Talk:Volume! - Knowledge

605:

are scholars such as H. Becker, S. Frith, B. Lebrun, S. Lacasse, A. Hennion, B. Péquignot : these are MAJOR popular music studies scholars. Prof. Lebrun directed an issue f Volume ! on French Popular music. Prof. Sheila Whiteley, leading British scholar on the sixties, will be directing an issue on music and countercultures - the CFP is online all over the place. In France, Philippe Le Guern directed an issue, and he published a book with Simon Frith, one of the founders of PMS. We published a comparative sociology of popular music in France and Britain, which was published by Ashgate in England, by Hugh Dauncey and Ph. Le Guern. These are serious academics, who support the journal, some have directed issues, others have published articles in it, all have accepted to figure in our journal as members of the editorial board. It is not known enough, yet, in the US and the UK, because we are based in France and publish mainly in French. We will soon be on two major francophone portals, Cairn and revues.org (announced here :

429:

populaires au moment de la création de Volume !, attesté par des spécialistes) qui conditionne B (le désir de répondre à ce manque en créant Volume !). La chaîne logique n'est pas la même. L'objectif de la revue : répondre à un besoin par ailleurs attesté par des chercheurs. Il n'y a que deux chaînons logiques, pas trois. L'ajout de propos d'universitaires ne dit rien de Volume ! en soi, certes, mais pour que nous puissions dire que tels étaient nos objectifs, il faut "sourcer", comme on nous le demande systématiquement sur WP. Donc je ne vois guère ce que je peux faire, entre l'injonction de "sourcer" et votre position, qui me semble un peu abusive. Cordialement

99: 81: 524: 454: 183: 162: 761:) and Cairn.info (they work together). This means a committee of experts looked at the journal, asked specialists to judge its quality etc. before accepting it on the portals. Articles will be online in September. These are two major portals of the French-speaking world - and it's too bad the American databases don't even consider anything in any other language than English as important. 193: 50: 21: 735:("I am indebted to Fabien Hein for alerting me to a number of these items. Together we published a version of this bibliography in Hein, F. and Kahn-Harris K. ‘Études Metal: Metal Studies: Une Bibliographe’ in Copyright Volume! 5/2 2006 19-32") - Copyright Volume ! being the first title of the publication, before it became simply "Volume !" in 2010 (issue n°7-1). 980: 942: 389:

But if that is what the journal's founders thought back then? Can't I combine what they say (we believed a specific scholarly space for popular music studies was necessary) and what other scholars said (that that space didn't exist)? According to WP, this is too far-fetched? Thanks for your patience.

1217:

was on the verge of resigning en masse. I understand that you cannot reveal whether a board member has reviewed a particular article, but that is irrelevant anyway. Many researchers review many articles for many journals, that does not mean that their names should be listed in the articles on those

738:

And we are on Philip Tagg's database (just type "volume !" in the research bar) - we actually published a new translation of an important letter he wrote, organized a conference about that letter, and just published the selected papers of the conference in our 8-1 issue on "Black Music". :Cf. here:

604:

Compare with Rolling Stone without the notability ??? There are SCHOLARS, among which Prof. David Looseley, pioneer of popular music studies, who wrote about Volume !. In the editorial board, which is online and in every single issue (16 of them up to now) of the paper version of the journal, there

1144:

We don't have listings of editorial boards in any journal article, so I don't see why we should make an exception here. That the board members are notable is not surprising, no journal will ask non-notable people to sit on their board... But the usual arguments hold: board members rarely are more

688:

HNET is an important online source (based at Michigan State University) for scholarly calls for papers, academic announcements etc. "H-Net is an international interdisciplinary organization of scholars and teachers dedicated to developing the enormous educational potential of the Internet and the

886:

I understand that. But, well, I guess that if there are a few dozen Pokemon pages, one on a scholarly journal - the only one in France dedicated to popular music studies - may not be a total fraud, at least relatively. Once again, we're on Tagg's popular musis studies database, on revues.org and

