Template talk:Basic forms of government

2051:

origins firmly establish that contemporary usage of the term refers to a distinct form of government. I agree that "bureaucracy", compared to "administration," has a negative connotation and perhaps suggests that the career bureaucrats are self-interested in performance their duties, but I do not see why this means that it is a form of government. For example, the executive branch of the United States has numerous officials who without doubt are accused all the time of "using power for the good of their 'class'" -- does that then mean the United States is not a democracy, but rather a bureaucracy? I think not. The executive branch, however, IS referred to quite commonly as a "bureaucracy" -- typing in the words "United States bureaucracy" in quotes into Google comes up with 60,100 hits alone, and again, I believe few people would disagree that many executive branch officials are "using power for the good of their 'class'". But if "bureaucracy" were a form of government, then by your definition, the United States doesn't "have" a bureaucracy in its executive branch; rather, the entire government

2564:

the standard of notability (adjusted for the subsumed), which determines whether a form of government can have its own article. An article on a form of government should link to other forms of government, and the template supports that. So, if an article is about a form of government that does not qualify for the template, we should still have the template in that article, for the sake of readers and researchers. At the same time, if we add a form of government into the template, we could reasonably assume that it must be at least a notable form of government or subsumed within one, so there should certainly be an article covering that form of government, either at that moment or soon thereafter, either under the same name or by a pipe or redirect.

1462:

different types. If a government is dominated by men, it can thus be assorted as an androcracy, so do the others. Then, we can decide whether those esoteric concepts should remain or not. If this template is just made to list those obviously formal forms of government, it will also be very necessary to make a new list to include those esoteric ones. I firmly think that Knowledge (XXG) should also have the function to inspire or arouse something new in the readers' mind. At least, they should be provided with the chance to meet those esoteric ones rather than the stereotypes. If the criteria are too strict on this, something important may also be eliminated,too.

1793:

understand that bureaucracy as well as aristocracy, technocracy etc. is replacement for demo-cracy. In democratic society we need administration (civil service) not usurpations for domination. Bureaucracy should be understand as form of undemocratic government or spoiled social service. Administration ought to be executor and only executor of legislative orders - in democratic society they are the parliament statutes. In addition parliament should be only representation of people (i.e. demos). On other world it parliament needs legitimation of people to be democratic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.104.138.176 (talk) 05:26, 5 October 2012 (UTC)"

2410:

is constrained by the law or the legislature. If an actual government were to rule in the form of government administrators who were independent of the law, then in common American English at least, we would call them oligarchies or oligarchs, because they're not just enforcing the law, but above the law. To be above the law is inconsistent with the American form of governmnet, so while bureaucracy is thrown around casually at political opponents, the word oligarchy has a more damning implication and better represents what I think Burham is talking about.

4673:. From the meritocracy article, I'm getting the definition, in my own words, "government officials are selected based on merit", whereas technocracy would be "government officials are experts". I don't really see how meritocracy is only an ideal, or at least not more or less than technocracy, as the article does list historical instances of meritocracy. I also think technocracy seems like a special case of meritocracy. Lastly, I'm starting to think that neither should be listed as a "basic form of government", given that neither of them have existed at the 1886:, Here is the definition from Britannica: "ADMINISTRATION (Lat. administratote, to serve) the performance or management of affairs, term specifically used in law for the administration or disposal of the estate of a deceased person (see WILL or TESTAMENT), It is also used generally for "government", and specifically for "the government" or the executive ministry, and as such connexions as the administration (administrating or tendering) of the sacraments, justice, oaths, medicine &cc." end of definition copied point to point. 5657:, I think creating a "foreign powers" heading under "power structure" is a good idea, and the elements you propose all seem like fine additions. To be honest, I think the entire "power structure" section is a bit of a mess - it's very strange that the "separation" heading was linked to "separatism" and I am removing that link, as well as the link of the "integration" heading to "supranational union", which gives the EU as example while that does not at all fit in with the elements under that heading. 2930:(aristocracy (if written limitations, constitutional, otherwise popular) or it could be a democracy, direct or indirect. It's legal system could be republican or authoritarian, that is are the laws made up by the authorities at whim or are they written down and applied predictably? If they are objective/fairly enforced, then are the law enforcers selected by the people or the law makers? if people, presidential, if enforcers are selected by law makers, parliamentary. What do you guys think? 646:...you see my point. Our disagreement seems to be mainly on the function of a template. You seem to see it as a roadmap for efficiently guiding people to the article of their selection. I see it as a tool for showing readers the range of options they have vis a vis a particular subject. If we limit the template to well known forms of government, then arguably useful concepts like "Kritarchy" will never become common knowledge because the readers will never think to look for them. 2092:

for me there are many individuals who contentiously want eradicate the difference for the sake of their fear of their truthful intentions or simply to avoid public respond to their laziness in financially privileged position. Public service is a duty, act of social trust and can be a proud for honest worker, however not many grow up to the important position. Spoiled people in social trusty position deserve simple pejorative mark in form of word BUREAUCRAT.

486:," where all philosophical forms of government are available. All of the concepts are valuable, although I think we can all agree that the template should not be an exhaustive list. Therefore, I think it is reasonable to discuss which qualities make an item fit for inclusion into the template, instead of assuming that all items should be included. The criterion used for the items suggested above are functioning governmental systems that are in practice. -- 99: 619:. For the purposes of this template, I have suggested reducing the scope of the template and discussing which qualities make an item fit for inclusion into the template-- in order to accomplish what I mention above-- organizing and presenting information to readers in a way that furthers its dissemination, accessibility, and understanding. I have suggested including items that are functioning governmental systems in current practice. Thanks, -- 151: 130: 2374:

enter yours. The reader will judge which the valid one is. WHY deprive reader valuable resources of information? Hmm... It is not ethical to kill FREEDOM of INFORMATION. Look somewhat like Communist censorship! I do not have license for only true, as well as you do not. Also, if majority has one opinion does not it mean it does not mean it is the CORRECT one. Only by freedom of speech the true goes up for the benefit of all.--

5568: 3124: 3057: 2988: 161: 282:. As an overview of basic and practical concepts, I believe that the template should provide navigation to functional systems of government, and the theoretical concepts should be removed. If we can't gain a concensus to reduce the template based on the broader concepts of government, then I suggest that we make a seperate navigational template for theoretical/philosophical forms of government. For example, 2107:

appears. Unnecessary is coexistence democracy with bureaucracy, but coexistence aristocracy, technocracy, authoritarianism, plutocracy, autocracy etc. with forms of monarchy, democracy, dictatorship, republic etc. in many combinations. You can imagine some examples for yourself. It is only a question if the people of a nation perceive strong tendency to the second unofficial-underground government.

4616:"Empire" seems to be in there as an example of "integration", that is, a nation conquering other nations and "integrating" them into itself. "Integration" is there as one of three ways multiple nations can be one whole, with the other two being "separation" and "federalism". So "empire" isn't really there as a basic form of government on its own, but more an example of something. Kind regards from 642:

Nonetheless, it is the position I advocate, and I think it would be at least as difficult to get consensus on each item indivicually, as your position would require. The aformementioned anarchism debate illustrates this point. Basically, I think the problem is that your system of categorizing systems according to theoretical versus extant forms of government constitutes original research.

2219:

removing technocracy and meritocracy from the template, and establishing criteria for the template where only terms that refer to basic forms of oligarchy, in which a country has been identified by reliable sources to have that form (such as aristocracy, plutocracy, military junta, timocracy, and possibly stratocracy) may be included. What do you think of this inclusion criteria? –

4248:, I object for two reasons: (1) This is a template that links to different articles and "pathocracy" doesn't have its own article. (2) This template is called "Basic forms of government", so it should contain... basic forms of government. I don't think "pathocracy" is considered a basic form of government, in part because it doesn't even have its own article. Kind regards from 1931:, from bureau + -cratie -cracy First Known Use: 1818.” - As you see this word was used before Max Weber and much later than the ADMINISTRATION. We will see Max Weber attempt to change the initial meaning. Should he, or have rights to do so? I do not think so. This was on turn of XIX and XX century in specific climate of German Empire this are not good credentials, I think. 2122:

country entirely governed by aristocracy (mostly it was monarchy supported by aristocracy), or country governed by technocracy, or meritocracy etc. & so on. However, these above forms coexist with official form. Aristocracy, technocracy, and meritocracy are rooted in the “Template: Forms of government” - on the same merit I introduced bureaucracy as oligarchy.

1648:. There are reports of matriarchies existing over thousands of years; not all are verified, but the subject figures prominently in thealogy and in 1960s–1980s U.S. discourse, especially among women, and is discussed in anthropology, history, popular culture, and animal studies. I'll be glad to add it if there's no objection. Thanks. 1519:

template, and it apparently doesn't try to be nearly complete.) The lists and index have to be maintained, too. While categories are automatically populated, lists and indexes have to be maintained manually. An index is much like a list. Both (unlike categories) can be annotated. Both are begun much the way any new article is begun.

547:

should not try to steer the readers toward what we presume they most want to read about. Instead, we should put the obscure alongside the mundane and let readers choose their own path. The only good rationale I see for shortening the list is that it may take up too much space on the page. So just make a collapsible template.

4739:, I tend to agree - maybe we should make the individual sections (power structure/source/ideology) collapsible, and make it the default to only show the section that contains the 'current page' (the page the template is transcluded on). I think I've seen it be done that way in other "Series" templates. Kind regards from 2100:…but I do not see why this means that it is a form of government. For example, the executive branch of the United States has numerous officials who without doubt are accused all the time of "using power for the good of their 'class'" -- does that then mean the United States is not a democracy, but rather a bureaucracy? 3988:

individual, whereas totalitarianism and authoritarianism do not necessarily have to exist beneath one individual, so autocracy shouldn't be representing the group of five. A dictatorship is not necessarily totalitarian, and totalitarianism can be oligarchic in nature, so totalitarianism cannot be at the top.

2405:

Burham (inclusind associated ips), to put it mildly, does not appear to be a native English speaker, and so it seems to me that his understanding of English and the word "bureaucracy" is informed by formal education or language instruction. As for the other editors (and I would include myself here),

2401:

I read the previous discussions above between Burham and others, and it seems to me that the dispute is over the implication of the word "bureaucracy" over administration on its independence: ie: does a bureaucracy have the effective free reign to actually rule? My opinion: This is a symantic issue,

2158:

My apologies for not responding sooner, but I have been affected by Hurricane Sandy and have had little time to be on Knowledge (XXG) the past week. I appreciate your arguments, but I still believe my rationale is stronger--that "bureaucracy" is not a form of government, but rather a derogatory label

2755:

is not a type of government. I do not know why all these redundant terms are in here. But this template is severly bloated and should probably be, at least, halved. I thought it best to come here first, as maybe there is some reason for having these excess terms here, and I didn't want to be rude by

2654:

I just stumbled across this and there are many changes I would make. Remove either Patriarchy or Androcracy, they are both the same thing (male rulers) although Patriarchy is a better page Androcracy is the actual term for the rule of government (although matriarchy is used instead of Gynocracy). So

2578:

Thanks for sharing your thoughts Nick. What you've said makes sense. What I was torn between is whether we should have a one-to-one relationship between the template and the article or a one-to-many relationship. I can see pros and cons with both approaches, but I don't feel strongly either way.

