Knowledge (XXG)

Technological transitions

Source đź“ť

204:
systems that both generate the need for new innovations and ultimately produce and maintain them. More specifically, the systems that comprise the socio-technical paradigm include technology, supply networks, infrastructure, maintenance networks, regulation, cultural meaning as well as user practices and markets. As such, socio-technical transitions can be defined as the multi-dimensional shift from one socio-technical system to another involving changes in both technological and social systems that are intrinsically linked in a feedback loop. Generally speaking, socio-technical transitions are a slow process as technological innovation tends to occur incrementally along fixed trajectories due to the rigidity of economic, social, cultural, infrastructural and regulative norms. This is referred to as path dependency, creating technological 'lock-ins' which prevent innovation that disrupts the status quo. Therefore, the breakthrough and dissemination of technological innovations is dependent on more than their respective benefits, providing an insight into the complexity of the forces and multiple dimensions at play.
393:
studies they could be presented as having occurred on a different transition path to what was shown. For example, the bicycle could be considered an intermediate transport technology between the horse and the car. Judged from shorter different time-frame this could appear a transition in its own right. Determining the nature of a transition is problematic; when it started and ended, or whether one occurred in the sense of a radical innovation displacing an existing socio-technical regime. The perception of time casts doubt on whether a transition has occurred. If viewed over a long enough period even inert regimes may demonstrate radical change in the end. The MLP has also been criticised by scholars studying sustainability transitions using Social Practice Theories.
254:
rental/sharing have been trialled in many cities globally. Also, niche sustainable urban planning concepts such as compact cities, smart growth and transit-oriented development have modestly emerged into sustainably mobility discourse. However, the persistence of the automobility regime due to the general stability of the landscape has resulted in limited, small-scale implementations of these niche innovations. As such, prevailing user preference and cultural values at the landscape level appear to be a major barrier in transport system socio-technical transitions, as they stabilise the automobility regime, disallowing niche innovations to gain a foothold.
186:
problems to be solved the paradigm exerts an influence on technological change. The pattern of problem solving activity and the direction of progress is the technological trajectory. In similar fashion, Nelson and Winter (,)defined the concept of the 'technological regime' which directs technological change through the beliefs of engineers of what problems to solve. The work of the actors and organisations is the result of organisational and cognitive routines which determines search behaviour. This places boundaries and also trajectories (direction) to those boundaries.
380:. (). Current structural problems are apparent in a range of sectors. Dependency on oil is problematic in the energy sector due to availability, access and contribution to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Transportation is a major user of energy causing significant emission of GHGs. Food production will need to keep pace with an ever-growing world population while overcoming challenges presented by global warming and transportation issues. Incremental change has provided some improvements but a more radical transition is required to achieve a more sustainable future. 334:
when the process of a system shift is beginning. A breakthrough is occurring when fundamental changes are occurring in existing structures through the interplay of economic, social and cultural forces. Once the rate of change has decreased and a new balance is achieved, stabilization is said to have occurred. A full transition involves an overhaul of existing rules and change of beliefs which takes time, typically spanning at least a generation. This process can be speeded up through seismic, unforeseen events such as war or economic strife.
