544:
bundling directly instead of splashing a tag in the text. When encountering a refbomb, I usually try to trim the citations myself, but it's often better to leave this to editors who are already knowledgeable with the subject matter and its RS coverage, so they can select the best sources to keep among all those cited. Therefore I reckon it's better to inform the "local experts" with this tag, and guide them to the most appropriate advice. —
196:– One is an inline template; the other is a standard maintenance tag. Both have the similar purpose: inform readers that a page or statement may have too many citations or references. However, the current names are very confusing. Also, the inline template is transcluded in 100+, while the other is transcluded in seven pages. If the suggested titles are not suitable names, I welcome alternatives.
441:
493:
476:). I have added the current template data from to the documentation page, where it can be filled in by non-template-editors (currently it included a blank array of parameters). I would have filled it in myself, but I'm not familiar with template data enough. The change would also remove a few unneeded blank lines. Thanks, --
576:
Yeah, essays are not dispositive of whether a problem is a real problem and should be fixed, since anyone can write a counter-essay at any time to contradict it (while an essay contradicting a guideline or policy, in other than a "consider this what-if for a moment" manner, will generally get MfDed).
543:
S of 8 citations or more, all telling the same thing, so that the appropriate advice is to keep just the top two or three. There are indeed a few cases when all citations are useful and should be bundled for concision, but in that case the person noticing the issue would likely proceed with the
562:, but it sounds like it's the same general idea that I had - a guideline is a better link target than an essay. I will agree, however, that removing excessive citations is probably better than bundling them. Maybe modifying the guideline to include that as an option?
538:
I believe that, for an inline tag, the most appropriate link target is indeed OVERCITE, which describes the problem and various remedies. In contrast, the current link only suggests to group citations in a bundle, which is in most cases not what is needed. I've seen
40:, a collaborative effort to improve and manage Knowledge (XXG)'s inline footnote, cleanup and dispute templates. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
44:
625:
36:
21:
100:
It was fine as it was; "excessive citation" was using "citation" in a verbal sense, not as a singular noun. It works okay in plural form, though.
145:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
181:
588:
383:
112:
469:
577:
There probably is enough agreement about the issue covered at OVERCITE that something about it could be added the guideline.
511:
355:
235:
190:
412:
136:
365:
255:
186:
447:
422:
146:
559:
90:
585:
380:
109:
599:
528:
540:
606:
593:
571:
548:
516:
485:
481:
392:
346:
322:
298:
284:
270:
220:
205:
201:
167:
121:
94:
567:
338:
318:
290:
276:
227:
212:
163:
331:
307:
245:
177:
84:
580:
555:
505:
374:
342:
294:
280:
266:
216:
103:
211:
I really don't see how "Excessive
Citations" is less confusing than "ExcessiveCitations".
598:
I would strongly support updating the guideline along the lines of the very-well-crafted
477:
197:
619:
563:
532:
314:
159:
500:
262:
421:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
275:
Well yes, but couldn't you just change or get rid of the redirect instead?
603:
545:
303:
And I undid that change. There are still uses that should point to
435:
536:
473:
411:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
289:
Someone actually just changed it a little while ago.
149:. No further edits should be made to this section.
83:, as over use always involve several citations. --
43:Some discussion of this template may take place at
425:. No further edits should be made to this section.
432:Template-protected edit request on 24 April 2019
327:And the guy redid it and changed them all to
8:
54:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Inline Templates
527:I changed the link target to its original
135:The following is a closed discussion of a
15:
17:
57:Template:WikiProject Inline Templates
34:This template is within the scope of
7:
337:. Does that sound good to everyone?
154:The result of the move request was:
602:essay. Start on talk page there? —
182:Template:Excessive citations inline
626:WikiProject Inline Templates pages
14:
491:
439:
1:
578:
372:
101:
523:Most appropriate link target
191:Template:Excessive citations
122:00:30, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
79:Added plural use of citation
37:WikiProject Inline Templates
462:to reactivate your request.
450:has been answered. Set the
371:going to different places.
313:that were breaking things.
261:, which is very confusing.
187:Template:ExcessiveCitations
642:
517:03:53, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
486:00:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
128:Requested move 9 May 2017
95:20:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
60:Inline Templates articles
27:
472:version of the sandbox (
468:Please replace with the
418:Please do not modify it.
