850:
826:
812:
780:
736:
709:
699:
629:
615:
601:
569:
535:
53:
219:
307:
VHEMT and Knight appears to be used almost interchangable. I don't think having it like this is necesarily a problem, or know of any solution, it was just quite noticable. Especially when sentences within a paragraph switch between the two so frequently (e.g. when it goes from Knight says to VHEM
286:
Sorry for the delay. A few things from my first read through. All in all it reads pretty close to GA quality so I am not expecting too much extra work to be done in that regard. However a request has been made for more detail so I will make suggestions outside the GA criteria. Like all my reviews
176:
I am willing to review this article, but before I do so I want to ask a question regarding the stability. There has been a lot of recent activity here and to be quite honest the talk page is a mess to work through. Do the major editors here agree that the current version is currently stable?
370:
This might need some more explanation. What does she mean by renounce children as a symbol, "queer oppositional politics" or definition of civil order. These sound interesting, but I have no idea what they mean. Could they be expanded on ina sentenc or two, or written more clearer.
863:
Quite a bit of work has gone into this recently, but it looks good and isn't really unstable. Not sure about dividing up the the reception into criticism and positive responses, but that is more my personal preference than any requirement that I am aware of. So passing this now.
367:
Writing in the
Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Carmen Dell'Aversano notes that VHEMT seeks to renounce children as a symbol, and casts the movement as a form of "queer oppositional politics". She argues that the movement seeks to come to a new definition of "civil
244:
Also, as long as Mitch doesn't mind, I would appreciate a thorough review, GA+, if you will. I'm captivated by the idea of making this Today's
Featured Article eventually (when's earth day?) so I'd like to get started down that (long and arduous) path.
217:
Thanks for your willingness to review this
Aircorn, I really appreciate it. I made the change to the lead that Mitch Ames suggested, and I have no more changes I'm planning on making, so I think that it is stable now. Per
327:
That section also tends to start with a lot of "he says ..." sentences. Again not a major for GA, but maybe it could be mixed up a bit to make it read better. It can be tricky whe everything has to be attributed.
58:
437:
I don't think so, off the top of my head. There are a few others that support massive population reductions, but I think VHEMT is the only one that comes out for total human extinction. I thought that the
259:
I am pretty thorough as far as GA reviewers go. I treat these as collaborative efforts so feel free to ask any questions regarding any comments I make. Will have something for you to comment on soon.
137:
744:
I am assuming comes from “That’s when I realised that the best thing for the planet would be for us to phase ourselves out completely.” "Final solution" is a bit stronger than "best solution".
133:
118:
63:
391:
The paper argues that voluntary extinction is a laudable goal, believing that extinction is unavoidable and preferring voluntary extinction as the most peaceful and noble option
222:
Mitch and I have been the two most active editors over the past 5 months or so. The third most active editor made a lot of comments on the talk page, but has since retired. The
110:
91:
374:
Hmm, I honestly found her arguments a bit difficult to parse, not being an expert in postmodern queer theory myself. I took a stab at clarifying, hope it helps.
81:
442:
also promoted extinction, but now that I look, I can't see any place they are described as advocating total extinction, just mass suicide and cannibalism.
197:
I disagree with a sentence in the lead paragraph - on a matter that has been disputed before but not (IMO) resolved - but I think it can be easily fixed.
198:
126:
17:
347:
Maybe say journalist Oliver
Burkeman from The Guardian. It won't hurt to make it obvious who it is and of The Guardian doesn't sound right.
393:
Unclear sentence. Don't like the use of believing (do papers believe). Might need rewording, moving or elimanitng preferring could help.
103:
308:
says, to he says at the start of idealogy). Not important for GA, but maybe someone will be perdantic about it if you take it further.
501:
804:
507:
86:
621:
413:
Brian
Bethune writes in Maclean's that Knight's logic is "as absurd as it's unassailable". However, he doubts Knight's claim
227:
37:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
887:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
167:
742:
He later concluded that the extinction of humanity would be a final solution to the Earth's environmental problems.
