Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Democratic Party (United States)

Source 📝

4212:
seemingly agree with each other. With that in mind, I believe it’s important for a party’s ideology and position to be labeled generally but also correctly on Wiki. Analyzing the Congressional House caucuses of the Democratic Party, it’s fair to label its “ideology” as “progressivism” and “liberalism”; this takes into account the fact there are two major caucuses that disagree with each other over economic policy (“third way” in the NDC and “social liberalism” in the CPC) yet still adhere to the tenants of “liberalism” and “progressivism”. However, factions such as PSC (“centrism”) and BDC (“fiscal conservatism”) shouldn’t be ignored either; therefore in the “factions” section of “ideology”, it’s only fair that “centrism”, “fiscal conservatism”, “social liberalism”, and “third way” should be listed. As far as the Democratic Party’s “position”, per analyzation of the caucuses, it should be “center to center-left”. While many argue that it should include “center-right”, many also forget that the BDC no longer adheres to “social conservatism” and that no faction of the Democratic Party adheres to an economic policy that is explicitly on the right (“fiscal conservative” policy is usually referred to as centrist and is derived from “economic liberalism”). While many argue that it should not include “center”, many also ignore the fact that the largest caucus (NDC) barely touches the Left. I hope this helps the discussion.
3710:
Labour Party and the Conservative Party in the UK, as the Labour Party is a member of the centre-left European grouping whereas the Conservatives are members of the right-wing (not center-right) European grouping and also underwent a rightward shift. In all cases, I would just have a footnote concisely summarizing the debate rather than ambiguous and confusing "Center-left to left-wing" or "Center-right to right-wing". Same thing for "Ideology": in the case of Democrats, I would just list liberalism, linking to the "Modern liberalism in the United States" article, and have a footnote explaining the other ideological factions within the party and do it at an historical level not limited to recentism (after all, if we are going with the ambiguous "to", why not actually summarize the party's historical position on the spectrum and explain the reversal between the Democrats and Republicans from left-wing to right-wing and
3806:
capitalism through reforms rather than overthrow it by revolution. Thus, were the pre-World War II social-democratic parties left-wing or center-left, or did they become center-left in the post-war period? I always assumed they were center-left (like the modern center-left, they were more reformists than revolutionists) and that was changed was the political climate and the Overton window. Plus, were the revolutionary liberals far-left? The French Revolutionaries were not all far-left, and in fact far-left was used to refer to those further left of the Jacobins, like the HĂ©bertists, and the Jacobins (revolutionaries) were left-wing. I think this should be clearer and discussed within the context of center-left politics, with a section expanding on the American context.
3782:, I like "Centrism" because it represents the "Big tent", which I would not use because it is not a proper political position on the spectrum, of the Democratic Party, which is a liberal, not social-democratic, party. Internationally, even left-liberal parties, despite its ideological name, are centrists who effectivly act as the center-left parties, such as in Canada (with the social-democratic NDP as center-left) or the United States. But I would still group them as centrists because the centre is always moving, and just because they may not be equidistant between the Left or the Right, and thus be closer to the center-left, it does not mean they automatically became center-left just because the spectrum and thus the center moved rightward 3475:
historical trajectory to build complex alliances with social groups other than the working class and to deal with unusually powerful capitalists ... Taken together, the three chapters devoted to the United States show that the center-left in America faces much the same set of problems as elsewhere and, especially in light of the election results from 2008, that the Democratic Party's potential to win elections, despite its current slide in approval, may be at least equal to that of any center-left party in Europe ... Despite the setback in the 2010 midterms, together the foregoing trends have put the Democrats in a position to eventually build a dominant center-left majority in the United States.
4514: 4296: 4131: 3996: 3916: 3701:: I really dislike this usage, it is ambiguous and confusing. What does it mean? That reliable sources have variously described it as "centrist" and "left-wing"? If so, why not have a footnote explicitily saying this with a list of sources? I would avoid "Left-wing" at all for the same reasons explained by TFD. Is it meant to describe the factions within the party, as you seem to imply here? Why not actually add a proper "Factions" parameter to the infobox as I tried to do years ago because users keep adding anyway an artificial 368: 647: 620: 587: 1601:(John Schwarzmantel NYU Press, 1998), p. 68: "Liberalism,in its broadest sense, was a philosophy or set of ideas that gave primacy to the idea of individual freedom, the freedom of the individual as the supreme social unit, untrammelled by interference from the state, other individuals or society as a whole." Conservatism is described as either "to deny modernity and return to a premodern society" or a "criticism of modernity and its features." (p. 64) Premodern means before 1500. 889: 750: 657: 433: 963: 813: 945: 782: 823: 1027: 4732: 4553: 480: 4470: 4252: 4079: 3947: 3872: 2600:, obliged by their different historical trajectory to build complex alliances with social groups other than the working class and to deal with unusually powerful capitalists ... Taken together, the three chapters devoted to the United States show that the center-left in America faces much the same set of problems as elsewhere and, especially in light of the election results from 2008, that 290: 2232:, the only stance with reliable sources. Our most reliable sources present the party as center-left, without qualifications; the most reliable presents it as a near opposite of the GOP. The center-left by definition includes both the center and left, making the clarification of "centrist and left-wing factions" utterly redundant. Also, re:Intelligencier - it's an opinion piece, and it's a 3790:" (e.g. even many radical democratic socialists are in fact both reformists and revolutionaries, and even when advocating revolution, they see it more as a democratic revolution rather than a violent one). Also there is a fact to consider left-liberals as center-left, even in the United States: there was an early 20th century liberal, whose name evades me (never mind, I found him: it was 320: 578: 3776:, and as long as it explains this, discusses the scholarly debate (I would add a summary of the whole evolution of the party and do the same for the Republicans), and reflects that, to quote TFD, "By center-left we mean socialist and green parties and, in the United States, the Democratic Party", I am perfectly fine and in full support of "Center-left (with footnote)". 913: 4498:
reflect social liberalism and third way politics, and the party does not resemble other center-left social democratic parties. The party's RILE score is also sourced as placing it as a center to center-left party. Listing it as center-left is misleading and assumes the idea that the Democratic party has a prominent view of social democracy, which is untrue.
3587:, because it explains the Democratic Party as ideologically less cohesive (though the Republican Party in recent years has more factions) and center-left. The "Polarized by Degrees" source explains how the Democratic Party is center-left but differs from Europe's center-left because it relies more on the college-educated instead of organized labor. 3035:
may be a tribute to its capabilities of survival and adaptation—as well as a certain talent for infiltration and disguise. The left, to the extent one exists in America, has appropriated the vocabulary of liberalism, and when all is said and done abandoned much of its original content and tone while clinging to remnants of its social objectives.
4426:
Neither of the sources say the Dems have an "increasingly progressive economic agenda," The first source, which argues it does, says that the consensus is it doesn't. The second source says that the neo-liberal paradigm, pursued by both parties, has been challenged by Sanders on the left and Trump on
4376:
Editors are supposed to ensure that articles reflect reliable sources, not their personal opinions. I would point out that most sources, especially academic literature, are usually written by people with college degrees as well. While that may cause a bias in reliable sources, it's not something that
3705:
parameter (as is also done here for the "Ideology" parameter in this very article) so we can list either official factions and/or ideological wings? In such cases, I would just put "Center-left", "Centrist", "Center-left", "Left-wing", or "Right-wing", and have a footnote explaining why the party has
3034:
The concept of "the left" is a European import that always has existed uneasily in the United States. ... It has especially struggled for existance in that most liberal of societies, the United States. That we discuss the left at all in an American context at the beginning of the twenty-first century
2719:
defines center-left as "a variety of political forces, among them social liberals, social democrats, democratic socialists, progressives, greens, and human rights campaigners." (p. 5) Others, including most editors in this conversation, may define it differently so for example by excluding democratic
2204:
Over the last decade, the Democratic Party has moved significantly to the left on almost every salient political issue ... on social, cultural and religious issues, particularly those related to criminal justice, race, abortion and gender identity, the Democrats have taken up ideological stances that
1339:
The U.S. actually is special. It has two parties, neither of which have a statement of ideology or enforces ideological conformity. IOW you cannot be expelled from either party for any reason and you cannot be stopped from running under their banner. Furthermore, state governments are involved in the
1155:
That is a non-sequitor. Unique party structures do not do away with a political position. Did the European Greens temporarily surrender their ideology by having open primaries for the 2013 European parliament elections? Did the French Socialists suddenly become non ideological because they started to
4497:
I believe that the political position of the party should be changed from "Center Left" to "Majority Center to Center-Left" With Factions listed as Center-Right and Left Wing. The Democratic party is a big tent party and this is widely known and established. The prominent policies and economic views
4211:
I understand there is discourse on both the Democratic Party and Republican Party Wiki talk pages over their respective ideologies and positions. Because there are a lot of factors in this discussion (including personal bias, political affiliation, and overall coherency), it’s no surprise no one can
3851:
Democrats have become the home of highly-educated citizens with progressive social views who prefer credentialed experts to make policy decisions, while Republicans have become the populist champions of white voters without college degrees who increasingly distrust teachers, scientists, journalists,
3123:
Democrats have become the home of highly-educated citizens with progressive social views who prefer credentialed experts to make policy decisions, while Republicans have become the populist champions of white voters without college degrees who increasingly distrust teachers, scientists, journalists,
2962:
An additional source with more information on how the Democratic Party is further to the right than European left-wing parties, and how there is no strong socialist or equivalent "left-wing" movement in the United States. I think with this source, there shouldn't be any more confusion that there are
2771:
While I understand that in some contexts, the Democrats can be seen as center-left, in other contexts, they can be seen as centrist or center-right. It is misleading to describe them as center-left without explaining what is meant. The footnote should say, "By center-left we mean socialist and green
2002:
that champions fiscal responsibility, balanced budgets, procedural norms, a civil public discourse, strong border enforcement, a globe-spanning military empire — and, like the vast majority of the American people, a more ambitious and generous social-welfare state, higher taxes on the rich, abortion
4046:
3). although you believe the Democratic Party should be listed as “center-right”, you can’t provide a reliable source (or any source, really) that supports your claim. even if factions such as the BDC and NDC are capitalist and adhere to “fiscally conservative” policies on the economy, that doesn’t
2767:
The Democratic Party is an outlier in the book because it is the only major that does not have Marxist roots. While Marx was advocating the overthrow of capitalism, Democrats were building capitalism. However, it is the most left-wing of the two major U.S. parties, is identified with minorities and
1604:
So there's a book from a U.S. academic publisher using the same terminology as people outside the U.S. The debate in the U.S. is not about whether or not to accept liberal principles, but how they should be applied. The term conservative entered usage when FDR used the term to defame his opponents.