393:18:16, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
351:Yes. We should not have
347:10:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
323:01:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
299:22:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
285:21:28, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
271:18:44, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
221:11:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
168:18:23, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
142:Please do not modify it.
607:23:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
594:22:48, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
572:19:03, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
549:00:34, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
206:06:55, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
45:the project's talk page
531:, but was reverted by
356:Excessive citations
236:Excessive citations
47:, rather than here.
554:I didn't see that
366:ExcessiveCitations
256:ExcessiveCitations
558:changed the link
515:
466:
465:
178:Template:Overcite
72:
71:
68:
67:
633:
592:
503:
495:
494:
457:
453:
443:
442:
436:
420:
391:
370:
364:
360:
354:
336:
330:
312:
306:
260:
254:
250:
244:
240:
234:
231:
144:
120:
62:
61:
58:
55:
52:
51:Inline Templates
29:
28:
22:Inline Templates
16:
641:
640:
636:
635:
634:
632:
631:
630:
616:
615:
525:
492:
455:
451:
440:
434:
429:
416:
389:
368:
362:
358:
352:
334:
328:
310:
304:
258:
252:
248:
242:
238:
232:
225:
140:
130:
118:
77:
59:
56:
53:
50:
49:
12:
11:
5:
639:
637:
629:
628:
618:
617:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
524:
521:
520:
519:
464:
463:
444:
433:
430:
428:
427:
413:requested move
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
387:
287:
194:
193:
184:
173:
171:
152:
151:
137:requested move
131:
129:
126:
125:
124:
116:
76:
73:
70:
69:
66:
65:
63:
41:
32:
25:
24:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
638:
627:
624:
623:
621:
608:
605:
601:
597:
596:
595:
590:
587:
584:
583:
575:
574:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
552:
551:
550:
547:
542:
537:
534:
530:
522:
518:
513:
510:
507:
502:
498:
490:
489:
488:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
461:
458:parameter to
449:
445:
438:
437:
431:
426:
424:
419:
414:
409:
408:
394:
385:
382:
379:
377:
367:
357:
350:
349:
348:
344:
340:
333:
326:
325:
324:
320:
316:
309:
302:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:
272:
268:
264:
257:
247:
241:redirects to
237:
229:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
192:
188:
185:
183:
179:
176:
175:
174:
170:
169:
165:
161:
158:as proposed.
157:
150:
148:
143:
138:
133:
132:
127:
123:
114:
111:
108:
106:
99:
98:
97:
96:
92:
88:
87:
82:
74:
64:
48:
46:
39:
38:
33:
31:
30:
26:
23:
20:
18:
581:
560:back in 2017
526:
508:
496:
467:
459:
448:edit request
417:
410:
375:
195:
172:
155:
153:
141:
134:
104:
86:Gwillhickers
85:
80:
78:
42:
35:
600:WP:OVERCITE
582:SMcCandlish
556:SMcCandlish
529:WP:OVERCITE
423:move review
376:SMcCandlish
251:instead of
147:move review
105:SMcCandlish
541:WP:REFBOMB
452:|answered=
478:DannyS712
198:George Ho
620:Category
564:Primefac
533:Primefac
332:Overcite
315:Primefac
308:overcite
246:Overcite
160:Primefac
470:current
501:JJMC89
339:Esszet
291:Esszet
277:Esszet
263:Jarble
228:Esszet
213:Esszet
75:Plural
456:|ans=
446:This
156:moved
568:talk
497:Done
482:talk
474:diff
361:and
343:talk
319:talk
295:talk
281:talk
267:talk
217:talk
202:talk
164:talk
91:talk
604:JFG
591:😼
546:JFG
454:or
415:.
390:ⱷ≼
386:≽ⱷ҅
119:ⱷ≼
115:≽ⱷ҅
622::
579:—
570:)
499:—
484:)
460:no
373:—
369:}}
363:{{
359:}}
353:{{
345:)
335:}}
329:{{
321:)
311:}}
305:{{
297:)
283:)
269:)
259:}}
253:{{
249:}}
243:{{
239:}}
233:{{
219:)
204:)
189:→
180:→
166:)
139:.
102:—
93:)
589:¢
586:☏
566:(
535:.
514:)
512:C
509:·
506:T
504:(
480:(
388:ᴥ
384:¢
381:☏
378:☺
341:(
317:(
293:(
279:(
265:(
230::
226:@
215:(
200:(
162:(
117:ᴥ
113:¢
110:☏
107:☺
89:(
81:s
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.