22:
157:
77:
53:
87:
189:
434:
Whether worship should or should not be a "topic within ethics" is frankly irrelevant. What cannot be argued is that worship is a central part of religious ethics, for right or wrong. It is basic
Knowledge (XXG) policy that what placed in this encyclopedia does not have to be the truth but only a
450:
The template is for topics within Ethics. So yes, it is relevant. No one working in the field of ethics in any serious, scholarly or credible way is working on "worship" as subject matter. If you want to place worshhip in an ethics template, then that opens the door to any random ritual by any
264:
The philosopher's index is a citation index for philosophy. it will tell you how many times a work has been cited in the philosophy literature, journals and books. if something is never cited or rarely cited, like say ayn rand novels, then it is not really philosophy, but if it has over 1000
473:
Those studying religious ethics work on worship as a subject matter, whether they should be or not. But you avoid the point and I repeat myself. Do you know if it is possible to get outside opinions to settle this, and then I'll stop.
615:
It is an interesting phenomenon. Everyone thinks they are an expert in philosophy, even if they have absolutely no formal education or experience in the subject matter. The fact is that if you are doing religion, you aren't doing
245:
it does. i learned it in ethical theory and have taught it. it's as good as virtue theory in its modern construction. if you want standards.... just use citation count on philosopher's index perhaps over 1000.
384:
I included
Socrates but it was removed saying "Socrates not recognized in contemporary literature as a pre-eminient ethical theorist." But It is always recognized as a moral philosopher (even cited on top of
235:
deserves similar standing to the three dominant normative ethical theories for example, or which philosophers belong in the list of ethicists by reading the individual articles alone. Any proposals?
204:
265:
citation, then it is. if you want to know if something is important or central to the field, or subfield in philosophy, you look at how many times it is cited and who cites it. --
520:, a frequent philosophy editor and looks genuine about editing Knowledge (XXG). I still think you are not addressing the point but if s/he agrees with you, I'll drop this issue.
108:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
356:
was intended. Since this template is on many pages is there a simple way to update all the pages with this template or does it have to be done on an individual basis?
642:
within the
Concepts section of the Ethics template and remove any topics within the Concepts section to avoid duplication? This would be a template within a template.
566:
is still very easy to find on wikipedia. IP, just to make sure you don't think worship is being ignored completely, I made an edit to the "see also" list over at
665:
670:
164:
63:
286:
I don`t have a citation counter here but am quite sure
Gilligan cannot possibly be a key thinker on a par with Aristotle or Kant, or even Macintyre --
321:, while going to a page that describes it ethically ("the opposite of right"), still has little substance. Can someone please improve this wrong.—
110:
675:
680:
685:
643:
228:
224:
555:
On the other hand, those thinkers also have a lot to say about caring for your children, gathering for mass, and many more activities.
100:
58:
598:
521:
475:
436:
424:
33:
547:
Here's why I don't think "Worship" needs to be here. We should ask ourselves: Can worship be an important part of life?
195:
370:
I am surprised that responsibility (in particular: "Moral responsibility") isn't listed as a core issue of ethics. -
411:
is a disambiguation page. What type of responsibility is intended here? (There is already a separate link to
544:
Sorry to see an edit war. Happy to see a discussion. IP wants my opinion so, sure, I'll offer some thoughts.
39:
647:
353:
639:
602:
525:
479:
440:
597:
Hmm, I thought I had one straightforward case. Oh well then. Thank you
Tesseract2 for taking the time.
394:
451:
religion. There is nothing inherently moral or immoral about worship any more than any other rituals.
588:
412:
390:
621:
571:
567:
507:
493:
464:
557:
The question is whether worship is directly related to the "study" of what is "right and wrong"
420:
92:
581:
517:
357:
331:
408:
256:
255:
It was rhetorical. What do you mean by "citation count on philosopher's index" exactly?
236:
232:
488:
Take this to one of the religion templates. It's not philosophy. Do not replace this.
352:
Currently this links to a disambiguation page. For this
Template perhaps the article
156:
659:
617:
503:
489:
460:
416:
287:
266:
247:
389:) and still very influential to some that don't accept any kind of contingency.--
371:
339:
322:
105:
82:
317:, as in a right to due process, with no reference to the opposite to wrong.
651:
625:
606:
591:
529:
511:
497:
483:
468:
444:
398:
374:
360:
342:
325:
290:
269:
259:
250:
239:
563:
104:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
188:
386:
335:
76:
52:
318:
308:
634:
Including the Good and Evil template within the
Concepts section
307:
The links for these two ethical concepts are woefully lacking.
551:
Do religious ethical thinkers have a lot to say about worship?
338:, as the page to describe the ethical meanings of these words.—
183:
15:
155:
223:
Can we establish an objective criteria for inclusion?
435:
reporting of the (right or wrong) opinion of others.
562:
So no, I don't think we should change the template.
138:
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
231:entries? It's difficult to ascertain whether
8:
114:about philosophy content on Knowledge (XXG).
