346:
325:
356:
859:
540:
519:
550:
756:
729:
655:
766:
162:
124:
971:
55:
909:
891:
645:
624:
140:
102:
21:
209:
261:
240:
1047:
451:
430:
1266:
We can't put stuff like that together in the article, that would be original research. The lawyer said it was not primary and as far as i can see that was not challenged, but then again that was an extradition hearing so the prosecution didn't really have to counter anything. All we can do is report
1233:
When the newspapers published stuff from
Wikileaks they required Wikileaks to always publish the leaks a few hours in advance so Wikileaks would be the primary publisher even though they already had the facts and had set up their stories. This was to protect them from prosecution for publishing the
1405:
Had a quick look at the "Contents of the United States diplomatic cables leak" page and was not very impressed. Linking to it won't solve the problem of a proper coverage of the leaks. Would suggest compiling a list of the most significant leaks for coverage on this page. Not every group of cables
1123:
There are a number of sites saying Leigh said
Assange gave him a temporary password that would expire after a few hours. However Leigh in the book and in interviews like says Assange assured him the site would expire within a matter of hours, but says nothing about a temporary password that I can
1420:
I feel the actual contents of the leaks and the reactions to them should be in separate sections from the actions against
Wikileaks and the ins and outs of some not being redacted and suchlike stuff. Of course one has to say who released a particular load of leaks and when but the two threads are
1127:
I'm not exactly sure what to say in the article. Since this article goes in depth about the business perhaps have the quotes from both Leigh and The
Guardian but avoid the ones that probably confused the two. The politico cite above with the interview with Leigh could give some of the other stuff
1234:
facts. In this case
Cryptome is the primary publisher and Wikileaks only published the unredacted cables after it saw they were already out in the open. I'm not sure of the legal implications but I'd have thought the newspapers have good legal advice for that sort of situation.
1124:
find. The
Guardian said that they had been "told it was a temporary password which would expire and be deleted in a matter of hours." I think sources have cnfused the two evn though only David Leigh and Assange were involvd in negotiating the transfer according to Leigh's book.
1526:
you will see it is corrupted. That is the citation we need for 2,017 number in the article and what was used before (you need to click on date field to get it) in https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=United_States_diplomatic_cables_leak&oldid=428427700&action=edit
1289:
The article says Leigh said he thought the password would expire. As I said above I don't believe he has said that, the
Guardian said that and he said he thought the site would disappear. There's no need to make out he's even more stupid than he was.
184:
policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or
1362:
I thought it put the criticism of the leaks in perspective. Anyway, it does point to an imbalance in the article. The content of the leaks are at least as important as the reactions to them. The article currently does not reflect that.
1214:
I think we also need to explain what "primary publisher" means here, and what it doesnt. Is it a legal technicality or is
Cryptome the a co-publisher? If they are, we should talk about that a little more. Either way we should explain
1249:
When the newspapers published stuff from
Wikileaks they required Wikileaks to always publish the leaks a few hours in advance so Wikileaks would be the primary publisher even though they already had the facts and had set up their
1381:, so I just dont think this is a good example to use. Theres no BLP issue or anything like that to object to, so if you wanna reinsert it I wont revert it again, but if there are any other examples I think that would be better
1477:
In the lead we say that it started in
November 2010, and in the Sequence of leaks section we point out that hte first cable was published in February 2010. Maybe we should point that out or change the wording in the lead
1318:
I think that would be best thanks. I thought it best to raise the problem at the talk page in case people cite the source which is very probably wrong. I think both can go in under the denial business in biographies.
1501:
etc. commenced publication in Nov. The first sentence needs to be changed accordingly. Some research may be required to determine whether the term "Cablegate" refers to the earlier or later publication.
307:
1569:
1528:
272:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
501:
1709:
1614:
273:
1694:
1684:
873:
796:
1634:
491:
1594:
1406:
need to be covered. Significant ones include the killing of an Iraqi family and bombing of their house (covered here under "Consequences of the release"??), spying on UN personnel ...
1699:
194:
1639:
1344:
1094:
Not sure how to do this, but here's the story on how the cables got redacted. I told people how to do it. That paragraph describing it on the main page is speculative gibberish.
813:
467:
412:
268:
245:
1388:
1385:
Anyway, it does point to an imbalance in the article. The content of the leaks are at least as important as the reactions to them. The article currently does not reflect that.
