273:. But I (and apparently the creator; not sure about M3taphysical) don't know the technicalities of doing that. As the bar was originally created (and changed by M3taphysical) it is so wide it botches the format of articles and is very distracting. So I think if we are going to have the template, it needs to be done by someone who knows how to properly format. It's not good to leave it oversized simply because the creator(s) don't know how to format it properly. Let's suppose hypothetically that an item is added to the bar that is much longer than the longest item currently there (right now it's "Post-hypnotic suggestion"); suppose someone adds an item with about a dozen more letters; do we just let the bar get wider and wider until it takes up most of the right side of the page? I don't think so. If it is impossible to make it into a properly sized sidebar, my opinion is to change it into a template that goes at the bottom of the page, such as
22:
71:
53:
81:
312:
wide. Are you implying that these sidebars are also disruptive to all the articles they are displayed on? In any case, whether the sidebar width really constitutes a problem or not, I believe that we should not display a text bellow 80% of its normal size (the current text is 60% of its normal size).
362:
Even with my inadequate wiki skills, I created the template below in about 15 minutes. Someone may be able to improve it, but it already works far better than the current template. It is easily readable, it contains all the same information, it can be expanded without additional formatting problems,
194:
I would like to request that the creator(s) of this bar narrow its width. It is so wide that it creates very poor formatting in articles that contain it, especially if it is placed near the top of the page. Such bars are supposed to assist the reader, not disrupt the formatting of the article. As an
650:
I designed this bar, based on the NLP one already in use. It's not a big deal if people want to resize it but my honest opinion is that it is perfectly fine as it stands. I can read the text perfectly well, and the size doesn't seem to disrupt the format of the articles in my view. I appreciate
299:
As far as I know of, there is no general policy on sidebar width limitations. I understand that sidebars are not meant to disrupt an article's content – however I cannot clearly see how this sidebar can really be disruptive. Do you have any visual examples of articles where the layout is actually
673:
I'm not sure about the inclusion of
Ainslie Meares here. My impression is that he's not, e.g., in the top 20 most important figures in the history of the field. The new Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis, a major reference book on the subject published last year, lists roughly 1300 people in its Name
264:
the purpose of the sidebar. Someone with some expertise in such formatting needs to fix this bar. Apparently it was created by someone who did not completely understand this process. I believe it is possible to enlarge the text a bit (perhaps by wrapping long entries so they take up two lines)
610:
I apologize for reverting edits so quickly. I still do not see how a template that is merely 150 pixels wide can cause such harmful disruption – especially if we consider that many commonly-used sidebar templates are much wider than that. In any case, my point was that the template should be
674:
Index but Meares isn't one of them. I don't remember ever having seen him referenced in any other textbook either. I'm going to remove him for the time being, until we can establish he's one of the top 20 or so figures in the history of the subject.
629:
No apology needed. Thanks for your comments. I'll wait a bit to see whether others comment. In the mean time, feel free to expand the text on the current bar until something is decided about which template to use.
226:
constitutes the smallest visible text size (80%). In my opinion, we shouldn't opt for any text size that goes bellow this, as it gets harder to read. Remember that this template will be shown on
450:
615:. Whether it is a sidebar or a bottom template, anything is fine as long as the text can be read with ease. Thus I believe we can temporarily settle on the bottom template you made. --
363:
and it lets the article flow without a distracting interruption. I think we need to choose between the two templates unless someone can come up with a better idea.
723:
728:
340:
Please don't revert without consensus. My opinion at this point is that this should be converted to a template that goes at the bottom of the page, like
733:
103:
700:
300:
harmed by the template width? Perhaps a simple rearrangement would suffice. When compared to other sidebar templates, such as those for
94:
58:
398:
214:
I understand your concern, but why does the text size have to be so small? The very purpose of this template is to serve as a
33:
546:
480:
266:
219:
196:
160:
598:
651:
others might disagree, that's just my view on things. It looks pretty similar to the other sidebars I've seen.
592:
321:
as being necessary – then I believe this will have to be done some other way than just reducing the text size. --
474:
679:
656:
580:
704:
39:
305:
568:
696:
148:
620:
326:
247:
675:
652:
172:
102:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
156:
230:
page on which there is a {{hypnosis}} tag. It seems a bit far-fetched to request wikipedians to use a
693:
Dave Elmans book on hypnosis is considered the bible by many (mostly outside of acedemic circles..)
277:. That basically accomplishes the same purpose but without disrupting the formatting of the article.
492:
468:
341:
274:
152:
635:
534:
528:
486:
368:
353:
301:
282:
204:
180:
616:
540:
384:
322:
243:
86:
222:
sidebar (which, mind you, is larger than the text size you've actually set on this template)
231:
218:
bar. Right now, most users won't even be able to read the links in it. The text size of the
510:
345:
552:
462:
428:
260:
We also shouldn't opt for a sidebar that is disruptive of an article, because that is
717:
631:
522:
516:
504:
456:
434:
364:
349:
278:
200:
176:
498:
422:
70:
52:
574:
99:
76:
586:
708:
683:
660:
639:
624:
372:
357:
330:
286:
251:
242:
really that wide. Perhaps it simply ought to be placed in a better spot? --
208:
184:
164:
407:
142:
317:
need to reduce the template width – something I currently do not
141:
You absolutely must include
Vladimir Bekhterev in this section.
