Knowledge (XXG)

Template talk:Ed Miliband

Source 📝

71: 53: 22: 148:
as David Miliband's career develops. Although he's left frontline politics, there is a possibility he could return at a later date, or he may go on to hold another public office, write books, and so on. You're right that Hillary Clinton has a separate template, so if you want to make a separate one for David Miliband then I think that would be all right. What do others think about this?
147:
This is really a template for a party leader so it should focus primarily on Ed Miliband topics. I admit it's an unusual situation because both brothers are involved in politics and have been in the same government, but I don't think making it a conjoined template would work. It could get confusing
188: 193: 87: 78: 58: 70: 52: 132: 33: 83: 162:
One problem with it though is that a David Miliband template would be quite small, but that in itself may not be a problem.
39: 136: 128: 167: 153: 86:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
125:
What about making it a conjoined template for both Miliband brothers. Hilary Clinton has one.
163: 149: 182: 171: 157: 140: 15: 96:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
189:
Template-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
194:
NA-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 99:
Template:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s 8: 79:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom 47: 102:Politics of the United Kingdom articles 49: 76:This template is within the scope of 21: 19: 7: 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 69: 51: 20: 93:Politics of the United Kingdom 84:Politics of the United Kingdom 59:Politics of the United Kingdom 1: 90:and see a list of open tasks. 172:17:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 158:17:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 141:15:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 210: 64: 46: 121:Conjoined template 34:content assessment 131:comment added by 118: 117: 114: 113: 110: 109: 201: 143: 104: 103: 100: 97: 94: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 25: 24: 23: 16: 209: 208: 204: 203: 202: 200: 199: 198: 179: 178: 126: 123: 101: 98: 95: 92: 91: 12: 11: 5: 207: 205: 197: 196: 191: 181: 180: 177: 176: 175: 174: 122: 119: 116: 115: 112: 111: 108: 107: 105: 88:the discussion 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 206: 195: 192: 190: 187: 186: 184: 173: 169: 165: 161: 160: 159: 155: 151: 146: 145: 144: 142: 138: 134: 133:81.144.235.66 130: 120: 106: 89: 85: 81: 80: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 31: 27: 18: 17: 124: 77: 40:WikiProjects 29: 164:TheRetroGuy 150:TheRetroGuy 127:—Preceding 183:Categories 129:unsigned 30:template 36:scale. 28:This 168:talk 154:talk 137:talk 185:: 170:) 156:) 139:) 166:( 152:( 135:( 42::

Index

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Politics of the United Kingdom
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
Politics of the United Kingdom
the discussion
unsigned
81.144.235.66
talk
15:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
TheRetroGuy
talk
17:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
TheRetroGuy
talk
17:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Categories
Template-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
NA-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.