997:
992:
987:
1689:
1624:
402:
1629:
1573:
1532:
868:
849:
739:
458:
435:
1391:. But we can probably do better than the contents section that says "it talked about topics" now that the body doesnt include file hashes and IP addresses anymore
378:
1679:
1609:
839:
297:
924:
896:
803:
711:
606:
1704:
1664:
1619:
701:
808:
1599:
369:
330:
180:
1649:
596:
40:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about the United States diplomatic cables leak at the
1669:
677:
1674:
1604:
1654:
779:
734:
572:
1095:
1493:
The difference appears to relate to the party which published the cables. Wikileaks began publishing cables in Feb and its partners such as
1343:
I didnt think it fit in the section and since it wasnt responding to anyone or anything in particular, I took it out. It might go better in
1107:
1659:
1554:
it was used more than 10 years ago, that doesnt mean it should be used now. and it was used then because it was current then. its not now.
28:
345:
324:
668:
629:
37:
1644:
791:
563:
524:
33:
787:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
220:
1208:
I was just coming here to say I thought the section needed work, and to tag you to ask your thoughts before I started on it.
1387:
Youll have no argument from me. There should at least be stuff on its impact, if we dont want to summarize too much of
84:
1030:
80:
1523:
41:
1171:
1211:
I was gonna point out the things you did, and also say maybe we dont need the file hash and the Twitter user stuff.
161:
123:
186:
1009:
858:
193:. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see
1252:
If theres a citation for that then I think the rest of your reasoning is good and would be really good context
361:
226:
1559:
1483:
1456:
1440:
1396:
1352:
1309:
1257:
1220:
1153:
1101:
1072:
463:
1096:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140816145138/http://nigelparry.com/news/guardian-david-leigh-cablegate.shtml
1108:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/leak-at-wikileaks-a-dispatch-disaster-in-six-acts-a-783778.html
88:
676:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
571:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
466:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
377:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
549:
539:
518:
1546:
at best and not encyclopedic claim. adding a citation to a dead URL and a broken archive is not right
771:
152:
114:
1577:
1563:
1543:
1536:
1511:
1503:
1487:
1460:
1444:
1430:
1415:
1407:
1400:
1372:
1364:
1356:
1328:
1313:
1299:
1276:
1261:
1243:
1224:
1202:
929:
208:
1507:
1411:
1368:
1080:
1555:
1479:
1452:
1436:
1426:
1392:
1348:
1324:
1305:
1295:
1272:
1253:
1239:
1216:
1198:
1133:
1015:
1013:
755:
728:
1112:
Here's Greenwald's article from the time correctly noting the source/process of the redaction:
139:
101:
1079:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
660:
374:
145:
A news item involving United States diplomatic cables leak was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
107:
A news item involving United States diplomatic cables leak was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1059:
1011:
970:
63:
54:
555:
32:
for general discussion about the United States diplomatic cables leak. Any such comments
1588:
1422:
1320:
1291:
1268:
1235:
1194:
1129:
784:
915:
1524:
https://www.webcitation.org/query?id=1294550273571039&date=%400&fromform=1
908:
890:
1113:
919:
1071:] The anchor (#Levels of classification used by the U.S. government) has been
761:
673:
650:
644:
623:
545:
351:
1378:
146:
108:
783:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
79:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
1102:
https://unspecified.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/wikileaks-password-leak-faq/
568:
1377:
I get what youre saying but that particular quote from him seemed kinda
1106:
For the record, the latter parts of this are also speculative nonsense:
1067:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
1172:"Unredacted US embassy cables available online after WikiLeaks breach"
260:
239:
450:
429:
1041:
1016:
964:
202:
172:
134:
96:
49:
15:
1119:
A messy problem about temporary password or file or webserver
857:
160:
122:
1542:
an archive of an IP that says its a mirror of Wikileaks is
1568:
There are not and will not be any better sources. WHAT?
567:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
282:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
1304:
We should just present and attribute both shouldnt we?
1345:
Reactions to the United States diplomatic cables leak
1389:
Contents of the United States diplomatic cables leak
672:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
462:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
373:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
476:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject International relations
1595:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use American English
1710:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
1615:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
938:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
285:Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
1695:Low-importance United States Government articles
1685:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
1635:Mid-importance International relations articles
1518:I will contact webcite to fix the link we need
1700:WikiProject United States Government articles
1114:http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/wikileaks_28/
1024:This page has archives. Sections older than
387:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Freedom of speech
8:
1640:WikiProject International relations articles
479:Template:WikiProject International relations
941:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
885:
723:
618:
513:
424:
319:
234:
189:contentious material about living persons
67:, which has its own spelling conventions (
1690:C-Class United States Government articles
1625:Mid-importance Freedom of speech articles
824:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
1630:C-Class International relations articles
269:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
1570:2A00:1370:8184:FC01:31FC:8534:FB31:556E
1529:2A00:1370:8184:FC01:31FC:8534:FB31:556E
1144:
887:
725:
620:
515:
426:
321:
236:
206:
1551:
1384:
1248:
1034:when more than 4 sections are present.
686:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Journalism
390:Template:WikiProject Freedom of speech
1680:Low-importance United States articles
1610:Low-importance Crime-related articles
87:, this should not be changed without
7:
1600:Knowledge (XXG) In the news articles
1152:Press, Associated (31 August 2011).
777:This article is within the scope of
666:This article is within the scope of
581:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Internet
561:This article is within the scope of
456:This article is within the scope of
367:This article is within the scope of
266:This article is within the scope of
459:WikiProject International relations
1705:WikiProject United States articles
1665:Mid-importance Journalism articles
1620:C-Class Freedom of speech articles
827:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1028:may be automatically archived by
1650:Low-importance Internet articles
1347:which could go into more detail
1154:"WikiLeaks: U.S. cables exposed"
1045:
969:
907:
889:
764:
754:
727:
653:
643:
622:
548:
538:
517:
482:International relations articles
449:
428:
354:
344:
323:
259:
238:
207:
138:
100:
53:
19:
1670:WikiProject Journalism articles
844:This article has been rated as
706:This article has been rated as
689:Template:WikiProject Journalism
601:This article has been rated as
496:This article has been rated as
407:This article has been rated as
302:This article has been rated as
1675:C-Class United States articles
1605:C-Class Crime-related articles
1225:12:46, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
944:Guild of Copy Editors articles
225:It is of interest to multiple
1:
1655:WikiProject Internet articles
1512:11:25, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
1488:08:09, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
1461:17:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
1445:17:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
1431:17:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
1416:14:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
1401:13:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
1373:13:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
1357:12:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
1329:22:58, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
1314:16:18, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
1300:23:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
1277:23:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
1262:17:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
1244:16:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
930:20:20, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
866:This article is supported by
680:and see a list of open tasks.
584:Template:WikiProject Internet
575:and see a list of open tasks.
470:and see a list of open tasks.
381:and see a list of open tasks.
370:WikiProject Freedom of speech
276:and see a list of open tasks.
181:biographies of living persons
1421:pretty separate after that.
1339:Additional Greenwald comment
279:Crime and Criminal Biography
246:Crime and Criminal Biography
157:section on 3 September 2011.
119:section on 28 November 2010.
1660:C-Class Journalism articles
869:WikiProject U.S. Government
191:must be removed immediately
1726:
1203:00:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
850:project's importance scale
712:project's importance scale
607:project's importance scale
502:project's importance scale
413:project's importance scale
393:Freedom of speech articles
308:project's importance scale
1645:C-Class Internet articles
1578:23:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
1564:17:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
1537:16:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
902:
865:
843:
780:WikiProject United States
749:
705:
638:
600:
533:
495:
444:
406:
339:
301:
254:
233:
1552:and what was used before
785:United States of America
362:Freedom of speech portal
473:International relations
464:International relations
436:International relations
1473:Start date in the lead
1267:what was in the news.
1073:deleted by other users
1031:Lowercase sigmabot III
862:
830:United States articles
669:WikiProject Journalism
288:Crime-related articles
215:This article is rated
166:
128:
935:Guild of Copy Editors
925:Guild of Copy Editors
897:Guild of Copy Editors
861:
219:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
164:
126:
772:United States portal
564:WikiProject Internet
85:relevant style guide
81:varieties of English
1522:So if you click on
798:Articles Requested!
692:Journalism articles
83:. According to the
1451:Sounds good to me
1100:This is good too:
922:, a member of the
863:
221:content assessment
167:
129:
31:
1087:
1086:
1062:in most browsers.
1038:
1037:
1003:
1002:
960:
959:
956:
955:
952:
951:
914:This article was
884:
883:
880:
879:
722:
721:
718:
717:
661:Journalism portal
617:
616:
613:
612:
587:Internet articles
512:
511:
508:
507:
423:
422:
419:
418:
384:Freedom of speech
375:Freedom of speech
331:Freedom of speech
318:
317:
314:
313:
201:
200:
171:
170:
133:
132:
95:
94:
48:
47:
27:
1717:
1187:
1186:
1184:
1183:
1168:
1162:
1161:
1149:
1128:Leigh says too.