541:
641:
587:
561:
878:
756:
752:
672:
653:
649:
488:
484:
473:
451:
447:
427:
423:
405:
401:
383:
379:
359:
355:
340:
336:
320:
316:
301:
273:
254:
250:
239:
235:
210:
191:
171:
439:
206:
875:
669:
470:
298:
270:
188:
161:
794:
748:
645:
549:
480:
443:
419:
397:
375:
351:
332:
312:
246:
231:
199:
Talk:Voluntary Human
Extinction Movement#"volunteers" and "supporters" in the lead paragraph
644:
of the SFGate piece: "Thompson and Knight say they were raised in large, happy families."
202:
722:
545:
511:
818:
557:
553:
865:
659:
607:
460:
288:
287:
this is a colaborative process, so feel free to question anythingg mentioned here.
260:
178:
157:
311:
Hmm, this is somewhat tricky, I tried to standardize it within paragraphs a bit.
331:
I took a stab at it, not sure if my changes were an improvement though...
415:
This however doesn't make sence as the two sentences are both critical.
518:
Sorry for the delay. A few minor points after checking the references.
479:
No problem, take your time. I've been keeping pretty busy myself.
459:
Sorry, got a bit distracted, but will get back to this soon.
434:
Any more groups outside VHEMT that support this position?
145:
114:
396:Changed the wording a bit, hope that helped.
8:
803:(images are tagged and non-free images have
230:. So I think we're ready for a review then.
41:
637:Couldn't find this in the cited source.
18:Talk:Voluntary Human Extinction Movement
72:
44:
7:
33:The following discussion is closed.
798:, where possible and appropriate.
24:
635:who was raised in a large family.
883:The discussion above is closed.
848:
831:One non-free image with rational
824:
810:
778:
734:
731:Fair representation without bias
707:
697:
627:
613:
599:
567:
533:
510:for what the criteria are, and
1:
879:11:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
757:05:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
673:11:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
654:05:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
489:16:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
474:13:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
855:Some minor issues to address
849:
825:
811:
779:
735:
708:
698:
658:Don't know how missed that.
628:
614:
600:
568:
534:
452:19:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
428:19:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
406:20:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
384:22:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
360:19:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
341:21:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
321:20:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
302:11:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
274:09:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
255:17:36, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
240:17:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
211:14:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
192:12:28, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
172:12:28, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
902:
747:I suppose it is, changed.
517:
885:Please do not modify it.
35:Please do not modify it.
523:reasonably well written
817:(appropriate use with
785:Previous issues sorted
514:for what they are not)
792:It is illustrated by
723:neutral point of view
687:broad in its coverage
440:Church of Euthanasia
805:fair use rationales
775:No edit wars, etc.
583:factually accurate
418:Good catch, done.
36:
819:suitable captions
201:has the details.
