:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1153:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1049:in english.--
1048:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:Nightstallion
1009:per Checco. —
1008:
1005:
1004:
999:
995:
991:
986:
983:
982:
981:
980:
975:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
954:
953:
949:
945:
940:
937:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
918:WP:COMMONNAME
915:
912:
907:
903:
899:
894:
893:
892:
888:
884:
878:
872:
868:
865:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
846:WP:COMMONNAME
843:
839:
836:; and 83 for
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
804:
803:
802:
801:
797:
793:
789:
785:
781:
776:
775:
771:
767:
763:
756:
753:
748:
743:
742:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
718:
717:
716:
714:
710:
706:
702:
692:Fix the names
691:
666:
662:
660:
659:
654:
652:
648:
646:
645:
640:
638:
634:
632:
631:
626:
624:
620:
618:
617:
612:
610:
606:
604:
603:
598:
596:
592:
590:
589:
584:
582:
578:
576:
575:
570:
568:
564:
562:
561:
556:
553:
549:
543:
537:
535:
534:
529:
527:
523:
519:
517:
516:
511:
510:
507:
503:
499:
498:
495:
494:
490:
489:
485:
481:
477:
471:
468:
467:
464:
447:
443:
439:
438:
430:
419:
417:
414:
410:
409:
405:
399:
396:
393:
389:
376:
372:
366:
363:
362:
359:
342:
338:
334:
333:
325:
314:
312:
309:
305:
304:
300:
294:
291:
288:
284:
279:
275:
269:
261:
260:
250:
246:
241:
240:
221:
220:
217:
213:
209:
206:
204:
200:
199:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
137:
136:
128:
127:Verifiability
125:
123:
120:
118:
115:
114:
113:
104:
100:
98:
95:
93:
89:
86:
84:
81:
80:
74:
70:
69:Learn to edit
66:
63:
58:
57:
54:
53:
49:
43:
39:
35:
34:
25:
19:
3513:
3491:
3488:
3463:source check
3442:
3436:
3433:
3386:
3383:
3341:
3337:
3316:— Preceding
3311:
3274:— Preceding
3270:
3267:
3253:
3197:
3192:
3187:
3181:
3058:WP:GOODFAITH
2973:
2969:
2965:
2961:
2957:
2953:
2949:
2945:
2941:
2937:
2933:
2891:
2883:Disputed map
2842:
2610:
2600:
2494:
2423:
2368:
2366:
2323:
2316:
2289:
2271:
2270:
2229:
2188:
2187:
2183:
2067:
2044:
2041:common usage
2040:
2036:
2032:
2013:
1993:
1971:User:Fantasy
1892:
1874:
1850:
1828:
1795:
1705:
1673:
1669:
1648:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1615:english name
1614:
1610:
1587:
1584:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1565:
1541:
1533:
1517:
1504:
1491:
1484:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1426:
1419:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1386:
1295:
1291:
1288:Mai-Sachme's
1246:
1242:
1224:
1220:
1215:
1211:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1020:
1006:
938:
921:
913:
866:
805:
787:
778:
761:
759:
751:
744:
699:— Preceding
695:
656:
655:
642:
641:
628:
627:
614:
613:
600:
599:
586:
585:
572:
571:
558:
557:
531:
530:
513:
512:
475:
435:
370:
330:
324:Italy portal
274:WikiProjects
257:
201:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
111:
36:This is the
3571:Article 116
3553:Article 131
3532:South Tyrol
2373:South Tyrol
1859:South Tyrol
1630:South Tyrol
1456:South Tyrol
1407:South Tyrol
1403:South Tyrol
1395:South Tyrol
1296:in English
1266:Biel/Bienne
1210:The use of
1134:South Tyrol
1072:South Tyrol
1043:South Tyrol
962:South Tyrol
840:. Finally,
165:free images
48:not a forum
