31:
729:
what
Knowledge is about. Knowledge isn't Usenet, or Google News, or indeed any kind of information source that can be relied upon to give information that is both accurate and up-to-date. Of course, neither Uaenet not Google News are reliable either. But at least we don't squat on the turf in a position that might be interpreted as a claim to ownership.
937:
406:
I read somewhere around here that the word 'vehicle' was added to the template to refer to a camper, mobile home, or other 'live in' vehicle. I think this is a little redundant with 'shelter'. To me, it really reads as 'in motion vehicle' rather than something that can be both a shelter AND a moving
126:
article during landfall. While the article turned out well enough, we did experience a fair amount of false information throughout the course of the article's development; mainly as a result of unsubstantiated rumors being added as well as vandals of the sneakier sort. I think it's only fair that we
728:
An encyclopedia is a long, slow project that can never claim to be up to date. These facts are covered in our site disclaimer (which is linked from every page you read, if you're reading
Knowledge). Adding "current event"-related templates to articles, giving whatever information, misrepresents
170:
This template will almost always be used with {{current}}. I would suggest that {{current}} come first for two reasons. First, the currentness of the article includes the hurricane warning. Second, HurricaneWarning is wide, so having the little {{current}} box under the wide
HurricaneWarning box
279:
Looks good. I think ] would be better since it would allow for arbitrary names of hurricanes (in case it needs a year disambiguating it or for whatever reason if it doesn't start with "Hurricane "). Can a template have an optional second argument that could be used as the link target?
150:
And I think Loren's capsulization there is probably the best explanation to those in the "who do we think we are that people would listen to us" and "are our readers really that stupid?" camps, as well. Would the extra sentence pointing out that anyone can edit be worth
324:
Looks good. I just changed it so the {{{1}}} isn't in link brackets, that way when it is used on said hurricane's page, it doesn't create a link back to that page. Can an admin edit this page, HurricaneWarning, to be
HurricaneWarning2?
289:
Ok, I made it into {{1}}. With the current software, there's no way to make an optional parameter -- the usual strategy, is to have one version of the template that accepts a parameter, and one that doesn't, as is the case with
800:
Given that not all storms are major and that some are more powerful that others but all can cause significant damage i wish to propose a change in this template, based apon the {{Currentdisaster}} , to as follows:
545:
So
Knowledge policy is negotiable? It seems to me like this is exactly the type of thing WP:NDT was intended to cover. It seems the discussion basically says guidelines don't apply 'cause they just don't. This is
555:
This is a very new policy... less than a few weeks. The old discussion was from over a year ago. I wouldn't call the participants of that discussion "stupid". In any case, I nominated this template for deletion.
920:
Comment - one doesn't re-open to gather consensus, one opens an RFC to gather consensus, but in any case it appears that you have reached consensus on the proposed edit.
529:
84:
I don't think the reasoning behind it is legal; it's rather humanitarian. We really don't want people risking theiir lives on a page that could be vandalized.--
411:
577:
There are many things wrong this this template. It emphasizes drama and authority and it uses present tense. We should just get rid of it altogether.--
983:, maybe it should simply be redirected to that template? I say this in light of the fact that I have been unable to make some of the parameters from
491:
I think of medical conditions as "live" as they are happening to somebody right now and medical research is being done on many of them right now.
536:, and that stepping outside of the encyclopedic goals of this project is acceptable when creating an article on a currently active hurricane.
921:
506:
People who are going to be affected should probably heed the advice in the template, too. So, I changed it. 10:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
421:
47:
17:
528:
I asked a few sections above basically the same question. I then realized that extensive discussion had already taken place at a
792:
Information in this article may not be current or applicable to your area. Residents of areas under threat from or affected by
1012:
432:
I removed the command at the end of the template telling people how to decide whether or not to evacuate, because it is POV.
373:
372:
Wait, it's ok for it to link to itself, self-links always just appear in bold. For instance, a link to this very talk page:
111:
Well I am one of the many people that will be affected by
Hurricane Rita, and I appreciate those that made this warning. ~
993:
work with this template (i.e. the new red=yes parameter). It seems silly to have to modify this template every time that
465:
461:
221:
I'm not familiar with the features of MediaWiki's templates, but it would be nice if the
HurricaneWarning linked to
38:
185:}} at the top of this template? Like you say they will generally go together. Is there any situation where they
997:
987:
977:
925:
900:
469:
256:
611:
I'm not taking a position on the desirablity or otherwise of the template, but it's probably worth saying that
815:
Though this article is updated frequently, it may not reflect the most current information about this cyclone.