92:. Alongside the technological advancement, TT considers wider societal changes such as "user practices, regulation, industrial networks (supply, production, distribution), infrastructure, and symbolic meaning or culture". Hughes refers to the 'seamless web' where physical artifacts, organizations, scientific communities, and social practices combine. A technological transition occurs when there is a major shift in these socio-technical configurations. 1682: 1657: 250:
transport planners, policy makers and industry actors (e.g. car manufactures). Despite this stability, shifts in the landscape has allowed "cracks" in the regime such as traffic management policy (traffic calming, parking restrictions, etc.), diminishing policy commitment to the regime and industry actors proclaiming awareness of landscape pressures associated with climate change
25: 240:
Due to the systems approach inherent in the MLP, analysis can be approached from different disciplinary perspectives according to their respective ontologies and priorities. From an urban planning perspective, the framework could be used to pinpoint the barriers and drivers associated with low carbon
392:
Genus and Coles outlined a number of criticisms against the analysis of technological transitions, in particular when using the MLP. Empirical research on technological transitions occurring now has been limited, with the focus on historic transitions. Depending on the perspective on transition case
221:
level represents the current structures and practices characterised by dominant rules, institutions and technologies that are self-reinforcing. The socio-technical regime is dynamically stable in the sense that innovation still transpires albeit incrementally and along a predictable trajectory. This
337:
Geels proposed a similar four-phase approach which draws on the multi-level perspective (MLP) developed by Dutch scholars. Phase one sees the emergence of a novelty, born from the existing regime. Development then occurs in the niche level at phase two. As before, breakthrough then occurs at phase
231:
is defined as the "locus for radical innovations" where dedicated actors nurture the development of technological novelties. Incubated from market and regulation influences, the niche fosters innovations that differ fundamentally from the prevailing regime and usually require landscape developments
132:
The Russian economist Kondratiev proposed that economic growth operated in boom and bust cycles of approximately 50 year periods. These cycles were characterised by periods of expansion, stagnation and recession. The period of expansion is associated with the introduction of a new technology, e.g.
333:
Diffusion of an innovation is the concept of how it is picked up by society, at what rate and why. The diffusion of a technological innovation into society can be considered in distinct phases. Pre-development is the gestation period where the new technology has yet to make an impact. Take-off is
249:
This tension between stabilising and destabilising forces is mirrored in the prevailing automobility regime. The regime is stabilised by persistent investment in road projects, lifestyle norms and consumer preferences that perpetuate car use and resistance to major change by vested actors such as
226:
level is defined as the exogenous, broader contextual developments in deep-seated cultural patterns, macro-economics, macro-politics and spatial structures, potentially arising from shocks associated with wars, economic crisis, natural disaster and political upheaval. Additionally, landscapes are
185:
developed the concept of 'technical paradigms' and 'technological trajectories'. In considering how engineers work, the technical paradigm is an outlook on the technological problem, a definition of what the problems and solutions are. It charts the idea of specific progress. By identifying the
293:
Technological developments occur intertwined with societal needs, wants and uses. A technology is adopted and diffused based on this interplay between innovation and societal requirements. Co-evolution has different aspects. As well as the co-evolution of technology and society, aspects between
253:
In these contexts, niche socio-technical innovations that challenge the assumptions and norms of the regime have been birthed, mainly in the form of local policy and infrastructure initiatives on a city-scale. For example, intermodal travel in the form of bus/bike-rail integration schemes, bike
199:
Recently, the scope of academic sustainability discourse and investigative focus has broadened beyond the study of technological products, innovations and subsequent transitions. Much of the literature now examines technological artefacts and innovations through a wider scope of socio-technical
383:
Developed from the work on technological transitions is the field of transition management. Within this is an attempt to shape the direction of change complex socio-technical systems to more sustainable patterns. Whereas work on technological transitions is largely based on historic processes,
366:
Alongside external influences, internal drivers catalyse diffusion. These include economic factors such as the price performance ration. Socio-technical perspectives focus on the links between disparate social and technological elements. Following the breakthrough, the final phases see the new
203:
The technological transitions framework does acknowledge the co-evolution and mutual unfolding of societal change alongside technological innovation. However, the socio-technical transitions framework considers a more encompassing view of the interdependent links that technology maintains with
245:
and information technologies that digitise daily life (e.g. tele-commuting) destabilises the landscape and automobility regime. Conversely, the landscape level is solidified by stabilising forces such as cultural preferences for private ownership, timesaving, autonomy and privacy, as well as
200:
systems. It has been argued that this contemporary framework has emerged in response to both an increased understanding of the urgency of environmental problems and the recognition that more substantiative transitions are required across multiple interdependent systems to mitigate impacts.