2543:

I have a question/concern about when changes are made to the list. When new forms are added to the list, we should try to make sure that the corresponding article gets this template placed in it. Conversly, when a link is removed from this template, we should remove the template from that article,

2251:

and reading the above, I agree with Prototime that the arguments for considering bureaucracy a feature of government, rather than a separate type of government, are considerably stronger. In particular, listing it under "oligarchy" is misleading, because all modern governments, whether oligarchic or

2218:

I actually agree with you concerning technocracy and meritocracy; I don't believe that any country actually has a form of government known as "technocracy" or "meritocracy", though governments may have features that could be described as technocratic or meritocratic. For consistency, I would be fine

2190:

Thank you for you responds Prototime. Since are you busy with other issues it is reasonable to involve some other interested more free to discuss the subject. I am open to resolve the problem point by point, in systematic way – tabularizing, and adjusting all facts and trends. One word, however, if

2091:

I am happy you got this conclusion. It is essentially my big concern that there exists strong and fearsome opposition to recognize the difference between word bureaucracy and administration. As much I experience the striking opposition; it convinces me to straggle against it more. That indicates

1848:

scientific articles and logical arguments, but simply because an editor asserts that his or her view is scientifically or logically sound does not end the discussion if other editors remain unconvinced. Personally, I appreciate your argument, but thus far I am unpersuaded by it, and I do not believe

1728:

irrespective of the form of government. And it most certainly isn't a type of oligarchy; few would disagree with applying the term to the executive branches of representative democracies like the United States. Here are several dictionary definitions of the term "bureaucracy," all of which indicate

795:

Finally, I do not suggest "getting consensus on each item individually," nor did I ever ask specifically about anarchism. Determining criteria for inclusion into the template removes the burden of individual debate. No one has has wanted to discuss defining this criteria so far, which is what I am

4030:

Then re-do the template. Something so ambiguous as forms of government should not be characterized into mere groups when they can overlap one another. The main forms of a government are: Democracy, Autocracy and Oligarchy. Monarchy can overlap with Autocracy, or even Oligarchy. Authoritarianism and

3169:

Hello. This template as it currently stands seems a bit tall and space-grabbing. How about the first version opposite, which reduces its height without losing (or changing) any of its content? Or the second, which introduces an "Authoritarian" subsection? (The third is the current template, for the

2409:

In common American English parlance, bureaucracy is associated with red tape, inneficiency, administration, and government in general, but it's not associated with agency: the word doesn't imply independence of the bureaucrat or bureaucracy: It's taken for granted that the bureaucrat or bureaucracy

2373:

Dear Prototime, Show me rather that the consensus had been made on the base of Knowledge (XXG) rules and PARTICULARY what in this consensus is so logical that should sustain. Do not accuse me for obstinacy at illogical point of view. We will disagree with a point I will enter my arguments, you will

1815:

You say: "Furthermore, even though Knowledge (XXG) not a democracy, it is appropriate to allow other editors to contribute to the discussion when attempting to build consensus." Obviously it is, but the users should use scientific argument not saying NO or YES as above. YES or NO is just voting but

1798:

You say: "I was upholding a previously-established consensus among editors (as indicated on the template talk page) that bureaucracy does not belong in the template." I introduced the bureaucracy on 29 September and you removed it. I do not see previous enters of 'bureaucracy' thus it is not for me

1792:

I repeat the basic word orgine as was done on your page: "Please review the definition provided in original article "Bureaucracy" as well as origin of the word "bureau – desk or office and gr. κράτος kratos – rule or political power." It is equal to term Techno-cracy, Aristo-cracy etc. It should be

546:

I disagree. I think templates need to be as broad and inclusive as possible. Hiding "esoteric" concepts will ensure that they remain esoteric, and I find that counter to the spirit of the wiki. The overarching purpose of Knowledge (XXG) is to make knowledge more easily accessible to more people. We

4117:

I think that "Territorial Jurisdiction Structure" is more apropriate, "power structure" reminds me about structural paradigm for social organisations / institutions (like hierachy or non-hierarchy), and not about the spatial subdivision of administrative powers. And besides all the articles listed

3302:

I suspect we may have to agree to disagree about hanging dots, at least for the time being, as they appear ungainly to me. I don't believe they're necessary to indicate an ongoing list or delimit every item in that list. I can imagine an adaptation, though, which I think would accommodate both our

2563:

I agree on the former but disagree on the latter. It turns out that the number of notable forms of government (and forms subsumed under others that are notable) is too large for a template that has to fit within an article, so we have to be even more selective than we would be if we applied merely

2270:

Dear Sandstein, All governments employs administration; it is other question if the executive branch will switch to bureaucracy or not i.e. if become using their power illegally. You are mistaken. Please read the arguments what differ between bureaucracy from administration. I will not revert you

2121:

Well I will not go to such think. There is always a stalk of doubts and personal judgment if such country if purely bureaucratic, particular that the governing power would not like this kind of classification and only the citizen inside knows the true. Beside you probably would not have example of

1936:

Please look also on: “ROBERT K. MERTON emphasized its red tape and inefficiency due to blind conformity to procedures. More recent theories have stressed the role of managerial cliques, occupational interest groups, or individual power-seekers in creating politicized organizations characterized by

5837:

I agree "integration" was a very unclear heading. I think it was intended to mean "states that are one whole" as opposed to federalism where the government consists of multiple semi-independent parts. I can't think of a really good heading, but for now I'll change it to "unitary" which I think is

3982:

of the state and total control over the aspects of the lives of people. Authoritarianism involves the subordination of individual freedom to the power of the state and subjection of the people to authority. Totalitarianism is a form of authoritarianism. Despotism involves the exercise of absolute

2944:

I just want to add, the reason why I made this change: Before, it was just a long, unorganized and frankly confusing list that ignored the relationships between the different forms of government. What I tried to do with my version is create different categories so that the reader knows what is a

2771:

I agree with your proposal. The list is way too long and needs to be simplified to basic common forms of government - specific variants and minor types unnecessarily fill up the list and make it confusing. I would add that the term corporatocracy is under POV dispute for a long time, plus it is a

597:

article should be listed on a collapsible template. How does that make things easier for a reader? I simply don't see how this would benefit anyone, nor how it furthers the spirit of Knowledge (XXG), particularly when related information is already separated into entire category and subcategory

578:

Additionally, the nav template has expanded in size because people found the concepts and added them, so I disagree with your assertion that readers need a template to access the articles. I am sure we can agree it is possible that too large a template can make accessing concepts cumbersome. In

3273:

hanging dots are a feature, not a problem. they show that it is a single list, and they delimit the list. as far as line-spacing goes, this is only a problem if you try to mix non-list elements with list elements, or if you use only non-list elements. this problem exists when you use a <br:

2929:

These categories are broad and may define governments, past present and future, without regard to who is in power. It is simply a framework. For example, you could have a government that is structurally unitary or federal or confederal, it's power is justified by virtue of the people in charge

2106:

Well I did not say that any particular country is “not a democracy, but rather a bureaucracy”. It is not necessary to see a bureaucracy in a pure, singular form in an existence. There are always, and in many circumstances examples where the second, more or less unofficial, underground government

1834:

The previously-established consensus of which I referenced on my talk page concerns the discussion above that included IP user 82.231.12.81 and Adrian J. Hunter, where it was established that "bureaucracy" is not a form of government. Granted, it was not the most thorough of conversations, but a

1518:

Lists and an index have been created and are linked to from the bottom of the template. This is so not every article has to be in the template. (A list is linked to in this template, too, but I managed to miss it and thought it wasn't there, since it reads like a partly redundant heading for the

1461:

I don't completely agree with the idea that the size of this template should be reduced too much. First, we must make consensus on the usage of this template. I think this template is made to list types or forms of government and to make it clear that how to assort a government of a country into

289:

None of this is meant to disparage anyone's favorite governmental philosophy. We can all agree that nav templates cannot always contain every single topic-- they must touch on the "biggies." Additionally, I think the concept of this template has been lost by veering into the theoretical. That

2358:

I think our conversation/cooperation do not goes well. 1) You change my edits 2)I ask you why 3)you ask me for explanation which is already given on Talk above, and 4)Change my edit again 5) I ask you for consideration 6) you keep silence 7)I change edit since lack of you activity and you start

3246:

Thanks for pointing this out. hlist/plainlist seem to bring some quirks of their own (e.g. handling line-spacing and those hanging dots) but what do you make of the templates as now modified? (And, would you prefer the one including the "Authoritarian" subsection, or no change at all?) Perhaps

2050:

I appreciate your elaboration of your reasoning. (On a side note, I'm glad to see you have registered an account! I hope this means you'll be sticking around as an active Wikipedian.) Concerning this discussion, I appreciate you laying out the origins of the word, but I do not believe that the

5660:

I don't think everything now under "separation" belongs under "foreign powers" - in particular, it seems that a chiefdom is something in between a tribe and a state, according to our article on it. Also, I'm not so sure about your simultaneous addition of "client state" and "puppet state" and

1526:

Where there are groups of links, the groups may be presented as collapsed, so users can open just the groups they want to see. Grouping would also allow adding links for, say, articles about theorists who write about classifications, multiform overview articles, and so on. The template may be

1491:

When mostly alphabetically arranged, it serves mainly to remind readers of what they already know; as it gets longer, people will look at what they expect to find and skip the rest, and I think it's already too long in terms of popular usability. Plus, if a reader already knows what a form of

717:

Second, our disagreement about the function of a template is true only in this case. There are many nav templates that can reasonably contain all relevant topics within a certain sphere, and I thoroughly advocate that they function that way. This is not such a case. In this case, it is not

3987:

person has unlimited authority over others. A dictatorship is a form of government where absolute power is exercised by a dictator. All of these may be classified under authoritarianism to some extent, but the same does not apply under autocracy, which is too limited. Autocracy refers to one

2287:

I introduced the same text as above on the template talk page, also. My simple point is a suggestion for you to recognize the difference between words administration and bureaucracy. They are not synonyms, thus if bureaucracy has pejorative meaning cannot be employed regularly by any kind of

447:

It looks like you are giving it more thought than me. However, as you can see from the above, there has been an extended conversation regarding the inclusion of Anarchism. I noticed you left it out. You may want to review the reason that have been identified for including it. I find them

4765:

I have made it collapsible now, but I have left the default to stay expanded to cause minimum disruption upon all the articles this is currently used on. Just add the parameter "expanded=collapsed" to the template and it will collapse the sub-sections. It will also expand to the appropriate

1522:

The template groups links, with a heading for each group. I'm not sure how to group forms of government, unless political scientists have a standard classification scheme already, and even so this may be too hard or too nonintuitive to implement. The existing list has a scheme but it seems

1492:

government is called, there's a good chance they'll type it into the search box or into the URL, although the present system helps with spelling. And the lack of word wrap, at least for spaceless strings, is beginning to create a problem, as the template gets wider and bumps main text down.

796:

asking to do. I have made the introductory suggestion that we reduce the scope of the template, using the criterion of functioning governmental systems that are in practice. If you do not prefer that criterion, then let us work together to define criteria and gain a consensus. Thanks, --

641:

I did read your whole comment, but I think that relegating the less-than-well-known forms of government to the list page, even if the list page is the first thing on the template, constitutes "hiding" them, in practice. I understand that getting consensus on this position may be difficult.

739:

Additionally, it isn't just "theoretical vs. extant." Attempting to categorize these concepts unavoidably engages theory. (I do think a new nav template for theory is in order, though). The argument is not as complicated as you make it out to be-- many of the items currently listed are

522:. I would prefer not to address that debate in this section, in order that this section can remain focused on scope of the Forms of Government template. As I mentioned, I think it is productive to discuss which qualities make an item fit for inclusion into the template. Thanks, -- 4130:

Democracy and change it's description to "power of all" (instead of this misleading "power of none" wich concerns the negative aspects of the anarchist philosophy about "no one should rule the others" and not it's positive aspects that "everyone should participate"). What you think

4700:

Maybe it is a difference of usage. The only way I have ever seen meritocracy used is as a way to select and reward talent, not as a way to run a country, but as way to run a project. As I see it meritocracy opposes nepotism, but not say democracy. Of course this could be cultural.

2163:

any type of government; however, I have little time at present to further engage in discussion on the point, and I cannot be very active on Knowledge (XXG) in the immediate future. As you and I are the only editors involved in this conversation at present, I have requested a

4051:

Be advised that I just added Chinese Legalism under monarchy for your consideration. It is, in any case, a basis of Chinese monarchy. I would also like to point out it's origination of things like the written examination, as detailed on the page, which admittedly needs more

1921:

Please do not attach you self to “an administrative policy-making group” should they make policies for yourself :) This is the question? Rather they should serve interest of public (I do not return to monarch by obvious reason) - I prefer to stay in modern politic system –

1581:

For valid links, to achieve further selectivity, notability is hard to exceed. I'm not clear how to define an objective supernotability standard. Maintaining a comprehensive list or index gives us an excuse to be subjective for supernotability for explicit inclusion in the

1891:

As you will see the word administration has no pejorative meaning and much older origin then bureaucracy (which I will discuss next). Take for consideration the word government is in quote marks and serve + executive words used for description of the functionality of Lat.

1989:

The first known English-language use was in 1818. The 19th-century definition referred to a system of governance in which offices were held by unelected career officials, and in this sense "bureaucracy" was seen as a distinct form of government, often subservient to a

3802:. If you were to change "Islamic state" to "Christain state", "Quran" to "Bible", and "Caliph" to some Christian equivalent, most would call it a theocracy. Why is a Caliphate any different? Should it be removed from the list? I propose that Caliphate be removed from 4008:

Also, if your problem is that authoritarianism is not a noun form way of referring to a state, that is because there is not a word that actually refers to "authoritarianism" in the form of an actual state. The closest alternative I can find is "authoritarian state".

1743:

Free Online Dictionary, thefreedictionary.com/bureaucracy a. Administration of a government chiefly through bureaus or departments staffed with nonelected officials. b. The departments and their officials as a group: promised to reorganize the federal bureaucracy.

2195:

any type of government" what to do with technocracy, meritocracy and similar oligarchic groups grabbing power . For example the technocracy can be less visible (less formally organized) but existing within any type of government, communist, democratic or military

1839:

was reached nonetheless. I have stated that my position is also that bureaucracy is not a form of government, and given reasons that I believe to be logical. Now you have stated your view, which is different, and provided your reasons for it. But, like it or not,

3853:

again. "Caliphate" is defined in the article as an "Islamic state". For Sunni Islam, the caliph is selected by election (democracy?) for the Shia Islam, the caliph is "appointed by God". Either way, I fail to see how a Caliphate is a "Basic form of government"

3528:

Hi, Jim1138. Looking at earlier threads on the talkpage here, it seems the (over)growth of this template has been a problem, so I haven't included the "Pejorative" subsection in the more compact version just installed as I'm not convinced its contents count as

826:

Some quick comments . . . Regarding hidden vs not hidden, surely it's not a categorical question, but rather one of degree. I'm not sure yet where I fall on the implications of the qualities versus forms discussion. I do agree with Lmbstl when he/she writes,

2023:

On the other hand democracy is defined as: "government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system", thus not by non-elected

1542:

Another solution is to lay the template out horizontally, rather than vertically, and place it at the bottom of a page, and that might save room for more links, but that requires moving the template on all the articles that use it, which is quite a

3878:

The new list is a great improvement but it still has a few issues. For instance constitutional monarchies belong to both monarchies and democracies, and there isn't a category for republics, which is something a lot of readers will be looking for.

