31:
203:
whom were repulsive anti-semites were regrettably correct, these "Jesus the
Nazarene" passages in the Talmud are about the only Jesus the Nazarene we know of". As long as these historical "sources" are boxed off from modern scholarship in the article it isn't a problem. Any more than the wishful denial sources being boxed off.
186:
See the autobiography by Gustav Dalman, a
Lutheran, in the Schaff Harzog encyclopedia of religion, volume 4. Dalman called Eisenmenger's work a collection of all that was "repulsive" in Christianity and not at all an accurate representation of Judaism. Eisenmenger claimed he read the Hebrew Talmud
166:
This is still misleading. It fails to note that Yeshu was a student of R. Yehoshua ibn
Perachia and traveled to Egypt with him during the persecutions by King Alexander Yannai. That firmly places this Yeshu in the first century BCE, not the first century CE, so he cannot be Jesus. The details of
202:
True, but it's still notable. The anti-semitic flavour of much 14th-18th century "study" of these Talmud references to Jesus of
Nazareth is an important part of why some modern readers will not accept modern scholarship, because modern scholarship is basically saying "these early scholars, some of
187:
but the Talmud is in Hebrew as well as
Aramaic. Because of Eisenmenger's limited education, he had to ask people to tell him things which he then warped in his book, according to Dalman. The encyclopedia is online at CCEL.
130:
Agree. "Everybody knows" means the commentor has a very limited range of knowledge and no contact with the people familiar with Talmud who reject this conclusion for good reason.
92:
The term "Yeshu" is still used as a pejorative and slander against Jesus. Everybody knows these references in the Talmud are about him. Give me a break.
188:
168:
99:
153:
134:
114:
Even though one reference is 100 years too early, and another appears to be too late? Your unbacked assertion proves something?
38:
152:
This should not be a separate section. It should be in the later section that discusses the various terms.
208:
192:
172:
157:
138:
103:
95:
72:
67:
59:
204:
119:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
47:
17:
115:
167:
his life are on
Sanhedrin 103a and 43a. They all prove he is not Jesus.
212:
196:
176:
161:
142:
123:
107:
25:
8:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
148:Yeshu ha Notsri section misleading
24:
29:
1:
162:14:02, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
143:14:02, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
124:05:13, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
108:06:11, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
229:
213:06:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
197:23:49, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
177:23:52, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
42:of past discussions.
98:comment added by
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
220:
110:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
228:
227:
223:
222:
221:
219:
218:
217:
184:
150:
93:
90:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
226:
224:
216:
215:
183:
180:
149:
146:
132:
131:
127:
126:
89:
86:
83:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
225:
214:
210:
206:
205:In ictu oculi
201:
200:
199:
198:
194:
190:
189:71.163.114.49
181:
179:
178:
174:
170:
169:71.163.114.49
164:
163:
159:
155:
147:
145:
144:
140:
136:
129:
128:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
111:
109:
105:
101:
100:69.201.173.75
97:
87:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
185:
165:
154:4.248.222.74
151:
135:4.248.222.74
133:
94:ā Preceding
91:
78:
43:
37:
182:Eisenmenger
36:This is an
88:Oh, please
18:Talk:Yeshu
79:ArchiveĀ 7
73:ArchiveĀ 6
68:ArchiveĀ 5
60:ArchiveĀ 1
96:unsigned
39:archive
16:<
209:talk
193:talk
173:talk
158:talk
139:talk
120:talk
116:Mzk1
104:talk
211:)
195:)
175:)
160:)
141:)
122:)
106:)
64:ā
207:(
191:(
171:(
156:(
137:(
118:(
102:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.