212:
The multi-level perspective (MLP) is an analytical tool that attempts to deal with this complexity and resistance to change. Focussing on the dynamics of wider transitionary developments as opposed to discrete technological innovations, the MLP concerns itself with socio-technical system
375:
The study of technological transitions has an impact beyond academic interest. The transitions referred to in the literature may relate to historic processes, such as the transportation transitions studied by Geels, but system changes are required to achieve a safe transition to a
161:
Freeman and Perez proposed that each cycle consists of pervasive technologies, their production and economic structures that support them. Termed 'techno-economic paradigms', they suggest that the shift from one paradigm to another is the result of emergent new technologies.
505:
Hughes, T.P., 1987. The evolution of large technological systems. In: Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T. (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. pp.
241:
transport systems to better target policy efforts. To begin, from an urban mobility perspective, the landscape level is currently pressured by both stabilising and destabilising pressures. Namely, Peak Oil, public concern surrounding inaction towards
213:
transformations, particularly with transitions towards sustainability and resilience. As the name implies, the MLP posits three analytical and heuristic levels on which processes interact and align to result in socio-technical system transformations;
338:
three. In the parlance of the MLP the new technology, having been developed at the niche level, is in competition with the established regime. To break through and achieve wide diffusion, external factors – 'windows of opportunity' – are required.
300:
Scientific and engineering communities are central to the development of a technology, but a wide range of actors are involved in a transition. This can include organisations, policy-makers, government, NGOs, special interest groups and others.
232:
that open windows of opportunity in at the regime level. Therefore, the MLP attributes socio-technical transitions to the interaction of stabilising forces at the regime level with destabilising forces from both the landscape and niche levels.
180:
described how a paradigm shift is a wholesale shift in the basic understanding of a scientific theory. Examples in science include the change of thought from miasma to germ theory as a cause of disease. Building on this work,
804:
Geels, F., Monaghan, A., Eames, M. and Steward, F. , 2008. The feasibility of systems thinking in sustainable consumption and production policy: a report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London:
84:(TT) can best be described as a collection of theories regarding how technological innovations occur, the driving forces behind them, and how they are incorporated into society. TT draws on a number of fields, including 275:
De-alignment and Re-alignment: Weaknesses in the regime sees the advent of competing new technologies leading to a dominant model. (E.g. the automobile replacing the horse as the primary means of land transport).
137:
had considered that two cycles had occurred in the nineteenth century and third was beginning at the turn of the twentieth. Modern writers, such as Freeman and Perez outlined five cycles in the modern age:
565:
Freeman, C. and Perez, C., 1988. Structural crisis of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour in Dosi et al Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Frances Pinter. pp. 38-66.
884: 120:
placed the emphasis on non-economic forces as the driver for growth. The human actor, the entrepreneur is seen as the cause of economic development which occurs as a cyclical process.
246:
car-favouring urban fabric and infrastructure. This is further enhanced by universal pressures of globalisation which presupposes urban mobility to increase flows of goods and people.
325:
The rate of change will vary over time. For example, the pace of change may be slow at the gestation period (at the niche level) but much more rapid when a breakthrough is occurring.
1690: 544:
Schumpeter, T., 1934. The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press
353:
Problems external to the system. Such 'problems' are often determined by pressure groups and require wider societal or political backing. An example is environmental concerns.
169:, authors such as Moody and Nogrady have suggested that a new cycle is emerging from the old, centred on the use of sustainable technologies in a resource depleted world. 1700: 1695: 496:
Geels, F. W., 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case study. Research Policy 31 pp. 257-1273
847:
Rip, A. and R. Kemp., 1998. Technological change. In S. Rayner and E. Malone (eds.) Human Choices and Climate Change, Vol. 2, 327-399. Battelle, Columbus,Ohio.
