1180:
greater congruence between the ethnic group and the state (Gellner 1983, 1, 57; 1992)." Depending on how much coercive pressure one requires a state to apply before qualifying their behaviour as irredentist, Ireland's attitude toward unification with
Northern Ireland could be categorised as potential or actual irredentism. Although, it would be very difficult to argue it falls on the actual side compared to the clearest cases of irredentist action (e.g., Russia's military invasion of Crimea and eastern Ukraine on irredentist claims) considering the generally cooperative relations between Dublin and Westminster for decades.
504:
483:
411:
390:
784:
1490:, do not involve the annexation by the current Irish state but instead involve abolishing all current political entities on the island, including the Republic. This is a revolutionary goal as opposed to an irredentist one, and although Ó Brádaigh is no longer a leading republican the presence of such ideas in the movement past and present mean that it is dishonest to classify the very idea of a United Ireland as "Irredentist."
316:
712:
306:
285:
254:
223:
624:
603:
634:
1242:
I mean your point about
Ireland's lack of military action regarding this issue would absolve a lot of other types of irredentism such as the concept of a Greater Israel, Greater Albania, Greater Greece etc. etc. since the official states representing the ethnic groups from which the irredentist ideas
1047:
I'm confused why you think the shortdesc should be neutral on the issue (though I still strongly disagree it is) while the article is not? The short desc should match the judgements of the article, which clearly is about a proposition to form
Ireland into a single state, a state of being which is not
996:
Yawn! Of course
Ireland is not now "a single sovereign state" in reality, but quite a lot of people think it is in a notional, theoretical sort of way. What is the "ambiguity" at present? Don't you think "form" an odd choice of word? Why should a short desc needlessly upset people with a "specific
1304:
Why do you not see the term as useful here, exactly? I think using it for the
Spanish claim on Gibraltar is perfectly justified, but are Spanish claims on Gibraltar rooted in the idea of reuniting the 'ethnic Spanish' population of Gibraltar with the Spanish state? I thought it was more about trade
1254:
Again, the concept of a United
Ireland is blatantly irredentist, it has been openly and officially supported by the Republic of Ireland since its inception (and the states preceding it), it has led to terrorist organizations and violent militias attempting to forcibly implement it upon a population
1032:
That is even more POV to old-school
Nationalists. The advantage of the current wording is that it takes no position on whether Ireland currently is or is not a single state, which imo in a shortdesc is different from being "ambiguous". If any reader is puzzled by this, reading the first para of the
1092:
have disagreed with, and that this neutrality is an advantage. My argument is that if that is true and the short desc can be read either way, than it should be edited to unambiguously take the position of the article, which is clear that
Ireland is not a single state. If the short description can
1011:
I do not think there is ambiguity, which is why I wanted to change it to the phrasing "Proposition to form
Ireland into a single state" which to me is unambiguously synonymous but less wordy than "Proposition that all of Ireland should be a single sovereign state" . However, you seem to think the
967:
I do not understand the reading of "Proposition that all of
Ireland should be a single sovereign state" as meaning Ireland already IS a single sovereign state except in the most contrived of interpretations. Regardless, the lede specifically states "At present, the island is divided politically;
933:
I don't follow the problem either. Neither sentence is totally satisfactory in its precision, but that is to be expected when trying to compress it toward 40 characters. The important point here, I assume, is whether the proposed shorter version is communicating essentially the same notion as the
1214:
I don't think the lack of military action on the behalf of the Republic of Ireland really absolves the irredentist nature of Irish unification supporters, particularly considering there's been a pervasive history of terrorist origanizations and violent militant action attempting to advance those
918:
I have read the article. "Proposition to form Ireland into a single state" and "Proposition that all of Ireland should be a single sovereign state" are both phrases that imply Ireland is not currently a single sovereign state, so I'm unsure how your comment "According to some it already is" only
1179:
irredentism. Take the following definition (from Siroky and Hale's 2017 piece) typical of political-science/IR literature on the topic: " defined as a state's use of military force to advance a claim of ownership over territory in a neighboring state on the basis of coethnicity, and to create a
