84:
74:
53:
22:
288:
general conventions in mathematical notation (such as the use of single-letter names for variables, but multi-letter names for specific functions and operators; various uses of super- and subscripts; parentheses; function application; infix|postfix|ambifix operators; ellipses; abuse of notation; ...). In my opinion the latter topic — conventions in mathematical notation — warrants a separate article.
261:. Did this exist before? I think somewhere a bit more should be said about that. E.g. the standard use (almost "meaning") of \epsilon, and also e.g. "x,y" for real variables against "k,m,n,..." for integer variables. (Just ran across the latter). Information on this is quite dispersed; this page and other existing pages (
287:
Although the topics may have some overlap, I think it is worthwhile to distinguish between typographical conventions (how formulae are actually typeset: how the font size of a superscript relates to the main text; when three dots are raised or on the baseline; where thin spaces are inserted; ...) and
511:
seems the only way for fixing these issues and some more for which the article is not tagged. Indeed, despite its title, the article contains nothing about typography (except a citation of Knuth), and does not present any commonly used typographical convention (if any exists), as it talks only on
454:
I have added the reference of the AMS stye guide to the article, but the article must be totally rewritten to follow this style guide, and to clarify its diffference with other recommendations and other conventions that are used outside mathematics. (As "mathematical" appears in the article title,
408:
By the way, I forgot to add that although international conventions are becoming established, historically I imagine there may have been very large differences between typographical conventions in mathematical formulæ around the world, in places as diverse as the Middle East, India, Japan, South
354:
I've added a
Globalize tag since this article explicitly states repeated that the conventions apply only to America. However I'm not actually convinced that they do (!) and if anyone can give an authoritative answer saying that they are not then we can probably remove the tag.
184:
Please add more information about mathematical typography, and in particular about the parts that are different between
American and European style. For example, I'm given to understand that many European journals use upright Latin letters and/or italic Greek letters?
377:
isn't strictly international, but it conforms to the other two citations), and a new section. I trust other editors will respect this contribution that is backed by very reputable references, even if the editor themself doesn't use the conventions
196:
I'm
European, but I've no idea how European conventions should differ from what's presented as American in the article. (I must confess I've never publshed anything in a European journal, however.) Is there really any difference here? (Well, I say
158:
140:
530:. This does not mean that there is no need of an article about typography in mathematics, but, presently, there is more on this subject in the proposed target than in this article.
451:
are totally ignored, although AMS is a major authority for mathematics, and the authorities that are cited are generally not recognized, and even ignored by mathematicians.
235:
215:
553:
558:
130:
106:
455:
more emphasis must be given to the conventions that are used in mathematics than to the conventions that are used in other scientific areas.)
388:
attempted to cover issues such as "How close should an integral sign be written to a fraction bar?" or "When should we use '÷', and when '/'?"
336:
370:
I think the point is that the text is pointedly written as applying to the USA, and there are no citations or examples to suggest otherwise.
417:
392:
165:, and the two links on the article is my idea. I think both are good ideas and both this article and my two articles should be merged!
262:
97:
58:
490:
448:
33:
539:
464:
425:
400:
364:
344:
330:
315:
296:
277:
246:
258:
188:
I don't know if this article should turn into "dos and don'ts of math writing," but if it does, I've got plenty. :) --
340:
421:
396:
311:
21:
527:
521:
513:
360:
39:
83:
483:
173:
I've added some rudimentary information on
American mathematical typography. I wish I could locate
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
535:
460:
307:
89:
73:
52:
327:
292:
356:
220:
189:
200:
237:; I say 0,5 and you say 0.5 - so let's call the whole thing off... But other than taht?)--
547:
531:
508:
456:
441:
274:
242:
162:
517:
303:
289:
174:
102:
79:
520:
and/or disputed, everything that remains is more accurately described in
270:
238:
374:
335:
Yes, please tell us the joke. It's not fair to tease like that.
266:
507:
This article is tagged for multiple issues for several years.
178:
15:
159:
Roman letters used in mathematics votes for deleation article
177:'s lecture notes on "Mathematical typography"; I found a
373:
I've added some international citations (well, actually
516:. If one removes form the article everything that is
381:
I've tried to summarise key points in layman's terms.
223:
203:
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
283:
Typographical conventions or notational conventions
181:of them online one time, but don't remember where.