877: 856:
Shove E, Walker G, 2007, "CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management" Environment and Planning A 39(4) 763-770
1017: 262:
The nature of transitions varies and the differing qualities result in multiple pathways occurring. Geels and Schot defined five transition paths:
350:
Internal technical problems in the existing regime. Those that cannot be solved by refinement of existing technologies act as a driver for the new.
1723: 1685: 870: 838:
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R. and van Asselt, M. 2001. More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3 (1) pp. 15–31.
817:
Genus , A., and Coles, A-M., 2008. Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy. 37 (9) pp. 1436-1445
468: 1378: 1092: 515:
Fleck, J., 1993. 'Configurations: Crystallizing Contingency', The International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 3, pp. 15-36
1642: 432: 166: 1087: 1080: 1063: 942: 932: 914: 68: 35: 272:
Technological substitution: An incumbent technology is replaced by a radical innovation resulting in a new socio-technical regime.
1314: 1423: 417: 893: 227:
beyond the direct influence of actors, yet stimulate and exert pressure on them at the regime and niche levels. Finally, the
1728: 313:
Complete system-change takes time and can be decades in the making. Case studies show them to be between 40 and 90 years.
1610: 1440: 1368: 1068: 997: 795:
Geels, F.W. and Schot, J.W., 2007, 'Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , Research Policy, 36 (3), pp.399-417
574:
Moody, J.B., and Nogrady, B., 2011. The Sixth Wave: How to Succeed in a Resource-Limited World. New York: Random House
50: 1418: 46: 1668: 1625: 1620: 1595: 1500: 1495: 242: 142: 1055: 1505: 1408: 1002: 427: 278:
Re-configuration: When multiple, interlinked technologies are replaced by a similarly linked alternative set.
1525: 1353: 1304: 610:
Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge (MA); Bellknap Press.
346:
A number of possible circumstances can act as windows of opportunity for the diffusion of new technologies:
601:
Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1977. In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy 6 (1) pp. 36-76
592:
Dosi, G., 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy 11 (3) pp. 147-162.
583:
Kuhn, T., 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago; London : University of Chicago Press
1535: 1520: 1480: 1252: 1075: 402: 269:
Transformation: A socio-technical regime that changes without the emergence of a monopolising technology.
105: 89: 535:
Geels, F.W., 2005. Technological transitions and system innovations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
1632: 1600: 1575: 1460: 1413: 1309: 1287: 1277: 1262: 1202: 1189: 1162: 1027: 992: 949: 356:
Changing user preferences. Opportunities are presented if existing technologies cannot meet user needs.
222:
makes the regime 'locked-in' and resistant to both technological and social transitions. Secondly, the
1547: 1490: 1393: 1373: 1331: 1247: 1242: 1217: 1142: 909: 412: 109: 1540: 1530: 1388: 1358: 1282: 1267: 1227: 1222: 1147: 1032: 1656: 1585: 1455: 1257: 1157: 1152: 937: 377: 101: 85: 307:
As shown in the MLP, transitions occur through the interplay of processes at different levels.
1673: 1637: 1272: 1207: 1177: 474: 464: 422: 1590: 1565: 1465: 1326: 1321: 1102: 1605: 1450: 1428: 1197: 1112: 1097: 407: 1663: 1615: 1570: 1363: 1299: 1212: 1172: 1012: 972: 1717: 1475: 1445: 1383: 1184: 1132: 1127: 1037: 182: 108:. The focus of evolutionary economics is on economic change, but as a driver of this 384:
proponents of transition management seek to actively steer transitions in progress.
1435: 1294: 1232: 967: 862: 1470: 1167: 1137: 1122: 987: 982: 177: 16:
Describes how technological innovations occur and are incorporated into society
1403: 1398: 1343: 1007: 977: 959: 319:
For a true transition to occur the technology has to be a radical innovation.
134: 121: 113: 478: 362:
Complementary technology. The availability of which may enable a breakthrough
1580: 1047: 1022: 901: 124:
proposed that radical innovations were the catalyst for Kondratiev cycles.