2579:

You seem to be for the latter, which sounds fine, as long as it's applied relatively consistenly. In terms of the length of the list, that's a discussion I'm staying out of for now because I don't have any good insights as to how to solve it. --

4164:

I think it's fine to keep it last but "power of none" doesn't make much sense—more like "sovereignty of none". Agreed that "power of all" is closer but still misleading. What basis/sourcing are we using to justify the "power of x" construction?

2413:

This isn't a justification, but merely an observation: Burham's arguments that the constituent parts of bureaucracy: buearu and ocracy, really should imply government by and for a buearu, in my experience, that's just not how the word is used.

2288:

government. A government employ executive branch (i.e. administration, which by definition cannot replace or usurp legislature function). - Also this text I copy to talk of the template, and I will continue the conversation there as you wish.--

1723:

I agree with the above editors. Irrespective of the "-cracy" ending in the word, it does not describe a form of government--democracies, oligarchies, and monarchies can all have "bureaucracies," which are government officials and bodies that

1975:

The late M. de Gournay...sometimes used to say: "We have an illness in France which bids fair to play havoc with us; this illness is called bureaumania." Sometimes he used to invent a fourth or fifth form of government under the heading of

866:

However, I think the criteria for inclusion should be "commonly DISCUSSED concepts that describe a power structure and the application of that structure to citizens" (rather than commonly USED), and therefore anarchy should be included.

2548:, which has since been removed from the list, but the template remains on the Nanny state page. Not questioning the removal of nanny state from the list, just want to make sure the template matches the articles and vice versa. -- 3275:

delimited list and try to add newlines in the list. the work-around is to wrap content in div tags as you have done. the other option is to use dfn lists when there is a heading, using the ; and : syntax instead of * syntax.

1876:

But even in monarchy (which I dislike,) administration can be just passive 'machine' without ability (i.e. highly controlled by monarch) to seize power for their own class advantage. In this case I call this passive but yet

2382:) 03:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC) PS. You and other editors can believe on all kind of thinks, believe is not a fact, is not reality, and most important is not scientific. Knowledge (XXG) is not collection of believes. Is it?-- 2359:

active contra immediately 8)I ask you to read TALK and respond consecutively you do nothing - no even with info you have difficulties with reading. CONCLUSION: I feel it is unreasonable PLAY. From now I will react quickly.--

592:

exists for a reason-- to provide readers with a complete list of forms of government, real and philosophical, as they exist on Knowledge (XXG). It is the first item on the template. By your rationale, every item in the

2017:

A government is defined as: "the political direction and control exercised over the actions of the members, citizens, or inhabitants of communities, societies, and states; direction of the affairs of a state, community,

2125:

It would be very problematic to find even the Mandarin China purely bureaucratic. It was monarchy funded on privileged newly created class for the monarch convenience, but soon bureaucrats become managing the Emperor

579:

invoking "spirit of the wiki," you overlook that this whole system is one of organizing and presenting information to readers in a way that furthers dissemination, accessibilty, and understanding of the information.

4202:, where I removed this template, because it is not considered a basic form of government by any source in the article. Consequently, I've removed a link to the article from this template. Then I did the same with 4142: 1849:

that the view that myself and the previous two editors have is illogical or unscientific. That being said, let's discuss more, and I'm happy to hear the views of other editors and have a robust conversation. –

2796:

Everybody seems to be dissatisfied with the current list, so Here's an idea, tell me what you think. Let's classify governments according to three properties: Power Structure, Power source, and legal system.

258:

Am I the only one who thinks that the template should be reduced in size? There are some really esoteric concepts that do not really exist in modern practical politics. I am not suggesting that the idea of

1599:

Redlinks shouldn't last long, if present at all. At first, they encourage writing articles. After a while, they may represent nonnotability or other cause for article deletion. Stubs are a workable interim

4538:" is, since ... it is a pretty commonly used word, and well-known, and notable ... so I could have just (slapped the side of my head, like the guy in that "I could've had a V-8!" commercial, and) done a 2945:

subset of what, and also is able to tell that multiple terms are needed to describing each state. Hopefully any objections people may have can be answered without going back to having a confusing list.

698:"If we limit the template to well known forms of government, then arguably useful concepts like "Kritarchy" will never become common knowledge because the readers will never think to look for them." 3900:

This should keep the list the same lenght as it is now, but better presenting where republic and monarchy comes in and that they are only mutily exclusive with eachother not Democracy for instance.

4568:(It's in a paragraph that starts out "I missed my slipstick." The next sentence says, "Dad says that anyone who can't use a slide rule is a cultural illiterate and should not be allowed to vote.") 2776:. I will put through your changes. I legitimize these changes with the basis that historical political theorists, including Aristotle have narrowed down the forms of government to a small list.-- 2303:

Dear Sandstain, Since I did not received you answer, for 10 days, with support of you opinion: "every government employs bureaucracy" I feel free to return the 'Bureaucracy' word where belongs.--

2687:

is crap, it seems to be some sort of term for an Islamic theocracy. Or is it an Autocracy? I'm not sure but it clearly isn't a type of government it is a sub-type of one of those other types.

39: 2085:

I agree that "bureaucracy", compared to "administration," has a negative connotation and perhaps suggests that the career bureaucrats are self-interested in performance their duties, …

674:"I think that relegating the less-than-well-known forms of government to the list page, even if the list page is the first thing on the template, constitutes "hiding" them, in practice." 2318:

Sorry, I forgot to answer. I reverted your edit again, because I am not familiar with a reliable source that names bureaucracy as a form of government. Can you cite such a source? (Per

4178:

I changed anarchism's and the three others to consistently use "rule of ..."; it was "government of none" but that isn't really English, so it's now "rule of none". Kind regards from

274:. Many of the items on the template refer to qualities inherent in basic forms of government. It seems the dividing line is this: There is a difference between forms of government 3682: 1871:

I agree that all democracy, monarchy, and oligarchy have administration, but unnecessary bureaucracy, which is an spoiled administration i.e. using its power for good of their class.

482:. I just don't see where anarchism exists as a part of a social consensus in governing a world country. Additionally, the first item listed on the template as I have suggested is " 5688: 700:

Do you really believe this? I do not assume readers to be so ignorant, nor do I assume that a template is the only way of accessing information, as I have already addressed above.

300:

I propose the following for the template as concrete, functional systems of government: concepts that describe a power structure and the application of that structure to citizens:

861:

I agree with the main aspect of the proposal; the list in the box should be greatly reduced. "Hiding" should not be an issue as the box is a navigational aid, not a complete list.

2029:

Thus I beleave I logicaly prooved the Bureaucracy is (can be - if sombody accept sourcess etc.) a form of GOVERNMENT in concurency with legal/official one and usualy undergroud.

607:

Either we assume all items should be listed on the template, or we agree that some items should be left out. I think it would be hard to gain a consensus that all items in the

611:

article should be listed on a template. That means some articles will be listed on the template, and some will not. A systemic issue here is categorizing forms of government

722:

page listed on a nav template, which you advocate. Therefore, some concepts will be listed, others will not. By what criteria are concepts listed now? No one seems to know.

5596: 3915:

Hello, Carewolf – I think the level addressed by this template is higher / more abstract than you describe. For instance, there isn't a category (a section) for republics as

4031:

Totalitarianism can fall under anyone of those categories, including a Democracy. Whose idea was it to summarize all of this into a template? This is not black and white.

1751:

1. Government by many bureaus, administrators, and petty officials. 2. The body of officials and administrators, especially of a government or government department.

778:

truly exists. In this case, the template actually serves to label qualities as governmental systems, which I find problematic because it can genuinely be misleading.

4291:

maybe my recent experience does not indicate some fault in (nor even some "room for improvement" in) this infobox^H^H^H "sidebar". (Is a "sidebar" ... kinda like an

4480:

entry there -- (not counting a hatnote, and a handy "Wiktionary" entry link, and a TOC and a "List") -- was an entry that said that a "A type of monarchy:".

3152: 3085: 3016: 644:

Does direct democracy exist in fact? Has a communist state ever existed? By whose definition of communism? Is aristocracy form of government or a social system?

239:

It's called basic forms of government. I don't think it was meant to be a bloody master list. It should only be there to lead to other, more in-depth templates.

74: 4558: 217: 3467:

Going by the threads above, it may well have been in there once but then omitted (along with other variations) to keep the template's size from growing...

3835:

Well maybe not - I don't think that editor understands or maybe doesn't accept our policies and guidelines. I've removed it as it clearly doesn't belong.

5904: 5899: 5869: 5627: 4813: 4284:

The main reason for my lack of success (in the little 'episode' recounted below) might be (in the opinion of some) ... my own ignorance. If so, then

207: 1970:, and was a satirical perjorative from the outset. Gournay never wrote the term down, but was later quoted at length in a letter from a contemporary: 5027: 4149: 4576:" from this template, once I determined (by using 'Ctrl-F' to do a search! ... for example) that this template does not seem to have an entry for " 80: 2168:

on the issue. I will not revert your addition of bureaucracy to the template at least until we have receive a third opinion from another editor. –

1967: 680:

article are "relegated"? I disagree. And, by your rationale, anything not on a nav template is as good as hidden. We all know that is not true.

1776:

As I say this is not a question how many users agree with you definition. This question of logic, history and origin of the word. Do you agree?--

2524:

We have whole Knowledge (XXG) articles dedicated to that. I will be adding it shortly. Also, if they don't exist, then what do you call them? --

5909: 3533:

forms of government. You can still add it again though (after the "Authoritarian" subsection, I'd suggest) if you feel its contents are basic.

1816:

not building consensus. Besides, it is expected that any user will accept reasoning/logic instead being obstinate and NEGATE up to a death :)--

4721:

Put simply this template is way too long and it could benefit from the content being initially hidden, as is (de facto) uniform for templates.

474:

The conversation you refer to has an entirely different premise. The premise here is this: there is a difference between forms of government

183: 4591:

Is the above "use case" too "quirky" or "eccentric" (or weird) to mean that a change to this template would be advisable? That could be ...

1941: 1897: 1817: 1800: 1777: 3712: 3643: 3570: 3534: 3468: 3419: 3347:

yes, dfn means definition, you can create definition lists using the ; and : in wikimarkup, although with hlist, it works best in navboxes,

3333: 3313: 3252: 3171: 2143:

Dear Prototime, Since I did not received you answer up to now for my arguments I feel free to introduce Bureaucracy as form of Oligarchy.--

1754:

Given this reasoning, I agree with the above editors that "bureaucracy" is not a form of government and should stay out of this template. –

565:

Hello Aelffin, Let me be clear: I do not suggest hiding anything. As you can see above, the very first item on the suggested template is "

392:

Before I go through each concept on the template one by one, I wanted to get everyone's thoughts before I reduce the template. Thanks, --

3606:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

1505:

As an alternative, but at a trade-off of proposing more work than keeping the status quo, consider what's done for the feminism sidebar (

5709:

Interesting... it seems the "power structure" section could benefit from drawing some inspiration from that template. Kind regards from

3760: 5819:: Before my edit, there was "integration". Well, you can remove "separation" completely or replace it with something more reasonable.-- 2055:

a bureaucracy. Do you think that to be the case? And can you identify any country that, according to a reliable source, has its entire

5582: 4355: 3803: 3639: 1690: 1079: 24: 2115:

And can you identify any country that, according to a reliable source, has its entire form of government labeled as a "bureaucracy"?

3145: 3078: 3009: 2474: 519: 1729:

that the term does not refer to a form of government itself, but rather it describes administrative persons, bodies, and processes

174: 135: 20: 2529: 4448: 1962:

The term "bureaucracy" is French in origin, and combines the French word "bureau" – desk or office – with the Greek word κράτος

69: 5467: 2635:

The list shown is way too long. It takes up multiple pages in length. It needs to be shortened to common forms of government.--

2621: 2228: 2177: 2068: 2013:":Bureaucracy may also be defined as a form of government: "government by many bureaus, administrators, and petty officials. 1858: 1763: 569:," where all philosophical forms of government are equally available. I am concerned that you did not read this whole section. 3642:– To match the template's established title (and scope). A tendency toward "template bloat" is reported in the threads above. 110: 5274: 5229: 4394:", I did not get past the second sentence before I wanted to start clicking again. The second sentence of the article about " 598:

designations in a uniform system available to all users (where "the obscure" rests "alongside the mundane," as you advocate).