1081:Reporting errors
1049:
1048:
1042:
1033:
1017:
984:
983:
973:
965:
946:
945:
942:
939:
936:
911:
904:
903:
893:
886:
832:
831:
828:
825:
822:
774:
769:
768:
767:
758:
751:
750:
745:
742:
731:
724:
694:
693:
690:
687:
684:
663:
658:
657:
656:
647:
640:
639:
634:
626:
619:
589:
588:
585:
582:
579:
558:
553:
552:
542:
535:
534:
529:
521:
514:
484:
483:
480:
477:
474:
453:
446:
445:
440:
432:
425:
395:
394:
391:
388:
385:
364:
359:
358:
357:
348:
341:
340:
335:
327:
320:
290:
289:
286:
283:
280:
263:
256:
255:
250:
242:
235:
218:
212:
211:
203:
195:this noticeboard
173:
142:
135:
104:
97:
64:American English
60:This article is
57:
50:
23:
22:
16:
1725:
1724:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1585:
1584:
1520:
1475:
1341:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1181:
1179:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1151:
1150:
1146:
1121:
1092:
1083:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1046:
1029:
1018:
1012:
978:
943:
940:
937:
934:
933:
829:
826:
823:
820:
819:
818:
804:Become a Member
770:
765:
763:
743:
737:
691:
688:
685:
682:
681:
659:
654:
652:
632:
586:
583:
580:
577:
576:
556:Internet portal
554:
547:
527:
481:
478:
475:
472:
471:
438:
392:
389:
386:
383:
382:
360:
355:
353:
333:
287:
284:
281:
278:
277:
248:
216:
165:Knowledge (XXG)
127:Knowledge (XXG)
89:broad consensus
20:
12:
11:
5:
1723:
1721:
1713:
1712:
1707:
1702:
1697:
1692:
1687:
1682:
1677:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1627:
1622:
1617:
1612:
1607:
1602:
1597:
1587:
1586:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1548:
1547:
1519:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1474:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1382:
1340:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1228:
1227:
1212:
1209:
1189:
1188:
1163:
1143:
1142:
1138:
1120:
1117:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1060:case-sensitive
1054:
1053:
1052:
1050:
1036:
1035:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1014:
1010:
1008:
1005:
1004:
1001:
1000:
995:
990:
980:
979:
974:
968:
962:
958:
957:
954:
953:
950:
949:
947:
912:
900:
899:
894:
882:
881:
878:
877:
874:Low-importance
864:
854:
853:
846:Low-importance
842:
836:
835:
833:
817:
816:
811:
806:
801:
794:
792:Template Usage
788:
776:
775:
759:
747:
746:
744:Low‑importance
732:
720:
719:
716:
715:
708:Mid-importance
704:
698:
697:
695:
678:the discussion
665:
664:
648:
636:
635:
633:Mid‑importance
627:
615:
614:
611:
610:
603:Low-importance
599:
593:
592:
590:
573:the discussion
560:
559:
543:
531:
530:
528:Low‑importance
522:
510:
509:
506:
505:
498:Mid-importance
494:
488:
487:
485:
468:the discussion
454:
442:
441:
439:Mid‑importance
433:
421:
420:
417:
416:
409:Mid-importance
405:
399:
398:
396:
379:the discussion
366:
365:
349:
337:
336:
334:Mid‑importance
328:
316:
315:
312:
311:
304:Low-importance
300:
294:
293:
291:
274:the discussion
264:
252:
251:
249:Low‑importance
243:
231:
230:
224:
213:
199:
198:
187:poorly sourced
176:
169:
168:
158:
143:
131:
130:
120:
105:
93:
92:
58:
46:
45:
42:Reference desk
34:may be removed
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1722:
1711:
1708:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1698:
1696:
1693:
1691:
1688:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1621:
1618:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1608:
1606:
1603:
1601:
1598:
1596:
1593:
1592:
1590:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1556:Softlemonades
1553:
1550:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1525:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1480:Softlemonades
1472:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1453:Softlemonades
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1437:Softlemonades
1434:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1393:Softlemonades
1390:
1386:
1383:
