364:, and details of planned launches have been published. And it's more than a pipe dream, as if Nasa does not get continued funding for this project, they will literally have to rely on the Russians if they want to get people into space and to the space station which they largely built. Indeed, they will rely on the Russians once the last shuttle goes up (by September 2010) until this program bears fruit and delivers a crew (September 2014, assuming no technical or funding delays). The Orion flights therefore warrant inclusion as a) Nasa has published planned flight dates, b) the program is funded and operational (though in its early stages) and c) for political reasons it is hard to imagine the program being abandoned as it will close off guaranteed American access to space. While c) is an opinion which would not warrant inclusion of the flights to the template, a) and b) are not.
22:
304:
flight would be "current." And that sequence, I realized, would be kept once the soyuz landed. We should be either listing flights by date of launch or by date of landing, but not both. Seems logical to go by launch sequence as that is the near-universal practice here and elsewhere. So, in the future the long-lasting soyuz missions once they are over should be placed in the proper sequence, i.e. ahead of shuttle launches which followed the soyuz launch.
71:
53:
81:
416:
It seems Senaka wants to make a distinction here about what he defines as "planned". There is a semantic nuance here which he doesn't seem to appreciate, but I nevertheless see his point. So how about this, if we make the distinction here between "scheduled" flights and "proposed" flights, that might
392:
What about just having a single link: "Orion flights" pointing to the general Orion article, or a "List of planned Orion flights" article instead ? Understandable, consistent, not messy, and would contain as much useful information as the "mission" articles at the moment. As a matter of fact, those
303:
I've corrected the sequence of flights to match actual launch dates. While older flights are in order of launch, the past several years when an shuttle launch went after a soyuz launch and the shuttle subsequently landed, the shuttle would quite naturally be placed as a "past" launch while the soyuz
288:. All subject to change, of course, but it would seem as STS flights are adjusted here and there, the presumption should be that these schedules are more or less intact. The dates on some of the individual flights are clearly wrong, or at least not sourced.
254:
I originally bolded the Soyuz ones just so you could see at a glance which missions were soyuz and which were space shuttles.. without something they kinda blend together; i'd prefer some visual difference, like bolding, or colour, but i'm not fussy.
324:
Nasa plans to fly manned Orion flights to the ISS. And Nasa has published future planned flights. Therefore, despite these flights not yet appearing on Nasa's launch manifest, they should appear here, unless Nasa changes the program or cancels it.
340:
To date, the ISS mission is scheduled until early 2011. Orion missions - to date no more than the desire of developers of Orion, but by no means official NASA plans for astronauts flights to ISS--
417:
be a bit better. Or, if the "proposed" Orion flights as I have it are too "messy," then take them off, but don't forget to clean up the Orion pages if that is to happen. Cheers.
272:
I've taken the liberty of reordering the future STS and Soyuz flights so as to conform to the various expedition schedules listed elsewhere here, in particular
441:
446:
451:
377:
It plans to developers of Orion, but no official plans for space missions to the ISS. Official plans approved prior to the ISS Expedition 29 in 2011--
103:
238:
184:
357:
94:
58:
356:
SeNeKa, this is far from simply "the desire of developers of Orion," Nasa is being funded for
Constellation/Orion, (as this link
244:
190:
33:
406:
232:
178:
39:
218:
I'm not sure about the Soyuz ones, as for FF's, I did all of those, and I probably just copied a Soyuz... --
164:'ing the Human Spaceflight articles. It's political correctness gone mad. Manned is the more used term. --
422:
369:
330:
309:
293:
102:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
393:
are SO far into the future, i've been thinking about merge/redirecting them into a list anyways. --
360:
226:
172:
152:
362:
86:
418:
382:
365:
345:
326:
305:
289:
402:
161:
141:
I dont like the use of Manned, seems male chauvinistic to me, should be Human ISS flight.
426:
410:
386:
349:
334:
313:
297:
259:
249:
212:
195:
155:
145:
70:
52:
435:
285:
281:
277:
273:
209:
378:
341:
142:
99:
394:
256:
76:
15:
208:
Why are some items (Soyuz and all future flights) in bold?
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
359:explicitly states) tests are now being conducted
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
268:Sequence of future flights as per Expeditions
8:
47:
112:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Spaceflight
49:
92:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
7:
442:Template-Class spaceflight articles
38:It is of interest to the following
447:NA-importance spaceflight articles
14:
452:WikiProject Spaceflight articles
115:Template:WikiProject Spaceflight
79:
69:
51:
20:
151:No, Manned doesn't imply male.
146:03:33, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
1:
314:22:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
298:21:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
106:and see a list of open tasks.
260:18:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
468:
427:21:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
411:12:54, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
387:10:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
350:17:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
335:19:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
156:00:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
64:
46:
250:18:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
213:16:11, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
196:18:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
95:WikiProject Spaceflight
118:spaceflight articles
87:Spaceflight portal
34:content assessment
134:
133:
130:
129:
126:
125:
459:
398:
223:
169:
160:I'm thinking of
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
467:
466:
462:
461:
460:
458:
457:
456:
432:
431:
396:
322:
270:
248:
219:
206:
194:
165:
139:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
85:
80:
78:
12:
11:
5:
465:
463:
455:
454:
449:
444:
434:
433:
430:
429:
390:
389:
374:
373:
353:
352:
321:
318:
317:
316:
269:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
224:
221:GW_Simulations
205:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
170:
167:GW_Simulations
153:Richard Taylor
138:
135:
132:
131:
128:
127:
124:
123:
121:
104:the discussion
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
464:
453:
450:
448:
445:
443:
440:
439:
437:
428:
424:
420:
415:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
400:
388:
384:
380:
376:
375:
371:
367:
363:
361:
358:
355:
354:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:
336:
332:
328:
320:Orion flights
319:
315:
311:
307:
302:
301:
300:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:Expedition 20
283:
282:Expedition 19
279:
278:Expedition 18
275:
274:Expedition 17
267:
261:
258:
253:
252:
251:
247:
246:
241:
240:
235:
234:
229:
228:
222:
217:
216:
215:
214:
211:
203:
197:
193:
192:
187:
186:
181:
180:
175:
174:
168:
163:
159:
158:
157:
154:
150:
149:
148:
147:
144:
136:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
391:
323:
271:
243:
237:
231:
225:
220:
207:
204:Bolded items
189:
183:
177:
171:
166:
140:
93:
40:WikiProjects
29:
419:Canada Jack
366:Canada Jack
327:Canada Jack
306:Canada Jack
290:Canada Jack
109:Spaceflight
100:spaceflight
59:Spaceflight
436:Categories
227:|User Page
173:|User Page
407:contribs
239:Contribs
185:Contribs
30:template
210:Rillian
379:SeNeKa
342:SeNeKa
245:E-mail
191:E-mail
143:Hektor
137:Manned
36:scale.
257:Mlm42
28:This
423:talk
403:talk
383:talk
370:talk
346:talk
331:talk
310:talk
294:talk
284:and
233:Talk
179:Talk
438::
425:)
409:)
405:•
399:DJ
395:Th
385:)
348:)
333:)
312:)
296:)
280:,
276:,
242:|
230:|
188:|
176:|
162:RM
421:(
401:(
397:e
381:(
372:)
368:(
344:(
329:(
308:(
292:(
236:|
182:|
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
