338:
561:
330:
308:
288:
277:
248:
237:
362:
565:
statement, including both legal and academic statements, so I'm happy that the statement is accurate. Szmenderowiecki's statement is valid though, so I have added several cites to the passage in question. I see no other concerns above, and I think ALT0 is punchy enough on its own, so I see no reason to hold this up further.
424:
HI Skdb, thanks for reviewing the article. However, I'm not sure about ALT2 and ALT3. For ALT2, the sources would support "cause" more than "vector". The reason why Huq identifies the
Supreme Court as a vector rather than a cause if voting rights (eg) were consistently upheld on the state level than
506:
is an omission. We may find sources to find out whether
Democrats have been gerrymandering to get unfair advantage alone or as a reaction to the Republicans' gerrymandering (which was definitely made on a larger scale), fearing an imbalance in the representation of the federal House, but Democrats
446:
Comment: IMHO subjective topics be attributed to some one/ source in the sentence itself or have some system of star mark and @ end of main page DYK mention likely hood of subjectivity and suggestion to refer to related attributions in the article. I am not limiting my suggestion for this article
564:
After 15 days, I see no new suggestions for alternate hooks. I share the concern about the more politically charged ones, although I'm sure they would improve viewership - but it seems ALT0 will do just fine on its own. Assuming ALT0, I did a bit of poking about and found ample support for the
93:
365:
Within the spirit of the 7-day newness rule. Very well-sourced to academic literature, which is good given the controversial topic. No copyright concerns. I think we could justifiably explore some other possible hooks, such as:
425:
federal protections might not be necessary to prevent democratic backsliding. In terms of ALT3, the studies measure support for democratic/authoritarian norms rather than democratic backsliding per se. (
518:
I also feel that, if possible, it's better to supplement the "has been cited" with more than one author. The nom has done a good job assembling sources but I think we need more of these in order to link
538:
and probably elsewhere. As for partisan gerrymandering, if there is any RS that covers
Democratic gerrymandering as a form of backsliding it could be included but I'm not aware of any such source. (
193:
523:
in general with democratic backsliding, or the
Supreme Court specifically. This shouldn't be really a hard task given that criticism of the Supreme Court is on the rise.
36:
40:
88:
585:
399:
383:
179:
164:
535:
488:
534:
It is not just Huq making this argument with regard to the hook fact, a similar argument is made by
Kaufman & Haggard 2018 and also
503:
159:
17:
294:
378:
498:
A few notes about the article: when speaking of "partisan gerrymandering of electoral districts", I think that not mentioning
302:
499:
44:
543:
463:
430:
271:
484:
479:
For a claim that seems bound to spark outrage, the name of the cited scholar should probably be attributed inline.
143:
570:
528:
324:
242:
231:
83:
298:
113:
509:
480:
118:
566:
524:
177:: ... that the United States has only been a democracy since the mid-twentieth century, and is now
520:
374:
103:
282:
539:
459:
452:
426:
207:
394:
65:
579:
492:
98:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
458:
I wouldn't call it subjective because there are objective measures of democracy (
548:
468:
449: Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge'
448:
435:
203:
560:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
361:
409:
123:
61:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
397:
with high levels of racial prejudice are more likely to support
264:
Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
148:
257:
217:
108:
194:Template:Did you know nominations/Judita Nagyová ‎
513:is also in order wrt Roberts Court jurisprudence.
507:aren't blameless in that respect. A mention of
210:). Self-nominated at 04:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC).
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
384:democratic backsliding in the United States
165:democratic backsliding in the United States
135:Democratic backsliding in the United States
71:
74:
224:Article is new enough and long enough
7:
586:Passed DYK nominations from May 2022
24:
185:Source: Jardina & Mickey 2022
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
559:
360:
336:
328:
306:
286:
275:
246:
235:
68:) 14:05, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
381:have been cited as a vector of
32:Please do not modify this page.
162:has been cited as a vector of
1:
573:) 12:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
531:) 09:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
455:) 08:24, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
343:
37:this nomination's talk page
602:
495:) 07:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
373:... that the white-ethnic
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
554:18:10, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
474:16:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
441:19:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
421:19:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
41:the article's talk page
400:democratic backsliding
510:Rucho v. Common Cause
379:U.S. Republican Party
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
295:copyright violations
114:Reviewers' template
500:Maryland, New York
303:close paraphrasing
521:judicial activism
419:
407:
375:identity politics
354:
353:
319:Hook eligibility:
316:
315:
272:Adequate sourcing
256:
255:
211:
186:
171:
132:
131:
593:
563:
551:
481:theleekycauldron
471:
438:
420:
417:
416:
414:
405:
364:
344:
340:
339:
332:
331:
310:
309:
290:
289:
279:
278:
258:
250:
249:
239:
238:
218:
201:
184:
170:Source: Huq 2022
169:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
601:
600:
596:
595:
594:
592:
591:
590:
576:
575:
574:
567:Maury Markowitz
549:
525:Szmenderowiecki
469:
436:
410:
408:
404:
395:white Americans
337:
329:
307:
287:
276:
247:
236:
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
599:
597:
589:
588:
578:
577:
558:
557:
556:
555:
515:
514:
496:
477:
476:
475:
443:
442:
422:
406:{{u|
388:
352:
351:
342:
341:
333:
314:
313:
312:
311:
291:
280:
266:
265:
254:
253:
252:
251:
240:
226:
225:
216:
215:
199:
198:
197:
196:
187:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
598:
587:
584:
583:
581:
572:
568:
562:
553:
552:
545:
541:
537:
533:
532:
530:
526:
522:
517:
516:
512:
511:
505:
501:
497:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
473:
472:
465:
461:
457:
456:
454:
450:
445:
444:
440:
439:
432:
428:
423:
415:
413:
402:
401:
396:
392:
389:
386:
385:
380:
376:
372:
369:
368:
367:
363:
358:
349:
346:
345:
335:Interesting:
334:
326:
323:
322:
321:
320:
304:
300:
296:
292:
284:
281:
273:
270:
269:
268:
267:
263:
260:
259:
244:
241:
233:
230:
229:
228:
227:
223:
220:
219:
214:
213:
212:
209:
205:
195:
191:
188:
182:
181:
176:
173:
172:
167:
166:
161:
160:Supreme Court
158:... that the
157:
156:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
547:
508:
467:
434:
411:
398:
390:
382:
370:
356:
355:
347:
318:
317:
261:
221:
200:
189:
178:
174:
163:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
243:Long enough
202:Created by
180:backsliding
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
299:plagiarism
232:New enough
393:... that
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
580:Category
504:Illinois
489:contribs
350:: Done.
293:Free of
222:General:
190:Reviewed
58:promoted
542:·
491:) (she/
462:·
447:only
429:·
418:}}
377:of the
357:Overall
283:Neutral
262:Policy:
550:buidhe
470:buidhe
437:buidhe
301:, and
204:Buidhe
325:Cited
16:<
571:talk
536:here
529:talk
493:they
485:talk
453:talk
412:Sdkb
391:ALT3
371:ALT2
208:talk
175:ALT1
66:talk
62:SL93
502:or
348:QPQ
60:by
43:or
582::
546:)
487:•
466:)
433:)
403:?
359::
327::
305::
297:,
285::
274::
245::
234::
192::
183:?
168:?
139:(
39:,
569:(
544:c
540:t
527:(
483:(
464:c
460:t
451:(
431:c
427:t
387:?
206:(
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.