1543:
First, Knowledge (XXG) is aimed at an international audience, not the U.S. specifically. Second, although Americans use the terms left and right, liberal and conservative, in a different way when describing their politics, academic literature in the U.S. uses internationally understood definitions,
3000:
There is "liberalism" or "progressivism" in the United States of many hues, but with no "social democracy" or politically viable socialism to the left. ... Definitions thus push us towards questions about American "exceptionalism" in the sense that the center of political gravity is further to the
2438:
Of the four sources above, Guardino and Snyder are largely irrelevant. They do not describe the party as centrist, they comment on its efforts to reach agreements with the right-wingers. Marantz is talking about moderates dominating the party, not centrists. Rae describes the party as both liberal
3805:
is its evolution, because it makes it appear as though anti-capitalism is only a far-left position when in fact it was taken by center-left social democratic parties in the 20th century, with the difference being that the center-left was more moderate and pragmatic, and attempted more to trascend
1184:
I would definitely agree. There are a number of sources noting that the party has notable centrist and conservative/right-leaning factions. While I don't deny that there are certainly some "social justice warrior" progressives in the party, they've become a big tent (even "conservative") party of
1140:
Can you name any other parties that have no control over membership or who their members nominate for office? In some states, such as Vermont, the party has no membership at all. Can you name any other parties that don't have members? Also, neither party has a statement of ideology. Also, primary
3785:
At the same time, I think "a variety of political forces, among them social liberals, social democrats, democratic socialists, progressives, greens, and human rights campaigners" does not necessarily exclude left-liberal, and thus I would include both democratic socialists (e.g. left-wing social
3474:
Including the American Democratic Party in a comparative analysis of center-left parties is unorthodox, since unlike Europe, America has not produced a socialist movement tied to a strong union movement. Yet the Democrats may have become center-left before anyone else, obliged by their different
3234:
does not list European Socialists with the Democratic Party. Specifically in the lead of the page, "Centre-left politics are contrasted with far-left politics that reject capitalism or advocate revolution." I don't think people will be confused and think that the Democratic Party are socialists.
2734:
I think this is covered by the factions section only having centrism and progressivism, not democratic socialism, greens, and whatnot. The book also describes European center-left parties, which are generally more left than the American center-left, and which it acknowledges followed a different
3709:
In the case of Democrats, I would go with "Center-left" as that is the more common indicator in the United States (or "Centrist" if we go by scholarly groupings as explained by TFD) and "Right-wing" for the Republicans to underscore their much more significant rightward case. Same thing for the
4042:
2). while there is a significant amount of corruption within our government, most, if not all, of it is consolidated in factions that are pro-business, such as the NDC, which adheres to “third way” liberalism. corruption is not particularly common in a faction such as the CPC, which adheres to
3737:
As I mentioned earlier, these terms have no fixed meaning and therefore create ambiguity rather than clarity when used without context. Note that "What's Left of the Left" cited above defines center-left as the Democratic Party in the U.S. and social democratic parties abroad before saying the
1626:
which is illiberal, it seems liberal principles are wholly accepted among academics but not the population. I was under the impression conservative meant conserving/preserving tradition and generational commons to preserve perspective which make up an ethnic identity/nationality, so it's about
1211:
I would say the most accurate definition would be centre left to centre right. This would include members such as the squad, who fit the profile of centre-left social democrats in many countries, as well as moderate Democrats who are most akin to centre right politicians in peer countries.
3406:
This article has argued that a widespread and fundamental reorientation of the Democratic Party toward decidedly centrist national politics over recent decades fundamentally altered the role of corporate governance, and related issues, in the project of assembling a competitive electoral
1091:
It has been discussed before. Everyone has a different opinion on where various ideologies fit into the political spectrum. The articles already state party ideology in the info-box. There is no need to add where Knowledge (XXG) editors place these ideologies in the political spectrum.
1661:
It appears a general consensus has been reached across the several talk page sections about the political position of the party, and that the consensus is the political position should be added to the page. However, there appears to be disagreement over whether the text should state
3518:
We conclude by considering why Democrats have taken this course, why they are not perceived as having done so, and why, at this fraught juncture for American democratic capitalism, political scientists could learn much from closer examination of the rich world's largest center-left
1189:). If we're going to put a political position in at all, it should be "big tent" or "center" (since that's where the party "establishment" mostly is) with a note that the party has also has a substantial left-leaning faction and a somewhat smaller right-leaning faction. 2828:
The Democratic Party is not socialist or green. There have been many discussions over putting in "democratic socialism" or socialism as a faction of the party and all have failed. Why would we put a footnote saying that the Democratic Party is "socialist and green"?
1106:
Can you point me to these discussions? I am having trouble finding them and I don't think this is a particularly strong argument. American political parties should not get special treatment simply because a lot of editors have opinions on it - but my mind is open.
4827:: "News headlines...are not a reliable source." In your first example, the article actually says that the Democrats have shifted left because a thin majority is now liberal whereas thirty years ago a plurality was moderate. It does not say it is a left-wing party. 3835: 3107: 4350:
For those with post-graduate degrees--63% Harris, 32% Trump. For those with just a Bachelor's or Associate's--51% Harris, 41% Trump. For those who attended but didn't graduate--44% Harris, 46% Trump. And those with HS or less--38% Harris, 53% Trump. This is a
1288:
Centre-left politics support government intervention to a state in which there is still a mixed-market economy, however with social welfare programs. The strongness of those programs varies in different ideologies, e.g. social liberalism and social democracy.
4020:
To be considered left wing, you have to be anticapitalist. Both American political parties are owned by corporations. They are directly responsible for following the views of those who give them donations. That is how freedom of speech works in the United
3755:
either "Center-left" (per the reliable sources and because it effectively acted as the center-left party in the United States) or "Centrist" (per TFD, who I think raises several important and interesting points and that I hope can be further discussed at
1125:
but I can accept that there is no consensus for change for now. I found the attempts at change to be poorly thought out as well. I think people can get "center left" from the ideologies for the democrats and can get "right wing" from the GOP ideologies.
591: 3315:
What are we to make of American parties at the dawn of the twenty-first century? ... The impact of the 1960s civil rights revolution has been to create two more ideologically coherent parties: a generally liberal or center-left party and a conservative
548: 3714:? That would be much better and clear than this ambiguous "to" usage), while finally creating a proper "Factions" parameter where we would list and link the Blue Dog Coalition, New Democrats, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and the like. 4113:
There is a Republican Party (not a Republic Party) which consists of individuals dubbed Republicans (not Republics) There is likewise a Democrat Party (not a Democratic Party) which consists of individuals dubbed Democrats (not Democratics).
1244:
I believe that 'centre to centre-left' is a fair and unbiased position. There are many sources which mention both centrist and centre-left ideologies in the Democratic Party. Any other position is very rare to be supported by a party member.
2153: 2165:
Four years ago, they were the most influential voting bloc on Capitol Hill, more than 50 House Democrats pulling their liberal colleagues to a more centrist, fiscally conservative vision on issues such as health care and Wall Street
4767:
I consolidated most of the references that were duplicated except for the NYMag.com one. This particular one has one source with no quote and another with one. Should they remain separate or should they be consolidated in some way?
4889: 164: 3215:
It depends what your definition of center left is. It seems like a term created in order to group European Socialists with Democrats. What information does it provide readers about the Democrats that the ideology box doesn't?
1075:
Why don't the American political parties have "political position" as a category in their info boxes? Like where it would say "center-left"? Almost all wiki pages about political parties in other countries have this category.
4611: 3794:) who rejected the view that American liberal tradition was inhospitable to anti-capitalist alternatives. So even from a more left-wing perspective, American liberalism can be considered center-left. And that is why I also 4395:--instead describing an "increasingly progressive economic agenda," which likely violates NPOV. The policies may be ideologically progressive, but the price increases and polling point to the contrary in terms of effect. 3259:
For a refresher for those confused with all the references listed and the addition and removal of some of them, this is currently how the political position and the sources used to describe it are proposed to appear.
2265:
to make a definitive position. Both major parties in the USA are big tents, the ideology section is a much better way to figure out what the party stands for. And to reiterate another point made before, the party is
4652:
Being forced out of the 2024 race publicly by members of your own party & donors, because it's believed you've no chance of winning re-election, isn't an overly good legacy. I'm not certain how to handle this.
4879: 1121:
nevermind - found em. I still don't buy the arguments posed, I find them quite off base. Plenty of big tent parties that have a similar character to the Democrats and Republicans have their political positions
493: 1382:
Every country has its own political spectrum. There is no "global political spectrum". There's maybe regional ones - like, say, in Europe, or to some degree the US and Canada - but there's no global spectrum.
2595:
Including the American Democratic Party in a comparative analysis of center-left parties is unorthodox, since unlike Europe, America has not produced a socialist movement tied to a strong union movement. Yet
529: 1324:
with this. The previous RfCs on this topic haven't been particularly persuasive, especially when put into context of similar discussions of other political parties. The US isn't "special" in this regard.
4621:, or that Biden ended 2023 with a job approval rating of 39 percent, the lowest of any president since 1979. Biden's presidency has not been viewed favorably by the public, even if the party's agenda is 1508:
The European spectrum seems to be used as the ‘global spectrum’ on Knowledge (XXG) when looking at other regions’ political pages. Neo-liberalism is centre-right in Europe, which the democrats champion.
4038:
1). nobody is suggesting that the majority of the Democratic Party is “left-wing”; there is a substantial difference between “center-left” and “left-wing”, and discourse on this talk page has made that
2003:
rights, a path to legal status for the undocumented, more regulatory protections for consumers and the environment, and various incremental reforms aimed at increasing labor's share of economic growth.
4894: 2143: 4115: 3900: 3487:
Hacker, Jacob S.; Malpas, Amelia; Pierson, Paul; Zacher, Sam (December 27, 2023). "Bridging the Blue Divide: The Democrats' New Metro Coalition and the Unexpected Prominence of Redistribution".
2619:
Hacker, Jacob S.; Malpas, Amelia; Pierson, Paul; Zacher, Sam (December 27, 2023). "Bridging the Blue Divide: The Democrats' New Metro Coalition and the Unexpected Prominence of Redistribution".
1744: 1877:
What are we to make of American parties at the dawn of the twenty-first century? ... The impact of the 1960s civil rights revolution has been to create two more ideologically coherent parties:
4176: 3147: 2735:
historical path than the American Democratic Party. While I was collecting these sources I came across another one that expounded on this point. I will have to find it again and add it here.
3980: 1985: 1583: 1038: 4909: 3235:
Also, we have a lot of sources now that use center-left to describe the current Democratic Party. Pending some change in this, I think the argument for center-left is strong at this time.
687: 1673:
I have included several of the sources I've found about this topic below. Thank you Toa for trimming some of the other sources I found that were not as reliable as these (I included the
4929: 1354:
how does that make it special? Lots of countries have unique political systems. Lots of parties don't state an overriding ideology and have factions. That's why we rely on secondary RS
158: 55: 4859: 2720:
socialists. It's circular: if by center-left we include the ideology of the Democratic Party, it is center-left. OTOH, if we define centrism as liberalism, then the party is centrist.