772:

the peer review is probably done by the editorial board. This is common in the humanities journals (I think). Is there anywhere on the web site that discusses the peer review process? I read a in a discussion thread that says this is a peer reviewed publication, but that is not a reliable source

1181:

and "google" them to see if they are relevant or not, within the field of popular music studies. Or find a popular music studies wikischolar to judge, if you aren't an expert. For the moment, none of the members of our editorial board have… refused to be part of it after having enthusiastically

859:

This has been a very interesting discovery process. I will need time to read through the information you provided from (top to bottom). I will ask around to see if HNET (based at Michigan State University) can be used as a source, since you say there is a vetting process. It gives a really good

584:

The meager sources I could find on this publication (and translate) appear to indicate that this is a commercial publication, and not really a scholarly academic journal. It seems more like a music magazine or music-culture magazine. Maybe I can compare it to Rolling Stone magazine without the

428:

J'avais bien compris cet argument. Il s'agit d'autre chose ici : la revue fut créée pour répondre à un manque. Or ce manque existait, comme le soutiennent certains universitaires. Ce n'est pas un argument tiers qui découle de A + B. Tout simplement A (pas de revue de recherche sur les musiques

869:

I apologize for my comments as well. I didn't realize that you people have been working hard for serious recognition. Hopefully, you can understand that Knowledge has to maintain a certain level of standards or it becomes trivial, and not an encyclopedia. Please understand that it is nothing

368:

says something like "because of the situation in France a journal was needed and that should be Volume!", you cannot conclude from the fact that the source says something about the situation in France that this means the journal was needed, even if this seems obvious to you. In WP you need

1172:

the links + the fact that S. Whiteley, A. Bennett, I. Inglis will be publishing shortly, in our "countercultures" issue coming in September 2012, Michael Bull, Theodore Gracyk, Mark Duffett in our "listening" issue (Dec. 2012), H. Dauncey in our "nostalgia" issue coming in Sept. 2013 -

1167:

The idea of a peer-review process is that it is anonymous: we cannot reveal that this or that academic has reviewed an article. You won't find any scholar who puts on his personal page "reviewed this article for volume". Our board members publish articles in our journal (cf here.

705:

In the future please don't change section titles created by other editors on talk pages. There is no problem with creating an original section title, and then comment, reply, or whatever is desired. I took the liberty of creating two section titles. I am assuming good faith

1128:

I don't have a problem with keeping the "Editorial board" section in this particular article. It is a very small list of names and two of these have articles (one in the French Knowledge). It may be these people are notable in this area. Comments? ----

530: 844:

Thank you for your time, and sorry about the previous tone, but sometimes, when you have been working hard on something that is starting to get some serious recognition, it's tough to accept certain comments, especially on a place like WP.

349:

Je vous comprends très bien aussi, mais comme l'argument justifie l'existence d'une revue sur les musiques populaires en France (raison pour laquelle les créateurs de l'association qui publie la revue l'ont créée), ça semble correct, non ?

666:

Yes, I did briefly check out your website. The layout seems to be very confusing for someone who does not read in the French language. I have now taken a more in-depth look at this journal's web site using English translations (see

730:

On this specific page, the "metal studies bibliography" was actually done by K. Kahn-Harris and French scholar Fabien Hein, and first published in Volume ! n°5-2 (on metal music). If you follow the link, we are quoted on his site :

1266:

given perusal of talk page and comments on the COI special interest board. General inability to check sources in the English language; there was no mention of this publication on the English-version of the leading French news site

647:

PS : please, if someone is going to judge the relevance of Volume!'s presence on WP, please, let it be someone who knows something about popular music studies! And who does not ask Google for help in such matters! Thank

1293:

People visit the websites more than the Knowledge page, I have stats for that. How can you pretend Knowledge stats reveal anything about the significance of a journal? I don't understand this fetichism.