3596:Categories
3575:Mai-Sachme
3557:Holapaco77
3500:Report bug
3346:Mai-Sachme
3299:Mai-Sachme
3256:Gryffindor
3204:Thanks. --
3182:disclaimer
3062:Gryffindor
2984:Mai-Sachme
2418:How about
2147:Gryffindor
2109:Gryffindor
1979:Gryffindor
1967:User:Taalo
1914:Gryffindor
1910:User:Taalo
1739:Gryffindor
1588:in English
1427:Alto Adige
1399:Alto Adige
1270:Gryffindor
1245:more than
1163:2001-2010
990:Gryffindor
944:Gryffindor
926:Mai-Sachme
842:this ngram
828:; 192 for
816:; 576 for
812:; 894 for
788:in English
630:Notability
579:Listed at
3483:this tool
3476:this tool
2752:Tyrol".--
2369:all of it
2018:Autospark
1243:currently
1160:1991-2000
1157:1981-1990
832:; 65 for
451:Geography
442:geography
398:Geography
262:is rated
105:if needed
88:Be polite
38:talk page
3489:Cheers.—
3338:politics
3318:unsigned
3276:unsigned
3223:Patavium
3206:Patavium
3136:Patavium
3122:Patavium
3108:Patavium
3076:Patavium
3040:Patavium
2915:Patavium
2869:Dohn joe
2848:Director
2802:Patavium
2771:Director
2739:Patavium
2679:Director
2662:August90
2615:Patavium
2543:Patavium
2502:Director
2473:Dohn joe
2431:Director
2384:Director
2349:noclador
2345:Trentino
2250:Patavium
2235:noclador
2216:Patavium
2163:Patavium
2133:Patavium
2087:Patavium
2049:Patavium
1998:Darwinek
1948:Dohn joe
1863:Trentino
1798:noclador
1773:Dohn joe
1725:Dohn joe
1710:noclador
1634:Trentino
1592:Dohn joe
1547:noclador
1300:Dohn joe
1252:Dohn joe
1138:Südtirol
1130:Südtirol
1110:noclador
966:Dohn joe
898:Dohn joe
854:Dohn joe
792:Dohn joe
724:noclador
701:unsigned
203:Archives
73:get help
46:This is
44:article.
3393:my edit
2962:tedesco
2556:name.--
2491:WP:NPOV
2424:despise
2302:Dolovis
2191:English
2033:Comment
1944:WP:NPOV
1893:Comment
1670:Comment
1566:Comment
1536:as per
1485:Comment
1064:Comment
914:Support
850:WP:NCGN
806:Support
602:Infobox
560:Cleanup
478:on the
373:on the
264:C-class
171:WP refs
159:scholar
3536:Checco
3090:Sajoch
3001:Sajoch
2968:) and
2966:German
2950:German
2754:Sajoch
2558:Sajoch
2497:name.
2455:Sajoch
2406:Sajoch
2272:Oppose
2072:Sajoch
2014:oppose
1994:Oppose
1875:Oppose
1814:Sajoch
1653:Sajoch
1580:Also,
1464:Sajoch
1369:Checco
1353:Sajoch
1333:Checco
1229:Sajoch
1091:Sajoch
1051:Sajoch
1039:Oppose
1026:Bejnar
1021:Oppose
1007:Oppose
939:Oppose
883:Checco
867:Oppose
533:Assess
270:scale.
143:Google
2605:WP:EN
2487:WP:EN
2471:. :)
2377:WP:EN
2012:Also
1351:it.--
1193:3930
658:Stubs
644:Photo
346:Italy
337:Italy
293:Italy
251:This
186:JSTOR
147:books
101:Seek
16:<
3579:talk
3569:And
3561:talk
3540:talk
3521:talk
3368:talk
3350:talk
3326:talk
3303:talk
3284:talk
3260:talk
3227:talk
3210:talk
3140:talk
3126:talk
3112:talk
3094:talk
3080:talk
3066:talk
3044:talk
3005:talk
2988:talk
2919:talk
2873:talk
2855:talk
2806:talk
2778:talk
2758:talk
2743:talk
2686:talk
2666:talk
2619:talk
2562:talk
2547:talk
2509:talk
2489:and
2477:talk
2459:talk
2438:talk
2422:? I
2410:talk
2391:talk
2353:talk
2306:talk
2280:talk
2254:talk
2239:talk
2220:talk
2199:talk
2167:talk
2151:talk
2137:talk
2113:talk
2091:talk
2076:talk
2053:talk
2022:talk
2002:talk
1983:talk
1973:and
1952:talk
1930:and
1918:talk
1884:talk
1869:and
1838:talk
1829:real
1818:talk
1802:talk
1777:talk
1758:talk
1743:talk
1729:talk
1714:talk
1693:talk
1680:here
1678:and
1676:here
1657:talk
1596:talk
1551:talk
1511:nor
1468:talk
1430:way.
