298:
277:
1510:" which is true - all growing parties do that. But to claim that I even hinted that "UKIP belongs in the same category as the National Front and BNP" is a gross misrepresentation. As for Ofcom (and, in fact, not just Ofcom but the BBC as well since Ofcom does not oversee the latter) the only connection is that it said that in terms of votes UKIP is a major party. It did not say mainstream. Of course, one solution is to rewrite the lead to say that "all the mainstream parties except UKIP oppose fascism", which I suspect is not what we want.
1419:
mainstream. Similarily unconvincing is
Emeraude repeating their POV that Westminster representation is relevant but European representation is irrelevant, their POV that UKIP belongs in the same category as the National Front and BNP, and their laughable POV (not shared by OFCOM) that UKIP has 'token support'. Emeraude claims "it's to do with size", which even if accepted is a bizarre justification given that UKIP topped the Euro Elections. Pretending that UKIP is not mainstream is POV pushing.--
1320:
BNP, etc etc etc). Until a party has more than token support in elections (NOT opinion polls) and in
Parliament (two seats picked up in unusual circumstances in by elections) it is simply nonsense to describe it as mainstream. It is nothing to do with policies, philosophies or programmes; it's to do with size. Another editor has commented that things may change after the election and indeed they may, but until such time UKIP is not mainstream.
581:
387:
366:
397:
215:
492:
471:
502:
246:
901:"Mainstream" can have two meanings. In Knowledge it normally means accepted in reliable sources, e.g., that climate change is occuring is the mainstream view. It can also mean popular as in climate change denial has gone mainstream. The views defended by UKIP are not mainstream in the first meaning.
1887:
If we class an important criticism as one which is picked up by secondary sources, then the only valid one to include is from
Tatchell, which was reported by Gilligan. Davids Tate and Toube are cited from their own op-eds, which is the same as why apparently we can not quote Bloodsworth. Does what I
1782:
Neutrality does not require that we balance a hostile right-winger's comments with a hostile left-winger's comments. You are claiming that criticism is significant because the critic is. But that does not follow, even assuming he was significant. Do any secondary sources establish his criticism
1545:
And you are not engaging with the way
Knowledge works, You don't get to determine what is or is not basic logic. If you changes are opposed and you can't gain consensus for a change (which you haven't) then you raise an RfC you don't edit war. I suggest you self revert or its a 3rr report and
1482:
There is clear evidence of sock puppetry in the IPs so don't assume all criticism is directed at you. Wait for the election to be over, changing things during an election period is always problematic. At the moment you don't have support from most other editors involved. Your reference relates to
1116:
Absolutely right. Besides, UKIP did not "win" the Euro elections - they got more votes than any other UK party, which is not the same thing and they are part of a very minor grouping within the
European Parliament. I do not think that UKIP's own rhetoric would class them as "mainstream" being based,
974:
TFD is raising a different point by talking about a different definition of "mainstream", however after giving this new definition of "mainstream" he has not given examples of how UKIP fails this definition. Snowded your only justification for UKIP not being a mainstream party was that it only had 2
1450:
You don't determine "mainstream' in one
European election with one of the lowest turnouts in history - protest votes have happened in the past as well. Per other comments here, that position may change after the General Election, If that is the case then we can look at again. In the mean time
1319:
Quote: "'All mainstream' is clearly contentious...". Well, no it's not actually. UKIP constantly differentiates itself from the mainstream parties and has made a great play of this - "they're all as bad as each other" etc. Not surprising; all new parties wanting to grow do this (see
National Front,
1070:
The phrase 'all mainstream' is clear POV and unsupported by a credible source. Who defines 'mainstream' and how can it possibly exclude UKIP who won the Euro elections,participated in the election debates and are polling third across the UK? I consider DUP and Sinn Fein also mainstream as they have
1418:
Snowded writes "Common use on mainstream is clear. also we have one named editor and two IPs (both with the same geographical position), so how many editors are we delating with here?" That attempt to substantiate their POV is clearly wrong. I am not the only named editor who contends that UKIP is
915:
I don't think you have quite followed through your point there. Your first definition of mainstream doesn't have much meaning in the arena of politics, when there is vociferous criticism of all political parties by reliable sources. Political views are clearly qualitatively different to scientific
1851:
We can report relevant facts and we can use third party reliable sources as a summary, What we can't do is create our own summaries that make judgements. That there have been criticisms is relevant, if there is a third party summary then lets use it, Otherwise some of the specifically sourced
1805:
That brings up the question of whether to have a criticism section at all. Naturally, they can end up with overrepresenting minor viewpoints and statements above the entire subject. I think I'm coming to the conclusion that criticism sections are only important for groups if they relate to actual
1467:
How dare you accuse me of edit warring or of sock puppetry. If those comments were for others then address those others, don't make the accusations in a response to my comments. Topping the Euro elections is not a 'protest vote', you don't get to decide what 'mainstream' means. OFCOM have decided
1730:
I also had a quote from this article removed. It is by a prominent left-wing author and written in a broadsheet newspaper, and was so chosen to illustrate the criticism of the group from other areas of the broadly-speaking "left". This balances the level of criticism from Andrew
Gilligan, who is
668:
it would seem inaccurate to describe UAF as being supported by "all mainstream" parties. Further the second paragraph just appears as a list and does not seem to really help the reader, as all that information is the info box anyway. Further, rather than just stating that Azad Ali is a member it
1763:
It's better to have nothing on Ali in the lead, especially with the amount of detail put into it in a very short lead, and as that controversy has nothing to do with his actions in UAF. Being humans, all other members must have done "bad" things as well, in addition to mostly "good" things.
786:
Two parliamentary seats, from by elections, does not make it "mainstream" (Sinn Fein has 5! The
Communist Party has had 4!). But even if it was mainstream the proposed edit - "several mainstream parties" - is so highly loaded as to be unacceptable when "all mainstream parties
1705:. It implies that the consensus is that the criticism is the mainstream view, when for all we know it could be just a rogue opinion. "The U.S. government has been criticized for allegedly being part of the New World Order conspiracy." Absolutely true, but misleading.
1190:'All mainstream' is clearly contentious so needs to be supported by a reliable source, not just by editors giving their own definition of what they think constitutes 'mainstream'. Defining terms yourself is almost the definition of POV, in my opinion ;) --
1364:
Once again absolutely no third party support provided for this argument. The only justification for using mainstream in this way is if it is commonly used by third party sources. You are yet to provide any of these and are merely POV pushing.
934:. In dealing with politics we would look to academic journals or books for evidence in exactly the same way as we would with science topics. Regardless of your view, until such time as reliable sources describe UKIP as mainstream, we don't.
811:
UKIP is also the winner of the most recent
European election and is consistently third in UK parliamentary polls. Their number of MPs is only one measure. Plenty of sources are now referring to UKIP as a "mainstream party", indeed this
1269:
We've had a false comparison to climate change denial and that's it, in terms of defining what mainstream is. Unless you explicitly state the criteria for being a "mainstream" political party you're just pushing a POV.
153:
857:
I don't understand your argument here. The current introduction appears deliberately misleading. What is the harm in saying politicians from Labour Lib Dems and Cons support UAF rather than all mainstream parties.
1806:
real-life scandal rather than op-eds (I'm thinking corruption, etc.) which is not the case here. The conclusion may be to remove the criticism section altogether until such criteria can be met with criticism.
1529:
You are not engaging with basic logic. Your contentious language has no third party support. When language is contentious it makes sense to remove it unless a third party source can be used to support it.
2176:
348:
338:
815:
gives an explanation for how UKIP became a "mainstream" party. Clearly there is no entirely objective way of defining a "mainstream" party, but there seems enough doubt to warrant a change in wording.
975:
MPs. I pointed out that this was a flawed measure as it did not represent their actual popularity and effect on political discourse, and that the media was referring to them as mainstream.