781:

A first review of all articles submitted is first done by the editors of the journal, then articles deemed receivable are sent to reviewers. The reviewers are either members of the editorial board (

776:. It gives a very brief over view of how the peer review process works for this publication. First the submission is vetted by the editorial board. "Then it is blindly peer-reviewed by specialists". 625:

Can't you just go beyond your certainties, and try and do some other type of research than just the good old googling? This is such an insult! You can find 18 scholarly articles online here:

460: 631:

Did you even just check out our website? Who, Steve Quinn, do you think you are, to just write off things, with such contempt, in three lines and two minutes spent on Google? Best,

795:? This is linked to the main page of the journal web site. It appears to be important. You will have to forgive that my unfamiliarity with French culture leads to such questions. 142: 702:

And if we published the proceedings of an IASPM conference, although you say that this is "circular", isn't that proof of our recognition, by a major international institution?

800:Éditions Mélanie Seteun is the name of the publisher: an associative publisher, in charge of Volume ! and a collection of books dedicated to the sociology of popular music. 1290:

ALL of these questions have been addressed on this page, how can you just pretend the journal lacks notability, when I gave dozens of refs and links? I feel like Sisyphus…

552:

Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Knowledge, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (

482:

Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Knowledge, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (

912: 1397: 1174: 1055:

site reviewing the latest issues of Volume. This site is edited by Eric Deshayes, a rock critic, who published several books on rock, the underground in France.

1149:

sources that discuss their activities in relation to the journal. (Such as when some editorial boards of Elsevier journals resigned en masse, for example). --

1095:

presentation of Volume ! The RAMA is a regional network dedicated to promoting popular music in Aquitaine. It supports Volume ! and the Ed. Mélanie Seteun.

774: 677: 115: 1346:

One month after the whole debate, Volume! is indexed on two major, international, specific databases: IIMP (as of Sept. 2012) and RILM (as of Oct. 2012).

1392: 291: 693:) - this means that to publish information on their site, you submit for instance a CFP, they judge if it is relevant and so forth, then publish it. 676:

Perusing (searching) Google scholar and Google was meant to help this journal's situation on Knowledge. Using Google I found something very helpful

1407: 249: 239: 106: 86: 31: 810:

appears to give a brief description of the types of articles submitted to this publication, including that these are original research endeavors.

1213:

of a case where an editorial board did something notable and should be mentioned in an article on a journal, not a suggestion that the board of

1412: 373:

to support such kind of statements. I'll put a "welcome" template on your talk page with some links to useful guidelines and policies. --

1271:

given a search I did on July 23rd 2012. Contributors at the French Knowledge may be better able to judge its merits although there are

1218:

journals. In my above comment I have not said any of the things that you are commenting about... Please read more carefully. Thanks. --

1182:

accepted, nor have they resigned "en masse" (for that matter?). Until then, please keep ab absurdo reasoning for yourself. Thank you.

1275:] which suggests it is not significant in the French speaking world; some contributors work on both French & English versions.-- 215: 740: 679:, so please come down off the high pedestal. This link is briefly discussed below, even though it probably cannot be considered a 1402: 566: 496: 935:

Here is a call for papers dated in the month of June on Revue.org. This does give insight into the process of this publication.

1175:

http://h-net.msu.edu/cgi-bin/logbrowse.pl?trx=vx&list=H-PCAACA&month=1205&week=b&msg=L2iaZU33%2BQdQKDcGmK0%2BsA

887:

cairn.info soon, have a prestigious international editorial board etc., submit articles to the classic peer-review process etc.

1086: 1198: 1111: 287: 206: 167: 61: 562: 515:

File:Volume ! La revue des musiques populaires - 8-1 Peut-on parler de musique noire.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

492: 610: 613:), France obviously (we publish articles they reward). We organized a conference a year ago in Bordeaux (cf. here: 292:

http://www.cairn.info/resultats_recherche.php?searchTerm=%22%2C+la+revue++interdisciplinaire+Copyright+Volume+!%22

27: 316:

Hi the refs are about the state of popular music studies in France, justifying the existence of Volume… Thanks

