174:
221:
sourced to
Bahrick's article. Any claim about prominence needs a secondary source, and one could argue that secondary sourcing is necessary for a lot more here: that a theory is worthwhile mentioning is in fact what needs to be established with an outside source. I applaud the Davidson students for having tackled this, but if it is to advertise Knowledge on the front page it will need work.
158:
205:
Maybe, but it needs serious MOS editing--there are inline URLs even in the lead; sections are done with bold print, not with headings; headings themselves have incorrect capitalization; there are punctuation errors (missing after dates)... I also see what looks like OR: see, for instance, the end of
220:
What I thought were external links were in fact wikilinks done externally--this needs to be corrected. But I see more problems: the first main section claims "The most prominent method for testing and proving the encoding specificity principle was created by Harry P. Bahrick"--and the statement is
232:
MOS issues, especially relatively trivial ones like bold section headings and inline external links, are not an appropriate reason to reject an article. First of all, they are so easy to fix; secondly, and most to the point, the DYK criteria do not include "MOS compliance". Remember, this is not
206:
the section called "Encoding
Specificity and Advertising". In fact, the entire article reads like an essay, which led me to suspect what I indeed found confirmed on the talk page: an educational assignment.
235:
On the other hand, if there actually are OR and referencing issues, that is more serious. I have noticed these problems with most school assignments I see (not specifically this class).
270:
36:
40:
17:
98:
57:
237:
190:
208:
The article needs a good scrubbing by someone familiar with the MOS and a good revision for a more encyclopedic style.
44:
124:
81:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
140:
132:
182:
166:
120:
56:
after 27 days. The article's contributors have failed to respond to the concerns raised below about
61:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
136:
128:
246:
226:
213:
199:
178:
162:
65:
102:
suggests students match study and testing environments for the best recall of information?
264:
173:
222:
209:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
157:
86:
161:- Hook, source are fine. Expansion: ~4.2x(21k/4k).
8:
271:Failed DYK nominations from October 2011
188:This one might be close enough to IAR.
7:
112:: improved as part of class project
24:
143:) at 18:48, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
18:Template:Did you know nominations
172:
156:
68:) 01:26, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
229:) 20:46, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
202:) 01:22, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
185:) 00:02, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
249:) 15:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
216:) 20:39, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
169:) 13:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
99:encoding specificity principle
73:Encoding specificity principle
1:
236:
189:
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
287:
32:Please do not modify it.
41:the article's talk page
177:-5x expansion not met.
144:
135:). Nominated by
58:original research
278:
241:
194:
176:
160:
121:Margaret Cookson
119:5x expanded by
118:
34:
286:
285:
281:
280:
279:
277:
276:
275:
261:
260:
259:
239:
192:
93:
91:
87:Article history
75:
69:
52:The result was
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
284:
282:
274:
273:
263:
262:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
218:
170:
153:
152:
151:
150:
116:
115:
114:
113:
104:
103:
90:
89:
84:
82:Back to T:TDYK
78:
76:
74:
71:
60:and sourcing.
50:
49:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
283:
272:
269:
268:
266:
250:
248:
244:
243:
231:
230:
228:
224:
219:
217:
215:
211:
204:
203:
201:
197:
196:
187:
186:
184:
180:
175:
171:
168:
164:
159:
155:
154:
149:
148:
147:
146:
145:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
111:
108:
107:
106:
105:
101:
100:
96:... that the
95:
94:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
72:
70:
67:
63:
59:
55:
48:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
234:
207:
137:Greta Munger
129:DrewBlundell
117:
109:
97:
54:not promoted
53:
51:
31:
28:
179:Smallman12q
163:Smallman12q
265:Category
245: (
198: (
110:Comment
223:Drmies
210:Drmies
62:Cunard
16:<
247:talk
242:anaɢ
227:talk
214:talk
200:talk
195:anaɢ
183:talk
167:talk
141:talk
133:talk
125:talk
66:talk
233:GA.
127:),
43:or
267::
77:(
39:,
240:ʨ
238:r
225:(
212:(
193:ʨ
191:r
181:(
165:(
139:(
131:(
123:(
92:)
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