314:
697:
UKIP is being given some status in television debates but its number of seats (now reduced by one) is a very very small number. If that changes after the general election come back ----
2171:
1085:
Participation in election debates and polling figures in one general election are not really enough. Suggest you wait until after the Election then we can look at it again ----
305:
282:
147:
1228:
Common use on mainstream is clear. also we have one named editor and two IPs (both with the same geographical position), so how many editors are we delating with here? ----
1722:
The lead was weighing too heavy in detail in one area of criticism, that of Azad Ali. I changed it to a brief summary of the entire criticism section, which was reverted.
206:
2031:
2027:
2013:
1506:
I don't know about sock puppetry (beyond my expertise to say) but there's clear evidence of misrepresentation, both of what I said and what Ofcom says. I wrote "
1468:
UKIP are a national major party . You have said, and I quote "If UKIP become a major political party then we can look at it again", so let's look at it again. --
44:
1451:
edit warring, before there is consensus for change, is still wrong as is sock puppetry. If you are unhappy with the current consensus then call an RfA ----
1038:
Referring to support from "all" mainstream political parties is, at this point, a clearly controversial and unnecessary generalization. I removed the word.
2201:
1656:
558:
548:
79:
2186:
453:
443:
732:
685:
2206:
1623:] protracted discussion over contentious and innaccurate wording involving some of the same editors which ends the same way. Was it necessary?--
2191:
1727:
85:
1483:
electoral regulations which are linked to the number of seats contesting. That is not co-terminus as a definition with 'main stream' ----
297:
276:
1156:
614:
607:
602:
597:
524:
202:
198:
194:
190:
813:
2196:
1599:
Interesting. You accuse me of edit warring and/or sock puppetry and follow up by clarifying that from that comment I should not "assume
1372:
1277:
1039:
419:
2181:
1149:
Can you please be explicit in your criteria for defining a "mainstream" party and what third party source supports this definition.
1563:
You are clearly being deliberately obstinate. Maintaining the standard of Knowledge is more important than massaging editor's egos.
168:
1071:
ministers in devolved government. Of course if you are a UAF supporter I can then understand why you'd support this POV phrasing.--
989:
Several different points are being raised to try and explain to you why what you propose breeches Knowledge rules on sourcing. ----
135:
2145:
If we are to label them part of a moment then we need RS making the link. Also the UAF are a UK based organisation, not a US one.
1686:
The same editor has also added, without using sources, "group has been criticised for allegedly not being forthright in opposing
945:
Under TFD's first definition of mainstream is it the party itself or the policies of that party that do not make it mainstream?
515:
476:
99:
30:
410:
371:
310:
104:
20:
669:
would be better to have a sentence summarising the criticism section, and move the one about Ali to the criticism section.
1893:
1828:
1811:
1769:
1752:
1736:
1004:
No what has actually happened is you have continually brought up straw man arguments and have not engaged with my points.
74:
887:
It clearly isn't an accurate summary when UKIP is being referred to as a mainstream party in sources like the one above.
2074:
1683:. Weight can only be established by showing that the comments have received attention in mainstream secondary sources.
1571:
1535:
1009:
980:
950:
921:
892:
863:
820:
728:
681:
257:
129:
1731:
employed by a Conservative (albeit for cycling), and written in a newspaper which one can accurately call right-wing.
647:
65:
1747:
Yes, the edits to the lead were not sourced, because they summarised what was sourced elsewhere. That is acceptable
214:
185:
125:
1788:
1712:
1679:
I do not see anything in policy that because someone is left-wing that anything they publish in a broadsheet has
906:
756:
2030:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
626:
225:
2136:
1889:
1824:
1807:
1765:
1748:
1732:
1160:
1056:
It might be "clearly controversial" to you, but who else? You alone are not a consensus. I replaced the word.
1043:
175:
2065:
1971:
1567:
1531:
1376:
1281:
1005:
976:
946:
917:
888:
859:
816:
724:
677:
109:
2150:
2122:
2106:
2094:
2086:
1728:
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/why-is-the-left-so-blinkered-to-islamic-extremism-8679265.html
665:
1546:
an SPI if I can find the time to check on you and the other named editor against those IP addresses. ----
2049:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2037:
1963:
263:
24:
1970:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2004:
1784:
1708:
1368:
1273:
1152:
902:
752:
720:
673:
751:
It has 2 MPs. If it emerges as a major party after the next election, we can revisit the wording.
