712:, sorry I missed your message, just saw it. Thanks Nikki Maria for putting the tags on the images. I actually missed the author being mentioned on the flickr photo, my mistake. I do have a question, can we actually AGF for images that are presented as "own work" but which aren't verifiable as being such in any way? You said it yourself, the "copyright of the photographer needs to be considered", well, it's possible that somebody is claiming the work as being their own without it actually being their own. If AGF is appropriate, fine by me,
529:
249:
575:
476:
345:"Such intersecting Martian and solar orbits meant that there could be no solid rotating celestial spheres, because they could not possibly interpenetrate. Arguably this conclusion was independently supported by the conclusion that the comet of 1577 was superlunary, because it showed less daily parallax than the Moon and thus must pass through any celestial spheres in its transit." Requires citations.
601:
452:
430:
408:
370:
219:
197:
138:
116:
359:
351:
331:
316:
308:
300:
274:
867:
with the citations when you get the chance and check the remaining images as well. Give the article a general copy-edit and then resubmit for GA. Hopefully you'll get a proper GA review the next time. Sorry about this, but, it could stretch out indefinitely if we let it. Good luck, this article is one that you've put a lot of effort into.
730:
Generally speaking: if you have reason to think that an image presented as "own work" isn't, you should raise that for discussion - it does happen. However, if there's no reason to think otherwise, then yes, we assume the uploader was telling the truth. Consider: if you went on vacation, photographed
389:
There is a false flag for a copyright violation when using Earwig's
Copyvio Detector, the material that is being caught by the detector has been present in this article for longer than it has existed elsewhere on the internet. That said, I will also be doing my own checks for copyright violations and
866:
I'll close the GA/R as having failed. Excellent effort was put into this article, however, the hasty initial GA review failed to identify any of the problems the article had, let alone give time for these to be addressed. As it's been a couple months I can only suggest that you take the time to deal
621:
For the image licenses could you explain a little what the problems are and how to fix them? For example what is the problem with image 15 which was uploaded as authors own work - how can anyone be expected to identify that the uploader actually made the image, and does AGF not apply to uploads of
342:"His system also offered a major innovation: while both the purely geocentric model and the heliocentric model as set forth by Copernicus relied on the idea of transparent rotating crystalline spheres to carry the planets in their orbits, Tycho eliminated the spheres entirely." Requires a citation.
83:
The article assessor as a new editor was unable to provide a sufficiently critical assessment of this article. As such, I will be doing a re-assessment for this article. At the end of this review I will either Keep or De-list this article from GA status. Normally I would place a complete review of
786:
parts of my assessment for citations hasn't been met - there are still a number of sentences that lack citations though many of the above have been dealt with in some form or another. There are two images that still need addressing as well - File:Libr0309.jpg and File:Brahe notebook.jpg.
669:
File:Libr0309.jpg: PD-1923 added - you can verify this by looking at the image itself, as it's the frontispiece for a published book. Under US law a simple reproduction of a 2D work does not warrant a new copyright, so we need only consider the status of the original work and not the
622:
this kind? Also as far as I know wikipedians who upload in their username get credited to their username and they do so through the link to the image, not in the caption. It is also quite suprising to me that photos of 16th century documents need additional licensing other than PD.
313:"An ally of the king and friendly with Queen Sophie (both his mother Beate Bille and adoptive mother Inger Oxe had been her court maids), he secured a promise from the King that ownership of Hven and Uraniborg would pass to his heirs." Needs a citation.
336:"Cat D represents an unprecedented confluence of skills: instrumental, observational, & computational—all of which combined to enable Tycho to place most of his hundreds of recorded stars to an accuracy of ordermag 1'!"" Requires a citation.
328:"Rawlins (1993:§B2) asserts of Tycho's Star Catalog D, "In it, Tycho achieved, on a mass scale, a precision far beyond that of earlier catalogers." Quotes require in-line citations. (the parenthesis already is a linked inline citation)
677:
for sculptural works; thus, only the copyright of the photographer need be considered, not that of the original creator. While it may well be useful to provide further information on the original work, it isn't mandatory.
562:
Image 16 also a glaring problem; as the author is not stated and no information is given about the image that would suggest that the article is in the public domain. This includes; date, source, author,
339:"Incorrect transcription in the final published star catalogue, by scribes in Brahe's employ, was the source of even larger errors, sometimes by many degrees." Has a note, but, requires a citation.
239:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
236:
348:"The lunar crater Tycho is named in his honour, as is the crater Tycho Brahe on Mars and the minor planet 1677 Tycho Brahe in the asteroid belt." Appears to require a citation.
125:
163:
791:, when would you be able to address the remaining items for 3a and 6a so that I can go through the article a second time around and confirm the other criteria?
636:
Can we use file name rather than image number so we all clearly know which images are being discussed? I think the numbering above excluded the signature image
546:
356:"and the Tycho Brahe Planetarium in Copenhagen is also named after him." Appears to be an obvious observation, would be good to have a citation for it though.