1362:
Weird, it's almost like some editors perhaps think Irish irredentism isn't irredentism and shouldn't be called it... because you feel it's different, like maybe you support the idea and thus don't really want a term like irredentism to be slapped on it, because that makes it look kind of ugly,
1472:
Or at least not necessarily so. Irredentism is, according to Merriam-Webster (cited in the irredentism wikipedia article) defines irredentism as "a political principle or policy directed toward the incorporation of irredentas within the boundaries of their historically or ethnically related
1087:
and reads to me as condescending, even if that is not the intended tone. In hopes to wrap this up, a quick summary: my understanding of your argument is that you think the short desc is neutral in its stance on whether Ireland is a single or multiple states, a position I and
934:
present longer version. Each reads identically to me as a proposition for one state to comprise the island of Ireland. The only notable word lost is "sovereign", but sovereignty is implicit in being a state, so I don't see how it affects the meaning of the sentence. --
972:), but even if you don't think it already meets that understanding, it is clear the article considers that Ireland is currently NOT a single sovereign state and "United Ireland" is the concept of forming it into one. Ireland clearly does not meet the definition at
948:
There is a fairly large body of opinion that Ireland is already "a single state", & has been since 1916/18 etc. Since the readers of this article are disproportionately likely to hold this view, I see no reason to needlessly piss them off just for the dreadful
1485:
A key term here is "political unit;" it presupposes that irredentists hope to annex the irredenta to an existing political unit. This may be true for some advocates of a United Ireland, but certainly not all. Some concepts of a UI, such as Ó Brádaigh's
1248:
I'm not really sure what your point was regarding that, that other types of irredentism are more aggressively sought after? That other types of irredentism are taken to more extreme lengths? How does that stop Irish irredentism from being a thing that
1048:
currently the case. The current shortdesc is 66 characters, the proposed is 47 characters. What verb do you suggest better fits than "form"? We should avoid "unify" since it is part of the title. Perhaps "join" is sufficiently neutral. --
1012:
current form has a level of ambiguity that allows people who already believe Ireland is a "notional, theoretical" single state to be satisfied. I think that is not the case, and am looking to shorten it down to around 40 characters per
1507:
By the way, if you would categorize such concepts as mentioned above as irredentist simply because they involve transferring territory from one state to another not-yet-existent polity then you would have to accept that
1405:
What a shocker. So that leaves Irish irredentism as the ONLY form of irredentism on Knowledge which, for some bizarre reason, is still not explicitly stated to actually BE a form of irredentism in the opening sentence.
1535:
I'm going to add a heading/sub-heading on constitutional discussion including references to Ireland's future aince there is no real mentions of potential contituional arrangements and/or discssion. Is this agreeable?
1512:
is irredentism (and, by the logic of the recent editors of this page, mention so in the first line) as a Kurdish state would necessarily have to absorb territory from at least one of four non-Kurdish existing states.
1255:
that overwhelmingly does not want it (and that's not just the non-Irish majority population of Northern Ireland that doesn't want a United Ireland, by any stretch of the imagination as polls consistently have shown).
1064:
I've taken out "sovereign" as not really needed. There is now barely any length difference. A flat 40 char limit is just silly, & frankly you should be doing something useful with your editing time, rather than
153:
1187:
say or do not say about the term. If you believe sources discussing Irish unification and irredentism are being overlooked, you're always welcome to present the material here for encyclopedic contributions.
1433:
I've gone ahead and simply edited the opening sentence to include the fact that Irish unification is, in fact, a form of irredentism, since it quite clearly is under any traditional meaning of the word.
1288:
I don't see the term as useful here, any more than relating to, say, the Spanish claim on Gibraltar. The ROI support has been for several decades subject to the process in the GFA, rather than absolute.
1352:
In fact as far as I know the idea of a Greater Israel has never experienced ANY endorsement from the Israeli state and has NEVER been pushed for or condoned or supported by any Israeli government.
1347:
The State of Israel also has unequivocally denounced the idea of a Greater Israel, even going so far as to claim the idea of a Greater Israel is 'dead' (in the words of a former recent Israeli PM).