60: 407:

Hi Lmbstl, you may want to read the talk section on Anarchism and the Anarchism talk page, if you have not already. Cheers,

5100: 4559:

https://books.google.com/books?id=BG3SjVi5AvAC&q=cultural+illiterate#v=snippet&q=cultural%20illiterate&f=false

4549:

to me, that a "A type of monarchy:" ... because ... it is common knowledge, to anyone who is not a cultural illiterate.

425:

Hello Doright, I just looked over the page you suggested. What are your thoughts in relation to my above suggestions? --

4206:, because there it is also clear from the article that it isn't considered a basic form of government. Kind regards from 3635: 3138: 3071: 3002: 3597: 5873: 5619: 5294: 4809: 4330: 4317: 594: 589: 566: 483: 303: 295: 263:

is useless, but it is not in existence as a "Form of Government" compared to a monarchy, dictatorship, republic, etc.

3773:

Possibly, maybe under a new heading ("Theory"?). But might that invite more and more links, bloating the template..?

3686: 2406:

they appear to be native speakers, and their understanding of the word "bureaucracy" is informed by popular culture.

5115: 2606: 1387: 3197: 2165: 1956:

Here is the history of word BUREAUCRACY. For the exactness it is not my work, I just spot it done by sombody else.

3948: 3768: 2402:

reagarding differences in how the word is used, an I think it is visible in the language of the discourse above.

1509: 3897:

I would like to rename Power Structure to Area of Government, and Power Source to Representation of Government.

4865: 3956: 3719: 3647: 3574: 3538: 3472: 3423: 3337: 3317: 3303:

points of view: leaving them there, but making them hidden (visually), e.g. using "visibility:hidden;" styling.

3256: 3175: 2871: 1945: 1901: 1821: 1804: 1781: 1171: 935: 336: 3939:

Could another way to regard "basic forms" of government be by scope/extent/etc, i.e. (in no particular order)

3742: 3607: 116: 5523: 5090: 4606: 3964: 3924: 3764: 2569: 2452: 1940:

Thus most recent theories, (I hope you will see next), return to the origin pejorative meaning from 1818. --

1694: 1668: 1653: 1621: 1560: 1329: 1256: 1022: 993: 374: 360: 3329: 1844:. In the process of building consensus, all of us as editors are free to attempt to persuade other editors 1686: 1067: 5538: 5105: 4670: 4017: 3996: 1448: 1337: 1075: 1027: 872: 379: 3418:

Okay, I have implemented the second of two more compact versions of the template. Thanks for your input.

3384:

as long as we are using hlist/plainlist for lists, I have no preference otherwise concerning the format.

2655:

either merge Androcracy into Patriarchy then remove Androcracy from the list or just remove one of them.

1841: 1836: 1799:"previously-established consensus". Anyway, CONSENSUS has no meaning if deny science and logic. Is it?-- 50: 5746: 5741:

If this is going to be collapsed then it should be automatically. Otherwise, it's essentially pointless.

5533: 5396: 4993: 4726: 3752: 2584: 2553: 1710: 1199: 954: 182:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

286:

really is a philosophical concept that does not describe a functioning structural form of government.

65: 4545:

In fact, (perhaps even more a sign of my own ignorance than the foregoing), maybe it should have been

4503:(via the mere addition of a pair of double square brackets to the second sentence of that article), 3663:

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with

3452:

under the democracy section. It is surprising that the term was not already present in the infobox.--

2322:, if an editor wants to add content, it is their responsibility to provide sources for such content.) 5834: 5824: 5820: 5777: 5706: 5696: 5692: 5654: 5643: 5639: 5638:) 14:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC) Add well remove the "separation" chapter, which links to separatism -- 5635: 5631: 4226: 4080: 4057: 3840: 3826: 2950: 2935: 2913: 2419: 2344:. I will not revert your revert, I left it for you. I think you will act this time less agresively.-- 1266: 244: 4351:") contained (and it still does ... the last time I checked) an instance of this "sidebar" called " 4326:

For reasons that may be outside the scope of this 'anecdote', I clicked on a hyperlink inside that "

4126:

Since this box is organized in terms of "level of civilian participation" Anarchism should be place

4032: 1527:

presented in an article uncollapsed, collapsed, or, I think, with a different status for each group.

5847: 5801: 5756:

It is an easy enough change to change the default, now that the table as a whole is collapsible. -

5718: 5674: 5457: 5366: 5323: 5110: 4875: 4748: 4686: 4654: 4621: 4253: 4211: 4183: 4103: 4036: 2918: 2631:

The list is WAY too long. It takes up too much space in articles. Shoud be shortened and simplified

2224: 2173: 2064: 1854: 1759: 1353: 754:

in the template since it is quite relevant to governmental systems, antithetical or not. However,

719: 677: 608: 5885: 5855: 5828: 5809: 5765: 5750: 5726: 5700: 5682: 5647: 4779: 4756: 4730: 4710: 4694: 4662: 4625: 4610: 4594:

Thanks for your patience if you got through all of this. (perhaps by SKIPPING some parts of it?)

4257: 4238: 4215: 4187: 4173: 4158: 4107: 4061: 4040: 4024: 4003: 3968: 3928: 3909: 3863: 3844: 3830: 3815: 3782: 3723: 3651: 3628: 3578: 3564: 3542: 3522: 3476: 3461: 3427: 3393: 3341: 3321: 3307: 3285: 3260: 3237: 3179: 2954: 2939: 2785: 2765: 2644: 2625: 2588: 2573: 2557: 2533: 2423: 2391: 2368: 2353: 2334: 2312: 2297: 2280: 2264: 2232: 2205: 2181: 2152: 2135: 2072: 2042: 2002: 1949: 1905: 1862: 1825: 1808: 1785: 1767: 1717: 1698: 1672: 1657: 1625: 1564: 1452: 1083: 876: 846: 805: 655: 628: 556: 531: 509: 495: 457: 434: 416: 401: 248: 5095: 4880: 4855: 4706: 4638: 4602: 3960: 3952: 3944: 3920: 3905: 3389: 3281: 3233: 3214: 2761: 2565: 1664: 1649: 1617: 1556: 386: 4565:

of my hard-cover edition, bought 'pre-owned' from the friends of the Phoenix Library years ago).

4071:

I wonder why "gender superstructure" is on top, is not a little bit time-bound as in these days

2475:

http://books.google.com/books?id=KtFI15WCr_8C&lpg=PP1&pg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false

4098:

which conflates the concepts as these article have no explicit content on "power inheritance".

1298: 500:

Thanks for looking at the conversation. For clarification, can you state its premise? Thanks,

5881: 5761: 5528: 5249: 5080: 5032: 4860: 4793: 4775: 4598: 4387:

The reason why I did that has been forgotten and may be irrelevant. (Am I weird? Maybe!...)

4010: 3989: 3859: 3811: 3560: 3552: 3518: 3457: 3204: 3104: 3037: 2968: 1444: 1248: 1071: 988: 868: 842: 651: 552: 505: 453: 412: 355: 46: 2340:

Dear Sandstain, I think you did not read the above discussion, so again this is the sources:

5742: 5361: 5284: 5254: 5128: 4870: 4850: 4736: 4722: 4310: 4295: 3940: 3548: 2866: 2580: 2549: 2387: 2379: 2364: 2349: 2308: 2293: 2276: 2201: 2148: 2131: 2038: 1998: 1324: 1163: 1113: 1017: 930: 898: 801: 624: 527: 491: 430: 397: 331: 1966:– rule or political power. It was coined sometime in the mid-1700s by the French economist 5572: 5545: 5401: 5391: 5188: 5085: 4234: 4053: 3836: 3822: 3798:

was added to this template which I removed, but was reinstated. To me, it appears to be a

3778: 3624: 3251:

should include "subheading" parameters for use within its "content" or "list" sections...

3128: 3061: 2992: 2946: 2931: 2732: 2525: 2415: 1981: 1419: 1345: 1129: 1049: 908: 767: 319: 240: 166: 3732: 2248: 1357:-: may as well just have "republic" and separate the "capitalist" as an "economic system" 2463: 2441: 1913: 1740:

a: a body of nonelective government officials b : an administrative policy-making group

1737: 835:

in the template since it is quite relevant to governmental systems, antithetical or not.

5841: 5816: 5795: 5712: 5668: 5550: 5481: 5386: 5219: 5133: 4742: 4680: 4648: 4617: 4249: 4207: 4199: 4179: 4167: 4154: 4099: 4095: 4091: 4084: 3506: 2781: 2756:

making vast changes to this template when I had not contributed to it before. Thanks.

2660: 2640: 2325: 2255: 2220: 2169: 2060: 1850: 1755: 1465: 1137: 913: 515: 5567: 4465:

of this subsection! of this section of this "Talk:" page! I put it there myself...);

3123: 3056: 2987: 2601:

We should mention it because we also mention the theoretical, and barely known about,

2319: 160: 150: 129: 5893: 5437: 5332: 5234: 5224: 5065: 4702: 4642: 3901: 3385: 3277: 3229: 3189: 2826: 2816: 2757: 2752: 2510: 2498: 2486: 2341: 1748: 1403: 4546: 4523: 4087:

have been added ad-hoc to support the "gender superstructure" bit of the template.

5877: 5757: 5615: 5486: 5413: 5407: 5381: 5376: 5352: 5342: 5279: 5168: 4988: 4912: 4771: 4264:

Unfamiliar with this "template", ... I tried unsuccessfully to use it a certain way

3855: 3807: 3556: 3514: 3453: 3306:

Meanwhile, apologies for ignorance, but I'm guessing a "dfn list" is one of these:

2728: 2700: 2668: 1189: 947: 838: 647: 548: 501: 449: 408: 343: 4531: 4433:(and if so, then readers here, may be able to enlighten me about the reasons why) 5491: 5476: 5418: 5289: 5153: 4952: 4947: 4927: 4917: 4907: 4225:

I'm not sure what the criteria for inclusion is in this template, but I suggest

3501: 2848: 2724: 2704: 2692: 2664: 2656: 2545: 2383: 2375: 2360: 2345: 2304: 2289: 2272: 2197: 2144: 2127: 2034: 1994: 1379: 1225: 1105: 971: 893: 797: 620: 523: 487: 426: 393: 309: 5496: 5452: 5447: 5442: 5428: 5269: 5060: 4942: 4937: 4801: 4348: 4341: 4337: 4245: 4230: 4072: 3774: 3741:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a

3620: 3496: 3491: 3112: 3045: 2976: 2821: 2772:

form of plutocracy which itself is a form of oligarchy at least as defined by

2748: 2744: 2716: 2708: 2696: 2680: 2672: 1645: 1638: 1371: 1306: 1282: 1233: 1217: 1005: 976: 966: 763: 283: 156: 5784:

belong in this template. The executive, judiciary and legislative branch are

4483:

But that was no thanks to the helpfulness (such as it is) of this template!

1092:

Here are some justifications for my including/excluding items from that list:

5299: 5193: 5183: 5178: 5163: 5158: 5148: 5022: 4983: 4972: 4967: 4957: 4922: 4890: 4834: 4829: 4500: 4203: 4148: 4134: 4076: 3891: 3850: 3799: 3795: 3449: 3310:...? If so, it's something I haven't seen before, so thanks for the pointer. 2878: 2861: 2777: 2773: 2736: 2720: 2712: 2684: 2676: 2636: 1411: 1395: 1363: 1290: 1209: 1181: 1153: 1121: 1097: 1044: 1039: 1034: 1000: 961: 942: 923: 903: 888: 775: 324: 314: 291: 260: 5780:: I strongly disagree with your latest edit. The separation of powers does 1391:-: a description of who is in power, not a description of a power structure 1310:-: a description of who is in power, not a description of a power structure 1229:-: a description of who is in power, not a description of a power structure 1141:-: a description of who is in power, not a description of a power structure 294:

is listed is a case in point. Anyway, the template has a direct link to a

3882:

So I would propose adding another category for 'Head of state' that lists

5623: 5371: 4932: 4902: 4845: 4783:

E.g. {{Template:Basic forms of government|expanded=Autocracy}} now gives:

4573: 4572:

So, perhaps I should have just looked for, and clicked on, the link to "

3916: 3887: 3883: 3569:

Apologies. I guess if Burham wants to (try) add(ing) it again, s/he can.

2908: 2740: 2688: 2602: 1437: 1314: 1274: 1238: 1145: 1061: 1010: 981: 918: 367: 348: 179: 5665:

the latter two - I think we should avoid duplication. Kind regards from

2453:

http://books.google.com/books?id=3iSkH1Qf6xsC&pg=PA142&lpg=PA142

5173: 5010: 5000: 4577: 4535: 4516: 4473: 4458: 4441: 4411: 4403: 2663:

appears to actually be a book so shouldn't really be in this template.

831: 750: 4340:". When I clicked on that hyperlink, it took me to the article about " 3983:

authority by a despot. Autocracy refers to a form of government where

2191:

we will label "bureaucracy' as only a "self-interested administration

5337: 4496: 4399: 4395: 4391: 4369: 1882:

ADMINISTRATION is much older word than bureaucracy. It is from Latin

2675:

isn't actually a type of government, it as a way of staging a coup.

