22:
139:
77:
53:
87:
240:
I was just looking at the template and reading the
Portugues version of the Brasilian Empire article and I thought of a possible section to add to this template. I propose a section called origins, which would include articles like the Portugues Corte Transfer and Joao VI and the UK of P, B, and the
187:
First, he was never called "John I". Second, international treaties are not above a country's constitution, Third, the entire idea behind this template is to have key articles to understand the imperial era in Brazil. There are many, many key historical figures who were left out, such as regent
188:
Antônio Diogo Feijó, Conservative founder
Bernardo Pereira de Vasconcelos, Conservative leader Viscount of Itaboraí, Liberal founder and leader Cristiano Otoni, etc... King João VI was a key figure in the late Brazilian colonial history, not Imperial history. --
171:
Would he not be an emperor recognized by
Brazilian law, for the Treaty of Rio de Janeiro is a law-binding treaty ratified by both Brazil and Portugal, making Joao VI emperor Joao I. Now he was only titular, but it is nonetheless legal. Thank you,
310:
Yeah, whatever. I can see that you are new here. I'd like to point out that you shouldn't, I repeat, should NOT create articles which are no more than a single and short phrase and that no one will ever turn into a full article.
260:
There are many sections about nobility people. But they were only a small part of the empire! Why was the province section removed? The territories that made up the empire are less important than some individuals???
276:
Is not about nobles, but about key people in the military (the commander-in-chief of each international war) and the key politicians (people regarded as the most important politicians in each decade of the Empire).
148:
63:
391:
396:
401:
295:. Still these people are individual, no war can be fought with leaders alone. The actual fighters were the people of Brazil! And they lived in the provinces.
347:
329:? Why can the Portuguese Empire have such a monstruos template, and the Empire of Brazil template can not have one or two lines for the provinces?
381:
386:
406:
113:
326:
355:
100:
58:
33:
246:
207:
177:
351:
39:
242:
203:
173:
363:
334:
300:
266:
112:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
359:
330:
296:
262:
241:
A and how all this lead up to an independent
Brazilian monarchy. Just a thought, thank you,
316:
282:
221:
193:
109:
138:
367:
338:
320:
304:
286:
270:
250:
225:
211:
197:
181:
375:
92:
312:
278:
217:
189:
82:
76:
52:
325:
The articles are more than a line. WRT the template ... have you seen
105:
216:
Don't worry, Cristiano. You were only trying to help. Regards, --
15:
137:
202:
Alright, thank you, sorry for the disruption. Obrigado,
293:
104:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
292:So, you removed it again and destroyed navigation!
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
348:Template:Provinces of the Empire of Brazil
47:
392:Template-Class history of Brazil articles
397:NA-importance history of Brazil articles
49:
346:I removed the section and made use of
402:History of Brazil task force articles
350:, which I had created before, seeing
98:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
7:
327:Template:Portuguese overseas empire
38:It is of interest to the following
122:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Brazil
14:
356:Provinces of the Empire of Brazil
149:the History of Brazil task force
85:
75:
51:
20:
382:Template-Class Brazil articles
146:This template is supported by
1:
387:NA-importance Brazil articles
116:and see a list of open tasks.
368:22:51, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
339:20:35, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
321:20:28, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
305:20:25, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
287:20:22, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
271:20:17, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
407:WikiProject Brazil articles
125:Template:WikiProject Brazil
423:
226:00:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
212:00:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
198:11:36, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
182:00:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
352:Template:Empire of Brazil
145:
70:
46:
251:01:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
142:
141:
354:sitting on the page
143:
101:WikiProject Brazil
34:content assessment
167:Emperor John I/VI
164:
163:
160:
159:
156:
155:
414:
256:Province section
236:Possible section
130:
129:
126:
123:
120:
95:
90:
89:
88:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
422:
421:
417:
416:
415:
413:
412:
411:
372:
371:
258:
243:Cristiano Tomás
238:
204:Cristiano Tomás
174:Cristiano Tomás
169:
128:Brazil articles
127:
124:
121:
118:
117:
91:
86:
84:
61:
12:
11:
5:
420:
418:
410:
409:
404:
399:
394:
389:
384:
374:
373:
344:
343:
342:
341:
290:
289:
257:
254:
237:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
168:
165:
162:
161:
158:
157:
154:
153:
144:
134:
133:
131:
114:the discussion
110:related topics
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
419:
408:
405:
403:
400:
398:
395:
393:
390:
388:
385:
383:
380:
379:
377:
370:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
323:
322:
318:
314:
309:
308:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
288:
284:
280:
275:
274:
273:
272:
268:
264:
255:
253:
252:
248:
244:
235:
227:
223:
219:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
201:
200:
199:
195:
191:
186:
185:
184:
183:
179:
175:
166:
151:
150:
140:
136:
135:
132:
115:
111:
107:
103:
102:
94:
93:Brazil portal
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
360:LatinoLatino
345:
331:LatinoLatino
297:LatinoLatino
291:
263:LatinoLatino
259:
239:
170:
147:
99:
40:WikiProjects
29:
376:Categories
30:template
64:History
119:Brazil
106:Brazil
59:Brazil
36:scale.
313:Lecen
279:Lecen
218:Lecen
190:Lecen
28:This
364:talk
335:talk
317:talk
301:talk
283:talk
267:talk
247:talk
222:talk
208:talk
194:talk
178:talk
108:and
378::
366:)
358:.
337:)
319:)
311:--
303:)
285:)
277:--
269:)
249:)
224:)
210:)
196:)
180:)
62::
362:(
333:(
315:(
299:(
281:(
265:(
245:(
220:(
206:(
192:(
176:(
152:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
