713:. We don't make the assumption that it is okay to add content to one particle because it exists on a similar article. There is no rules against excessive use of references, in fact it is strongly encouraged, due to the fact unreferenced content may be challenged and removed. Programming sections are fine so long as individual programme demostrate an level of important to the particular broadcaster (such as original programming) ... standalone lists of programmes (including acquire) generally are not.
186:
255:
440:
597:. Most of the programming guides on other television articles should be removed as well. In general these lists are indiscriminate and poorly sourced. The one exception to this is original programming, which does allow for some of these lists to exit - theses are almost always separate to the parent article. For this article there is no evidence that any of the shows being original to this network.
50:
108:
81:
245:
218:
118:
687:
cruff trivial content which has no relation with the channel page in general; Programming section is NOT "fansite nonsense"; every
Knowledge (XXG) channel page in general uses them. I strongly suggest you let the programming section be there with "Acquired tags" and remove the the few so called Facebook links but dont just blindly remove the entire section calling it
325:
21:
616:; I will just say that on entire Knowledge (XXG) almost every channel page has a programming section and most of non-originals are listed under "Acquired programming" section. You said "Most of the programming listing on other television articles should be removed as well." Should we change the way we generally write Knowledge (XXG) now?
489:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
686:
which are hardly "blog links which are considered self-published and unreliable". Also we don't particlualry source every single programming on
Knowledge (XXG); otherwise the page will become one huge gigantic balloon of references which will be twice the size of page content. Fansite details means
522:
to discuss their concerns here. I take no position on including this content or not, but there is a difference between a list of programs airing on a TV station and a programming guide for said station(featuring a list of times various programs are on). Also, NOTTVGUIDE does state that "historically
611:
Poorly sourced? The list you removed most of them were heavily sourced by reputable publications. Infact removing the list the page has become from a very well referenced to stub category page. How in world is that a constructive edit? You think if there should be another programming page for the
369:
I know nothing about Indian television, but the sections about competition, ratings and especially "future" seem a bit opinionated to me. If these are widespread opinions, they should be cited (perhaps with a reference from a cultural commentator or Indian TV critic?); otherwise, they should be
577:
are prime example of current and former programming list on
Knowledge (XXG); Infact the entire Knowledge (XXG) almost all channel page has Programming listing Either written into channel page or created as an individual page. I see no point that this particular channel page, that too so well
642:
sources, including facebook posts and blog links which are considered self-published and unreliable - therefore not reputable. Majority of the list was still unsourced, however that is not the point as sourced content does not automatically mean it belongs. The lists are of
677:
sections" Its your opinion not of
Knowledge (XXG)'s general consensus. " I don't have time to cleanup every single network article" Why target particularity this one?. Yes it has some official Facebook links but it also has many links from
334:
228:
770:
486:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with
Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
574:
655:
sections, Knowledge (XXG) is not a television fansite. I don't have time to cleanup every single network article, yours were targeted due to some other edits you tried to undo of mine.
755:
800:
339:
414:
I agree with you, but i feel "parsi90" the creator of this page should have a "say" before it's deleted/modified to suit the content. I'm adding "Gilmore Girls" to the list.
395:
I agree. I think the future and competition sections should be deleted and the ratings section should remain only if it is rephrased and cites references for the information.
561:
is being misused to remove programme listing; it refers not making the page look like "TV Schedule". Former and current programming is hardly representative of TV schedule.
765:
200:
795:
805:
775:
760:
315:
31:
361:
Why isn't
Gilmore Girls mentioned in the list of shows that Zee Cafe airs? I think it should be mentioned, cause it's a very popular show all around the world.
541:
The page that is being removed is not "a programming guide schedule" but a simple list of former and current programming. Ive stated by opinion below. Thanks.
562:
790:
305:
467:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
464:
195:
91:
523:
significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable", although a list of current programs aired doesn't necessarily seem "historic" in nature.
491:
483:
479:
456:
176:
810:
785:
277:
281:
750:
166:
495:
566:
780:
745:
268:
223:
570:
384:
61:
141:
131:
86:
710:
613:
594:
27:
644:
67:
49:
683:
688:
648:
558:
475:
447:
380:
452:
451:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
20:
501:
426:
260:
371:
718:
696:
660:
621:
602:
583:
546:
528:
375:
273:
468:
679:
439:
185:
739:
254:
123:
714:
692:
656:
617:
598:
579:
542:
524:
519:
515:
400:
276:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
272:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge (XXG) articles about
250:
113:
107:
80:
324:
722:
700:
664:
625:
606:
587:
550:
532:
504:
429:
403:
389:
244:
217:
651:
is also relevant, it is not limited to schedules. We should not have
139:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
136:
463:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
593:@JayB91 has attempted to undo the list removal on the basis of
374:; articles should reflect facts and notable, cited opinions. —
43:
15:
438:
323:
184:
575:
List of programs broadcast by
American Broadcasting Company
771:
Start-Class Indian television articles of Low-importance
612:
particular channel then I will create one. On basis of
420:
I believe that the section "Future" should be deleted.
135:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of
494:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
557:What is the point in removing Programme Listing?
280:. To improve this article, please refer to the
8:
756:Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
563:List of programs broadcast by ABC Television
484:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
435:Fair use rationale for Image:Zeecafe new.PNG
801:Low-importance Television stations articles
47:
212:
75:
766:Low-importance Indian television articles
796:Start-Class Television stations articles
806:Television stations task force articles
214:
77:
776:WikiProject Indian television articles
761:Start-Class Indian television articles
290:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Television
7:
647:nature of which is not encyclopdic.
567:List of programmes broadcast by TVNZ
266:This article is within the scope of
129:This article is within the scope of
66:It is of interest to the following
791:Low-importance television articles
335:the Television stations task force
14:
578:referenced has been singled out?