245:
2132:
1821:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Unite_Against_Fascism&diff=566069838&oldid=566069267
1628:
1612:
1473:
1424:
1195:
1076:
161:
141:
55:
872:
Its an accurate summary. If UKIP become a major political party then we can look at it again.----
523:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
418:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
313:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2131:
They held massive protests against right-wing groups, the same is still got violence and attacks.
1515:
1325:
1122:
1061:
939:
840:
796:
632:
230:
70:
2034:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2050:
2146:
2118:
1672:
767:
51:
1676:
with the edit summary, "significant criticism, a left-wing author in a broadsheet newspaper."
1702:
1680:
628:
580:
507:
227:
2057:
402:
2016:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1624:
1608:
1469:
1420:
1191:
1072:
2056:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
396:
386:
365:
2165:
2110:
1604:
1581:
1564:
1511:
1321:
1118:
1057:
935:
836:
792:
1983:
1927:
1853:
1687:
1585:
1547:
1484:
1452:
1229:
1086:
990:
960:
931:
873:
763:
698:
1603:
criticism is directed at" me, and yet here you remind Enlightened about policy on
930:
On the contrary, TFD's views are quite clear and refer to Knowledge's reliance on
630:
229:
2154:
2140:
2126:
2079:
2023:
1936:
1897:
1888:
wrote here make sense? Sometimes I don't write succinctly enough on talk pages.
1862:
1832:
1815:
1792:
1773:
1756:
1740:
1716:
1632:
1616:
1594:
1575:
1556:
1539:
1519:
1493:
1477:
1461:
1428:
1380:
1329:
1285:
1238:
1199:
1164:
1126:
1095:
1080:
1065:
1047:
1013:
999:
984:
969:
954:
925:
910:
896:
882:
867:
844:
824:
800:
771:
736:
707:
689:
2022:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1508:
all new parties wanting to grow do this (see National Front, BNP, etc etc etc)
497:
392:
716:
Surely a different form of wording would be appropriate to avoid ambiguity.
2102:
520:
2098:
1695:
1691:
415:
501:
491:
470:
1979:
959:
We've all explained policy on sourcing to you several times. ----
633:
574:
239:
231:
15:
1989:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1584:. Read up on the five pillars please and follow policy ----
1974:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
835:
Negative. If there is "doubt" there is no justifrication.
1967:
1820:
1699:
1677:
2177:
Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
160:
1117:
as it is, in criticism of of all the other parties.
519:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
414:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
323:
Knowledge:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
309:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2026:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
326:
Template:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
664:Now that UKIP is being considered a "major party"
1984:http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=22373
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
2172:C-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
2012:This message was posted before February 2018.
2105:groups organize protests and rallies such as
1852:material should stand as I understand it ----
1694:, as well as for the views of its Vice Chair
641:This page has archives. Sections older than
174:
8:
2117:Is it? do you have a source for this claim?
1670:An editor added criticism by the editor of
1580:First you edit, second you break policy on
1962:I have just modified one external link on
1366:
1271:
1150:
465:
360:
306:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
271:
1823:The section has dubious origins as well
1649:
467:
362:
329:Politics of the United Kingdom articles
273:
243:
2101:which dominate violently attacks when
651:when more than 4 sections are present.
2001:to let others know (documentation at
7:
1980:http://www.webcitation.org/6OF0eu4hv
513:This article is within the scope of
408:This article is within the scope of
303:This article is within the scope of
262:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
2202:Low-importance socialism articles
1966:. Please take a moment to review
645:may be automatically archived by
2187:Mid-importance politics articles
579:
500:
490:
469:
395:
385:
364:
296:
275:
244:
213:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
553:This article has been rated as
533:Knowledge:WikiProject Socialism
448:This article has been rated as
343:This article has been rated as
2207:WikiProject Socialism articles
2097:which isa massive and extreme
791:UKIP" would be more accurate.
