Knowledge

Template talk:Infobox U.S. federal court/Archive 1

Source 📝

31: 170: 328: 118:. The links are quite "extricable" -- they are well-defined and breakable. I agree that some pages list the US Attorney. But that doesn't mean the US Attorney is an attribute of the Court, which is what placement in the Infobox implies. So, I guess...I am not convinced. But we should probably seek another opinion? I suppose perhaps on 110:
citizen in a particular district will be prosecuted by that district's U.S. Attorney. While you are correct they are not the same office, they are inextricably linked. Many if not most of the pages for the Courts already list the U.S. Attorney. I just thought it would be better if they were included in the infobox.
109:
My thought was that District Courts and U.S. Attorneys are assigned to exactly the same districts; they are coterminous. Any suit filed against the federal government in any district court will be defended by that district's U.S. Attorney or his/her office. Any suit filed by the government against a
199:
parameter be changed to allow a list of locations instead of just one? Almost none of the official websites of the district courts that meet in multiple locations list any one courthouse as being the "main" one. (I'd make this change myself but I'm unsure of what the best way to do it is, as I have
74:
Here's a discussion from Nevermore27's talk page I'm moving here. It's my intent to revert the recent addition of US Attorney to this infobox, because a US Attorney is not part of, nor an attribute of, a federal district court. But I wanted to give people the opportunity to disagree and discuss.
113:
They are indeed coterminous. I'm not sure it's true that any suit against the government will be defended by that district's US Attorney; while an AUSA almost always enters an appearance, it's fairly common for lead counsel to be from other parts of the DOJ. In any event, they are linked, but
93:
Hi, Nevermore27! I see you recently editing a whole slew of district court articles with "(added U.S. Attorney to infobox)." Can you justify this? The United States Attorney for a district is not part of its Court. (It's often true that they have an office in the same building as the Court or
145:
Well, you may be more optimistic than I. It could well be that no one else is interested, in which case it would be decided by you and I. In the absence of better venue suggestions I suppose I'll write something up tomorrow (US/Eastern). Incidently,
150:(3:06-cv-00545 in cand) appears to be an example of a suit against the federal government with no appearance by the local USA (though they were summonsed), but only by some DOJ folks from DC. Not that it really matters. 94:
Courthouse, but that is not the same thing.) My inclination is that these edits are incorrect and should be reverted, but I wanted to discuss it with you first. Thanks! (Or maybe we should talk about it somewhere else?)
241: 240:
Never mind. It appears that someone else has already found and implemented (on every district court page I've checked, at least) a much more elegant solution than any I had in mind. (See, for example,
308:
parameter that would allow an editor to enter any text where the court name goes. The proposal also involves removing the parentheses that enclose the abbreviation unless the
47: 17: 300:). This infobox should be able to accommodate for them, since they are not territorial courts. Therefore, I have put the following proposal in 126:? Do you have other suggestions on how to resolve this, or a more convincing argument, or a better choice of venue for the discussion? Thanks. 267: 147: 296:
There are some historical U.S. district courts whose name is not in the format of "United States District Court for the..." (like the
301: 140:
I can't come up with a different argument that could convince you, but I agree it's not going to be decided by you and I alone.
119: 123: 297: 38: 341: 320: 281: 251: 228: 207: 185: 159: 135: 103: 84: 248: 204: 181: 155: 131: 99: 80: 312:
parameter is used. This is because some courts, e.g. Court for China, do not have abbreviations.
258: 245: 215: 201: 177: 151: 127: 95: 76: 334: 313: 274: 235: 221: 169: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
263:
Yep, that was me. This template is now defunct and has been replaced by
242:
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
220:
Reviving this discussion. How do you propose this would look?
25: 8: 200:very little experience editing templates.) 120:Template talk:Infobox U.S. district court 18:Template talk:Infobox U.S. federal court 148:Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland et al 88: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 70:Concern about presence of US Attorney 7: 24: 326: 168: 29: 124:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Law 1: 298:United States Court for China 208:16:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC) 186:18:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 160:07:37, 12 August 2014 (UTC) 136:07:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC) 104:22:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 85:19:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC) 358: 268:Infobox U.S. federal court 342:14:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC) 321:02:44, 17 June 2018 (UTC) 229:02:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC) 282:16:45, 9 July 2018 (UTC) 252:15:36, 9 July 2018 (UTC) 292:Allow for custom name 122:with a referral from 42:of past discussions. 191:Multiple locations 249:(/ˌskiːəˈsɔːrəs/) 205:(/ˌskiːəˈsɔːrəs/) 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 349: 338: 330: 329: 317: 311: 307: 278: 272: 266: 262: 239: 225: 219: 198: 172: 116:not inextricably 90:prior discussion 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 357: 356: 352: 351: 350: 348: 347: 346: 336: 327: 315: 309: 305: 294: 276: 270: 264: 256: 233: 223: 213: 196: 193: 166: 91: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 355: 353: 345: 344: 293: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 192: 189: 165: 164: 163: 162: 143: 142: 141: 89: 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 354: 343: 340: 339: 333: 325: 324: 323: 322: 319: 318: 303: 299: 291: 283: 280: 279: 269: 260: 255: 254: 253: 250: 247: 243: 237: 232: 231: 230: 227: 226: 217: 212: 211: 210: 209: 206: 203: 190: 188: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 161: 157: 153: 149: 144: 139: 138: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 112: 111: 108: 107: 106: 105: 101: 97: 87: 86: 82: 78: 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 335: 331: 314: 310:abbreviation 295: 275: 222: 194: 173: 167: 115: 92: 73: 60: 43: 37: 306:custom name 304:: create a 302:the sandbox 36:This is an 259:Skiasaurus 246:Skiasaurus 216:Skiasaurus 202:Skiasaurus 178:jhawkinson 152:jhawkinson 128:jhawkinson 96:jhawkinson 77:jhawkinson 61:Archive 1 337:Ergo Sum 316:Ergo Sum 277:Ergo Sum 236:Ergo Sum 224:Ergo Sum 197:location 195:Can the 174:Reverted 39:archive 16:< 332:Done 182:talk 156:talk 132:talk 100:talk 81:talk 244:). 273:. 271:}} 265:{{ 184:) 176:. 158:) 134:) 102:) 83:) 261:: 257:@ 238:: 234:@ 218:: 214:@ 180:( 154:( 130:( 98:( 79:( 50:.

Index

Template talk:Infobox U.S. federal court
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
jhawkinson
talk
19:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
jhawkinson
talk
22:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Template talk:Infobox U.S. district court
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Law
jhawkinson
talk
07:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland et al
jhawkinson
talk
07:37, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
arrow
jhawkinson
talk
18:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Skiasaurus
(/ˌskiːəˈsɔːrəs/)
16:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Skiasaurus
Ergo Sum
02:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Ergo Sum

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.