81:
71:
53:
22:
155:
137:
165:
384:
Mainland is, in my opinion, the best word to use for that row heading. This is because it refers precisely to the geographical area over which those courts have jurisdiction, ie. PRC minus (HK + Mo). If you can find another word which refers precisely to this geographical area, then please suggest it
228:
In this connection, law courts in Hong Kong and Macau are indeed not "PRC courts". The judiciaries of Hong Kong and Macau are independent and are not subordinate to the PRC judiciary. It is inaccurate and wrong for the template to label all the three court systems as "PRC court system" and to display
295:
Calling them mainland makes a lot more sense to the global audience than CPG: a random foreigner is far more likely to understand what's
Mainland than CPG. Using CPG is also wrong: for the reasons I said above, and because even with HK and Mo separated into their own categories, using CPG may give a
370:
is part of the legislature, not the judiciary. Although the constitutions of PRC and both SARs imply that NPCSC has interpretive power, NPCSC exercises its power by interpreting the constitutions directly, rather than passing verdicts for specific cases. That means it is part of the legislature and
332:
As I said before, NPCSC isn't part of the court system, and its controversial role means that it shouldn't belong to this table. "Mainland" is a far more accurate way to refer to the geographical jurisdiction of the courts, as CPG also has nominal control over HK and Mo. Please don't just revert
270:
I've decided to remove the line that says "constitutional court" = NPC standing committee. The NPCSC isn't part of the court system anyway, and its role is controversial. I've also changed "Central people's government" back to "Mainland", as that's a better reflection of the court's scope. Even
283:
I'd be interested in a good change from
Mainland/CPG, but it has to make sense to a global audience. The mainland/CPG courts are the primary courts of the primary jurisdiction of what the world sees as the most populous country. Calling them "mainland" courts is an incorrect label based on the
345:
I said NSCC instead of NPCSC in my edit summary, sorry. NPCSC is in a unique position, but as a legal interpretive body, over all courts including the SARS, it clearly belongs here. The wording of "constitutional court" could probably be
318:
I've changed CPG back to mainland, since you edited the page without responding to my argument above. Actually it makes a lot of sense for the IP editor to remove HK and Mo altogether: that'll end our debate here forever :)
237:
417:
225:" as guaranteed in the Basic Laws. Provision is also made in the PRC Constitution that the two SARs can set up their own systems that are different and independent from the one in mainland China.
349:
I am certainly willing to hear what you think "mainland/CPG" should be changed to. Mainland isn't it. You're equating the primary nation with outlier jurisdictions and that isn't right.
296:
reader the false impression that the mainland courts have authority over all PRC. If the outliers of HK and Mo didn't exist, we simply wouldn't need to subdivide the box into 3 sections.
221:
Although Hong Kong and Macau form parts of the People's
Republic of China, the people of the two Special Administrative Regions enjoy a "high degree of autonomy" under "
407:
412:
271:
though the
Chinese politburo is seen (and often acts) as one contiguous block, the court system is (nominally) subject to the congress, not the government.
299:
And please, don't undo two things at a time and explain only one of them. I've left the CPG vs. Mainland part in your version, but reverted the NPC part.
255:
HK/MO courts are subject to the interpretation by the NPCSC. They are separate legal systems, but all are part of the PRC court system as a whole.
240:" (which is indeed inapplicable to Hong Kong and Macau). That is why I remove the court systems of Hong Kong and Macau from the template. --
427:
432:
422:
437:
103:
33:
375:
94:
58:
102:
related articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
178:
142:
354:
289:
260:
222:
182:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
389:
337:
323:
303:
275:
39:
245:
350:
285:
256:
70:
52:
386:
334:
320:
300:
272:
241:
233:
401:
392:
340:
326:
306:
278:
249:
86:
154:
136:
164:
170:
160:
76:
232:"PRC Courts" should only be used to specifically refer to all ranks of the
284:
existence of outliers. What would this be labeled if HK/MO didn't exist?
238:
The
Organic Law of the People's Courts of the People's Republic of China
229:
the court systems of Hong Kong and Macau as if they were inferior.
363:
Thanks for responding to this discussion, it's really appreciated.
367:
99:
381:
may give a rough idea of what belongs to this kind of templates.
183:
15:
371:
therefore not part of the judiciary, let alone a "court". (
418:
Template-Class China-related articles of NA-importance
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
8:
131:
47:
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
217:HK and Macau courts are not "PRC courts"
333:unilaterally and avoid the discussion.
236:in the mainland that are formed under "
133:
49:
408:Template-Class China-related articles
176:This template is within the scope of
92:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
7:
413:NA-importance China-related articles
385:and I'm happy to hear your opinion.
186:and the subjects encompassed by it.
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
163:
153:
135:
79:
69:
51:
20:
1:
106:and see a list of open tasks.
428:Template-Class law articles
393:15:27, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
341:04:32, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
327:05:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
307:14:23, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
279:11:24, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
112:Knowledge:WikiProject China
454:
433:NA-importance law articles
423:WikiProject China articles
115:Template:WikiProject China
192:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
148:
64:
46:
438:WikiProject Law articles
250:16:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
195:Template:WikiProject Law
223:One Country Two Systems
118:China-related articles
376:CourtsEnglandWales
34:content assessment
214:
213:
210:
209:
206:
205:
130:
129:
126:
125:
95:WikiProject China
445:
380:
374:
200:
199:
196:
193:
190:
173:
168:
167:
157:
150:
149:
139:
132:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
453:
452:
448:
447:
446:
444:
443:
442:
398:
397:
378:
372:
234:People's Courts
219:
197:
194:
191:
188:
187:
179:WikiProject Law
169:
162:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
85:
80:
78:
12:
11:
5:
451:
449:
441:
440:
435:
430:
425:
420:
415:
410:
400:
399:
396:
395:
382:
361:
360:
359:
358:
351:SchmuckyTheCat
347:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
297:
286:SchmuckyTheCat
265:
264:
257:SchmuckyTheCat
218:
215:
212:
211:
208:
207:
204:
203:
201:
175:
174:
158:
146:
145:
140:
128:
127:
124:
123:
121:
104:the discussion
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
450:
439:
436:
434:
431:
429:
426:
424:
421:
419:
416:
414:
411:
409:
406:
405:
403:
394:
391:
388:
383:
377:
369:
366:
365:
364:
356:
352:
348:
344:
343:
342:
339:
336:
331:
330:
329:
328:
325:
322:
308:
305:
302:
298:
294:
293:
291:
287:
282:
281:
280:
277:
274:
269:
268:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
230:
226:
224:
216:
202:
185:
181:
180:
172:
166:
161:
159:
156:
152:
151:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
362:
317:
231:
227:
220:
198:law articles
177:
93:
87:China portal
40:WikiProjects
29:
184:legal field
402:Categories
242:Clithering
171:Law portal
346:changed.
30:template
390:yck C.
338:yck C.
324:yck C.
304:yck C.
276:yck C.
36:scale.
368:NPCSC
109:China
100:China
59:China
28:This
355:talk
290:talk
261:talk
246:talk
387:Der
335:Der
321:Der
301:Der
273:Der
189:Law
143:Law
404::
379:}}
373:{{
292:)
248:)
357:)
353:(
288:(
263:)
259:(
244:(
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
