687:
SEVERAL times , and IF it comes to me posting the entire ships log from 1975 to 1976 , I have all the time in the world . As for the personal attack thing , there are 15 people who question your ability to edit anything as per your page and I don't see anything on YOUR page which gives you the qualifications. Personally , everything in the 1970-79 section is hearsay because NONE of it cites a source article . Most of it comes from the
Department of the Navy site and the exact same information is posted on the USS Worden crew page , technically , it is hearsay as well . Missing are several ports of call in 1975 , missing is the near accident with the Soviet Guided Missile Cruiser of the Sea of Ohotsk after the Worden left Sasebo , and missing are several deaths , one when a missile fired in the Gulf of Tonkin at a Vietcong Mig failed and killed two people on the bridge . Knowledge (XXG) relies on people like myself who were there to fill in the gaps . Unfortunately , people like yourself want only the GOOD things and want to leave the bad things out. We are not judges , neither YOU nor I , and you cannot change history . Had you not been so self righteous , I would have provided you with my microfiche copy and commentary by the Naval Courts of Appeals on several of the cases which were thrown out. I have spent 31 years researching this. I am sending them to Knowledge (XXG) , however and consulting with the same editor I have been discussing this matter with , perhaps it is time to have you blocked as 57% of the people commenting on your page feels that your editing was meddlesome and unwarranted. Block away , there are over 200 of those crewmembers still alive who will post the same thing .
71:
53:
579:
in the Navy and it is history . JUST because YOU don't think so is YOUR opinion. I cited the Naval Ships logs held at the
National Archives , and I am NOT going to get into a pissing contest with a smart ass who thinks he has the power to change history by the wtroke of a keyboard. The original page went to Senator Levin anyway and I guess he will ask you why you keep changing history . What makes YOU the arbiter of history ? I have seen other pages on Knowledge (XXG) with JUST as controversial content but no one has made themselves self righteous enough to change it . Either ask the crewmembers YOURSELF or let it go , because it is history and it is in the National Archives , 1976 ships log section .
339:
672:, I hope it will not come to that. If you provide reliable sources and explain how this belongs in an encyclopedia article, there will not be an issue. Right now this is just a story you are telling, that you obviously have a personal opinion and conflict of interest in and saying trust me its true, I was there. Unfortunately, none of our stories or personal experiences can be trusted thats why we have guidelines and policies requiring sources and citations. Anything else is
458:
annals of Naval Legal
History. If you want verification , I suggest you go to the USS Worden Crewmember list and query the crewmen who were aboard the Worden during that time period , but don't assume you know something didn't happen when it did. The fact that there were deaths surrounding this incident warrants mentioning JUST as the Oriskany and Forrestal Fires did. My name happens TO be on the crewmember list and I don't need verification when I was there.
606:
know WHO is doing the editing and why . Again , you're giving me your personal opinion and not fact and again this is an immature pissing contest , It will continue to be edited regardless of what you say and YOU can Never block all 16 of my ID's. Have a nice day. As far as the comments on your talk page , it seems that you have been lambasted quite a bit for improper edits . Perhaps minding YOUR business would be an appropritate term here Jr ?
355:
117:
323:
22:
208:
280:
269:
247:
166:
134:
676:. Knowledge (XXG) is not a publisher of original research. I'll ignore your continued personal attacks. As for if you were or were not a crew member, it really doesn't matter, cite a newspaper article, 60 minutes something reliable. Knowledge (XXG) can not use anecdotes. Sign your posts too, just type 4 of those tilde things (~) in a row. --
258:
236:
721:
Worden Drug
Arrests , Stars And Stripes Yokosuka Edition , July 11 , 1976 .... Look it up . Intimidation ?/ who says ?? Because I checked with someone else on procedure it's intimidation ? Thanks to archiving , I can send all of these to Knowledge (XXG) and let them decide for themselves . Its not a
578:
I did JUST that and you still erased it. This is no personal withc hunt as a man comitted suicide because he was falsely accused of using drugs it is a fact as it is a historical fact that over 200 men of a ships crew of 380 were
Punished based on two statements , NOTHING like this has ever happened
877:
Please change the label "Frigate" to Guided
Missile "Destroyer/Cruiser" as appropriate to the timeframe. A frigate can not sustain independent "offensive" operations in a combat environment, whereas a cruiser can, hince the classification, "Cruiser". A Frigate can perform in a similar mission, but
686:
I just cited the ships logs which are held on microfiche in the
National Archives and gave you references. Again , your point is trivial as it either happened or it didn't . IF you choose to reute the ships log , then fine , but prove it isn't there as I can prove it is there . The source was cited
605:
I retired from the
Military , NO need for a soapbox. Fact is still no such action has EVER been taken in the history of the Navy . I have and I edit under SEVERAL other names , I just used this one because it is the name under which I am listed in the Crew Member list just in case someone wants to
457:
Your editing of the Worden Drug incident was unwarranted. It is a part of history and there was even a tragedy related to this incident. If you were NOT on the USS Worden in 1975/76 you not only have no knowledge of this incident , you have NO right to edit what is is the ships log and is in the
541:
The page on relable source says information from LIVING PERSONS. SINCE I WAS ABOARD THE WORDEN FROM 1974 TO 1976 AND THIS IS MY ORAL HISTORY , IT MAKES YOUR EDITING UNWARRANTED AND IT FALLAS IN THE GUIDELINES. PLEASE GO THE THE CREWMEMBER LIST , YOU WILL SEE MY NAME . THANK
629:
By the way according to
Knowledge (XXG) , and I have conferred with an editor on this is that the header of the page should say " This page contains information from unverified sources " NOT erasing as you do. Knowledge (XXG) says YOU are the one committing vandalism
790:
and search for "DLG", you will find a series of articles in which DLG is either defined as "guided missile destroyer" or guided missile destroyer leader". There are only two pages that define DLG as "guided missile frigate" and one is a copy of the other.