968:
Ireland has been partitioned since May 1921" and the short description should reflect this understanding of the current situation. I believe it already does (but needs to be shortened to meet
1614:
680:
1569:
1609:
1584:
465:
455:
214:
1589:
1579:
690:
147:
1395:
Oh, and wouldn't you know it, the article on the Status of Gibraltar literally features the word irredentist in the opening sentence too, regarding Spain's claim to it:
1619:
1183:
Irrespective of my speculation there as to why the article is currently contained in irredentism categories, use of the term will ultimately be guided by whatever
953:. "Proposition that all of Ireland should be a single sovereign state" does not prejudge this issue, but the other does. I can't agree each "reads identically ".
1069:
stuff. The article is neutral - it has the space to be, and is written by people (not me) who understand the subject. I think we have discussed this enough now.
549:
543:
431:
1400:"Gibraltar, a British Overseas Territory, located at the southern tip of the Iberian Peninsula, is the subject of an irredentist territorial claim by Spain."
656:
79:
1093:
only be read that Ireland is not a single state, than the two proposed short descriptions are identical. I'm not sure which aspect you disagree with. --
1016:. Do you have a suggestion that is better than "form", which does not strike me as odd. Perhaps "Proposition to merge Ireland into a single state"? --
980:
centralized government", so there is no need to leave the short description ambiguous just to not bother someone with a specific political leaning. --
418:
395:
1564:
537:
372:
362:
1599:
1574:
647:
608:
585:
575:
44:
885:, could you explain further your comment about my short desc revision? My main goal is to shorten the number of characters to 40 or less, per
1559:
85:
1514:
1491:
1435:
1407:
1369:
1316:
1261:
1216:
1209:
My point is, as with other forms of irredentism, it should really be included in the opening of the article, so that there's no ambiguity.
1145:
1479:
An irredenta is "a territory historically or ethnically related to one political unit but under the political control of another".<<
1604:
1594:
1172:
Are you referring to a certain edit or revert? The page is in fact contained in the categories of "irredentism" and "Irish irredentism".
338:
1357:
And yet, oddly enough, the Knowledge article on Greater Israel mentions its irredentist nature in the opening SENTENCE, I believe.
533:
1310:
If there is some heavy ethnic motivation and emphasis behind Spanish claims on Gibraltar then by all means I'm happy to hear it.
99:
30:
168:
104:
20:
135:
827:
822:
817:
810:
805:
800:
329:
290:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
74:
768:
722:
265:
1260:
It's an irredentist concept, it doesn't stop being irredentist just because it's a fairly impotent incarnation of it.
860:
529:
516:
488:
65:
764:
222:
185:
1190:
Lastly, if your comment was not referring to a recent edit or a specific item in the article, then just remember
430:
related topics on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1083:
I do not think it is appropriate for you to tell me how I should spend my editing time, it really is quite poor
839:
233:
129:
1518:
1495:
745:: All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as
1439:
1411:
1373:
1320:
1265:
1220:
1149:
253:
639:
503:
482:
109:
125:
756:
767:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
1450:
1422:
1384:
1331:
1315:
Calls for a United Ireland are, and always have been, absolutely rooted in ethnic irredentism, however.
1276:
1231:
1161:
1098:
1053:
1021:
985:
924:
894:
271:
1342:"The ROI support has been for several decades subject to the process in the GFA, rather than absolute."
175:
1541:
1141:
1509:
1191:
1084:
1066:
1013:
969:
950:
886:
760:
423:
161:
55:
655:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
337:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
845:
729:, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
238:
70:
1294:
1199:
1074:
1038:
1002:
958:
939:
909:
427:
410:
389:
51:
1446:
1418:
1380:
1327:
1272:
1227:
1157:
1094:
1049:
1017:
981:
920:
890:
841:
783:
736:
652:
235:
141:
1363:
doesn't it? It doesn't make the political idea of a United Ireland look all that justified.
1537:
1243:
spring haven't taken any kind of military action historically, or at least in a long time.
973:
1474:
1480:
525:
510:
321:
24:
1545:
1553:
746:
528:. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the
1290:
1195:
1184:
1089:
1070:
1034:
998:
954:
935:
905:
880:
726:
711:
532:, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the
1487:
735:
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in
629:
311:
305:
284:
1033:
article will soon set them straight. How many characters is it currently?
843:
237:
520:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's coverage of the ancient
1522:
1499:
1454:
1426:
1388:
1335:
1298:
1280:
1235:
1203:
1165:
1102:
1078:
1057:
1042:
1025:
1006:
989:
962:
943:
928:
913:
898:
889:, and I'm not sure what issue you had with the phrasing I introduced.--
334:
1305:
and taxation, but I'm not particularly well versed in the situation.