850:
1017:
960:
929:
914:
879:
877:
868:
855:
838:
828:
771:
758:
736:
733:
717:
700:
685:
Anyone think it should be "their respective authorities" since the
Subject of the sentence is "Residents"
674:
660:
624:
600:
581:
560:
550:
547:
540:
522:
519:
495:
485:
476:
449:
385:
347:
338:
329:
319:
304:
284:
272:
248:
233:
208:
193:
175:
157:
141:
131:
117:
106:
88:
78:
666:
What's wrong with it? There have been ongoing image issues on the server side, if that's the problem. --
239:
It could be, if the template were not protected, by making it into a link, i.e. replacing {{1}} with . --
103:
955:
863:
824:
807:
578:
620:
436:
820:
1009:
945:
911:
845:
689:
Residents of areas under threat from or affected by {{{1}}} are advised to seek information from
592:
Knowledge policy is negotiable. It wasn't handed down from on high...well, most of it wasn't. --
344:
326:
281:
230:
172:
138:
75:
874:
557:
537:
492:
473:
381:
315:
268:
244:
123:
949:
713:
671:
657:
597:
182:
616:
482:
294:
860:
I support the change as well. So it doesn't violate the policies pointed out at the TFD.
647:
643:
I'm supposed to be on wikibreak, but shouldn't the template work in all browsers? With
634:
260:
226:
222:
481:
As i see it
Tropical Cyclone Articles are LIVE where as Medical Articles are not live
464:
into a template message on all medicine related articles. Why do we need to duplicate
1004:
784:
779:
751:
747:
743:
612:
533:
515:
408:
835:
755:
418:
377:
335:
311:
264:
240:
205:
154:
128:
112:
94:
709:
697:
667:
654:
593:
446:
190:
85:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
812:
Information regarding {{{{1}}}} may change rapidly as the event progresses.
788:
regarding no disclaimers in articles. The text in the article is currently:
746:
twice and the conclusion was that this template is an exception to the rule
706:
343:
Great. I just updated everything that links to it and added usage above. —
171:
looks weird. I will go ahead and make that change to
Hurricane Rita. —
532:. For some reason, consensus was that this case is an exception to
202:
I can't see any reason why it wouldn't, and I concur: merge it in.
796:
are advised to seek information from the respective authorities.
844:
I support the change, and I will change it if others agree. ♬♩
122:
This template is essentially the same one that was used on the
25:
732:
This template should not be used. It has no place here. --
782:
and points have been raised that it does not comply with a
407:
vehicle. I suggest dropping 'vehicle' completely. --
74:Is this really necessary? Did the Legal say so? —
910:that bothers me and I believe violates WP:NDA.
225:, at least when it is used on other pages like
8:
834:Not done. Need to get consensus first. ---
456:How is this different than medical articles
896:, change it into a pre-loaded version of
707:http://www.yourdictionary.com/respective
653:, it doesn't appear properly in Safari.
518:? Seems to me like it shouldn't be here.
514:How is this not a complete violation of
973:Since it' just a pre-loaded version of
724:This does not belong on an encyclopedia
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
806:ATTENTION: This article documents a
18:Template talk:Current weather event
127:warn people of this possibility. -
24:
530:templates for deletion discussion
935:
29:
675:05:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
661:01:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
625:13:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
615:is a guideline, not a policy.
601:15:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
422:08:21, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
412:07:01, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
386:05:24, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
374:Template talk:HurricaneWarning
348:04:31, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
339:04:11, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
330:03:29, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
320:00:00, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
285:23:48, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
273:23:43, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
249:23:40, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
234:16:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
194:05:19, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
176:16:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
142:16:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
132:06:27, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
118:05:09, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
107:04:05, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
89:02:12, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
79:02:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
1:
1018:17:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
759:05:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
737:05:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
718:19:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
887:Reopened to gather consensus
701:14:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
466:Knowledge:General disclaimer
462:Knowledge:Medical disclaimer
450:21:51, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
229:. Can that be done easily? —
209:18:58, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
158:18:56, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
778:The current template is at
582:00:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
561:23:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
551:02:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
541:01:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
523:21:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
496:17:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
486:17:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
477:18:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
439:comment added by ] (] • ])
102:Can you say whether or not
1033:
839:03:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
829:14:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
257:Template:HurricaneWarning2
961:10:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
930:01:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
915:18:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
880:01:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
869:01:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
856:00:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
470:Knowledge:Risk disclaimer
255:Ok, what do you think of
808:current tropical cyclone
693:respective authorities.
472:on hurricane articles?
460:We don't duplicate the
181:What about including {{
969:Point of this template
906:if you want. It's the
742:It has been put up on
402:Evacuate your vehicle?
42:of past discussions.
873:I support, as well.