885:
Just for the semantics, D/DD = destroyer, F = frigate, FF = fast frigate, D = Destroyer, C = Cruiser, G = guided missile, N = nuclear, L = leader, CV = carrier (V denotes airwing), then we get into the L types (Amphibs), P types (Patrol), and others.
346:
148:
881:
Being a "Tin-Can" sailor that has served on
Cruisers, Destroyers, and Frigates, and in particular a crewmember aboard the USS Worden(CG-18) from Jan 77-Dec 79, this girl was so much more than a Frigate! "Id Fiat Worden Si"! "The Best In The West"!
362:
152:
582:
I decided to go one step further , I have in my posession copies of the ships log from there and will send them to Knowledge (XXG) myself , I think YOU need to be reported for vandalism because YOU continue to change what is a proven fact .
565:
We are not reliable sources, cite a newspaper, book, reliable website etc. This is not the place for a personal witch hunt, or a place to drum up support for one. There is no need to place comments in random spots on my talk page.
70:
52:
504:
www.history.navy.mil , National Archives is the source . Would you like the exact section of the National Archives ? I have a source . Under WHAT authority do you refute it ? Ships logs are viewable at The Navysite
330:
144:
833:
shows all pages at navy.mil where both "frigate" and "DL" appear. It appears that when the DL designation was first used in 1951 it meant "destroyer leader", but DLs were reclassified "frigates" in 1955.
744:
Editors are subject to the same rules as everyone else. Several editors deleted content from my talk page. Please admonish them in the same manner . Rules are rules and EVERYONE must abide by them .
944:
954:
949:
959:
830:
784:
I really didn't think that anyone would contest the change I made, changing the definition of the hull designation of DLG from "Frigate" to "Destroyer Leader", but here we are.
221:
178:
207:
412:
The page will be reposted every day UNTIL 60 minutes does it's investigation of the incident. You can continue to erase it all you wish , it will be reposted daily.
934:
929:
939:
846:
87:
722:
soapbox , it is a historical fact. Your opinon , basically after reading your page and the eidts and error you have contributed to is worth half of jack.
725:
690:
633:
609:
545:
508:
464:
437:
415:
173:
139:
710:
The rest of the article is basically a copy of DANFS, the Public domain dictionary of fighting ships. Thats the source for the rest, not hearsay. --
853:
article. I don't know if we need a centralized area for this discussion since this same item was posted on about a dozen talk pages. See also:
591:
to air our complaints about the navy, the government or whoever. This is not the place to make your case against the government. Please read
182:
924:
655:
You conferred with another editor? Tell them to speak up. I have done nothing wrong and your intimidation will not give you your soapbox. -
592:
919:
760:
737:
702:
645:
621:
557:
520:
476:
449:
427:
864:
Thanks, I'll leave this comment at USS Fox and put links at all the other talk pages to point people there for centralized discussion.
91:
896:
800:
I don't know who called them "frigates" but the Navy doesn't (and didn't) and the sailors that served on them don't (and didn't.)
33:
95:
78:
58:
797:
The only reference to them being Frigates in the Navy.mil website is on a handful of ship histories, but not all of them.
794:
In addition, no one I know that ever served aboard a DLG (while it was a DLG) would have called their ship a "frigate".
812:
39:
21:
900:
756:
733:
698:
641:
617:
553:
516:
472:
445:
423:
177:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
892:
748:
338:
403:. This is an encyclopedia, and every case of Captain's mast or courts martial on a ship is not needed. --
752:
729:
694:
637:
613:
549:
512:
468:
441:
419:
854:
820:
769:
No, they did not. Nobody but you has ever removed content from your talk page; I just looked at it.