1223: 1154: 614: 1177:) etc. You can actually, if you want to judge us seriously, check the list of our published authors here: 1219: 1150: 1134: 957: 919: 875: 830: 590: 67: 751: 1366: 1374: 1370: 1331: 1310: 1280: 1276: 1186: 1099: 1046: 49: 20: 732: 1006: 272: 214:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

114:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1347: 1300: 1190: 1103: 1072: 1014: 891: 870:

personal. Other people do try to add marginal and trivial content, while being contentious. ----

846: 649: 632: 556:

has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

486:

has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

430: 391: 351: 317: 297: 741:

http://www.mollat.com/rendez-vous/en_presence_de_philip_tagg_et_denis_constant_martin-37124.html

722:

Is it possible to find out what indexing services index this journal? Take a look at this page:

534: 464: 276: 948:" call for papers above. I am not sure what this page is. If there is any more pertaining to 1351: 1304: 1259: 1194: 1130: 1107: 1061:

the main French online catalogue of academic journals, summarizes our editorial process etc.

1018: 953: 952:

on this page perhaps someone who reads in French can find it more efficiently than me. ----

915: 895: 871: 850: 826: 653: 636: 586: 434: 413: 395: 378: 355: 340: 321: 301: 111: 1029: 286:

Here are the links to the quotes - you can see portions of the sentences (in French) here:

1322: 1247: 1079: 405: 332: 1209:

Zamuse, I think you need to read my above comment again. The Elsevier boards story is an

531:

File:Volume ! La revue des musiques populaires - 8-1 Peut-on parler de musique noire.jpg

523: 453: 445:

File:Volume ! La Reprise dans les musiques populaires.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion

98: 80: 1251: 1052: 785:) or other scholars, with at least a PhD in the subject / field treated by the article. 553: 483: 1296:

France24 never quotes ANY scholarly journal, why would you look there for information?

609:). Our publications are announced on the websites of the IASPM international, Canada ( 1386: 1263: 1001: 707: 618: 288:

http://www.cairn.info/resultats_recherche.php?searchTerm=%22%C3%A0+la+revue+Volume%22

198: 510:

The image was designed, the file was created and uploaded by members of the journal…

1255: 1243: 1082:

website. Prominent monthly newspaper on geopolitics. Belongs to the group Le Monde.

680: 370: 1092: 757:

We have been accepted by two major French and Belgian online portals: Revues.org (

611:

http://iaspm.ca/2010/08/volume-la-revue-des-musiques-populaires-la-reprise-covers/

1145:

than figureheads and so they should only be mentioned in an article if there are

1058: 985: 409: 374: 336: 1032:

mentioning the 2009 Bordeaux conference co-organized by Volume ! - another one

936: 747: 1033: 188: 182: 161: 808: 793: 1272: 1036:

mentioning the round table with Philip Tagg the day before the conference.

823: 782: 723: 626: 615:

http://www.ades.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/Appel_journee_d_etude_musiques_noires.pdf

1320:

Zamuse, the article can have 100 references and still not be notable.

211: 996: 752:

http://www.sudouest.fr/2010/04/13/musiques-de-couleur-64504-2780.php

1065: 758: 606: 296:

Those with Cairn subscriptions can easily download the articles.

1169: 733:

http://www.keithkahnharris.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/metalstudies.htm

1378: 1355: 1333: 1314: 1284: 1227: 1202: 1178: 1158: 1138: 1115: 1039: 1022: 961: 923: 899: 879: 854: 834: 697: 657: 640: 594: 570: 500: 438: 417: 399: 382: 359: 344: 325: 305: 280: 43: 15: 911:

Here is one current news item (July11, 2011) in "Le Devoir"

768:

Also one question appears to have been answered, and that is

331:

I understand that. However, as far as I see, this violates

973: 461:

File:Volume ! La Reprise dans les musiques populaires.jpeg

966: 1002:

690: 990: 815:

Indeed, the English version is below the French text.

210:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 110:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 619:http://www.cean.sciencespobordeaux.fr/lettre52.pdf 1049:newsletter mentioning the countercultures CFP. 1089:mentioning the Volume ! issues he edited etc. 8: 748:http://calenda.revues.org/nouvelle12949.html 710:and will say no more about that - thank you. 533:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at 463:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at 143:WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide 1273:low pageview counts at the French Knowledge 825:. Is this simply the editorial board? ---- 156: 75: 147:for tips on how to improve this article. 783:http://www.seteun.net/spip.php?article4 627:http://www.seteun.net/spip.php?article5 335:and does not belong in this article. -- 158: 124:Knowledge:WikiProject Academic Journals 77: 47: 559:This notification is provided by a Bot 489:This notification is provided by a Bot 127:Template:WikiProject Academic Journals 1398:WikiProject Academic Journal articles 1042:website announcing our listening CFP. 1009:in an interview with Emmanuel Parent. 792:What is "Seteun editions since 1998" 7: 204:This article is within the scope of 104:This article is within the scope of 967:IASPM 16th International Conference 696:The CFP is also on the IASPM site: 66:It is of interest to the following 822:What is the Scientific committee? 404:Yes, that is too far-fetched, see 14: 1393:C-Class Academic Journal articles 1254:, unsourced content and possible 1047:Popular Cultures Research Network 1030:Link to the ADES laboratory page 969:(June 22, 2011) Call for papers. 522: 452: 191: 181: 160: 97: 79: 48: 19: 1068:the site which hosts Revues.org 979:The professional activities of 759:http://www.openedition.org/9173 607:http://www.openedition.org/9173 529:An image used in this article, 459:An image used in this article, 244:This article has been rated as 30:on 23 July 2012. The result of 26:This article was nominated for 1408:Low-importance France articles 1258:, appearance of promotion and 600:No indeed, a scholarly journal 1: 1356:00:46, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 1246:, length of article suggests 1170:http://volume.revues.org/1637 914:. Maybe this is useful. ---- 218:and see a list of open tasks. 118:and see a list of open tasks. 107:WikiProject Academic Journals 1413:All WikiProject France pages 1159:07:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 1139:07:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 371:independent reliable sources 271:I will source, don't worry! 224:Knowledge:WikiProject France 1179:http://volume.revues.org/33 698:http://www.iaspm.net/?p=486 689:World Wide Web" (cf. here: 227:Template:WikiProject France 1429: 1238:Problems with this article 537:for the following reason: 467:for the following reason: 250:project's importance scale 1379:18:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 1334:12:07, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 1315:11:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 1285:17:58, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 1116:13:45, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 1023:14:01, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 962:04:35, 14 July 2011 (UTC) 924:03:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC) 900:10:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 880:03:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 855:23:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 835:21:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 658:20:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 641:19:57, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 621:). How much do you need? 595:06:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 571:18:29, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 501:16:58, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 439:18:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 418:13:53, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 400:13:26, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 383:17:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 360:16:57, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 345:14:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 326:14:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 306:11:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 281:02:06, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 243: 176: 138: 130:Academic Journal articles 92: 74: 1228:02:25, 16 May 2012 (UTC) 1203:23:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC) 1075:online academic journal. 