Knowledge

Talk:Tsirelson space

Source đź“ť

84: 74: 53: 22: 193:
Its an honour to have you comment. Articles in Knowledge may often be incomplete or stilted; knowledgable readers are invited to make corrections and additions. In time, it is hoped that a number of editors can fashion an article that is more complete, accurate and comprehensive than any one person
173:
1989 Casazza, Shura "Tsirelson's space" 1994 Gowers "A solution to Banach's hyperplane problem" 1994 Odell, Schlumprecht "The distortion problem" 1995 Odell, Schlumprecht "Distortion and stabilized structure..." 1996 Gowers "A new dichotomy for Banach spaces" 2001 Ortiz "An omitting
298:
uniformly convex, as the article has said since its very beginning. On the contrary, Tsirelson's original paper clearly shows that the space has no infinite dimensional subspace that is isomorphic (as a Banach space) to a uniformly convex space. I just thought I'd make that clear here, in case
169:
3. About your references. Among more than 100 relevant papers you selected three (Tsirelson 1974; Figiel, Johnson 1974; Spinka 2002). I wonder, what is your selection criterion? Is the polynomial reflexivity of S(T) more important or relevant than such works as
165:
2. I bother that your definition of T leaves the reader in doubt about existence and uniqueness of T, since nothing is stated about existence and uniqueness of V. In fact, such V as you define exists (which is not evident!) but is not unique.
417:
For two reasons. First, it is not a good idea, to write here about oneself. Second, if the only editor that wish and can to describe a topic here is the author then probably the topic is not worth to be described here.
262:. As can be seen from Tsirelson's comments above, the page could need some more work, but I don't feel qualified. (But I went back and added a word about the existence and nonuniqueness of V.) 140: 260: 227: 451: 130: 355:
satisfies 1-4, so what? You have to wait "weakly compact", somewhat hidden outside what seems to be the main point, to get to the real thing.
106: 446: 315:; sorry, being quite young in 1974 I did not know that this notation for the space of bounded sequences is not at all universally accepted. 309: 97: 58: 229:
after a cursory look at Tsirelson's paper. There, he apparently uses m for an arbitrary sequence space, but quickly specialises to
33: 330: 202:
I went and did a little editing: There was a mysterious, undefined m in the definition. I replaced it with
39: 83: 308:
Here is a good source (containing three correct definitions, with existence and uniqueness ensured):
21: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89: 73: 52: 377:
such set is exactly the definition. Clearly, this article was written by careless non-experts.
395:
Ah! I see that you make a point not to edit this article yourself !!! Anonymous best regards,
423: 382: 337: 320: 232: 205: 181: 400: 363: 180:
4. More than 100 such references are collected on the relevant page of my site, here:
440: 275: 419: 378: 333: 316: 300: 278: 266: 187: 102: 195: 79: 396: 359: 427: 404: 386: 367: 341: 324: 303: 281: 269: 351:
I don't much like the way the space is introduced: the unit ball of c
287: 291: 299:
someone is watching the page for changes and wishes to object.
15: 276:
Gowers: A metamathematical question in Banach space theory
286:
Oy. Whatever anonymous person who edited the entry on
235: 208: 183:
Maybe, an external link to it could be appropriate.
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 254: 221: 311:. It also eliminates the need of this mysterious 174:types theorem for positive bounded formulas..." 358:Why not say that A is the "smallest" such set? 162:1. Thank you for your interest in `my space'. 8: 47: 294:, what a good catch! Tsirelson space is 246: 234: 213: 207: 49: 19: 7: 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 452:Low-priority mathematics articles 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 135:This article has been rated as 1: 325:07:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 447:B-Class mathematics articles 270:00:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 468: 428:11:58, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 405:10:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 387:10:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 368:08:18, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 282:09:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 342:10:34, 13 June 2010 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 304:21:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 198:05:24, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) 141:project's priority scale 255:{\displaystyle m=c_{0}} 98:WikiProject Mathematics 274:Maybe also look here: 256: 223: 28:This article is rated 257: 224: 222:{\displaystyle c_{0}} 329:And another source: 233: 206: 194:can easily achieve. 121:mathematics articles 252: 219: 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 373:Yes, indeed! The 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 459: 261: 259: 258: 253: 251: 250: 228: 226: 225: 220: 218: 217: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 467: 466: 462: 461: 460: 458: 457: 456: 437: 436: 420:Boris Tsirelson 379:Boris Tsirelson 354: 349: 334:Boris Tsirelson 317:Boris Tsirelson 279:Boris Tsirelson 242: 231: 230: 209: 204: 203: 188:Boris Tsirelson 175: 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 465: 463: 455: 454: 449: 439: 438: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 410: 409: 408: 407: 390: 389: 352: 348: 345: 249: 245: 241: 238: 216: 212: 200: 199: 172: 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 464: 453: 450: 448: 445: 444: 442: 429: 425: 421: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 406: 402: 398: 394: 393: 392: 391: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 371: 370: 369: 365: 361: 356: 346: 344: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 305: 302: 297: 296:certainly not 293: 289: 284: 283: 280: 277: 272: 271: 268: 263: 247: 243: 239: 236: 214: 210: 197: 192: 191: 190: 189: 184: 182: 178: 171: 167: 163: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 374: 357: 350: 328: 312: 307: 295: 285: 273: 264: 201: 185: 179: 177:and others? 176: 168: 164: 161: 137:Low-priority 136: 96: 62:Low‑priority 40:WikiProjects 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 441:Categories 375:smallest 347:Question 158:Comments 139:on the 30:B-class 301:Hanche 288:31 May 267:Hanche 36:scale. 196:linas 424:talk 401:talk 397:Bdmy 383:talk 364:talk 360:Bdmy 338:talk 321:talk 292:2007 131:Low 443:: 426:) 403:) 385:) 366:) 340:) 332:. 323:) 290:, 265:-- 186:-- 422:( 399:( 381:( 362:( 353:0 336:( 319:( 313:m 248:0 244:c 240:= 237:m 215:0 211:c 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale

Boris Tsirelson
linas
Hanche
00:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Gowers: A metamathematical question in Banach space theory
Boris Tsirelson
09:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
31 May
2007
Hanche
21:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Boris Tsirelson
talk
07:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