1380:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1349:Softlemonades
1346:
1338:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1306:Softlemonades
1303:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1288:
1287:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1254:Softlemonades
1251:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1217:Softlemonades
1213:
1210:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1177:
1173:
1167:
1164:
1159:
1155:
1148:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1135:
1131:
1125:
1118:
1116:
1115:
1110:
1109:
1104:
1103:
1098:
1097:
1089:
1082:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1061:
1057:
1051:
1044:
1043:
1040:
1032:
1027:
1022:
1021:
1007:
1006:
999:
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
985:
982:
981:
977:
972:
967:
966:
963:
948:
931:
927:
926:
921:
917:
913:
910:
906:
905:
901:
898:
895:
892:
888:
875:
872:(assessed as
871:
870:
860:
856:
855:
851:
847:
841:
838:
837:
834:
821:United States
815:
812:
810:
807:
805:
802:
800:
799:
795:
793:
790:
789:
786:
782:
781:
773:
762:
760:
757:
753:
752:
748:
741:
736:
735:United States
733:
730:
726:
713:
709:
703:
700:
699:
696:
679:
675:
671:
670:
662:
651:
649:
646:
642:
641:
637:
631:
628:
625:
621:
608:
604:
598:
595:
594:
591:
574:
570:
566:
565:
557:
551:
546:
544:
541:
537:
536:
532:
526:
523:
520:
516:
503:
499:
493:
490:
489:
486:
469:
465:
461:
460:
455:
452:
448:
447:
443:
437:
434:
431:
427:
414:
410:
404:
401:
400:
397:
380:
376:
372:
371:
363:
352:
350:
347:
343:
342:
338:
332:
329:
326:
322:
309:
305:
299:
296:
295:
292:
275:
271:
270:
265:
262:
258:
257:
253:
247:
244:
241:
237:
232:
228:
222:
214:
210:
205:
204:
196:
192:
188:
183:
182:
177:
175:
174:
163:
159:
156:
155:
154:
148:
144:
141:
137:
136:
125:
121:
118:
117:
116:
110:
106:
103:
99:
98:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
59:
56:
52:
51:
43:
39:
35:
30:
26:This page is
25:
18:
17:
1521:
1498:
1494:
1476:
1342:
1193:
1180:. Retrieved
1178:. 2011-09-01
1176:the Guardian
1175:
1166:
1157:
1147:
1139:
1126:
1122:
1111:
1105:
1099:
1093:
1066:
1058:Anchors are
1055:
1039:
1025:
975:
961:
923:
867:
845:
809:Project Talk
797:
778:
707:
667:
602:
562:
497:
457:
408:
368:
303:
267:
227:WikiProjects
190:
179:
151:
150:
113:
112:
76:
72:
68:
61:
1499:Der Spiegel
916:copy edited
153:In the news
115:In the news
62:written in
29:not a forum
1589:Categories
1544:WP:PRIMARY
1182:2022-07-30
1140:References
740:Government
683:Journalism
674:journalism
630:Journalism
178:While the
38:refactored
1504:Burrobert
1435:Well put
1408:Burrobert
1379:straw man
1365:Burrobert
998:Archive 3
993:Archive 2
988:Archive 1
147:Main Page
109:Main Page
1423:NadVolum
1321:NadVolum
1292:NadVolum
1269:NadVolum
1236:NadVolum
1195:NadVolum
1158:POLITICO
1130:NadVolum
1090:Untitled
976:Archives
578:Internet
569:Internet
525:Internet
77:traveled
1495:El Pais
1250:stories
1075:before.
1026:60 days
848:on the
710:on the
605:on the
500:on the
411:on the
306:on the
217:C-class
149:in the
111:in the
73:defense
920:Lihaas
814:Alerts
223:scale.
928:, on
69:color
1574:talk
1560:talk
1533:talk
1508:talk
1484:talk
1457:talk
1441:talk
1427:talk
1412:talk
1397:talk
1369:talk
1353:talk
1325:talk
1310:talk
1296:talk
1273:talk
1258:talk
1240:talk
1221:talk
1199:talk
1134:talk
1056:Tip:
918:by
840:Low
702:Mid
597:Low
492:Mid
403:Mid
298:Low
36:or
1591::
1576:)
1562:)
1535:)
1510:)
1497:,
1486:)
1459:)
1443:)
1429:)
1414:)
1399:)
1371:)
1355:)
1327:)
1312:)
1298:)
1275:)
1260:)
1242:)
1223:)
1201:)
1174:.
1156:.
1136:)
876:).
738::
75:,
71:,
1572:(
1558:(
1531:(
1506:(
1482:(
1455:(
1439:(
1425:(
1410:(
1395:(
1367:(
1351:(
1323:(
1308:(
1294:(
1271:(
1256:(
1238:(
1219:(
1197:(
1185:.
1160:.
1132:(
932:.
852:.
714:.
609:.
504:.
415:.
310:.
229:.
197:.
91:.
44:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
-logo-v2.svg.png){kind=logo}
