271:
system" is very controversial scientifically, and is mostly based on older views of the brain. Second, this template is about the telencephalon, while the "limbic lobe" is composed of multiple different brain areas, including many outside the telencephalon. Third, the limbic lobe/system is in fact better defined as a system, not as a well-defined anatomical region. In contrast, this template is about defining clear-cut anatomical regions, such as the frontal lobe, the temporal lobe. By adopting a "limbic system" section, one is forced to withdraw the orbitofrontal cortex from the frontal lobe, to remove the parahippocampal gyrus from the temporal lobe, etc, etc. This will create more confusion than anything. Fourth, the limbic system already has its own template, so that people who are interested in knowing more about the limbic system can refer to quick information easily:
142:
121:
22:
184:
71:
53:
351:
This confusion is introduced because the limbic cortex is listed as a separate section. Since this template has adopted a topological organization of the telencephal, it should abandon the the limbic cortex. Of course, this move does not preclude that
Knowledge (XXG) provides thoroughful information
270:
I thought we should abandon the limbic systmem altogether in this template. Henceforth, I made the necessary changes (eg. I put the parahippocampal gyrus into the temporal lobe). I have four arguments against inserting a limbic system here. First, the very idea of a (single) "limbic lobe" or "limbic
261:
all, so it is expected that any template about telencephalon will be crowded of information. Of course, this is not an argument against improving the template, but it puts things into perspective. Perhaps we could remove the
Brodmann areas in order to space up the information, but I am not convinced.
281:
Well, someone reintroduced the Limbic Lobe in the subsection, and now we have a full mess, with references to the medial temporal lobe at one place, and references to the subsections of the medial temporal lobe at another place. Worse, the changes were done such that readers are led to believe that
260:
Just a quick note about this criticism. There are several templates like this one that are currently created in
Knowledge (XXG). This one is about the telencephalon. Others are about the diencephalon, the brainstem, etc... The telencephalon is indeed a very complicated structure, the most of them
333:
You are missing the main issue: as it currently stands, the template enumerates the medial temporal lobe and the parahippocampal gyrus of the limbic lobe as two different things, whereas it's one biological reality. Similarly, the template enumerates BA 25 in the frontal lobe and parts of the
218:
Secondly, the limbic lobe (a term that is rarely used nowadays) might be better renamed the limbic system and be brought lower down the list together with the basal ganglia and insula which are also collections of deep cortical
243:
I'm in favor of better organizing the brain articles. However, I think this template should get broken up into smaller navigation panels. There's just so much information that it looks cluttered. --
316:
282:
perirhinal cortex and
Brodmann's area 35 are two different things, or that entorhinal cortex and Brodmann's area 28 and 34 are two different things. Can't someone be a referee here?
416:
436:
421:
192:
87:
426:
431:
334:
cingulate cortex of the limbic cortex as two different regions, but again it is one overlapping biological reality. Such dichotomy is not serious.
441:
158:
78:
58:
359:
289:
149:
126:
33:
386:
390:
141:
120:
39:
216:
Firstly, most text would agree that the 4 lobes of the brain are frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital lobe.
398:
355:
285:
304:
249:
363:
293:
230:
157:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
86:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
394:
324:
244:
393:
should be added to this template, but I'm not sure about the appropriate organization.
410:
320:
402:
367:
328:
297:
254:
233:
83:
312:
308:
272:
225:
part of the basal ganglia and should be classified under the limbic system.
183:
154:
70:
52:
227:
Lastly, the hippocampal formation is also part of the limbic system.
15:
182:
153:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
221:Thirdly, the most glaring error, the amygdala is
191:This template has been classified as relating to
352:about the limbic cortex in separate articles.
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
303:Have you reviewed the classifications used in
273:http://en.wikipedia.org/Template:Limbic_system
319:may also be beneficial in this discussion. --
8:
115:
47:
96:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Neuroscience
117:
49:
147:This template is within the scope of
76:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
7:
417:Template-Class neuroscience articles
437:Anatomy articles about neuroanatomy
422:NA-importance neuroscience articles
167:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Anatomy
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
311:, both of which specifically use
214:A few critisms for this template:
210:Amygdala belongs to Limbic System
99:Template:WikiProject Neuroscience
315:in their hierarchies? Reviewing
140:
119:
69:
51:
20:
427:Template-Class Anatomy articles
432:NA-importance Anatomy articles
387:Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
1:
391:Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex
381:Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex
161:and see a list of open tasks.
90:and see a list of open tasks.
442:WikiProject Anatomy articles
403:10:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
255:19:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
170:Template:WikiProject Anatomy
368:07:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
329:16:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
298:08:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
458:
234:03:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
190:
135:
64:
46:
79:WikiProject Neuroscience
305:Terminologia Anatomica
187:
186:
102:neuroscience articles
239:Information overload
266:About Limbic system
150:WikiProject Anatomy
188:
34:content assessment
358:comment added by
288:comment added by
253:
207:
206:
203:
202:
199:
198:
114:
113:
110:
109:
449:
370:
300:
247:
175:
174:
173:Anatomy articles
171:
168:
165:
144:
137:
136:
131:
123:
116:
104:
103:
100:
97:
94:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
457:
456:
452:
451:
450:
448:
447:
446:
407:
406:
383:
353:
283:
268:
241:
212:
172:
169:
166:
163:
162:
129:
101:
98:
95:
92:
91:
12:
11:
5:
455:
453:
445:
444:
439:
434:
429:
424:
419:
409:
408:
382:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
267:
264:
263:
262:
240:
237:
228:
226:
220:
217:
215:
211:
208:
205:
204:
201:
200:
197:
196:
189:
179:
178:
176:
159:the discussion
145:
133:
132:
130:: Neuroanatomy
124:
112:
111:
108:
107:
105:
88:the discussion
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
454:
443:
440:
438:
435:
433:
430:
428:
425:
423:
420:
418:
415:
414:
412:
405:
404:
400:
396:
395:Sondra.kinsey
392:
388:
380:
369:
365:
361:
357:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
332:
331:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
301:
299:
295:
291:
287:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
274:
265:
259:
258:
257:
256:
251:
246:
238:
236:
235:
232:
231:129.78.64.106
224:
209:
194:
185:
181:
180:
177:
160:
156:
152:
151:
146:
143:
139:
138:
134:
128:
125:
122:
118:
106:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
384:
269:
245:TheLimbicOne
242:
222:
213:
193:neuroanatomy
148:
93:Neuroscience
84:Neuroscience
77:
59:Neuroscience
40:WikiProjects
29:
360:142.85.5.20
354:—Preceding
313:limbic lobe
290:142.85.5.20
284:—Preceding
411:Categories
385:I believe
309:NeuroNames
356:unsigned
321:Arcadian
286:unsigned
30:template
219:nuclei.
164:Anatomy
155:Anatomy
127:Anatomy
317:MEDMOS
36:scale.
28:This
399:talk
389:and
364:talk
325:talk
294:talk
250:talk
307:or
223:not
413::
401:)
366:)
327:)
296:)
275:.
229:--
397:(
362:(
323:(
292:(
252:)
248:(
195:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