904:
Ok, I imagine you are new to the subject. Why not read the article?
623:
602:
521:
846:
777:
725:
procedure applies to this article. This article is related to
706:
247:
239:
15:
1175:
I assume it is contained in those categories as a case of
919:
applies to the shorter, closer to 40 character version. --
755:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
1475:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irredentism
160:
1481:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irredentas
1138:
How exactly is Irish 'unification' not irredentism?
651:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
422:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
333:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1615:Top-importance Northern Ireland-related articles
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1531:Constitutional proposals and "Ireland's future"
1368:But I'm sure that's not the case now, is it...
1570:Start-Class Ireland articles of Top-importance
1610:Start-Class Northern Ireland-related articles
854:This page has archives. Sections older than
174:
8:
1585:Top-importance Irish Republicanism articles
251:
1139:
997:political leaning" when there is no need?
597:
477:
384:
279:
440:Knowledge:WikiProject Irish Republicanism
1590:WikiProject Irish Republicanism articles
1580:Start-Class Irish Republicanism articles
443:Template:WikiProject Irish Republicanism
976:of " a political entity represented by
599:
479:
386:
281:
1620:All WikiProject Northern Ireland pages
864:when more than 4 sections are present.
665:Knowledge:WikiProject Northern Ireland
668:Template:WikiProject Northern Ireland
7:
718:Warning: active arbitration remedies
645:This article is within the scope of
416:This article is within the scope of
327:This article is within the scope of
270:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
858:may be automatically archived by
671:Northern Ireland-related articles
782:
710:
632:
622:
601:
502:
481:
409:
388:
314:
304:
283:
252:
221:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1565:Top-importance Ireland articles
685:This article has been rated as
580:This article has been rated as
460:This article has been rated as
419:WikiProject Irish Republicanism
367:This article has been rated as
1:
1600:Top-importance Celts articles
1575:All WikiProject Ireland pages
1103:14:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
1079:14:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
1058:13:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
1043:18:24, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
1026:04:19, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
1007:02:28, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
990:22:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
963:18:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
944:14:50, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
929:14:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
914:14:24, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
899:20:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
769:contentious topics procedures
659:and see a list of open tasks.
434:and see a list of open tasks.
347:Knowledge:WikiProject Ireland
341:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1560:Start-Class Ireland articles
1546:01:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
1530:
1455:20:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
1427:20:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
1389:20:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
1336:20:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
1281:20:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
1236:20:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
1166:20:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
1152:) 17:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
648:WikiProject Northern Ireland
446:Irish Republicanism articles
350:Template:WikiProject Ireland
560:Knowledge:WikiProject Celts
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1636:
1605:WikiProject Celts articles
1595:Start-Class Celts articles
1268:) 00:17, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
1204:21:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
691:project's importance scale
586:project's importance scale
563:Template:WikiProject Celts
466:project's importance scale
373:project's importance scale
1523:23:35, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
1500:23:24, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
1442:) 00:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
1414:) 00:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
1376:) 00:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
1323:) 00:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
1223:) 22:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
771:before editing this page.