536:Template:WikiProject Socialism
428:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
320:Politics of the United Kingdom
311:Politics of the United Kingdom
283:Politics of the United Kingdom
1:
2192:WikiProject Politics articles
527:and see a list of open tasks.
431:Template:WikiProject Politics
422:and see a list of open tasks.
317:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
2155:10:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
2141:10:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
2127:10:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
1783:as important to the topic?
1000:18:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
985:18:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
970:17:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
955:15:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
926:13:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
911:18:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
897:18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
883:16:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
868:15:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
845:14:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
825:12:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
801:10:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
772:02:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
737:01:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
708:19:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
690:13:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
2223:
2197:C-Class socialism articles
2043:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1959:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1937:07:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
1926:See previous comments ----
1621:Looks like this is another
1595:15:26, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
1576:10:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
1557:07:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
1540:19:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
1520:16:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
1494:08:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
1478:07:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
1462:04:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
1429:23:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
1381:13:53, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
1330:17:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
1286:14:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
1239:03:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
1200:22:11, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
1165:00:11, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
1127:17:19, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
1096:01:01, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
1081:21:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
1014:15:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
559:project's importance scale
454:project's importance scale
349:project's importance scale
2182:C-Class politics articles
2080:21:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
1898:20:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
1863:19:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
1833:18:23, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
1816:18:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
1793:18:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
1774:18:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
1757:17:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
1741:17:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
1717:17:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
1701:"Has been criticized" is
1066:14:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
1048:12:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
552:
485:
447:
380:
342:
291:
270:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1955:External links modified
1633:00:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
1617:18:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
2107:English Defence League
2095:Antifa (United States)
2087:Antifa (United States)
2085:Should UAF contain to
660:Change to Introduction
648:Lowercase sigmabot III
252:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1964:Unite Against Fascism
516:WikiProject Socialism
207:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
25:Unite Against Fascism
2024:regular verification
411:WikiProject Politics
105:No original research
2014:After February 2018
1993:parameter below to
2068:InternetArchiveBot
2019:InternetArchiveBot
1568:Enlightened editor
1532:Enlightened editor
1006:Enlightened editor
977:Enlightened editor
947:Enlightened editor
918:Enlightened editor
889:Enlightened editor
860:Enlightened editor
817:Enlightened editor
725:Enlightened editor
678:Enlightened editor
539:socialism articles
258:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
2044:
1935:
1861:
1673:Left Foot Forward
1593:
1555:
1492:
1460:
1383:
1371:comment added by
1288:
1276:comment added by
1237:
1167:
1155:comment added by
1094:
998:
968:
881:
740:
723:comment added by
706:
693:
676:comment added by
655:
654:
620:
619:
573:
572:
569:
568:
565:
564:
464:
463:
460:
459:
434:politics articles
359:
358:
355:
354:
238:
237:
66:Assume good faith
43:
2214:
2078:
2069:
2042:
2041:
2020:
2008:
1934:
1932:
1860:
1858:
1658:
1654:
1605:personal attacks
1592:
1590:
1582:personal attacks
1554:
1552:
1491:
1489:
1459:
1457:
1236:
1234:
1093:
1091:
997:
995:
967:
965:
932:reliable sources
880:
878:
739:
717:
705:
703:
692:
670:
650:
634:
594:
593:
583:
575:
541:
540:
537:
534:
531:
510:
508:Socialism portal
505:
504:
494:
487:
486:
481:
473:
466:
436:
435:
432:
429:
426:
405:
400:
399:
389:
382:
381:
376:
368:
361:
331:
330:
327:
324:
321:
300:
293:
292:
287:
279:
272:
255:
249:
248:
240:
232:
218:
217:
208:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
2222:
2221:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2162:
2161:
2093:UAF is same as
2091:
2072:
2067:
2035:
2028:have permission
2018:
2002:
1972:this simple FaQ
1957:
1928:
1854:
1668:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1655:
1651:
1586:
1548:
1485:
1453:
1230:
1087:
991:
961:
874:
718:
699:
671:
662:
646:
635:
629:
588:
538:
535:
532:
529:
528:
506:
499:
479:
433:
430:
427:
424:
423:
403:Politics portal
401:
394:
374:
328:
325:
322:
319:
318:
285:
256:on Knowledge's
253:
234:
233:
228:
205:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
2220:
2218:
2210:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2164:
2163:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2129:
2090:
2083:
2062:
2061:
2054:
1987:
1986:
1978:Added archive
1956:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1818:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1777:
1776:
1760:
1759:
1744:
1743:
1724:
1723:
1703:weasel-wording
1667:
1664:
1660:
1659:
1648:
1647:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1560:
1559:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1157:78.145.109.236
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1051:
1050:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1002:
972:
943:
850:
849:
848:
847:
830:
829:
828:
827:
806:
805:
804:
803:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
744:
743:
742:
741:
711:
710:
661:
658:
653:
652:
640:
637:
636:
631:
627:
625:
622:
621:
618:
617:
611:
610:
605:
600:
590:
589:
584:
578:
571:
570:
567:
566:
563:
562:
555:Low-importance
551:
545:
544:
542:
525:the discussion
512:
511:
495:
483:
482:
480:Low‑importance
474:
462:
461:
458:
457:
450:Mid-importance
446:
440:
439:
437:
420:the discussion
407:
406:
390:
378:
377:
375:Mid‑importance
369:
357:
356:
353:
352:
345:Low-importance
341:
335:
334:
332:
315:the discussion
301:
289:
288:
286:Low‑importance
280:
268:
267:
261:
250:
236:
235:
226:
224:
223:
220:
219:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2219:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2193:
2190:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2169:
2167:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2112:
2111:Britain First
2108:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2088:
2084:
2082:
2081:
2076:
2071:
2070:
2059:
2055:
2052:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2039:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2015:
2010:
2006:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1960:
1954:
1938:
1933:
1931:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1864:
1859:
1857:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1819:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1762:
1761:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1745:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1729:
1726:
1725:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1704:
1700:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1684:
1682:
1678:
1675:
1674:
1665:
1657:
1653:
1650:
1646:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1591:
1589:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1566:
1562:
1561:
1558:
1553:
1551:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1495:
1490:
1488:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1458:
1456:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1373:92.26.218.142
1370:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1278:92.26.218.142
1275:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1240:
1235:
1233:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1097:
1092:
1090:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1040:81.156.185.45
1037:
1036:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1001:
996:
994:
988:
987:
986:
982:
978:
973:
971:
966:
964:
958:
957:
956:
952:
948:
944:
941:
937:
933:
929:
928:
927:
923:
919:
914:
913:
912:
908:
904:
900:
899:
898:
894:
890:
886:
885:
884:
879:
877:
871:
870:
869:
865:
861:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
846:
842:
838:
834:
833:
832:
831:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
809:
808:
807:
802:
798:
794:
790:
785:
784:
783:
782:
773:
769:
765:
761:
760:
758:
754:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
715:
714:
713:
712:
709:
704:
702:
696:
695:
694:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
667:
659:
657:
649:
644:
639:
638:
624:
623:
616:
613:
612:
609:
606:
604:
601:
599:
596:
595:
592:
591:
587:
582:
577:
576:
560:
556:
550:
547:
546:
543:
526:
522:
518:
517:
509:
503:
498:
496:
493:
489:
488:
484:
478:
475:
472:
468:
455:
451:
445:
442:
441:
438:
421:
417:
413:
412:
404:
398:
393:
391:
388:
384:
383:
379:
373:
370:
367:
363:
350:
346:
340:
337:
336:
333:
316:
312:
308:
307:
302:
299:
295:
294:
290:
284:
281:
278:
274:
269:
265:
259:
251:
247:
242:
241:
222:
221:
216:
212:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
2147:Slatersteven
2133:Paul Lincoln
2119:Slatersteven
2092:
2066:
2063:
2038:source check
2017:
2011:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1988:
1961:
1958:
1929:
1855:
1707:
1688:antisemitism
1685:
1671:
1669:
1652:
1644:
1600:
1587:
1549:
1528:
1507:
1486:
1454:
1449:
1367:— Preceding
1272:— Preceding
1231:
1151:— Preceding
1088:
992:
962:
875:
788:
719:— Preceding
700:
672:— Preceding
663:
656:
642:
585:
554:
514:
449:
409:
344:
304:
264:WikiProjects
210:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
2005:Sourcecheck
148:free images
31:not a forum
2166:Categories
2075:Report bug
1645:References
2103:far-right
2058:this tool
2051:this tool
1890:'''tAD'''
1825:'''tAD'''
1808:'''tAD'''
1766:'''tAD'''
1749:'''tAD'''
1733:'''tAD'''
1666:Criticism
1625:Flexdream
1609:Flexdream
1470:Flexdream
1421:Flexdream
1192:Flexdream
1073:Flexdream
762:Bullshit.