4989: 4919: 4628:
Biden is still the incumbent president, and there are other events that could be mentioned. Also, Biden's presidential legacy will almost certainly be affected by the winner of the
4377:
Knowledge (XXG) articles are supposed to question. Basically, if someone comes here, they want to see an article similar to what they would see in an introductory polisci textbook.
2650:
We conclude by considering why Democrats have taken this course, why they are not perceived as having done so, and why, at this fraught juncture for American democratic capitalism,
764: 4402:
over the party's ideology and place on the political spectrum, and thinly-veiled disagreement over many of its positions, is likely because most editors have college degrees. See
2753:
said, political positions take into account the standards of the individual country and independent sources, and generally not international standards (which are hard to define).
1170:
Could someone revert the edit saying that the Dems are Centre-left? They have so many diverse factions and their economic policy certainly isn't Centre-left so this is inaccurate
4347:
It appears the diploma divide has only grown stronger, per Pew Research data. I'm a graduate student applying to PhD program in statistics this fall, and recognize the irony.
4043:“social liberalism” (considered to be a “center-left” ideology) and fits your “bare-minimum”, obtuse narrative of anti-capitalism (simply siding with workers over corporations). 3075:
vote Democratic (85-95%). But a party can still be center-left without relying on organized labor, and instead be focused on issues such as abortion rights and environmentalism.
704: 1641:
Bigotry is very useful for lots of people, it props up their ego, there needs to be an alternative for individualist and egoist societies rather than just imposing liberalism.
4169:
It seems right-wingers think democrat sounds bad, democratic sounds good. If the use of “democrat” as the name is wrong, there should some discussion of this in the article.
4984: 4924: 201: 922: 898: 796: 792: 2414:
would be considered a very moderate or Blue Dog Democrat by today's standards, not including his record on LGBT rights. Bill Clinton supported the death penalty, enacted a
4954: 2768:
labor, and like Marxist parties it has moved to the center. In Europe however, liberal parties tend to occupy the middle ground between social democrats and conservatives.
903: 988: 970: 950: 281: 2879: 740: 4969: 2415: 927: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 1558:
That’s good academics use internationally recognised definitions, I didn’t know that. Surely that makes it easy to put something in the political spectrum parameter?
4914: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 4974: 4959: 4904: 730: 4742:
has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the
4563:
has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the
759: 694: 630: 3786:
democrats) and social liberals, rather than exclude one or both; I would group more radical democratic socialists as left-wing and closer to what was known as "
1156:
hold open primaries in 2012? Of course not. Every political party has a unique context - they are still ideological and have a place on the political spectrum.
3343: 1949: 90: 1401:
Agreed that other regions have different political spectrums with the centre being at the top of the bell curve, but there is a global one regarding ideology
1893:
Guardino, Matt; Snyder, Dean (December 2012). "The Tea Party and the Crisis of Neoliberalism: Mainstreaming New Right Populism in the Corporate News Media".
1582:
When looking at the tax cuts for billionaires alone that democrats demand, they are larger than every other party proposal except the far-right republicans.
4874: 4430:
This seems like a case of deciding what the article should say, then finding sources rather than identifying the best sources and summarizing what they say.
1922:
Indeed, the Democratic Party's longing for centrism and consensus with the right wing disables its ability to articulate a resonant message with the public.
879: 4949: 4934: 3087: 1444:
and my impression, but on the worldwide political spectrum, the democrats are centre-left to centre-right, and the republicans are right wing to far-right
340:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. 4279:
The ideology says "center-left", which is inaccurate. The Democratic Party is in total support of capitalism. They are a center to center-right ideology.
2602:
the Democratic Party's potential to win elections, despite its current slide in approval, may be at least equal to that of any center-left party in Europe
699: 4944: 3180: 869: 4854: 2349:
The Liberal Party is considered a broad church by its members, sure, but broad strictly on the right. The Democrats have factions to the left of centre
4964: 2469:. I have found additional high-quality sources that I believe should put the question of whether the Democratic Party is "Center-left" or not to rest. 372: 327: 4629: 3137: 2930: 3738:
grouping is controversial. Can anyone explain what additional information this field provides beyond what is already stated in the ideology field?
3013:
Hamby, Alonzo L. (2010). "Is There No Democratic Left in America? Reflections on the Transformation of an Ideology.". In Hargrove, Erwin C. (ed.).
1975: 489: 96: 4899: 4884: 2076:
center-left, with centrist and left-wing factions. Some of your sources are older, before the Democratic Party lost its more conservative-leaning
4979: 4412:: I'm not a registered Democrat or Republican. But being graduate student and seeing the statistics on educational polarization explain a lot. 3498: 2630: 845: 670: 625: 4864: 4399: 3467: 3027: 2993: 2941:, were obviously not a left-leaning coalition; it was reactionary and white supremacist, disenfranchising African Americans and poor Whites. 2918:(New York). See the article on Southern Democrats for their full history, while Martin Van Buren stayed loyal to the Union (he died in 1862). 2883: 2588: 1303:
All major parties in Western democracies support this. The Democrats however are less supportive than right-wing parties in other countries.
1077: 179: 3899:
Political position should be Center to Center-left and political ideology should be Social Liberalism, Third Way and Faction: Progressivism
1822: 2528:
fundamentally altered the role of corporate governance, and related issues, in the project of assembling a competitive electoral coalition.
1171: 1037:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been
146: 41: 4614:
from the 2024 election, and he will serve only one term. This itself is extremely notable, and may be worth putting in the lead instead.
3441:
Observes that the terms "progressive" and "liberal" are "often used interchangeably" in political discourse regarding "the center-left".
2562:
Observes that the terms "progressive" and "liberal" are "often used interchangeably" in political discourse regarding "the center-left".
1213: 4797: 4119: 3904: 4939: 4213: 4051: 682: 492:. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the 407: 4808:
Classifying the Democrats as only a "Center Left" party seems outdated. This is not the 1990s Bill Clinton Democratic Party anymore.
4180: 343: 331: 110: 4391:
I agree, my point is the lead of this article on the Democratic Party is written in a more favorable tone, and fails to mention the
3984: 1716: 1587: 1523:
I've seen no evidence of this, but even if it was, they aren't a center-right party, and this article isn't about a European party.
3420: 2606:
the foregoing trends have put the Democrats in a position to eventually build a dominant center-left majority in the United States.
2541: 2098: 1745:"Fact check US: Is it true that 'In a country other than the US, Joe Biden would not be in the same party as the Democratic left'?" 836: 787: 115: 31: 4050:
4). it would be better if you could actually defend your argument instead of making two different threads to push your narrative.
2526:
a widespread and fundamental reorientation of the Democratic Party toward decidedly centrist national politics over recent decades
4359: 3681: 2875: 678:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
35: 140: 85: 4869: 4803: 4006:
that support the change you want to be made. your link does not mention the Democratic party or even the words center or right
1057: 1034: 600: 1544:
even when describing U.S. politics. So for example U.S. conservatism is normally categorized as a sub-branch of liberalism.
76: 4342:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1368:
The issue with the US is that its media is incredibly insular so they make their own definitions of the political spectrum
136: 4456:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3286:
Rae, Nicol C. (June 2007). "Be Careful What You Wish For: The Rise of Responsible Parties in American National Politics".
1848:
Rae, Nicol C. (June 2007). "Be Careful What You Wish For: The Rise of Responsible Parties in American National Politics".
4303: 4003: 1053: 4713: 4644: 4530: 462: 2803: 2682: 2320: 458: 186: 4744: 4591:
I'm looking for a consensus on whether to change or remove this sentence in the lead. I support keeping the sources.
3974:
This political party is listed as center-left. It would be more accurate to claim this institution is center-right.
3453:
Cronin, James E.; Ross, George W.; Shoch, James (August 24, 2011). "Introduction: The New World of the Center-Left".
2574:
Cronin, James E.; Ross, George W.; Shoch, James (August 24, 2011). "Introduction: The New World of the Center-Left".
1340:
nomination process by running "primary elections." Can you name any other country in the world that has this system?
3454: 3329: 2690: 2575: 2328: 1935: 3538: 3494: 3379: 3368:
Bruner, Christopher M. (2018). "Center-Left Politics and Corporate Governance: What Is the 'Progressive' Agenda?".
3295: 2848: 2626: 2497: 2486:
Bruner, Christopher M. (2018). "Center-Left Politics and Corporate Governance: What Is the 'Progressive' Agenda?".
2358: 2304: 2287: 2027: 1857: 289: 196: 4476: 4258: 4085: 3953: 3878: 1698: 479: 349: 120: 4835: 4709: 4618: 4438: 4392: 4382: 4232: 4196: 3757: 3743: 3221: 2777: 2725: 1612: 1549: 1476:
They certainly are from a European perspective. Economically they are centre-right. Socially idk, I’d say centre
1345: 1308: 1279: 1146: 1097: 1081: 4791: 1045: 300: 4813: 4403: 4352: 4151: 3489: 2621: 1330: 3170: 1796: 1646: 1632: 1563: 1514: 1481: 1449: 1420: 1406: 1373: 1359: 1175: 606: 2963:"socialist" elements within the center-left Democratic Party, which I believe should satisfy TFD's concerns. 1217: 4640: 4525: 4417: 4366: 4217: 4055: 3613: 3592: 3428: 3203: 2946: 2860: 2758: 2652:
political scientists could learn much from closer examination of the rich world's largest center-left party.
2549: 2423: 2374: 2247: 2219: 1530: 1497: 1465: 1390: 1265: 152: 4284: 4172: 4029: 3014: 2980: 4773: 4600: 3770:
favouring "Centrism" (per TFD), I think the presented reliable sources are enough to support "Center-left"
3677: 3064: 2922: 2864: 2418:, deregulated the telecom and financial industries, and was lukewarm on labor unions (see my Vox source). 4824: 4809: 4191:
It's just silliness. Several years ago, they almost renamed the Democrats the Democrat Socialist Party.
1642: 1628: 1559: 1510: 1477: 1445: 1416: 1402: 1369: 1355: 1056:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
1049: 466: 66: 4684: 4503: 3811: 3719: 3656: 3554: 3460: 2874:
Because of the party's size, environmentalist and socialist positions tend to be represented by say the
2686: 2581: 2440: 2393: 2354: 2324: 2312: 2283: 2043: 1678: 1274:
What is your definition of centre-left? (And don't just say it lies somewhere between center and left.)
844:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2681:, political positions mostly takes into account the standards of the individual country (e.g. compare 81: 4280: 4025: 2117: 1415:
The position on the spectrum parameter is there to make cross country comparisons easy for the reader
4831: 4705: 4434: 4378: 4228: 4192: 4024:
The left starts at anti-capitalism. At bare minimum you have to side with workers over corporations.