4079:

is on the rise worldwide? Further I find that some some links like

1349:-: redundant; both this and the "communist state" define as Marxist 2699:

is a subsection of Anarchism and not itself a type of government.

2009:

And finaly if BUREAUCRACY can be/is defined as form of government:

1427: 1054: 5687:

Agree. The section is a mess. There is a similar structure under

4553:(The phrase "a cultural illiterate" can be seen on page 119 of 3821:

It's a theocracy - I'd like to see the arguments that it isn't.

2252:

not, employ a bureaucracy. I've therefore removed the addition.

4118:

under this section are, in fact, about territorial structures.

3308:

http://www.htmldog.com/guides/htmlintermediate/definitionlists/

2667:

is a type of democracy so should be a subsection of tha tpage.

3919:

itself is the "basic form" of government. Happy New Year etc,

92: 15: 766:

is a quality, and does not describe an integrated system. A

3711:

As no-one's registered any reservations, move as requested?

2679:, not sure what this is but it is not a type of government. 770:

describes an integrated system, despite whether or not its

514:

The direct link to the anarchism debate you referenced is

3596:

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

5689:

Template:Autonomous_types_of_first-tier_administration

3731:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

3326:

PS Do you prefer any of the three layouts opposite?

2539:

Matching Template Changes with Corresponding Articles

2464:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bureaucracy

2442:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bureaucracy

1914:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bureaucracy

1738:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bureaucracy

1705:

I can't see that it is. Not everything that ends in

1515:), which has many subtopics with their own articles: 4418:

click on the link to "kingdom", too!": -->

4313:) that included (near the top) an instance of the " 2671:

doesn't have an entry, but it is locked. Confusing!

178:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 4269:

This "may or may not" be a suggestion for a change

3685:, please explain your reasons, taking into account 3610:. No further edits should be made to this section. 3553:

User_talk:Jim1138#Your_info_not_in_the_lead._Why.3F

4090:Further, "patrilineal power inheritance" links to 3745:. No further edits should be made to this section. 2511:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bureaucracy 2499:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bureaucracy 2487:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bureaucracy 2342:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bureaucracy 1749:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bureaucracy 1683:Since when is bureaucracy a form of government? 4542:of "kingdom", to find my way to that article. 2544:correct? For example, I added the template to 2271:intervention, but I expect logical arguments.-- 1973: 109:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s 4522:For one more thing, maybe it should have been 4457:Eventually I was able to click on a link to " 4336:" template. That hyperlink was displayed as " 1927:What I can see is origin of the word:” French 5630:an so on under the Chapter "Foreign powers"-- 5590: 3200:reasons. if this is a list, then use either 3146: 3079: 3010: 2731:is not a type of government but is a type of 8: 4429:No such luck. Maybe it is intentional that 2751:is not its own type of government. Finally, 4677:of government. Thoughts? Kind regards from 4468:... and, I will readily admit, that once I 4309:I was reading an article (it was about the 2711:although that itself seems to be a type of 2605:. So, we should including Theodemocracy. -- 748:. I certainly would be open to including 5661:"satellite state", as it seems the former 5597: 5583: 5517: 5319: 5053: 4825: 4788: 4557:by Robert A. Heinlein, if you look here: 4364:OK, so far ... no problems. But then, ... 3874:New proposed Classification of governments 3687:Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on article titles 3683:polling is not a substitute for discussion 3153: 3139: 3099: 3086: 3072: 3032: 3017: 3003: 2963: 2159:applied to self-interested administration 124: 5870:List of countries by system of government 4814:List of countries by system of government 4410:Then I wanted to click on the link to " 5466: 5427: 5351: 5322: 5245: 5202: 5124: 5056: 5009: 4966: 4889: 4828: 4799: 4669:Hello, Carewolf. I'm a bit confused by 4094:and "matrilineal power inheritance" to 3110: 3043: 2974: 2434: 1968:Jacques Claude Marie Vincent de Gournay 1912:Looking on Merrian-Webster dictionary 1294:-: merely the "bad form" of aristocracy 829:I certainly would be open to including 718:reasonable to have the contents of the 266:Let's keep in mind that a government's 126: 4398:" includes some contrasts between an " 3225: 3221: 2792:Proposed Classification of governments 2683:is not a type of government. The page 1842:Knowledge (XXG) is based on consensus 1709:belongs in this template. Removed. 1286:-: merely the "bad form" of democracy 172:This template is within the scope of 98: 96: 7: 4347:Now, *that* article (the one about " 4194:Removed corporatocracy and netocracy 3615:The result of the move request was: 3185:I am strongly opposed to the use of 567:Complete list of forms of government 520:here for the discussion on this page 304:Complete list of forms of government 192:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics 5792:of a government. Kind regards from 4461:". (Sure, now! There is one in the 3759:Any relevance to government nav? -- 2703:appears to be a type of Communism. 672:Let's think about this carefully. 115:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 3804:Template:Basic forms of government 3640:Template:Basic forms of government 2659:isn't a type of government. (The) 14: 4390:But once that click took me to " 4338:Devolved parliamentary dependency 1726:administer governmental decisions 45:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 5905:Mid-importance politics articles 5900:Template-Class politics articles 5566: 4487:Maybe this is not a good example 3122: 3055: 2986: 212:This template has been rated as 159: 149: 128: 97: 40:Click here to start a new topic. 5788:forms of government - they are 4198:Hello. I come from the article 2485:Bureaucracy @ Dictionary.com - 516:here on the anarchism talk page 5275:Intergovernmental organisation 5230:Separation of church and state 4731:19:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC) 4711:15:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 4663:13:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC) 3974:Authoritarianism and autocracy 3028: 2497:Government @ Dictionary.com - 2429:Bureaucracy section references 2397:Fourth Opinion (December 2013) 2080:-- In respond to you notices: 1: 5910:WikiProject Politics articles 5856:17:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC) 5829:16:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC) 5810:21:00, 15 November 2020 (UTC) 4587:Any comments would be welcome 4216:17:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC) 4188:18:24, 28 February 2020 (UTC) 3978:Totalitarianism involves the 3910:23:59, 22 December 2014 (UTC) 3675:, then sign your comment with 3652:12:59, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 3629:01:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC) 3579:12:58, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 3565:07:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 3543:06:50, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 3523:08:04, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 3477:06:08, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3462:22:31, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3428:06:41, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 3394:16:14, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3342:06:06, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3322:06:04, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3286:17:18, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3261:05:06, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 3238:19:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 3180:18:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 2955:11:26, 28 December 2011 (UTC) 2940:10:30, 28 December 2011 (UTC) 2786:15:58, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 2747:is not a type of government. 2727:is not a type of government. 2509:Democracy @ Dictionary.com - 2424:04:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 2392:03:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2369:00:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2354:01:42, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 2335:21:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2313:18:45, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2059:labeled as a "bureaucracy"? – 1626:19:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 1565:18:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 195:Template:WikiProject Politics 186:and see a list of open tasks. 37:Put new text under old text. 5886:01:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC) 5766:00:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC) 5751:00:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC) 5727:19:33, 29 October 2020 (UTC) 5701:18:19, 29 October 2020 (UTC) 5683:22:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC) 5648:14:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC) 5072:(socio-political ideologies) 4780:00:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC) 4757:19:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC) 4041:09:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC) 4025:01:22, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 4004:01:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 3783:12:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 3769:10:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 3751: 3724:22:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 3636:Template:Forms of government 2766:18:19, 11 October 2011 (UTC) 2298:19:05, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 2281:15:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 2265:09:18, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2233:15:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2206:01:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 2182:20:52, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 2153:20:32, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 2136:03:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 2073:01:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 2043:04:01, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 2003:03:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1950:03:36, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1906:02:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1863:01:44, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1826:01:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1809:01:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1786:01:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1768:16:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC) 1673:15:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC) 1658:01:48, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 1478:There's no perfect solution. 1453:16:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 1270:-: redundant with Minarchism 1084:16:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 877:16:03, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 615:and qualities of government 478:and qualities of government 278:and qualities of government 5874:List of forms of government 5838:clearer. Kind regards from 5620:Mandate (international law) 5140:(socio-economic ideologies) 4810:List of forms of government 4695:12:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC) 4632:meritocracy and technocracy 4555:Have Space Suit Will Travel 4062:15:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC) 3969:11:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 3929:11:27, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 1221:+: of historical importance 1149:+: of historical importance 676:The concepts listed in the 595:List of forms of government 590:List of forms of government 484:List of forms of government 296:List of forms of government 249:14:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC) 5926: 4258:19:35, 10 March 2020 (UTC) 4239:18:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC) 4174:12:56, 21 April 2019 (UTC) 4108:14:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC) 3791:Is a Caliphate a theocracy 3716:(was 213.246.91.158 above) 3098: 3031: 2626:05:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC) 1959:"==Word Origin and Usage== 1718:13:53, 16 March 2011 (UTC) 847:01:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 218:project's importance scale 5261:(geo-cultural ideologies) 4766:sub-section if "expanded= 4356:Basic Forms of government 4301:... of a certain kind?) 4159:04:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC) 3864:04:05, 26 July 2014 (UTC) 3845:20:57, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 3831:20:52, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 3816:17:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 2645:22:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 2589:21:39, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 2574:01:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 2558:22:37, 5 April 2011 (UTC) 2534:07:16, 2 April 2011 (UTC) 1699:11:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 1415:+: important historically 806:03:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 656:18:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 629:16:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 557:11:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 532:04:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 510:01:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 496:19:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 458:07:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 435:05:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 417:04:46, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 402:18:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 211: 144: 123: 75:Be welcoming to newcomers 25:Basic forms of government 4626:11:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 4611:06:28, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 4507:I could have clicked on 4454:", or whatever it is. 4444:" in this template, or " 4368:I clicked on a link to " 3738:Please do not modify it. 3705:Any additional comments: 3603:Please do not modify it. 2719:appears to be a type of 2520:Readding Communist State 1172:Representative democracy 936:Representative democracy 337:Representative democracy 5524:Administrative division 5468:International relations 4637:(moving this here from 4449:Politics series sidebar 4113:Power structure heading 2695:' so should be merged. 2247:After coming here from 1330:Constitutional republic 1257:Constitutional monarchy 1023:Constitutional republic 994:Constitutional monarchy 375:Constitutional republic 361:Constitutional monarchy 5868:Hi. I added a link to 4372:" from this "sidebar" 1986: 1407:-: not often discussed 1383:-: not often discussed 1375:-: not often discussed 1338:Parliamentary republic 1302:-: not often discussed 1278:-: not often discussed 1028:Parliamentary republic 448:persuasive. Regards, 380:Parliamentary republic 270:is different from its 70:avoid personal attacks 5534:Democratic transition 5397:Self-governing colony 4994:Military dictatorship 4519:" in this template. 4067:Why is gender on top? 3487:Also recently added: 3170:sake of comparison.) 2691:is a self described ' 1200:Military dictatorship 955:Military dictatorship 5772:Separation of powers 4530:exist an article on 4081:patrilocal residence 3753:Plato's five regimes 3226:|bodyclass=plainlist 1267:Night watchman state 617:in theory/philosophy 480:in theory/philosophy 280:in theory/philosophy 175:WikiProject Politics 5458:Supranational union 5367:Dependent territory 5280:National government 4472:the article about " 4229:might be included. 3196:for delimiters for 1937:internal conflict.” 1354:Capitalist republic 720:Forms of government 678:forms of government 609:forms of government 5737:Collapse automatic 4639:User talk:Carewolf 4526:to me, that there 4495:the article about 4476:", just about the 4331:Infobox dependency 4318:Infobox dependency 2707:is just a type of 2057:form of government 1431:+: often discussed 1423:+: often discussed 1399:+: often discussed 1367:+: often discussed 1346:Socialist republic 1341:+: often discussed 1333:+: often discussed 1318:+: often discussed 1260:+: often discussed 1252:+: often discussed 1242:+: often discussed 1213:+: often discussed 1203:+: often discussed 1193:+: often discussed 1185:+: often discussed 1175:+: often discussed 1167:+: often discussed 1157:+: often discussed 1133:+: often discussed 1125:+: often discussed 1117:+: often discussed 1109:+: often discussed 1101:+: often discussed 883:Here are my picks: 387:Single-party state 111:content assessment 81:dispute resolution 42: 5691:in Subordinacy.