84:
the article into the below review box, however, in this instance I will go criterion by criterion from the most pressing issue to the least pressing issue.
167:
159:
651:
File:Brahe_notebook.jpg: there is a source already provided which gives further information; however, it isn't clear to me that PD-1923 would be correct
151:
594:
All of the images have appropriate captions and are relevant to the topic. That said, many of these images may not remain following this review.
588:
66:
155:
305:"Among his predictions was bloodshed in Moscow and the imminent fall of Ivan the Terrible by 1583." Has a note, but, needs a citation.
462:
62:
379:
258:
538:
47:
805:
Sorry, I am almost back from wiki break, but I will need another week untill after the 17th before I begin work on this again.
673:
File:Brahe_kepler.jpg: this image is fine and needs no modification. The statue is located in the Czech
Republic, which has
550:
228:
39:
232:
147:
264:
There are many passages within the article that lack the necessary in-line citations, these passages are noted below;
853:
I didn't get the time I thought I would. You can close the review if you think it will make the world a better place.
542:
495:
The article is in a stable condition and there do not appear to be outstanding disputes on the article talk page.
439:
182:
642:
File:Tycho_Cas_SN1572.jpg: tag added, the person who did the retouching is identified in the file history section
489:
417:
752:, have a picture of yourself taking the picture. I kid of course. Fair enough, question raised and answered.
383:
844:
774:
872:
823:
796:
757:
740:
721:
683:
674:
559:
Image 7 needs a PD-1923 licence, however, it also requires Author, Date, Description and a Source.
515:
511:
584:
519:
205:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
206:
93:
858:
840:
810:
783:
770:
769:, it's been four weeks since this has been updated. What is the status of the reassessment?
701:
627:
55:
17:
868:
836:
819:
792:
766:
753:
749:
736:
717:
679:
466:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
657:
File:Tycho_Brahe_Grave_DSCN2900.jpg: author and date are already clearly provided
854:
832:
806:
788:
709:
697:
623:
32:
839:, it's been another month without any work on the article. Any news? Thanks.
438:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
488:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
876:
861:
848:
827:
813:
800:
778:
761:
744:
725:
704:
687:
630:
556:
The other quite pressing issue is with the many images in this article;
358:
350:
330:
315:
307:
299:
273:
663:
File:Fotothek_df_tg_0005918_Astronomie_^_Messinstrument.jpg: tag added
660:
File:Fotothek_df_tg_0005915_Astronomie_^_Messinstrument.jpg: tag added
654:
File:Astronomiae_Instauratae_Progymnasmata.jpg: tag added
290:
needs to be cited, to as many sources as are applicable.
731:
a cool sculpture and uploaded the image, how might you
74:
43:
242:Criterion currently impossible to review due 2c.
212:Criterion currently impossible to review due 2c.
126:understandable to an appropriately broad audience
714:I think all the other images have been resolved
648:File:Tycho-Brahe-Mural-Quadrant.jpg: tag added
818:Understood, and I have no problem with this.
293:The last sentences of the first paragraph of
8:
267:The last sentence of the first paragraph of
716:wait, the notebook image as well is left.
390:will note here if I come across anything.
86:
279:The last sentence of the paragraph of
645:File:Uraniborgskiss_90.jpg: tag added
7:
567:Many of the images are problematic.
128:; spelling and grammar are correct.
124:. the prose is clear, concise, and
666:File:Naboth_Capella.JPG: tag added
600:
451:
429:
407:
369:
218:
196:
137:
115:
24:
281:Marriage to Kirsten Jorgensdatter
599:
573:
527:
474:
450:
428:
406:
368:
357:
349:
329:
314:
306:
298:
272:
247:
217:
195:
136:
114:
639:File:Tycho_Brahe.JPG: tag added
237:could reasonably be challenged
1:
877:14:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
862:20:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
849:19:57, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
762:02:19, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
745:02:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
726:21:37, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
705:15:13, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
688:15:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
631:08:33, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
547:valid non-free use rationales
828:05:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
814:20:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
735:that you took that picture?
574:
528:
475:
248:
801:11:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
779:00:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
469:Criterion awaiting review.
445:Criterion awaiting review.
423:Criterion awaiting review.
173:Criterion awaiting review.
131:Criterion awaiting review.
917:
207:the layout style guideline
499:
394:
177:
102:
92:
286:The entire paragraph of
89:
587:to the topic, and have
323:Observational astronomy
321:The first paragraph of
146:. it complies with the
399:Broad in its coverage
492:or content dispute.
380:copyright violations
259:no original research
188:no original research
675:freedom of panorama
416:. it addresses the
325:requires citations.
235:. All content that
611:Overall assessment
543:copyright statuses
506:, if possible, by
288:The 1572 supernova
271:needs a citation.
168:list incorporation
619:
618:
589:suitable captions
549:are provided for
378:. it contains no
283:needs a citation.