1373:talk
1357:talk
1337:talk
1328:here
1324:here
1304:talk
1286:(or
1274:talk
1256:talk
1233:talk
1190:5080
1187:3750
1177:322
1114:talk
1095:talk
1055:talk
1030:talk
994:talk
970:talk
948:talk
930:talk
916:per
902:talk
887:talk
858:talk
848:and
796:talk
770:talk
728:talk
709:talk
663:See
649:See
635:See
621:See
607:See
593:See
565:See
550:and
524:and
520:See
365:High
179:FENS
153:news
90:and
3457:RfC
3427:to
3417:to
3407:to
2845:--
2768:--
2676:--
2601:any
2499:--
2428:--
2381:--
2321:.
2230:had
1946:.)
1649:new
1632:or
1542:not
1227:.--
1174:110
960:to
873:).
616:Map
470:Mid
193:TWL
3598::
3581:)
3563:)
3542:)
3523:)
3470:.
3465:}}
3461:{{
3370:)
3352:)
3344:--
3340::
3328:)
3305:)
3297:--
3286:)
3262:)
3229:)
3212:)
3142:)
3128:)
3114:)
3096:)
3082:)
3068:)
3046:)
3007:)
2990:)
2921:)
2875:)
2808:)
2760:)
2745:)
2668:)
2621:)
2564:)
2549:)
2479:)
2461:)
2453:--
2412:)
2355:)
2347:.
2308:)
2282:)
2256:)
2241:)
2222:)
2201:)
2193:.
2189:in
2169:)
2153:)
2139:)
2115:)
2093:)
2078:)
2055:)
2024:)
2004:)
1985:)
1954:)
1920:)
1903:.
1886:)
1865:,
1861:,
1840:)
1820:)
1804:)
1779:)
1760:)
1745:)
1731:)
1716:)
1695:)
1659:)
1598:)
1553:)
1494:=
1470:)
1375:)
1359:)
1339:)
1306:)
1276:)
1258:)
1235:)
1171:26
1116:)
1097:)
1057:)
1032:)
1024:--
996:)
972:)
950:)
932:)
924:--
920::
904:)
889:)
881:--
860:)
798:)
782:→
772:)
749:.
730:)
711:)
544:}}
540:{{
214:,
210:,
173:)
71:;
3577:(
3559:(
3538:(
3519:(
3502:)
3498:(
3485:.
3478:.
3366:(
3348:(
3324:(
3301:(
3282:(
3258:(
3225:(
3208:(
3184::
3138:(
3124:(
3110:(
3092:(
3078:(
3064:(
3042:(
3003:(
2986:(
2972:(
2964:(
2956:(
2944:(
2936:(
2917:(
2871:(
2858:)
2852:(
2804:(
2781:)
2775:(
2756:(
2741:(
2689:)
2683:(
2664:(
2617:(
2607:.
2560:(
2545:(
2512:)
2506:(
2475:(
2457:(
2441:)
2435:(
2408:(
2394:)
2388:(
2351:(
2304:(
2278:(
2252:(
2237:(
2218:(
2197:(
2165:(
2149:(
2135:(
2111:(
2089:(
2074:(
2051:(
2020:(
2000:(
1981:(
1950:(
1916:(
1882:(
1836:(
1816:(
1800:(
1775:(
1756:(
1741:(
1727:(
1712:(
1691:(
1655:(
1594:(
1549:(
1466:(
1441:.
1371:(
1355:(
1335:(
1302:(
1272:(
1254:(
1231:(
1112:(
1093:(
1053:(
1028:(
992:(
968:(
946:(
928:(
900:(
885:(
856:(
794:(
768:(
726:(
707:(
661::
647::
633::
619::
605::
591::
577::
563::
554:.
536::
518::
482:.
377:.
276::
216:3
212:2
208:1
205::
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
75:.
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.