571:List of programs broadcast by NBC
151:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India
482:. Using one of the templates at
253:
243:
216:
116:
106:
79:
48:
30:on 19 April 2017. The result of
19:
811:WikiProject Television articles
786:Start-Class television articles
310:This article has been rated as
293:Template:WikiProject Television
196:the Indian television workgroup
171:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
496:Media copyright questions page
1:
751:Low-importance India articles
465:boilerplate fair use template
332:This article is supported by
193:This article is supported by
492:criteria for speedy deletion
430:09:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
404:15:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
827:
781:WikiProject India articles
746:Start-Class India articles
723:23:16, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
701:20:45, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
665:23:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
626:21:54, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
607:17:56, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
588:10:36, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
559:Knowledge (XXG):NOTTVGUIDE
551:10:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
533:10:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
476:the image description page
316:project's importance scale
177:project's importance scale
154:Template:WikiProject India
478:and edit it to include a
390:05:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
331:
309:
238:
192:
170:
101:
74:
505:11:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
457:explanation or rationale
410:RE:Neutral point of view
684:Daily News and Analysis
443:
328:
269:WikiProject Television
189:
56:This article is rated
459:as to why its use in
448:Image:Zeecafe new.PNG
442:
370:deleted. Please see
365:Neutral point of view
327:
284:for the type of work.
188:
60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
675:Acquired programming
673:"We should not have
653:Acquired programming
711:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
614:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
595:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
296:television articles
278:join the discussion
274:television programs
480:fair use rationale
444:
329:
190:
62:content assessment
388:
354:
353:
350:
349:
346:
345:
261:Television portal
211:
210:
207:
206:
132:WikiProject India
42:
41:
818:
455:but there is no
378:
298:
297:
294:
291:
288:
282:style guidelines
263:
258:
257:
247:
240:
239:
234:
231:
220:
213:
159:
158:
155:
152:
149:
126:
121:
120:
119:
110:
103:
102:
97:
94:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
826:
825:
821:
820:
819:
817:
816:
815:
736:
735:
512:
437:
412:
367:
359:
295:
292:
289:
286:
285:
259:
252:
232:
226:
156:
153:
150:
147:
146:
122:
117:
115:
95:
89:
57:
12:
11:
5:
824:
822:
814:
813:
808:
803:
798:
793:
788:
783:
778:
773:
768:
763:
758:
753:
748:
738:
737:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
704:
703:
680:Times Of India
668:
667:
645:indiscriminate
631:
630:
629:
628:
556:
554:
553:
511:
508:
502:BetacommandBot
436:
433:
423:
422:
416:
411:
408:
407:
406:
397:
396:
366:
363:
358:
355:
352:
351:
348:
347:
344:
343:
340:Low-importance
330:
320:
319:
312:Low-importance
308:
302:
301:
299:
265:
264:
248:
236:
235:
233:Low‑importance
221:
209:
208:
205:
204:
201:Low-importance
191:
181:
180:
173:Low-importance
169:
163:
162:
160:
157:India articles
128:
127:
111:
99:
98:
96:Low‑importance
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
823:
812:
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
743:
741:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
707:
706:
705:
702:
698:
694:
690:
689:WP:NOTTVGUIDE
685:
681:
676:
672:
671:
670:
669:
666:
662:
658:
654:
650:
649:WP:NOTTVGUIDE
646:
641:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
627:
623:
619:
615:
610:
609:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
591:
590:
589:
585:
581:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
552:
548:
544:
540:
537:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
521:
517:
509:
507:
506:
503:
499:
498:. Thank you.
497:
493:
487:
485:
481:
477:
474:Please go to
472:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
449:
441:
434:
432:
431:
428:
421:
418:
417:
415:
409:
405:
402:
399:
398:
394:
393:
392:
391:
386:
382:
377:
373:
364:
362:
357:Gilmore Girls
356:
341:
338:(assessed as
337:
336:
326:
322:
321:
317:
313:
307:
304:
303:
300:
283:
279:
275:
271:
270:
262:
256:
251:
249:
246:
242:
241:
237:
230:
225:
222:
219:
215:
202:
199:(assessed as
198:
197:
187:
183:
182:
178:
174:
168:
165:
164:
161:
144:
143:
138:
134:
133:
125:
114:
112:
109:
105:
104:
100:
93:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
674:
652:
639:
555:
538:
513:
510:Program list
500:
488:
473:
460:
446:
445:
424:
419:
413:
368:
360:
333:
311:
267:
194:
172:
142:project page
140:
130:
124:India portal
68:WikiProjects
35:
638:There were
376:Josiah Rowe
58:Start-class
740:Categories
287:Television
224:Television
92:Television
514:I invite
469:fair use
453:fair use
385:contribs
229:Stations
28:deletion
539:Comment
372:WP:NPOV
314:on the
175:on the
715:Ajf773
709:Again
693:JayB91
657:Ajf773
618:JayB91
599:Ajf773
580:JayB91
543:JayB91
525:331dot
520:Ajf773
516:JayB91
427:Indyan
401:Raj712
64:scale.
148:India
137:India
87:India
719:talk
697:talk
661:talk
640:some
622:talk
603:talk
584:talk
547:talk
529:talk
518:and
461:this
381:talk
36:keep
34:was
306:Low
167:Low
742::
721:)
699:)
691:.
682:,
663:)
624:)
605:)
586:)
573:,
569:,
565:,
549:)
531:)
471:.
425:--
383:•
342:).
227::
203:).
90::
717:(
695:(
659:(
620:(
601:(
582:(
545:(
527:(
387:)
379:(
318:.
179:.
145:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