287:
Six characteristics of technological transitions have been identified.,
100:
Work on technological transitions draws on a number of fields including
924: 359:
Strategic advantage. Competition with rivals may necessitate innovation
215:
landscape (macro-level), regimes (meso-level) and niches (micro-level)
1557: 53:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. 866: 133:
steam power or the microprocessor. At the time of publication,
18: 680: 678: 294:
science, technology, users and culture have been considered.
266:
Reproduction: Ongoing change occurring in the regime level.
720:(Kemp, Schot, and Hoogma 1998, Twomey and Gaziulusoy 2014) 190:
Multi-level perspective (MLP) on technological transitions
154:
Oil, Mass Production and the Consumer Society (1930–1980)
148:
Victorian Prosperity: Age of steam and Rail (1830–1880)
42: 291:
Transitions are co-evolutionary and multi-dimensional
729:(Geels 2018, Geels 2005, Twomey and Gaziulusoy 2014) 553:
Kondratiev, N., 1925. Major Economic Cycles. Moscow.
1556: 1342: 1111: 1046: 958: 923: 900: 173:Technological paradigms, trajectories and regimes 711:(Geels 2010, 2018, Twomey and Gaziulusoy 2014) 112:has been considered in the literature. Joseph 878: 773: 771: 769: 767: 765: 755: 753: 668: 666: 620: 618: 616: 8: 283:Characteristics of technological transitions 885: 871: 863: 834: 832: 561: 559: 531: 529: 527: 525: 523: 521: 69:Learn how and when to remove this message 813: 811: 702:(Twomey and Gaziulusoy 2014, Geels 2018) 693:(Geels 2010, Twomey and Gaziulusoy 2014) 672:(Geels 2005, Twomey and Gaziulusoy 2014) 492: 490: 488: 454: 452: 450: 448: 444: 208:Multi-level perspective (MLP) framework 195:Socio-technical systems and transitions 759:(Geels 2012, Moradi and Vagnoni 2018) 236:MLP application - automobility regime 7: 305:Transitions occur at multiple levels 1379:Digital media use and mental health 1093:Sociology of the history of science 311:Transitions are a long-term process 433:Transition Management (Governance) 14: 1088:Sociology of scientific ignorance 933:History and philosophy of science 915:Economics of scientific knowledge 463:. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis. 1681: 1680: 1655: 23: 418:Technological innovation system 1724:Science and technology studies 894:Science and technology studies 367:technology supersede the old. 118:Theory of Economic Development 1: 1441:Normalization process theory 998:Philosophy of social science 684:(Twomey and Gaziulusoy 2014) 329:Diffusion: transition phases 157:The Information Age (1980-?) 151:The Age of Steel (1880–1930) 49:the claims made and adding 1745: 1064:construction of technology 104:, technology studies, and 88:, technology studies, and 1651: 1596:Politicization of science 747:(Moradi and Vagnoni 2018) 298:Multi-actors are involved 243:climate change mitigation 143:The Industrial Revolution 82:Technological transitions 1003:Philosophy of technology 738:(Geels 2010, Geels 2005) 660:(Geels 2018, Geels 2005) 461:Environmental Governance 428:Technological revolution 317:Transitions are radical 1076:Sociology of knowledge 403:Evolutionary economics 342:Windows of opportunity 167:recent economic crisis 106:evolutionary economics 90:evolutionary economics 1643:Transition management 1633:Technology assessment 1601:Regulation of science 1576:Evidence-based policy 1461:Sociotechnical system 1310:Traditional knowledge 1190:Psychology of science 1163:Mapping controversies 1069:shaping of technology 1028:Social constructivism 993:Philosophy of science 950:History of technology 459:Evans, J. P. (2011). 