-- 5607: 5606: 5558: 5557: 5529:Democracy indices 5504: 5503: 5307: 5306: 5116:Semi-presidential 5041: 5040: 4666: 4599:Keep Austin Weird 4143:Гармонический Мир 4122:Anarchism Purpose 3332:comment added by 3167: 3166: 3163: 3162: 3096: 3095: 3027: 3026: 2333: 2263: 1736:Merriam-Webster, 1689:comment added by 1644:I propose adding 1249:Absolute monarchy 1087: 1070:comment added by 989:Absolute monarchy 356:Absolute monarchy 254:Esoteric concepts 232: 231: 228: 227: 224: 223: 198:politics articles 91: 90: 61:Assume good faith 38: 5917: 5854: 5850: 5844: 5808: 5804: 5798: 5725: 5721: 5715: 5681: 5677: 5671: 5599: 5592: 5585: 5571: 5570: 5518: 5362:Associated state 5320: 5295:Internationalism 5285:World government 5262: 5141: 5073: 5054: 5028:Free association 5015: 4976: 4895: 4838: 4826: 4789: 4755: 4751: 4745: 4693: 4689: 4683: 4661: 4657: 4651: 4636: 4601:" -- ! -- ... -- 4499:had contained a 4453: 4447: 4426: 4425: 4421: 4384: 4383: 4379: 4360: 4354: 4335: 4329: 4322: 4316: 4311:Falkland Islands 4300: 4294: 4281: 4280: 4276: 4172: 4170: 4146: 4138: 4021: 4015: 4000: 3994: 3945:central/national 3740: 3679: 3673: 3667: 3605: 3344: 3227: 3223: 3222:|bodyclass=hlist 3219: 3213: 3209: 3203: 3198:wp:accessibility 3194: 3188: 3155: 3148: 3141: 3127: 3126: 3100: 3088: 3081: 3074: 3060: 3059: 3033: 3029: 3019: 3012: 3005: 2991: 2990: 2964: 2618: 2615: 2612: 2609: 2513: 2507: 2501: 2495: 2489: 2483: 2477: 2472: 2466: 2461: 2455: 2450: 2444: 2439: 2332: 2330: 2323: 2262: 2260: 2253: 1984: 1747:Dictionary.com, 1701: 1514: 1510:Feminism sidebar 1508: 1325:Mixed government 1164:Direct democracy 1114:Authoritarianism 1086: 1064: 1018:Mixed government 931:Direct democracy 899:Authoritarianism 332:Direct democracy 200: 199: 196: 193: 190: 169: 164: 163: 153: 146: 145: 140: 132: 125: 102: 101: 100: 93: 16: 5925: 5924: 5920: 5919: 5918: 5916: 5915: 5914: 5890: 5889: 5866: 5848: 5842: 5839: 5802: 5796: 5793: 5774: 5739: 5719: 5713: 5710: 5675: 5669: 5666: 5612: 5603: 5573:Politics portal 5565: 5560: 5559: 5546:Democratisation 5539:Autocratization 5515: 5507: 5506: 5402:Tributary state 5392:Satellite state 5317: 5316:Power structure 5309: 5308: 5260: 5259: 5212: 5189:Totalitarianism 5139: 5138: 5071: 5070: 5051: 5043: 5042: 5013: 4970: 4893: 4832: 4823: 4822:Source of power 4800:Basic forms of 4794:Politics series 4749: 4743: 4740: 4719: 4687: 4681: 4678: 4655: 4649: 4646: 4634: 4589: 4534:about what a " 4532:Knowledge (XXG) 4491:For one thing, 4489: 4451: 4445: 4427: 4423: 4419: 4417: 4416: 4385: 4381: 4377: 4375: 4374: 4358: 4352: 4333: 4327: 4320: 4314: 4307: 4298: 4292: 4282: 4278: 4274: 4272: 4271: 4266: 4223: 4196: 4168: 4166: 4140: 4132: 4124: 4115: 4069: 4049: 4019: 4011: 3998: 3990: 3980:total authority 3976: 3937: 3876: 3849:I have removed 3793: 3756: 3749: 3736: 3701: 3677: 3671: 3665: 3659: 3601: 3591: 3485: 3446: 3373: 3327: 3217: 3211: 3207: 3201: 3195:and <br: --> 3192: 3186: 3159: 3129:Politics portal 3121: 3105:Politics series 3092: 3062:Politics portal 3054: 3038:Politics series 3023: 2993:Politics portal 2985: 2969:Politics series 2962: 2806:Power Structure 2794: 2733:Totalitarianism 2652: 2633: 2616: 2613: 2610: 2607: 2599: 2541: 2532: 2522: 2517: 2516: 2508: 2504: 2496: 2492: 2484: 2480: 2473: 2469: 2462: 2458: 2451: 2447: 2440: 2436: 2431: 2399: 2326: 2324: 2256: 2254: 2245: 1985: 1982:Baron von Grimm 1980: 1942:131.104.138.210 1898:131.104.138.210 1877:administration. 1818:131.104.138.210 1801:131.104.138.210 1778:131.104.138.210 1684: 1681: 1642: 1512: 1506: 1420:Totalitarianism 1130:Communist state 1065: 1050:Totalitarianism 909:Communist state 768:communist state 320:Communist state 256: 237: 197: 194: 191: 188: 187: 167:Politics portal 165: 158: 138: 87: 86: 56: 12: 11: 5: 5923: 5921: 5913: 5912: 5907: 5902: 5892: 5891: 5865: 5862: 5861: 5860: 5859: 5858: 5773: 5770: 5769: 5768: 5738: 5735: 5734: 5733: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5658: 5611: 5610:Foreign powers 5608: 5605: 5604: 5602: 5601: 5594: 5587: 5579: 5576: 5575: 5562: 5561: 5556: 5555: 5554: 5553: 5551:Hybrid regimes 5548: 5543: 5542: 5541: 5531: 5526: 5516: 5513: 5512: 5509: 5508: 5505: 5502: 5501: 5500: 5499: 5494: 5489: 5484: 5482:Regional power 5479: 5471: 5470: 5464: 5463: 5462: 5461: 5460: 5455: 5450: 5445: 5440: 5432: 5431: 5425: 5424: 5423: 5422: 5421: 5416: 5411: 5404: 5399: 5394: 5389: 5387:Puppet monarch 5384: 5379: 5374: 5369: 5364: 5356: 5355: 5349: 5348: 5347: 5346: 5345: 5340: 5335: 5327: 5326: 5318: 5315: 5314: 5311: 5310: 5305: 5304: 5303: 5302: 5297: 5292: 5287: 5282: 5277: 5272: 5264: 5263: 5258: 5257: 5252: 5246: 5243: 5242: 5241: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5232: 5222: 5220:State religion 5214: 5213: 5211: 5210: 5207: 5203: 5200: 5199: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5191: 5186: 5181: 5176: 5171: 5166: 5161: 5156: 5151: 5143: 5142: 5137: 5136: 5131: 5125: 5122: 5121: 5120: 5119: 5118: 5113: 5108: 5103: 5098: 5093: 5091:Constitutional 5088: 5083: 5075: 5074: 5069: 5068: 5063: 5057: 5052: 5050:Power ideology 5049: 5048: 5045: 5044: 5039: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5030: 5025: 5017: 5016: 5014:(rule by none) 5007: 5006: 5005: 5004: 5003: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4986: 4978: 4977: 4964: 4963: 4962: 4961: 4960: 4955: 4950: 4945: 4940: 4935: 4930: 4925: 4920: 4915: 4910: 4905: 4897: 4896: 4887: 4886: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4878: 4873: 4868: 4866:Representative 4863: 4858: 4853: 4848: 4840: 4839: 4824: 4821: 4820: 4817: 4816: 4805: 4804: 4797: 4796: 4787: 4786: 4785: 4784: 4782: 4760: 4759: 4718: 4717:Collapsibility 4715: 4714: 4713: 4633: 4630: 4629: 4628: 4588: 4585: 4570: 4569: 4566: 4488: 4485: 4435: 4434: 4415: 4408: 4373: 4366: 4306: 4303: 4289: 4288: 4273:a change": --> 4270: 4267: 4265: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4222: 4219: 4200:Corporatocracy 4195: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4176: 4123: 4120: 4114: 4111: 4096:matrilineality 4092:patrilineality 4085:matrilineality 4068: 4065: 4048: 4045: 4044: 4043: 3975: 3972: 3959:, etc, etc..? 3949:national unity 3936: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3875: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3792: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3755: 3750: 3748: 3747: 3733:requested move 3727: 3726: 3713:213.246.94.204 3708: 3707: 3700: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3692: 3691: 3666:*'''Support''' 3658: 3655: 3644:213.246.91.158 3634: 3632: 3613: 3612: 3598:requested move 3592: 3590: 3589:Requested move 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3571:213.246.91.158 3535:213.246.91.158 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3507:Corporatocracy 3504: 3499: 3484: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3469:213.246.91.158 3445: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3420:213.246.91.158 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3372: 3371: 3368: 3365: 3362: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3334:213.246.91.158 3324: 3314:213.246.91.158 3311: 3304: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3253:213.246.91.158 3241: 3240: 3172:213.246.91.158 3165: 3164: 3161: 3160: 3158: 3157: 3150: 3143: 3135: 3132: 3131: 3118: 3117: 3114: 3108: 3107: 3097: 3094: 3093: 3091: 3090: 3083: 3076: 3068: 3065: 3064: 3051: 3050: 3047: 3041: 3040: 3025: 3024: 3022: 3021: 3014: 3007: 2999: 2996: 2995: 2982: 2981: 2978: 2972: 2971: 2961: 2958: 2927: 2926: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2916: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886:Ecclesiastical 2884: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2872:Representative 2869: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856:Constitutional 2854: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2830: 2829: 2824: 2819: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2797: 2793: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2661:Garrison state 2651: 2648: 2632: 2629: 2598: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2540: 2537: 2528: 2521: 2518: 2515: 2514: 2502: 2490: 2478: 2467: 2456: 2445: 2433: 2432: 2430: 2427: 2398: 2395: 2338: 2337: 2301: 2300: 2284: 2283: 2244: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2185: 2184: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2123: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2033:Best regard -- 2031: 2030: 2026: 2025: 2020: 2019: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2005: 1991: 1978: 1976:"bureaucracy." 1972: 1971: 1960: 1957: 1953: 1952: 1938: 1933: 1932: 1924: 1923: 1918: 1917: 1909: 1908: 1894:administratore 1888: 1887: 1884:administratore 1879: 1878: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1835:consensus per 1829: 1828: 1812: 1811: 1795: 1794: 1789: 1788: 1772: 1733:a government: 1721: 1720: 1680: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1663:Done. Thanks. 1641: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1466:User:Aronlee90 1463: 1456: 1455: 1441: 1440: 1434: 1433: 1425: 1417: 1409: 1401: 1393: 1385: 1377: 1369: 1360: 1359: 1351: 1343: 1335: 1327: 1321: 1320: 1312: 1304: 1296: 1288: 1280: 1272: 1263: 1262: 1254: 1245: 1244: 1236: 1231: 1223: 1215: 1206: 1205: 1196: 1195: 1187: 1178: 1177: 1169: 1160: 1159: 1151: 1143: 1138:Corporatocracy 1135: 1127: 1119: 1111: 1103: 1094: 1093: 1089: 1088: 1058: 1057: 1052: 1047: 1042: 1037: 1031: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1014: 1013: 1008: 1003: 997: 996: 991: 985: 984: 979: 974: 969: 964: 958: 957: 951: 950: 945: 939: 938: 933: 927: 926: 921: 916: 914:Corporatocracy 911: 906: 901: 896: 891: 885: 884: 880: 879: 863: 862: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 634: 633: 632: 631: 602: 601: 600: 599: 583: 582: 581: 580: 573: 572: 571: 570: 560: 559: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 440: 439: 438: 437: 420: 419: 390: 389: 383: 382: 377: 371: 370: 364: 363: 358: 352: 351: 346: 340: 339: 334: 328: 327: 322: 317: 312: 255: 252: 236: 233: 230: 229: 226: 225: 222: 221: 214:Mid-importance 210: 204: 203: 201: 184:the discussion 171: 170: 154: 142: 141: 139:Mid‑importance 133: 121: 120: 114: 103: 89: 88: 85: 84: 77: 72: 63: 57: 55: 54: 43: 34: 33: 30: 29: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5922: 5911: 5908: 5906: 5903: 5901: 5898: 5897: 5895: 5888: 5887: 5883: 5879: 5875: 5871: 5864:Included list 5863: 5857: 5853: 5851: 5845: 5836: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5826: 5822: 5818: 5814: 5813: 5812: 5811: 5807: 5805: 5799: 5791: 5787: 5783: 5779: 5771: 5767: 5763: 5759: 5755: 5754: 5753: 5752: 5748: 5744: 5736: 5728: 5724: 5722: 5716: 5708: 5704: 5703: 5702: 5698: 5694: 5690: 5686: 5685: 5684: 5680: 5678: 5672: 5664: 5659: 5656: 5652: 5651: 5650: 5649: 5645: 5641: 5637: 5633: 5629: 5625: 5621: 5617: 5609: 5600: 5595: 5593: 5588: 5586: 5581: 5580: 5578: 5577: 5574: 5569: 5564: 5563: 5552: 5549: 5547: 5544: 5540: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5532: 5530: 5527: 5525: 5522: 5521: 5520: 5519: 5511: 5510: 5498: 5495: 5493: 5490: 5488: 5485: 5483: 5480: 5478: 5475: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5469: 5465: 5459: 5456: 5454: 5451: 5449: 5446: 5444: 5441: 5439: 5438:Confederation 5436: 5435: 5434: 5433: 5430: 5426: 5420: 5417: 5415: 5412: 5410: 5409: 5405: 5403: 5400: 5398: 5395: 5393: 5390: 5388: 5385: 5383: 5380: 5378: 5375: 5373: 5370: 5368: 5365: 5363: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5357: 5354: 5350: 5344: 5341: 5339: 5336: 5334: 5333:Unitary state 5331: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5325: 5321: 5313: 5312: 5301: 5298: 5296: 5293: 5291: 5288: 5286: 5283: 5281: 5278: 5276: 5273: 5271: 5268: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5256: 5253: 5251: 5248: 5247: 5244: 5236: 5235:State atheism 5233: 5231: 5228: 5227: 5226: 5225:Secular state 5223: 5221: 5218: 5217: 5216: 5215: 5208: 5205: 5204: 5201: 5195: 5192: 5190: 5187: 5185: 5182: 5180: 5177: 5175: 5172: 5170: 5167: 5165: 5162: 5160: 5157: 5155: 5152: 5150: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5135: 5132: 5130: 5129:Authoritarian 5127: 5126: 5123: 5117: 5114: 5112: 5109: 5107: 5106:Parliamentary 5104: 5102: 5099: 5097: 5094: 5092: 5089: 5087: 5084: 5082: 5079: 5078: 5077: 5076: 5067: 5064: 5062: 5059: 5058: 5055: 5047: 5046: 5034: 5031: 5029: 5026: 5024: 5021: 5020: 5019: 5018: 5012: 5008: 5002: 4999: 4995: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4987: 4985: 4982: 4981: 4980: 4979: 4974: 4969: 4965: 4959: 4956: 4954: 4951: 4949: 4946: 4944: 4941: 4939: 4936: 4934: 4931: 4929: 4926: 4924: 4921: 4919: 4916: 4914: 4911: 4909: 4906: 4904: 4901: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4894:(rule by few) 4892: 4888: 4882: 4879: 4877: 4874: 4872: 4869: 4867: 4864: 4862: 4859: 4857: 4854: 4852: 4849: 4847: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4836: 4831: 4827: 4819: 4818: 4815: 4812: 4811: 4807: 4806: 4803: 4798: 4795: 4791: 4790: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4769: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4758: 4754: 4752: 4746: 4738: 4735: 4734: 4733: 4732: 4728: 4724: 4716: 4712: 4708: 4704: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4692: 4690: 4684: 4676: 4675:highest level 4672: 4667: 4664: 4660: 4658: 4652: 4644: 4643:User:Carewolf 4640: 4631: 4627: 4623: 4619: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4603:Mike Schwartz 4600: 4595: 4592: 4586: 4584: 4583: 4579: 4575: 4567: 4564: 4561:but it is on 4560: 4556: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4548: 4543: 4541: 4537: 4533: 4529: 4525: 4520: 4518: 4514: 4510: 4506: 4502: 4498: 4494: 4486: 4484: 4481: 4479: 4475: 4471: 4466: 4464: 4460: 4455: 4450: 4443: 4439: 4432: 4431: 4430: 4422: 4413: 4409: 4407: 4405: 4401: 4397: 4393: 4388: 4380: 4371: 4367: 4365: 4362: 4357: 4350: 4345: 4343: 4339: 4332: 4324: 4323:" template. 4319: 4312: 4304: 4302: 4297: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4277: 4268: 4263: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4236: 4232: 4228: 4220: 4218: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4205: 4201: 4193: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4177: 4175: 4171: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4156: 4152: 4151: 4144: 4136: 4129: 4121: 4119: 4112: 4110: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4093: 4088: 4086: 4082: 4078: 4074: 4073:manosphereans 4066: 4064: 4063: 4059: 4055: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4023: 4016: 4014: 4006: 4005: 4002: 3995: 3993: 3986: 3981: 3973: 3971: 3970: 3966: 3962: 3961:Sardanaphalus 3958: 3957:supranational 3954: 3950: 3946: 3942: 3934: 3930: 3926: 3922: 3921:Sardanaphalus 3918: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3907: 3903: 3898: 3895: 3893: 3889: 3885: 3880: 3873: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3852: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3797: 3790: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3761:71.160.93.144 3758: 3757: 3754: 3746: 3744: 3739: 3734: 3729: 3728: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3714: 3710: 3709: 3706: 3703: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3693: 3690: 3688: 3684: 3676: 3672:*'''Oppose''' 3670: 3664: 3661: 3660: 3656: 3654: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3631: 3630: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3611: 3609: 3604: 3599: 3594: 3593: 3588: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3551:, not I. See 3550: 3547:Was added by 3546: 3545: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3520: 3516: 3508: 3505: 3503: 3500: 3498: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3448:I have added 3443: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3369: 3366: 3363: 3360: 3359: 3346: 3345: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3325: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3312: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3216: 3206: 3199: 3191: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3156: 3151: 3149: 3144: 3142: 3137: 3136: 3134: 3133: 3130: 3125: 3120: 3119: 3116: 3109: 3106: 3102: 3101: 3089: 3084: 3082: 3077: 3075: 3070: 3069: 3067: 3066: 3063: 3058: 3053: 3052: 3049: 3042: 3039: 3035: 3034: 3030: 3020: 3015: 3013: 3008: 3006: 3001: 3000: 2998: 2997: 2994: 2989: 2984: 2983: 2980: 2973: 2970: 2966: 2965: 2960:Proposed edit 2959: 2957: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2942: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2925:Authoritarian 2924: 2920: 2917: 2915: 2914:Parliamentary 2912: 2911: 2910: 2907: 2906: 2899: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2885: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2877: 2873: 2870: 2868: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2860: 2855: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2847: 2846: 2839: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2828: 2825: 2823: 2820: 2818: 2815: 2814: 2807: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2754: 2753:Welfare state 2750: 2746: 2742: 2739:is a type of 2738: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2649: 2647: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2630: 2628: 2627: 2623: 2622:talk with me! 2619: 2604: 2597:Theodemocracy 2596: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2566:Nick