878:
in a defensive character of operations. The Worden (CG-18) has never been classified as a Frigate.
808:
804:
816:
669:
588:
528:
459:
396:
400:
865:
835:
770:
673:
489:
392:
388:
711:
677:
656:
596:
567:
532:
493:
404:
850:
913:
86:-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
823:. If a DL is a Destroyer Leader, why isn't a DLG a Guided Missile Destroyer Leader?
116:
354:
904:
868:
838:
773:
714:
680:
659:
599:
570:
535:
496:
407:
322:
94:. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
434:
When over 200 people were incarcerated or punished then it is History.
595:
and familiarize yourself with the way this encyclopedia operates. --
527:
If you post this everyday, you will just be blocked for vandalism.
165:
133:
83:
488:
Sea stories are entertaining, but without sources it is called
587:
We're writing an encyclopedia here, not a creating a personal
15:
353:
337:
321:
206:
460:
http://www.navysite.de/crew.php?action=ship&ship=CG_18
668:
Blocking 16 accounts would be a trivial matter and its
788:
945:
Start-Class North American military history articles
219:
This article has been checked against the following
955:
Start-Class United States military history articles
950:
North American military history task force articles
304:
218:
960:United States military history task force articles
803:I also would like to call your attention to the
8:
191:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
847:Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships
19:
347:North American military history task force
301:
215:
128:
47:
849:repeatedly uses the word frigate in it's
363:United States military history task force
171:This article is within the scope of the
593:Knowledge (XXG):Policies and guidelines
130:
49:
857:and others. --02:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
181:. To use this banner, please see the
935:Start-Class maritime warfare articles
930:Start-Class military history articles
889:~OSC(SW) Samuel Glenn USN, Retired.
787:If you go to the U.S. Navy's website
194:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
940:Maritime warfare task force articles
76:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
479:) 22:14, February 18, 2007 (UTC)
104:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ships
529:Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox
278:
267:
256:
245:
234:
164:
132:
115:
69:
51:
20:
826:-TCav 01:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
1:
774:16:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
715:23:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
681:23:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
660:23:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
600:22:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
571:22:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
536:22:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
497:22:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
408:22:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
174:Military history WikiProject
925:All WikiProject Ships pages
905:23:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
481:(removed from my talk page)
331:Maritime warfare task force
82:, a project to improve all
976:
920:Start-Class Ships articles
562:(moved from my talk page)
531:for a personal crusade. --
239:Referencing and citation:
107:Template:WikiProject Ships
813:USS John S. McCain (DL-3)
361:
345:
329:
300:
197:military history articles
159:
64:
46:
869:15:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
839:01:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
305:Associated task forces:
250:Coverage and accuracy:
90:, or contribute to the
670:done all the time here
358:
342:
326:
283:Supporting materials:
211:
28:This article is rated
728:comment was added by
693:comment was added by
636:comment was added by
612:comment was added by
548:comment was added by
511:comment was added by
467:comment was added by
440:comment was added by
418:comment was added by
357:
341:
325:
210:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
855:Talk:USS Fox (CG-33)
821:USS Wilkinson (DL-5)
809:USS Mitscher (DL-2)
272:Grammar and style:
225:for B-class status:
831:This Google search
805:USS Norfolk (DL-1)
383:Witch hunt section
359:
343:
327:
212:
179:list of open tasks
92:project discussion
34:content assessment
895:comment added by
817:USS Willis A. Lee
765:
751:comment added by
741:
706:
674:original research
649:
625:
561:
524:
490:Original research
480:
453:
431:
380:
379:
376:
375:
372:
371:
368:
367:
296:
295:
263:criterion not met
241:criterion not met
183:full instructions
127:
126:
123:
122:
96:full instructions
79:WikiProject Ships
967:
907:
819:(DL-4), and the
764:
745:
723:
688:
631:
607:
543:
506:
462:
435:
413:
387:You should read
312:
302:
286:
282:
281:
275:
271:
270:
264:
260:
259:
253:
249:
248:
242:
238:
237:
216:
199:
198:
195:
192:
189:
188:Military history
168:
161:
160:
155:
140:Military history
136:
129:
119:
112:
111:
108:
105:
102:
88:join the project
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
975:
974:
970:
969:
968:
966:
965:
964:
910:
909:
890:
782:
746:
724:—The preceding
689:—The preceding
632:—The preceding
608:—The preceding
544:—The preceding
507:—The preceding
463:—The preceding
436:—The preceding
414:—The preceding
385:
310:
284:
279:
273:
268:
262:
257:
251:
246:
240:
235:
196:
193:
190:
187:
186:
142:
109:
106:
103:
100:
99:
29:
12:
11:
5:
973:
971:
963:
962:
957:
952:
947:
942:
937:
932:
927:
922:
912:
911:
876:
874:
873:
872:
871:
859:
858:
842:
841:
781:
778:
777:
776:
720:
718:
717:
684:
683:
665:
664:
663:
662:
628:
603:
602:
576:
575:
574:
573:
502:
501:
500:
499:
483:
482:
384:
381:
378:
377:
374:
373:
370:
369:
366:
365:
360:
350:
349:
344:
334:
333:
328:
318:
317:
315:
313:
307:
306:
298:
297:
294:
293:
291:
289:
288:
287:
276:
265:
254:
243:
229:
228:
226:
213:
203:
202:
200:
169:
157:
156:
137:
125:
124:
121:
120:
113:
110:Ships articles
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
972:
961:
958:
956:
953:
951:
948:
946:
943:
941:
938:
936:
933:
931:
928:
926:
923:
921:
918:
917:
915:
908:
906:
902:
898:
894:
887:
883:
879:
870:
867:
863:
862:
861:
860:
856:
852:
848:
844:
843:
840:
837:
832:
829:
828:
827:
824:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
801:
798:
795:
792:
789:
785:
779:
775:
772:
768:
767:
766:
762:
758:
754:
753:Alvinthefirst
750:
742:
739:
735:
731:
730:Alvinthefirst
727:
716:
713:
709:
708:
707:
704:
700:
696:
695:Alvinthefirst
692:
682:
679:
675:
671:
667:
666:
661:
658:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
647:
643:
639:
638:Alvinthefirst
635:
626:
623:
619:
615:
614:Alvinthefirst
611:
601:
598:
594:
590:
586:
585:
584:
580:
572:
569:
564:
563:
559:
555:
551:
550:Alvinthefirst
547:
540:
539:
538:
537:
534:
530:
525:
522:
518:
514:
513:Alvinthefirst
510:
498:
495:
491:
487:
486:
485:
484:
478:
474:
470:
469:Alvinthefirst
466:
461:
456:
455:
454:
451:
447:
443:
442:Alvinthefirst
439:
432:
429:
425:
421:
420:Alvinthefirst
417:
410:
409:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
382:
364:
356:
352:
351:
348:
340:
336:
335:
332:
324:
320:
319:
316:
314:
309:
308:
303:
299:
292:
290:
285:criterion met
277:
274:criterion met
266:
255:
252:criterion met
244:
233:
232:
231:
230:
227:
224:
223:
217:
214:
209:
205:
204:
201:
184:
180:
176:
175:
170:
167:
163:
162:
158:
154:
153:United States
150:
149:North America
146:
141:
138:
135:
131:
118:
114:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
897:74.234.164.6
888:
884:
880:
875:
845:The US Navy
825:
802:
799:
796:
793:
786:
783:
743:
719:
685:
627:
604:
581:
577:
526:
503:
433:
411:
386:
220:
172:
77:
40:WikiProjects
891:—Preceding
747:—Preceding
261:Structure:
30:Start-class
914:Categories
866:TomTheHand
836:TomTheHand
771:TomTheHand
851:Worden IV
712:Dual Freq
678:Dual Freq
657:Dual Freq
597:Dual Freq
568:Dual Freq
533:Dual Freq
494:Dual Freq
405:Dual Freq
893:unsigned
780:Frigate?
761:contribs
749:unsigned
738:contribs
726:unsigned
703:contribs
691:unsigned
646:contribs
634:unsigned
622:contribs
610:unsigned
558:contribs
546:unsigned
521:contribs
509:unsigned
477:contribs
465:unsigned
450:contribs
438:unsigned
428:contribs
416:unsigned
222:criteria
145:Maritime
589:soapbox
397:WP:Cite
815:, the
811:, the
807:, the
401:WP:NOT
36:scale.
393:WP:RS
389:WP:OR
101:Ships
59:Ships
901:talk
757:talk
734:talk
699:talk
642:talk
618:talk
554:talk
542:YOU.
517:talk
492:. --
473:talk
446:talk
424:talk
399:and
84:Ship
916::
903:)
763:)
759:•
740:).
736:•
705:).
701:•
648:).
644:•
624:).
620:•
566:--
560:).
556:•
523:).
519:•
475:•
452:).
448:•
430:).
426:•
395:,
391:,
311:/
151:/
147:/
143::
899:(
755:(
732:(
697:(
640:(
630:.
616:(
552:(
515:(
505:.
471:(
444:(
422:(
185:.
98:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