3802: 3739: 3550: 3542: 3268: 3231: 3217: 2811: 2773: 2721: 2694: 2451:. According to him, the party's goals include the maintenance of a "globe-spanning military empire". 2332: 2205:
many of the college-educated voters who now make up a sizable portion of the party's base cheer ... .
2180: 2039: 2031: 1667: 1608: 1545: 1341: 1304: 1294: 1275: 1250: 1142: 1093: 662: 415: 4798:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/07/13/why-progressives-winning-inside-democratic-party/
2319:
plus political position is mostly listed from the standards of the individual country (e.g. compare
577: 337: 4753: 4574: 4565: 4499: 4433:
It's a lot easier to challenge text on the basis that it is unsourced or wrong than to argue NPOV.
4406:, where we are less able to recognize that the trend (educational polarization) affects us as well. 3689: 3545:
for 2020, the Democratic Party has a RILE score of -24.662, putting it within the range of being a
3142: 2899: 2316: 2148: 2034:
for 2020, the Democratic Party has a RILE score of -24.662, putting it within the range of being a
1980: 1902: 1326: 1202: 1194: 749: 172: 17: 2118:"Bill Clinton is still a star, but today's Democrats are dramatically more liberal than his party" 4830:
No reliable sources consider U.S. liberalism, which is committed to capitalism, to be left-wing.
4636: 4413: 4362: 4311: 4159: 4011: 3927: 3673: 3634: 3608: 3588: 3264: 3199: 3175: 3078:
The party is instead comprised of well-educated White voters and racial minorities, particularly
2942: 2907: 2844: 2819: 2798:"the only major that does not have Marxist roots" The Democratic Party was founded in 1828, when 2754: 2456: 2419: 2397: 2389: 2369: 2242: 2215: 2077: 1525: 1492: 1460: 1385: 1261: 1161: 1131: 1112: 305: 3836:"Polarized by Degrees: How the Diploma Divide and the Culture War Transformed American Politics" 3108:"Polarized by Degrees: How the Diploma Divide and the Culture War Transformed American Politics" 2937:
in the 1930s. Southern Democrats, which for nearly a century (1877 to 1964) became known as the
2750: 2698: 2443:. Levitz describes the party as centrist (not center-left), but also implicitly describes it as 2336: 646: 619: 4839: 4817: 4777: 4757: 4662: 4578: 4535: 4507: 4442: 4421: 4386: 4370: 4315: 4288: 4236: 4221: 4200: 4184: 4163: 4145: 4123: 4059: 4033: 4015: 3988: 3931: 3908: 3815: 3747: 3723: 3693: 3660: 3638: 3619: 3606:- I went ahead and added center-left as there's very clearly an overwhelming consensus for it. 3596: 3578: 3244: 3225: 3207: 3053: 2950: 2887: 2838: 2823: 2781: 2762: 2744: 2729: 2706: 2671: 2460: 2427: 2380: 2362: 2344: 2291: 2253: 2223: 2067: 1650: 1636: 1616: 1591: 1567: 1553: 1536: 1518: 1503: 1485: 1471: 1453: 1424: 1410: 1396: 1377: 1363: 1349: 1334: 1312: 1298: 1283: 1269: 1254: 1221: 1206: 1179: 1165: 1150: 1135: 1116: 1101: 1085: 974:, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to 4769: 4658: 4360:
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/08/14/the-presidential-matchup-harris-trump-kennedy/
3574: 3510: 3464: 3401: 3398: 3391: 3307: 3240: 3079: 3072: 3049: 3024: 2990: 2926: 2868: 2834: 2740: 2667: 2642: 2585: 2519: 2516: 2509: 2189: 2063: 1914: 1869: 403: 62: 4704:
The statement isn't supported by sources, is an extraordinary claim and happens to be false.
3303: 2396:
faction has steadily declined in the 21st century, as Democrats lost power in the South. The
1865: 418:. You are free to contribute to such discussions if you have sources for something different. 388:
Q1: Why is the Democratic Party's ideology labelled on the political spectrum in the infobox?
4804:
https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/both-white-and-nonwhite-democrats-are-moving-left/
4738: 4720: 3807: 3787: 3715: 3652: 3502: 3432: 3383: 3299: 3020: 2986: 2915: 2859:. If you want to compare the Democratic Party internationally, consider comparing it to the 2634: 2553: 2501: 2179: 1906: 1861: 1721: 982: 441: 411: 304: 302: 4724: 4584: 4545: 3977: 3557:, but the database has noted a relatively recent shift to the left in the party's politics. 3436: 2557: 2046:, but the database has noted a relatively recent shift to the left in the party's politics. 888: 432: 3083: 2852: 2702: 2340: 1599:
The Age of Ideology: Political Ideologies from the American Revolution to Postmodern Times
1290: 1246: 828: 4521: 1441: 1185:
anyone supportive of the constitutional status quo as opposed to the radical right (says
4749: 4570: 4559: 4541: 3685: 3370: 3334: 2911: 2488: 2401: 2400:
has just 10 members (it peaked at 54 in 2009) and moved left in recent years, Senators
1940: 1198: 1190: 2080:
in the 2010s, except for African Americans and some urban areas in the South. Sources:
962: 944: 822: 812: 781: 4848: 4307: 4155: 4007: 3923: 3791: 3630: 3339: 2815: 2452: 2236:
opinionated one presenting the Republicans as a fascist party. It's not reliable for
1945: 1157: 1127: 1108: 675: 1026: 4654: 3570: 3236: 3045: 2830: 2736: 2678: 2663: 2444: 2411: 2059: 1627:
managing change rather than opposing it. Trump is a regressive, not a conservative
1186: 1769: 2439:
and center-left, attributing this direction of the party to the influence of the
1910: 4227:
That's too much detail for the info-box and belongs in the body of the article.
4139: 3060: 2938: 2448: 2405: 2279: 4322:
NPOV; the "diploma divide" affects us as editors--do you have a college degree?
3506: 3068: 2638: 818: 652: 4792:
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/have-democrats-become-a-party-of-the-left/
3513: 3394: 3310: 2645: 2512: 2192: 1917: 1872: 986:
and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit
4596: 3456:
What's Left of the Left: Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times
3090:
is highly correlated with income and wealth. I have three sources for this.
2799: 2717:
What's Left of the Left: Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times
2577:
What's Left of the Left: Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times
2270:
on the left on the international scale. The only compromise I'd consider is
1490:
Not even from a European perspective, but why is Europe even relevant here?
4787:
I suggest adding "Left" to the political position of the Democratic Party.
674:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 457:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 352:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
4622: 3922:
Discussions are ongoing literally right above this request. Join them. –
3546: 3387: 3356:
Moderation may be relative, but moderates still run the Democratic Party.
2934: 2807: 2505: 2308: 2300: 2275: 2271: 2262: 2035: 1962:
Moderation may be relative, but moderates still run the Democratic Party.
1663: 1623: 976: 841: 399: 395: 4802:
Center for Politics: Both White and Nonwhite Democrats are Moving Left
3801:
As an addendum, I think that I believe must be discussed in regards to
3798:
support "Center-left" as an accurate grouping for the Democratic Party.
4890:
Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
4796:
Washington Post: Biden’s Democratic Party is to the left of Obama’s.
3063:
like the UK Labor Party or Germany's SPD. Part of the reason is the
2144:"Blue Dog Democrats, whittled down in number, are trying to regroup" 912: 4790:
Brookings Institution: Have Democrats become a party of the left?
3764:
any "to" wording usage, which is ambiguous, as I outlined above.
3171:"The 'Diploma Divide' Is the New Fault Line in American Politics" 3067:, which is heavily racially polarized--White evangelicals in the 2000:
the actually existing Democratic Party is a centrist organization
1976:"America Already Has a Centrist Party. It's Called the Democrats" 367: 3553:
party. Historically, it has classified the party as centrist or
2042:
party. Historically, it has classified the party as centrist or
3629:
center left as the sole position. These sources are excellent.
2802:
was 10-years-old. Both the Democratic Party and the preceeding
4464: 4355:
trend between education and support for the Democratic Party.
4246: 4073: 3941: 3866: 3852:
universities, non-profit organizations, and even corporations.
3124:
universities, non-profit organizations, and even corporations.
2902:, and before the Civil Rights movement, was a combination of 1021: 571: 427: 414:. A consensus was reached that the Democratic Party is mainly 394:
The consensus among editors is that the Democratic Party is a
357: 314: 306: 26: 4880:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Society and social sciences
2598:
the Democrats may have become center-left before anyone else
2099:"Why The Democrats Have Shifted Left Over The Last 30 Years" 911: 887: 748: 398:
party, encompassing ideologies including but not limited to
3706:
also been described the other way and the scholarly debate.
3016:
The Future of the Democratic Left in Industrial Democracies
2982:
The Future of the Democratic Left in Industrial Democracies
4047:
necessarily make them “center-right” in political science.
2772:
parties and, in the United States, the Democratic Party."
2261:, as has been said before, the party is way too much of a 1044:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
1770:"The US Presidential Election 2020: Last Lap Reflections" 4137:
Incorrect, the party is called the Democratic Party. —
3978:
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746.amp
2367:
The Democrats do not have any right of center factions.
3773: 2604:... Despite the setback in the 2010 midterms, together 2303:
parties that has political position listed for example
541: 522: 378: 4332:
Start a new thread for the lead on Biden's presidency.
3138:"How the Diploma Divide Is Remaking American Politics" 171: 4895:
B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
4599:'s presidency, the party has adopted an increasingly 2810:
parties which represented the American variations of
998:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Elections and Referendums
4106:“Please change Democratic Party to Democrat Party”. 1823:"The Democrats Are Now America's Conservative Party" 1458:
The Democratic Party is not, in fact, center-right.
840:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 3760:but that a footnote can address), with a footnote. 185: 4860:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use American English 1717:"United House Democrats Return to Squabbling Ways" 4524:that support the changes you want to be made. — 2353:right of centre. Hence my "big tent" suggestion. 4910:B-Class United States articles of Top-importance 2979:Hargrove, Erwin C., ed. (2010). "Introduction". 1141:elections run by government is fairly uncommon. 44:for general discussion of the article's subject. 4930:United States History articles with to-do lists 2335:even though the latter is more conservative). 2178:Zengerle, Jason; Metz, Justin (June 29, 2022). 4990:WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles 2697:even though the latter is more conservative). 1597:See for example,"Liberalism and Modernity" in 1001:Template:WikiProject Elections and Referendums 4920:Top-importance United States History articles 4461:Semi-protected edit request on 15 August 2024 4306:that support the change you want to be made. 2871:because those nations have two major parties. 8: 4783:Political position: "Center Left" and "Left" 4243:Semi-protected edit request on 8 August 2024 4070:Semi-protected edit request on 16 July 2024 3863:Semi-protected edit request on 28 June 2024 3088:educational attainment in the United States 3059:I agree that the Democratic Party is not a 4985:B-Class Elections and Referendums articles 4925:WikiProject United States History articles 4170: 3938:Semi-protected edit request on 4 July 2024 3001:right in the United States than in Europe. 2921:Northern Democrats became pro-labor after 2408:became independents and won't run in 2024. 939: 776: 614: 501: 474: 445:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 4955:Top-importance American politics articles 3425:The Oxford Companion to American Politics 2546:The Oxford Companion to American Politics 715:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States 4398:Also the sheer number of discussions on 3304:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.071105.100750 2847:, while the English-speaking world uses 1879:a generally liberal or center-left party 1866:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.071105.100750 1657:Center to center-left versus center-left 4970:Top-importance political party articles 4685:"Biden Ends 2023 With 39% Job Approval" 4675: 4116:2600:1006:B115:E801:51DE:FFA4:C67A:6D1B 3901:2600:1700:DB70:3750:64C4:DD0C:49A7:E7D3 3826: 3530: 3278: 3230:TFD, the very Knowledge (XXG) page for 3098: 2971: 2478: 2089: 2019: 1797:"The Six Wings Of The Democratic Party" 1689: 941: 778: 616: 575: 4915:B-Class United States History articles 4875:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles 4625:increasingly economically progressive. 4583: 3499:American Political Science Association 3330:"Are We Entering a New Political Era?" 3071:vote nearly as Republican (80-90%) as 2910:and Northern Democrats, symbolized by 2631:American Political Science Association 1988:from the original on February 24, 2024 1936:"Are We Entering a New Political Era?" 4975:Political parties task force articles 4960:American politics task force articles 4905:Top-importance United States articles 4400:Talk:Republican Party (United States) 4177:2601:645:4300:EE90:CDF3:43A:6271:51B9 3150:from the original on October 20, 2022 971:WikiProject Elections and Referendums 465:, this should not be changed without 7: 4855:Knowledge (XXG) controversial topics 4338:The following discussion is closed. 3981:2603:8000:A301:1A0:510:AAFF:ABF:843B 3437:10.1093/acref/9780199764310.001.0001 2558:10.1093/acref/9780199764310.001.0001 1584:2603:8000:A301:1A0:510:AAFF:ABF:843B 968:This article is within the scope of 854:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics 834:This article is within the scope of 668:This article is within the scope of 4683:Brenan, Megan (December 22, 2023). 3834:Grossmann, Matt; Hopkins, David A. 3346:from the original on April 19, 2024 3183:from the original on April 24, 2023 3106:Grossmann, Matt; Hopkins, David A. 3019:. Issues in Policy History Series. 2985:. Issues in Policy History Series. 2116:Yglesias, Matthew (July 26, 2016). 1952:from the original on April 19, 2024 605:It is of interest to the following 34:for discussing improvements to the 18:Talk:United States Democratic Party 4950:B-Class American politics articles 4935:WikiProject United States articles 4617:The sentence fails to mention the 3651:(see sources and comments above). 3288:Annual Review of Political Science 2097:Sach, Maddie (December 16, 2019). 1850:Annual Review of Political Science 1004:Elections and Referendums articles 718:Template:WikiProject United States 25: 4945:High-importance politics articles 4587:on Biden's presidency in the lead 3136:Levitz, Eric (October 19, 2022). 2181:"The Vanishing Moderate Democrat" 1984:. New York City: New York Media. 1974:Levitz, Eric (October 18, 2018). 565:Former featured article candidate 61:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 4965:B-Class political party articles 4730: 4551: 4512: 4468: 4452:The discussion above is closed. 4294: 4250: 4129: 4077: 3994: 3945: 3914: 3870: 3682:Congressional Progressive Caucus 3328:Marantz, Andrew (May 24, 2021). 2876:Congressional Progressive Caucus 1934:Marantz, Andrew (May 24, 2021). 1622:I would agree if it weren't for 1025: 961: 943: 821: 811: 780: 655: 645: 618: 585: 576: 486:Democratic Party (United States) 478: 431: 366: 318: 288: 56:Click here to start a new topic. 36:Democratic Party (United States) 3169:Sosnik, Doug (April 17, 2023). 2156:from the original on 2014-01-16 1697:Hood, John (December 6, 2006). 874:This article has been rated as 735:This article has been rated as 342:Content must be written from a 326:The subject of this article is 4900:B-Class United States articles 4885:B-Class level-5 vital articles 4840:20:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 4818:16:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 4763:Final Reference to Consolidate 1699:"Meet the New House Centrists" 1677:as it is a reliable source as 1: 4980:WikiProject Politics articles 4207:thoughts on ideology/position 2878:, not individual coalitions. 2524:This article has argued that 2311:conservative party listed as 2240:other than Levitz's opinion. 1102:23:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC) 1086:22:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC) 1058:contentious topics procedures 920:This article is supported by 896:This article is supported by 857:Template:WikiProject Politics 848:and see a list of open tasks. 757:This article is supported by 53:Put new text under old text. 4865:Old requests for peer review 3086:among White voters, because 2465:I am changing my support to 1911:10.1080/07393148.2012.729741 1197:) 05:53, 19 July 2024 (UTC) 923:Political parties task force 899:American politics task force 4778:19:09, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 4758:01:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 4714:18:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC) 4663:17:03, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 4645:16:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 4601:progressive economic agenda 4579:03:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 4536:21:31, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 4508:16:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 4491:to reactivate your request. 4479:has been answered. Set the 4443:23:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC) 4422:19:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC) 4387:02:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 4371:00:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 4273:to reactivate your request. 4261:has been answered. Set the 4237:02:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 4201:02:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 4185:18:24, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 4152:that's a pejorative epithet 4100:to reactivate your request. 4088:has been answered. Set the 3968:to reactivate your request. 3956:has been answered. Set the 3893:to reactivate your request. 3881:has been answered. Set the 3419:Coates, David, ed. (2012). 2933:, and continued with FDR's 2894:The Democratic party began 2880:2610:20:6B73:240:0:0:0:B096 2804:Democratic-Republican Party 2683:Conservative Party (Norway) 2540:Coates, David, ed. (2012). 2321:Conservative Party (Norway) 1222:03:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 336:When updating the article, 5006: 4630:2024 presidential election 4316:02:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 4289:01:14, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 4222:15:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 4060:05:18, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 4034:01:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 3840:Cambridge University Press 3539:Manifesto Project Database 3495:Cambridge University Press 3112:Cambridge University Press 2931:1896 presidential election 2849:first past the post voting 2627:Cambridge University Press 2305:Liberal Party of Australia 2028:Manifesto Project Database 1675:The New York Intelligencer 1670:" or just "center-left." 1046:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 880:project's importance scale 741:project's importance scale 549:Featured article candidate 490:featured article candidate 383:Frequently asked questions 4940:B-Class politics articles 4619:2021-2023 inflation surge 4393:2021-2023 inflation surge 4164:15:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC) 4146:15:15, 16 July 2024 (UTC) 4124:15:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC) 3932:20:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC) 3909:20:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC) 3816:17:23, 16 July 2024 (UTC) 3758:Talk:Centre-left politics 3748:17:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC) 3724:16:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC) 3694:13:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC) 3661:03:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC) 3639:03:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC) 3620:17:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC) 3597:17:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC) 3579:20:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC) 3507:10.1017/S1537592723002931 3421:"Liberalism, Center-left" 3245:20:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC) 3226:19:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC) 3208:17:58, 22 June 2024 (UTC) 3054:03:59, 22 June 2024 (UTC) 2951:21:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 2888:21:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 2839:13:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 2824:02:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 2782:02:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 2763:00:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 2745:21:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 2730:16:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 2707:13:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC) 2691:Republican People's Party 2672:00:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC) 2639:10.1017/S1537592723002931 2542:"Liberalism, Center-left" 2461:14:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 2428:14:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC) 2381:14:34, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 2363:13:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 2345:13:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 2329:Republican People's Party 2292:12:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 2254:03:02, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 2224:02:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 2142:Kane, Paul (2014-01-15). 