100:
99:
34:
893:
873:
852:
851:
828:
827:
814:
813:
782:
781:
738:
737:
711:
710:
701:
700:
667:
631:
630:
617:
616:
608:reliable sources
603:
602:
571:
570:
537:
536:
468:
296:
282:Initial comments
268:
186:
150:
141:
122:
54:Copyvio detector
42:
901:
900:
896:
895:
894:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
867:
720:It follows the
694:(major aspects)
661:
497:
462:
290:
284:
262:
224:Readers' Digest
180:
131:
108:
102:
96:
68:
39:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
899:
897:
882:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
606:(citations to
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
516:
515:
496:
493:
492:
491:
457:
456:
455:
454:
432:
431:
430:
410:
409:
408:
388:
387:
386:
364:
363:
362:
345:
344:
343:
325:
324:
323:
283:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
242:
226:version is in
214:
213:
151:
98:
97:
95:
94:
89:
84:
78:
75:
74:
70:
69:
67:
66:
64:External links
61:
56:
50:
47:
46:
40:
31:
30:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
898:
886:
881:
880:
877:
874:
872:
871:
854:
853:
846:
843:
842:
840:
837:
830:
829:
822:
820:
808:
806:
800:
799:
797:
796:
791:
784:
783:
776:
773:
772:
770:
766:
758:
754:
750:
746:
745:
743:
740:
739:
732:
729:
728:
726:
724:
719:
713:
712:
705:
695:
691:
690:
688:
684:
674:
671:
668:
666:
665:
657:
656:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
638:
636:
633:
632:
625:
623:
611:
609:
597:
593:
592:
590:
589:
584:
580:
573:
572:
565:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
531:
527:
526:
524:
520:
519:
513:
509:
505:
503:
499:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
476:
475:
472:
469:
467:
466:
453:
449:
445:
441:
436:
435:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
416:
414:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
348:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
329:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
309:
306:
305:
304:
303:
300:
297:
295:
294:
281:
275:
272:
269:
267:
266:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
243:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
216:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
195:
194:
193:
190:
187:
185:
184:
174:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
129:
125:
120:
116:
112:
107:
106:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
77:
76:
71:
65:
62:
60:
57:
55:
52:
51:
49:
48:
43:
38:
26:
19:
884:
869:
868:
862:
844:
838:
816:
802:
793:
774:
768:
741:
730:
721:
703:
693:
686:
663:
662:
634:
619:
605:
596:(references)
595:
586:
582:
539:
529:
522:
500:
464:
463:
458:
412:
390:
366:
292:
291:
285:
264:
263:
223:
182:
181:
175:
164:
154:
153:
146:
142:
128:Article talk
127:
123:
104:
101:
92:Instructions
32:
749:Mark Arsten
646:Mark Arsten
554:word choice
481:Mark Arsten
444:Mark Arsten
420:Mark Arsten
398:Mark Arsten
376:Mark Arsten
352:Mark Arsten
333:Mark Arsten
313:Mark Arsten
247:Mark Arsten
232:Mark Arsten
228:this thread
115:visual edit
588:verifiable
220:this chart
203:Mitch Ames
59:Authorship
45:GA toolbox
845:Pass/Fail
704:(focused)
574:excellent
495:Round two
155:Reviewer:
82:Templates
73:Reviewing
27:GA Review
640:It's on
168:contribs
87:Criteria
839:Overall
558:fiction
530:(prose)
368:order".
158:Aircorn
138:history
119:history
105:Article
876:(talk)
795:images
769:stable
767:It is
725:policy
685:It is
670:(talk)
642:page 2
581:It is
560:, and
550:layout
521:It is
504:review
471:(talk)
350:Done.
299:(talk)
271:(talk)
189:(talk)
562:lists
506:(see
147:Watch
16:<
870:corn
753:talk
664:corn
650:talk
585:and
546:lead
544:for
512:here
508:here
485:talk
465:corn
448:talk
424:talk
402:talk
380:talk
356:talk
337:talk
317:talk
293:corn
265:corn
251:talk
236:talk
207:talk
183:corn
162:talk
134:edit
111:edit
866:AIR
660:AIR
542:MoS
461:AIR
289:AIR
261:AIR
179:AIR
847::
841::
823::
815:b
809::
801:a
777::
771:.
755:)
733::
727:.
706::
702:b
696::
692:a
689:.
652:)
626::
622:OR
618:c
612::
604:b
598::
594:a
591:.
566::
556:,
552:,
548:,
538:b
532::
528:a
525:.
502:GA
487:)
450:)
426:)
404:)
382:)
358:)
339:)
319:)
253:)
238:)
209:)
170:)
136:|
117:|
113:|
821:)
807:)
751:(
648:(
624:)
620:(
610:)
564:)
540:(
483:(
446:(
422:(
400:(
378:(
354:(
335:(
315:(
249:(
234:(
205:(
165:·
160:(
143:·
140:)
132:(
124:·
121:)
109:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.