1729:Technological change 1548:Women in engineering 1394:Financial technology 1374:Digital anthropology 1143:Criticism of science 1056:Actor–network theory 1018:Religion and science 910:Economics of science 413:Technological change 323:Change is Non-linear 110:technological change 1389:Engineering studies 1359:Cyborg anthropology 1148:Demarcation problem 1033:Social epistemology 1669:History of science 1586:Funding of science 1456:Skunkworks project 1153:Double hermeneutic 938:History of science 651:(Geels 2005, 2010) 378:low-carbon economy 371:Societal relevance 102:history of science 86:history of science 34:possibly contains 1711: 1710: 1638:Technology policy 1369:Dematerialization 1178:black swan events 470:978-0-203-15567-7 423:Technology policy 116:, in his classic 79: 78: 71: 36:original research 1736: 1684: 1683: 1659: 1611:Right to science 1591:Horizon scanning 1566:Academic freedom 1466:Technical change 1327:Women in science 1322:Unity of science 1103:Strong programme 887: 880: 873: 864: 857: 854: 848: 845: 839: 836: 827: 824: 818: 815: 806: 802: 796: 793: 787: 784: 778: 775: 760: 757: 748: 745: 739: 736: 730: 727: 721: 718: 712: 709: 703: 700: 694: 691: 685: 682: 673: 670: 661: 658: 652: 649: 643: 640: 634: 631: 625: 622: 611: 608: 602: 599: 593: 590: 584: 581: 575: 572: 566: 563: 554: 551: 545: 542: 536: 533: 516: 513: 507: 503: 497: 494: 483: 482: 456: 258:Transition paths 128:Long wave theory 74: 67: 63: 60: 54: 51:inline citations 27: 26: 19: 1744: 1743: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1707: 1647: 1606:Research ethics 1552: 1451:Reverse salient 1345: 1338: 1114: 1107: 1098:Sociotechnology 1042: 954: 919: 896: 891: 861: 860: 855: 851: 846: 842: 837: 830: 825: 821: 816: 809: 803: 799: 794: 790: 785: 781: 776: 763: 758: 751: 746: 742: 737: 733: 728: 724: 719: 715: 710: 706: 701: 697: 692: 688: 683: 676: 671: 664: 659: 655: 650: 646: 641: 637: 632: 628: 623: 614: 609: 605: 600: 596: 591: 587: 582: 578: 573: 569: 564: 557: 552: 548: 543: 539: 534: 519: 514: 510: 504: 500: 495: 486: 471: 458: 457: 446: 441: 408:Kondratiev wave 399: 390: 373: 344: 331: 285: 260: 238: 217:. Firstly, the 210: 197: 192: 175: 130: 98: 75: 64: 58: 55: 40: 28: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1742: 1740: 1732: 1731: 1726: 1716: 1715: 1709: 1708: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1698: 1693: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1671: 1666: 1652: 1649: 1648: 1646: 1645: 1640: 1635: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1623: 1616:Science policy 1613: 1608: 1603: 1598: 1593: 1588: 1583: 1578: 1573: 1571:Digital divide 1568: 1562: 1560: 1554: 1553: 1551: 1550: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1528: 1523: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1508: 1503: 1498: 1493: 1487:Technological 1485: 1484: 1483: 1473: 1468: 1463: 1458: 1453: 1448: 1443: 1438: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1426: 1421: 1416: 1411: 1401: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1376: 1371: 1366: 1364:Design studies 1361: 1356: 1350: 1348: 1340: 1339: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1324: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1307: 1302: 1300:Scientometrics 1297: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1275: 1270: 1265: 1260: 1255: 1250: 1245: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1205: 1200: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1173:Paradigm shift 1170: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1145: 