684:
617:
579:
497:
459:
404:
366:
299:
278:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1473:political unit".<<
765:normal editorial process
1299:00:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
640:Northern Ireland portal
514:is within the scope of
861:Lowercase sigmabot III
761:standards of behaviour
260:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
737:limited circumstances
215:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
757:purpose of Knowledge
105:No original research
1510:Kurdish nationalism
524:and the modern day
437:Irish Republicanism
424:Irish republicanism
396:Irish Republicanism
330:WikiProject Ireland
723:contentious topics
719:
266:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1457:
1429:
1391:
1338:
1283:
1238:
1168:
1153:
1144:comment added by
868:
867:
833:
832:
776:
775:
717:
705:
704:
701:
700:
697:
696:
596:
595:
592:
591:
517:WikiProject Celts
476:
475:
472:
471:
428:Irish nationalism
383:
382:
379:
378:
246:
245:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1627:
1444:
1416:
1378:
1325:
1270:
1225:
1155:
884:
863:
847:
797:
796:
786:
778:
747:outside opinions
714:
707:
673:
672:
669:
666:
663:
662:Northern Ireland
653:Northern Ireland
642:
637:
636:
635:
626:
619:
618:
613:
609:Northern Ireland
605:
598:
568:
567:
564:
561:
558:
506:
499:
498:
493:
485:
478:
448:
447:
444:
441:
438:
413:
406:
405:
400:
392:
385:
355:
354:
353:Ireland articles
351:
348:
345:
324:
319:
318:
317:
308:
301:
300:
295:
287:
280:
263:
257:
256:
248:
240:
226:
225:
216:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1635:
1634:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1550:
1549:
1533:
1470:
1468:Not Irredentism
1443:
1415:
1401:
1396:
1377:
1364:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1343:
1324:
1311:
1306:
1269:
1256:
1250:
1244:
1224:
1210:
1154:
1135:
974:Sovereign state
878:
875:
859:
848:
842:
791:
759:, any expected
752:
670:
667:
664:
661:
660:
638:
633:
631:
611:
565:
562:
559:
556:
555:
491:
445:
442:
439:
436:
435:
398:
352:
349:
346:
343:
342:
320:
315:
313:
293:
264:on Knowledge's
261:
242:
241:
236:
213:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1633:
1631:
1623:
1622:
1617:
1612:
1607:
1602:
1597:
1592:
1587:
1582:
1577:
1572:
1567:
1562:
1552:
1551:
1532:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1515:173.15.152.245
1492:173.15.152.245
1469:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1445:Blocked sock.
1436:88.110.123.130
1432:
1417:Blocked sock.
1408:88.110.123.130
1404:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1379:Blocked sock.
1370:88.110.123.130
1367:
1365:
1361:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1351:
1349:
1346:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1326:Blocked sock.
1317:88.110.123.130
1314:
1312:
1309:
1307:
1303:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1271:Blocked sock.
1262:88.110.123.130
1259:
1257:
1253:
1251:
1247:
1245:
1241:
1226:Blocked sock.
1217:88.110.123.130
1213:
1211:
1208:
1188:
1181:
1173:
1156:Blocked sock.
1146:88.110.123.130
1137:
1134:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
931:
874:
871:
866:
865:
853:
850:
849:
844:
840:
838:
835:
834:
831:
830:
825:
820:
814:
813:
808:
803:
793:
792:
787:
781:
774:
773:
751:
750:
740:
732:
715:
703:
702:
699:
698:
695:
694:
687:Top-importance
683:
677:
676:
674:
657:the discussion
644:
643:
627:
615:
614:
612:Top‑importance
606:
594:
593:
590:
589:
582:Top-importance
578:
572:
571:
569:
566:Celts articles
526:Celtic nations
511:United Ireland
507:
495:
494:
492:Top‑importance
486:
474:
473:
470:
469:
462:Top-importance
458:
452:
451:
449:
432:the discussion
414:
402:
401:
399:Top‑importance
393:
381:
380:
377:
376:
369:Top-importance
365:
359:
358:
356:
339:the discussion
326:
325:
322:Ireland portal
309:
297:
296:
294:Top‑importance
288:
276:
275:
269:
258:
244:
243:
234:
232:
231:
228:
227:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
25:United Ireland
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1632:
1621:
1618:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1608:
1606:
1603:
1601:
1598:
1596:
1593:
1591:
1588:
1586:
1583:
1581:
1578:
1576:
1573:
1571:
1568:
1566:
1563:
1561:
1558:
1557:
1555:
1548:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1511:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1482:
1476:
1467:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1441:
1437:
1431:
1430:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1413:
1409:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1375:
1371:
1366:
1360:
1355:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1322:
1318:
1313:
1308:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1287:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1267:
1263:
1258:
1252:
1246:
1240:
1239:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1222:
1218:
1212:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1132:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1091:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1004:
1000:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
966:
965:
964:
960:
956:
952:
947:
946:
945:
941:
937:
932:
930:
926:
922:
917:
916:
915:
911:
907:
903:
902:
901:
900:
896:
892:
888:
882:
872:
870:
862:
857:
852:
851:
837:
836:
829:
826:
824:
821:
819:
816:
815:
812:
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
798:
795:
794:
790:
785:
780:
779:
772:
770:
766:
762:
758:
753:
748:
744:
741:
738:
734:
733:
730:
728:
724:
716:
713:
709:
708:
692:
688:
682:
679:
678:
675:
658:
654:
650:
649:
641:
630:
628:
625:
621:
620:
616:
610:
607:
604:
600:
587:
583:
577:
574:
573:
570:
553:
552:
547:
546:
541:
540:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
518:
513:
512:
508:
505:
501:
500:
496:
490:
487:
484:
480:
467:
463:
457:
454:
453:
450:
433:
429:
425:
421:
420:
415:
412:
408:
407:
403:
397:
394:
391:
387:
374:
370:
364:
361:
360:
357:
340:
336:
332:
331:
323:
312:
310:
307:
303:
302:
298:
292:
289:
286:
282:
277:
273:
267:
259:
255:
250:
249:
230:
229:
224:
220:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1534:
1471:
1215:exact aims.