229:
209:
482:Letourneau, Mary; Wright Sharp, Jennifer (2017).
326:I can't find this joke anywhere? What is it?
8:
384:As alluded to in another post, I too have
265:) are not featured richly enough on this,
47:
526:Therefore, I’ll redirect this article to
222:
202:
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
474:
49:
447:, because the recommendations of the
161:, this article was the brainchild of
95:This redirect is within the scope of
19:
7:
554:Redirect-Class mathematics articles
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
559:Low-priority mathematics articles
263:Roman letters used in mathematics
169:American and European differences
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
135:This redirect has been rated as
118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
82:
72:
51:
20:
437:I have tagged the article with
503:Making this article a redirect
1:
540:09:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
491:American Mathematical Society
449:American Mathematical Society
247:21:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
109:and see a list of open tasks.
426:04:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
401:04:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
575:
345:12:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
316:03:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
278:17:30, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
331:06:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
297:03:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
134:
67:
46:
465:10:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
365:09:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
192:22:56, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
141:project's priority scale
257:I noticed the red link
230:{\displaystyle \times }
98:WikiProject Mathematics
259:"mathematization" joke
231:
211:
210:{\displaystyle \cdot }
528:Mathematical notation
522:Mathematical notation
514:mathematical notation
232:
212:
253:mathematization joke
221:
201:
121:mathematics articles
302:Point well taken,
227:
207:
90:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
484:"AMS style guide"
322:Mathematical Joke
294:
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
566:
495:
494:
488:
479:
446:
440:
293:
236:
234:
233:
228:
216:
214:
213:
208:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
25:
24:
16:
574:
573:
569:
568:
567:
565:
564:
563:
544:
543:
505:
500:
499:
498:
486:
481:
480:
476:
444:
438:
435:
433:AMS style guide
352:
337:130.231.106.133
324:
285:
255:
219:
218:
199:
198:
171:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
12:
11:
5:
572:
570:
562:
561:
556:
546:
545:
504:
501:
497:
496:
473:
472:
468:
434:
431:
430:
429:
418:120.17.126.118
414:
405:
404:
393:120.17.126.118
389:
382:
379:
371:
351:
348:
323:
320:
319:
318:
284:
281:
254:
251:
250:
249:
226:
206:
170:
167:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
571:
560:
557:
555:
552:
551:
549:
542:
541:
537:
533:
529:
524:
523:
519:
515:
510:
502:
492:
485:
478:
475:
471:
467:
466:
462:
458:
452:
450:
443:
432:
427:
423:
419:
415:
412:
407:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
387:
383:
380:
376:
372:
369:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
349:
347:
346:
342:
338:
333:
332:
329:
321:
317:
313:
309:
308:PaulTanenbaum
305:
301:
300:
299:
298:
295:
291:
282:
280:
279:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
252:
248:
244:
240:
239:Niels Ø (noe)
224:
204:
195:
194:
193:
191:
186:
182:
180:
176:
168:
166:
164:
160:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
525:
506:
477:
469:
453:
436:
410:
385:
353:
334:
328:The Roc 1217
325:
286:
256:
217:and you say
187:
183:
172:
157:As found in
156:
137:Low-priority
136:
96:
62:Low‑priority
40:WikiProjects
29:
190:Quuxplusone
112:Mathematics
103:mathematics
59:Mathematics
548:Categories
470:References
378:described.
409:America,
350:Globalize
532:D.Lazard
457:D.Lazard
30:redirect
304:Lambiam
290:Lambiam
139:on the
509:WP:TNT
416:—DIV (
391:—DIV (
36:scale.
518:WP:OR
487:(PDF)
175:Knuth
163:mikka
28:This
536:talk
461:talk
442:npov
422:talk
397:talk
375:NIST
361:talk
357:Neil
341:talk
312:talk
275:Talk
269:. —
267:imho
243:talk
411:etc
386:not
271:MFH
179:PDF
131:Low
550::
538:)
489:.
463:)
445:}}
439:{{
424:)
399:)
363:)
355:--
343:)
314:)
306:!—
245:)
225:×
205:⋅
534:(
493:.
459:(
428:)
420:(
413:.
403:)
395:(
359:(
339:(
310:(
273::
241:(
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