765:Change of template
137:OK, fair enough. —
1016:
853:
816:
441:
124:Hurricane Katrina
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1024:
1007:
1002:
998:current disaster
996:
992:
988:current disaster
986:
982:
978:current disaster
976:
943:
939:
938:
905:
901:Current disaster
899:
867:
849:
814:
775:
652:
646:
639:
633:
440:
433:
309:
303:
299:
293:
115:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1000:
994:
990:
984:
980:
974:
971:
936:
934:
922:199.125.109.102
903:
897:
861:
769:
767:
726:
683:
650:
644:
641:
637:
631:
548:194.169.192.139
520:194.169.192.139
512:
504:
458:
434:
430:
404:
307:
301:
297:
291:
219:
168:
113:
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1030:
1028:
1003:is modified. —
970:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
891:
890:
842:
841:
818:
817:
813:
798:
797:
766:
763:
762:
761:
725:
722:
721:
720:
682:
679:
678:
677:
640:
629:
628:
627:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
586:
585:
584:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
511:
508:
503:
500:
499:
498:
457:
454:
453:
452:
429:
426:
425:
424:
417:Fair enough. -
403:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
276:
275:
261:Houston, Texas
252:
251:
227:Houston, Texas
223:Hurricane Rita
218:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
203:
197:
196:
167:
164:
163:
162:
161:
160:
152:
145:
144:
104:24.250.136.236
100:
99:
98:
97:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1029:
1020:
1019:
1014:
1011:
1006:
999:
989:
979:
968:
962:
959:
958:
953:
952:
947:
946:Hurricanehink
942:
933:
932:
931:
927:
923:
919:
918:
917:
916:
913:
912:ViperSnake151
909:
902:
895:
889:
888:
884:
883:
882:
881:
878:
876:
871:
870:
866:
865:
858:
857:
852:
847:
846:Hurricanehink
840:
837:
833:
832:
831:
830:
826:
822:
811:
809:
804:
803:
802:
795:
791:
790:
789:
787:
786:
781:
776:
773:
772:Editprotected
764:
760:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
740:
739:
738:
735:
730:
723:
719:
715:
711:
708:
705:
704:
703:
702:
699:
695:
694:
692:
686:
680:
676:
673:
669:
665:
664:
663:
662:
659:
656:
649:
636:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
609:
602:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
580:
579:75.36.172.192
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
562:
559:
554:
553:
552:
549:
544:
543:
542:
539:
535:
531:
527:
526:
525:
524:
521:
517:
509:
507:
501:
497:
494:
490:
489:
488:
487:
484:
479:
478:
475:
471:
467:
463:
455:
451:
448:
444:
443:
442:
438:
427:
423:
420:
416:
415:
414:
413:
410:
401:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
349:
346:
345:BenFrantzDale
342:
341:
340:
337:
333:
332:
331:
328:
327:BenFrantzDale
323:
322:
321:
317:
313:
306:
305:Deletebecause
296:
288:
287:
286:
283:
282:BenFrantzDale
278:
277:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
250:
246:
242:
238:
237:
236:
235:
232:
231:BenFrantzDale
228:
224:
216:
210:
207:
201:
200:
199:
198:
195:
192:
189:go together?
188:
184:
180:
179:
178:
177:
174:
173:BenFrantzDale
165:
159:
156:
149:
148:
147:
146:
143:
140:
139:BenFrantzDale
136:
135:
134:
133:
130:
125:
120:
119:
116:
109:
108:
105:
96:
93:Agreed. --
92:
91:
90:
87:
83:
82:
81:
80:
77:
76:BenFrantzDale
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
972:
956:
950:
940:
907:
893:
892:
886:
885:
875:Juliancolton
872:
862:
859:
843:
819:
805:
799:
793:
783:
777:
768:
734:Tony Sidaway
731:
727:
696:
690:
688:
687:
684:
642:
589:
513:
505:
480:
459:
431:
405:
220:
186:
169:
121:
110:
101:
95:user:zanimum
73:
60:
43:
37:
510:Disclaimers
435:—Preceding
36:This is an
617:Loganberry
483:Jason Rees
70:Necessary?
908:ATTENTION
785:guideline
61:Archive 1
1013:contribs
1005:Elipongo
821:Seddon69
437:unsigned
187:wouldn't
114:BRO-co03
894:Support
836:RockMFR
794:{{{1}}}
756:CWY2190
691:*their*
546:stupid.
409:Ch'marr
378:Mysidia
334:Done. -
312:Mysidia
265:Mysidia
241:Mysidia
206:Baylink
183:Current
155:Baylink
151:adding?
39:archive
780:WP:TFD
752:WP:IAR
750:using
748:WP:NDA
744:WP:TFD
710:Zanter
698:Zanter
681:their?
668:Cyrius
658:Chacor
613:WP:NDT
594:Cyrius
590:course
558:Sancho
538:Sancho
534:WP:NDT
516:WP:NDT
502:Future
493:Sancho
474:Sancho
447:Jdorje
295:Delete
191:Jdorje
86:Pharos
957:melon
951:Happy
754:. ---
648:ambox
635:ambox
445:Huh?
419:Loren
336:Loren
310:. --
217:Link?
166:Style
129:Loren
16:<
1010:Talk
941:Done
926:talk
851:talk
825:talk
714:talk
621:Talk
468:and
428:NPOV
382:talk
376:. --
316:talk
300:and
269:talk
263:? --
259:and
245:talk
944:by
588:Of
1001:}}
995:{{
991:}}
985:{{
981:}}
975:{{
948:.
928:)
904:}}
898:{{
864:32
854:)
827:)
774:}}
770:{{
716:)
651:}}
645:{{
638:}}
632:{{
623:)
384:)
318:)
308:}}
302:{{
298:}}
292:{{
271:)
247:)
204:--
153:--
1015:)
1008:(
954:‑
924:(
848:(
823:(
810:.
712:(
672:✎
670:|
655:–
619:(
598:✎
596:|
380:(
325:—
314:(
280:—
267:(
243:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.