1140: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1119: 1117: 1109: 1108: 1106: 1105: 1100: 1095: 1090: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1066: 1058: 1052: 1050: 1044: 1043: 1041: 1040: 1035: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1015: 1013:Postpositivism 1010: 1005: 1000: 995: 990: 985: 980: 975: 973:Antipositivism 970: 964: 962: 956: 955: 953: 952: 947: 946: 945: 943:and technology 935: 929: 927: 921: 920: 918: 917: 912: 906: 904: 898: 897: 892: 890: 889: 882: 875: 867: 859: 858: 849: 840: 828: 826:Everett (1962) 819: 807: 797: 788: 779: 761: 749: 740: 731: 722: 713: 704: 695: 686: 674: 662: 653: 644: 635: 626: 612: 603: 594: 585: 576: 567: 555: 546: 537: 517: 508: 498: 484: 469: 443: 442: 440: 437: 436: 435: 430: 425: 420: 415: 410: 405: 398: 395: 389: 386: 372: 369: 364: 363: 360: 357: 354: 351: 343: 340: 330: 327: 284: 281: 280: 279: 276: 273: 270: 267: 259: 256: 237: 234: 209: 206: 196: 193: 191: 188: 174: 171: 165:Following the 159: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 129: 126: 97: 94: 77: 76: 31: 29: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1741: 1730: 1727: 1725: 1722: 1721: 1719: 1702: 1699: 1697: 1694: 1692: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1679: 1675: 1672: 1670: 1667: 1665: 1662: 1661: 1658: 1654: 1653: 1650: 1644: 1641: 1639: 1636: 1634: 1631: 1627: 1624: 1622: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1614: 1612: 1609: 1607: 1604: 1602: 1599: 1597: 1594: 1592: 1589: 1587: 1584: 1582: 1579: 1577: 1574: 1572: 1569: 1567: 1564: 1563: 1561: 1559: 1555: 1549: 1546: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1529: 1527: 1524: 1522: 1519: 1518: 1516: 1512: 1509: 1507: 1504: 1502: 1499: 1497: 1494: 1492: 1489: 1488: 1486: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476:Technoscience 1474: 1472: 1469: 1467: 1464: 1462: 1459: 1457: 1454: 1452: 1449: 1447: 1446:Media studies 1444: 1442: 1439: 1437: 1434: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1387: 1385: 1384:Early adopter 1382: 1380: 1377: 1375: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1354:Co-production 1352: 1351: 1349: 1347: 1341: 1333: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1306: 1303: 1301: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1286: 1284: 1281: 1279: 1276: 1274: 1271: 1269: 1266: 1264: 1261: 1259: 1256: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1246: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1238: 1234: 1231: 1229: 1226: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1203:communication 1201: 1199: 1196: 1195: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1185:Pseudoscience 1183: 1179: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1133:Boundary-work 1131: 1129: 1128:Bibliometrics 1126: 1124: 1121: 1120: 1118: 1116: 1110: 1104: 1101: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1091: 1089: 1086: 1082: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1074: 1070: 1067: 1065: 1062: 1061: 1059: 1057: 1054: 1053: 1051: 1049: 1045: 1039: 1038:Transhumanism 1036: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1009: 1006: 1004: 1001: 999: 996: 994: 991: 989: 986: 984: 981: 979: 976: 974: 971: 969: 966: 965: 963: 961: 957: 951: 948: 944: 941: 940: 939: 936: 934: 931: 930: 928: 926: 922: 916: 913: 911: 908: 907: 905: 903: 899: 895: 888: 883: 881: 876: 874: 869: 868: 865: 853: 850: 844: 841: 835: 833: 829: 823: 820: 814: 812: 808: 801: 798: 792: 789: 786:(Geels 2012). 