2068:01:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1881:and a conservative party. 1260:I concur with the above. 1207:05:53, 19 July 2024 (UTC) 1180:07:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 1060:before editing this page. 995:Elections and Referendums 956: 951:Elections and Referendums 919: 895: 873: 806: 756: 734: 671:WikiProject United States 640: 613: 562: 504: 500: 338:be bold, but not reckless 91:Be welcoming to newcomers 4454:Please do not modify it. 4404:actor-observer asymmetry 4353:monotonically increasing 4340:Please do not modify it. 4016:19:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 3989:17:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 3672:" to encompass both the 3490:Perspectives on Politics 2622:Perspectives on Politics 1651:16:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC) 1637:16:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC) 1617:16:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC) 1592:17:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 1166:17:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) 1151:16:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC) 1136:16:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC) 1117:16:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC) 1054:normal editorial process 760:WikiProject U.S. history 676:United States of America 3678:New Democrat Coalitions 3429:Oxford University Press 2550:Oxford University Press 1568:19:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC) 1554:17:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC) 1537:17:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC) 1519:15:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC) 1504:14:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC) 1486:14:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC) 1472:14:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC) 1454:12:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC) 1425:14:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC) 1411:14:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC) 1397:13:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC) 1378:13:40, 6 May 2024 (UTC) 1364:13:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC) 1350:13:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC) 1335:23:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC) 1313:13:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC) 1299:11:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC) 1284:02:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) 1270:02:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC) 1255:10:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC) 1041:as a contentious topic. 4870:B-Class vital articles 3338:. New York, New York: 3143:New York Intelligencer 3065:Southern United States 2923:William Jennings Bryan 2865:Australian Labor Party 2843:Most of Europe uses a 1981:New York Intelligencer 1944:. New York, New York: 1050:standards of behaviour 916: 892: 753: 721:United States articles 330:and content may be in 86:avoid personal attacks 3772:. I also support the 3461:Duke University Press 3082:. It could be called 2582:Duke University Press 2441:civil rights movement 2394:conservative Democrat 1895:New Political Science 1774:The Political Compass 915: 891: 752: 599:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 592:level-5 vital article 344:neutral point of view 282:Auto-archiving period 111:Neutral point of view 3803:Center-left politics 3388:10.2139/ssrn.2917253 3232:center-left politics 2812:classical radicalism 2506:10.2139/ssrn.2917253 1903:Taylor & Francis 837:WikiProject Politics 663:United States portal 463:relevant style guide 459:varieties of English 116:No original research 4150:More to the point, 3670:center to left wing 3472:. pp. 17, 22, 182: 2900:Communist Manifesto 2593:. pp. 17, 22, 182: 2149:The Washington Post 2103:fivethirtyeight.com 689:Articles Requested! 461:. According to the 4527:BerryForPerpetuity 4341: 3265:Political position 3176:The New York Times 2943:User:JohnAdams1800 2908:Southern Democrats 2845:multi-party system 2416:welfare reform law 2398:Blue Dog Coalition 2186:The New York Times 1743:Kesselman, Donna. 1240:Political position 1071:Political position 1035:contentious topics 917: 893: 754: 601:content assessment 523:September 27, 2005 505:Article milestones 97:dispute resolution 58: 4495: 4494: 4339: 4277: 4276: 4187: 4175:comment added by 4104: 4103: 3972: 3971: 3897: 3896: 3537:According to the 3497:on behalf of the 3469:978-0-8223-5079-8 3080:African Americans 3073:African Americans 3029:978-0-271-02356-4 2995:978-0-271-02356-4 2927:Bourbon Democrats 2869:Labour Party (UK) 2629:on behalf of the 2590:978-0-8223-5079-8 2274:(perhaps listing 2026:According to the 1801:Five Thirty Eight 1065: 1064: 1020: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1012: 1011: 938: 937: 934: 933: 860:politics articles 797:Political parties 775: 774: 771: 770: 570: 569: 558: 557: 473: 472: 426: 425: 404:social liberalism 381: 356: 355: 313: 312: 77:Assume good faith 54: 16:(Redirected from 4997: 4739:Martin Van Buren 4734: 4733: 4721:Martin Van Buren 4693: 4692: 4680: 4555: 4554: 4533: 4528: 4522:reliable sources 4516: 4515: 4486: 4482: 4472: 4471: 4465: 4304:reliable sources 4298: 4297: 4268: 4264: 4254: 4253: 4247: 4133: 4132: 4095: 4091: 4081: 4080: 4074: 4004:reliable sources 3998: 3997: 3963: 3959: 3949: 3948: 3942: 3918: 3917: 3888: 3884: 3874: 3873: 3867: 3855: 3854: 3848: 3846: 3831: 3788:Marxist centrism 3774:current footnote 3564: 3558: 3535: 3522: 3521: 3484: 3478: 3477: 3450: 3444: 3443: 3416: 3410: 3409: 3365: 3359: 3358: 3353: 3351: 3325: 3319: 3318: 3283: 3255:Current proposal 3193: 3192: 3190: 3188: 3166: 3160: 3159: 3157: 3155: 3133: 3127: 3126: 3120: 3118: 3103: 3038: 3037: 3021:Penn State Press 3010: 3004: 3003: 2987:Penn State Press 2976: 2916:Martin Van Buren 2914:(Tennessee) and 2656: 2655: 2616: 2610: 2609: 2571: 2565: 2564: 2537: 2531: 2530: 2483: 2355:GlowstoneUnknown 2307:is considered a 2297:Strongly Support 2284:GlowstoneUnknown 2208: 2207: 2201: 2199: 2183: 2175: 2169: 2168: 2162: 2161: 2139: 2133: 2132: 2130: 2128: 2113: 2107: 2106: 2094: 2078:Southern faction 2053: 2047: 2024: 2006: 2005: 1995: 1993: 1971: 1965: 1964: 1959: 1957: 1931: 1925: 1924: 1890: 1884: 1883: 1845: 1839: 1838: 1836: 1834: 1818: 1812: 1811: 1809: 1807: 1792: 1786: 1785: 1783: 1781: 1766: 1760: 1759: 1757: 1755: 1749:The Conversation 1740: 1734: 1733: 1731: 1729: 1722:National Journal 1713: 1707: 1706: 1694: 1029: 1022: 1006: 1005: 1002: 999: 996: 989:our project page 983:electoral reform 965: 958: 957: 947: 940: 862: 861: 858: 855: 852: 831: 826: 825: 815: 808: 807: 802: 799: 784: 777: 723: 722: 719: 716: 713: 665: 660: 659: 658: 649: 642: 641: 636: 633: 622: 615: 598: 589: 588: 581: 580: 572: 563:Current status: 544: 542:October 14, 2005 525: 502: 482: 475: 442:American English 438:This article is 435: 428: 412:social democracy 371: 370: 358: 322: 321: 315: 307: 293: 292: 283: 190: 189: 175: 106:Article policies 27: 21: 5005: 5004: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4845: 4844: 4785: 4765: 4745:discussion page 4735: 4731: 4728: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4682: 4681: 4677: 4589: 4566:discussion page 4556: 4552: 4549: 4531: 4526: 4520:Please provide 4513: 4484: 4480: 4469: 4463: 4458: 4457: 4344: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4329: 4324: 4302:please provide 4295: 4266: 4262: 4251: 4245: 4209: 4130: 4093: 4089: 4078: 4072: 4002:please provide 3995: 3961: 3957: 3946: 3940: 3915: 3886: 3882: 3871: 3865: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3844: 3842: 3833: 3832: 3828: 3568: 3567: 3561: 3536: 3532: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3486: 3485: 3481: 3470: 3452: 3451: 3447: 3418: 3417: 3413: 3380:Digital Commons 3367: 3366: 3362: 3349: 3347: 3327: 3326: 3322: 3285: 3284: 3280: 3257: 3197: 3196: 3186: 3184: 3168: 3167: 3163: 3153: 3151: 3135: 3134: 3130: 3116: 3114: 3105: 3104: 3100: 3084:postmaterialist 3043: 3042: 3041: 3030: 3012: 3011: 3007: 2996: 2978: 2977: 2973: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2618: 2617: 2613: 2591: 2573: 2572: 2568: 2539: 2538: 2534: 2498:Digital Commons 2485: 2484: 2480: 2299:, as there are 2259:Strongly oppose 2213: 2212: 2211: 2197: 2195: 2177: 2176: 2172: 2159: 2157: 2141: 2140: 2136: 2126: 2124: 2115: 2114: 2110: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2057: 2056: 2050: 2025: 2021: 2011: 2010: 2009: 1991: 1989: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1955: 1953: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1892: 1891: 1887: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1832: 1830: 1821:Graham, David. 