908:
603:
602:
577:
576:
551:non-free content
531:
530:
478:
477:
454:
453:
432:
431:
410:
409:
372:
371:
361:
353:
333:
318:
310:
302:
276:
251:
250:
229:reliable sources
221:
220:
199:
198:
140:
139:
118:
117:
87:
79:
70:
51:
18:Talk:Tycho Brahe
916:
915:
911:
910:
909:
907:
906:
905:
297:need citations.
150:guidelines for
148:Manual of Style
98:Review Comment
60:
37:
31:
29:
27:GA Reassessment
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
914:
912:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
691:
690:
671:
667:
664:
661:
658:
655:
652:
649:
646:
643:
640:
617:
616:
614:
604:
596:
595:
592:
578:
570:
569:
565:
564:
560:
554:
532:
524:
523:
497:
496:
493:
479:
471:
470:
467:
455:
447:
446:
443:
433:
425:
424:
421:
420:of the topic.
411:
403:
402:
392:
391:
387:
373:
365:
364:
363:
362:
354:
346:
343:
340:
337:
334:
326:
319:
311:
303:
291:
284:
277:
262:
257:. it contains
252:
244:
243:
240:
222:
214:
213:
210:
200:
192:
191:
175:
174:
171:
160:words to watch
141:
133:
132:
129:
119:
111:
110:
100:
99:
96:
91:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
913:
878:
874:
870:
865:
864:
863:
860:
856:
852:
851:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
831:
830:
829:
825:
821:
817:
816:
815:
812:
808:
804:
803:
802:
798:
794:
790:
785:
782:
781:
780:
776:
772:
768:
765:
764:
763:
759:
755:
751:
748:
747:
746:
742:
738:
734:
729:
728:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
708:
707:
706:
703:
699:
695:
694:
693:
692:
689:
685:
681:
676:
672:
668:
665:
662:
659:
656:
653:
650:
647:
644:
641:
638:
637:
635:
634:
633:
632:
629:
625:
615:
612:
608:
605:
598:
597:
593:
590:
586:
582:
579:
572:
571:
568:
561:
558:
557:
555:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
533:
526:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
502:
498:
494:
491:
487:
483:
480:
473:
472:
468:
465:
464:
459:
456:
449:
448:
444:
441:
440:summary style
437:
434:
427:
426:
422:
419:
415:
412:
405:
404:
400:
397:
393:
388:
385:
381:
377:
374:
367:
366:
360:
355:
352:
347:
344:
341:
338:
335:
332:
327:
324:
320:
317:
312:
309:
304:
301:
296:
292:
289:
285:
282:
278:
275:
270:
266:
265:
263:
260:
256:
253:
246:
245:
241:
238:
234:
230:
226:
223:
216:
215:
211:
208:
204:
201:
194:
193:
189:
185:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
152:lead sections
149:
145:
142:
135:
134:
130:
127:
123:
120:
113:
112:
108:
105:
101:
97:
95:
88:
85:
81:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
732:
713:
620:
610:
606:
583:. media are
580:
566:
563:description.
537:. media are
534:
507:
503:
500:
485:
481:
461:
457:
435:
418:main aspects
413:
398:
395:
375:
322:
295:Lord of Hven
294:
287:
280:
268:
254:
233:cited inline
224:
202:
187:
181:
178:
143:
121:
107:Well-written
106:
103:
82:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
841:BlueMoonset
784:BlueMoonset
771:BlueMoonset
541:with their
504:Illustrated
269:Early years
44:visual edit
869:Mr rnddude
837:Mr rnddude
820:Mr rnddude
793:Mr rnddude
767:Mr rnddude
754:Mr rnddude
750:Nikkimaria
737:Nikkimaria
718:Mr rnddude
680:Nikkimaria
384:plagiarism
183:Verifiable
94:Attribute
585:relevant
510:such as
490:edit war
859:snunɐɯ·
855:·maunus
811:snunɐɯ·
807:·maunus
702:snunɐɯ·
698:·maunus
696:Thanks!
628:snunɐɯ·
624:·maunus
463:Neutral
164:fiction
67:history
48:history
34:Article
833:Maunus
789:Maunus
710:Maunus
545:, and
539:tagged
512:images
486:Stable
166:, and
156:layout
733:prove
520:audio
518:, or
516:video
508:media
186:with
90:Rate
76:Watch
16:<
873:talk
845:talk
824:talk
797:talk
775:talk
758:talk
741:talk
722:talk
684:talk
670:scan
231:are
63:edit
40:edit
442:).
382:or
875:)
857:·
847:)
835:,
826:)
809:·
799:)
777:)
760:)
743:)
724:)
700:·
686:)
626:·
613:.
609:.
591:.
581:6b
553:.
535:6a
522::
514:,
501:6.
484:.
460:.
436:3b
414:3a
401::
396:3.
386:.
376:2d
261:.
255:2c
227:.
225:2b
209:.
203:2a
190::
179:2.
170:.
162:,
158:,
154:,
144:1b
122:1a
109::
104:1.
65:|
46:|
42:|
871:(
843:(
822:(
795:(
773:(
756:(
739:(
720:(
682:(
607:7
482:5
458:4
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
