Knowledge (XXG)

Template talk:2021 AFC Champions League group tables

Source 📝

22: 71: 53: 81: 141: 183:
points. Al-Nassr in Group D already has 8 points. For group C, the minimum points for their runner-ups are also 8 points, because Al-Ahli and Esteghlal who currently are both on 7 points, will meet each other. The conclusion is Pakhtakor can still finish second but they won't qualify for knockout stage, so they are already eliminated.
205:
If Esteghlal lose to Al-Ahli, then the group C tables would look like this: Al-Ahli 10, Al-Duhail 8, Esteghlal 7, Al-Shorta 0. You can see here that Al-Duhail which become the runner-up already has 8 points. So, even if Pakhtakor win big and Esteghlal lose both matches, Pakhtakor still can't qualify
182:
You're right that Pakhtakor and Tractor are tied at their head-to-head records, so both of them can finish second. If Pakhtakor finish second, their points will be 7. But are 7 points enough to qualify for the knockout stage? Let's have a look at other groups. Al-Wahda in Group E already has 10
281:
please {{ping}} me when you reply, so I can see that you've replied. It's not about whether it matters to me or not, it's if it's needed. If 1/2 matches are completed, leave that there, but if all matches are complete, there is absolutely no reason to have the 1/2 matches completed there.
259:
who usually do most international tournament updates. I even made deals with him for the 2018 FIFA men's and 2019 FIFA women's WC updates. You know what, I am going to bed now (11pm local).
156: 251:
Does not matter, to you. This Knowledge (XXG) is not only for you. I have been doing these for months and years, and NOT a single complaint before you today. Not even the mighty
306: 206:
because their points will be below the runners=up of Group E, Group D, and Group C. There are no possible scenario which can make Pakhtakor qualified
311: 316: 103: 94: 58: 33: 237:
edit summary, it doesn't matter. There are no future fixtures today, therefore the (1 of 2 matches completed) is irrelevant.
147: 86: 291: 268: 246: 215: 192: 39: 211: 188: 102:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
99: 287: 242: 207: 184: 264: 254: 300: 283: 238: 276: 260: 228: 200: 177: 76: 80: 70: 52: 140: 135: 15: 234: 98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s 8: 47: 49: 92:This template is within the scope of 21: 19: 7: 112:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Football 38:It is of interest to the following 151: 146:This template was considered for 14: 307:Template-Class football articles 139: 79: 69: 51: 20: 312:NA-importance football articles 1: 317:WikiProject Football articles 115:Template:WikiProject Football 106:and see a list of open tasks. 87:Association football portal 333: 216:00:12, 27 April 2021 (UTC) 193:23:07, 26 April 2021 (UTC) 292:23:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC) 269:16:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC) 247:16:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC) 64: 46: 154:. The result of the 100:Association football 95:WikiProject Football 34:content assessment 168: 167: 134: 133: 130: 129: 126: 125: 118:football articles 324: 280: 258: 232: 204: 181: 153: 152:17 December 2022 143: 136: 120: 119: 116: 113: 110: 89: 84: 83: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 25: 24: 23: 16: 332: 331: 327: 326: 325: 323: 322: 321: 297: 296: 274: 252: 226: 224: 198: 175: 173: 117: 114: 111: 108: 107: 85: 78: 12: 11: 5: 330: 328: 320: 319: 314: 309: 299: 298: 295: 294: 223: 222:Group G tables 220: 219: 218: 172: 171:Group B tables 169: 166: 165: 144: 132: 131: 128: 127: 124: 123: 121: 104:the discussion 91: 90: 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 329: 318: 315: 313: 310: 308: 305: 304: 302: 293: 289: 285: 278: 273: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 256: 249: 248: 244: 240: 236: 230: 221: 217: 213: 209: 202: 197: 196: 195: 194: 190: 186: 179: 170: 163: 159: 158: 149: 145: 142: 138: 137: 122: 105: 101: 97: 96: 88: 82: 77: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 31: 27: 18: 17: 250: 225: 208:Fauzannaufan 185:Fauzannaufan 174: 162:no consensus 161: 155: 93: 40:WikiProjects 29: 301:Categories 255:S.A. Julio 233:Regarding 157:discussion 148:deletion 109:Football 59:Football 30:template 284:Mwiqdoh 239:Mwiqdoh 277:Flix11 261:Flix11 229:Flix11 201:Flix11 178:Flix11 36:scale. 160:was " 28:This 288:talk 265:talk 243:talk 235:this 212:talk 189:talk 150:on 303:: 290:) 267:) 245:) 214:) 191:) 164:". 286:( 279:: 275:@ 263:( 257:: 253:@ 241:( 231:: 227:@ 210:( 203:: 199:@ 187:( 180:: 176:@ 42::

Index

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Football
WikiProject icon
icon
Association football portal
WikiProject Football
Association football
the discussion

deletion
discussion
Flix11
Fauzannaufan
talk
23:07, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Flix11
Fauzannaufan
talk
00:12, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Flix11
this
Mwiqdoh
talk
16:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
S.A. Julio
Flix11
talk
16:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.