171:
151:
316:
film analysis page. Perhaps a wikifilm is in order, but this isn't it. Further, as other users have pointed out, other film pages do not have extensive analyses of this sort. Normalization is in order. I agree with Doctor
Sunshine that analysis is an interesting feature to keep on wikipedia, but it should be a brief (one-two paragraph) summary of major critical views on the film, not an exposition of one critic's view. - Unsigned, 30 January 2007
420:
22:
81:
53:
91:
315:
The problem with the analysis is that it is a one-sided perspective of Dr. Millicent Marcus, who, however good an
Italianist, is not intimately connected with the film. This page is about the film, not Marcus. A link to Marcus' work would suffice. Knowledge (XXG) is, after all, an encyclopedia, not a
499:
Some time ago I wasted my time correcting what one or more imbecils did in some sort of essey about a movie they obviously did not see. Now in the middle of that some other moron comes in and adds "this section does not cite..." bla bla. Well.. before my edits there was no citation either, yet this
203:
Some parts here are terribly written: "There is a dialectic of generational compositions which in the opening film of neorealism - commonly accepted as Rome, Open City - there is a parade of boys marching on Rome to reclaim the future -perhaps itself a reference to
Mussolini's march on Rome" What
249:
This article doesn't really read like a film page...nothing about the film, critical response, commercial success/failure, awards, influence or even the plot. There's just a so-called synopsis, which isn't really anything of the sort. It's quite good really, at least if it isn't copyvio, but
469:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
375:
By the way, at least the first three paragraphs of the analysis section are plagiarized, as can be found through a quick google search of its contents. I cannot confirm the rest of it is, but the analysis section will basically need to be dropped.
284:
I don't think this is a copyvio - it looks to me like someone's film class essay pasted in here. It appeared all at once from an anonymous IP. I think we should just start over. Save a few useful bits, but basically start over. -
500:
moron had no feeling to add that. So? Does he need something to justify it? Obviously not. The quick answer is you get what you paid for - next time get a book on a certain topic as
Knowledge (XXG) is surely not a match.
655:
466:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with
Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
335:. A perfectly good source, but I agree with Anon above that it's wrong to rehash a critic's entire argument ad nauseum. Anyone have a good idea about exactly how to summarise the analysis?
160:
63:
578:
574:
560:
204:
does that even mean? Are they saying many neo-realist films open with boys marching on Rome? People need to stop posting parts of their badly written school essays.
546:
645:
298:
Having an analysis is a good thing. More film articles could use them. Rather than deleting information why not just add a proper synopsis or plot outline.
650:
447:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
444:
471:
463:
459:
436:
356:
I've added a simple plot synopsis after seeing the film, it's likely not great but this article needed one, and I wanted to make sure it got one. -
665:
660:
475:
205:
241:
670:
640:
507:
275:
180:
109:
67:
556:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
33:
547:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110721100149/http://www.ingmarbergman.se/universe.asp?guid=66DA7015-8017-4303-9A31-658D02296D45
121:
113:
117:
104:
58:
621:
550:
332:
577:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
485:
209:
39:
21:
455:
427:
612:
538:
271:
237:
503:
263:
229:
534:
511:
596:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
584:
381:
233:
537:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
432:
267:
299:
431:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
481:
581:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
170:
597:
251:
391:
377:
357:
604:
398:
448:
150:
563:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
603:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
570:
419:
634:
336:
551:
http://www.ingmarbergman.se/universe.asp?guid=66DA7015-8017-4303-9A31-658D02296D45
108:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
96:
569:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
530:
394:
286:
219:
86:
80:
52:
218:
This reads like a review in an arts magazine. Possible copyright violation?
125:
331:
The article simply cites 'Marcus 1986', but I presume it's referring to
259:
Umberto D is a masterpiece. What the F*** is this article even about?
626:
515:
489:
402:
385:
360:
339:
302:
289:
254:
213:
443:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
15:
656:
Core film articles supported by the
Italian cinema task force
418:
169:
149:
541:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
573:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
474:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
225:Synopsis means summary. There is no summary here.
415:Fair use rationale for Image:Umberto-d-full.jpg
124:. To improve this article, please refer to the
559:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
464:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
250:shouldn't be the entirety of the article --
19:
529:I have just modified one external link on
120:. To use this banner, please refer to the
47:
49:
393:, I removed the offending section. -
7:
102:This article is within the scope of
646:Start-Class Italian cinema articles
38:It is of interest to the following
651:Italian cinema task force articles
495:Knowledge (XXG) breeding imbecils?
