106:
Yes, it is better idea. However, there is a lot of job to do for such design: To complete the list (AFAIK, even it is not complete, it seems that this is the most complete list of cases on the
Internet and a lot of research is needed to complete the list and to remove all nonsenses); to categorize
390:
Well, the “basic” cases are the ones that reflect morphosyntactic alignment. If anything, “Morphosyntactic” would be a better term, though it's a bit long and thus may widen the table. Calling the whole group “Nominative” would be identifying the whole group by a single member of it. –
430:
One morething: When there are no inclusion of the old case table, you should copy the content of the new case table into this template. And after that, we should rename inclusion. Also, you should make a redirect from the new case table template to the case table template.
321:
I don't know. I arranged them that way myself. They can always be rearranged later. My main concern at this point was getting the pages changed from a sidebar-based to bottom-of-the-page-based template. I've done that now: the pages that used {{]}} now use
55:
Is there a compelling argument for having the accusative and nominative cases tucked away at the bottom of the table under 'morphosyntactic alignment'? Would it not be simpler and more useful just to have the whole list alphabetical?
107:
cases (former categorization was bad; now there is no categorization) and, finally, to remove old and to put new template in all of the articles (more then 50, maybe close to 100 after the list is completed). --
127:
If someone has references for existence of formal case, please let him/her write them here. While googling for "formal case", i found only mentioning of formal case in the sense of
Hungarian
326:}}. I'll leave it to someone else to implement step 3 of Millosh's plan, above, or I'll do it myself later. Meanwhile, the new template is live, so feel free to change the groupings. –
450:}} redirects here. Now, we need to remove the word "new" from the cases. I think that we may do that without bots (there is not a lot of work for that). The referent page for work is
188:
and go ahead and update it, but the current template is a sidebar, and my version is a regular bottom-of-the-page one. Should I make a new template for it, or just update
177:-using version, which also has the cases arranged into groups (though somewhat arbitrarily, but this could always be changed / debated over later), which can be seen at
451:
253:
When we finish with that, we may copy the content from the new case table into case table and start with changing "new case table" into "case table". --
295:
While I prefer this layout, I'm a bit skeptical of the division into "Basic", "Adpositional" etc. classes. Do published sources follow this scheme? --
178:
79:
25:
33:
95:
396:
331:
278:
197:
447:
323:
270:
222:
66:
There is no logical reason for having nominative and accusative tucked away at the bottom of the table.
75:
This template has gotten quite long for a sidebar. Maybe it could be turned into a footer like, say,
416:
BTW, at the end, we may ask some of the bot owners to replace "new case table" with "case table". --
356:
Maybe "basic" should be renamed to "Nominative" or something similar. Hmm... Maybe as "Subject "? --
392:
327:
274:
193:
151:
239:
When you do that, ask here for help: we will be adding new case table and removing case table. --
128:
37:
17:
192:
one (and, either way, go through and update the pages that invoke it so they do so properly)? –
474:
459:
436:
421:
361:
258:
244:
230:
212:
159:
136:
112:
454:. I'll start from the end of the list, so if anyone is online, they may start from the top. --
57:
29:
21:
300:
269:
Alright, sounds like a plan. I'm willing to do most of the grunt work myself. I'll create {{
174:
478:
463:
440:
425:
400:
365:
335:
304:
282:
262:
248:
234:
216:
201:
185:
163:
140:
116:
100:
60:
446:
I completed the transition and now {{]}} has the content of the new case table and {{
91:
470:
455:
432:
417:
357:
254:
240:
226:
208:
155:
132:
108:
296:
44:
86:
181:(though that page itself isn't suitable for use as a template yet).
207:Your table looks great! I suggest the next: --
16:Do you guys think such combined case names as
452:Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:New case table
8:
154:is a verb category, not a noun category. --
40:, should be also included in this table?
273:}} and start updating pages, then. –
7:
14:
179:User:Vystrix Nexoth/Case table
1:
164:20:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
61:19:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
150:According to Google search,
26:Instrumental-comitative case
494:
34:Distributive-temporal case
117:14:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
47:01:59, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
479:11:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
464:11:15, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
441:10:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
426:10:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
401:04:58, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
366:10:43, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
336:19:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
305:19:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
283:18:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
263:06:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
249:06:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
235:06:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
217:06:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
202:15:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
141:08:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
101:04:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
36:, which are present in
469:Everything is done. --
173:I cooked up a proper
169:Proposed new version
80:University of London
129:Essive-formal case
18:Essive-formal case
99:
30:Causal-final case
22:Essive-modal case
485:
184:I'm inclined to
89:
84:
78:
493:
492:
488:
487:
486:
484:
483:
482:
175:Template:Navbox
171:
148:
125:
82:
76:
73:
53:
12:
11:
5:
491:
489:
467:
466:
448:new case table
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
393:Vystrix Nexoth
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
328:Vystrix Nexoth
324:new case table
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
288:
287:
286:
285:
275:Vystrix Nexoth
271:new case table
266:
265:
251:
237:
223:new case table
194:Vystrix Nexoth
191:
170:
167:
147:
144:
124:
121:
120:
119:
72:
69:
68:
67:
52:
51:Strange layout
49:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
490:
481:
480:
476:
472:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
444:
443:
442:
438:
434:
428:
427:
423:
419:
402:
398:
394:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
337:
333:
329:
325:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
250:
246:
242:
238:
236:
232:
228:
224:
221:Name it as {{
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
206:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
189:
187:
182:
180:
176:
168:
166:
165:
161:
157:
153:
145:
143:
142:
138:
134:
130:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
104:
103:
102:
97:
93:
88:
81:
70:
65:
64:
63:
62:
59:
50:
48:
46:
41:
39:
35:
31:
27:
23:
19:
475:talk (meta:)
468:
460:talk (meta:)
437:talk (meta:)
429:
422:talk (meta:)
415:
362:talk (meta:)
259:talk (meta:)
245:talk (meta:)
231:talk (meta:)
213:talk (meta:)
183:
172:
160:talk (meta:)
152:Jussive case
149:
146:Jussive case
137:talk (meta:)
126:
113:talk (meta:)
74:
54:
42:
15:
123:Formal case
87:Minh Nguyá»…n
38:Hungarian
96:contribs
471:millosh
456:millosh
433:millosh
418:millosh
358:millosh
255:millosh
241:millosh
227:millosh
209:millosh
186:be bold
156:millosh
133:millosh
109:millosh
58:Stevage
297:Ptcamn
225:}}. --
71:Layout
45:Adam78
397:talk
332:talk
301:talk
279:talk
198:talk
190:this
131:. --
92:talk
85:. –
32:and
477:)
462:)
439:)
431:--
424:)
399:)
364:)
334:)
322:{{
303:)
281:)
261:)
247:)
233:)
215:)
200:)
162:)
139:)
115:)
94:,
83:}}
77:{{
43:--
28:,
24:,
20:,
473:(
458:(
435:(
420:(
395:(
360:(
330:(
299:(
277:(
257:(
243:(
229:(
211:(
196:(
158:(
135:(
111:(
98:)
90:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.