264:
112:"do not remove the inactive reference, but rather record the date that the original link was found to be inactive — even inactive, it still records the sources that were used, and it is possible hard copies of such references may exist, or alternatively that the page will turn up in the near future in the Internet Archive, which deliberately lags by six months or more. When printed sources become outdated, scholars still routinely cite those works when referenced."
49:
21:
216:
109:"This article or section uses citations that link to broken or outdated sources, and are deemed unreliable" Is this accurate? My understanding was that broken links are still considered reliable. See
270:
it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. I've commented out the sentence with the link to the missing tool. That was one of
274:'s tools and I'm not certain where, or even if, there is a replacement for it. If anyone finds one, please open a new request to add the link to the new tool. Thank you. —
55:
26:
296:
248:
85:
91:
195:
131:
I feel that there should also be an inline version which could be appended to each item which includes a broken link. __
222:
300:
252:
183:
60:
34:
161:
187:
150:
117:
244:
290:
277:
191:
157:
271:
136:
304:
282:
256:
199:
165:
140:
121:
113:
177:
48:
20:
132:
110:
90:
This article has not yet received a rating on
Knowledge (XXG)'s
210:
176:
The citation bot is available to assist you if needed:
295:Thanks for responding. Your solution works for me.
58:, a project which is currently considered to be
207:Semi-protected edit request on 23 December 2014
178:http://toolserver.org/~verisimilus/Bot/DOI_bot/
8:
70:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Reference works
15:
17:
7:
73:Template:WikiProject Reference works
54:This article is within the scope of
14:
262:
214:
47:
19:
1:
305:20:33, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
283:16:16, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
257:10:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
243:The link on this template to
141:08:29, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
166:11:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
122:23:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
237:to reactivate your request.
225:has been answered. Set the
56:WikiProject Reference works
320:
89:
42:
200:20:09, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
76:Reference works articles
245:the Checklinks tool
92:content assessment
241:
240:
203:
186:comment added by
102:
101:
98:
97:
311:
294:
281:
266:
265:
232:
228:
218:
217:
211:
202:
180:
155:
149:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
51:
44:
43:
38:
31:
23:
16:
319:
318:
314:
313:
312:
310:
309:
308:
288:
275:
263:
230:
226:
215:
209:
181:
174:
153:
147:
129:
107:
75:
72:
69:
67:Reference works
66:
65:
32:
29:
27:Reference works
12:
11:
5:
317:
315:
297:172.164.28.167
286:
285:
249:172.164.28.167
247:doesn't work.
239:
238:
219:
208:
205:
173:
170:
169:
168:
146:There is, see
128:
127:Inline pendant
125:
106:
103:
100:
99:
96:
95:
88:
82:
81:
79:
52:
40:
39:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
316:
307:
306:
302:
298:
292:
284:
279:
273:
269:
261:
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
246:
236:
233:parameter to
224:
220:
213:
212:
206:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
179:
172:Bot Available
171:
167:
163:
159:
152:
145:
144:
143:
142:
138:
134:
126:
124:
123:
119:
115:
111:
104:
93:
87:
84:
83:
80:
63:
62:
57:
53:
50:
46:
45:
41:
36:
28:
25:
22:
18:
291:Technical 13
287:
278:Technical 13
268:Partly done:
267:
242:
234:
223:edit request
175:
130:
108:
59:
182:—Preceding
158:AlanBarrett
227:|answered=
30:Unassessed
272:Dispenser
151:dead link
196:contribs
184:unsigned
114:AndrewRT
61:inactive
35:inactive
188:R12056
94:scale.
231:|ans=
221:This
301:talk
276:{{U|
253:talk
192:talk
162:talk
137:talk
133:meco
118:Talk
280:}}
229:or
156:. —
105:...
86:???
303:)
255:)
235:no
198:)
194:•
164:)
154:}}
148:{{
139:)
120:)
299:(
293::
289:@
251:(
190:(
160:(
135:(
116:(
64:.
37:)
33:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