Levinson 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2538: 2536: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2519: 2512: 2506: 2503: 2500: 2494: 2491: 2488: 2482: 2479: 2476: 2471: 2468: 2465: 2460: 2457: 2454: 2449: 2446: 2443: 2438: 2435: 2428: 2426: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2396: 2394: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2371: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2356: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2336: 2331: 2329: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2286: 2285: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2261: 2259: 2250: 2243:Third opinion 2242: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2194: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2166:third opinion 2162: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2081: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2028: 2027: 2022: 2021: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2008: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1987: 1983: 1977: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1958: 1955: 1954: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1925: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1910: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1890: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1880: 1875: 1874: 1870: 1869: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1847: 1843: 1838: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1814: 1813: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1797: 1796: 1791: 1790: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1752: 1750: 1745: 1741: 1739: 1734: 1732: 1727: 1719: 1716: 1714: 1708: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1665:Nick Levinson 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1650:Nick Levinson 1647: 1640: 1637: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1618:Nick Levinson 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1557:Nick Levinson 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1516: 1511: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1467: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1435: 1432: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1421: 1418: 1416: 1413: 1410: 1408: 1405: 1404:Theodemocracy 1402: 1400: 1397: 1394: 1392: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1378: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1368: 1365: 1362: 1361: 1358: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1347: 1344: 1342: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1331: 1328: 1326: 1323: 1322: 1319: 1316: 1313: 1311: 1308: 1305: 1303: 1300: 1297: 1295: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1281: 1279: 1276: 1273: 1271: 1268: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1258: 1255: 1253: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1243: 1240: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1230: 1227: 1224: 1222: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1204: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1158: 1155: 1152: 1150: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1112: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1048: 1046: 1043: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1032: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1012: 1009: 1007: 1004: 1002: 999: 998: 995: 992: 990: 987: 986: 983: 980: 978: 975: 973: 970: 968: 965: 963: 960: 959: 956: 953: 952: 949: 946: 944: 941: 940: 937: 934: 932: 929: 928: 925: 922: 920: 917: 915: 912: 910: 907: 905: 902: 900: 897: 895: 892: 890: 887: 886: 882: 881: 878: 874: 870: 865: 864: 860: 859: 848: 844: 840: 836: 833: 830: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 807: 803: 799: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 752: 747: 743: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 721: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 699: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 679: 675: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 657: 653: 649: 645: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 630: 626: 622: 618: 614: 610: 606: 605: 604: 603: 596: 591: 587: 586: 585: 584: 577: 576: 575: 574: 568: 564: 563: 562: 561: 558: 554: 550: 545: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 512: 511: 507: 503: 499: 498: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 459: 455: 451: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 436: 432: 428: 424: 423: 422: 421: 418: 414: 410: 406: 405: 404: 403: 399: 395: 388: 385: 384: 381: 378: 376: 373: 372: 369: 366: 365: 362: 359: 357: 354: 353: 350: 347: 345: 342: 341: 338: 335: 333: 330: 329: 326: 323: 321: 318: 316: 313: 311: 308: 307: 306: 305: 301: 298: 297: 293: 287: 285: 281: 277: 273: 269: 264: 262: 253: 251: 250: 246: 242: 234: 219: 215: 209: 206: 205: 202: 185: 181: 177: 176: 168: 162: 157: 155: 152: 148: 147: 143: 137: 134: 131: 127: 122: 118: 112: 108: 104: 95: 94: 82: 78: 76: 73: 71: 67: 64: 62: 59: 58: 52: 48: 47:Learn to edit 44: 41: 36: 35: 32: 31: 26: 22: 18: 17: 5867: 5840: 5794: 5789: 5785: 5781: 5775: 5740: 5711: 5667: 5662: 5616:Protectorate 5614:I would add 5613: 5589: 5487:Middle power 5414:Vassal state 5408:Buffer state 5406: 5382:Puppet state 5377:Protectorate 5353:Client state 5343:Principality 5169:Distributism 5111:Presidential 4989:Dictatorship 4913:Gerontocracy 4835:rule by many 4808: 4792:Part of the 4767: 4741: 4720: 4679: 4674: 4668: 4647: 4635: 4596: 4593: 4590: 4581: 4571: 4562: 4554: 4544: 4539: 4527: 4521: 4512: 4511:even though 4508: 4504: 4492: 4490: 4482: 4477: 4469: 4467: 4462: 4456: 4437: 4436: 4428: 4389: 4386: 4363: 4346: 4325: 4308: 4290: 4283: 4224: 4197: 4127: 4125: 4116: 4089: 4070: 4050: 4012: 4007: 3991: 3984: 3979: 3977: 3938: 3899: 3896: 3881: 3877: 3794: 3737: 3730: 3715: 3704: 3680: 3674: 3668: 3662: 3633: 3616: 3614: 3602: 3595: 3530: 3513: 3486: 3447: 3328:— Preceding 3248: 3168: 3103:Part of the 3036:Part of the 2967:Part of the 2943: 2928: 2919:Presidential 2898:Legal System 2897: 2849:Aristocratic 2838:Power Source 2837: 2805: 2795: 2729:Police state 2701:Pantisocracy 2669:Kakistocracy 2653: 2650:Observations 2634: 2600: 2542: 2523: 2505: 2493: 2481: 2470: 2459: 2448: 2437: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2372: 2357: 2339: 2327: 2302: 2257: 2246: 2192: 2160: 2142: 2112: 2097: 2082: 2079: 2056: 2052: 2032: 2024:bureaucrats. 2012: 1974: 1963: 1929:bureaucratie 1928: 1893: 1883: 1845: 1837:WP:CONSENSUS 1771: 1753: 1746: 1742: 1735: 1730: 1725: 1722: 1712: 1706: 1691:82.231.12.81 1682: 1643: 1445:Bayle Shanks 1430: 1422: 1414: 1406: 1398: 1390: 1382: 1374: 1366: 1356: 1348: 1340: 1332: 1317: 1309: 1301: 1293: 1285: 1277: 1269: 1259: 1251: 1241: 1228: 1220: 1212: 1202: 1192: 1190:Dictatorship 1184: 1174: 1166: 1156: 1148: 1140: 1132: 1124: 1116: 1108: 1100: 1072:Bayle Shanks 948:Dictatorship 869:Bayle Shanks 834: 828: 771: 759: 755: 749: 745: 741: 697: 673: 643: 616: 612: 588:The article 479: 475: 391: 344:Dictatorship 302: 299: 288: 279: 275: 271: 267: 265: 257: 238: 213: 173: 117:WikiProjects 106: 19:This is the 5743:DMT biscuit 5663:encompasses 5628:Trusteeship 5492:Great power 5477:Small power 5419:Viceroyalty 5290:Nationalism 5154:Colonialism 5134:Libertarian 5096:Directorial 4973:rule by one 4953:Technocracy 4948:Stratocracy 4928:Meritocracy 4918:Kleptocracy 4908:Aristocracy 4737:DMT biscuit 4723:DMT biscuit 4515:entry for " 4513:there is no 4440:entry for " 4438:there is no 3743:move review 3608:move review 3502:Bureaucracy 2725:Squirearchy 2705:Plantocracy 2693:Aristocracy 2665:Green state 2657:Corporatism 2581:Robthepiper 2550:Robthepiper 2546:Nanny state 1916:definition/ 1685:—Preceding 1679:Bureaucracy 1523:incomplete. 1388:Technocracy 1380:Stratocracy 1226:Meritocracy 1106:Aristocracy 1066:—Preceding 972:Meritocracy 894:Aristocracy 613:in practice 476:in practice 310:Aristocracy 276:in practice 235:Collapse it 5894:Categories 5835:Geysirhead 5821:Geysirhead 5790:components 5778:Geysirhead 5707:Geysirhead 5693:Geysirhead 5655:Geysirhead 5640:Geysirhead 5632:Geysirhead 5497:Superpower 5453:Superstate 5448:Federation 5443:Devolution 5429:Federalism 5270:City-state 4943:Plutocracy 4938:Particracy 4802:government 4641:, pinging 4349:Devolution 4342:Devolution 4305:Background 4227:pathocracy 4221:Pathocracy 4054:FourLights 3890:and maybe 3837:Dougweller 3823:Dougweller 3699:Discussion 3497:Bankocracy 3492:Pejorative 3483:Pejorative 3115:government 3048:government 2979:government 2947:Rustyfence 2932:Rustyfence 2909:Republican 2879:Theocratic 2862:Democratic 2827:Confederal 2749:Synarchism 2745:Superpower 2717:Sociocracy 2709:Plutocracy 2697:Panarchism 2681:Mediocracy 2673:Kratocracy 2416:Rustyfence 2328:Sandstein 2258:Sandstein 1990:monarchy." 1922:democracy. 1646:matriarchy 1639:Matriarchy 1372:Sociocracy 1307:Plutocracy 1283:Ochlocracy 1234:Minarchism 1218:Kritocracy 1006:Plutocracy 977:Minarchism 967:Kritocracy 764:Minarchism 284:Minarchism 241:FourLights 5843:PJvanMill 5817:PJvanMill 5797:PJvanMill 5714:PJvanMill 5670:PJvanMill 5324:Unitarism 5300:Globalism 5206:Religious 5194:Tribalism 5184:Socialism 5179:Feudalism 5164:Despotism 5159:Communism 5149:Anarchism 5086:Communist 5033:Stateless 5023:Anarchism 4984:Despotism 4968:Autocracy 4958:Theocracy 4923:Kritarchy 4891:Oligarchy 4876:Socialist 4830:Democracy 4744:PJvanMill 4682:PJvanMill 4671:this edit 4650:PJvanMill 4618:PJvanMill 4501:hyperlink 4402:" and a " 4250:PJvanMill 4208:PJvanMill 4204:Netocracy 4180:PJvanMill 4100:Lappspira 4077:femminism 4033:StanMan87 3935:By scope? 3892:Theocracy 3851:Caliphate 3800:theocracy 3796:Caliphate 3450:Polyarchy 3444:Polyarchy 3361:Democracy 3215:plainlist 2883:Canonical 2774:Aristotle 2737:Sultanism 2721:Democracy 2713:Oligarchy 2685:Nomocracy 2677:Kyriarchy 2617:AUserName 2530:☭contribs 2526:43?9enter 2221:Prototime 2170:Prototime 2126:also :)-- 2061:Prototime 1851:Prototime 1756:Prototime 1600:solution. 1582:template. 1412:Timocracy 1396:Theocracy 1364:Socialism 1299:Omniarchy 1291:Oligarchy 1210:Feudalism 1182:Despotism 1154:Democracy 1122:Autocracy 1098:Anarchism 1045:Timocracy 1040:Theocracy 1035:Socialism 1001:Oligarchy 962:Feudalism 943:Despotism 924:Democracy 904:Autocracy 889:Anarchism 837:Regards, 776:communism 756:anarchism 742:qualities 325:Democracy 315:Autocracy 292:Robocracy 272:qualities 261:Kritarchy 83:if needed 66:Be polite 27:template. 21:talk page 5624:Dominion 5372:Dominion 5101:Legalist 5081:Absolute 5066:Republic 5061:Monarchy 4933:Noocracy 4903:Anocracy 4856:Economic 4846:Demarchy 4703:Carewolf 4582:(right?) 4574:monarchy 4563:page 133 4047:Legalism 3917:republic 3902:Carewolf 3888:Monarchy 3884:Republic 3681:. Since 3386:Frietjes 3330:unsigned 3278:Frietjes 3247:Sidebar 3230:Frietjes 3205:flatlist 3113:forms of 3046:forms of 2977:forms of 2758:Adam4267 2741:Monarchy 2689:Noocracy 2603:Demarchy 2229:contribs 2196:junta.-- 2178:contribs 2069:contribs 1859:contribs 1764:contribs 1687:unsigned 1438:Chiefdom 1315:Republic 1275:Noocracy 1239:Monarchy 1146:Demarchy 1080:contribs 1068:unsigned 1062:Chiefdom 1011:Republic 982:Monarchy 919:Demarchy 368:Republic 349:Monarchy 189:Politics 180:politics 136:Politics 107:template 51:get help 5878:CanonNi 5758:Wiz9999 5514:Related 5209:Secular 5174:Fascism 5011:Anarchy 5001:Tyranny 4861:Liberal 4772:Wiz9999 4578:kingdom 4547:obvious 4540:look-up 4536:kingdom 4524:obvious 4517:kingdom 4474:kingdom 4463:*title* 4459:kingdom 4442:kingdom 4414:", too! 4412:kingdom 4404:kingdom 4296:infobox 3953:federal 3856:Jim1138 3808:Jim1138 3557:Jim1138 3555:Cheers 3515:Jim1138 3454:Moosh88 2853:Popular 2822:Federal 2817:Unitary 1711:Adrian 1543:number. 839:Doright 832:anarchy 772:quality 760:quality 751:anarchy 648:Aelffin 549:Aelffin 502:Doright 450:Doright 409:Doright 216:on the 5872:under 5338:Empire 5250:Global 4881:Others 4871:Social 4851:Direct 4770:". - 4497:empire 4470:got to 4400:empire 4396:Empire 4392:Empire 4376:": --> 4370:Empire 4244:Hello 4128:before 4013:Dustin 3992:Dustin 3657:Survey 3549:Burham 3370:Form 3 3367:Form 2 3364:Form 1 3111:Basic 3044:Basic 2975:Basic 2867:Direct 2384:Burham 2376:Burham 2361:Burham 2346:Burham 2305:Burham 2290:Burham 2273:Burham 2198:Burham 2193:within 2161:within 2145:Burham 2128:Burham 2035:Burham 1995:Burham 1964:kratos 1731:within 1715:Hunter 798:Lmbstl 744:, not 621:Lmbstl 524:Lmbstl 488:Lmbstl 427:Lmbstl 394:Lmbstl 113:scale. 5255:Local 4597:PS: " 4509:that, 4478:first 4246:Daask 4231:Daask 4052:work. 3941:local 3775:CsDix 3621:CsDix 3617:Moved 3531:basic 3249:et al 2249:WP:3O 2114:: --> 2113:: --> 2099:: --> 2098:: --> 2084:: --> 2083:: --> 2018:etc." 1846:using 1707:cracy 1428:Tribe 1055:Tribe 758:is a 746:forms 105:This 79:Seek 5882:talk 5849:talk 5825:talk 5803:talk 5762:talk 5747:talk 5720:talk 5697:talk 5676:talk 5644:talk 5636:talk 4776:talk 4768:text 4750:talk 4727:talk 4707:talk 4688:talk 4656:talk 4622:talk 4607:talk 4528:must 4505:then 4420:edit 4406:". 4378:edit 4361:". 4344:". 4275:edit 4254:talk 4235:talk 4212:talk 4184:talk 4169:czar 4155:talk 4150:Ogat 4139:and 4135:Czar 4104:talk 4083:and 4075:and 4058:talk 4037:talk 4020:talk 3999:talk 3965:talk 3925:talk 3906:talk 3860:talk 3841:talk 3827:talk 3812:talk 3779:talk 3765:talk 3720:talk 3678:~~~~ 3648:talk 3625:talk 3575:talk 3561:talk 3539:talk 3519:talk 3473:talk 3458:talk 3424:talk 3390:talk 3338:talk 3318:talk 3282:talk 3257:talk 3234:talk 3176:talk 2951:talk 2936:talk 2782:talk 2778:R-41 2762:talk 2641:talk 2637:R-41 2614:With 2611:Dude 2608:Some 2585:talk 2570:talk 2554:talk 2420:talk 2388:talk 2380:talk 2365:talk 2350:talk 2320:WP:V 2309:talk 2294:talk 2277:talk 2225:talk 2202:talk 2174:talk 2149:talk 2132:talk 2065:talk 2039:talk 1999:talk 1946:talk 1902:talk 1855:talk 1822:talk 1805:talk 1782:talk 1760:talk 1695:talk 1669:talk 1654:talk 1622:talk 1561:talk 1449:talk 1076:talk 873:talk 843:talk 802:talk 652:talk 625:talk 553:talk 528:talk 518:and 506:talk 492:talk 454:talk 431:talk 413:talk 398:talk 268:form 245:talk 68:and 5786:not 5782:not 4580:". 3985:one 3735:. 3274:--> 3224:or 3220:or 3210:or 1896:.-- 774:of 762:. 208:Mid 5896:: 5884:) 5876:. 5827:) 5764:) 5749:) 5699:) 5646:) 5626:, 5622:, 5618:, 4778:) 4729:) 4709:) 4645:. 4624:) 4609:) 4493:if 4452:}} 4446:{{ 4359:}} 4353:{{ 4334:}} 4328:{{ 4321:}} 4315:{{ 4299:}} 4293:{{ 4256:) 4237:) 4214:) 4186:) 4157:) 4147:. 4106:) 4060:) 4039:) 3967:) 3955:, 3951:, 3947:, 3943:, 3927:) 3908:) 3894:. 3886:, 3862:) 3843:) 3829:) 3814:) 3806:. 3781:) 3767:) 3722:) 3669:or 3650:) 3638:→ 3627:) 3619:. 3600:. 3577:) 3563:) 3541:) 3521:) 3475:) 3460:) 3426:) 3392:) 3340:) 3320:) 3284:) 3259:) 3236:) 3228:. 3218:}} 3212:{{ 3208:}} 3202:{{ 3193:}} 3187:{{ 3178:) 2953:) 2938:) 2784:) 2764:) 2743:. 2735:. 2723:. 2715:. 2643:) 2624:) 2587:) 2572:) 2556:) 2422:) 2390:) 2367:) 2352:) 2311:) 2296:) 2279:) 2231:) 2227:· 2204:) 2180:) 2176:· 2151:) 2134:) 2071:) 2067:· 2053:is 2041:) 2001:) 1993:-- 1979:— 1948:) 1904:) 1861:) 1857:· 1824:) 1807:) 1784:) 1766:) 1762:· 1713:J. 1697:) 1671:) 1656:) 1624:) 1563:) 1513:}} 1507:{{ 1451:) 1082:) 1078:• 875:) 845:) 804:) 654:) 627:) 555:) 530:) 508:) 494:) 456:) 433:) 415:) 400:) 247:) 49:; 5880:( 5852:( 5846:) 5833:@ 5823:( 5815:@ 5806:( 5800:) 5776:@ 5760:( 5745:( 5723:( 5717:) 5705:@ 5695:( 5679:( 5673:) 5653:@ 5642:( 5634:( 5598:e 5591:t 5584:v 4975:) 4971:( 4837:) 4833:( 4774:( 4753:( 4747:) 4725:( 4705:( 4691:( 4685:) 4665:) 4659:( 4653:) 4620:( 4605:( 4424:] 4382:] 4279:] 4252:( 4233:( 4210:( 4182:( 4153:( 4145:: 4141:@ 4137:: 4133:@ 4102:( 4056:( 4035:( 4022:) 4018:( 4001:) 3997:( 3963:( 3923:( 3904:( 3858:( 3839:( 3825:( 3810:( 3777:( 3763:( 3718:( 3689:. 3646:( 3623:( 3573:( 3559:( 3537:( 3517:( 3471:( 3456:( 3422:( 3388:( 3336:( 3316:( 3280:( 3255:( 3232:( 3190:· 3174:( 3154:e 3147:t 3140:v 3087:e 3080:t 3073:v 3018:e 3011:t 3004:v 2949:( 2934:( 2780:( 2760:( 2639:( 2620:( 2583:( 2568:( 2552:( 2418:( 2386:( 2378:( 2363:( 2348:( 2307:( 2292:( 2275:( 2223:( 2200:( 2172:( 2147:( 2130:( 2063:( 2037:( 1997:( 1944:( 1900:( 1853:( 1820:( 1803:( 1780:( 1758:( 1693:( 1667:( 1652:( 1620:( 1559:( 1447:( 1074:( 871:( 841:( 800:( 650:( 623:( 551:( 526:( 504:( 490:( 452:( 429:( 411:( 396:( 243:( 220:. 119:: 53:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index