993:French Knowledge Article 1403:C-Class France articles 1361:Discussion at COI board 1007:Overview of the journal 563:CommonsNotificationBot 493:CommonsNotificationBot 56:This article is rated 691:http://www.h-net.org/ 1264:conflict of interest 1085:Philippe Le Guern's 539:Copyright violations 469:Copyright violations 976:Cleo. CNRS. France. 1080:Monde Diplomatique 1073:Music and Politics 554:commons:COM:SPEEDY 484:commons:COM:SPEEDY 207:WikiProject France 62:content assessment 1256:original research 1206: 1189:comment added by 1119: 1102:comment added by 1013:A few things I - 585:notability. ---- 577: 576: 543:What should I do? 535:Wikimedia Commons 507: 506: 473:What should I do? 465:Wikimedia Commons 312:WP:SYNTH conflict 264: 263: 260: 259: 256: 255: 155: 154: 151: 150: 121:Academic Journals 112:Academic Journals 87:Academic Journals 42: 41: 1420: 1328: 1327: 1317: 1244:reliable sources 1205: 1183: 1118: 1096: 1078:A review on the 1059:Place des revues 986:Place des Revues 580:A music magazine 526: 519: 518: 456: 449: 448: 232: 231: 228: 225: 222: 201: 196: 195: 194: 185: 178: 177: 172: 164: 157: 132: 131: 128: 125: 122: 101: 94: 93: 83: 76: 59: 53: 52: 44: 23: 16: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1383: 1382: 1363: 1344: 1325: 1323: 1308: 1240: 1184: 1126: 1124:Editorial board 1097: 941:From this page 932: 908: 681:reliable source 602: 582: 517: 447: 364:No, unless the 314: 269: 230:France articles 229: 226: 223: 220: 219: 197: 192: 190: 170: 129: 126: 123: 120: 119: 60:on Knowledge's 57: 12: 11: 5: 1426: 1424: 1416: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1385: 1384: 1362: 1359: 1343: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1313:comment added 1297: 1294: 1291: 1239: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1162: 1161: 1125: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1090: 1083: 1076: 1071:A link on the 1069: 1062: 1056: 1050: 1043: 1037: 1011: 1010: 1004: 999: 994: 988: 983: 981:Gérôme Guibert 977: 970: 964: 939: 931: 928: 927: 926: 907: 904: 903: 902: 888: 884: 883: 882: 864: 863: 862: 861: 842: 839: 838: 837: 817: 816: 813: 812: 811: 802: 801: 798: 797: 796: 787: 786: 779: 778: 777: 763: 762: 755: 744: 736: 728: 727: 726: 717: 716: 713: 712: 711: 700: 694: 686: 685: 684: 671: 670: 669: 668: 661: 660: 644: 643: 629: 601: 598: 581: 578: 575: 574: 550: 547: 546: 545: 544: 527: 516: 513: 512: 511: 505: 504: 480: 477: 476: 475: 474: 457: 446: 443: 442: 441: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 387: 386: 385: 313: 310: 309: 308: 294: 268: 265: 262: 261: 258: 257: 254: 253: 246:Low-importance 242: 236: 235: 233: 216:the discussion 203: 202: 186: 174: 173: 171:Low‑importance 165: 153: 152: 149: 148: 136: 135: 133: 116:the discussion 102: 90: 89: 84: 72: 71: 65: 54: 40: 39: 32:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1425: 1414: 1411: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1388: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1360: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1341: 1335: 1332: 1330: 1329: 1319: 1318: 1316: 1312: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1295: 1292: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1265: 1262:and possible 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1237: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1220:Guillaume2303 1216: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1180: 1176: 1171: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151:Guillaume2303 