783: 780: 774: 772: 770: 768: 766: 762: 756: 754: 750: 744: 741: 735: 732: 726: 723: 717: 714: 708: 705: 699: 696: 690: 687: 681: 679: 675: 669: 667: 663: 657: 654: 648: 645: 639: 636: 630: 627: 621: 619: 617: 613: 607: 604: 598: 595: 589: 586: 580: 577: 571: 568: 562: 560: 556: 550: 547: 541: 538: 532: 530: 528: 526: 524: 522: 518: 512: 509: 502: 499: 493: 491: 489: 485: 480: 476: 472: 466: 462: 455: 453: 451: 449: 445: 438: 434: 431: 429: 426: 424: 421: 419: 416: 414: 411: 409: 406: 404: 401: 400: 396: 394: 387: 385: 381: 379: 370: 368: 361: 358: 355: 352: 349: 348: 347: 341: 339: 335: 328: 326: 324: 320: 318: 314: 312: 308: 306: 302: 299: 295: 292: 288: 282: 277: 274: 271: 268: 265: 264: 263: 257: 255: 251: 247: 244: 235: 233: 230: 225: 220: 216: 207: 205: 201: 194: 189: 187: 184: 183:Giovanni Dosi 179: 172: 170: 168: 163: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 140: 139: 136: 127: 125: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 95: 93: 91: 87: 83: 73: 70: 62: 52: 48: 44: 38: 37: 32:This article 30: 21: 20: 1691:Associations 1526:criticism of 1510: 1436:Leapfrogging 1419:linear model 1305:Team science 1295:Scientocracy 1218:Neo-colonial 968:Anthropocene 852: 843: 822: 800: 791: 782: 777:(Geels 2012) 743: 734: 725: 716: 707: 698: 689: 656: 647: 642:(Geels 2010) 638: 633:(Geels 2018) 629: 624:(Geels 2005) 606: 597: 588: 579: 570: 549: 540: 511: 501: 460: 391: 382: 374: 365: 345: 336: 332: 322: 321: 316: 315: 310: 309: 304: 303: 297: 296: 290: 289: 286: 261: 252: 248: 239: 228: 223: 218: 214: 211: 202: 198: 176: 164: 160: 131: 117: 99: 81: 80: 65: 59:October 2022 56: 33: 1536:theories of 1521:and society 1517:Technology 1511:transitions 1501:determinism 1496:convergence 1471:Technocracy 1253:controversy 1239:Scientific 1223:post-normal 1168:Metascience 1138:Consilience 1123:Antiscience 988:Neo-Luddism 983:Fuzzy logic 178:Thomas Kuhn 145:(1770–1830) 1718:Categories 1674:Technology 1626:science of 1621:history of 1506:revolution 1414:disruptive 1404:Innovation 1399:Hype cycle 1344:Technology 1315:ecological 1288:skepticism 1278:misconduct 1263:enterprise 1081:scientific 1008:Positivism 978:Empiricism 960:Philosophy 439:References 388:Criticisms 135:Kondratiev 122:Schumpeter 114:Schumpeter 43:improve it 1581:Factor 10 1409:diffusion 1248:consensus 1243:community 1208:education 1048:Sociology 1023:Scientism 902:Economics 479:798531922 224:landscape 47:verifying 1701:Scholars 1696:Journals 1686:Category 1660:Portals 1541:transfer 1531:dynamics 1481:feminist 1283:priority 1268:literacy 1228:rhetoric 1194:Science 1158:Logology 397:See also 1664:Science 1346:studies 1258:dissent 1198:citizen 1115:studies 1113:Science 1060:Social 925:History 96:Origins 41:Please 1558:Policy 1491:change 1424:system 1273:method 1213:normal 805:DEFRA. 477:  467:  219:regime 506:51-82 229:niche 1429:user 1332:STEM 1233:wars 475:OCLC 465:ISBN 45:by 1720:: 831:^ 810:^ 764:^ 752:^ 677:^ 665:^ 615:^ 558:^ 520:^ 487:^ 473:. 447:^ 886:e 879:t 872:v 481:. 72:) 66:( 61:) 57:( 39:.

Index

original research
improve it
verifying
inline citations
Learn how and when to remove this message
history of science
evolutionary economics
history of science
evolutionary economics
technological change
Schumpeter
Schumpeter
Kondratiev
The Industrial Revolution
recent economic crisis
Thomas Kuhn
Giovanni Dosi
climate change mitigation
low-carbon economy
Evolutionary economics
Kondratiev wave
Technological change
Technological innovation system
Technology policy
Technological revolution
Transition Management (Governance)



Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