1820: 1819: 1815: 1805: 1803: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1779: 1777: 1776:. Pace News Ltd 1768: 1767: 1763: 1753: 1751: 1742: 1741: 1737: 1727: 1725: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1703:National Review 1696: 1695: 1691: 1659: 1242: 1078:150.108.240.134 1073: 1048:, any expected 1003: 1000: 997: 994: 993: 876:High-importance 859: 856: 853: 850: 849: 829:Politics portal 827: 820: 801:High‑importance 800: 790: 720: 717: 714: 711: 710: 709: 695:Become a Member 661: 656: 654: 634: 628: 596: 586: 540: 521: 467:broad consensus 422: 421: 420: 419: 389: 384: 382: 319: 309: 308: 303: 280: 132: 127: 126: 125: 102: 72: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 5003: 5001: 4993: 4992: 4987: 4982: 4977: 4972: 4967: 4962: 4957: 4952: 4947: 4942: 4937: 4932: 4927: 4922: 4917: 4912: 4907: 4902: 4897: 4892: 4887: 4882: 4877: 4872: 4867: 4862: 4857: 4847: 4846: 4843: 4842: 4828: 4810:MoldciusMenbug 4784: 4781: 4764: 4761: 4729: 4727: 4718: 4717: 4716: 4695: 4694: 4674: 4673: 4669: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4634: 4633: 4626: 4615: 4612:Biden withdrew 4605: 4604: 4588: 4582: 4560:Woodrow Wilson 4550: 4548: 4542:Woodrow Wilson 4539: 4493: 4492: 4473: 4462: 4459: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4431: 4428: 4407: 4396: 4345: 4336: 4331: 4330: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4323: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4275: 4274: 4255: 4244: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4208: 4205: 4204: 4203: 4167: 4166: 4148: 4109: 4102: 4101: 4082: 4071: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4048: 4044: 4040: 4022: 3970: 3969: 3950: 3939: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3895: 3894: 3875: 3864: 3861: 3857: 3856: 3825: 3824: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3799: 3783: 3777: 3750: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3707: 3644: 3642: 3641: 3623: 3622: 3600: 3599: 3566: 3565: 3559: 3529: 3528: 3524: 3523: 3479: 3468: 3445: 3411: 3371:BYU Law Review 3360: 3335:The New Yorker 3320: 3296:Annual Reviews 3277: 3276: 3272: 3256: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3195: 3194: 3161: 3128: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3091: 3076: 3040: 3039: 3028: 3005: 2994: 2970: 2969: 2965: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2919: 2912:Andrew Jackson 2904:two coalitions 2892: 2891: 2890: 2872: 2853:Duverger's law 2826: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2769: 2747: 2710: 2709: 2693:classified as 2658: 2657: 2611: 2589: 2566: 2532: 2489:BYU Law Review 2477: 2476: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2463: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2409: 2402:Kyrsten Sinema 2383: 2331:classified as 2256: 2210: 2209: 2170: 2134: 2108: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2055: 2054: 2048: 2018: 2017: 2008: 2007: 1966: 1941:The New Yorker 1926: 1885: 1858:Annual Reviews 1840: 1829:. The Atlantic 1813: 1795:Bacon, Perry. 1787: 1761: 1735: 1708: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1658: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1643:Alexanderkowal 1639: 1629:Alexanderkowal 1595: 1594: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1560:Alexanderkowal 1541: 1540: 1539: 1511:Alexanderkowal 1478:Alexanderkowal 1446:Alexanderkowal 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1417:Alexanderkowal 1413: 1403:Alexanderkowal 1370:Alexanderkowal 1366: 1356:Alexanderkowal 1327:AwesomeSaucer9 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1272: 1241: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1209: 1172:101.119.138.41 1123: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1030: 1018: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1007: 966: 954: 953: 948: 936: 935: 932: 931: 928:Top-importance 918: 908: 907: 904:Top-importance 894: 884: 883: 872: 866: 865: 863: 846:the discussion 833: 832: 816: 804: 803: 785: 773: 772: 769: 768: 765:Top-importance 755: 745: 744: 737:Top-importance 733: 727: 726: 724: 708: 707: 702: 697: 692: 685: 683:Template Usage 679: 667: 666: 650: 638: 637: 635:Top‑importance 623: 611: 610: 604: 582: 568: 567: 560: 559: 556: 555: 552: 545: 537: 536: 533: 526: 518: 517: 514: 511: 507: 506: 498: 497: 483: 471: 470: 436: 424: 423: 390: 387: 386: 385: 365: 364: 363: 361: 354: 353: 323: 311: 310: 301: 299: 298: 295: 294: 192: 191: 129: 128: 124: 123: 118: 113: 104: 103: 101: 100: 93: 88: 79: 73: 71: 70: 59: 50: 49: 46: 45: 39: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5002: 4991: 4988: 4986: 4983: 4981: 4978: 4976: 4973: 4971: 4968: 4966: 4963: 4961: 4958: 4956: 4953: 4951: 4948: 4946: 4943: 4941: 4938: 4936: 4933: 4931: 4928: 4926: 4923: 4921: 4918: 4916: 4913: 4911: 4908: 4906: 4903: 4901: 4898: 4896: 4893: 4891: 4888: 4886: 4883: 4881: 4878: 4876: 4873: 4871: 4868: 4866: 4863: 4861: 4858: 4856: 4853: 4852: 4850: 4841: 4837: 4833: 4829: 4826: 4822: 4821: 4820: 4819: 4815: 4811: 4806: 4805: 4800: 4799: 4794: 4793: 4788: 4782: 4780: 4779: 4775: 4771: 4762: 4760: 4759: 4755: 4751: 4748:. Thank you. 4747: 4746: 4741: 4740: 4726: 4722: 4719: 4715: 4711: 4707: 4703: 4700: 4699: 4690: 4686: 4679: 4676: 4672: 4664: 4660: 4656: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4642: 4638: 4637:JohnAdams1800 4631: 4627: 4624: 4623:ideologically 4620: 4616: 4613: 4610: 4609: 4608: 4602: 4598: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4586: 4581: 4580: 4576: 4572: 4569:. Thank you. 4568: 4567: 4562: 4561: 4547: 4543: 4540: 4538: 4537: 4534: 4529: 4523: 4519: 4510: 4509: 4505: 4501: 4490: 4487:parameter to 4478: 4474: 4467: 4466: 4460: 4455: 4444: 4440: 4436: 4432: 4429: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4419: 4415: 4414:JohnAdams1800 4411: 4408: 4405: 4401: 4397: 4394: 4390: 4389: 4388: 4384: 4380: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4368: 4364: 4363:JohnAdams1800 4361: 4356: 4354: 4348: 4343: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4301: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4286: 4282: 4272: 4269:parameter to 4260: 4256: 4249: 4248: 4242: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4219: 4215: 4206: 4202: 4198: 4194: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4186: 4182: 4178: 4174: 4165: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4149: 4147: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4136: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4111: 4107: 4099: 4096:parameter to 4087: 4083: 4076: 4075: 4069: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4023: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4001: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3979: 3975: 3967: 3964:parameter to 3955: 3951: 3944: 3943: 3937: 3933: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3892: 3889:parameter to 3880: 3876: 3869: 3868: 3862: 3853: 3841: 3837: 3830: 3827: 3823: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3804: 3800: 3797: 3793: 3792:Herbert Croly 3789: 3784: 3781: 3778: 3775: 3771: 3769: 3763: 3759: 3754: 3751: 3749: 3745: 3741: 3736: 3733: 3732: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3708: 3704: 3700: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3628: 3625: 3624: 3621: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3612: 3611: 3605: 3602: 3601: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3589:JohnAdams1800 3586: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3563: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3534: 3531: 3520: 3515: 3512: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3491: 3483: 3480: 3476: 3471: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3457: 3449: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3431:. pp. 68–69. 3430: 3426: 3422: 3415: 3412: 3408: 3403: 3400: 3396: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3373: 3372: 3364: 3361: 3357: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3336: 3331: 3324: 3321: 3317: 3312: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3282: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3270: 3267: 3266: 3261: 3254: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3233: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3200:JohnAdams1800 3182: 3178: 3177: 3172: 3165: 3162: 3149: 3145: 3144: 3139: 3132: 3129: 3125: 3113: 3109: 3102: 3099: 3095: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3036: 3031: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3017: 3009: 3006: 3002: 2997: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2983: 2975: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2861:Liberal Party 2858: 2855:incentivizes 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2827: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2770: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2755:JohnAdams1800 2752: 2748: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2718: 2715: 2712: 2711: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2654: 2653: 2647: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2623: 2615: 2612: 2608: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2592: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2578: 2570: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2552:. pp. 68–69. 2551: 2547: 2543: 2536: 2533: 2529: 2527: 2521: 2518: 2514: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2490: 2482: 2479: 2475: 2468: 2464: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2437: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2420:JohnAdams1800 2417: 2413: 2410: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2390:Toa Nidhiki05 2387: 2384: 2382: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2373: 2372: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2264: 2260: 2257: 2255: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2246: 2245: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2216:JohnAdams1800 2206: 2194: 2191: 2187: 2182: 2174: 2171: 2167: 2155: 2151: 2150: 2145: 2138: 2135: 2123: 2119: 2112: 2109: 2104: 2100: 2093: 2090: 2086: 2079: 2075: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2052: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2023: 2020: 2016: 2015: 2004: 2001: 1998:But for now, 1987: 1983: 1982: 1977: 1970: 1967: 1963: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1942: 1937: 1930: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1889: 1886: 1882: 1880: 1874: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1844: 1841: 1828: 1824: 1817: 1814: 1802: 1798: 1791: 1788: 1775: 1771: 1765: 1762: 1750: 1746: 1739: 1736: 1724: 1723: 1718: 1712: 1709: 1704: 1700: 1693: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1680: 1679:per wikipedia 1676: 1671: 1669: 1665: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1600: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1542: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1528: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1496: 1495: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1464: 1463: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1436: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1323: 1320: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1262:Aficionado538 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1239: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1214:184.145.1.225 1210: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1070: 1068: 1061: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1042: 1040: 1036: 1031: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1008: 991: 990: 985: 984: 979: 978: 973: 972: 967: 964: 960: 959: 955: 952: 949: 946: 942: 929: 926:(assessed as 925: 924: 914: 910: 909: 905: 902:(assessed as 901: 900: 890: 886: 885: 881: 877: 871: 868: 867: 864: 847: 843: 839: 838: 830: 824: 819: 817: 814: 810: 809: 805: 798: 794: 789: 786: 783: 779: 766: 763:(assessed as 762: 761: 751: 747: 746: 742: 738: 732: 729: 728: 725: 712:United States 706: 703: 701: 698: 696: 693: 691: 690: 686: 684: 681: 680: 677: 673: 672: 664: 653: 651: 648: 644: 643: 639: 632: 627: 626:United States 624: 621: 617: 612: 608: 602: 594: 593: 583: 579: 574: 573: 