14:
533:. Please take a moment to review
178:This article is on the project's
158:This article is supported by the
462:. Using one of the templates at
134:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film
118:regional and topical task forces
89:
79:
51:
20:
666:WikiProject Film core articles
661:Start-Class core film articles
476:Media copyright questions page
1:
490:02:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
445:boilerplate fair use template
390:Looks like it was taken from
627:14:55, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
472:criteria for speedy deletion
403:16:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
386:15:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
340:02:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
303:18:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
290:21:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
214:15:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
516:00:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
687:
590:(last update: 5 June 2024)
526:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
456:the image description page
361:04:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
671:WikiProject Film articles
641:Start-Class film articles
458:and edit it to include a
177:
161:Italian cinema task force
157:
137:Template:WikiProject Film
74:
46:
437:explanation or rationale
428:Image:Umberto-d-full.jpg
255:09:59, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
222:00:09, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
522:External links modified
423:
199:Synopsis means summary
174:
154:
28:This article is rated
439:as to why its use in
422:
173:
153:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
571:regular verification
561:After February 2018
110:join the discussion
615:InternetArchiveBot
566:InternetArchiveBot
460:fair use rationale
424:
175:
155:
34:content assessment
591:
506:comment added by
280:
266:comment added by
246:
232:comment added by
196:
195:
192:
191:
188:
187:
112:and see lists of
678:
625:
616:
589:
588:
567:
518:
435:but there is no
279:
260:
245:
226:
142:
141:
138:
135:
132:
105:WikiProject Film
99:
94:
93:
92:
83:
76:
75:
70:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
686:
685:
681:
680:
679:
677:
676:
675:
631:
630:
619:
614:
582:
575:have permission
565:
539:this simple FaQ
524:
501:
497:
417:
300:Doctor Sunshine
261:
227:
206:207.112.125.130
201:
139:
136:
133:
130:
129:
95:
90:
88:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
684:
682:
674:
673:
668:
663:
658:
653:
648:
643:
633:
632:
609:
608:
601:
554:
553:
545:Added archive
523:
520:
496:
493:
482:BetacommandBot
416:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
308:
307:
306:
305:
293:
292:
200:
197:
194:
193:
190:
189:
186:
185:
176:
166:
165:
156:
146:
145:
143:
101:
100:
84:
72:
71:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
683:
672:
669:
667:
664:
662:
659:
657:
654:
652:
649:
647:
644:
642:
639:
638:
636:
629:
628:
623:
618:
617:
606:
602:
599:
595:
594:
593:
586:
580:
576:
572:
568:
562:
557:
552:
548:
544:
543:
542:
540:
536:
532:
527:
521:
519:
517:
513:
509:
505:
494:
492:
491:
487:
483:
479:
478:. Thank you.
477:
473:
467:
465:
461:
457:
454:Please go to
452:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
421:
414:
404:
400:
396:
392:
389:
388:
387:
383:
379:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
362:
359:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
341:
338:
334:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
304:
301:
297:
296:
295:
294:
291:
288:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
257:
256:
253:
247:
243:
239:
235:
234:66.240.10.170
231:
223:
221:
216:
215:
211:
207:
198:
183:
182:
172:
168:
167:
163:
162:
152:
148:
147:
144:
140:film articles
127:
123:
122:documentation
119:
115:
111:
107:
106:
98:
87:
85:
82:
78:
77:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
613:
610:
585:source check
564:
558:
555:
528:
525:
508:89.32.194.22
498:
480:
468:
453:
440:
426:
425:
268:72.66.13.244
258:
252:Gargletheape
248:
224:
217:
202:
179:
159:
103:
40:WikiProjects
502:—Preceding
378:KingPenguin
358:KingPenguin
262:—Preceding
228:—Preceding
97:Film portal
30:Start-class
635:Categories
622:Report bug
531:Umberto D.
126:guidelines
114:open tasks
605:this tool
598:this tool
333:this book
181:core list
611:Cheers.—
504:unsigned
449:fair use
433:fair use
276:contribs
264:unsigned
242:contribs
230:unsigned
535:my edit
337:Cop 633
64:Italian
36:scale.
395:AKeen
287:AKeen
512:talk
486:talk
441:this
399:talk
382:talk
272:talk
238:talk
220:~~~~
210:talk
131:Film
116:and
68:Core
59:Film
579:RfC
549:to
637::
592:.
587:}}
583:{{
514:)
488:)
451:.
401:)
384:)
278:)
274:•
244:)
240:•
212:)
66:/
62::
624:)
620:(
607:.
600:.
510:(
484:(
397:(
380:(
376:-
270:(
236:(
208:(
184:.
164:.
128:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