1148: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1123: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1084: 1081: 1077: 1074: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1060: 1057: 1054: 1051: 1048: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1035: 1031: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1008: 1005: 1003: 1000: 998: 995: 992: 989: 987: 984: 982: 978: 975: 971: 968: 965: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 944:I found the " 943: 940: 937: 934: 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 910: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 877: 873: 868: 867: 866: 865: 858: 857: 856: 852: 848: 843: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 821: 820: 819: 818: 814: 809: 806: 805: 804: 803: 799: 794: 791: 790: 789: 788: 784: 780: 775: 771: 767: 766: 765: 764: 760: 756: 753: 749: 745: 742: 737: 734: 729: 724: 721: 720: 719: 718: 714: 709: 704: 703: 701: 699: 695: 692: 687: 682: 678: 675: 674: 673: 672: 665: 664: 663: 662: 659: 655: 651: 646: 645: 642: 638: 634: 630: 628: 624: 623: 622: 620: 616: 612: 608: 599: 597: 596: 592: 588: 579: 573: 572: 568: 564: 560: 555: 551: 549: 548: 542: 541: 540: 536: 532: 528: 525: 521: 520: 514: 509: 508: 503: 502: 498: 494: 490: 485: 481: 479: 478: 472: 471: 470: 466: 462: 458: 455: 451: 450: 444: 440: 436: 432: 427: 426: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 402: 401: 397: 393: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 367: 363: 362: 361: 357: 353: 348: 347: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 329: 328: 327: 323: 319: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 293: 289: 285: 284: 283: 282: 278: 274: 266: 251: 247: 241: 238: 237: 234: 217: 213: 209: 208: 200: 199:France portal 189: 187: 184: 180: 179: 175: 169: 166: 163: 159: 146: 145: 144: 137: 134: 117: 113: 109: 108: 103: 100: 96: 95: 91: 88: 85: 82: 78: 73: 69: 63: 55: 51: 46: 45: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1364: 1345: 1321: 1268: 1248:undue weight 1241: 1214: 1210: 1185:— Preceding 1146: 1127: 1098:— Preceding 1066:Open Edition 1012: 949: 945: 769: 603: 583: 558: 557: 538: 488: 487: 468: 365: 315: 270: 245: 205: 141: 140: 105: 68:WikiProjects 35: 1309:—Preceding 1260:advertising 1147:independent 1131:Steve Quinn 997:IF Journals 954:Steve Quinn 930:Other items 916:Steve Quinn 872:Steve Quinn 827:Steve Quinn 617:, or here: 587:Steve Quinn 1387:Categories 1371:Tomwsulcer 1277:Tomwsulcer 1252:notability 1250:, dubious 1064:Volume on 1053:Neosphères 974:Revues.org 906:News items 860:summation. 807:This page 750:, or here 290:and here: 1269:France 24 1326:Yeller21 1242:Lack of 1199:contribs 1187:unsigned 1112:contribs 1100:unsigned 406:WP:SYNTH 333:WP:SYNTH 267:Sourcing 28:deletion 1342:Indexes 1311:undated 1211:example 1025:- add: 991:Volume! 950:Volume! 946:Calenda 667:below). 273:Vvolume 248:on the 58:C-class 1348:Zamuse 1301:Zamuse 1299:Best, 1215:Volume 1191:Zamuse 1104:Zamuse 1045:Leeds 1015:Zamuse 972:About 892:Zamuse 890:Best, 847:Zamuse 746:here: 708:WP:AGF 650:Zamuse 633:Zamuse 431:Zamuse 410:Crusio 408:... -- 392:Zamuse 375:Crusio 366:source 352:Zamuse 337:Crusio 318:Zamuse 298:Zamuse 221:France 212:France 168:France 64:scale. 1040:IASPM 1375:talk 1367:here 1365:FYI 1352:talk 1305:talk 1281:talk 1224:talk 1195:talk 1155:talk 1135:talk 1108:talk 1093:RAMA 1034:here 1019:talk 958:talk 920:talk 896:talk 876:talk 851:talk 841:Yes. 831:talk 654:talk 648:you! 637:talk 591:talk 567:talk 497:talk 435:talk 414:talk 396:talk 379:talk 356:talk 341:talk 322:talk 302:talk 277:talk 139:See 36:keep 34:was 1369:.-- 1307:) 715:OK. 240:Low 1389:: 1377:) 1354:) 1324:Ol 1283:) 1226:) 1201:) 1197:• 1157:) 1137:) 1114:) 1110:• 1087:CV 1021:) 960:) 922:) 898:) 878:) 853:) 833:) 656:) 639:) 593:) 569:) 561:-- 499:) 491:-- 437:) 416:) 398:) 381:) 358:) 343:) 324:) 304:) 279:) 1373:( 1350:( 1303:( 1279:( 1222:( 1193:( 1153:( 1133:( 1106:( 1017:( 956:( 938:. 918:( 894:( 874:( 849:( 829:( 770:: 754:) 743:, 725:. 683:. 652:( 635:( 589:( 565:( 495:( 433:( 412:( 394:( 377:( 354:( 339:( 320:( 300:( 275:( 252:. 70:: 38:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.