135:
47:
49:
120:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Philosophy
98:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
7:
229:Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
225:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
38:It is of interest to the following
666:Template-Class Philosophy articles
199:
194:This template was considered for
14:
671:NA-importance Philosophy articles
187:
85:
75:
51:
20:
638:Would it make sense to include
559:. Worship is not direct study.
334:, which currently redirects to
123:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
676:Template-Class ethics articles
375:23:47, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
681:NA-importance ethics articles
516:I have asked the opinion of
652:16:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
702:
686:Ethics task force articles
626:18:19, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
607:17:32, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
592:08:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
530:17:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
512:21:52, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
498:21:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
484:20:00, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
469:18:01, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
459:to you, anonymous person.
445:17:32, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
311:currently refers to legal
570:. (Worship is now listed
425:13:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
291:09:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
163:
134:
70:
46:
399:00:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
361:03:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
343:15:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
326:15:51, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
502:I agree with Gregbard.
354:Trust (social sciences)
270:09:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
260:00:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
251:00:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
240:18:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
139:Associated task forces:
640:Template:Good and evil
160:
101:WikiProject Philosophy
159:
577:Good luck everyone.
413:Moral responsibility
202:. The result of the
126:Philosophy articles
568:Ethics in religion
161:
111:general discussion
34:content assessment
216:
215:
182:
181:
178:
177:
174:
173:
170:
169:
93:Philosophy portal
693:
585:
404:"Responsibility"
380:Why not Socrates
330:I suggest using
201:
191:
184:
146:
136:
128:
127:
124:
121:
118:
95:
90:
89:
88:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
701:
700:
696:
695:
694:
692:
691:
690:
656:
655:
636:
583:
553:Absolutely yes!
518:User:Tesseract2
432:
406:
382:
368:
350:
332:Right and wrong
305:
303:Right and wrong
221:
144:
125:
122:
119:
116:
115:
91:
86:
84:
61:
12:
11:
5:
699:
697:
689:
688:
683:
678:
673:
668:
658:
657:
635:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
610:
609:
543:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
431:
428:
409:Responsibility
405:
402:
381:
378:
367:
364:
349:
346:
304:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
233:ethics of care
220:
217:
214:
213:
192:
180:
179:
176:
175:
172:
171:
168:
167:
162:
152:
151:
149:
147:
141:
140:
132:
131:
129:
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
698:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
663:
661:
654:
653:
649:
645:
644:66.180.23.144
641:
633:
627:
623:
619:
614:
613:
612:
611:
608:
604:
600:
596:
595:
594:
593:
590:
587:
586:
578:
575:
573:
569:
565:
560:
558:
554:
550:
545:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:
513:
509:
505:
501:
500:
499:
495:
491:
487:
486:
485:
481:
477:
472:
471:
470:
466:
462:
458:
457:Hare Chrishna
454:
453:Hare Chrishna
449:
448:
447:
446:
442:
438:
429:
427:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
403:
401:
400:
396:
392:
388:
379:
377:
376:
373:
365:
363:
362:
359:
355:
347:
345:
344:
341:
337:
333:
328:
327:
324:
320:
316:
315:
310:
302:
292:
289:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
271:
268:
263:
262:
261:
258:
254:
253:
252:
249:
244:
243:
242:
241:
238:
234:
230:
226:
218:
211:
207:
206:
200:2020 March 31
197:
193:
190:
186:
185:
166:
158:
154:
153:
150:
148:
143:
142:
137:
133:
130:
113:
112:
107:
103:
102:
94:
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
637:
582:
579:
576:
561:
556:
552:
548:
546:
542:
456:
452:
433:
407:
383:
369:
351:
329:
313:
312:
306:
222:
210:no consensus
209:
203:
109:
99:
40:WikiProjects
29:
616:philosophy.
599:192.12.13.7
522:192.12.13.7
476:192.12.13.1
437:192.12.13.7
366:Core Issues
660:Categories
358:Lmielke359
205:discussion
117:Philosophy
106:philosophy
59:Philosophy
618:Greg Bard
584:Tesseract
490:Greg Bard
461:Greg Bard
340:Red Baron
323:Red Baron
257:Skomorokh
237:Skomorokh
504:Frietjes
219:Criteria
196:deletion
30:template
564:Worship
430:Worship
421:call me
391:Pediboi
348:"Trust"
288:Isolani
267:Buridan
248:Buridan
589:(talk)
423:Russ)
387:Ethics
372:Atfyfe
336:Ethics
314:rights
165:Ethics
64:Ethics
36:scale.
417:R'n'B
415:.) --
319:Wrong
309:Right
208:was "
28:This
648:talk
622:talk
603:talk
572:here
549:Yes.
526:talk
508:talk
494:talk
480:talk
465:talk
441:talk
395:talk
574:.)
227:or
198:on
662::
650:)
624:)
605:)
528:)
510:)
496:)
482:)
467:)
455:.
443:)
397:)
246:--
212:".
145:/
62::
646:(
620:(
601:(
580:-
524:(
506:(
492:(
478:(
463:(
439:(
419:(
393:(
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