380:
15:
376:
344:. If we can't come to an agreement, there needs to be an
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
560:
442:
414:
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
392:
8:
195:example of a more restrained template, see
399:
385:
377:
238:article's layout. After all, the template
143:http://en.wikipedia.org/Vladimir_Bekhterev
47:
49:
308:, it can't really be considered to be
112:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology
92:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
7:
234:simply because you want to preserve
38:It is of interest to the following
724:Template-Class psychology articles
14:
729:NA-importance psychology articles
79:
69:
51:
20:
734:WikiProject Psychology articles
115:Template:WikiProject Psychology
267:Template: Psychology (sidebar)
197:Template: Psychology (sidebar)
185:06:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
1:
269:has larger text, but the bar
106:and see a list of open tasks.
661:22:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
640:19:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
625:19:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
373:17:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
358:16:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
331:07:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
287:01:57, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
252:01:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
165:14:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
684:10:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
209:02:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
750:
265:without widening the bar.
709:02:11, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
64:
46:
581:Post-hypnotic suggestion
569:Hypnotic susceptibility
95:WikiProject Psychology
689:Why not Dave Elman?
575:Hypnotic suggestion
547:André Weitzenhoffer
493:Jean-Martin Charcot
475:Étienne Eugène Azam
469:Jean-Martin Charcot
451:Marquis de Puységur
342:Template:Psychology
275:Template:Psychology
118:psychology articles
535:Milton H. Erickson
529:Theodore R. Sarbin
487:Hippolyte Bernheim
34:content assessment
699:comment added by
606:
605:
541:Ernest R. Hilgard
168:
151:comment added by
134:
133:
130:
129:
126:
125:
87:Psychology portal
741:
711:
601:
555:
437:
401:
394:
387:
378:
232:magnifying glass
167:
145:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
749:
748:
744:
743:
742:
740:
739:
738:
714:
713:
694:
691:
671:
607:
602:
567:
556:
553:Nicholas Spanos
449:
438:
421:
410:
405:
192:
146:
139:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
85:
80:
78:
12:
11:
5:
747:
745:
737:
736:
731:
726:
716:
715:
701:68.192.113.125
690:
687:
676:HypnoSynthesis
670:
669:Ainslie Meares
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
653:HypnoSynthesis
645:
644:
643:
642:
604:
603:
566:
564:
562:RELATED TOPICS
558:
557:
463:John Elliotson
448:
446:
440:
439:
429:Stage hypnosis
420:
418:
412:
411:
406:
404:
403:
396:
389:
381:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
306:Marxist theory
292:
291:
290:
289:
271:is not as wide
255:
254:
191:
188:
138:
135:
132:
131:
128:
127:
124:
123:
121:
104:the discussion
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
746:
735:
732:
730:
727:
725:
722:
721:
719:
712:
710:
706:
702:
698:
688:
686:
685:
681:
677:
668:
662:
658:
654:
649:
648:
647:
646:
641:
637:
633:
628:
627:
626:
622:
618:
614:
609:
608:
600:
597:
594:
591:
588:
585:
582:
579:
576:
573:
570:
565:
563:
559:
554:
551:
548:
545:
542:
539:
536:
533:
530:
527:
524:
523:Clark L. Hull
521:
518:
517:Morton Prince
515:
512:
509:
506:
505:Sigmund Freud
503:
500:
497:
494:
491:
488:
485:
482:
479:
476:
473:
470:
467:
464:
461:
458:
457:James Esdaile
455:
452:
447:
445:
441:
436:
435:Self-hypnosis
433:
430:
427:
424:
419:
417:
413:
409:
402:
397:
395:
390:
388:
383:
382:
379:
375:
374:
370:
366:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
311:
307:
303:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
263:
259:
258:
257:
256:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
199:. Thank you.
198:
189:
187:
186:
182:
178:
174:
169:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
144:
136:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
692:
672:
617:m3taphysical
612:
595:
589:
583:
577:
571:
561:
549:
543:
537:
531:
525:
519:
513:
507:
501:
499:Pierre Janet
495:
489:
483:
481:A. Liébeault
477:
471:
465:
459:
453:
443:
431:
425:
423:Hypnotherapy
416:APPLICATIONS
415:
391:
361:
339:
323:m3taphysical
318:
314:
309:
270:
261:
244:m3taphysical
239:
235:
227:
223:
215:
193:
170:
147:— Preceding
140:
93:
40:WikiProjects
29:
695:—Preceding
310:excessively
224:practically
190:Size of bar
173:James Braid
718:Categories
593:Regression
511:Émile Coué
315:absolutely
220:psychology
216:navigation
109:Psychology
100:Psychology
59:Psychology
587:Mesmerism
302:sociology
697:unsigned
632:Ward3001
613:readable
408:Hypnosis
365:Ward3001
350:Ward3001
279:Ward3001
201:Ward3001
177:Stefsera
161:contribs
149:unsigned
137:Untitled
30:template
444:ORIGINS
153:AmedeoB
313:If we
36:scale.
240:isn't
228:every
175:too.
28:This
705:talk
680:talk
657:talk
636:talk
621:talk
369:talk
354:talk
327:talk
304:and
283:talk
248:talk
205:talk
181:talk
171:And
157:talk
599:NLP
346:RfC
319:see
262:not
236:one
720::
707:)
682:)
659:)
638:)
623:)
371:)
356:)
348:.
329:)
285:)
250:)
207:)
183:)
163:)
159:•
703:(
678:(
655:(
634:(
619:(
596:·
590:·
584:·
578:·
572:·
550:·
544:·
538:·
532:·
526:·
520:·
514:·
508:·
502:·
496:·
490:·
484:·
478:·
472:·
466:·
460:·
454:·
432:·
426:·
400:e
393:t
386:v
367:(
352:(
325:(
281:(
246:(
203:(
179:(
155:(
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