615:Archive 4
608:Archive 3
603:Archive 2
598:Archive 1
530:Socialism
521:socialism
477:Socialism
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
2099:far-left
2064:Cheers.—
1696:Azad Ali
1692:Islamism
1512:Emeraude
1369:unsigned
1322:Emeraude
1274:unsigned
1153:unsigned
1119:Emeraude
1058:Emeraude
936:Emeraude
837:Emeraude
793:Emeraude
733:contribs
721:unsigned
686:contribs
674:unsigned
586:Archives
425:Politics
416:politics
372:Politics
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1991:checked
1968:my edit
1930:Snowded
1856:Snowded
1588:Snowded
1550:Snowded
1487:Snowded
1455:Snowded
1232:Snowded
1089:Snowded
993:Snowded
963:Snowded
916:facts.
876:Snowded
764:Cptnono
701:Snowded
643:30 days
557:on the
452:on the
347:on the
254:C-class
211:30Â days
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1999:failed
1681:weight
1565:WP:IAR
789:except
666:source
260:scale.
126:Google
812:video
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
2151:talk
2137:talk
2123:talk
2109:and
1995:true
1894:talk
1829:talk
1812:talk
1789:talk
1770:talk
1753:talk
1737:talk
1713:talk
1690:and
1629:talk
1613:talk
1572:talk
1536:talk
1516:talk
1474:talk
1425:talk
1377:talk
1326:talk
1282:talk
1196:talk
1161:talk
1123:talk
1077:talk
1062:talk
1044:talk
1010:talk
981:talk
951:talk
940:talk
922:talk
907:talk
893:talk
864:talk
841:talk
821:talk
797:talk
768:talk
757:talk
729:talk
682:talk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
2032:RfC
2009:).
1997:or
1982:to
1785:TFD
1709:TFD
1607:.--
1601:all
903:TFD
753:TFD
549:Low
444:Mid
339:Low
176:TWL
2168::
2153:)
2139:)
2125:)
2113:.
2045:.
2040:}}
2036:{{
2007:}}
2003:{{
1896:)
1831:)
1814:)
1791:)
1772:)
1755:)
1739:)
1715:)
1698:."
1631:)
1615:)
1574:)
1538:)
1518:)
1476:)
1427:)
1379:)
1328:)
1284:)
1198:)
1163:)
1125:)
1079:)
1064:)
1046:)
1012:)
983:)
953:)
924:)
909:)
895:)
866:)
843:)
823:)
799:)
770:)
759:)
735:)
731:•
688:)
684:•
209::
201:,
197:,
193:,
156:)
54:;
2149:(
2135:(
2121:(
2089:?
2077:)
2073:(
2060:.
2053:.
1892:(
1827:(
1810:(
1787:(
1768:(
1751:(
1735:(
1711:(
1627:(
1611:(
1570:(
1534:(
1514:(
1472:(
1423:(
1375:(
1324:(
1280:(
1194:(
1159:(
1121:(
1075:(
1060:(
1042:(
1008:(
979:(
949:(
942:)
938:(
920:(
905:(
891:(
862:(
839:(
819:(
795:(
766:(
755:(
727:(
680:(
561:.
456:.
351:.
266::
203:4
199:3
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