1192:WP:NOTAFORUM
1176:
1140:— Preceding
1136:
1085:WP:ETIQUETTE
1067:WP:SHORTDESC
1014:WP:SHORTDESC
977:
970:WP:SHORTDESC
951:WP:SHORTDESC
887:WP:SHORTDESC
876:
869:
855:
788:
754:
742:
731:
727:the Troubles
720:
686:
646:
581:
550:
544:
538:
530:project page
515:
509:
461:
417:
368:
328:
272:WikiProjects
218:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1447:Mutt Lunker
1419:Mutt Lunker
1381:Mutt Lunker
1328:Mutt Lunker
1273:Mutt Lunker
1228:Mutt Lunker
1158:Mutt Lunker
1133:Irredentism
1095:Cerebral726
1050:Cerebral726
1018:Cerebral726
982:Cerebral726
921:Cerebral726
891:Cerebral726
262:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
1554:Categories
1538:Titus Gold
873:short desc
743:Neutrality
534:discussion
1177:potential
828:Archive 6
823:Archive 5
818:Archive 4
811:Archive 3
806:Archive 2
801:Archive 1
763:, or any
536:. Please
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1488:Éire Nua
1142:unsigned
789:Archives
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1291:Johnbod
1249:exists?
1196:Scuoise
1090:Scuoise
1071:Johnbod
1035:Johnbod
999:Johnbod
955:Johnbod
936:Scuoise
906:Johnbod
881:Johnbod
856:28 days
689:on the
584:on the
464:on the
371:on the
344:Ireland
335:Ireland
291:Ireland
219:28 days
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1536:Thanks
551:Assess
548:, and
545:Create
268:scale.
126:Google
1484:: -->
1483:: -->
1478:: -->
1477:: -->
1185:WP:RS
557:Celts
522:Celts
489:Celts
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1542:talk
1519:talk
1496:talk
1451:talk
1440:talk
1423:talk
1412:talk
1385:talk
1374:talk
1332:talk
1321:talk
1295:talk
1277:talk
1266:talk
1232:talk
1221:talk
1200:talk
1162:talk
1150:talk
1099:talk
1075:talk
1054:talk
1039:talk
1022:talk
1003:talk
986:talk
959:talk
940:talk
925:talk
910:talk
895:talk
877:Hey
721:The
539:Join
426:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
978:one
681:Top
576:Top
456:Top
363:Top
176:TWL
1556::
1544:)
1521:)
1498:)
1453:)
1425:)
1387:)
1334:)
1297:)
1279:)
1234:)
1202:)
1194:.
1164:)
1101:)
1077:)
1056:)
1041:)
1024:)
1005:)
988:)
961:)
942:)
927:)
912:)
897:)
542:,
217::
209:,
205:,
201:,
197:,
193:,
156:)
54:;
1540:(
1517:(
1494:(
1449:(
1438:(
1421:(
1410:(
1383:(
1372:(
1330:(
1319:(
1293:(
1275:(
1264:(
1230:(
1219:(
1198:(
1160:(
1148:(
1097:(
1073:(
1052:(
1037:(
1020:(
1001:(
984:(
957:(
938:(
923:(
908:(
893:(
883::
879:@
749:.
739:)
693:.
588:.
554:.
468:.
375:.
274::
211:6
207:5
203:4
199:3
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.