566: 561: 553: 551: 550: 546: 543: 539: 538: 534: 532: 531: 527: 524: 520: 519: 515: 512: 509: 508: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 484: 481: 477: 476: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 444: 443: 437: 434: 430: 429: 417: 413: 409: 408:progressivism 405: 401: 397: 393: 380: 377: 374: 369: 362: 360: 359: 351: 347: 345: 339: 335: 333: 329: 328:controversial 324: 317: 316: 297: 296: 291: 287: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 200: 198: 194: 193: 188: 184: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 138: 135: 134:Find sources: 131: 130: 122: 121:Verifiability 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 108: 107: 98: 94: 92: 89: 87: 83: 80: 78: 75: 74: 68: 64: 63:Learn to edit 60: 57: 52: 51: 48: 47: 43: 37: 33: 29: 28: 19: 4807: 4801: 4795: 4789: 4786: 4770:Ztormtrooper 4766: 4743: 4737: 4736: 4701: 4688: 4678: 4670: 4635: 4606: 4590: 4564: 4558: 4557: 4517: 4511: 4496: 4488: 4477:edit request 4453: 4409: 4357: 4349: 4346: 4337: 4299: 4278: 4270: 4259:edit request 4214:71.254.80.96 4210: 4171:— Preceding 4168: 4140: 4138: 4134: 4112: 4108: 4105: 4097: 4086:edit request 4052:71.254.80.96 3999: 3976: 3973: 3965: 3954:edit request 3919: 3898: 3890: 3879:edit request 3850: 3843:. Retrieved 3839: 3829: 3821: 3795: 3779: 3767: 3765: 3761: 3752: 3734: 3711: 3702: 3698: 3669: 3666:Mixed oppose 3665: 3648: 3643: 3626: 3614: 3609: 3607: 3603: 3584: 3569: 3562: 3555:center-right 3533: 3517: 3488: 3482: 3473: 3455: 3448: 3440: 3424: 3414: 3405: 3375: 3369: 3363: 3355: 3348:. Retrieved 3333: 3323: 3314: 3291: 3287: 3281: 3273: 3263: 3262: 3258: 3198: 3185:. Retrieved 3174: 3164: 3152:. Retrieved 3141: 3131: 3122: 3115:. Retrieved 3111: 3101: 3093: 3044: 3033: 3032:. pp. 3, 4: 3015: 3008: 2999: 2998:. pp. 1, 2: 2981: 2974: 2966: 2961: 2925:toppled the 2903: 2895: 2856: 2716: 2713: 2687:Centre-right 2662: 2651: 2649: 2620: 2614: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2594: 2576: 2569: 2561: 2545: 2535: 2525: 2523: 2493: 2487: 2481: 2473: 2466: 2445:militaristic 2412:Bill Clinton 2385: 2375: 2370: 2368: 2350: 2325:Centre-right 2313:Centre-right 2296: 2282:factions). 2267: 2258: 2248: 2243: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2214: 2203: 2196:. Retrieved 2185: 2173: 2164: 2158:. Retrieved 2147: 2137: 2125:. Retrieved 2121: 2111: 2102: 2092: 2084: 2073: 2058: 2051: 2044:center-right 2022: 2013: 2012: 1999: 1997: 1990:. Retrieved 1979: 1969: 1961: 1954:. Retrieved 1939: 1929: 1921: 1898: 1894: 1888: 1878: 1876: 1853: 1849: 1843: 1831:. Retrieved 1827:The Atlantic 1826: 1816: 1804:. Retrieved 1800: 1790: 1778:. Retrieved 1773: 1764: 1752:. Retrieved 1748: 1738: 1726:. Retrieved 1720: 1711: 1702: 1692: 1684: 1674: 1672: 1660: 1607: 1603: 1598: 1596: 1531: 1526: 1524: 1498: 1493: 1491: 1466: 1461: 1459: 1437: 1391: 1386: 1384: 1321: 1243: 1187:The Atlantic 1074: 1066: 1043: 1032: 987: 981: 975: 969: 921: 897: 875: 835: 758: 736: 700:Project Talk 688: 669: 607:WikiProjects 590: 564: 554:Not promoted 547: 528: 488:is a former 485: 454: 450: 446: 439: 391: 375: 341: 325: 285: 195: 182: 176: 168: 161: 155: 149: 143: 133: 105: 30:This is the 4281:Alextitmier 4110:Reasoning: 4026:Alextitmier 3808:Davide King 3716:Davide King 3668:Change to " 3551:center-left 3382:: 267–334. 3298:: 169–191. 3269:Center-left 3061:Labor party 2939:Solid South 2857:two parties 2851:, which by 2695:Centre-left 2500:: 267–334. 2467:center-left 2449:imperialist 2406:Joe Manchin 2333:Centre-left 2280:centre-left 2230:Center-left 2040:center-left 1905:: 527–548. 1860:: 169–191. 1728:October 14, 1668:center-left 530:Peer review 440:written in 416:center-left 159:free images 42:not a forum 4849:Categories 4689:Gallup.com 4671:References 4481:|answered= 4427:the right. 4263:|answered= 4090:|answered= 3958:|answered= 3883:|answered= 3822:References 3796:personally 3780:Personally 3768:personally 3712:vice versa 3680:, and the 3407:coalition. 3340:CondĂ© Nast 3274:References 3094:References 3069:Bible Belt 2967:References 2685:listed as 2474:References 2323:listed as 2317:Right-wing 2160:2014-07-23 2085:References 1946:CondĂ© Nast 1685:References 1291:Andrijator 1247:Andrijator 1039:designated 4825:Headlines 4750:Emiya1980 4607:Reasons: 4597:Joe Biden 4571:Emiya1980 4518:Not done: 4410:Side-note 4300:Not done: 4135:Not done: 4000:Not done: 3920:Not done: 3703:Factions: 3686:Dhantegge 3615:Nidhiki05 3514:1537-5927 3395:2162-8572 3311:1094-2939 3187:April 24, 3154:April 24, 2800:Karl Marx 2646:1537-5927 2513:2162-8572 2376:Nidhiki05 2249:Nidhiki05 2193:0362-4331 1918:0739-3148 1873:1094-2939 1532:Nidhiki05 1499:Nidhiki05 1467:Nidhiki05 1392:Nidhiki05 1199:PtolemyXV 1191:PtolemyXV 1052:, or any 977:elections 595:is rated 350:citations 99:if needed 82:Be polite 32:talk page 4595:"During 4500:BH018123 4308:Cannolis 4173:unsigned 4156:Muboshgu 4008:Cannolis 3924:Muboshgu 3674:Blue Dog 3631:Carlp941 3350:June 16, 3344:Archived 3181:Archived 3148:Archived 2935:New Deal 2816:Dimadick 2808:populist 2453:Dimadick 2309:Big tent 2301:Big tent 2276:centrist 2272:Big tent 2263:big tent 2238:anything 2198:July 20, 2166:reforms. 2154:Archived 2014:Notelist 1992:June 17, 1986:Archived 1956:June 16, 1950:Archived 1624:Trumpism 1158:Carlp941 1128:Carlp941 1122:labeled. 1109:Carlp941 851:Politics 842:politics 793:American 788:Politics 535:Reviewed 455:traveled 400:centrism 396:big tent 348:Include 197:Archives 67:get help 40:This is 38:article. 4723:has an 4655:GoodDay 4544:has an 4021:States. 3845:May 23, 3753:Support 3699:Comment 3649:Support 3627:Support 3604:Comment 3585:Support 3571:BootsED 3543:dataset 3541:MARPOR 3402:2917253 3237:BootsED 3117:May 23, 3046:BootsED 2929:in the 2831:BootsED 2737:BootsED 2679:BootsED 2677:Agree @ 2664:BootsED 2520:2917253 2074:Support 2060:BootsED 2032:dataset 2030:MARPOR 1833:19 July 1806:19 July 1780:19 July 1754:19 July 878:on the 739:on the 631:History 597:B-class 513:Process 494:archive 451:defense 332:dispute 286:91 days 165:WP refs 153:scholar 4702:Remove 4532:(talk) 4358:Link: 4328:CLOSED 4141:Czello 4039:clear. 3766:While 3762:Oppose 3735:Oppose 3547:center 3519:party. 3316:party. 2896:before 2749:Like @ 2714:Oppose 2392:. The 2388:with @ 2234:wildly 2127:31 May 2036:center 1664:center 705:Alerts 603:scale. 516:Result 410:, and 137:Google 4485:|ans= 4475:This 4267:|ans= 4257:This 4094:|ans= 4084:This 3962:|ans= 3952:This 3887:|ans= 3877:This 3501:: 3. 3378:(2). 3294:(1). 2867:, or 2806:were 2751:Mhaot 2699:Mhaot 2633:: 3. 2496:(2). 2386:Agree 2337:Mhaot 1901:(4). 1856:(1). 1442:WP:OR 1438:Agree 1322:Agree 584:This 447:color 202:Index 180:JSTOR 141:books 95:Seek 4836:talk 4823:See 4814:talk 4774:talk 4754:talk 4710:talk 4659:talk 4641:talk 4575:talk 4504:talk 4439:talk 4418:talk 4383:talk 4367:talk 4312:talk 4285:talk 4233:talk 4218:talk 4197:talk 4181:talk 4160:talk 4154:. – 4120:talk 4056:talk 4030:talk 4012:talk 3985:talk 3928:talk 3905:talk 3847:2024 3812:talk 3744:talk 3720:talk 3690:talk 3676:and 3657:talk 3635:talk 3593:talk 3575:talk 3511:ISSN 3465:ISBN 3399:SSRN 3392:ISSN 3376:2018 3352:2024 3308:ISSN 3241:talk 3222:talk 3204:talk 3189:2023 3156:2023 3119:2024 3050:talk 3025:ISBN 2991:ISBN 2947:talk 2898:the 2884:talk 2835:talk 2820:talk 2778:talk 2759:talk 2741:talk 2726:talk 2703:talk 2689:and 2668:talk 2643:ISSN 2586:ISBN 2517:SSRN 2510:ISSN 2494:2018 2457:talk 2447:and 2424:talk 2404:and 2359:talk 2341:talk 2327:and 2288:talk 2278:and 2220:talk 2200:2022 2190:ISSN 2129:2022 2064:talk 1994:2024 1958:2024 1915:ISSN 1870:ISSN 1835:2024 1808:2024 1782:2024 1756:2024 1730:2018 1647:talk 1633:talk 1613:talk 1588:talk 1564:talk 1550:talk 1515:talk 1482:talk 1450:talk 1421:talk 1407:talk 1374:talk 1360:talk 1346:talk 1331:talk 1309:talk 1295:talk 1280:talk 1266:talk 1251:talk 1218:talk 1203:talk 1195:talk 1176:talk 1162:talk 1147:talk 1132:talk 1113:talk 1098:talk 1082:talk 1033:The 870:High 510:Date 379:edit 373:view 173:FENS 147:news 84:and 4832:TFD 4725:RfC 4706:TFD 4585:RfC 4546:RfC 4483:or 4435:TFD 4379:TFD 4265:or 4229:TFD 4193:TFD 4092:or 3960:or 3885:or 3740:TFD 3610:Toa 3549:to 3503:doi 3433:doi 3384:doi 3300:doi 3218:TFD 2774:TFD 2722:TFD 2635:doi 2554:doi 2502:doi 2371:Toa 2351:and 2315:to 2268:not 2244:Toa 2122:Vox 2038:to 1907:doi 1862:doi 1681:). 1666:to 1609:TFD 1546:TFD 1527:Toa 1494:Toa 1462:Toa 1387:Toa 1342:TFD 1305:TFD 1276:TFD 1143:TFD 1094:TFD 731:Top 392:A1: 187:TWL 4851:: 4838:) 4816:) 4776:) 4756:) 4712:) 4687:. 4661:) 4643:) 4603:." 4577:) 4506:) 4489:no 4441:) 4420:) 4385:) 4369:) 4314:) 4287:) 4271:no 4235:) 4220:) 4199:) 4183:) 4162:) 4122:) 4098:no 4058:) 4032:) 4014:) 3987:) 3966:no 3930:) 3907:) 3891:no 3849:. 3838:. 3814:) 3746:) 3722:) 3692:) 3684:. 3659:) 3653:DN 3637:) 3595:) 3577:) 3516:. 3509:. 3493:. 3463:. 3459:. 3439:. 3427:. 3423:. 3404:. 3397:. 3390:. 3374:. 3354:. 3342:. 3332:. 3313:. 3306:. 3292:10 3290:. 3243:) 3224:) 3206:) 3179:. 3173:. 3146:. 3140:. 3121:. 3110:. 3052:) 3023:. 2989:. 2949:) 2906:-- 2886:) 2863:, 2837:) 2822:) 2780:) 2761:) 2743:) 2728:) 2705:) 2670:) 2648:. 2641:. 2625:. 2584:. 2580:. 2560:. 2548:. 2544:. 2522:. 2515:. 2508:. 2492:. 2459:) 2426:) 2361:) 2343:) 2290:) 2222:) 2202:. 2188:. 2184:. 2163:. 2152:. 2146:. 2120:. 2101:. 2066:) 1996:. 1978:. 1960:. 1948:. 1938:. 1920:. 1913:. 1899:34 1897:. 1875:. 1868:. 1854:10 1852:. 1825:. 1799:. 1772:. 1747:. 1719:. 1701:. 1649:) 1635:) 1615:) 1590:) 1566:) 1552:) 1517:) 1484:) 1452:) 1440:, 1423:) 1409:) 1376:) 1362:) 1348:) 1333:) 1311:) 1297:) 1282:) 1268:) 1253:) 1220:) 1205:) 1178:) 1164:) 1149:) 1134:) 1115:) 1100:) 1084:) 980:, 930:). 906:). 795:/ 791:: 767:). 629:: 453:, 449:, 406:, 402:, 284:: 278:19 276:, 274:18 272:, 270:17 268:, 266:16 264:, 262:15 260:, 258:14 256:, 254:13 252:, 250:12 248:, 246:11 244:, 242:10 240:, 236:, 232:, 228:, 224:, 220:, 216:, 212:, 208:, 204:, 167:) 65:; 4834:( 4812:( 4772:( 4752:( 4708:( 4691:. 4657:( 4639:( 4632:. 4573:( 4502:( 4437:( 4416:( 4381:( 4365:( 4310:( 4283:( 4231:( 4216:( 4195:( 4179:( 4158:( 4118:( 4054:( 4028:( 4010:( 3983:( 3926:( 3903:( 3810:( 3742:( 3718:( 3688:( 3655:( 3633:( 3591:( 3573:( 3505:: 3435:: 3386:: 3302:: 3239:( 3220:( 3202:( 3191:. 3158:. 3048:( 2945:( 2882:( 2833:( 2818:( 2814:. 2776:( 2757:( 2739:( 2724:( 2701:( 2666:( 2637:: 2556:: 2504:: 2455:( 2422:( 2357:( 2339:( 2286:( 2218:( 2131:. 2105:. 2062:( 1909:: 1864:: 1837:. 1810:. 1784:. 1758:. 1732:. 1705:. 1662:" 1645:( 1631:( 1611:( 1586:( 1562:( 1548:( 1513:( 1480:( 1448:( 1419:( 1405:( 1372:( 1358:( 1344:( 1329:( 1307:( 1293:( 1278:( 1264:( 1249:( 1216:( 1201:( 1193:( 1174:( 1160:( 1145:( 1130:( 1111:( 1096:( 1080:( 992:. 882:. 743:. 609:: 496:. 469:. 376:· 346:. 334:. 238:9 234:8 230:7 226:6 222:5 218:4 214:3 210:2 206:1 199:: 183:· 177:· 169:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 139:( 69:. 20:)

Index

Talk:United States Democratic Party
talk page
Democratic Party (United States)
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
Index
1
2
3
4

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